@triclaps/cli 0.0.3 → 0.0.5

This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
Files changed (47) hide show
  1. package/adapters/hermes_claps_adapter.py +697 -0
  2. package/index.js +14045 -6391
  3. package/package.json +2 -2
  4. package/skills/assignment-kickoff-orchestration/SKILL.md +0 -53
  5. package/skills/assignment-kickoff-orchestration/agents/openai.yaml +0 -4
  6. package/skills/assignment-kickoff-orchestration/references/kickoff-checklist.md +0 -23
  7. package/skills/chat-task-delivery/SKILL.md +0 -33
  8. package/skills/chat-task-delivery/agents/openai.yaml +0 -4
  9. package/skills/claps-cli/SKILL.md +0 -203
  10. package/skills/claps-cli/agents/openai.yaml +0 -4
  11. package/skills/claps-cli/references/capabilities.md +0 -96
  12. package/skills/execution-context-recovery/SKILL.md +0 -51
  13. package/skills/execution-context-recovery/agents/openai.yaml +0 -4
  14. package/skills/git-delivery/SKILL.md +0 -41
  15. package/skills/git-delivery/agents/openai.yaml +0 -4
  16. package/skills/manifest.json +0 -324
  17. package/skills/merge-closeout/SKILL.md +0 -46
  18. package/skills/merge-closeout/agents/openai.yaml +0 -4
  19. package/skills/planning-baseline/SKILL.md +0 -43
  20. package/skills/planning-baseline/agents/openai.yaml +0 -4
  21. package/skills/planning-baseline/references/state-examples.md +0 -75
  22. package/skills/planning-session-convergence/SKILL.md +0 -50
  23. package/skills/planning-session-convergence/agents/openai.yaml +0 -4
  24. package/skills/preview-gateway/SKILL.md +0 -49
  25. package/skills/preview-gateway/agents/openai.yaml +0 -4
  26. package/skills/project-admin/SKILL.md +0 -44
  27. package/skills/project-admin/agents/openai.yaml +0 -4
  28. package/skills/repo-binding-closure/SKILL.md +0 -54
  29. package/skills/repo-binding-closure/agents/openai.yaml +0 -4
  30. package/skills/repo-binding-closure/references/execution-lane-checklist.md +0 -27
  31. package/skills/review-handoff/SKILL.md +0 -40
  32. package/skills/review-handoff/agents/openai.yaml +0 -4
  33. package/skills/roadmap.json +0 -127
  34. package/skills/task-admin/SKILL.md +0 -59
  35. package/skills/task-admin/agents/openai.yaml +0 -4
  36. package/skills/task-contract-draft/SKILL.md +0 -80
  37. package/skills/task-contract-draft/agents/openai.yaml +0 -4
  38. package/skills/task-detail-lookup/SKILL.md +0 -51
  39. package/skills/task-detail-lookup/agents/openai.yaml +0 -4
  40. package/skills/task-pool-triage/SKILL.md +0 -56
  41. package/skills/task-pool-triage/agents/openai.yaml +0 -4
  42. package/skills/task-stage-summary-backfill/SKILL.md +0 -75
  43. package/skills/task-stage-summary-backfill/agents/openai.yaml +0 -4
  44. package/skills/user-story-delivery/SKILL.md +0 -76
  45. package/skills/user-story-delivery/agents/openai.yaml +0 -4
  46. package/skills/workspace-bootstrap/SKILL.md +0 -41
  47. package/skills/workspace-bootstrap/agents/openai.yaml +0 -4
@@ -1,76 +0,0 @@
1
- ---
2
- name: user-story-delivery
3
- description: >
4
- Use this skill when chat requests should be reframed into a confirmed user
5
- story, broken into tracked work, implemented in a repo workspace, and
6
- delivered with review evidence.
7
- ---
8
-
9
- # user-story-delivery
10
-
11
- Use this flow when chat is the primary surface and the request should become tracked delivery work in CLAPS.
12
-
13
- ## Recommended flow
14
-
15
- 1. User story creation
16
- Confirm the target end-user experience before talking about implementation.
17
- - Capture the user narrative, desired experience, validation plan, acceptance criteria, edge cases, and explicit out-of-scope boundaries.
18
- - If repo execution is likely, also confirm what evidence should exist at delivery time: docs, screenshots, review notes, commits, preview URLs, or QA output.
19
- - If the story is still fuzzy, ask the smallest set of decision-driving questions instead of guessing.
20
-
21
- 2. Task breakdown
22
- Turn the confirmed story into tracked execution work.
23
- - Move the task workflow from `story_confirmation` into `task_breakdown` only after the story is clear enough to execute.
24
- - Write a concrete plan that covers docs updates, task shaping, data flow, interaction/layout thinking, implementation, self-check, and delivery evidence.
25
- - Call out assumptions, dependencies, and anything that could block repo execution or review.
26
- - Once the story is already confirmed and the workflow is in `task_breakdown` or `execution`, do not restart the story-creation loop unless the brief is contradictory or materially incomplete.
27
-
28
- 3. Execution
29
- Implement inside the prepared workspace.
30
- - Create the supporting docs and artifacts needed for later review, not just code changes.
31
- - Keep progress visible with task updates instead of waiting until the very end.
32
- - If repo binding, execution context, preview access, or runtime setup is missing, surface that blocker explicitly.
33
-
34
- 4. Self-check
35
- Before delivery, verify the work against both the acceptance criteria and the intended end-user experience.
36
- - Prefer concrete evidence over generic claims.
37
- - Re-read the original user story and confirm that the shipped result still matches it.
38
- - If the story drifted during implementation, update the task workflow and explain why.
39
-
40
- 5. Review gates
41
- Run or prepare evidence for gstack review gates when available:
42
- - `plan-eng-review`
43
- - `plan-design-review`
44
- - `design-consultation`
45
- - `design-review`
46
- - `review`
47
- - `qa`
48
- - `document-release`
49
-
50
- Default gate-to-skill mapping once implementation is ready:
51
- - `eng_review` -> `review`
52
- - `design_review` -> `design-review`
53
- - `qa` -> `qa`
54
-
55
- Before final delivery submission, proactively run the pending mapped review gates as a self-check and fix any in-scope findings before handing off.
56
-
57
- 6. Delivery
58
- Hand off with a concise summary of what changed, how the end-user experience was validated, and any remaining risks or follow-up items.
59
-
60
- ## Definition of done
61
-
62
- Treat the flow as complete only when all of the following are true:
63
-
64
- - the user story is explicit enough that another agent or reviewer could restate it without guessing
65
- - the workflow phase reflects reality instead of staying stuck in `story_confirmation`
66
- - implementation artifacts exist in the repo or task record
67
- - review evidence exists for the relevant eng, QA, and design gates
68
- - the final handoff says what changed, how it was validated, and what still needs human review
69
-
70
- ## Common failure modes
71
-
72
- - Jumping straight into coding before the user story is clear enough to validate
73
- - Reopening story confirmation after the user already confirmed scope, burning the execution window on work that is no longer the bottleneck
74
- - Treating a task title as a complete story even though desired experience and boundaries were never confirmed
75
- - Shipping code without updating workflow state, review gates, or delivery evidence
76
- - Claiming “done” with no proof that the user-facing experience actually improved
@@ -1,4 +0,0 @@
1
- interface:
2
- display_name: "user-story-delivery"
3
- short_description: "Confirm a user story, then turn it into tracked CLAPS delivery"
4
- default_prompt: "Use user-story-delivery to confirm the desired experience, break the work down, execute it, self-check it, and hand off with evidence."
@@ -1,41 +0,0 @@
1
- ---
2
- name: workspace-bootstrap
3
- description: >
4
- Use this skill when CLAPS work needs a repo-backed workspace prepared before
5
- execution, including clone, worktree, branch naming, root-path handling, and
6
- repo binding validation.
7
- ---
8
-
9
- # workspace-bootstrap
10
-
11
- Use this skill when execution needs a real workspace, not just a prompt.
12
-
13
- ## Goals
14
-
15
- - Validate that repo binding details are present before starting runtime execution.
16
- - Prepare a clean worktree and branch without corrupting the main checkout.
17
- - Surface missing repo metadata or git auth as explicit blockers.
18
-
19
- ## Flow
20
-
21
- 1. Confirm repo binding
22
- Make sure the task or project includes repo URL, default branch, repo name, and any monorepo root path.
23
-
24
- 2. Build the workspace path
25
- Use the stable workspace root plus repo name and task slug so repeated runs land in predictable paths.
26
-
27
- 3. Prepare the base clone
28
- Clone the repo when the base checkout does not exist yet. Reuse it when it is already present.
29
-
30
- 4. Create the execution branch and worktree
31
- Create the branch from the configured default branch, then attach a dedicated worktree for the task instead of mutating the base clone.
32
-
33
- 5. Hand off execution context
34
- Pass the prepared worktree path, branch name, and repo context into the runtime invocation and later delivery steps.
35
-
36
- ## Guidance
37
-
38
- - Treat missing repo binding as a blocker worth reporting immediately.
39
- - Prefer deterministic branch and worktree naming over ad hoc paths.
40
- - Keep the base clone stable; execution should happen inside the task worktree.
41
- - If the workspace already exists, reuse or repair it instead of recloning blindly.
@@ -1,4 +0,0 @@
1
- interface:
2
- display_name: "workspace-bootstrap"
3
- short_description: "Prepare clone, worktree, branch, and repo context before execution"
4
- default_prompt: "Use workspace-bootstrap when CLAPS delivery needs repo binding validation plus deterministic clone, worktree, and branch preparation."