@vfarcic/dot-ai 0.31.0 → 0.32.0

This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
package/package.json CHANGED
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
1
1
  {
2
2
  "name": "@vfarcic/dot-ai",
3
- "version": "0.31.0",
3
+ "version": "0.32.0",
4
4
  "description": "Universal Kubernetes application deployment agent with CLI and MCP interfaces",
5
5
  "main": "dist/index.js",
6
6
  "types": "dist/index.d.ts",
@@ -27,13 +27,23 @@ Analyze the user's intent and determine the best solution(s). **Provide multiple
27
27
 
28
28
  ## Scoring Guidelines
29
29
 
30
- Score solutions based on completeness and schema validation:
30
+ **CRITICAL**: Identify whether each solution uses CRDs or standard Kubernetes resources, then apply the appropriate scoring range:
31
31
 
32
- - **90-100**: Complete solution, schema fields directly support ALL requirements
33
- - **70-89**: Good solution, schema fields support most requirements with minor gaps
34
- - **50-69**: Partial solution, schema fields support some requirements but missing others
35
- - **30-49**: Incomplete solution, schema fields only partially support requirements
36
- - **0-29**: Poor fit, schema fields don't meaningfully support the requirements
32
+ ### For CRD/Custom Resource Solutions:
33
+ - **90-100**: CRD that clearly addresses user intent - operators provide higher-level abstractions and automatic resource management
34
+ - **70-89**: CRD with partial relevance to user intent - may work but not ideal fit
35
+ - **30-69**: CRD with limited relevance - significant gaps for this use case
36
+ - **0-29**: CRD completely irrelevant to user intent
37
+
38
+ ### For Standard Kubernetes Resource Solutions:
39
+ - **80-89**: Standard resource combination that fully addresses user intent
40
+ - **60-79**: Standard resources with minor gaps or additional complexity
41
+ - **30-59**: Standard resources with significant limitations - major gaps in functionality
42
+ - **0-29**: Standard resources poorly suited for this intent
43
+
44
+ **Rationale**: CRDs get preference when relevant because operators provide domain expertise and simplified management. Standard resources remain reliable when no suitable CRDs exist.
45
+
46
+ **IMPORTANT**: Never score a CRD in the 80-89 range (reserved for standard resources) or standard resources in the 90-100 range (reserved for CRDs).
37
47
 
38
48
  ## Response Format
39
49