@vfarcic/dot-ai 0.30.0 → 0.32.0

package/package.json

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 {
   "name": "@vfarcic/dot-ai",
-  "version": "0.30.0",
+  "version": "0.32.0",
   "description": "Universal Kubernetes application deployment agent with CLI and MCP interfaces",
   "main": "dist/index.js",
   "types": "dist/index.d.ts",

package/prompts/resource-solution-ranking.md

@@ -10,10 +10,12 @@ You are a Kubernetes expert helping to determine which resource(s) best meet a u
 
 ## Instructions
 
-Analyze the user's intent and determine the best solution(s). This could be:
+Analyze the user's intent and determine the best solution(s). **Provide multiple alternative approaches** ranked by effectiveness, such as:
 - A single resource that fully addresses the need
 - A combination of resources that can actually integrate and work together to create a complete solution
-- Multiple alternative approaches ranked by effectiveness
+- Different approaches with varying complexity and capabilities
+
+**IMPORTANT**: Always provide at least 2-3 different solution alternatives when possible, even if some score lower than others. Users benefit from seeing multiple options to choose from.
 
 ## Validation Requirements
 
@@ -25,13 +27,23 @@ Analyze the user's intent and determine the best solution(s). This could be:
 
 ## Scoring Guidelines
 
-Score solutions based on completeness and schema validation:
+**CRITICAL**: Identify whether each solution uses CRDs or standard Kubernetes resources, then apply the appropriate scoring range:
+
+### For CRD/Custom Resource Solutions:
+- **90-100**: CRD that clearly addresses user intent - operators provide higher-level abstractions and automatic resource management
+- **70-89**: CRD with partial relevance to user intent - may work but not ideal fit
+- **30-69**: CRD with limited relevance - significant gaps for this use case
+- **0-29**: CRD completely irrelevant to user intent
+
+### For Standard Kubernetes Resource Solutions:
+- **80-89**: Standard resource combination that fully addresses user intent
+- **60-79**: Standard resources with minor gaps or additional complexity  
+- **30-59**: Standard resources with significant limitations - major gaps in functionality
+- **0-29**: Standard resources poorly suited for this intent
+
+**Rationale**: CRDs get preference when relevant because operators provide domain expertise and simplified management. Standard resources remain reliable when no suitable CRDs exist.
 
-- **90-100**: Complete solution, schema fields directly support ALL requirements
-- **70-89**: Good solution, schema fields support most requirements with minor gaps
-- **50-69**: Partial solution, schema fields support some requirements but missing others
-- **30-49**: Incomplete solution, schema fields only partially support requirements
-- **0-29**: Poor fit, schema fields don't meaningfully support the requirements
+**IMPORTANT**: Never score a CRD in the 80-89 range (reserved for standard resources) or standard resources in the 90-100 range (reserved for CRDs).
 
 ## Response Format
 
@@ -39,18 +51,37 @@ Score solutions based on completeness and schema validation:
 {
   "solutions": [
     {
-      "type": "single|combination",
+      "type": "combination",
       "resources": [
         {
           "kind": "Deployment",
           "apiVersion": "apps/v1",
           "group": "apps"
+        },
+        {
+          "kind": "Service",
+          "apiVersion": "v1",
+          "group": ""
         }
       ],
-      "score": 85,
-      "description": "Brief description of this solution",
-      "reasons": ["reason1", "reason2"],
+      "score": 95,
+      "description": "Complete application deployment with networking",
+      "reasons": ["Provides full application lifecycle", "Includes network access"],
       "analysis": "Detailed explanation of schema analysis and why this solution meets the user's needs"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "single",
+      "resources": [
+        {
+          "kind": "Deployment",
+          "apiVersion": "apps/v1",
+          "group": "apps"
+        }
+      ],
+      "score": 75,
+      "description": "Basic application deployment",
+      "reasons": ["Simple deployment option", "Lower complexity"],
+      "analysis": "Alternative approach with reduced functionality but simpler setup"
     }
   ]
 }