@totaland/create-starter-kit 1.0.0 → 2.0.1

package/templates/frontend/.github/prompts/create-technical-spike.prompt.md

@@ -0,0 +1,230 @@
+---
+description: 'Create time-boxed technical spike documents for researching and resolving critical development decisions before implementation.'
+tools: ['runCommands', 'runTasks', 'edit', 'search', 'extensions', 'usages', 'vscodeAPI', 'think', 'problems', 'changes', 'testFailure', 'openSimpleBrowser', 'fetch', 'githubRepo', 'todos', 'Microsoft Docs', 'search']
+---
+
+# Create Technical Spike Document
+
+Create time-boxed technical spike documents for researching critical questions that must be answered before development can proceed. Each spike focuses on a specific technical decision with clear deliverables and timelines.
+
+## Document Structure
+
+Create individual files in `${input:FolderPath|docs/spikes}` directory. Name each file using the pattern: `[category]-[short-description]-spike.md` (e.g., `api-copilot-integration-spike.md`, `performance-realtime-audio-spike.md`).
+
+```md
+---
+title: "${input:SpikeTitle}"
+category: "${input:Category|Technical}"
+status: "🔴 Not Started"
+priority: "${input:Priority|High}"
+timebox: "${input:Timebox|1 week}"
+created: [YYYY-MM-DD]
+updated: [YYYY-MM-DD]
+owner: "${input:Owner}"
+tags: ["technical-spike", "${input:Category|technical}", "research"]
+---
+
+# ${input:SpikeTitle}
+
+## Summary
+
+**Spike Objective:** [Clear, specific question or decision that needs resolution]
+
+**Why This Matters:** [Impact on development/architecture decisions]
+
+**Timebox:** [How much time allocated to this spike]
+
+**Decision Deadline:** [When this must be resolved to avoid blocking development]
+
+## Research Question(s)
+
+**Primary Question:** [Main technical question that needs answering]
+
+**Secondary Questions:**
+
+- [Related question 1]
+- [Related question 2]
+- [Related question 3]
+
+## Investigation Plan
+
+### Research Tasks
+
+- [ ] [Specific research task 1]
+- [ ] [Specific research task 2]
+- [ ] [Specific research task 3]
+- [ ] [Create proof of concept/prototype]
+- [ ] [Document findings and recommendations]
+
+### Success Criteria
+
+**This spike is complete when:**
+
+- [ ] [Specific criteria 1]
+- [ ] [Specific criteria 2]
+- [ ] [Clear recommendation documented]
+- [ ] [Proof of concept completed (if applicable)]
+
+## Technical Context
+
+**Related Components:** [List system components affected by this decision]
+
+**Dependencies:** [What other spikes or decisions depend on resolving this]
+
+**Constraints:** [Known limitations or requirements that affect the solution]
+
+## Research Findings
+
+### Investigation Results
+
+[Document research findings, test results, and evidence gathered]
+
+### Prototype/Testing Notes
+
+[Results from any prototypes, spikes, or technical experiments]
+
+### External Resources
+
+- [Link to relevant documentation]
+- [Link to API references]
+- [Link to community discussions]
+- [Link to examples/tutorials]
+
+## Decision
+
+### Recommendation
+
+[Clear recommendation based on research findings]
+
+### Rationale
+
+[Why this approach was chosen over alternatives]
+
+### Implementation Notes
+
+[Key considerations for implementation]
+
+### Follow-up Actions
+
+- [ ] [Action item 1]
+- [ ] [Action item 2]
+- [ ] [Update architecture documents]
+- [ ] [Create implementation tasks]
+
+## Status History
+
+| Date   | Status         | Notes                      |
+| ------ | -------------- | -------------------------- |
+| [Date] | 🔴 Not Started | Spike created and scoped   |
+| [Date] | 🟡 In Progress | Research commenced         |
+| [Date] | 🟢 Complete    | [Resolution summary]       |
+
+---
+
+_Last updated: [Date] by [Name]_
+```
+
+## Categories for Technical Spikes
+
+### API Integration
+
+- Third-party API capabilities and limitations
+- Integration patterns and authentication
+- Rate limits and performance characteristics
+
+### Architecture & Design
+
+- System architecture decisions
+- Design pattern applicability
+- Component interaction models
+
+### Performance & Scalability
+
+- Performance requirements and constraints
+- Scalability bottlenecks and solutions
+- Resource utilization patterns
+
+### Platform & Infrastructure
+
+- Platform capabilities and limitations
+- Infrastructure requirements
+- Deployment and hosting considerations
+
+### Security & Compliance
+
+- Security requirements and implementations
+- Compliance constraints
+- Authentication and authorization approaches
+
+### User Experience
+
+- User interaction patterns
+- Accessibility requirements
+- Interface design decisions
+
+## File Naming Conventions
+
+Use descriptive, kebab-case names that indicate the category and specific unknown:
+
+**API/Integration Examples:**
+
+- `api-copilot-chat-integration-spike.md`
+- `api-azure-speech-realtime-spike.md`
+- `api-vscode-extension-capabilities-spike.md`
+
+**Performance Examples:**
+
+- `performance-audio-processing-latency-spike.md`
+- `performance-extension-host-limitations-spike.md`
+- `performance-webrtc-reliability-spike.md`
+
+**Architecture Examples:**
+
+- `architecture-voice-pipeline-design-spike.md`
+- `architecture-state-management-spike.md`
+- `architecture-error-handling-strategy-spike.md`
+
+## Best Practices for AI Agents
+
+1. **One Question Per Spike:** Each document focuses on a single technical decision or research question
+
+2. **Time-Boxed Research:** Define specific time limits and deliverables for each spike
+
+3. **Evidence-Based Decisions:** Require concrete evidence (tests, prototypes, documentation) before marking as complete
+
+4. **Clear Recommendations:** Document specific recommendations and rationale for implementation
+
+5. **Dependency Tracking:** Identify how spikes relate to each other and impact project decisions
+
+6. **Outcome-Focused:** Every spike must result in an actionable decision or recommendation
+
+## Research Strategy
+
+### Phase 1: Information Gathering
+
+1. **Search existing documentation** using search/fetch tools
+2. **Analyze codebase** for existing patterns and constraints
+3. **Research external resources** (APIs, libraries, examples)
+
+### Phase 2: Validation & Testing
+
+1. **Create focused prototypes** to test specific hypotheses
+2. **Run targeted experiments** to validate assumptions
+3. **Document test results** with supporting evidence
+
+### Phase 3: Decision & Documentation
+
+1. **Synthesize findings** into clear recommendations
+2. **Document implementation guidance** for development team
+3. **Create follow-up tasks** for implementation
+
+## Tools Usage
+
+- **search/searchResults:** Research existing solutions and documentation
+- **fetch/githubRepo:** Analyze external APIs, libraries, and examples
+- **codebase:** Understand existing system constraints and patterns
+- **runTasks:** Execute prototypes and validation tests
+- **editFiles:** Update research progress and findings
+- **vscodeAPI:** Test VS Code extension capabilities and limitations
+
+Focus on time-boxed research that resolves critical technical decisions and unblocks development progress.

package/templates/frontend/.github/prompts/csharp-nunit.prompt.md

@@ -0,0 +1,71 @@
+---
+tools: ['changes', 'search/codebase', 'edit/editFiles', 'problems', 'search']
+description: 'Get best practices for NUnit unit testing, including data-driven tests'
+---
+
+# NUnit Best Practices
+
+Your goal is to help me write effective unit tests with NUnit, covering both standard and data-driven testing approaches.
+
+## Project Setup
+
+- Use a separate test project with naming convention `[ProjectName].Tests`
+- Reference Microsoft.NET.Test.Sdk, NUnit, and NUnit3TestAdapter packages
+- Create test classes that match the classes being tested (e.g., `CalculatorTests` for `Calculator`)
+- Use .NET SDK test commands: `dotnet test` for running tests
+
+## Test Structure
+
+- Apply `[TestFixture]` attribute to test classes
+- Use `[Test]` attribute for test methods
+- Follow the Arrange-Act-Assert (AAA) pattern
+- Name tests using the pattern `MethodName_Scenario_ExpectedBehavior`
+- Use `[SetUp]` and `[TearDown]` for per-test setup and teardown
+- Use `[OneTimeSetUp]` and `[OneTimeTearDown]` for per-class setup and teardown
+- Use `[SetUpFixture]` for assembly-level setup and teardown
+
+## Standard Tests
+
+- Keep tests focused on a single behavior
+- Avoid testing multiple behaviors in one test method
+- Use clear assertions that express intent
+- Include only the assertions needed to verify the test case
+- Make tests independent and idempotent (can run in any order)
+- Avoid test interdependencies
+
+## Data-Driven Tests
+
+- Use `[TestCase]` for inline test data
+- Use `[TestCaseSource]` for programmatically generated test data
+- Use `[Values]` for simple parameter combinations
+- Use `[ValueSource]` for property or method-based data sources
+- Use `[Random]` for random numeric test values
+- Use `[Range]` for sequential numeric test values
+- Use `[Combinatorial]` or `[Pairwise]` for combining multiple parameters
+
+## Assertions
+
+- Use `Assert.That` with constraint model (preferred NUnit style)
+- Use constraints like `Is.EqualTo`, `Is.SameAs`, `Contains.Item`
+- Use `Assert.AreEqual` for simple value equality (classic style)
+- Use `CollectionAssert` for collection comparisons
+- Use `StringAssert` for string-specific assertions
+- Use `Assert.Throws<T>` or `Assert.ThrowsAsync<T>` to test exceptions
+- Use descriptive messages in assertions for clarity on failure
+
+## Mocking and Isolation
+
+- Consider using Moq or NSubstitute alongside NUnit
+- Mock dependencies to isolate units under test
+- Use interfaces to facilitate mocking
+- Consider using a DI container for complex test setups
+
+## Test Organization
+
+- Group tests by feature or component
+- Use categories with `[Category("CategoryName")]`
+- Use `[Order]` to control test execution order when necessary
+- Use `[Author("DeveloperName")]` to indicate ownership
+- Use `[Description]` to provide additional test information
+- Consider `[Explicit]` for tests that shouldn't run automatically
+- Use `[Ignore("Reason")]` to temporarily skip tests

package/templates/frontend/.github/prompts/ef-core.prompt.md

@@ -0,0 +1,76 @@
+---
+mode: 'agent'
+tools: ['changes', 'search/codebase', 'edit/editFiles', 'problems', 'runCommands']
+description: 'Get best practices for Entity Framework Core'
+---
+
+# Entity Framework Core Best Practices
+
+Your goal is to help me follow best practices when working with Entity Framework Core.
+
+## Data Context Design
+
+- Keep DbContext classes focused and cohesive
+- Use constructor injection for configuration options
+- Override OnModelCreating for fluent API configuration
+- Separate entity configurations using IEntityTypeConfiguration
+- Consider using DbContextFactory pattern for console apps or tests
+
+## Entity Design
+
+- Use meaningful primary keys (consider natural vs surrogate keys)
+- Implement proper relationships (one-to-one, one-to-many, many-to-many)
+- Use data annotations or fluent API for constraints and validations
+- Implement appropriate navigational properties
+- Consider using owned entity types for value objects
+
+## Performance
+
+- Use AsNoTracking() for read-only queries
+- Implement pagination for large result sets with Skip() and Take()
+- Use Include() to eager load related entities when needed
+- Consider projection (Select) to retrieve only required fields
+- Use compiled queries for frequently executed queries
+- Avoid N+1 query problems by properly including related data
+
+## Migrations
+
+- Create small, focused migrations
+- Name migrations descriptively
+- Verify migration SQL scripts before applying to production
+- Consider using migration bundles for deployment
+- Add data seeding through migrations when appropriate
+
+## Querying
+
+- Use IQueryable judiciously and understand when queries execute
+- Prefer strongly-typed LINQ queries over raw SQL
+- Use appropriate query operators (Where, OrderBy, GroupBy)
+- Consider database functions for complex operations
+- Implement specifications pattern for reusable queries
+
+## Change Tracking & Saving
+
+- Use appropriate change tracking strategies
+- Batch your SaveChanges() calls
+- Implement concurrency control for multi-user scenarios
+- Consider using transactions for multiple operations
+- Use appropriate DbContext lifetimes (scoped for web apps)
+
+## Security
+
+- Avoid SQL injection by using parameterized queries
+- Implement appropriate data access permissions
+- Be careful with raw SQL queries
+- Consider data encryption for sensitive information
+- Use migrations to manage database user permissions
+
+## Testing
+
+- Use in-memory database provider for unit tests
+- Create separate testing contexts with SQLite for integration tests
+- Mock DbContext and DbSet for pure unit tests
+- Test migrations in isolated environments
+- Consider snapshot testing for model changes
+
+When reviewing my EF Core code, identify issues and suggest improvements that follow these best practices.