@vellumai/assistant 0.4.49 → 0.4.50

package/src/__tests__/session-conflict-gate.test.ts

@@ -1,1228 +0,0 @@
-import { beforeEach, describe, expect, mock, test } from "bun:test";
-
-import type { AgentEvent } from "../agent/loop.js";
-import type { ServerMessage } from "../daemon/message-protocol.js";
-import type { Message, ProviderResponse } from "../providers/types.js";
-
-let runCalls: Message[][] = [];
-let resolverCallCount = 0;
-let conflictScopeCalls: string[] = [];
-let memoryEnabled = true;
-let resolveConflictCalls: Array<{
-  id: string;
-  input: { status: string; resolutionNote?: string | null };
-}> = [];
-let pendingConflicts: Array<{
-  id: string;
-  scopeId: string;
-  existingItemId: string;
-  candidateItemId: string;
-  relationship: string;
-  status: "pending_clarification";
-  clarificationQuestion: string | null;
-  resolutionNote: string | null;
-  lastAskedAt: number | null;
-  resolvedAt: number | null;
-  createdAt: number;
-  updatedAt: number;
-  existingStatement: string;
-  candidateStatement: string;
-  existingKind: string;
-  candidateKind: string;
-  existingVerificationState: string;
-  candidateVerificationState: string;
-}> = [];
-
-let resolverResult: {
-  resolution: "keep_existing" | "keep_candidate" | "merge" | "still_unclear";
-  strategy: "heuristic" | "llm" | "llm_timeout" | "llm_error" | "no_llm_key";
-  resolvedStatement: string | null;
-  explanation: string;
-} = {
-  resolution: "still_unclear",
-  strategy: "heuristic",
-  resolvedStatement: null,
-  explanation: "Need user clarification.",
-};
-
-const persistedMessages: Array<{
-  id: string;
-  role: string;
-  content: string;
-  createdAt: number;
-}> = [];
-
-function makeMockLogger(): Record<string, unknown> {
-  const logger: Record<string, unknown> = {};
-  logger.child = () => logger;
-  logger.debug = () => {};
-  logger.info = () => {};
-  logger.warn = () => {};
-  logger.error = () => {};
-  return logger;
-}
-
-mock.module("../util/logger.js", () => ({
-  getLogger: () => makeMockLogger(),
-}));
-
-mock.module("../util/platform.js", () => ({
-  getDataDir: () => "/tmp",
-}));
-
-mock.module("../workspace/turn-commit.js", () => ({
-  commitTurnChanges: async () => {},
-}));
-
-mock.module("../workspace/git-service.js", () => ({
-  getWorkspaceGitService: () => ({
-    ensureInitialized: async () => {},
-  }),
-}));
-
-mock.module("../memory/guardian-action-store.js", () => ({
-  getPendingDeliveryByConversation: () => null,
-  getGuardianActionRequest: () => null,
-  resolveGuardianActionRequest: () => {},
-}));
-
-mock.module("../providers/registry.js", () => ({
-  getProvider: () => ({ name: "mock-provider" }),
-  initializeProviders: () => {},
-}));
-
-mock.module("../config/loader.js", () => ({
-  getConfig: () => ({
-    ui: {},
-
-    provider: "mock-provider",
-    maxTokens: 4096,
-    thinking: false,
-    contextWindow: {
-      enabled: true,
-      maxInputTokens: 100000,
-      targetBudgetRatio: 0.30,
-      compactThreshold: 0.8,      summaryBudgetRatio: 0.05,
-      overflowRecovery: {
-        enabled: true,
-        safetyMarginRatio: 0.05,
-        maxAttempts: 3,
-        interactiveLatestTurnCompression: "summarize",
-        nonInteractiveLatestTurnCompression: "truncate",
-      },
-    },
-    rateLimit: { maxRequestsPerMinute: 0, maxTokensPerSession: 0 },
-    apiKeys: {},
-    daemon: {
-      startupSocketWaitMs: 5000,
-      stopTimeoutMs: 5000,
-      sigkillGracePeriodMs: 2000,
-      titleGenerationMaxTokens: 30,
-      standaloneRecording: true,
-    },
-    memory: {
-      enabled: memoryEnabled,
-      retrieval: {
-        injectionStrategy: "prepend_user_block",
-        dynamicBudget: {
-          enabled: false,
-          minInjectTokens: 1200,
-          maxInjectTokens: 10000,
-          targetHeadroomTokens: 10000,
-        },
-      },
-      conflicts: {
-        enabled: true,
-        gateMode: "soft",
-        resolverLlmTimeoutMs: 250,
-        relevanceThreshold: 0.2,
-        conflictableKinds: [
-          "preference",
-          "profile",
-          "constraint",
-          "instruction",
-          "style",
-        ],
-      },
-    },
-  }),
-  loadRawConfig: () => ({}),
-  saveRawConfig: () => {},
-  invalidateConfigCache: () => {},
-}));
-
-mock.module("../prompts/system-prompt.js", () => ({
-  buildSystemPrompt: () => "system prompt",
-}));
-
-mock.module("../config/skills.js", () => ({
-  loadSkillCatalog: () => [],
-  loadSkillBySelector: () => ({ skill: null }),
-  ensureSkillIcon: async () => null,
-}));
-
-mock.module("../config/skill-state.js", () => ({
-  resolveSkillStates: () => [],
-}));
-
-mock.module("../skills/slash-commands.js", () => ({
-  buildInvocableSlashCatalog: () => new Map(),
-  resolveSlashSkillCommand: () => ({ kind: "not_slash" }),
-  rewriteKnownSlashCommandPrompt: () => "",
-  parseSlashCandidate: () => ({ kind: "not_slash" }),
-}));
-
-mock.module("../permissions/trust-store.js", () => ({
-  addRule: () => {},
-  findHighestPriorityRule: () => null,
-  clearCache: () => {},
-}));
-
-mock.module("../security/secret-allowlist.js", () => ({
-  resetAllowlist: () => {},
-}));
-
-mock.module("../memory/conversation-crud.js", () => ({
-  getConversationThreadType: () => "default",
-  setConversationOriginChannelIfUnset: () => {},
-  provenanceFromTrustContext: () => ({
-    source: "user",
-    trustContext: undefined,
-  }),
-  getConversationOriginInterface: () => null,
-  getConversationOriginChannel: () => null,
-  getMessages: () => persistedMessages,
-  getConversation: () => ({
-    id: "conv-1",
-    contextSummary: null,
-    contextCompactedMessageCount: 0,
-    contextCompactedAt: null,
-    totalInputTokens: 0,
-    totalOutputTokens: 0,
-    totalEstimatedCost: 0,
-  }),
-  addMessage: (_conversationId: string, role: string, content: string) => {
-    const row = {
-      id: `msg-${persistedMessages.length + 1}`,
-      role,
-      content,
-      createdAt: Date.now(),
-    };
-    persistedMessages.push(row);
-    return { id: row.id };
-  },
-  updateConversationUsage: () => {},
-  updateConversationTitle: () => {},
-  updateConversationContextWindow: () => {},
-  deleteMessageById: () => ({ segmentIds: [], orphanedItemIds: [] }),
-  deleteLastExchange: () => 0,
-}));
-
-mock.module("../memory/conversation-queries.js", () => ({
-  isLastUserMessageToolResult: () => false,
-}));
-
-mock.module("../memory/attachments-store.js", () => ({
-  uploadAttachment: () => ({ id: "att-1" }),
-  linkAttachmentToMessage: () => {},
-}));
-
-mock.module("../memory/retriever.js", () => ({
-  buildMemoryRecall: async () => ({
-    enabled: true,
-    degraded: false,
-    reason: null,
-    provider: "mock",
-    model: "mock",
-    injectedText: "",
-    lexicalHits: 0,
-    semanticHits: 0,
-    recencyHits: 0,
-    entityHits: 0,
-    relationSeedEntityCount: 0,
-    relationTraversedEdgeCount: 0,
-    relationNeighborEntityCount: 0,
-    relationExpandedItemCount: 0,
-    earlyTerminated: false,
-    mergedCount: 0,
-    selectedCount: 0,
-    rerankApplied: false,
-    injectedTokens: 0,
-    latencyMs: 0,
-    topCandidates: [],
-  }),
-  injectMemoryRecallIntoUserMessage: (msg: Message) => msg,
-  injectMemoryRecallAsSeparateMessage: (msgs: Message[]) => msgs,
-  stripMemoryRecallMessages: (msgs: Message[]) => msgs,
-}));
-
-mock.module("../context/window-manager.js", () => ({
-  ContextWindowManager: class {
-    constructor() {}
-    shouldCompact() {
-      return { needed: false, estimatedTokens: 0 };
-    }
-    async maybeCompact() {
-      return { compacted: false };
-    }
-  },
-  createContextSummaryMessage: () => ({
-    role: "user",
-    content: [{ type: "text", text: "summary" }],
-  }),
-  getSummaryFromContextMessage: () => null,
-}));
-
-mock.module("../memory/conflict-store.js", () => ({
-  listPendingConflictDetails: (scopeId: string) => {
-    conflictScopeCalls.push(scopeId);
-    return pendingConflicts;
-  },
-  applyConflictResolution: () => true,
-  resolveConflict: (
-    id: string,
-    input: { status: string; resolutionNote?: string | null },
-  ) => {
-    resolveConflictCalls.push({ id, input });
-    // Remove dismissed conflicts so the second listPendingConflictDetails call
-    // reflects the dismissal (mirrors real DB behavior).
-    if (input.status === "dismissed") {
-      const idx = pendingConflicts.findIndex((c) => c.id === id);
-      if (idx !== -1) pendingConflicts.splice(idx, 1);
-    }
-    return null;
-  },
-}));
-
-mock.module("../memory/clarification-resolver.js", () => ({
-  resolveConflictClarification: async () => {
-    resolverCallCount += 1;
-    return resolverResult;
-  },
-}));
-
-mock.module("../memory/admin.js", () => ({
-  getMemoryConflictAndCleanupStats: () => ({
-    conflicts: { pending: 0, resolved: 0, oldestPendingAgeMs: null },
-    cleanup: {
-      resolvedBacklog: 0,
-      supersededBacklog: 0,
-      resolvedCompleted24h: 0,
-      supersededCompleted24h: 0,
-    },
-  }),
-}));
-
-mock.module("../memory/llm-usage-store.js", () => ({
-  recordUsageEvent: () => ({ id: "usage-1", createdAt: Date.now() }),
-}));
-
-mock.module("../agent/loop.js", () => ({
-  AgentLoop: class {
-    constructor() {}
-    async run(
-      messages: Message[],
-      onEvent: (event: AgentEvent) => void,
-    ): Promise<Message[]> {
-      runCalls.push(messages);
-      const assistantMessage: Message = {
-        role: "assistant",
-        content: [{ type: "text", text: "normal assistant answer" }],
-      };
-      onEvent({
-        type: "usage",
-        inputTokens: 10,
-        outputTokens: 5,
-        model: "mock",
-        providerDurationMs: 10,
-      });
-      onEvent({ type: "message_complete", message: assistantMessage });
-      return [...messages, assistantMessage];
-    }
-  },
-}));
-mock.module("../memory/canonical-guardian-store.js", () => ({
-  listPendingCanonicalGuardianRequestsByDestinationConversation: () => [],
-  listCanonicalGuardianRequests: () => [],
-  listPendingRequestsByConversationScope: () => [],
-  createCanonicalGuardianRequest: () => ({
-    id: "mock-cg-id",
-    code: "MOCK",
-    status: "pending",
-  }),
-  getCanonicalGuardianRequest: () => null,
-  getCanonicalGuardianRequestByCode: () => null,
-  updateCanonicalGuardianRequest: () => {},
-  resolveCanonicalGuardianRequest: () => {},
-  createCanonicalGuardianDelivery: () => ({ id: "mock-cgd-id" }),
-  listCanonicalGuardianDeliveries: () => [],
-  listPendingCanonicalGuardianRequestsByDestinationChat: () => [],
-  updateCanonicalGuardianDelivery: () => {},
-  generateCanonicalRequestCode: () => "MOCK-CODE",
-}));
-
-import { Session, type SessionMemoryPolicy } from "../daemon/session.js";
-import {
-  ConflictGate,
-  looksLikeClarificationReply,
-} from "../daemon/session-conflict-gate.js";
-
-function makeSession(memoryPolicy?: SessionMemoryPolicy): Session {
-  const provider = {
-    name: "mock",
-    async sendMessage(): Promise<ProviderResponse> {
-      return {
-        content: [],
-        model: "mock",
-        usage: { inputTokens: 0, outputTokens: 0 },
-        stopReason: "end_turn",
-      };
-    },
-  };
-  const session = new Session(
-    "conv-1",
-    provider,
-    "system prompt",
-    4096,
-    () => {},
-    "/tmp",
-    undefined,
-    memoryPolicy,
-  );
-  session.setTrustContext({ trustClass: "guardian", sourceChannel: "vellum" });
-  return session;
-}
-
-function extractText(message: Message): string {
-  return message.content
-    .filter((block) => block.type === "text")
-    .map((block) => (block as { type: "text"; text: string }).text)
-    .join("\n");
-}
-
-describe("Session conflict soft gate (non-interruptive)", () => {
-  beforeEach(() => {
-    runCalls = [];
-    resolverCallCount = 0;
-    conflictScopeCalls = [];
-    resolveConflictCalls = [];
-    memoryEnabled = true;
-    pendingConflicts = [];
-    persistedMessages.length = 0;
-    resolverResult = {
-      resolution: "still_unclear",
-      strategy: "heuristic",
-      resolvedStatement: null,
-      explanation: "Need user clarification.",
-    };
-  });
-
-  test("relevant conflict does not produce user-facing clarification — agent loop runs normally", async () => {
-    pendingConflicts = [
-      {
-        id: "conflict-relevant",
-        scopeId: "default",
-        existingItemId: "existing-a",
-        candidateItemId: "candidate-a",
-        relationship: "ambiguous_contradiction",
-        status: "pending_clarification",
-        clarificationQuestion: "Do you want React or Vue for frontend work?",
-        resolutionNote: null,
-        lastAskedAt: null,
-        resolvedAt: null,
-        createdAt: 1,
-        updatedAt: 1,
-        existingStatement: "Use React for frontend work.",
-        candidateStatement: "Use Vue for frontend work.",
-        existingKind: "preference",
-        candidateKind: "preference",
-        existingVerificationState: "user_reported",
-        candidateVerificationState: "user_reported",
-      },
-    ];
-
-    const session = makeSession();
-    await session.loadFromDb();
-
-    const events: ServerMessage[] = [];
-    await session.processMessage(
-      "Should I use React or Vue here?",
-      [],
-      (event) => events.push(event),
-    );
-
-    // Agent loop runs — no clarification prompt blocks it
-    expect(runCalls).toHaveLength(1);
-    // No clarification text delta emitted
-    const textDeltas = events.filter(
-      (event) => event.type === "assistant_text_delta",
-    );
-    for (const delta of textDeltas) {
-      if (delta.type === "assistant_text_delta") {
-        expect(delta.text).not.toContain("conflicting");
-        expect(delta.text).not.toContain("React or Vue");
-      }
-    }
-    expect(events.some((event) => event.type === "message_complete")).toBe(
-      true,
-    );
-  });
-
-  test("irrelevant conflict does not inject side-question and agent loop runs normally", async () => {
-    pendingConflicts = [
-      {
-        id: "conflict-irrelevant-silent",
-        scopeId: "default",
-        existingItemId: "existing-b",
-        candidateItemId: "candidate-b",
-        relationship: "ambiguous_contradiction",
-        status: "pending_clarification",
-        clarificationQuestion: "Should I assume Postgres or MySQL?",
-        resolutionNote: null,
-        lastAskedAt: null,
-        resolvedAt: null,
-        createdAt: 1,
-        updatedAt: 1,
-        existingStatement: "Use Postgres as the default database.",
-        candidateStatement: "Use MySQL as the default database.",
-        existingKind: "preference",
-        candidateKind: "preference",
-        existingVerificationState: "user_reported",
-        candidateVerificationState: "user_reported",
-      },
-    ];
-    const session = makeSession();
-    await session.loadFromDb();
-
-    const events: ServerMessage[] = [];
-    await session.processMessage(
-      "How do I set up pre-commit hooks?",
-      [],
-      (event) => events.push(event),
-    );
-
-    // Agent loop runs without conflict side-question injection
-    expect(runCalls).toHaveLength(1);
-    const injectedUser = runCalls[0][runCalls[0].length - 1];
-    expect(injectedUser.role).toBe("user");
-    const injectedText = extractText(injectedUser);
-    expect(injectedText).not.toContain("Memory clarification request");
-    expect(resolverCallCount).toBe(0);
-    expect(events.some((event) => event.type === "message_complete")).toBe(
-      true,
-    );
-  });
-
-  test("topically relevant explicit clarification reply resolves conflict", async () => {
-    pendingConflicts = [
-      {
-        id: "conflict-resolve",
-        scopeId: "default",
-        existingItemId: "existing-resolve",
-        candidateItemId: "candidate-resolve",
-        relationship: "ambiguous_contradiction",
-        status: "pending_clarification",
-        clarificationQuestion: "Should I assume Postgres or MySQL?",
-        resolutionNote: null,
-        lastAskedAt: null,
-        resolvedAt: null,
-        createdAt: 1,
-        updatedAt: 1,
-        existingStatement: "Use Postgres as the default database.",
-        candidateStatement: "Use MySQL as the default database.",
-        existingKind: "preference",
-        candidateKind: "preference",
-        existingVerificationState: "user_reported",
-        candidateVerificationState: "user_reported",
-      },
-    ];
-
-    resolverResult = {
-      resolution: "keep_candidate",
-      strategy: "heuristic",
-      resolvedStatement: null,
-      explanation: "User prefers MySQL.",
-    };
-
-    const session = makeSession();
-    await session.loadFromDb();
-
-    // "use MySQL" is a clarification reply (action cue "use") with topical
-    // relevance to the conflict statements.
-    await session.processMessage("use MySQL", [], () => {});
-
-    expect(resolverCallCount).toBe(1);
-    // Agent loop still runs — no blocking
-    expect(runCalls).toHaveLength(1);
-  });
-
-  test("non-clarification message does not attempt resolution", async () => {
-    pendingConflicts = [
-      {
-        id: "conflict-no-resolve",
-        scopeId: "default",
-        existingItemId: "existing-nr",
-        candidateItemId: "candidate-nr",
-        relationship: "ambiguous_contradiction",
-        status: "pending_clarification",
-        clarificationQuestion: "Should I assume Postgres or MySQL?",
-        resolutionNote: null,
-        lastAskedAt: null,
-        resolvedAt: null,
-        createdAt: 1,
-        updatedAt: 1,
-        existingStatement: "Use Postgres as the default database.",
-        candidateStatement: "Use MySQL as the default database.",
-        existingKind: "preference",
-        candidateKind: "preference",
-        existingVerificationState: "user_reported",
-        candidateVerificationState: "user_reported",
-      },
-    ];
-
-    const session = makeSession();
-    await session.loadFromDb();
-
-    await session.processMessage("What's new in Bun?", [], () => {});
-
-    expect(resolverCallCount).toBe(0);
-    expect(runCalls).toHaveLength(1);
-  });
-
-  test("clarification reply without topical relevance does not resolve conflict", async () => {
-    pendingConflicts = [
-      {
-        id: "conflict-no-overlap",
-        scopeId: "default",
-        existingItemId: "existing-no",
-        candidateItemId: "candidate-no",
-        relationship: "ambiguous_contradiction",
-        status: "pending_clarification",
-        clarificationQuestion: "Should I assume Postgres or MySQL?",
-        resolutionNote: null,
-        lastAskedAt: null,
-        resolvedAt: null,
-        createdAt: 1,
-        updatedAt: 1,
-        existingStatement: "Use Postgres as the default database.",
-        candidateStatement: "Use MySQL as the default database.",
-        existingKind: "preference",
-        candidateKind: "preference",
-        existingVerificationState: "user_reported",
-        candidateVerificationState: "user_reported",
-      },
-    ];
-
-    const session = makeSession();
-    await session.loadFromDb();
-
-    // "keep it" is a clarification reply but has zero topical overlap
-    // with Postgres/MySQL conflict statements
-    await session.processMessage("keep it", [], () => {});
-
-    expect(resolverCallCount).toBe(0);
-    expect(runCalls).toHaveLength(1);
-  });
-
-  test("passes session scopeId through to conflict store queries", async () => {
-    pendingConflicts = [
-      {
-        id: "conflict-scoped",
-        scopeId: "thread:private-abc",
-        existingItemId: "existing-scoped",
-        candidateItemId: "candidate-scoped",
-        relationship: "ambiguous_contradiction",
-        status: "pending_clarification",
-        clarificationQuestion: "Do you prefer tabs or spaces?",
-        resolutionNote: null,
-        lastAskedAt: null,
-        resolvedAt: null,
-        createdAt: 1,
-        updatedAt: 1,
-        existingStatement: "Use tabs for indentation.",
-        candidateStatement: "Use spaces for indentation.",
-        existingKind: "preference",
-        candidateKind: "preference",
-        existingVerificationState: "user_reported",
-        candidateVerificationState: "user_reported",
-      },
-    ];
-
-    const session = makeSession({
-      scopeId: "thread:private-abc",
-      includeDefaultFallback: false,
-      strictSideEffects: true,
-    });
-    await session.loadFromDb();
-
-    await session.processMessage("tabs or spaces?", [], () => {});
-
-    // Every call to listPendingConflictDetails should use the session's scopeId
-    expect(conflictScopeCalls.length).toBeGreaterThan(0);
-    expect(conflictScopeCalls.every((s) => s === "thread:private-abc")).toBe(
-      true,
-    );
-    // No calls should have used the hardcoded 'default'
-    expect(conflictScopeCalls).not.toContain("default");
-  });
-
-  test('default session uses "default" scopeId for conflict queries', async () => {
-    pendingConflicts = [];
-
-    const session = makeSession();
-    await session.loadFromDb();
-
-    await session.processMessage("hello", [], () => {});
-
-    // With no custom policy, scopeId should default to 'default'
-    expect(conflictScopeCalls.every((s) => s === "default")).toBe(true);
-  });
-
-  test("skips conflict gate when top-level memory.enabled is false", async () => {
-    memoryEnabled = false;
-    pendingConflicts = [
-      {
-        id: "conflict-disabled",
-        scopeId: "default",
-        existingItemId: "existing-d",
-        candidateItemId: "candidate-d",
-        relationship: "ambiguous_contradiction",
-        status: "pending_clarification",
-        clarificationQuestion: "Do you want React or Vue for frontend work?",
-        resolutionNote: null,
-        lastAskedAt: null,
-        resolvedAt: null,
-        createdAt: 1,
-        updatedAt: 1,
-        existingStatement: "Use React for frontend work.",
-        candidateStatement: "Use Vue for frontend work.",
-        existingKind: "preference",
-        candidateKind: "preference",
-        existingVerificationState: "user_reported",
-        candidateVerificationState: "user_reported",
-      },
-    ];
-
-    const session = makeSession();
-    await session.loadFromDb();
-
-    const events: ServerMessage[] = [];
-    await session.processMessage(
-      "Should I use React or Vue here?",
-      [],
-      (event) => events.push(event),
-    );
-
-    // Agent loop should run normally — conflict gate should be bypassed
-    expect(runCalls).toHaveLength(1);
-    expect(resolverCallCount).toBe(0);
-  });
-
-  test("pending transient conflict is dismissed and not resolved", async () => {
-    pendingConflicts = [
-      {
-        id: "conflict-transient",
-        scopeId: "default",
-        existingItemId: "existing-transient",
-        candidateItemId: "candidate-transient",
-        relationship: "ambiguous_contradiction",
-        status: "pending_clarification",
-        clarificationQuestion: "Which PR should we track?",
-        resolutionNote: null,
-        lastAskedAt: null,
-        resolvedAt: null,
-        createdAt: 1,
-        updatedAt: 1,
-        existingStatement: "Track PR #5526 for review.",
-        candidateStatement: "Track PR #5525 for review.",
-        existingKind: "instruction",
-        candidateKind: "instruction",
-        existingVerificationState: "user_reported",
-        candidateVerificationState: "user_reported",
-      },
-    ];
-
-    const session = makeSession();
-    await session.loadFromDb();
-
-    const events: ServerMessage[] = [];
-    await session.processMessage("Check latest PRs", [], (event) =>
-      events.push(event),
-    );
-
-    // Should run normal agent loop
-    expect(runCalls).toHaveLength(1);
-    // The conflict should have been dismissed
-    expect(resolveConflictCalls).toEqual([
-      {
-        id: "conflict-transient",
-        input: {
-          status: "dismissed",
-          resolutionNote:
-            "Dismissed by conflict policy (transient/non-durable).",
-        },
-      },
-    ]);
-  });
-
-  test("incoherent conflict (zero statement overlap) is dismissed", async () => {
-    pendingConflicts = [
-      {
-        id: "conflict-incoherent",
-        scopeId: "default",
-        existingItemId: "existing-incoherent",
-        candidateItemId: "candidate-incoherent",
-        relationship: "ambiguous_contradiction",
-        status: "pending_clarification",
-        clarificationQuestion:
-          'I have conflicting notes: "The default model for the summarize CLI is google/gemini-3-flash-preview" vs "User\'s favorite color is blue." Which one is correct?',
-        resolutionNote: null,
-        lastAskedAt: null,
-        resolvedAt: null,
-        createdAt: 1,
-        updatedAt: 1,
-        existingStatement:
-          "The default model for the summarize CLI is google/gemini-3-flash-preview.",
-        candidateStatement: "User's favorite color is blue.",
-        existingKind: "preference",
-        candidateKind: "preference",
-        existingVerificationState: "user_reported",
-        candidateVerificationState: "user_reported",
-      },
-    ];
-
-    const session = makeSession();
-    await session.loadFromDb();
-
-    const events: ServerMessage[] = [];
-    await session.processMessage("my favorite color is white", [], (event) =>
-      events.push(event),
-    );
-
-    // Should run normal agent loop
-    expect(runCalls).toHaveLength(1);
-    // The conflict should have been dismissed as incoherent
-    expect(resolveConflictCalls).toEqual([
-      {
-        id: "conflict-incoherent",
-        input: {
-          status: "dismissed",
-          resolutionNote:
-            "Dismissed by conflict policy (incoherent — zero statement overlap).",
-        },
-      },
-    ]);
-  });
-
-  test("non-user-evidenced conflict (assistant-inferred only) is dismissed", async () => {
-    pendingConflicts = [
-      {
-        id: "conflict-no-user-evidence",
-        scopeId: "default",
-        existingItemId: "existing-inferred",
-        candidateItemId: "candidate-inferred",
-        relationship: "ambiguous_contradiction",
-        status: "pending_clarification",
-        clarificationQuestion: "Do you want React or Vue?",
-        resolutionNote: null,
-        lastAskedAt: null,
-        resolvedAt: null,
-        createdAt: 1,
-        updatedAt: 1,
-        existingStatement: "Use React for frontend work.",
-        candidateStatement: "Use Vue for frontend work.",
-        existingKind: "preference",
-        candidateKind: "preference",
-        existingVerificationState: "assistant_inferred",
-        candidateVerificationState: "assistant_inferred",
-      },
-    ];
-
-    const session = makeSession();
-    await session.loadFromDb();
-
-    await session.processMessage("Should I use React or Vue?", [], () => {});
-
-    // Agent loop runs normally
-    expect(runCalls).toHaveLength(1);
-    // Conflict is dismissed because neither side has user-evidenced provenance
-    expect(resolveConflictCalls).toEqual([
-      {
-        id: "conflict-no-user-evidence",
-        input: {
-          status: "dismissed",
-          resolutionNote:
-            "Dismissed by conflict policy (no user-evidenced provenance).",
-        },
-      },
-    ]);
-  });
-
-  test("user-evidenced conflict is not dismissed when one side has user provenance", async () => {
-    pendingConflicts = [
-      {
-        id: "conflict-user-evidenced",
-        scopeId: "default",
-        existingItemId: "existing-ue",
-        candidateItemId: "candidate-ue",
-        relationship: "ambiguous_contradiction",
-        status: "pending_clarification",
-        clarificationQuestion: "Do you want React or Vue?",
-        resolutionNote: null,
-        lastAskedAt: null,
-        resolvedAt: null,
-        createdAt: 1,
-        updatedAt: 1,
-        existingStatement: "Use React for frontend work.",
-        candidateStatement: "Use Vue for frontend work.",
-        existingKind: "preference",
-        candidateKind: "preference",
-        existingVerificationState: "user_reported",
-        candidateVerificationState: "assistant_inferred",
-      },
-    ];
-
-    const session = makeSession();
-    await session.loadFromDb();
-
-    await session.processMessage("Should I use React or Vue?", [], () => {});
-
-    // Agent loop runs normally (no blocking)
-    expect(runCalls).toHaveLength(1);
-    // Conflict should NOT be dismissed — has user-evidenced provenance
-    expect(resolveConflictCalls).toEqual([]);
-  });
-
-  test("regression: OAuth/Gmail-style conflicting statements with command request produces no clarification", async () => {
-    pendingConflicts = [
-      {
-        id: "conflict-oauth-gmail",
-        scopeId: "default",
-        existingItemId: "existing-oauth",
-        candidateItemId: "candidate-oauth",
-        relationship: "ambiguous_contradiction",
-        status: "pending_clarification",
-        clarificationQuestion:
-          "Which OAuth provider should be the default for email integration?",
-        resolutionNote: null,
-        lastAskedAt: null,
-        resolvedAt: null,
-        createdAt: 1,
-        updatedAt: 1,
-        existingStatement:
-          "Gmail OAuth is the default email integration provider.",
-        candidateStatement:
-          "Microsoft OAuth is the default email integration provider.",
-        existingKind: "preference",
-        candidateKind: "preference",
-        existingVerificationState: "user_reported",
-        candidateVerificationState: "user_reported",
-      },
-    ];
-
-    const session = makeSession();
-    await session.loadFromDb();
-
-    const events: ServerMessage[] = [];
-    // A command request that is unrelated to the conflict
-    await session.processMessage(
-      "Set up a new Slack channel for the team",
-      [],
-      (event) => events.push(event),
-    );
-
-    // Agent loop runs — no clarification prompt produced
-    expect(runCalls).toHaveLength(1);
-    expect(resolverCallCount).toBe(0);
-    // No clarification text in any event
-    for (const event of events) {
-      if (event.type === "assistant_text_delta") {
-        expect(event.text).not.toContain("OAuth");
-        expect(event.text).not.toContain("Gmail");
-        expect(event.text).not.toContain("conflicting");
-      }
-    }
-    // Conflict should NOT be dismissed (it's user-evidenced and actionable)
-    expect(resolveConflictCalls).toEqual([]);
-    expect(events.some((event) => event.type === "message_complete")).toBe(
-      true,
-    );
-  });
-});
-
-describe("looksLikeClarificationReply", () => {
-  test("accepts action + direction combo", () => {
-    expect(looksLikeClarificationReply("keep the new one")).toBe(true);
-    expect(looksLikeClarificationReply("use the existing")).toBe(true);
-    expect(looksLikeClarificationReply("go with option A")).toBe(true);
-  });
-
-  test("accepts directional-only replies", () => {
-    expect(looksLikeClarificationReply("both")).toBe(true);
-    expect(looksLikeClarificationReply("option B")).toBe(true);
-    expect(looksLikeClarificationReply("new one")).toBe(true);
-    expect(looksLikeClarificationReply("the existing one")).toBe(true);
-    expect(looksLikeClarificationReply("merge them")).toBe(true);
-  });
-
-  test("accepts action-only replies", () => {
-    expect(looksLikeClarificationReply("keep it")).toBe(true);
-    expect(looksLikeClarificationReply("use that")).toBe(true);
-  });
-
-  test("rejects questions with question mark", () => {
-    expect(looksLikeClarificationReply("what's new in Bun?")).toBe(false);
-    expect(looksLikeClarificationReply("which option?")).toBe(false);
-  });
-
-  test("rejects questions without question mark", () => {
-    expect(looksLikeClarificationReply("what's new in Bun")).toBe(false);
-    expect(looksLikeClarificationReply("how do I use option A")).toBe(false);
-    expect(looksLikeClarificationReply("where is the new config")).toBe(false);
-  });
-
-  test("rejects questions with Unicode smart/curly apostrophes", () => {
-    // U+2019 RIGHT SINGLE QUOTATION MARK (common on macOS/iOS keyboards)
-    expect(looksLikeClarificationReply("what\u2019s new in Bun")).toBe(false);
-    expect(looksLikeClarificationReply("where\u2019s the new config")).toBe(
-      false,
-    );
-    // U+2018 LEFT SINGLE QUOTATION MARK
-    expect(looksLikeClarificationReply("who\u2018s option")).toBe(false);
-  });
-
-  test("accepts words that share a question-word prefix but are not questions", () => {
-    // "whichever" starts with "which", "however" starts with "how", etc.
-    // These should NOT be rejected by the question-word gate.
-    expect(looksLikeClarificationReply("whichever option")).toBe(true);
-    expect(looksLikeClarificationReply("however you want")).toBe(true);
-  });
-
-  test("rejects longer direction-only messages (false-positive prevention)", () => {
-    // These contain directional cues but no action verb and are > 4 words,
-    // so they are likely unrelated statements, not clarification replies.
-    expect(looksLikeClarificationReply("try the old approach instead")).toBe(
-      false,
-    );
-    expect(looksLikeClarificationReply("I started a new project today")).toBe(
-      false,
-    );
-    expect(
-      looksLikeClarificationReply("check out the latest release notes"),
-    ).toBe(false);
-  });
-
-  test("rejects long statements", () => {
-    expect(
-      looksLikeClarificationReply(
-        "I was thinking about this and I believe we should keep the new one because it is better",
-      ),
-    ).toBe(false);
-  });
-
-  test("rejects messages with no cue words", () => {
-    expect(looksLikeClarificationReply("hello world")).toBe(false);
-    expect(looksLikeClarificationReply("sounds good")).toBe(false);
-  });
-});
-
-describe("ConflictGate (unit)", () => {
-  const baseConfig = {
-    enabled: true,
-    gateMode: "soft" as const,
-    relevanceThreshold: 0.2,
-    resolverLlmTimeoutMs: 250,
-    conflictableKinds: [
-      "preference",
-      "profile",
-      "constraint",
-      "instruction",
-      "style",
-    ] as readonly string[],
-  };
-
-  beforeEach(() => {
-    pendingConflicts = [];
-    resolveConflictCalls = [];
-    resolverCallCount = 0;
-    conflictScopeCalls = [];
-    resolverResult = {
-      resolution: "still_unclear",
-      strategy: "heuristic",
-      resolvedStatement: null,
-      explanation: "Need user clarification.",
-    };
-  });
-
-  test("evaluate returns void (never produces user-facing output)", async () => {
-    pendingConflicts = [
-      {
-        id: "conflict-void",
-        scopeId: "default",
-        existingItemId: "existing-void",
-        candidateItemId: "candidate-void",
-        relationship: "ambiguous_contradiction",
-        status: "pending_clarification",
-        clarificationQuestion: "Do you want React or Vue?",
-        resolutionNote: null,
-        lastAskedAt: null,
-        resolvedAt: null,
-        createdAt: 1,
-        updatedAt: 1,
-        existingStatement: "Use React for frontend work.",
-        candidateStatement: "Use Vue for frontend work.",
-        existingKind: "preference",
-        candidateKind: "preference",
-        existingVerificationState: "user_reported",
-        candidateVerificationState: "user_reported",
-      },
-    ];
-
-    const gate = new ConflictGate();
-    const result = await gate.evaluate(
-      "Should I use React or Vue here?",
-      baseConfig,
-    );
-
-    expect(result).toBeUndefined();
-  });
-
-  test("dismisses assistant-inferred-only conflicts via provenance check", async () => {
-    pendingConflicts = [
-      {
-        id: "conflict-inferred-only",
-        scopeId: "default",
-        existingItemId: "existing-inf",
-        candidateItemId: "candidate-inf",
-        relationship: "ambiguous_contradiction",
-        status: "pending_clarification",
-        clarificationQuestion: "Should I assume Postgres or MySQL?",
-        resolutionNote: null,
-        lastAskedAt: null,
-        resolvedAt: null,
-        createdAt: 1,
-        updatedAt: 1,
-        existingStatement: "Use Postgres as the default database.",
-        candidateStatement: "Use MySQL as the default database.",
-        existingKind: "preference",
-        candidateKind: "preference",
-        existingVerificationState: "assistant_inferred",
-        candidateVerificationState: "assistant_inferred",
-      },
-    ];
-
-    const gate = new ConflictGate();
-    await gate.evaluate("anything", baseConfig);
-
-    expect(resolveConflictCalls).toEqual([
-      {
-        id: "conflict-inferred-only",
-        input: {
-          status: "dismissed",
-          resolutionNote:
-            "Dismissed by conflict policy (no user-evidenced provenance).",
-        },
-      },
-    ]);
-  });
-
-  test("keeps user-evidenced conflict actionable", async () => {
-    pendingConflicts = [
-      {
-        id: "conflict-ue",
-        scopeId: "default",
-        existingItemId: "existing-ue2",
-        candidateItemId: "candidate-ue2",
-        relationship: "ambiguous_contradiction",
-        status: "pending_clarification",
-        clarificationQuestion: "Should I assume Postgres or MySQL?",
-        resolutionNote: null,
-        lastAskedAt: null,
-        resolvedAt: null,
-        createdAt: 1,
-        updatedAt: 1,
-        existingStatement: "Use Postgres as the default database.",
-        candidateStatement: "Use MySQL as the default database.",
-        existingKind: "preference",
-        candidateKind: "preference",
-        existingVerificationState: "user_confirmed",
-        candidateVerificationState: "assistant_inferred",
-      },
-    ];
-
-    const gate = new ConflictGate();
-    await gate.evaluate("anything", baseConfig);
-
-    // No dismissal for user-evidenced conflicts
-    expect(resolveConflictCalls).toEqual([]);
-  });
-
-  test("explicit clarification with topical relevance triggers resolver", async () => {
-    pendingConflicts = [
-      {
-        id: "conflict-resolve-unit",
-        scopeId: "default",
-        existingItemId: "existing-ru",
-        candidateItemId: "candidate-ru",
-        relationship: "ambiguous_contradiction",
-        status: "pending_clarification",
-        clarificationQuestion: "Should I assume Postgres or MySQL?",
-        resolutionNote: null,
-        lastAskedAt: null,
-        resolvedAt: null,
-        createdAt: 1,
-        updatedAt: 1,
-        existingStatement: "Use Postgres as the default database.",
-        candidateStatement: "Use MySQL as the default database.",
-        existingKind: "preference",
-        candidateKind: "preference",
-        existingVerificationState: "user_reported",
-        candidateVerificationState: "user_reported",
-      },
-    ];
-
-    resolverResult = {
-      resolution: "keep_existing",
-      strategy: "heuristic",
-      resolvedStatement: null,
-      explanation: "User prefers Postgres.",
-    };
-
-    const gate = new ConflictGate();
-    // "use Postgres" has action cue "use" and topical overlap with "Postgres"
-    await gate.evaluate("use Postgres", baseConfig);
-
-    expect(resolverCallCount).toBe(1);
-  });
-
-  test("clarification reply without topical relevance does not trigger resolver", async () => {
-    pendingConflicts = [
-      {
-        id: "conflict-no-rel",
-        scopeId: "default",
-        existingItemId: "existing-nrel",
-        candidateItemId: "candidate-nrel",
-        relationship: "ambiguous_contradiction",
-        status: "pending_clarification",
-        clarificationQuestion: "Should I assume Postgres or MySQL?",
-        resolutionNote: null,
-        lastAskedAt: null,
-        resolvedAt: null,
-        createdAt: 1,
-        updatedAt: 1,
-        existingStatement: "Use Postgres as the default database.",
-        candidateStatement: "Use MySQL as the default database.",
-        existingKind: "preference",
-        candidateKind: "preference",
-        existingVerificationState: "user_reported",
-        candidateVerificationState: "user_reported",
-      },
-    ];
-
-    const gate = new ConflictGate();
-    // "keep it" looks like clarification but has no topical overlap
-    await gate.evaluate("keep it", baseConfig);
-
-    expect(resolverCallCount).toBe(0);
-  });
-});