@uzysjung/agent-harness 26.158.0 → 26.159.0
This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
- package/README.ko.md +1 -1
- package/README.md +1 -1
- package/dist/{chunk-HHCNPPGS.js → chunk-FTL34NT4.js} +49 -289
- package/dist/chunk-FTL34NT4.js.map +1 -0
- package/dist/index.js +11 -40
- package/dist/index.js.map +1 -1
- package/dist/trust-tier-drift.js +1 -1
- package/package.json +1 -2
- package/templates/agents/strategist.md +10 -0
- package/dist/chunk-HHCNPPGS.js.map +0 -1
- package/scripts/prune-ecc.sh +0 -310
- package/templates/skills/e2e-testing/SKILL.md +0 -326
- package/templates/skills/e2e-testing/agents/openai.yaml +0 -7
- package/templates/skills/investor-materials/SKILL.md +0 -96
- package/templates/skills/investor-outreach/SKILL.md +0 -91
- package/templates/skills/market-research/SKILL.md +0 -75
- package/templates/skills/market-research/agents/openai.yaml +0 -7
- package/templates/skills/nextjs-turbopack/SKILL.md +0 -44
- package/templates/skills/python-patterns/SKILL.md +0 -750
- package/templates/skills/python-testing/SKILL.md +0 -816
|
@@ -1,96 +0,0 @@
|
|
|
1
|
-
---
|
|
2
|
-
name: investor-materials
|
|
3
|
-
description: Create and update pitch decks, one-pagers, investor memos, accelerator applications, financial models, and fundraising materials. Use when the user needs investor-facing documents, projections, use-of-funds tables, milestone plans, or materials that must stay internally consistent across multiple fundraising assets.
|
|
4
|
-
origin: ECC
|
|
5
|
-
---
|
|
6
|
-
|
|
7
|
-
# Investor Materials
|
|
8
|
-
|
|
9
|
-
Build investor-facing materials that are consistent, credible, and easy to defend.
|
|
10
|
-
|
|
11
|
-
## When to Activate
|
|
12
|
-
|
|
13
|
-
- creating or revising a pitch deck
|
|
14
|
-
- writing an investor memo or one-pager
|
|
15
|
-
- building a financial model, milestone plan, or use-of-funds table
|
|
16
|
-
- answering accelerator or incubator application questions
|
|
17
|
-
- aligning multiple fundraising docs around one source of truth
|
|
18
|
-
|
|
19
|
-
## Golden Rule
|
|
20
|
-
|
|
21
|
-
All investor materials must agree with each other.
|
|
22
|
-
|
|
23
|
-
Create or confirm a single source of truth before writing:
|
|
24
|
-
- traction metrics
|
|
25
|
-
- pricing and revenue assumptions
|
|
26
|
-
- raise size and instrument
|
|
27
|
-
- use of funds
|
|
28
|
-
- team bios and titles
|
|
29
|
-
- milestones and timelines
|
|
30
|
-
|
|
31
|
-
If conflicting numbers appear, stop and resolve them before drafting.
|
|
32
|
-
|
|
33
|
-
## Core Workflow
|
|
34
|
-
|
|
35
|
-
1. inventory the canonical facts
|
|
36
|
-
2. identify missing assumptions
|
|
37
|
-
3. choose the asset type
|
|
38
|
-
4. draft the asset with explicit logic
|
|
39
|
-
5. cross-check every number against the source of truth
|
|
40
|
-
|
|
41
|
-
## Asset Guidance
|
|
42
|
-
|
|
43
|
-
### Pitch Deck
|
|
44
|
-
Recommended flow:
|
|
45
|
-
1. company + wedge
|
|
46
|
-
2. problem
|
|
47
|
-
3. solution
|
|
48
|
-
4. product / demo
|
|
49
|
-
5. market
|
|
50
|
-
6. business model
|
|
51
|
-
7. traction
|
|
52
|
-
8. team
|
|
53
|
-
9. competition / differentiation
|
|
54
|
-
10. ask
|
|
55
|
-
11. use of funds / milestones
|
|
56
|
-
12. appendix
|
|
57
|
-
|
|
58
|
-
If the user wants a web-native deck, pair this skill with `frontend-slides`.
|
|
59
|
-
|
|
60
|
-
### One-Pager / Memo
|
|
61
|
-
- state what the company does in one clean sentence
|
|
62
|
-
- show why now
|
|
63
|
-
- include traction and proof points early
|
|
64
|
-
- make the ask precise
|
|
65
|
-
- keep claims easy to verify
|
|
66
|
-
|
|
67
|
-
### Financial Model
|
|
68
|
-
Include:
|
|
69
|
-
- explicit assumptions
|
|
70
|
-
- bear / base / bull cases when useful
|
|
71
|
-
- clean layer-by-layer revenue logic
|
|
72
|
-
- milestone-linked spending
|
|
73
|
-
- sensitivity analysis where the decision hinges on assumptions
|
|
74
|
-
|
|
75
|
-
### Accelerator Applications
|
|
76
|
-
- answer the exact question asked
|
|
77
|
-
- prioritize traction, insight, and team advantage
|
|
78
|
-
- avoid puffery
|
|
79
|
-
- keep internal metrics consistent with the deck and model
|
|
80
|
-
|
|
81
|
-
## Red Flags to Avoid
|
|
82
|
-
|
|
83
|
-
- unverifiable claims
|
|
84
|
-
- fuzzy market sizing without assumptions
|
|
85
|
-
- inconsistent team roles or titles
|
|
86
|
-
- revenue math that does not sum cleanly
|
|
87
|
-
- inflated certainty where assumptions are fragile
|
|
88
|
-
|
|
89
|
-
## Quality Gate
|
|
90
|
-
|
|
91
|
-
Before delivering:
|
|
92
|
-
- every number matches the current source of truth
|
|
93
|
-
- use of funds and revenue layers sum correctly
|
|
94
|
-
- assumptions are visible, not buried
|
|
95
|
-
- the story is clear without hype language
|
|
96
|
-
- the final asset is defensible in a partner meeting
|
|
@@ -1,91 +0,0 @@
|
|
|
1
|
-
---
|
|
2
|
-
name: investor-outreach
|
|
3
|
-
description: Draft cold emails, warm intro blurbs, follow-ups, update emails, and investor communications for fundraising. Use when the user wants outreach to angels, VCs, strategic investors, or accelerators and needs concise, personalized, investor-facing messaging.
|
|
4
|
-
origin: ECC
|
|
5
|
-
---
|
|
6
|
-
|
|
7
|
-
# Investor Outreach
|
|
8
|
-
|
|
9
|
-
Write investor communication that is short, concrete, and easy to act on.
|
|
10
|
-
|
|
11
|
-
## When to Activate
|
|
12
|
-
|
|
13
|
-
- writing a cold email to an investor
|
|
14
|
-
- drafting a warm intro request
|
|
15
|
-
- sending follow-ups after a meeting or no response
|
|
16
|
-
- writing investor updates during a process
|
|
17
|
-
- tailoring outreach based on fund thesis or partner fit
|
|
18
|
-
|
|
19
|
-
## Core Rules
|
|
20
|
-
|
|
21
|
-
1. Personalize every outbound message.
|
|
22
|
-
2. Keep the ask low-friction.
|
|
23
|
-
3. Use proof instead of adjectives.
|
|
24
|
-
4. Stay concise.
|
|
25
|
-
5. Never send copy that could go to any investor.
|
|
26
|
-
|
|
27
|
-
## Voice Handling
|
|
28
|
-
|
|
29
|
-
If the user's voice matters, run `brand-voice` first and reuse its `VOICE PROFILE`.
|
|
30
|
-
This skill should keep the investor-specific structure and ask discipline, not recreate its own parallel voice system.
|
|
31
|
-
|
|
32
|
-
## Hard Bans
|
|
33
|
-
|
|
34
|
-
Delete and rewrite any of these:
|
|
35
|
-
- "I'd love to connect"
|
|
36
|
-
- "excited to share"
|
|
37
|
-
- generic thesis praise without a real tie-in
|
|
38
|
-
- vague founder adjectives
|
|
39
|
-
- begging language
|
|
40
|
-
- soft closing questions when a direct ask is clearer
|
|
41
|
-
|
|
42
|
-
## Cold Email Structure
|
|
43
|
-
|
|
44
|
-
1. subject line: short and specific
|
|
45
|
-
2. opener: why this investor specifically
|
|
46
|
-
3. pitch: what the company does, why now, and what proof matters
|
|
47
|
-
4. ask: one concrete next step
|
|
48
|
-
5. sign-off: name, role, and one credibility anchor if needed
|
|
49
|
-
|
|
50
|
-
## Personalization Sources
|
|
51
|
-
|
|
52
|
-
Reference one or more of:
|
|
53
|
-
- relevant portfolio companies
|
|
54
|
-
- a public thesis, talk, post, or article
|
|
55
|
-
- a mutual connection
|
|
56
|
-
- a clear market or product fit with the investor's focus
|
|
57
|
-
|
|
58
|
-
If that context is missing, state that the draft still needs personalization instead of pretending it is finished.
|
|
59
|
-
|
|
60
|
-
## Follow-Up Cadence
|
|
61
|
-
|
|
62
|
-
Default:
|
|
63
|
-
- day 0: initial outbound
|
|
64
|
-
- day 4 or 5: short follow-up with one new data point
|
|
65
|
-
- day 10 to 12: final follow-up with a clean close
|
|
66
|
-
|
|
67
|
-
Do not keep nudging after that unless the user wants a longer sequence.
|
|
68
|
-
|
|
69
|
-
## Warm Intro Requests
|
|
70
|
-
|
|
71
|
-
Make life easy for the connector:
|
|
72
|
-
- explain why the intro is a fit
|
|
73
|
-
- include a forwardable blurb
|
|
74
|
-
- keep the forwardable blurb under 100 words
|
|
75
|
-
|
|
76
|
-
## Post-Meeting Updates
|
|
77
|
-
|
|
78
|
-
Include:
|
|
79
|
-
- the specific thing discussed
|
|
80
|
-
- the answer or update promised
|
|
81
|
-
- one new proof point if available
|
|
82
|
-
- the next step
|
|
83
|
-
|
|
84
|
-
## Quality Gate
|
|
85
|
-
|
|
86
|
-
Before delivering:
|
|
87
|
-
- the message is genuinely personalized
|
|
88
|
-
- the ask is explicit
|
|
89
|
-
- the proof point is concrete
|
|
90
|
-
- filler praise and softener language are gone
|
|
91
|
-
- word count stays tight
|
|
@@ -1,75 +0,0 @@
|
|
|
1
|
-
---
|
|
2
|
-
name: market-research
|
|
3
|
-
description: Conduct market research, competitive analysis, investor due diligence, and industry intelligence with source attribution and decision-oriented summaries. Use when the user wants market sizing, competitor comparisons, fund research, technology scans, or research that informs business decisions.
|
|
4
|
-
origin: ECC
|
|
5
|
-
---
|
|
6
|
-
|
|
7
|
-
# Market Research
|
|
8
|
-
|
|
9
|
-
Produce research that supports decisions, not research theater.
|
|
10
|
-
|
|
11
|
-
## When to Activate
|
|
12
|
-
|
|
13
|
-
- researching a market, category, company, investor, or technology trend
|
|
14
|
-
- building TAM/SAM/SOM estimates
|
|
15
|
-
- comparing competitors or adjacent products
|
|
16
|
-
- preparing investor dossiers before outreach
|
|
17
|
-
- pressure-testing a thesis before building, funding, or entering a market
|
|
18
|
-
|
|
19
|
-
## Research Standards
|
|
20
|
-
|
|
21
|
-
1. Every important claim needs a source.
|
|
22
|
-
2. Prefer recent data and call out stale data.
|
|
23
|
-
3. Include contrarian evidence and downside cases.
|
|
24
|
-
4. Translate findings into a decision, not just a summary.
|
|
25
|
-
5. Separate fact, inference, and recommendation clearly.
|
|
26
|
-
|
|
27
|
-
## Common Research Modes
|
|
28
|
-
|
|
29
|
-
### Investor / Fund Diligence
|
|
30
|
-
Collect:
|
|
31
|
-
- fund size, stage, and typical check size
|
|
32
|
-
- relevant portfolio companies
|
|
33
|
-
- public thesis and recent activity
|
|
34
|
-
- reasons the fund is or is not a fit
|
|
35
|
-
- any obvious red flags or mismatches
|
|
36
|
-
|
|
37
|
-
### Competitive Analysis
|
|
38
|
-
Collect:
|
|
39
|
-
- product reality, not marketing copy
|
|
40
|
-
- funding and investor history if public
|
|
41
|
-
- traction metrics if public
|
|
42
|
-
- distribution and pricing clues
|
|
43
|
-
- strengths, weaknesses, and positioning gaps
|
|
44
|
-
|
|
45
|
-
### Market Sizing
|
|
46
|
-
Use:
|
|
47
|
-
- top-down estimates from reports or public datasets
|
|
48
|
-
- bottom-up sanity checks from realistic customer acquisition assumptions
|
|
49
|
-
- explicit assumptions for every leap in logic
|
|
50
|
-
|
|
51
|
-
### Technology / Vendor Research
|
|
52
|
-
Collect:
|
|
53
|
-
- how it works
|
|
54
|
-
- trade-offs and adoption signals
|
|
55
|
-
- integration complexity
|
|
56
|
-
- lock-in, security, compliance, and operational risk
|
|
57
|
-
|
|
58
|
-
## Output Format
|
|
59
|
-
|
|
60
|
-
Default structure:
|
|
61
|
-
1. executive summary
|
|
62
|
-
2. key findings
|
|
63
|
-
3. implications
|
|
64
|
-
4. risks and caveats
|
|
65
|
-
5. recommendation
|
|
66
|
-
6. sources
|
|
67
|
-
|
|
68
|
-
## Quality Gate
|
|
69
|
-
|
|
70
|
-
Before delivering:
|
|
71
|
-
- all numbers are sourced or labeled as estimates
|
|
72
|
-
- old data is flagged
|
|
73
|
-
- the recommendation follows from the evidence
|
|
74
|
-
- risks and counterarguments are included
|
|
75
|
-
- the output makes a decision easier
|
|
@@ -1,7 +0,0 @@
|
|
|
1
|
-
interface:
|
|
2
|
-
display_name: "Market Research"
|
|
3
|
-
short_description: "Source-attributed market, competitor, and investor research"
|
|
4
|
-
brand_color: "#2563EB"
|
|
5
|
-
default_prompt: "Research this market and summarize the decision-relevant findings"
|
|
6
|
-
policy:
|
|
7
|
-
allow_implicit_invocation: true
|
|
@@ -1,44 +0,0 @@
|
|
|
1
|
-
---
|
|
2
|
-
name: nextjs-turbopack
|
|
3
|
-
description: Next.js 16+ and Turbopack — incremental bundling, FS caching, dev speed, and when to use Turbopack vs webpack.
|
|
4
|
-
origin: ECC
|
|
5
|
-
---
|
|
6
|
-
|
|
7
|
-
# Next.js and Turbopack
|
|
8
|
-
|
|
9
|
-
Next.js 16+ uses Turbopack by default for local development: an incremental bundler written in Rust that significantly speeds up dev startup and hot updates.
|
|
10
|
-
|
|
11
|
-
## When to Use
|
|
12
|
-
|
|
13
|
-
- **Turbopack (default dev)**: Use for day-to-day development. Faster cold start and HMR, especially in large apps.
|
|
14
|
-
- **Webpack (legacy dev)**: Use only if you hit a Turbopack bug or rely on a webpack-only plugin in dev. Disable with `--webpack` (or `--no-turbopack` depending on your Next.js version; check the docs for your release).
|
|
15
|
-
- **Production**: Production build behavior (`next build`) may use Turbopack or webpack depending on Next.js version; check the official Next.js docs for your version.
|
|
16
|
-
|
|
17
|
-
Use when: developing or debugging Next.js 16+ apps, diagnosing slow dev startup or HMR, or optimizing production bundles.
|
|
18
|
-
|
|
19
|
-
## How It Works
|
|
20
|
-
|
|
21
|
-
- **Turbopack**: Incremental bundler for Next.js dev. Uses file-system caching so restarts are much faster (e.g. 5–14x on large projects).
|
|
22
|
-
- **Default in dev**: From Next.js 16, `next dev` runs with Turbopack unless disabled.
|
|
23
|
-
- **File-system caching**: Restarts reuse previous work; cache is typically under `.next`; no extra config needed for basic use.
|
|
24
|
-
- **Bundle Analyzer (Next.js 16.1+)**: Experimental Bundle Analyzer to inspect output and find heavy dependencies; enable via config or experimental flag (see Next.js docs for your version).
|
|
25
|
-
|
|
26
|
-
## Examples
|
|
27
|
-
|
|
28
|
-
### Commands
|
|
29
|
-
|
|
30
|
-
```bash
|
|
31
|
-
next dev
|
|
32
|
-
next build
|
|
33
|
-
next start
|
|
34
|
-
```
|
|
35
|
-
|
|
36
|
-
### Usage
|
|
37
|
-
|
|
38
|
-
Run `next dev` for local development with Turbopack. Use the Bundle Analyzer (see Next.js docs) to optimize code-splitting and trim large dependencies. Prefer App Router and server components where possible.
|
|
39
|
-
|
|
40
|
-
## Best Practices
|
|
41
|
-
|
|
42
|
-
- Stay on a recent Next.js 16.x for stable Turbopack and caching behavior.
|
|
43
|
-
- If dev is slow, ensure you're on Turbopack (default) and that the cache isn't being cleared unnecessarily.
|
|
44
|
-
- For production bundle size issues, use the official Next.js bundle analysis tooling for your version.
|