@udibo/oauth2 0.39.0 → 0.40.0
This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
package/dist/identity/otp.d.ts
CHANGED
|
@@ -67,8 +67,10 @@ export interface OtpStore {
|
|
|
67
67
|
/** Persist a new active record. */
|
|
68
68
|
create(record: OtpRecord): Promise<void>;
|
|
69
69
|
/**
|
|
70
|
-
* The
|
|
71
|
-
*
|
|
70
|
+
* The active record with the greatest `createdAt` for `(email, purpose)`, or
|
|
71
|
+
* `null` — ordered by `createdAt`, never by insertion, since `consume`
|
|
72
|
+
* retires records by the same field. Must still return an expired record —
|
|
73
|
+
* the service reports expiry itself.
|
|
72
74
|
*/
|
|
73
75
|
findActive(email: string, purpose: string): Promise<OtpRecord | null>;
|
|
74
76
|
/**
|
|
@@ -84,6 +86,13 @@ export interface OtpStore {
|
|
|
84
86
|
* Atomically consume an active code. Return `true` only to the caller that
|
|
85
87
|
* removed it from the active set; concurrent or repeated claims return
|
|
86
88
|
* `false`. Use a conditional delete/update with RETURNING in persistent stores.
|
|
89
|
+
*
|
|
90
|
+
* A successful claim also deactivates every other active record for the same
|
|
91
|
+
* `(email, purpose)` created no later than the claimed one, in the same
|
|
92
|
+
* atomic operation, so a sign-in with the newest code leaves no older code
|
|
93
|
+
* redeemable. Records created after it, other pairs, and — when the claim
|
|
94
|
+
* fails — every record stay active. A store that keeps one active code per
|
|
95
|
+
* pair already satisfies this.
|
|
87
96
|
*/
|
|
88
97
|
consume(id: string): Promise<boolean>;
|
|
89
98
|
/**
|
|
@@ -91,7 +100,8 @@ export interface OtpStore {
|
|
|
91
100
|
* the send carrying it failed. Separate from {@link OtpStore.consume} so a
|
|
92
101
|
* store that records *why* a code left the active set can tell a redeemed
|
|
93
102
|
* code from a discarded one, and from {@link OtpStore.invalidate} so a
|
|
94
|
-
* concurrent request's
|
|
103
|
+
* concurrent request's code survives, older or newer. Unlike `consume`, it
|
|
104
|
+
* deactivates no other record. A no-op for an unknown id.
|
|
95
105
|
*/
|
|
96
106
|
invalidateById(id: string): Promise<void>;
|
|
97
107
|
/** Deactivate every active record for `(email, purpose)`. */
|
|
@@ -237,7 +247,9 @@ export declare class EmailOtpService {
|
|
|
237
247
|
* value — **before** the compare, so concurrent verifies of one live code
|
|
238
248
|
* can't each test a guess against a stale pre-increment count: at most
|
|
239
249
|
* `maxAttempts` guesses ever reach the comparison. Spending the budget
|
|
240
|
-
* invalidates the code (`locked`); success consumes it (single-use)
|
|
250
|
+
* invalidates the code (`locked`); success consumes it (single-use) and,
|
|
251
|
+
* through {@link OtpStore.consume}, retires any older code for the pair that
|
|
252
|
+
* overlapping requests left active.
|
|
241
253
|
*/
|
|
242
254
|
verify(options: VerifyOtpOptions): Promise<VerifyOtpResult>;
|
|
243
255
|
}
|
|
@@ -249,11 +261,18 @@ export declare class MemoryOtpStore implements OtpStore {
|
|
|
249
261
|
#private;
|
|
250
262
|
/** Persist a record and mark it active. */
|
|
251
263
|
create(record: OtpRecord): Promise<void>;
|
|
252
|
-
/**
|
|
264
|
+
/**
|
|
265
|
+
* The active record with the greatest `createdAt` for `(email, purpose)`,
|
|
266
|
+
* expired or not; else `null`.
|
|
267
|
+
*/
|
|
253
268
|
findActive(email: string, purpose: string): Promise<OtpRecord | null>;
|
|
254
269
|
/** Bump a record's attempt count; returns the new count, or 0 if unknown. */
|
|
255
270
|
recordAttempt(id: string): Promise<number>;
|
|
256
|
-
/**
|
|
271
|
+
/**
|
|
272
|
+
* Atomically deactivate one active record and, when it was claimed, the
|
|
273
|
+
* older active records for its `(email, purpose)`; return whether it was
|
|
274
|
+
* claimed.
|
|
275
|
+
*/
|
|
257
276
|
consume(id: string): Promise<boolean>;
|
|
258
277
|
/** Deactivate one undelivered record; a no-op if the id is unknown. */
|
|
259
278
|
invalidateById(id: string): Promise<void>;
|
package/dist/identity/otp.js
CHANGED
|
@@ -160,7 +160,9 @@ export class EmailOtpService {
|
|
|
160
160
|
* value — **before** the compare, so concurrent verifies of one live code
|
|
161
161
|
* can't each test a guess against a stale pre-increment count: at most
|
|
162
162
|
* `maxAttempts` guesses ever reach the comparison. Spending the budget
|
|
163
|
-
* invalidates the code (`locked`); success consumes it (single-use)
|
|
163
|
+
* invalidates the code (`locked`); success consumes it (single-use) and,
|
|
164
|
+
* through {@link OtpStore.consume}, retires any older code for the pair that
|
|
165
|
+
* overlapping requests left active.
|
|
164
166
|
*/
|
|
165
167
|
async verify(options) {
|
|
166
168
|
const { purpose } = options;
|
|
@@ -204,7 +206,10 @@ export class MemoryOtpStore {
|
|
|
204
206
|
this.#active.add(record.id);
|
|
205
207
|
return Promise.resolve();
|
|
206
208
|
}
|
|
207
|
-
/**
|
|
209
|
+
/**
|
|
210
|
+
* The active record with the greatest `createdAt` for `(email, purpose)`,
|
|
211
|
+
* expired or not; else `null`.
|
|
212
|
+
*/
|
|
208
213
|
findActive(email, purpose) {
|
|
209
214
|
let latest = null;
|
|
210
215
|
for (const id of this.#active) {
|
|
@@ -226,9 +231,25 @@ export class MemoryOtpStore {
|
|
|
226
231
|
record.attempts++;
|
|
227
232
|
return Promise.resolve(record.attempts);
|
|
228
233
|
}
|
|
229
|
-
/**
|
|
234
|
+
/**
|
|
235
|
+
* Atomically deactivate one active record and, when it was claimed, the
|
|
236
|
+
* older active records for its `(email, purpose)`; return whether it was
|
|
237
|
+
* claimed.
|
|
238
|
+
*/
|
|
230
239
|
consume(id) {
|
|
231
|
-
|
|
240
|
+
const claimed = this.#records.get(id);
|
|
241
|
+
if (!claimed || !this.#active.delete(id))
|
|
242
|
+
return Promise.resolve(false);
|
|
243
|
+
for (const activeId of [...this.#active]) {
|
|
244
|
+
const record = this.#records.get(activeId);
|
|
245
|
+
if (record &&
|
|
246
|
+
record.email === claimed.email &&
|
|
247
|
+
record.purpose === claimed.purpose &&
|
|
248
|
+
record.createdAt <= claimed.createdAt) {
|
|
249
|
+
this.#active.delete(activeId);
|
|
250
|
+
}
|
|
251
|
+
}
|
|
252
|
+
return Promise.resolve(true);
|
|
232
253
|
}
|
|
233
254
|
/** Deactivate one undelivered record; a no-op if the id is unknown. */
|
|
234
255
|
invalidateById(id) {
|
|
@@ -5,7 +5,9 @@
|
|
|
5
5
|
* A six-digit code is guessable online, so the attempt budget is the only thing
|
|
6
6
|
* standing between an attacker and a one-in-a-million draw. `recordAttempt` is
|
|
7
7
|
* what enforces it, and it only enforces it when concurrent guesses cannot
|
|
8
|
-
* share a count — which is what this suite checks.
|
|
8
|
+
* share a count — which is what this suite checks. It also checks that a
|
|
9
|
+
* successful `consume` retires the pair's older codes, so a sign-in with the
|
|
10
|
+
* newest code leaves no earlier one redeemable.
|
|
9
11
|
*
|
|
10
12
|
* @example Verify a database-backed store
|
|
11
13
|
* ```ts
|
|
@@ -22,7 +24,7 @@
|
|
|
22
24
|
*
|
|
23
25
|
* @module
|
|
24
26
|
*/
|
|
25
|
-
import type
|
|
27
|
+
import { type OtpStore } from "../../identity/otp.ts";
|
|
26
28
|
/** Options for {@link runOtpStoreContractTests}. */
|
|
27
29
|
export interface OtpStoreContractOptions {
|
|
28
30
|
/**
|
|
@@ -31,6 +33,19 @@ export interface OtpStoreContractOptions {
|
|
|
31
33
|
* meaningless.
|
|
32
34
|
*/
|
|
33
35
|
makeStore(): Promise<OtpStore> | OtpStore;
|
|
36
|
+
/**
|
|
37
|
+
* Set to `true` for a store that keeps at most one active code per
|
|
38
|
+
* `(email, purpose)`, where `create` replaces the pair's code — for example
|
|
39
|
+
* an upsert on a unique `(email, purpose)` index. Such a store conforms: the
|
|
40
|
+
* suite then requires `create` to replace the code, so the replaced code's
|
|
41
|
+
* id no longer consumes, and drops the cases that need two codes active at
|
|
42
|
+
* once. The trade-off is availability: when overlapping requests each send a
|
|
43
|
+
* code and the later send fails, discarding the later code leaves no code
|
|
44
|
+
* the user can enter, where a store keeping several codes leaves the one
|
|
45
|
+
* already delivered. Defaults to `false`; a store that keeps several codes
|
|
46
|
+
* and sets it fails the replacement case.
|
|
47
|
+
*/
|
|
48
|
+
oneActiveCode?: boolean;
|
|
34
49
|
/**
|
|
35
50
|
* Overrides the name passed to the outer `describe` block. Defaults to
|
|
36
51
|
* `"OtpStore contract"`.
|
|
@@ -46,6 +61,10 @@ export interface OtpStoreContractOptions {
|
|
|
46
61
|
*
|
|
47
62
|
* The concurrency case fires overlapping `recordAttempt` calls and requires
|
|
48
63
|
* each to see a distinct count; a store that reads, awaits, then writes hands
|
|
49
|
-
* the same count to every guess and fails it.
|
|
64
|
+
* the same count to every guess and fails it. The `consume` cases require a
|
|
65
|
+
* successful claim to retire every older active code for the pair, and to
|
|
66
|
+
* leave newer codes, other pairs and — when the claim fails — everything else
|
|
67
|
+
* active. Register a store that keeps one code per pair with
|
|
68
|
+
* `oneActiveCode: true`.
|
|
50
69
|
*/
|
|
51
70
|
export declare function runOtpStoreContractTests(options: OtpStoreContractOptions): void;
|
|
@@ -5,7 +5,9 @@
|
|
|
5
5
|
* A six-digit code is guessable online, so the attempt budget is the only thing
|
|
6
6
|
* standing between an attacker and a one-in-a-million draw. `recordAttempt` is
|
|
7
7
|
* what enforces it, and it only enforces it when concurrent guesses cannot
|
|
8
|
-
* share a count — which is what this suite checks.
|
|
8
|
+
* share a count — which is what this suite checks. It also checks that a
|
|
9
|
+
* successful `consume` retires the pair's older codes, so a sign-in with the
|
|
10
|
+
* newest code leaves no earlier one redeemable.
|
|
9
11
|
*
|
|
10
12
|
* @example Verify a database-backed store
|
|
11
13
|
* ```ts
|
|
@@ -23,6 +25,7 @@
|
|
|
23
25
|
* @module
|
|
24
26
|
*/
|
|
25
27
|
import { assert, beforeEach, describe, expect, it } from "vitest";
|
|
28
|
+
import { EmailOtpService, } from "../../identity/otp.js";
|
|
26
29
|
import { CONCURRENT_CALLERS, race } from "./_race.js";
|
|
27
30
|
const EMAIL = "user@example.com";
|
|
28
31
|
const OTHER_EMAIL = "other@example.com";
|
|
@@ -51,9 +54,15 @@ function record(overrides = {}) {
|
|
|
51
54
|
*
|
|
52
55
|
* The concurrency case fires overlapping `recordAttempt` calls and requires
|
|
53
56
|
* each to see a distinct count; a store that reads, awaits, then writes hands
|
|
54
|
-
* the same count to every guess and fails it.
|
|
57
|
+
* the same count to every guess and fails it. The `consume` cases require a
|
|
58
|
+
* successful claim to retire every older active code for the pair, and to
|
|
59
|
+
* leave newer codes, other pairs and — when the claim fails — everything else
|
|
60
|
+
* active. Register a store that keeps one code per pair with
|
|
61
|
+
* `oneActiveCode: true`.
|
|
55
62
|
*/
|
|
56
63
|
export function runOtpStoreContractTests(options) {
|
|
64
|
+
const oneActiveCode = options.oneActiveCode ?? false;
|
|
65
|
+
const manyActiveCodes = !oneActiveCode;
|
|
57
66
|
describe(options.describeName ?? "OtpStore contract", () => {
|
|
58
67
|
let store;
|
|
59
68
|
beforeEach(async () => {
|
|
@@ -84,6 +93,31 @@ export function runOtpStoreContractTests(options) {
|
|
|
84
93
|
await store.create(newer);
|
|
85
94
|
expect((await store.findActive(EMAIL, PURPOSE))?.id, "a re-send supersedes the code before it").toBe(newer.id);
|
|
86
95
|
});
|
|
96
|
+
if (oneActiveCode) {
|
|
97
|
+
it("replaces the pair's active code (oneActiveCode)", async () => {
|
|
98
|
+
const now = Date.now();
|
|
99
|
+
const older = record({ createdAt: now - 1000, codeHash: "old" });
|
|
100
|
+
const newer = record({ createdAt: now, codeHash: "new" });
|
|
101
|
+
await store.create(older);
|
|
102
|
+
await store.create(newer);
|
|
103
|
+
expect(await store.consume(older.id), "`oneActiveCode: true` declares that a new code replaces the " +
|
|
104
|
+
"pair's code; this store kept the older one active").toBe(false);
|
|
105
|
+
expect((await store.findActive(EMAIL, PURPOSE))?.id).toBe(newer.id);
|
|
106
|
+
});
|
|
107
|
+
it.skip("a store keeping one code per pair returns the code created last, whatever its createdAt — there is no other code to order it against (oneActiveCode: true)", () => { });
|
|
108
|
+
}
|
|
109
|
+
else {
|
|
110
|
+
it("returns the greatest createdAt, not the last inserted", async () => {
|
|
111
|
+
const now = Date.now();
|
|
112
|
+
const higher = record({ createdAt: now });
|
|
113
|
+
const lower = record({ createdAt: now - 1000 });
|
|
114
|
+
await store.create(higher);
|
|
115
|
+
await store.create(lower);
|
|
116
|
+
expect((await store.findActive(EMAIL, PURPOSE))?.id, "verify consumes the record findActive returns and consume " +
|
|
117
|
+
"retires records created no later than it; ordering by " +
|
|
118
|
+
"insertion under clock drift leaves the other code redeemable").toBe(higher.id);
|
|
119
|
+
});
|
|
120
|
+
}
|
|
87
121
|
it("returns an expired record rather than hiding it", async () => {
|
|
88
122
|
await store.create(record({ expiresAt: Date.now() - 1000 }));
|
|
89
123
|
assert((await store.findActive(EMAIL, PURPOSE)) !== null, "expiry is the service's call — it reports `expired` distinctly " +
|
|
@@ -110,14 +144,56 @@ export function runOtpStoreContractTests(options) {
|
|
|
110
144
|
await store.consume(created.id);
|
|
111
145
|
expect(await store.findActive(EMAIL, PURPOSE)).toBe(null);
|
|
112
146
|
});
|
|
113
|
-
it("
|
|
147
|
+
it("retires every older active code for the pair", async () => {
|
|
114
148
|
const now = Date.now();
|
|
149
|
+
const oldest = record({ createdAt: now - 2000 });
|
|
115
150
|
const older = record({ createdAt: now - 1000 });
|
|
116
|
-
const
|
|
151
|
+
const newest = record({ createdAt: now });
|
|
152
|
+
await store.create(oldest);
|
|
117
153
|
await store.create(older);
|
|
118
|
-
await store.create(
|
|
119
|
-
await store.consume(
|
|
120
|
-
expect(
|
|
154
|
+
await store.create(newest);
|
|
155
|
+
expect(await store.consume(newest.id)).toBe(true);
|
|
156
|
+
expect(await store.findActive(EMAIL, PURPOSE), "a sign-in with the newest code must end the older codes' window; " +
|
|
157
|
+
"otherwise each stays redeemable until it expires").toBe(null);
|
|
158
|
+
expect(await store.consume(older.id)).toBe(false);
|
|
159
|
+
expect(await store.consume(oldest.id)).toBe(false);
|
|
160
|
+
});
|
|
161
|
+
if (manyActiveCodes) {
|
|
162
|
+
it("leaves a code newer than the claimed one active", async () => {
|
|
163
|
+
const now = Date.now();
|
|
164
|
+
const claimed = record({ createdAt: now - 1000 });
|
|
165
|
+
const newer = record({ createdAt: now });
|
|
166
|
+
await store.create(claimed);
|
|
167
|
+
await store.create(newer);
|
|
168
|
+
expect(await store.consume(claimed.id)).toBe(true);
|
|
169
|
+
expect((await store.findActive(EMAIL, PURPOSE))?.id, "a code a concurrent request minted after the claimed one " +
|
|
170
|
+
"is not older than it and must survive").toBe(newer.id);
|
|
171
|
+
});
|
|
172
|
+
it("retires nothing when the claim fails", async () => {
|
|
173
|
+
const now = Date.now();
|
|
174
|
+
const older = record({ createdAt: now - 1000 });
|
|
175
|
+
const discarded = record({ createdAt: now });
|
|
176
|
+
await store.create(older);
|
|
177
|
+
await store.create(discarded);
|
|
178
|
+
await store.invalidateById(discarded.id);
|
|
179
|
+
expect(await store.consume(discarded.id)).toBe(false);
|
|
180
|
+
expect((await store.findActive(EMAIL, PURPOSE))?.id, "only a successful claim retires older codes; a stale or " +
|
|
181
|
+
"repeated consume must leave the delivered code usable").toBe(older.id);
|
|
182
|
+
});
|
|
183
|
+
}
|
|
184
|
+
else {
|
|
185
|
+
it.skip("a store keeping one code per pair has no newer or older code beside the claimed one — a re-send replaces the code a sign-in is verifying, so that sign-in reports invalid and the user enters the new code (oneActiveCode: true)", () => { });
|
|
186
|
+
}
|
|
187
|
+
it("leaves other emails and other purposes active", async () => {
|
|
188
|
+
const claimed = record();
|
|
189
|
+
const otherEmail = record({ email: OTHER_EMAIL });
|
|
190
|
+
const otherPurpose = record({ purpose: OTHER_PURPOSE });
|
|
191
|
+
await store.create(claimed);
|
|
192
|
+
await store.create(otherEmail);
|
|
193
|
+
await store.create(otherPurpose);
|
|
194
|
+
expect(await store.consume(claimed.id)).toBe(true);
|
|
195
|
+
expect((await store.findActive(OTHER_EMAIL, PURPOSE))?.id).toBe(otherEmail.id);
|
|
196
|
+
expect((await store.findActive(EMAIL, OTHER_PURPOSE))?.id).toBe(otherPurpose.id);
|
|
121
197
|
});
|
|
122
198
|
it("is a no-op for an unknown id", async () => {
|
|
123
199
|
const created = record();
|
|
@@ -127,15 +203,30 @@ export function runOtpStoreContractTests(options) {
|
|
|
127
203
|
});
|
|
128
204
|
});
|
|
129
205
|
describe("invalidateById", () => {
|
|
130
|
-
|
|
206
|
+
if (manyActiveCodes) {
|
|
207
|
+
it("deactivates only the named record", async () => {
|
|
208
|
+
const now = Date.now();
|
|
209
|
+
const undelivered = record({ createdAt: now });
|
|
210
|
+
const previous = record({ createdAt: now - 1000 });
|
|
211
|
+
await store.create(previous);
|
|
212
|
+
await store.create(undelivered);
|
|
213
|
+
await store.invalidateById(undelivered.id);
|
|
214
|
+
expect((await store.findActive(EMAIL, PURPOSE))?.id, "discarding an undeliverable code must not take a concurrent " +
|
|
215
|
+
"request's code with it").toBe(previous.id);
|
|
216
|
+
});
|
|
217
|
+
}
|
|
218
|
+
else {
|
|
219
|
+
it.skip("a store keeping one code per pair has no older code to keep — when overlapping requests each send a code and the later send fails, discarding it leaves no code the user can enter (oneActiveCode: true)", () => { });
|
|
220
|
+
}
|
|
221
|
+
it("leaves a newer code active", async () => {
|
|
131
222
|
const now = Date.now();
|
|
132
|
-
const
|
|
133
|
-
const
|
|
134
|
-
await store.create(
|
|
135
|
-
await store.create(
|
|
136
|
-
await store.invalidateById(
|
|
137
|
-
expect((await store.findActive(EMAIL, PURPOSE))?.id, "
|
|
138
|
-
"
|
|
223
|
+
const older = record({ createdAt: now - 1000 });
|
|
224
|
+
const newer = record({ createdAt: now });
|
|
225
|
+
await store.create(older);
|
|
226
|
+
await store.create(newer);
|
|
227
|
+
await store.invalidateById(older.id);
|
|
228
|
+
expect((await store.findActive(EMAIL, PURPOSE))?.id, "a slow failed send discards its own code, never the code a " +
|
|
229
|
+
"retry has since delivered").toBe(newer.id);
|
|
139
230
|
});
|
|
140
231
|
it("is a no-op for an unknown id", async () => {
|
|
141
232
|
const created = record();
|
|
@@ -193,5 +284,46 @@ export function runOtpStoreContractTests(options) {
|
|
|
193
284
|
"rest through").toStrictEqual([1, 2, 3, 4, 5]);
|
|
194
285
|
});
|
|
195
286
|
});
|
|
287
|
+
describe("EmailOtpService over the store", () => {
|
|
288
|
+
it("leaves no older code redeemable after a successful verify", async () => {
|
|
289
|
+
const overlapping = new EmailOtpService({
|
|
290
|
+
store: {
|
|
291
|
+
create: (created) => store.create(created),
|
|
292
|
+
findActive: (email, purpose) => store.findActive(email, purpose),
|
|
293
|
+
recordAttempt: (id) => store.recordAttempt(id),
|
|
294
|
+
consume: (id) => store.consume(id),
|
|
295
|
+
invalidateById: (id) => store.invalidateById(id),
|
|
296
|
+
invalidate: () => Promise.resolve(),
|
|
297
|
+
},
|
|
298
|
+
});
|
|
299
|
+
const codes = new Map();
|
|
300
|
+
for (let i = 0; i < 2; i++) {
|
|
301
|
+
await overlapping.request({
|
|
302
|
+
email: EMAIL,
|
|
303
|
+
purpose: PURPOSE,
|
|
304
|
+
onDeliver: (code, _expiresAt, codeId) => {
|
|
305
|
+
codes.set(codeId, code);
|
|
306
|
+
},
|
|
307
|
+
});
|
|
308
|
+
}
|
|
309
|
+
const newest = await store.findActive(EMAIL, PURPOSE);
|
|
310
|
+
assert(newest !== null, "a requested code must be findable");
|
|
311
|
+
const newestCode = codes.get(newest.id);
|
|
312
|
+
const olderCode = [...codes].find(([id]) => id !== newest.id)?.[1];
|
|
313
|
+
assert(newestCode !== undefined && olderCode !== undefined);
|
|
314
|
+
const service = new EmailOtpService({ store });
|
|
315
|
+
expect(await service.verify({
|
|
316
|
+
email: EMAIL,
|
|
317
|
+
purpose: PURPOSE,
|
|
318
|
+
code: newestCode,
|
|
319
|
+
})).toStrictEqual({ status: "success" });
|
|
320
|
+
expect(await service.verify({
|
|
321
|
+
email: EMAIL,
|
|
322
|
+
purpose: PURPOSE,
|
|
323
|
+
code: olderCode,
|
|
324
|
+
}), "two overlapping requests left two codes; signing in with the " +
|
|
325
|
+
"newest must not leave the older one redeemable").toStrictEqual({ status: "invalid" });
|
|
326
|
+
});
|
|
327
|
+
});
|
|
196
328
|
});
|
|
197
329
|
}
|
package/package.json
CHANGED
|
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
|
|
|
1
1
|
{
|
|
2
2
|
"name": "@udibo/oauth2",
|
|
3
|
-
"version": "0.
|
|
3
|
+
"version": "0.40.0",
|
|
4
4
|
"description": "A flexible OAuth2 toolkit: framework-agnostic authorization & resource servers, a typed client, Hono adapters (including a backend-for-frontend), and React bindings.",
|
|
5
5
|
"keywords": [
|
|
6
6
|
"authorization-server",
|