@uoyo/mvtt 2.0.0-beta.3 → 2.0.0-beta.4
This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
- package/dist/fs/materialize.d.ts.map +1 -1
- package/dist/fs/materialize.js +7 -4
- package/dist/fs/materialize.js.map +1 -1
- package/dist/fs/registry-merge.d.ts +19 -0
- package/dist/fs/registry-merge.d.ts.map +1 -0
- package/dist/fs/registry-merge.js +177 -0
- package/dist/fs/registry-merge.js.map +1 -0
- package/dist/scripts/plan-update.cjs +7563 -0
- package/install-manifest.yaml +6 -2
- package/package.json +1 -1
- package/sources/scripts/plan-update.js +353 -0
- package/sources/sections/output-format-constraint.md +14 -0
- package/sources/sections/project-context-profile.md +29 -0
- package/sources/skills/mvt-analyze/manifest.yaml +3 -0
- package/sources/skills/mvt-analyze-code/manifest.yaml +6 -0
- package/sources/skills/mvt-cleanup/manifest.yaml +3 -0
- package/sources/skills/mvt-create-skill/manifest.yaml +3 -0
- package/sources/skills/mvt-design/manifest.yaml +3 -0
- package/sources/skills/mvt-fix/manifest.yaml +3 -0
- package/sources/skills/mvt-implement/business.md +9 -5
- package/sources/skills/mvt-implement/manifest.yaml +3 -0
- package/sources/skills/mvt-init/manifest.yaml +3 -0
- package/sources/skills/mvt-manage-context/manifest.yaml +6 -0
- package/sources/skills/mvt-plan-dev/manifest.yaml +3 -0
- package/sources/skills/mvt-quick-dev/manifest.yaml +3 -0
- package/sources/skills/mvt-refactor/manifest.yaml +3 -0
- package/sources/skills/mvt-review/manifest.yaml +3 -0
- package/sources/skills/mvt-sync-context/business.md +58 -29
- package/sources/skills/mvt-sync-context/manifest.yaml +6 -0
- package/sources/skills/mvt-test/manifest.yaml +3 -0
- package/sources/skills/mvt-update-plan/business.md +30 -28
- package/sources/skills/mvt-update-plan/manifest.yaml +3 -0
|
@@ -4,8 +4,8 @@
|
|
|
4
4
|
- **What**: produce a candidate list of change-ids whose artifacts will be aggregated.
|
|
5
5
|
- **How**:
|
|
6
6
|
1. Read `session.yaml`. Collect `changes[]` entries with `status: done`.
|
|
7
|
-
2. For each candidate, verify `.ai-agents/workspace/artifacts/{change-id}/` exists AND contains at least one of `analysis.md` or `
|
|
8
|
-
3. (Fallback) If `changes[]` is empty, scan `.ai-agents/workspace/artifacts/*/` directly; offer those with `analysis.md` or `
|
|
7
|
+
2. For each candidate, verify `.ai-agents/workspace/artifacts/{change-id}/` exists AND contains at least one of `analysis.md` or `implementation.md`. Drop entries with only `plan.yaml`, or with only `design.md` (design artifacts are not aggregated -- see Step 3).
|
|
8
|
+
3. (Fallback) If `changes[]` is empty, scan `.ai-agents/workspace/artifacts/*/` directly; offer those with `analysis.md` or `implementation.md`, marked `unindexed`.
|
|
9
9
|
4. Exclude already-archived or irrelevant changes:
|
|
10
10
|
- **Indexed changes**: exclude any `changes[]` entry with `status: abandoned`. For `status: done` entries, Step 1.2's directory existence check already filters out those whose artifacts have been moved to `artifacts/_archived/` by `/mvt-cleanup`.
|
|
11
11
|
- **Fallback scan**: when scanning `artifacts/*/` directly, skip any path under `artifacts/_archived/` (the unified archive directory managed by `/mvt-cleanup`).
|
|
@@ -32,57 +32,85 @@ This step establishes the **target structure** that aggregated content must fit
|
|
|
32
32
|
2. Parse the current `.md` into a section map:
|
|
33
33
|
- Each top-level `##` heading -> one section anchor.
|
|
34
34
|
- Record: section title (verbatim), byte range, and a 1-line semantic summary derived from the section's content (e.g., "lists domain terms with definitions" or "describes module dependencies").
|
|
35
|
-
- The summary is what enables matching in Step
|
|
35
|
+
- The summary is what enables matching in Step 5 -- section titles may be in any language and may not match conventional names (Terms / Modules / etc.).
|
|
36
36
|
3. If the document has zero `##` sections (single block) -> STOP. Recommend `/mvt-analyze-code` to establish a sectioned baseline first.
|
|
37
|
-
4. Read `.ai-agents/workspace/project-context.yaml`. Record current `projects[].source_paths`, `modules`, and `tech_stack` for diff comparison in Step
|
|
37
|
+
4. Read `.ai-agents/workspace/project-context.yaml`. Record current `projects[].source_paths`, `modules`, and `tech_stack` for diff comparison in Step 5d.
|
|
38
38
|
|
|
39
|
-
### Step 3: Extract
|
|
39
|
+
### Step 3: Extract Artifact Content
|
|
40
40
|
|
|
41
|
-
- **What**: from each selected change-id, extract atomic knowledge items
|
|
41
|
+
- **What**: from each selected change-id, extract atomic knowledge items (do not classify yet).
|
|
42
42
|
- **How**:
|
|
43
|
-
1. For each selected change-id, read available artifacts (`analysis.md`, `implementation.md`).
|
|
43
|
+
1. For each selected change-id, read available artifacts (`analysis.md`, `implementation.md`). Do NOT read `design.md` -- design artifacts are not aggregated by this skill.
|
|
44
44
|
2. Extract atomic items. Typical sources:
|
|
45
45
|
- `analysis.md` -> domain terms, actors, business rules, constraints
|
|
46
46
|
- `implementation.md` -> files added/changed (informs `.yaml` source_paths), realized vs deviated design points
|
|
47
|
-
|
|
47
|
+
|
|
48
|
+
### Step 4: Normalize Extracted Content
|
|
49
|
+
|
|
50
|
+
Before classifying extracted items against the section map, normalize each item per the **Document Profile: project-context.md** section loaded above. This step strips intra-artifact cross-references -- meaningful in their source document but noise in project-context.md -- before they enter the merge pipeline.
|
|
51
|
+
|
|
52
|
+
1. For each extracted item, apply the normalization rules below (the governing principle lives in the Document Profile; this table lists concrete patterns, non-exhaustive):
|
|
53
|
+
|
|
54
|
+
| Pattern | Example | Normalization |
|
|
55
|
+
|---------|---------|---------------|
|
|
56
|
+
| ADR reference with section number | `(ADR-06, §12.4)` | Remove the reference; keep the substantive content it annotates |
|
|
57
|
+
| Bare ADR reference | `per ADR-06`, `(ADR-06)` | Remove entirely |
|
|
58
|
+
| Section number reference | `§12.4`, `§3.2.1` | Remove entirely |
|
|
59
|
+
| Design rule label prefix | `B-1:`, `D-7:`, `C-3:` | Remove the prefix; keep the rule text |
|
|
60
|
+
| Parenthesized design label | `(D-7)`, `(B-4)` | Remove entirely |
|
|
61
|
+
| Cross-artifact link phrase | `see §X`, `refer to ADR-N` | Remove the link phrase |
|
|
62
|
+
| Other reference pointing outside project-context.md | Any pattern not listed above | Apply the governing principle: if understanding requires an external document, strip the reference marker |
|
|
63
|
+
|
|
64
|
+
**Critical**: strip only the *reference marker*, never the *substantive content* it annotates.
|
|
65
|
+
|
|
66
|
+
2. After normalization, re-evaluate each item:
|
|
67
|
+
- Still contains substantive content -> keep for classification in Step 5.
|
|
68
|
+
- Was entirely a cross-reference with no independent semantic value -> drop it (it is a pointer, not knowledge).
|
|
69
|
+
3. Any normalization that removes content from a `modify` item (where the item modifies an existing entry) must be flagged in the update plan (Step 6, Table 6b) so the user can verify the substantive meaning was preserved.
|
|
70
|
+
|
|
71
|
+
### Step 5: Classify Artifact Content
|
|
72
|
+
|
|
73
|
+
- **What**: classify each normalized item against the section map from Step 2.
|
|
74
|
+
- **How**:
|
|
75
|
+
1. For each item, match to a section from the Step 2 map:
|
|
48
76
|
- Match by semantic similarity to **section title + 1-line summary**, not by exact string.
|
|
49
77
|
- Confidence levels:
|
|
50
78
|
- **mapped**: exactly one section matches with high confidence
|
|
51
79
|
- **ambiguous**: 2+ sections plausibly match
|
|
52
80
|
- **orphan**: no section matches; propose a new section name
|
|
53
|
-
|
|
81
|
+
2. For each item, also detect change type relative to current section content:
|
|
54
82
|
- `new` -- target section does not contain this entity
|
|
55
83
|
- `modify` -- target section mentions the entity but artifact provides a different value
|
|
56
84
|
- `redundant` -- already present, no change (will be filtered out, not shown to user)
|
|
57
85
|
|
|
58
|
-
### Step
|
|
86
|
+
### Step 6: Render the Update Plan (Four Tables)
|
|
59
87
|
|
|
60
|
-
####
|
|
88
|
+
#### 6a. Section-mapped items
|
|
61
89
|
| # | change-id | item | type | target section | classification |
|
|
62
90
|
|---|-----------|------|------|----------------|----------------|
|
|
63
91
|
|
|
64
|
-
####
|
|
92
|
+
#### 6b. Conflicts requiring resolution (every `modify` item)
|
|
65
93
|
| # | item | section | current value | proposed value (from {change-id}) |
|
|
66
94
|
|---|------|---------|---------------|-----------------------------------|
|
|
67
95
|
|
|
68
|
-
####
|
|
96
|
+
#### 6c. Ambiguous and orphan items
|
|
69
97
|
| # | item | reason | candidate sections (or proposed new section) |
|
|
70
98
|
|---|------|--------|----------------------------------------------|
|
|
71
99
|
|
|
72
|
-
####
|
|
100
|
+
#### 6d. Implied yaml changes
|
|
73
101
|
| # | yaml field | current | proposed |
|
|
74
102
|
|---|------------|---------|----------|
|
|
75
103
|
|
|
76
|
-
### Step
|
|
104
|
+
### Step 7: User Confirmation (Per-Table)
|
|
77
105
|
|
|
78
|
-
- **
|
|
79
|
-
- **
|
|
80
|
-
- **
|
|
81
|
-
- **
|
|
106
|
+
- **6a**: default = accept all. User input: indices to drop, or `e <n>` to edit a single item's target section.
|
|
107
|
+
- **6b**: **explicit per-row decision required**. Format `<index>:<keep|replace|edit>`. Example: `1:replace,2:keep,3:edit`. No default.
|
|
108
|
+
- **6c**: per row, user picks an existing section, types a new section name, or `skip`.
|
|
109
|
+
- **6d**: default = accept; user can drop indices.
|
|
82
110
|
|
|
83
111
|
Then ask: **"Run optional read-only code verification before applying? (y/n)"**
|
|
84
112
|
|
|
85
|
-
### Step
|
|
113
|
+
### Step 8: (Optional) Read-only Code Verification
|
|
86
114
|
|
|
87
115
|
This step catches artifacts claiming entities never actually delivered. It is **read-only** -- it never writes anything to `.md` or `.yaml`.
|
|
88
116
|
|
|
@@ -101,9 +129,9 @@ If user opts in:
|
|
|
101
129
|
|
|
102
130
|
3. Re-render the apply list with `verified` / `unverified` markers; final confirmation.
|
|
103
131
|
|
|
104
|
-
If user skips verification: proceed directly to Step
|
|
132
|
+
If user skips verification: proceed directly to Step 9 with Step 7 selections.
|
|
105
133
|
|
|
106
|
-
### Step
|
|
134
|
+
### Step 9: Apply Updates (Merge Mode)
|
|
107
135
|
|
|
108
136
|
- **Pre-write**:
|
|
109
137
|
1. Backup: `project-context.md` -> `project-context.md.bak`; `project-context.yaml` -> `project-context.yaml.bak`. Overwrite any prior `.bak`.
|
|
@@ -114,15 +142,16 @@ If user skips verification: proceed directly to Step 7 with Step 5 selections.
|
|
|
114
142
|
2. Each `modify` item with `replace`: replace the matching line in place. Smallest possible diff.
|
|
115
143
|
3. Each `orphan` item with new-section choice: append a new `##` section at end of file.
|
|
116
144
|
4. **Never delete** any existing line. **Never reorder** existing sections.
|
|
145
|
+
5. All merged content must already be normalized per Step 4 rules. Do not re-introduce stripped references during inline replacement or append operations.
|
|
117
146
|
|
|
118
147
|
- **Update `project-context.yaml`** (structured merge):
|
|
119
|
-
1. Apply accepted entries from Table
|
|
148
|
+
1. Apply accepted entries from Table 6d.
|
|
120
149
|
2. Add new `source_paths` to matching project entry; add new modules to `modules[]`.
|
|
121
150
|
3. **Never delete** an existing yaml entry in this skill.
|
|
122
151
|
|
|
123
152
|
- **Atomicity**: temp + rename per file. If `.md` write succeeds but `.yaml` fails (or vice versa) -> restore the failed one from `.bak`, keep the other; report partial success.
|
|
124
153
|
|
|
125
|
-
### Step
|
|
154
|
+
### Step 10: Report
|
|
126
155
|
|
|
127
156
|
1. **Applied summary** -- counts: items added / modified / skipped / orphaned-into-new-section
|
|
128
157
|
2. **Files changed** -- paths + byte deltas
|
|
@@ -136,7 +165,7 @@ If user skips verification: proceed directly to Step 7 with Step 5 selections.
|
|
|
136
165
|
- Aggregated >= 1 change -> "Run `/mvt-cleanup` to archive these completed changes."
|
|
137
166
|
- Verification flagged code-only entities -> "Run `/mvt-analyze-code` to capture missing entities."
|
|
138
167
|
|
|
139
|
-
### Step
|
|
168
|
+
### Step 11: State Update
|
|
140
169
|
Apply the State Update rules defined in the **State Update** section below.
|
|
141
170
|
- The `--set-synced` parameter updates `session.last_synced_at`.
|
|
142
171
|
|
|
@@ -149,7 +178,7 @@ Apply the State Update rules defined in the **State Update** section below.
|
|
|
149
178
|
| Selected change-id has only `plan.yaml` | Filtered in Step 1; will not appear |
|
|
150
179
|
| `modify` with `replace` but the existing line cannot be located deterministically | Fall back to append + flag as duplicate-needs-manual-edit; do NOT silently overwrite the wrong line |
|
|
151
180
|
| `.md.bak` already exists | Overwrite (only the most recent backup matters) |
|
|
152
|
-
| User aborts at Step
|
|
153
|
-
| Step
|
|
154
|
-
| Two artifacts contradict each other (
|
|
155
|
-
| change-id was archived between Step 1 and Step
|
|
181
|
+
| User aborts at Step 7 | Do not write; report "no changes applied" |
|
|
182
|
+
| Step 8 verification finds zero matches for everything | Strong warning; require explicit confirm before proceeding (artifacts likely describe planned, not delivered, work) |
|
|
183
|
+
| Two artifacts contradict each other (analysis claims rule X, implementation realizes rule Y) | Surface in Table 6b as cross-artifact conflict; user picks |
|
|
184
|
+
| change-id was archived between Step 1 and Step 9 | Skip with note; do not error the run |
|
|
@@ -60,6 +60,9 @@ sections:
|
|
|
60
60
|
- type: shared
|
|
61
61
|
source: sections/output-language-constraint.md
|
|
62
62
|
|
|
63
|
+
- type: shared
|
|
64
|
+
source: sections/output-format-constraint.md
|
|
65
|
+
|
|
63
66
|
- type: shared
|
|
64
67
|
source: sections/activation-preflight.md
|
|
65
68
|
params:
|
|
@@ -73,6 +76,9 @@ sections:
|
|
|
73
76
|
level: "BLOCK"
|
|
74
77
|
message: "project-context.md not found. Run `/mvt-analyze-code` to create the initial document; this skill only handles incremental updates."
|
|
75
78
|
|
|
79
|
+
- type: shared
|
|
80
|
+
source: sections/project-context-profile.md
|
|
81
|
+
|
|
76
82
|
- type: file
|
|
77
83
|
source: ./business.md
|
|
78
84
|
|
|
@@ -23,43 +23,45 @@ Resolution rules:
|
|
|
23
23
|
2. Parse YAML; if parse fails or schema is invalid -> stop and report. Do not attempt to repair silently.
|
|
24
24
|
3. Verify the target `task_id` exists in `tasks[]`. If not, list valid ids and stop.
|
|
25
25
|
|
|
26
|
-
### Step 3: Apply the Update
|
|
26
|
+
### Step 3: Apply the Update, Recompute, Validate, and Write (via script)
|
|
27
27
|
|
|
28
|
-
|
|
28
|
+
The mechanical work — mutating the task, recomputing `current_task` via the DAG
|
|
29
|
+
rules, validating the result, and writing back atomically — is performed by a
|
|
30
|
+
deterministic script. Do NOT hand-edit `plan.yaml` or reason through the
|
|
31
|
+
`current_task` selection yourself; call the script with the resolved arguments
|
|
32
|
+
from Step 1–2:
|
|
29
33
|
|
|
30
|
-
|
|
31
|
-
|
|
32
|
-
|
|
33
|
-
4. If `notes` provided -> overwrite `tasks[i].notes`.
|
|
34
|
-
5. Update `plan.updated_at` to current ISO 8601 timestamp.
|
|
34
|
+
```bash
|
|
35
|
+
node .ai-agents/scripts/plan-update.cjs --plan "<active_change.plan_path>" --task <task_id> --status <new_status> [--artifacts "<comma,separated,paths>"] [--notes "<note text>"]
|
|
36
|
+
```
|
|
35
37
|
|
|
36
|
-
|
|
38
|
+
Include `--artifacts` only if artifacts were provided, and `--notes` only if a note was provided; omit each flag otherwise.
|
|
37
39
|
|
|
38
|
-
|
|
40
|
+
| Argument | Value source |
|
|
41
|
+
|----------|-------------|
|
|
42
|
+
| `--plan` | `active_change.plan_path` resolved from session.yaml |
|
|
43
|
+
| `--task` | the `task_id` resolved in Step 1 |
|
|
44
|
+
| `--status` | the `new_status` resolved in Step 1 (`pending`/`in_progress`/`done`/`blocked`/`skipped`) |
|
|
45
|
+
| `--artifacts` | optional; comma-separated paths to append (the script de-duplicates) |
|
|
46
|
+
| `--notes` | optional; overwrites the task's `notes` |
|
|
39
47
|
|
|
40
|
-
|
|
41
|
-
2. Otherwise pick the first task (by array order) where:
|
|
42
|
-
- `status == pending`
|
|
43
|
-
- All ids in `depends_on` reference tasks with status `done`
|
|
44
|
-
3. If no such task exists AND every task is `done` -> set `plan.status = done`, `current_task = null`.
|
|
45
|
-
4. If no such task exists but some tasks are still `pending` (because their dependencies are not done -- e.g., everything reachable is blocked) -> set `current_task = null`, leave `plan.status = in_progress`. Surface a warning in the output ("All remaining tasks are blocked by dependencies; resolve a blocker before continuing").
|
|
48
|
+
The script performs, deterministically:
|
|
46
49
|
|
|
47
|
-
|
|
50
|
+
1. **Apply**: sets the task status; appends + de-duplicates `--artifacts` (handles `artifacts: null`); overwrites `--notes`; sets `completed_at` to now when status is `done`, else `null`; refreshes `plan.updated_at`.
|
|
51
|
+
2. **Recompute `current_task`** (same rules as before): an `in_progress` task that is not the one just moved to terminal wins; else the first `pending` task whose `depends_on` are all `done` (promoted to `in_progress`); else if all tasks are `done` set `plan.status = done` and `current_task = null`; else `current_task = null` with a blocked-by-dependencies warning.
|
|
52
|
+
3. **Validate** the mutated plan (unique ids, valid `depends_on` references, DAG/no-cycle, ≤1 `in_progress`, every task has acceptance, `completed_at` consistency, `current_task` validity).
|
|
53
|
+
4. **Write atomically** (temp + rename) only if validation passes.
|
|
48
54
|
|
|
49
|
-
|
|
55
|
+
**Interpreting the result:**
|
|
50
56
|
|
|
51
|
-
|
|
52
|
-
|
|
53
|
-
|
|
57
|
+
- **Exit 0**: success. stdout is a single-line JSON object:
|
|
58
|
+
```json
|
|
59
|
+
{"ok":true,"task":{"id":"t1","title":"...","old_status":"in_progress","new_status":"done"},"current_task":"t2","plan_status":"in_progress","progress":{"done":1,"total":4},"warning":null}
|
|
60
|
+
```
|
|
61
|
+
Use these fields directly to render the Output Format block. The file is already written — do NOT read it back to verify. If `warning` is non-null, surface it.
|
|
62
|
+
- **Exit 1**: failure. stderr carries the error (invalid status, task not found, validation failure, parse/write error). The file was **not** modified. Report the error to the user and do not fabricate a success summary.
|
|
54
63
|
|
|
55
|
-
### Step
|
|
56
|
-
|
|
57
|
-
Apply the State Update rules defined in the **State Update** section below, AND the update-plan-specific updates:
|
|
58
|
-
|
|
59
|
-
- Refresh the matching entry in `changes[]`: `updated_at` -> current ISO 8601 timestamp.
|
|
60
|
-
- Do NOT touch `active_change.plan_path`.
|
|
61
|
-
|
|
62
|
-
### Step 7: Output
|
|
64
|
+
### Step 4: Output
|
|
63
65
|
|
|
64
66
|
Emit the Plan Update summary block defined in the Output Format section. Include:
|
|
65
67
|
|