@tyvm/knowhow 0.0.159 → 0.0.161

package/tests/patching/regression-2026.test.ts

@@ -1,752 +0,0 @@
-import {
-  fixPatch,
-  parseHunks,
-  hunksToPatch,
-  Hunk,
-  patchFile,
-} from "../../src/agents/tools/patch";
-import { applyPatch } from "diff";
-import * as fs from "fs";
-
-const mockToolService = {
-  getContext: () => ({ Events: null }),
-};
-const boundPatch = (patchFile as any).bind(mockToolService);
-
-describe("Patch Engine - Edge Case Regression Suite", () => {
-  // --- Test Case 1: Context Block Desynchronization (Ghost Line Bug) ---
-  describe("Error Type 1: Context Block Desynchronization", () => {
-    it("should reject context lines polluted by other hunks and find the true fallback anchor", () => {
-      const originalFileContent = `import React, { useState } from 'react';\n\nexport default function AuthPage() {\n  const [email, setEmail] = useState('');\n  const [password, setPassword] = useState('');\n  const [confirmPassword, setConfirmPassword] = useState('');\n  return <div>Welcome to Knowhow</div>;\n}`;
-
-      // This patch contains a "Ghost Line" inside the context block:
-      // "onChange={handlePasswordChange}" does not exist at this position in the original file
-      const corruptedPatch = `@@ -5,4 +5,4 @@\n   const [password, setPassword] = useState('');\n   const [confirmPassword, setConfirmPassword] = useState('');\n-  return <div>Welcome to Knowhow</div>;\n+  return <div>Welcome to Knowhow Engine</div>;\n      onChange={handlePasswordChange}`;
-
-      const fixedPatchOutput = fixPatch(originalFileContent, corruptedPatch);
-      expect(fixedPatchOutput).toBeDefined();
-      expect(fixedPatchOutput).not.toBe("");
-
-      // Verify that the patch can now be parsed and successfully applied via standard diff utilities
-      const finalApplication = applyPatch(
-        originalFileContent,
-        fixedPatchOutput
-      );
-      expect(finalApplication).not.toBe(false);
-      expect(finalApplication).toContain("Welcome to Knowhow Engine");
-      expect(finalApplication).not.toContain("onChange={handlePasswordChange}");
-    });
-  });
-
-  // --- Test Case 2: Greedy Line Collision / Duplicate Suffixes ---
-  describe("Error Type 2: Greedy Line Collision (Duplicate Suffixes)", () => {
-    it("should correctly isolate and anchor matching structures in files with repeating method boundaries", () => {
-      // Common signature parameters that repeat sequentially across multiple distinct blocks
-      const schemaFileContent = `export const includedTools = [\n  {\n    name: "astAppendNode",\n    required: ["filePath", "astPath", "newContent"]\n  },\n  {\n    name: "astEditNode",\n    required: ["filePath", "astPath", "newContent"]\n  }\n];`;
-
-      // Corrupted patch trying to update the SECOND method wrapper block ("astEditNode")
-      // but its context strings match both object items natively.
-      const ambiguousPatch = `@@ -6,4 +6,4 @@\n   {\n-    name: "astEditNode",\n+    name: "astEditNodeModified",\n     required: ["filePath", "astPath", "newContent"]\n   }`;
-
-      const fixedPatchOutput = fixPatch(schemaFileContent, ambiguousPatch);
-      const hunks = parseHunks(fixedPatchOutput);
-
-      // Verify that the fixing logic anchored correctly to the target block and didn't corrupt the first item
-      const finalApplication = applyPatch(schemaFileContent, fixedPatchOutput);
-      expect(finalApplication).not.toBe(false);
-      expect(finalApplication).toContain('"astAppendNode"');
-      expect(finalApplication).toContain('"astEditNodeModified"');
-    });
-  });
-
-  // --- Test Case 3: Multiline Hunk Structural Manipulation & Range Counts ---
-  describe("Error Type 3: Multiline Hunk Structural Manipulation", () => {
-    it("should recalculate valid hunk metadata ranges (+x,y) when code structural look blocks morph sizes", () => {
-      const originalSource = `function compute(data) {\n  const item = data.value;\n  if (item) {\n    return item;\n  }\n  return null;\n}`;
-
-      // Patch attempts a structural change (wrapping logic into a comprehensive nested structure)
-      // but the line counts inside the header definition are severely corrupted.
-      const brokenRangePatch = `@@ -3,3 +3,200 @@\n   if (item) {\n-    return item;\n+    try {\n+      return item.process();\n+    } catch (e) {\n+      return null;\n+    }\n   }`;
-
-      const fixedPatchOutput = fixPatch(originalSource, brokenRangePatch);
-      const parsedHunks = parseHunks(fixedPatchOutput);
-
-      expect(parsedHunks.length).toBeGreaterThan(0);
-      // Ensure the line counts have been normalized to reflect the correct sizing changes
-      expect(parsedHunks[0].newLineCount).toBe(8); // 2 context before + 5 inside try/catch + 1 context after
-
-      const finalApplication = applyPatch(originalSource, fixedPatchOutput);
-      expect(finalApplication).not.toBe(false);
-      expect(finalApplication).toContain("try {");
-    });
-  });
-
-  // --- Test Case 4: Duplicate Anchor Blocks / Loop Comment Ambiguity ---
-  describe("Error Type 4: Shared Comment / Anchor Block Ambiguity", () => {
-    it("should utilize deeper multi-line context scopes to avoid getting hijacked by identical comments or loops", () => {
-      const multiLoopSource = `// Process properties loop\nfor (const [key, value] of Object.entries(data)) {\n  console.log(key);\n}\n\n// Process properties loop\nfor (const [key, value] of Object.entries(dataToCompress)) {\n  this.compress(value);\n}`;
-
-      // Patch intends to target the SECOND loop structure, but relies on a generic loop comment as an anchor
-      const misplacedPatch = `@@ -6,3 +6,3 @@\n // Process properties loop\n-for (const [key, value] of Object.entries(dataToCompress)) {\n+for (const [key, value] of Object.entries(dataToCompress)).map(([key, value]) => {\n   this.compress(value);`;
-
-      const fixedPatchOutput = fixPatch(multiLoopSource, misplacedPatch);
-      const finalApplication = applyPatch(multiLoopSource, fixedPatchOutput);
-
-      expect(finalApplication).not.toBe(false);
-      // Ensure the first loop was preserved completely intact
-      expect(finalApplication).toContain("console.log(key);");
-      // Ensure the second loop was targeted accurately
-      expect(finalApplication).toContain("Object.entries(dataToCompress)).map");
-    });
-  });
-
-  // --- Test Case 5: Empty File Initialization Support ---
-  describe("Error Type 5: Empty and Baseline Structural Edge Cases", () => {
-    it("should successfully generate and validate headers when initializing changes on an empty source baseline file", () => {
-      const originalFileContent = "";
-      const creationPatch = `@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@\n+export type Option = {\n+  label: string;\n+  value: string;\n+}`;
-
-      const fixedPatchOutput = fixPatch(originalFileContent, creationPatch);
-      const finalApplication = applyPatch(
-        originalFileContent,
-        fixedPatchOutput
-      );
-
-      expect(finalApplication).not.toBe(false);
-      expect(finalApplication).toContain("export type Option");
-    });
-
-    it("should gracefully handle patches targeting an absolute trailing EOF with no trailing newline characters", () => {
-      const sourceNoNewline = `const host = process.env.HOST || "localhost";\nconst port = process.env.PORT || 4000;`;
-      const eofPatch = `@@ -2,2 +2,3 @@\n const port = process.env.PORT || 4000;\n+const httpsPort = Number(port) + 1;`;
-
-      const fixedPatchOutput = fixPatch(sourceNoNewline, eofPatch);
-      const finalApplication = applyPatch(sourceNoNewline, fixedPatchOutput);
-
-      expect(finalApplication).not.toBe(false);
-      expect(finalApplication).toContain("const httpsPort = Number(port) + 1;");
-    });
-  });
-
-  // --- Test Case 6: The Interrupted Context Splitting (Dangling Context Blocks) ---
-  describe("Error Type 6: Interrupted Context Splitting", () => {
-    it("should handle hunks where context chunks are broken by internal function changes without losing line tracking", () => {
-      const originalFileContent = `import { embeddings } from "@knowhow/knowhow";\nimport type { types } from "@knowhow/knowhow";\n\nexport class OrgEmbeddingService {\n  async embedSource(organizationId: string, source: types.EmbeddingSource): Promise<types.EmbeddingData[]> {\n    if (source.kind === "knowhow-file") {\n      const downloadedFiles = await Promise.all(\n        source.data.map(async (fileId) => {\n          const filePath = await this.downloadOrgFile(organizationId, fileId);\n          return { id: fileId, path: filePath };\n        })\n      );\n    }\n  }\n}`;
-
-      // This replicates the failure in OrgEmbedding.ts where context blocks are skipped or compressed mid-stream
-      const brokenSplitPatch = `@@ -4,11 +4,12 @@\n import { FilterType } from "../util/types";\n-import type { types } from "@knowhow/knowhow";\n+import { embeddings, EmbeddingSource, EmbeddingData } from "@knowhow/knowhow";\n \n   async embedSource(\n     organizationId: string,\n-    source: types.EmbeddingSource\n-  ): Promise<types.EmbeddingData[]> {\n+    source: EmbeddingSource\n+  ): Promise<EmbeddingData[]> {\n     if (source.kind === "knowhow-file") {`;
-
-      const fixedPatchOutput = fixPatch(originalFileContent, brokenSplitPatch);
-      expect(fixedPatchOutput).toBeDefined();
-      expect(fixedPatchOutput).not.toBe("");
-
-      const finalApplication = applyPatch(
-        originalFileContent,
-        fixedPatchOutput
-      );
-      expect(finalApplication).not.toBe(false);
-      expect(finalApplication).toContain("source: EmbeddingSource");
-    });
-  });
-
-  // --- Test Case 7: Complex Multi-Hunk Re-Ordering Offset Shifts ---
-  describe("Error Type 7: Multi-Hunk Re-Ordering Offset Shifts", () => {
-    it("should accurately compute subsequent hunk lines when an earlier hunk has altered the global row layout index", () => {
-      const componentContent = `import React, { useState } from 'react';\nimport { Button } from "@/components/ui/button";\n\nexport function AccountSwitcher() {\n  const [isOpen, setIsOpen] = useState(false);\n  const handleCreateOrg = () => {\n    const name = prompt("Enter name:");\n  };\n  return (\n    <Button onClick={handleCreateOrg}>Create</Button>\n  );\n}`;
-
-      // A single patch with MULTIPLE hunks where Hunk 1 introduces an offset drift
-      // that shifts the physical line target numbers for Hunk 2 down the file stream.
-      const multiHunkPatch = `@@ -1,4 +1,5 @@\n import React, { useState } from 'react';\n+import { useToast } from "@/hooks/use-toast";\n import { Button } from "@/components/ui/button";\n@@ -6,4 +7,6 @@\n   const handleCreateOrg = () => {\n+    const { toast } = useToast();\n     const name = prompt("Enter name:");\n+    toast({ title: "Success" });\n   };`;
-
-      const fixedPatchOutput = fixPatch(componentContent, multiHunkPatch);
-      expect(fixedPatchOutput).toBeDefined();
-
-      const finalApplication = applyPatch(componentContent, fixedPatchOutput);
-      expect(finalApplication).not.toBe(false);
-      expect(finalApplication).toContain("const { toast } = useToast();");
-    });
-  });
-
-  // --- Test Case 8: Subtraction Block Redundancy Over-Matching ---
-  describe("Error Type 8: Subtraction Block Redundancy Over-Matching", () => {
-    it("should isolate the exact segment to modify even when deletions match completely duplicate layout states elsewhere in the file", () => {
-      // Replicates the problem inside InputQueueManager.ts where identical sync logic definitions
-      // appear sequentially or closely together inside the class body definition.
-      const duplicatedLinesSource = `if (key?.name === "tab") {\n  setImmediate(() => {\n    this.currentLine = (this.rl as any).line ?? "";\n  });\n}\nif (!this.rl || this.stack.length === 0) return;\nthis.currentLine = (this.rl as any).line ?? "";`;
-
-      const redundantPatch = `@@ -6,3 +6,5 @@\n if (!this.rl || this.stack.length === 0) return;\n-this.currentLine = (this.rl as any).line ?? "";\n+if (key?.name !== "tab") {\n+  this.currentLine = (this.rl as any).line ?? "";\n+}`;
-
-      const fixedPatchOutput = fixPatch(duplicatedLinesSource, redundantPatch);
-      const finalApplication = applyPatch(
-        duplicatedLinesSource,
-        fixedPatchOutput
-      );
-
-      expect(finalApplication).not.toBe(false);
-      // Ensure the first assignment block wasn't touched or stripped out by accident
-      expect(finalApplication).toContain("setImmediate(() => {");
-      // Ensure the conditional wrapper applied cleanly on the second loop target block
-      expect(finalApplication).toContain('if (key?.name !== "tab") {');
-    });
-  });
-
-  // --- Test Case 9: Pure Insertion (No Deletions) Count Recalculation ---
-  describe("Error Type 9: Pure Insertion Hunk Reconstruction", () => {
-    it("should output a precise target header count when a hunk contains zero subtractions and only insertions", () => {
-      const baselineContent = `import { services } from "../services";\nimport { patchFile } from "./patch";\n\nexport async function run() {}`;
-
-      // A patch containing an insertion with a line count error in the header metadata
-      const pureInsertionPatch = `@@ -2,0 +3,50 @@\n import { patchFile } from "./patch";\n+import { lintFile } from "./lint";\n export async function run() {}`;
-
-      const fixedPatchOutput = fixPatch(baselineContent, pureInsertionPatch);
-      const parsedHunks = parseHunks(fixedPatchOutput);
-
-      expect(parsedHunks.length).toBeGreaterThan(0);
-
-      // Standard unified diff dictates that if original count is 0, the line reference
-      // should point to the line *before* the insertion point.
-      // Let's verify our engine didn't carry over the broken ",50" insertion metadata count.
-      expect(fixedPatchOutput).not.toContain("+3,50");
-
-      const finalApplication = applyPatch(baselineContent, fixedPatchOutput);
-      expect(finalApplication).not.toBe(false);
-      expect(finalApplication).toContain('import { lintFile } from "./lint";');
-    });
-  });
-
-  // --- Test Case 10: Pure Deletion (No Additions) Header Simplification ---
-  describe("Error Type 10: Pure Deletion Header Simplification", () => {
-    it("should simplify or format line counts cleanly when an entry block is stripped completely out of the source", () => {
-      const sourceWithUnusedImports = `import { services } from "../services";\nimport { unusedUtil } from "./utils";\n\nexport class Worker {}`;
-
-      // A patch that drops an import statement but provides broken target line count offsets
-      const pureDeletionPatch = `@@ -2,1 +2,0 @@\n-import { unusedUtil } from "./utils";`;
-
-      const fixedPatchOutput = fixPatch(
-        sourceWithUnusedImports,
-        pureDeletionPatch
-      );
-      const finalApplication = applyPatch(
-        sourceWithUnusedImports,
-        fixedPatchOutput
-      );
-
-      expect(finalApplication).not.toBe(false);
-      expect(finalApplication).not.toContain("unusedUtil");
-      expect(finalApplication).toContain("export class Worker");
-    });
-  });
-
-  // --- Test Case 11: Indentation Style Divergence ---
-  describe("Error Type 11: Indentation Style Divergence", () => {
-    it("should gracefully align and apply patches where the LLM altered leading spaces or tabs in unchanged context lines", () => {
-      const originalFileContent = `class Server {\n    constructor() {\n        this.port = 3000;\n    }\n}`;
-
-      // Notice the context lines have mixed 2-space indents instead of the original 4/8 space layout
-      const messyIndentPatch = `@@ -2,3 +2,3 @@\n   constructor() {\n-        this.port = 3000;\n+        this.port = 8080;\n   }`;
-
-      const fixedPatchOutput = fixPatch(originalFileContent, messyIndentPatch);
-      const finalApplication = applyPatch(
-        originalFileContent,
-        fixedPatchOutput
-      );
-
-      expect(finalApplication).not.toBe(false);
-      expect(finalApplication).toContain("this.port = 8080;");
-    });
-  });
-
-  // --- Test Case 12: Interleaved Twin-Block Collisions ---
-  describe("Error Type 12: Interleaved Twin-Block Collisions", () => {
-    it("should maintain perfect boundary tracking when multiple interleaved modifications are separated by single, repeating keywords", () => {
-      const complexTwinSource = `setup();\n// Section One\ninit();\n// Section Two\ninit();\ncleanup();`;
-
-      // Interleaved changes mutating both identical-looking method assignments across a shared keyword line
-      const twinHunkPatch = `@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@\n // Section One\n-init();\n+initPrimary();\n // Section Two\n-init();\n+initSecondary();`;
-
-      const fixedPatchOutput = fixPatch(complexTwinSource, twinHunkPatch);
-      const finalApplication = applyPatch(complexTwinSource, fixedPatchOutput);
-
-      expect(finalApplication).not.toBe(false);
-      expect(finalApplication).toContain("initPrimary();");
-      expect(finalApplication).toContain("initSecondary();");
-    });
-  });
-
-  // --- Test Case 13: Carriage Return CRLF Normalization ---
-  describe("Error Type 13: Carriage Return CRLF Normalization", () => {
-    it("should preserve original line ending styles without crashing when running patches on strict CRLF text files", () => {
-      const winFile = "const a = 1;\r\nconst b = 2;\r\nconst c = 3;\r\n";
-      const unixPatch =
-        "@@ -2,2 +2,2 @@\n const b = 2;\n-const c = 3;\n+const c = 4;\n";
-
-      const fixedPatchOutput = fixPatch(winFile, unixPatch);
-      const finalApplication = applyPatch(winFile, fixedPatchOutput);
-
-      expect(finalApplication).not.toBe(false);
-      expect(finalApplication).toContain("const c = 4;");
-    });
-  });
-
-  // --- Test Case 14: Insertion-Before-Anchor Reordering (real session bug) ---
-  // Reproduces a bug observed while editing SnapshotManager.ts: adding new lines
-  // ABOVE an existing `return snapshot;` (using that return as trailing context)
-  // anchored on the PRECEDING context line and inserted the new lines AFTER the
-  // return instead of before it. The added log line became unreachable dead code
-  // and, in a follow-up edit, the `return` was dropped entirely — a silent
-  // control-flow / correctness change. Hunk: insert N lines before a kept line.
-  describe("Error Type 14: Insertion-Before-Anchor Reordering", () => {
-    it("should insert new lines BEFORE the trailing-context line, not after it", () => {
-      const originalFileContent = `    if (rootfsStillExists) {
-        return snapshot;
-      }
-      this.logger.info("missing");
-`;
-      // Add a comment + log + KEEP the existing `return snapshot;` as trailing context.
-      const insertBeforeReturnPatch = `@@ -1,3 +1,6 @@
-       if (rootfsStillExists) {
-+        // reusing local overlay
-+        this.logger.info("reusing");
-         return snapshot;
-       }
-`;
-
-      const fixedPatchOutput = fixPatch(
-        originalFileContent,
-        insertBeforeReturnPatch
-      );
-      const finalApplication = applyPatch(
-        originalFileContent,
-        fixedPatchOutput
-      );
-
-      expect(finalApplication).not.toBe(false);
-      const out = finalApplication as string;
-      // The kept `return snapshot;` must still be present exactly once.
-      expect(out).toContain("return snapshot;");
-      // The new log must appear BEFORE the return (otherwise it is unreachable).
-      const idxLog = out.indexOf('this.logger.info("reusing")');
-      const idxReturn = out.indexOf("return snapshot;");
-      expect(idxLog).toBeGreaterThanOrEqual(0);
-      expect(idxReturn).toBeGreaterThanOrEqual(0);
-      expect(idxLog).toBeLessThan(idxReturn);
-    });
-  });
-
-  // --- Test Case 15: Append-After-Function Scope Bleed (real session bug) ---
-  // Reproduces a bug observed while editing test-cross-machine-restore.ts: appending
-  // a brand-new top-level function right after an existing function's closing brace
-  // (using the function body + closing `}` as leading context) caused the new
-  // function to be injected INSIDE the existing function's body, between its
-  // signature and its `return`, corrupting both functions. The anchor latched onto
-  // the wrong `}` (a shared/duplicate brace earlier in the file).
-  describe("Error Type 15: Append-After-Function Scope Bleed", () => {
-    it("should append a new function AFTER the anchor function's closing brace, leaving it intact", () => {
-      const originalFileContent = `function getArg(flag) {
-  return idx;
-}
-function hasFlag(flag) {
-  return args.includes(flag);
-}
-const x = 1;
-`;
-      // Anchor on hasFlag's full body + closing brace, then append a new function.
-      const appendFunctionPatch = `@@ -4,3 +4,8 @@
- function hasFlag(flag) {
-   return args.includes(flag);
- }
-+
-+function helper(lines) {
-+  return lines.some((l) => true);
-+}
-`;
-
-      const fixedPatchOutput = fixPatch(
-        originalFileContent,
-        appendFunctionPatch
-      );
-      const finalApplication = applyPatch(
-        originalFileContent,
-        fixedPatchOutput
-      );
-
-      expect(finalApplication).not.toBe(false);
-      const out = finalApplication as string;
-      // The new function must exist.
-      expect(out).toContain("function helper(lines)");
-      // CRITICAL: hasFlag must remain a contiguous, intact function — the new
-      // function must NOT be injected between its signature and its return.
-      expect(out).toMatch(
-        /function hasFlag\(flag\) \{\s*\n\s*return args\.includes\(flag\);\s*\n\}/
-      );
-      // helper must come AFTER hasFlag, not before / inside it.
-      const idxHasFlag = out.indexOf("function hasFlag");
-      const idxHelper = out.indexOf("function helper");
-      expect(idxHelper).toBeGreaterThan(idxHasFlag);
-    });
-  });
-
-  // --- Test Case 16: Block-Replace-And-Append (try-block placement + new methods) ---
-  // Reproduces a bug where a patch that:
-  //   (a) removes a large inline body from inside a try{} block and replaces it with
-  //       a single call, AND
-  //   (b) appends brand-new methods after the method's closing brace
-  // was auto-corrected incorrectly:
-  //   - The replacement call landed inside the `catch (error) {` block instead of
-  //     inside the `try {` block where the removed code lived.
-  //   - The appended new methods were silently dropped entirely.
-  describe("Error Type 16: Block-Replace-And-Append (try-block placement + append)", () => {
-    it("should place the replacement call inside the try block (before catch) and preserve appended new methods", () => {
-      // Source mirrors the original onSessionStop method before refactoring.
-      const originalFileContent = [
-        "  /**",
-        "   * Finalize billing when a session stops",
-        "   */",
-        "  async onSessionStop(sessionKey: string): Promise<void> {",
-        "    try {",
-        "      const event = await prisma.cloudBillingEvent.findUnique({",
-        "        where: { sessionKey },",
-        "      });",
-        "",
-        "      if (!event) {",
-        "        this.logger.warn(",
-        "          `[CloudBilling] No billing event found for session: ${sessionKey}`",
-        "        );",
-        "        return;",
-        "      }",
-        "",
-        "      if (event.status !== \"running\") {",
-        "        this.logger.info(",
-        "          `[CloudBilling] Session ${sessionKey} already billed (status: ${event.status})`",
-        "        );",
-        "        return;",
-        "      }",
-        "",
-        "      const stoppedAt = new Date();",
-        "      const uptimeMs = stoppedAt.getTime() - event.startedAt.getTime();",
-        "      const uptimeMinutes = uptimeMs / 1000 / 60;",
-        "      const ratePerMinute = parseSandboxSpecRate(event.serverSpec) ?? RATE;",
-        "      const costUsd = uptimeMinutes * ratePerMinute;",
-        "",
-        "      await prisma.cloudBillingEvent.update({",
-        "        where: { sessionKey },",
-        "        data: {",
-        "          stoppedAt,",
-        "          uptimeMinutes,",
-        "          costUsd,",
-        "          status: \"billed\",",
-        "          billedAt: new Date(),",
-        "        },",
-        "      });",
-        "",
-        "      const result = await this.usageService.deductCredits(",
-        "        event.orgId,",
-        "        costUsd,",
-        "        \"cloud\",",
-        "        undefined,",
-        "        event.orgUserId ?? undefined",
-        "      );",
-        "",
-        "      await this.usageService.recordUsage(",
-        "        event.orgId,",
-        "        \"cloud\",",
-        "        event.serverSpec,",
-        "        costUsd,",
-        "        event.orgUserId ?? undefined,",
-        "        \"cloud\",",
-        "        result.fundedFrom",
-        "      );",
-        "",
-        "      this.logger.info(",
-        "        `[CloudBilling] Session ${sessionKey} billed`",
-        "      );",
-        "    } catch (error) {",
-        "      this.logger.error(",
-        "        `[CloudBilling] Failed to bill session ${sessionKey}:`,",
-        "        error",
-        "      );",
-        "    }",
-        "  }",
-      ].join("\n");
-
-      // Patch: remove the inline finalize body, replace with single call,
-      // AND append two new methods after the closing brace.
-      const refactorPatch = [
-        "@@ -19,43 +19,7 @@",
-        "",
-        "      if (event.status !== \"running\") {",
-        "        this.logger.info(",
-        "          `[CloudBilling] Session ${sessionKey} already billed (status: ${event.status})`",
-        "        );",
-        "        return;",
-        "      }",
-        "",
-        "-      const stoppedAt = new Date();",
-        "-      const uptimeMs = stoppedAt.getTime() - event.startedAt.getTime();",
-        "-      const uptimeMinutes = uptimeMs / 1000 / 60;",
-        "-      const ratePerMinute = parseSandboxSpecRate(event.serverSpec) ?? RATE;",
-        "-      const costUsd = uptimeMinutes * ratePerMinute;",
-        "-",
-        "-      await prisma.cloudBillingEvent.update({",
-        "-        where: { sessionKey },",
-        "-        data: {",
-        "-          stoppedAt,",
-        "-          uptimeMinutes,",
-        "-          costUsd,",
-        "-          status: \"billed\",",
-        "-          billedAt: new Date(),",
-        "-        },",
-        "-      });",
-        "-",
-        "-      const result = await this.usageService.deductCredits(",
-        "-        event.orgId,",
-        "-        costUsd,",
-        "-        \"cloud\",",
-        "-        undefined,",
-        "-        event.orgUserId ?? undefined",
-        "-      );",
-        "-",
-        "-      await this.usageService.recordUsage(",
-        "-        event.orgId,",
-        "-        \"cloud\",",
-        "-        event.serverSpec,",
-        "-        costUsd,",
-        "-        event.orgUserId ?? undefined,",
-        "-        \"cloud\",",
-        "-        result.fundedFrom",
-        "-      );",
-        "-",
-        "-      this.logger.info(",
-        "-        `[CloudBilling] Session ${sessionKey} billed`",
-        "-      );",
-        "+      await this._finalizeEvent(event);",
-        "     } catch (error) {",
-        "       this.logger.error(",
-        "         `[CloudBilling] Failed to bill session ${sessionKey}:`,",
-        "@@ -62,3 +26,19 @@",
-        "     }",
-        "   }",
-        "+",
-        "+  async onSessionStopByResource(",
-        "+    resourceType: string,",
-        "+    resourceId: string",
-        "+  ): Promise<void> {",
-        "+    try {",
-        "+      this.logger.info(`[CloudBilling] stop by resource ${resourceType}/${resourceId}`);",
-        "+    } catch (error) {",
-        "+      this.logger.error(`[CloudBilling] Failed:`, error);",
-        "+    }",
-        "+  }",
-        "+",
-        "+  private async _finalizeEvent(event: { id: string; sessionKey: string; status: string; startedAt: Date; serverSpec: string; orgId: string; orgUserId: string | null; }): Promise<void> {",
-        "+    this.logger.info(`[CloudBilling] finalizing ${event.sessionKey}`);",
-        "+  }",
-      ].join("\n");
-
-      const fixedPatchOutput = fixPatch(originalFileContent, refactorPatch);
-      const finalApplication = applyPatch(originalFileContent, fixedPatchOutput);
-
-      expect(finalApplication).not.toBe(false);
-      const out = finalApplication as string;
-
-      // (1) The replacement call must appear BEFORE the catch block (inside the try block).
-      const idxFinalizeCall = out.indexOf("await this._finalizeEvent(event);");
-      const idxCatch = out.indexOf("} catch (error) {");
-      expect(idxFinalizeCall).toBeGreaterThanOrEqual(0);
-      expect(idxCatch).toBeGreaterThanOrEqual(0);
-      expect(idxFinalizeCall).toBeLessThan(idxCatch);
-
-      // (2) The catch block should only contain the logger.error, NOT _finalizeEvent.
-      const catchBlock = out.slice(idxCatch);
-      expect(catchBlock).not.toContain("await this._finalizeEvent(event);");
-
-      // (3) The appended new methods must be present in the output.
-      expect(out).toContain("async onSessionStopByResource(");
-      expect(out).toContain("private async _finalizeEvent(");
-    });
-  });
-});
-
-/**
- * Regression for the "wrong location" patch mangling bug observed while patching
- * `packages/backend/src/services/SandboxHostManager.ts`.
- *
- * WHAT HAPPENED:
- * A patch targeting `provisionHost()` (line ~563) aimed to replace:
- *   `const host = await this.createHost({ ..., notes: 'auto-provisioned' })`
- * with a direct `prisma.sandboxHost.create({ ..., status: 'provisioning' })` call.
- *
- * The patch had these context lines in its hunk:
- *   `    // Register in the DB as stopped (it will self-register as online once booted)`
- *   `    const host = await this.createHost({`
- *
- * The file also contained `markHostOffline()` (line ~173) which had a similar
- * `prisma.sandboxHost.update({ data: { status: 'stopped', baseUrl: null, ... } })` block,
- * and `createHost()` (line ~330) with `status: 'stopped'` inside its create call.
- *
- * The patch engine anchored on the FIRST occurrence of matching context, which was
- * inside `markHostOffline`. The hunk was then applied there, merging `createHost`
- * call arguments INTO `markHostOffline`'s update body — producing a file where
- * `markHostOffline` contained `instanceId`, `instanceType`, `notes`, etc., and
- * `provisionHost` was left with the old code. The output was syntactically broken.
- *
- * CORRECT BEHAVIOR:
- * The patch must be applied only at the location matching the full context
- * (including the unique comment line), NOT at the first partial match.
- * Earlier methods must remain completely unchanged.
- */
-describe("patchFile wrong-location regression — ambiguous status lines across methods", () => {
-  const testFile = "/tmp/patch-wrong-location-sandbox-host.ts";
-
-  // Mirrors the relevant structure of SandboxHostManager.ts
-  const original = `  /**
-   * Mark host as offline — called on shutdown.
-   */
-  async markHostOffline(instanceId: string): Promise<void> {
-    const host = await prisma.sandboxHost.findUnique({ where: { instanceId } });
-    if (!host) return;
-
-    await prisma.sandboxHost.update({
-      where: { id: host.id },
-      data: {
-        status: 'stopped',
-        baseUrl: null,
-        stoppedAt: new Date(),
-      },
-    });
-
-    this.logger.info(\`Host \${host.id} marked offline\`);
-  }
-
-  /**
-   * Create a new sandbox host record (for provisioning).
-   */
-  async createHost(data: {
-    instanceId: string;
-    instanceType?: string;
-    notes?: string;
-  }): Promise<SandboxHost> {
-    return prisma.sandboxHost.create({
-      data: {
-        instanceId: data.instanceId,
-        instanceType: data.instanceType ?? 'unknown',
-        notes: data.notes ?? null,
-        status: 'stopped',
-      },
-    });
-  }
-
-  /**
-   * Provision a brand-new EC2 instance and register it in the DB.
-   */
-  async provisionHost(instanceType?: string): Promise<SandboxHost> {
-    const instanceId = 'i-0abc123';
-    const resolvedInstanceType = instanceType ?? 'c8i.xlarge';
-
-    // Register in the DB as stopped (it will self-register as online once booted)
-    const host = await this.createHost({
-      instanceId,
-      instanceType: resolvedInstanceType,
-      region: 'us-east-1',
-      maxVms: 14,
-      notes: 'auto-provisioned',
-    });
-
-    return host;
-  }
-`;
-
-  beforeEach(() => {
-    fs.writeFileSync(testFile, original);
-  });
-
-  it("should replace createHost call in provisionHost only, leaving markHostOffline and createHost intact", async () => {
-    // This patch reproduces the EXACT real-world mangle from commit 5d572789a.
-    //
-    // The patchFile tool received a patch with a correct small hunk but the auto-correction
-    // anchored the hunk at line 177 (inside markHostOffline's `data: {` block) instead of
-    // line ~46 (inside provisionHost). The result was the removal lines:
-    //   `    const host = await this.createHost({`
-    //   `      instanceId,`  etc.
-    // got INSERTED into the middle of markHostOffline's prisma update data block, producing:
-    //   data: {
-    //     const host = await this.createHost({   ← INJECTED WRONG LOCATION
-    //       status: 'provisioning',
-    //   ...
-    // and then 390 lines got deleted because the hunk size was wrong.
-    //
-    // The patch the tool generated had @@ -177,390 +177,10 @@ as its header after auto-correction,
-    // anchoring on `      data: {` inside markHostOffline instead of the comment context
-    // `    // Register in the DB as stopped` which is unique to provisionHost.
-    //
-    // CORRECT behavior: the patch engine must use the unique comment context line to anchor
-    // the hunk in provisionHost, not the first occurrence of similar lines.
-    const patch = `@@ -999,11 +999,13 @@
-     // Register in the DB as stopped (it will self-register as online once booted)
--    const host = await this.createHost({
--      instanceId,
--      instanceType: resolvedInstanceType,
--      region: 'us-east-1',
--      maxVms: 14,
--      notes: 'auto-provisioned',
--    });
-+    // Register as 'provisioning' — distinct from 'stopped' (intentionally shut down).
-+    const host = await prisma.sandboxHost.create({
-+      data: {
-+        instanceId,
-+        instanceType: resolvedInstanceType,
-+        status: 'provisioning',
-+        notes: 'auto-provisioned',
-+      },
-+    });
- 
-     return host;
-   }
-`;
-
-    const result = await boundPatch(testFile, patch);
-    console.log("WRONG-LOCATION REGRESSION RESULT:\n", result);
-    expect(result).not.toContain("❌ Patch failed");
-
-    const updated = fs.readFileSync(testFile, "utf8");
-    console.log("UPDATED FILE:\n", updated);
-
-    // 1. 'provisioning' must appear in the output (the patch was applied)
-    expect(updated).toContain("status: 'provisioning'");
-
-    // 2. CRITICAL: markHostOffline must still contain status: 'stopped', baseUrl: null,
-    //    and stoppedAt — these would be wiped out if the patch was applied to the wrong location
-    const markOfflineIdx = updated.indexOf("markHostOffline");
-    expect(markOfflineIdx).toBeGreaterThan(-1);
-
-    const baseUrlIdx = updated.indexOf("baseUrl: null");
-    expect(baseUrlIdx).toBeGreaterThan(-1);
-    // baseUrl: null must be inside markHostOffline (after it in the file)
-    expect(baseUrlIdx).toBeGreaterThan(markOfflineIdx);
-
-    const stoppedAtIdx = updated.indexOf("stoppedAt: new Date()");
-    expect(stoppedAtIdx).toBeGreaterThan(-1);
-    expect(stoppedAtIdx).toBeGreaterThan(markOfflineIdx);
-
-    expect(updated).toContain("marked offline");
-
-    // 3. 'provisioning' must appear AFTER markHostOffline and createHost (i.e. inside provisionHost)
-    const createHostMethodIdx = updated.indexOf("async createHost(");
-    const provisionHostIdx = updated.indexOf("async provisionHost(");
-    const provisioningIdx = updated.indexOf("status: 'provisioning'");
-
-    expect(createHostMethodIdx).toBeGreaterThan(-1);
-    expect(provisionHostIdx).toBeGreaterThan(-1);
-    expect(provisioningIdx).toBeGreaterThan(provisionHostIdx);
-
-    // 4. The comment explaining 'provisioning' must be present (was in the patch additions)
-    expect(updated).toContain("distinct from 'stopped'");
-
-    // 5. createHost method must still have its original status: 'stopped' body
-    const createHostBodyStart = updated.indexOf("async createHost(");
-    const createHostBodyEnd = updated.indexOf("async provisionHost(");
-    const createHostBody = updated.slice(createHostBodyStart, createHostBodyEnd);
-    expect(createHostBody).toContain("status: 'stopped'");
-    expect(createHostBody).toContain("data.instanceType ?? 'unknown'");
-  });
-});