@utilarium/dreadcabinet 0.0.16-dev.0

package/output/kodrdriv/agentic-reflection-commit-2026-01-30T19-32-17-053Z.md

@@ -0,0 +1,174 @@
+# Agentic Workflow - Self-Reflection Report
+
+Generated: 2026-01-30T19:32:17.053Z
+
+## Execution Summary
+
+- **Iterations**: 4
+- **Tool Calls**: 6
+- **Unique Tools**: 6
+
+## Tool Effectiveness Analysis
+
+| Tool | Calls | Success | Failures | Success Rate | Avg Duration |
+|------|-------|---------|----------|--------------|--------------|
+| get_file_content | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% | 1ms |
+| get_file_modification_times | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% | 0ms |
+| group_files_by_concern | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% | 0ms |
+| get_recent_commits | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% | 8ms |
+| get_file_history | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% | 10ms |
+| search_codebase | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% | 17ms |
+
+### Tool Performance Insights
+
+**Most Frequently Used:**
+- get_file_content: 1 calls
+- get_file_modification_times: 1 calls
+- group_files_by_concern: 1 calls
+
+## Recommendations for Improvement
+
+- **Underutilized Tools**: Many tools were called only once. Consider whether all tools are necessary or if the agent needs better guidance on when to use them.
+
+## Detailed Execution Timeline
+
+| Time | Iteration | Tool | Result | Duration |
+|------|-----------|------|--------|----------|
+| 11:31:46 AM | 1 | get_file_content | ✅ Success | 1ms |
+| 11:31:46 AM | 1 | get_file_modification_times | ✅ Success | 0ms |
+| 11:31:46 AM | 1 | group_files_by_concern | ✅ Success | 0ms |
+| 11:31:46 AM | 1 | get_recent_commits | ✅ Success | 8ms |
+| 11:31:49 AM | 2 | get_file_history | ✅ Success | 10ms |
+| 11:32:02 AM | 3 | search_codebase | ✅ Success | 17ms |
+
+## Conversation History
+
+<details>
+<summary>Click to expand full agentic interaction</summary>
+
+```json
+[
+  {
+    "role": "system",
+    "content": "You are a professional software engineer writing commit messages for your team.\n\n## Available Tools\n\nYou have access to tools to investigate the changes:\n- `get_file_content` - Read file contents or diffs for specific files\n- `get_file_modification_times` - See when files were modified relative to each other\n- `group_files_by_concern` - Understand how files relate by type/purpose\n- `get_recent_commits` - Get recent commit history to avoid duplicates\n- `get_file_history` - Understand how code evolved\n- `get_file_dependencies` - Assess impact of changes\n- `get_related_tests` - Find related test files\n- `search_codebase` - Search for usage patterns\n\nUse these tools to investigate the changes rather than asking for information upfront.\n\n## Your Task\n\nAnalyze the staged changes and determine the best way to commit them. Your primary goal is to create **meaningful, atomic commits** that each represent a single logical change.\n\n**CRITICAL**: When there are many changed files, especially after a long work session (multiple hours), you should almost always split them into multiple commits. A single commit with 10+ files usually indicates multiple distinct changes that should be separated.\n\nThink about:\n- What distinct features, fixes, or improvements are represented?\n- Are there natural groupings by functionality, module, or purpose?\n- When were files modified relative to each other?\n- What should reviewers focus on in each commit?\n\n## Investigation Strategy\n\nFor any non-trivial set of changes, gather multiple signals to understand how to group commits:\n\n1. **Check file modification times** using `get_file_modification_times`\n   - This reveals *when* files were changed relative to each other\n   - Files modified close together *may* be part of the same logical change\n   - Large temporal gaps *can* indicate separate work sessions\n   - Note: temporal proximity is one signal, not a guarantee of relatedness\n\n2. **Understand logical relationships** using `group_files_by_concern`\n   - Groups by module, type (tests, docs, source), and directory structure\n   - Reveals which files are functionally related regardless of when they were modified\n\n3. **Cross-reference both signals** to make informed decisions:\n   - Files modified together AND logically related → strong candidate for same commit\n   - Files modified apart BUT logically related → might still belong together\n   - Files modified together BUT logically unrelated → consider splitting\n   - Use your judgment - neither signal is definitive on its own\n\n4. **Investigate further** as needed:\n   - get_file_content - see full context when diffs are unclear\n   - get_file_history - understand how code evolved\n   - get_file_dependencies - assess impact of changes\n   - get_recent_commits - avoid duplicate messages\n   - get_related_tests - understand behavior changes\n   - search_codebase - find usage patterns\n\n## When to Split Commits\n\n**Prefer multiple commits when:**\n- Changes span multiple hours of work (check modification times!)\n- Different logical features or fixes are included\n- Test changes could be separated from production code changes\n- Documentation updates are unrelated to code changes\n- Refactoring is mixed with feature work\n- Configuration changes are mixed with implementation changes\n- Files in different modules/packages are changed for different reasons\n\n**Keep as one commit when:**\n- All changes are part of a single, cohesive feature\n- Files were modified together in a focused work session\n- Test changes directly test the production code changes\n- The changes tell a single coherent story\n\n**Default bias**: When in doubt about whether to split, **prefer splitting**. It's better to have too many focused commits than too few bloated ones. A good commit should be understandable and reviewable in isolation.\n\n## Important Context Guidelines\n\nIf additional context is provided (from context files or other sources), use your judgment:\n- If the context is relevant to these specific changes, incorporate it\n- If the context describes unrelated changes or other packages, ignore it\n- Don't force connections between unrelated information\n- Focus on accurately describing what actually changed\n\n## Writing Style\n\nWrite naturally and directly:\n- Use plain language, not corporate speak\n- Be specific and concrete\n- Avoid buzzwords and jargon\n- No emojis or excessive punctuation\n- No phrases like \"this commit\" or \"this PR\"\n- No meta-commentary about the commit itself\n\nFollow conventional commit format when appropriate (feat:, fix:, refactor:, docs:, test:, chore:), but prioritize clarity over formality.\n\n## Output Format\n\nWhen ready, format your response as:\n\nCOMMIT_MESSAGE:\n[Your commit message here - only for the FIRST group of changes if splitting]\n\nIf changes should be split into multiple commits (which is often the case with large changesets):\n\nSUGGESTED_SPLITS:\nSplit 1:\nFiles: [list of files]\nRationale: [why these belong together - mention temporal clustering and/or logical relationship]\nMessage: [commit message for this split]\n\nSplit 2:\nFiles: [list of files]\nRationale: [why these belong together]\nMessage: [commit message for this split]\n\nSplit 3:\n...\n\nOutput only the commit message and splits. No conversational remarks or follow-up offers."
+  },
+  {
+    "role": "user",
+    "content": "I have staged changes that need a commit message.\n\nChanged files (1):\n  - package.json\n\nUser direction: --model\n\n## Your Analysis Task\n\nUse your tools to investigate the changes:\n1. Use `get_file_content` to read the actual changes in the files\n2. Use `get_file_modification_times` to see when files were modified relative to each other\n3. Use `group_files_by_concern` to understand how files relate by type/purpose\n4. Use `get_recent_commits` to check recent commit history and avoid duplicates\n5. Cross-reference temporal proximity and logical relatedness to determine the best commit structure\n\nConsider:\n- What distinct features, fixes, or improvements are included?\n- Are files that were modified together also logically related?\n- Would separate commits make the history more understandable?\n\nIf changes represent multiple logical concerns, suggest splits.\n\nStart by reading the file contents to understand what actually changed."
+  },
+  {
+    "role": "assistant",
+    "content": null,
+    "tool_calls": [
+      {
+        "id": "call_N7YetLMqSGEhBnYcSPi25TyO",
+        "type": "function",
+        "function": {
+          "name": "get_file_content",
+          "arguments": "{\"filePath\": \"package.json\", \"includeLineNumbers\": false}"
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "id": "call_GfCe7IC2g0JZj5UOd8EzjI1C",
+        "type": "function",
+        "function": {
+          "name": "get_file_modification_times",
+          "arguments": "{\"filePaths\": [\"package.json\"]}"
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "id": "call_eZeXG5u2dVWryQvUGlpoU2Q7",
+        "type": "function",
+        "function": {
+          "name": "group_files_by_concern",
+          "arguments": "{\"filePaths\": [\"package.json\"]}"
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "id": "call_Ulo8CEA2Sc6ZmYKdPmwGKZNM",
+        "type": "function",
+        "function": {
+          "name": "get_recent_commits",
+          "arguments": "{\"filePaths\": [\"package.json\"], \"since\": \"1 week ago\", \"limit\": 5}"
+        }
+      }
+    ]
+  },
+  {
+    "role": "tool",
+    "tool_call_id": "call_N7YetLMqSGEhBnYcSPi25TyO",
+    "content": "{\n  \"name\": \"@theunwalked/dreadcabinet\",\n  \"version\": \"0.0.15-dev.0\",\n  \"description\": \"dreadcabinet organizes the chaos.\",\n  \"main\": \"dist/dreadcabinet.cjs\",\n  \"module\": \"dist/dreadcabinet.js\",\n  \"type\": \"module\",\n  \"repository\": {\n    \"type\": \"git\",\n    \"url\": \"git+https://github.com/utilarium/dreadcabinet.git\"\n  },\n  \"homepage\": \"https://utilarium.github.io/dreadcabinet/\",\n  \"exports\": {\n    \".\": {\n      \"types\": \"./dist/dreadcabinet.d.ts\",\n      \"import\": \"./dist/dreadcabinet.js\",\n      \"require\": \"./dist/dreadcabinet.cjs\"\n    }\n  },\n  \"scripts\": {\n    \"build\": \"npm run lint && tsc --noEmit && vite build\",\n    \"start\": \"dist/main.js\",\n    \"dev\": \"vite build --watch\",\n    \"watch\": \"npm run dev\",\n    \"test\": \"npm run test:coverage && npm run test:readme\",\n    \"test:coverage\": \"vitest run --coverage\",\n    \"test:readme\": \"doccident -c .markdown-doctest-setup.mjs README.md\",\n    \"lint\": \"eslint . --ext .ts\",\n    \"lint:fix\": \"eslint . --ext .ts --fix\",\n    \"precommit\": \"npm run build && npm run test\",\n    \"clean\": \"rm -rf dist\",\n    \"prepublishOnly\": \"npm run clean && npm run build\"\n  },\n  \"keywords\": [\n    \"focus\",\n    \"productivity\",\n    \"notes\",\n    \"genai\"\n  ],\n  \"author\": \"Tim O'Brien <tobrien@discursive.com>\",\n  \"license\": \"Apache-2.0\",\n  \"engines\": {\n    \"node\": \">=24.0.0\"\n  },\n  \"dependencies\": {\n    \"commander\": \"^14.0.0\",\n    \"dayjs\": \"^1.11.13\",\n    \"glob\": \"^11.0.3\",\n    \"zod\": \"^4.3.6\"\n  },\n  \"devDependencies\": {\n    \"@doccident/doccident\": \"^0.0.7\",\n    \"@eslint/eslintrc\": \"^3.3.1\",\n    \"@eslint/js\": \"^9.30.1\",\n    \"@rollup/plugin-replace\": \"^6.0.2\",\n    \"@swc/core\": \"^1.12.11\",\n    \"@theunwalked/cardigantime\": \"^0.0.22\",\n    \"@types/node\": \"^24.0.12\",\n    \"@typescript-eslint/eslint-plugin\": \"^8.36.0\",\n    \"@typescript-eslint/parser\": \"^8.36.0\",\n    \"@vitest/coverage-v8\": \"^3.2.4\",\n    \"eslint\": \"^9.30.1\",\n    \"eslint-plugin-import\": \"^2.32.0\",\n    \"globals\": \"^16.3.0\",\n    \"mockdate\": \"^3.0.5\",\n    \"typescript\": \"^5.8.3\",\n    \"vite\": \"^7.0.4\",\n    \"vite-plugin-dts\": \"^4.5.4\",\n    \"vite-plugin-node\": \"^7.0.0\",\n    \"vitest\": \"^3.2.4\"\n  },\n  \"overrides\": {\n    \"wrap-ansi\": \"7.0.0\"\n  }\n}\n",
+    "name": "get_file_content"
+  },
+  {
+    "role": "tool",
+    "tool_call_id": "call_GfCe7IC2g0JZj5UOd8EzjI1C",
+    "content": "## File Modification Times (sorted oldest to newest)\n\n2026-01-30 17:41:58  package.json\n\n\n## Temporal Clusters (files modified within 10 minutes of each other)\n\nAll 1 files were modified in a single work session.\n",
+    "name": "get_file_modification_times"
+  },
+  {
+    "role": "tool",
+    "tool_call_id": "call_eZeXG5u2dVWryQvUGlpoU2Q7",
+    "content": "dependencies (1 files):\n  - package.json\n\nSuggestion: All files appear to be related and should be in a single commit.",
+    "name": "group_files_by_concern"
+  },
+  {
+    "role": "tool",
+    "tool_call_id": "call_Ulo8CEA2Sc6ZmYKdPmwGKZNM",
+    "content": "No commits found in the specified time period (1 week ago)",
+    "name": "get_recent_commits"
+  },
+  {
+    "role": "assistant",
+    "content": null,
+    "tool_calls": [
+      {
+        "id": "call_FUcdQItAMfKO2Qc2ECulDCvW",
+        "type": "function",
+        "function": {
+          "name": "get_file_history",
+          "arguments": "{\"filePaths\":[\"package.json\"],\"limit\":5,\"format\":\"detailed\"}"
+        }
+      }
+    ]
+  },
+  {
+    "role": "tool",
+    "tool_call_id": "call_FUcdQItAMfKO2Qc2ECulDCvW",
+    "content": "4ddf803595476cc67fed9c0b78b2ea6a4582ac1b\nTim O'Brien (tobrien@discursive.com)\nTue Jan 13 00:58:23 2026 -0800\nchore: bump to 0.0.15-dev.0\n\n\n---\n93e78797b3b6810cad640f924136764ccc2358dc\nTim O'Brien (tobrien@discursive.com)\nTue Jan 13 00:57:11 2026 -0800\nchore(release): 0.0.15 (#88)\n\n* chore: bump to v0.0.15-dev.0\n\n* chore(node): use node: built-ins and align TS/Vite for ESNext\n\n* test(readme): switch markdown doctest transform from Babel to SWC\n\n* chore(deps): bump @theunwalked/cardigantime to ^0.0.22\n\n* chore(release): 0.0.15\n---\n832a08bf45e405b52278ef706cc27ffed3ceab71\nTim O'Brien (tobrien@discursive.com)\nMon Jan 12 23:19:42 2026 -0800\nchore(release): 0.0.14 (#87)\n\n* 0.0.14-dev.0\n\n* chore(node): require Node 24; update CI and ignores for lockfile-free installs\n\n- Add `.nvmrc` and set `engines.node` to `>=24.0.0`\n- Bump GitHub Actions workflows to Node 24 and switch `npm ci` -> `npm install`\n- Ignore `package-lock.json` (root and docs) and update lockfile as needed\n\n* chore(deps): bump @theunwalked/cardigantime to ^0.0.21\n\n* chore(release): 0.0.14\n---\na33bcd2eb9d86de97a1d7c6ae6cefc3b866ad251\nTim O'Brien (tobrien@discursive.com)\nSat Jan 10 18:53:50 2026 -0800\nchore(release): 0.0.13 (#86)\n\n* 0.0.13-dev.0\n\n* chore: drop Codecov upload from CI and remove self-referential dependency\n\n- Remove the Codecov action step from the test workflow (no more CODECOV_TOKEN/coverage uploads)\n- Remove `@theunwalked/dreadcabinet` from runtime deps to avoid depending on the package itself\n\n* chore(deps): remove @theunwalked/dreadcabinet from package-lock.json\n\n* chore(deps): bump @theunwalked/cardigantime to ^0.0.20\n\n* chore(npm): set save=false in .npmrc\n\n* chore(deps): update package-lock for @theunwalked/cardigantime@0.0.20\n\n* chore(release): 0.0.13\n---\nbdf8b70fc171d499202c573755d6717b8eb98957\nTim O'Brien (tobrien@discursive.com)\nThu Jan 8 06:01:42 2026 -0800\nchore(release): 0.0.12\n\n- Promote version from 0.0.12-dev.0 to 0.0.12 for the stable release/publish (#82)\n\n* 0.0.12-dev.0\n\n* docs(readme): update License line\n\n- Append “TEST” to the README License attribution line\n- Add a trailing newline at end of file\n\n* chore(release): 0.0.12\n\n- Promote version from 0.0.12-dev.0 to 0.0.12 for the stable release/publish\n\n* ci(dependency-review): run workflow only on pull requests\n\nRemove the push trigger for the `working` branch so dependency review runs only for PRs targeting `main`/`working`, avoiding redundant checks on direct pushes while keeping review enforcement on incoming changes.\n---\n",
+    "name": "get_file_history"
+  },
+  {
+    "role": "assistant",
+    "content": null,
+    "tool_calls": [
+      {
+        "id": "call_8z2US535kCdpOrD8gznkK3dF",
+        "type": "function",
+        "function": {
+          "name": "search_codebase",
+          "arguments": "{\"query\":\"wrap-ansi\", \"contextLines\":2}"
+        }
+      }
+    ]
+  },
+  {
+    "role": "tool",
+    "tool_call_id": "call_8z2US535kCdpOrD8gznkK3dF",
+    "content": "package.json-71-  },\npackage.json-72-  \"overrides\": {\npackage.json:73:    \"wrap-ansi\": \"7.0.0\"\npackage.json-74-  }\npackage.json-75-}\n",
+    "name": "search_codebase"
+  },
+  {
+    "role": "assistant",
+    "content": "COMMIT_MESSAGE:\nchore(deps): pin wrap-ansi to 7.0.0 via package.json overrides"
+  }
+]
+```
+
+</details>
+
+## Generated Commit Message
+
+```
+chore(deps): pin wrap-ansi to 7.0.0 via package.json overrides
+```

package/output/kodrdriv/agentic-reflection-commit-2026-01-30T19-35-00-887Z.md

@@ -0,0 +1,152 @@
+# Agentic Workflow - Self-Reflection Report
+
+Generated: 2026-01-30T19:35:00.887Z
+
+## Execution Summary
+
+- **Iterations**: 3
+- **Tool Calls**: 5
+- **Unique Tools**: 5
+
+## Tool Effectiveness Analysis
+
+| Tool | Calls | Success | Failures | Success Rate | Avg Duration |
+|------|-------|---------|----------|--------------|--------------|
+| get_file_content | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% | 1ms |
+| get_file_modification_times | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% | 1ms |
+| group_files_by_concern | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% | 0ms |
+| get_recent_commits | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% | 10ms |
+| get_file_history | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% | 13ms |
+
+### Tool Performance Insights
+
+**Most Frequently Used:**
+- get_file_content: 1 calls
+- get_file_modification_times: 1 calls
+- group_files_by_concern: 1 calls
+
+## Recommendations for Improvement
+
+- **Underutilized Tools**: Many tools were called only once. Consider whether all tools are necessary or if the agent needs better guidance on when to use them.
+
+## Detailed Execution Timeline
+
+| Time | Iteration | Tool | Result | Duration |
+|------|-----------|------|--------|----------|
+| 11:34:51 AM | 1 | get_file_content | ✅ Success | 1ms |
+| 11:34:51 AM | 1 | get_file_modification_times | ✅ Success | 1ms |
+| 11:34:51 AM | 1 | group_files_by_concern | ✅ Success | 0ms |
+| 11:34:51 AM | 1 | get_recent_commits | ✅ Success | 10ms |
+| 11:34:55 AM | 2 | get_file_history | ✅ Success | 13ms |
+
+## Conversation History
+
+<details>
+<summary>Click to expand full agentic interaction</summary>
+
+```json
+[
+  {
+    "role": "system",
+    "content": "You are a professional software engineer writing commit messages for your team.\n\n## Available Tools\n\nYou have access to tools to investigate the changes:\n- `get_file_content` - Read file contents or diffs for specific files\n- `get_file_modification_times` - See when files were modified relative to each other\n- `group_files_by_concern` - Understand how files relate by type/purpose\n- `get_recent_commits` - Get recent commit history to avoid duplicates\n- `get_file_history` - Understand how code evolved\n- `get_file_dependencies` - Assess impact of changes\n- `get_related_tests` - Find related test files\n- `search_codebase` - Search for usage patterns\n\nUse these tools to investigate the changes rather than asking for information upfront.\n\n## Your Task\n\nAnalyze the staged changes and determine the best way to commit them. Your primary goal is to create **meaningful, atomic commits** that each represent a single logical change.\n\n**CRITICAL**: When there are many changed files, especially after a long work session (multiple hours), you should almost always split them into multiple commits. A single commit with 10+ files usually indicates multiple distinct changes that should be separated.\n\nThink about:\n- What distinct features, fixes, or improvements are represented?\n- Are there natural groupings by functionality, module, or purpose?\n- When were files modified relative to each other?\n- What should reviewers focus on in each commit?\n\n## Investigation Strategy\n\nFor any non-trivial set of changes, gather multiple signals to understand how to group commits:\n\n1. **Check file modification times** using `get_file_modification_times`\n   - This reveals *when* files were changed relative to each other\n   - Files modified close together *may* be part of the same logical change\n   - Large temporal gaps *can* indicate separate work sessions\n   - Note: temporal proximity is one signal, not a guarantee of relatedness\n\n2. **Understand logical relationships** using `group_files_by_concern`\n   - Groups by module, type (tests, docs, source), and directory structure\n   - Reveals which files are functionally related regardless of when they were modified\n\n3. **Cross-reference both signals** to make informed decisions:\n   - Files modified together AND logically related → strong candidate for same commit\n   - Files modified apart BUT logically related → might still belong together\n   - Files modified together BUT logically unrelated → consider splitting\n   - Use your judgment - neither signal is definitive on its own\n\n4. **Investigate further** as needed:\n   - get_file_content - see full context when diffs are unclear\n   - get_file_history - understand how code evolved\n   - get_file_dependencies - assess impact of changes\n   - get_recent_commits - avoid duplicate messages\n   - get_related_tests - understand behavior changes\n   - search_codebase - find usage patterns\n\n## When to Split Commits\n\n**Prefer multiple commits when:**\n- Changes span multiple hours of work (check modification times!)\n- Different logical features or fixes are included\n- Test changes could be separated from production code changes\n- Documentation updates are unrelated to code changes\n- Refactoring is mixed with feature work\n- Configuration changes are mixed with implementation changes\n- Files in different modules/packages are changed for different reasons\n\n**Keep as one commit when:**\n- All changes are part of a single, cohesive feature\n- Files were modified together in a focused work session\n- Test changes directly test the production code changes\n- The changes tell a single coherent story\n\n**Default bias**: When in doubt about whether to split, **prefer splitting**. It's better to have too many focused commits than too few bloated ones. A good commit should be understandable and reviewable in isolation.\n\n## Important Context Guidelines\n\nIf additional context is provided (from context files or other sources), use your judgment:\n- If the context is relevant to these specific changes, incorporate it\n- If the context describes unrelated changes or other packages, ignore it\n- Don't force connections between unrelated information\n- Focus on accurately describing what actually changed\n\n## Writing Style\n\nWrite naturally and directly:\n- Use plain language, not corporate speak\n- Be specific and concrete\n- Avoid buzzwords and jargon\n- No emojis or excessive punctuation\n- No phrases like \"this commit\" or \"this PR\"\n- No meta-commentary about the commit itself\n\nFollow conventional commit format when appropriate (feat:, fix:, refactor:, docs:, test:, chore:), but prioritize clarity over formality.\n\n## Output Format\n\nWhen ready, format your response as:\n\nCOMMIT_MESSAGE:\n[Your commit message here - only for the FIRST group of changes if splitting]\n\nIf changes should be split into multiple commits (which is often the case with large changesets):\n\nSUGGESTED_SPLITS:\nSplit 1:\nFiles: [list of files]\nRationale: [why these belong together - mention temporal clustering and/or logical relationship]\nMessage: [commit message for this split]\n\nSplit 2:\nFiles: [list of files]\nRationale: [why these belong together]\nMessage: [commit message for this split]\n\nSplit 3:\n...\n\nOutput only the commit message and splits. No conversational remarks or follow-up offers."
+  },
+  {
+    "role": "user",
+    "content": "I have staged changes that need a commit message.\n\nChanged files (1):\n  - package.json\n\nUser direction: --model\n\n## Your Analysis Task\n\nUse your tools to investigate the changes:\n1. Use `get_file_content` to read the actual changes in the files\n2. Use `get_file_modification_times` to see when files were modified relative to each other\n3. Use `group_files_by_concern` to understand how files relate by type/purpose\n4. Use `get_recent_commits` to check recent commit history and avoid duplicates\n5. Cross-reference temporal proximity and logical relatedness to determine the best commit structure\n\nConsider:\n- What distinct features, fixes, or improvements are included?\n- Are files that were modified together also logically related?\n- Would separate commits make the history more understandable?\n\nIf changes represent multiple logical concerns, suggest splits.\n\nStart by reading the file contents to understand what actually changed."
+  },
+  {
+    "role": "assistant",
+    "content": null,
+    "tool_calls": [
+      {
+        "id": "call_45ryXGjbqzs27R2AWDpL7x0F",
+        "type": "function",
+        "function": {
+          "name": "get_file_content",
+          "arguments": "{\"filePath\": \"package.json\"}"
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "id": "call_H8p7rAaAwyke1OSavTLZUzSr",
+        "type": "function",
+        "function": {
+          "name": "get_file_modification_times",
+          "arguments": "{\"filePaths\": [\"package.json\"]}"
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "id": "call_KP636h6FPUcClF7fSCvkFiPC",
+        "type": "function",
+        "function": {
+          "name": "group_files_by_concern",
+          "arguments": "{\"filePaths\": [\"package.json\"]}"
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "id": "call_cncEMpwL5LYnxCLYGXmloYk4",
+        "type": "function",
+        "function": {
+          "name": "get_recent_commits",
+          "arguments": "{\"filePaths\": [\"package.json\"], \"since\": \"1 week ago\", \"limit\": 5}"
+        }
+      }
+    ]
+  },
+  {
+    "role": "tool",
+    "tool_call_id": "call_45ryXGjbqzs27R2AWDpL7x0F",
+    "content": "{\n  \"name\": \"@theunwalked/dreadcabinet\",\n  \"version\": \"0.0.16-dev.0\",\n  \"description\": \"dreadcabinet organizes the chaos.\",\n  \"main\": \"dist/dreadcabinet.cjs\",\n  \"module\": \"dist/dreadcabinet.js\",\n  \"type\": \"module\",\n  \"repository\": {\n    \"type\": \"git\",\n    \"url\": \"git+https://github.com/utilarium/dreadcabinet.git\"\n  },\n  \"homepage\": \"https://utilarium.github.io/dreadcabinet/\",\n  \"exports\": {\n    \".\": {\n      \"types\": \"./dist/dreadcabinet.d.ts\",\n      \"import\": \"./dist/dreadcabinet.js\",\n      \"require\": \"./dist/dreadcabinet.cjs\"\n    }\n  },\n  \"scripts\": {\n    \"build\": \"npm run lint && tsc --noEmit && vite build\",\n    \"start\": \"dist/main.js\",\n    \"dev\": \"vite build --watch\",\n    \"watch\": \"npm run dev\",\n    \"test\": \"npm run test:coverage && npm run test:readme\",\n    \"test:coverage\": \"vitest run --coverage\",\n    \"test:readme\": \"doccident -c .markdown-doctest-setup.mjs README.md\",\n    \"lint\": \"eslint . --ext .ts\",\n    \"lint:fix\": \"eslint . --ext .ts --fix\",\n    \"precommit\": \"npm run build && npm run test\",\n    \"clean\": \"rm -rf dist\",\n    \"prepublishOnly\": \"npm run clean && npm run build\"\n  },\n  \"keywords\": [\n    \"focus\",\n    \"productivity\",\n    \"notes\",\n    \"genai\"\n  ],\n  \"author\": \"Tim O'Brien <tobrien@discursive.com>\",\n  \"license\": \"Apache-2.0\",\n  \"engines\": {\n    \"node\": \">=24.0.0\"\n  },\n  \"dependencies\": {\n    \"commander\": \"^14.0.0\",\n    \"dayjs\": \"^1.11.13\",\n    \"glob\": \"^11.0.3\",\n    \"zod\": \"^4.3.6\"\n  },\n  \"devDependencies\": {\n    \"@doccident/doccident\": \"^0.0.7\",\n    \"@eslint/eslintrc\": \"^3.3.1\",\n    \"@eslint/js\": \"^9.30.1\",\n    \"@rollup/plugin-replace\": \"^6.0.2\",\n    \"@swc/core\": \"^1.12.11\",\n    \"@theunwalked/cardigantime\": \"^0.0.22\",\n    \"@types/node\": \"^24.0.12\",\n    \"@typescript-eslint/eslint-plugin\": \"^8.36.0\",\n    \"@typescript-eslint/parser\": \"^8.36.0\",\n    \"@vitest/coverage-v8\": \"^3.2.4\",\n    \"eslint\": \"^9.30.1\",\n    \"eslint-plugin-import\": \"^2.32.0\",\n    \"globals\": \"^16.3.0\",\n    \"mockdate\": \"^3.0.5\",\n    \"typescript\": \"^5.8.3\",\n    \"vite\": \"^7.0.4\",\n    \"vite-plugin-dts\": \"^4.5.4\",\n    \"vite-plugin-node\": \"^7.0.0\",\n    \"vitest\": \"^3.2.4\"\n  },\n  \"overrides\": {\n    \"wrap-ansi\": \"7.0.0\"\n  }\n}\n",
+    "name": "get_file_content"
+  },
+  {
+    "role": "tool",
+    "tool_call_id": "call_H8p7rAaAwyke1OSavTLZUzSr",
+    "content": "## File Modification Times (sorted oldest to newest)\n\n2026-01-30 19:34:41  package.json\n\n\n## Temporal Clusters (files modified within 10 minutes of each other)\n\nAll 1 files were modified in a single work session.\n",
+    "name": "get_file_modification_times"
+  },
+  {
+    "role": "tool",
+    "tool_call_id": "call_KP636h6FPUcClF7fSCvkFiPC",
+    "content": "dependencies (1 files):\n  - package.json\n\nSuggestion: All files appear to be related and should be in a single commit.",
+    "name": "group_files_by_concern"
+  },
+  {
+    "role": "tool",
+    "tool_call_id": "call_cncEMpwL5LYnxCLYGXmloYk4",
+    "content": "64375b1 - chore(deps): pin wrap-ansi to 7.0.0 via package.json overrides (Tim O'Brien, 3 minutes ago)\n",
+    "name": "get_recent_commits"
+  },
+  {
+    "role": "assistant",
+    "content": null,
+    "tool_calls": [
+      {
+        "id": "call_YqyJyKvg0tFtALm1dZoxkJGn",
+        "type": "function",
+        "function": {
+          "name": "get_file_history",
+          "arguments": "{\"filePaths\":[\"package.json\"],\"limit\":5,\"format\":\"detailed\"}"
+        }
+      }
+    ]
+  },
+  {
+    "role": "tool",
+    "tool_call_id": "call_YqyJyKvg0tFtALm1dZoxkJGn",
+    "content": "64375b16362d309e298595a0e425bf995962d7ca\nTim O'Brien (tobrien@discursive.com)\nFri Jan 30 11:32:17 2026 -0800\nchore(deps): pin wrap-ansi to 7.0.0 via package.json overrides\n\n\n---\n4ddf803595476cc67fed9c0b78b2ea6a4582ac1b\nTim O'Brien (tobrien@discursive.com)\nTue Jan 13 00:58:23 2026 -0800\nchore: bump to 0.0.15-dev.0\n\n\n---\n93e78797b3b6810cad640f924136764ccc2358dc\nTim O'Brien (tobrien@discursive.com)\nTue Jan 13 00:57:11 2026 -0800\nchore(release): 0.0.15 (#88)\n\n* chore: bump to v0.0.15-dev.0\n\n* chore(node): use node: built-ins and align TS/Vite for ESNext\n\n* test(readme): switch markdown doctest transform from Babel to SWC\n\n* chore(deps): bump @theunwalked/cardigantime to ^0.0.22\n\n* chore(release): 0.0.15\n---\n832a08bf45e405b52278ef706cc27ffed3ceab71\nTim O'Brien (tobrien@discursive.com)\nMon Jan 12 23:19:42 2026 -0800\nchore(release): 0.0.14 (#87)\n\n* 0.0.14-dev.0\n\n* chore(node): require Node 24; update CI and ignores for lockfile-free installs\n\n- Add `.nvmrc` and set `engines.node` to `>=24.0.0`\n- Bump GitHub Actions workflows to Node 24 and switch `npm ci` -> `npm install`\n- Ignore `package-lock.json` (root and docs) and update lockfile as needed\n\n* chore(deps): bump @theunwalked/cardigantime to ^0.0.21\n\n* chore(release): 0.0.14\n---\na33bcd2eb9d86de97a1d7c6ae6cefc3b866ad251\nTim O'Brien (tobrien@discursive.com)\nSat Jan 10 18:53:50 2026 -0800\nchore(release): 0.0.13 (#86)\n\n* 0.0.13-dev.0\n\n* chore: drop Codecov upload from CI and remove self-referential dependency\n\n- Remove the Codecov action step from the test workflow (no more CODECOV_TOKEN/coverage uploads)\n- Remove `@theunwalked/dreadcabinet` from runtime deps to avoid depending on the package itself\n\n* chore(deps): remove @theunwalked/dreadcabinet from package-lock.json\n\n* chore(deps): bump @theunwalked/cardigantime to ^0.0.20\n\n* chore(npm): set save=false in .npmrc\n\n* chore(deps): update package-lock for @theunwalked/cardigantime@0.0.20\n\n* chore(release): 0.0.13\n---\n",
+    "name": "get_file_history"
+  },
+  {
+    "role": "assistant",
+    "content": "COMMIT_MESSAGE:\nchore: bump version to 0.0.16-dev.0"
+  }
+]
+```
+
+</details>
+
+## Generated Commit Message
+
+```
+chore: bump version to 0.0.16-dev.0
+```