@thehammer/danx-dashboard-mcp 0.1.101 → 0.1.104

package/dist/handlers.js

@@ -581,7 +581,7 @@ export async function issueChecklist(client, args) {
  * card is put in front of one; the reminder that used to ride the retired
  * `issue_requires_human({set: true})` now rides here instead.
  *
- * DX-2942 — `statement` is capped at 100 characters server-side (a 400 names
+ * DX-2942 — `statement` is capped at 200 characters server-side (a 400 names
  * the actual length otherwise); `context` is the markdown detail behind it,
  * sent only when given on `add`, and on `edit` `undefined` keeps the stored
  * context while `null` clears it — the same omit/null semantics

package/dist/index.js

@@ -555,7 +555,7 @@ const SOLUTION_FIELDS = {
     con: z.string().optional(),
     recommended: z.boolean().optional(),
 };
-server.tool("issue_problem", "A card's PROBLEMS via /api/issues/:id/problems[/:pid]: one statement the operator must resolve (a question, or a flaw in the plan), each with its own solutions/answers — one problem per question. OPEN = not yet answered; the card needs a human exactly while open_problem_count > 0 — there is no separate flag to set, adding a problem IS putting the card in front of a human. list → live problems in order, each {id, statement, context, content_hash, open, solutions[], decisions[]}; add {statement, context?, solutions?} → problem_id + solution_ids in one transaction (zero solutions is valid: the operator answers free-form) plus `problems_reminder: {open_problem_count, instruction}` naming each open problem's solution count; edit :pid {base_hash, statement, context?}; remove :pid {base_hash} — always allowed, even as the card's last open problem (DX-2830: removing it just means the card no longer needs a human). A stale base_hash → 409 `stale_problem` with currentHash + currentProblem: merge, then retry. No answer action — the operator answers in the dashboard. DX-2942 — `statement` is capped at 100 characters (a 400 names the actual length otherwise): write it as ONE plain question, and put any investigation detail in `context` (markdown, no cap) instead of running it on. Good: statement \"Which cache should we use?\", context \"Redis fits the read-heavy path; see benchmark in #123. Memcached is simpler ops but no persistence.\" Bad: statement \"We looked at Redis vs Memcached, ran benchmarks showing Redis 3x faster on reads, but Memcached has simpler ops and we're not sure persistence matters here since the cache is fully rebuildable from Postgres...\" (too long, refused — move it to context).", {
+server.tool("issue_problem", "A card's PROBLEMS via /api/issues/:id/problems[/:pid]: one statement the operator must resolve (a question, or a flaw in the plan), each with its own solutions/answers — one problem per question. OPEN = not yet answered; the card needs a human exactly while open_problem_count > 0 — there is no separate flag to set, adding a problem IS putting the card in front of a human. list → live problems in order, each {id, statement, context, content_hash, open, solutions[], decisions[]}; add {statement, context?, solutions?} → problem_id + solution_ids in one transaction (zero solutions is valid: the operator answers free-form) plus `problems_reminder: {open_problem_count, instruction}` naming each open problem's solution count; edit :pid {base_hash, statement, context?}; remove :pid {base_hash} — always allowed, even as the card's last open problem (DX-2830: removing it just means the card no longer needs a human). A stale base_hash → 409 `stale_problem` with currentHash + currentProblem: merge, then retry. No answer action — the operator answers in the dashboard. DX-2942 — `statement` is capped at 200 characters (a 400 names the actual length otherwise): write it as ONE plain question, and put any investigation detail in `context` (markdown, no cap) instead of running it on. Good: statement \"Which cache should we use?\", context \"Redis fits the read-heavy path; see benchmark in #123. Memcached is simpler ops but no persistence.\" Bad: statement \"We looked at Redis vs Memcached, ran benchmarks showing Redis 3x faster on reads, but Memcached has simpler ops and we're not sure persistence matters here since the cache is fully rebuildable from Postgres...\" (too long, refused — move it to context).", {
     id: z.string().min(1),
     action: z.enum(["list", "add", "edit", "remove"]),
     problem_id: z.number().int().positive().optional().describe("edit/remove"),

package/package.json

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 {
   "name": "@thehammer/danx-dashboard-mcp",
-  "version": "0.1.101",
+  "version": "0.1.104",
   "description": "Stdio MCP server wrapping danxbot's dashboard /api/issues/* normalized DB-backed HTTP routes for dispatched agents (DX-704 Phase 2).",
   "license": "MIT",
   "type": "module",