@the-agenticflow/openflows 0.1.6 → 0.1.8-dev.230.5aa03a0

package/bin/orchestration/plugin/skills/nexus-doc-coauthoring.md

@@ -1,21 +0,0 @@
----
-name: doc-coauthoring
-description: Collaborative workflow for drafting and refining project-level documents and plans.
----
-
-# NEXUS Collaborative Planning Skill
-
-Use this skill when collaborating with the user to build high-level project plans or architectural documents.
-
-## Collaborative Workflow
-
-1. **Gather Intent**: Ask clarifying questions to understand the project's "North Star".
-2. **Draft & Discuss**: Present a skeleton plan and wait for user feedback.
-3. **Iterative Refinement**: Refine the plan based on constraints and goals uncovered during the session.
-4. **Reader Projection**: Anticipate stakeholder questions and address them in the plan.
-
-## Focus Areas
-
-- Clarity of objectives.
-- Resource and time estimation.
-- Risk identification and mitigation strategies.

package/bin/orchestration/plugin/skills/nexus-internal-comms.md

@@ -1,28 +0,0 @@
----
-name: internal-comms
-description: Guidelines and templates for professional internal communications (status reports, project updates, etc.).
----
-
-# NEXUS Internal Comms Skill
-
-Use this skill to communicate project status, plans, and problems to stakeholders in a professional and structured manner.
-
-## Communication Types
-
-- **3P Updates**: Progress (what was done), Plans (what is next), Problems (blockers).
-- **Status Reports**: High-level summaries of project health.
-- **Leadership Updates**: Concise, executive-level summaries focusing on impact.
-- **Project Updates**: Detailed progress reports on specific initiatives.
-
-## Best Practices
-
-- **Tone**: Keep it objective, professional, and outcome-oriented.
-- **Clarity**: Use bullet points and clear headings to make updates scannable.
-- **Honesty**: Be transparent about problems and risks.
-- **Actionable**: Always include clear "Next Steps" or "Asks" for the reader.
-
-## 3P Template Format
-
-- **Progress**: Key accomplishments since the last update.
-- **Plans**: Primary objectives for the next period.
-- **Problems**: Current blockers or risks requiring attention.

package/bin/orchestration/plugin/skills/nexus-orchestration.md

@@ -1,63 +0,0 @@
----
-name: orchestration
-description: Core orchestration skill for assigning work and managing workers
----
-
-# NEXUS Orchestration Skill
-
-## Worker Assignment Protocol
-
-### Step 1: Check Worker Availability
-Read `KEY_WORKER_SLOTS` from shared store. Look for workers with status `Idle`.
-
-### Step 2: Prioritize Tickets
-- **BLOCKING (CI-FIRST):** CI setup tickets (IDs starting with `T-CI-`) must be assigned before any other work if `ci_readiness` is `missing` or `ci_must_go_first` is `true`. Without CI, VESSEL stalls on every PR.
-- High priority: Security fixes, blocking issues
-- Medium priority: Features, enhancements
-- Low priority: Refactors, documentation
-
-### Step 3: Match Worker to Ticket
-Consider:
-- Worker capacity (some workers may have specializations)
-- Ticket complexity vs worker history
-- Load balancing across workers
-
-### Step 4: Assign Work
-Update worker slot:
-```json
-{
-  "id": "forge-1",
-  "status": {
-    "Assigned": {
-      "ticket_id": "T-42",
-      "issue_url": "https://github.com/org/repo/issues/42"
-    }
-  }
-}
-```
-
-### Step 5: Emit Event
-Log assignment to event stream for observability.
-
-## Command Gate Protocol
-
-### Evaluating Dangerous Commands
-
-Workers may request approval for commands like:
-- `rm -rf` (file deletion)
-- `git push --force` (force push)
-- `npm publish` (package publishing)
-- Database migrations
-
-### Decision Framework
-
-1. **Necessity**: Is this command required for the ticket?
-2. **Risk**: What could go wrong?
-3. **Reversibility**: Can we undo the effects?
-4. **Alternatives**: Is there a safer approach?
-
-### Approval Response
-Set worker status from `Suspended` back to `Assigned`.
-
-### Rejection Response
-Set worker status to `Idle` with rejection reason.

package/bin/orchestration/plugin/skills/nexus-skill-creator.md

@@ -1,15 +0,0 @@
----
-name: skill-creator
-description: Supervisory skill for identifying, directing, and evaluating the creation of new agent capabilities.
----
-
-# NEXUS Skill Supervision Skill
-
-Use this skill to oversee the "meta-evolution" of the agent system by directing FORGE to create new skills.
-
-## Supervision Checklist
-
-- **Gap Identification**: Notice when agents struggle with a repeating pattern and need a skill.
-- **Direction**: Task FORGE with creating a specific `SKILL.md` based on successful session logs.
-- **Quality Gate**: Review new skills created by FORGE to ensure they are actionable and follow the AgentFlow standard.
-- **Integration**: Ensure new skills are correctly registered in the system manifest.

package/bin/orchestration/plugin/skills/nexus-slack-gif-creator.md

@@ -1,21 +0,0 @@
----
-name: slack-gif-creator
-description: Custom GIF animation for project status alerts and team communication.
----
-
-# NEXUS Communication Animations Skill
-
-Use this skill to create engaging, animated status alerts or celebration artifacts for the team.
-
-## Animation Concepts
-
-- **Pulse/Heartbeat**: For "System Alive" monitors.
-- **Explode/Particle Burst**: For "Project Milestone Achieved".
-- **Shake/Vibrate**: For "Critical Alert" or "Blocker Identified".
-- **Slide/Fade**: For transitioning between status updates.
-
-## Technical Execution
-
-- Use procedural graphics with easing functions for smooth motion.
-- Ensure GIFs are optimized for size without sacrificing visual clarity.
-- Maintain a tone that balances professionalism with team engagement.

package/bin/orchestration/plugin/skills/nexus-triage.md

@@ -1,56 +0,0 @@
----
-name: ticket-triage
-description: Skill for analyzing and prioritizing incoming tickets
----
-
-# Ticket Triage Skill
-
-## Analyzing Tickets
-
-### Extract Key Information
-From each ticket, identify:
-- **Type**: Bug, feature, refactor, documentation
-- **Priority**: Critical, high, medium, low
-- **Scope**: Files/components affected
-- **Dependencies**: Blocked by other tickets?
-- **Acceptance Criteria**: Definition of done
-
-### Estimation Heuristics
-
-| Scope | Estimated Segments |
-|-------|-------------------|
-| Single file, small change | 1-2 |
-| Multiple files, moderate | 3-5 |
-| Cross-cutting, large | 6-10 |
-
-### Blocking Detection
-
-A ticket is blocked if:
-- Depends on unmerged PR
-- Requires external API/service
-- Needs clarification from stakeholder
-
-## Prioritization Matrix
-
-```
-          | High Impact | Low Impact
----------|-------------|------------
-Urgent   | Do Now      | Schedule
-Not Urgent| Plan       | Backlog
-```
-
-## CI-First Override
-
-**CI setup tickets ALWAYS take absolute priority over all other tickets.**
-
-Before applying the normal matrix, check if the repository has CI workflows:
-- If `ci_readiness` is `missing`: Only CI setup tickets should be assigned
-- CI setup tickets are identified by: ID starting with `T-CI-`, or title containing "CI" + ("setup" or "pipeline" or "workflow")
-- Without CI, VESSEL cannot validate PRs and will stall, wasting all worker cycles
-- This override applies regardless of issue number, apparent urgency, or any other priority signal
-
-## Assignment Considerations
-
-- Complexity matching worker experience
-- File ownership (avoid conflicts)
-- Load balancing across available workers

package/bin/orchestration/plugin/skills/nexus-xlsx.md

@@ -1,20 +0,0 @@
----
-name: xlsx
-description: Analysis of project metrics, timelines, and budgets using Excel automation.
----
-
-# NEXUS Metrics Analysis Skill
-
-Use this skill to track and visualize project health through quantitative data analysis.
-
-## Metrics Tracking
-
-- **Velocity**: Track task completion rates and sprint progress.
-- **Budgeting**: Keep tabs on project costs and resource allocation.
-- **Timeline Modeling**: Generate "what-if" scenarios for project schedules.
-
-## Workflow
-
-1. Collect raw data from session logs or external trackers.
-2. Use formulas to calculate trends and health indicators.
-3. Present summaries in a clear, actionable format for stakeholders.

package/bin/orchestration/plugin/skills/sentinel-algorithmic-art.md

@@ -1,20 +0,0 @@
----
-name: algorithmic-art
-description: Use generative art principles to visualize code quality, coverage, and complex failure states.
----
-
-# SENTINEL Visual Diagnostics Skill
-
-Use this skill to create algorithmic visualizations of system health, testing results, or code complexity.
-
-## Visualizing Data
-
-- **Code Coverage**: Represent files as recursive treemaps where color indicates coverage depth.
-- **Failure Heatmaps**: Visualize test suite failures across the codebase chronologically or structurally.
-- **Complexity Clouds**: Use particle systems to represent cyclomatic complexity in large modules.
-
-## Goals
-
-- **Scannability**: Make complex system states readable at a glance.
-- **Impact**: Use motion and color to draw attention to critical bottlenecks or regressions.
-- **Diagnostic Clarity**: Ensure the visualization directly correlates with underlying metrics.

package/bin/orchestration/plugin/skills/sentinel-criteria.md

@@ -1,115 +0,0 @@
-# SENTINEL Evaluation Criteria
-
-## The five criteria - all must pass for any approval
-
-### 1. Correctness
-
-Does the implementation correctly handle all cases described in CONTRACT.md?
-Does it handle the error paths, edge cases, and boundary conditions?
-
-**FAIL:** any CONTRACT criterion not met, any obvious logic error
-
-### 2. Test coverage
-
-Are all changed files covered by tests?
-Does every new function have at least one test for the happy path
-and one for the primary error path?
-
-**FAIL:** any changed file with no tests, any new function with no test
-
-### 3. Standards compliance
-
-Does the implementation follow `orchestration/agent/standards/CODING.md`?
-Does it use the patterns in `orchestration/agent/arch/patterns.md`?
-Does it respect the API contracts in `orchestration/agent/arch/api-contracts.md`?
-
-**FAIL:** any violation of the team's written standards
-
-### 4. Code quality
-
-Is the code readable? Are names clear? Is complexity justified?
-Is there duplication that should be extracted?
-
-**NOTE:** This criterion is advisory - it cannot block alone.
-It informs feedback but a single quality concern is not a blocker.
-
-### 5. No regressions
-
-Do all existing tests still pass?
-Has any existing behaviour been changed without explicit ticket scope?
-
-**FAIL:** any previously passing test now failing
-
----
-
-## Evaluation checklist
-
-Use this checklist for every segment review:
-
-```markdown
-## Evaluation Checklist
-
-### Correctness
-- [ ] All CONTRACT criteria verified
-- [ ] Error paths handled
-- [ ] Edge cases covered
-- [ ] Boundary conditions tested
-
-### Test Coverage
-- [ ] All changed files have tests
-- [ ] New functions have happy path tests
-- [ ] New functions have error path tests
-- [ ] Integration tests where needed
-
-### Standards Compliance
-- [ ] CODING.md rules followed
-- [ ] patterns.md patterns used
-- [ ] API contracts respected
-- [ ] Naming conventions followed
-
-### Code Quality
-- [ ] Readable and clear
-- [ ] No unnecessary duplication
-- [ ] Appropriate abstraction level
-- [ ] Comments where needed
-
-### No Regressions
-- [ ] All existing tests pass
-- [ ] No unintended behavior changes
-```
-
----
-
-## Severity levels
-
-When writing feedback, indicate severity:
-
-- **BLOCKER:** Must be fixed before approval (correctness, test coverage, standards)
-- **MAJOR:** Should be fixed, but approval possible if addressed in next segment
-- **MINOR:** Advisory, can be deferred
-
-### Example with severity
-
-```markdown
-## Specific feedback
-
-- `src/auth/login.ts:23` [BLOCKER]: Missing error handling for `fetchUser()`. Required: Add try-catch with `AppError('USER_NOT_FOUND', 404)`
-
-- `src/auth/login.ts:67` [MAJOR]: Hardcoded timeout value. Required: Use `config.timeout` from `src/config.ts`
-
-- `src/auth/login.ts:89` [MINOR]: Variable name `tmp` is unclear. Consider: `userSession`
-```
-
----
-
-## Quick decision guide
-
-| Situation | Verdict |
-|-----------|---------|
-| All criteria pass | APPROVED |
-| Any BLOCKER items | CHANGES_REQUESTED |
-| Multiple MAJOR items | CHANGES_REQUESTED |
-| Only MINOR items | APPROVED (with notes) |
-| Tests failing | CHANGES_REQUESTED |
-| Lint warnings | CHANGES_REQUESTED |
-| Standards violation | CHANGES_REQUESTED |

package/bin/orchestration/plugin/skills/sentinel-frontend-design.md

@@ -1,20 +0,0 @@
----
-name: frontend-design
-description: Reference for evaluating UI quality and aesthetic consistency in frontend reviews.
----
-
-# SENTINEL Frontend Design Critique Skill
-
-Use this skill to evaluate the design quality of PRs and artifacts against project standards.
-
-## Critique Criteria
-
-- **Aesthetic Direction**: Does it follow a clear, bold direction? Is it cohesive?
-- **Typography Quality**: Are font choices intentional and well-paired? Is it distinct from generic defaults?
-- **Color Harmony**: Is the palette professional and balanced? Is there sufficient contrast?
-- **Visual Polish**: Check for spacing consistency, border-radius harmony, and attention to detail.
-- **Avoidance of "AI Slop"**: Does it feel designed, or just generated? Watch out for overused patterns (purple gradients, Inter-only stacks).
-
-## Reporting Feedback
-
-Provide constructive, specific feedback on how to elevate the design. Refer to the `Forge Frontend Design` standards.

package/bin/orchestration/plugin/skills/sentinel-review.md

@@ -1,124 +0,0 @@
-# SENTINEL Review Skill
-
-## Your role
-
-You are SENTINEL. You are spawned for a single purpose: evaluate one segment.
-You have no history. You have no future. You only have this segment.
-
-## Your disposition
-
-- Be skeptical
-- Be specific
-- Be constructive
-
-FORGE is your partner, not your adversary.
-Your feedback must be actionable - FORGE must know exactly what to fix.
-
-## Reviewing a plan (PLAN.md)
-
-Check:
-1. Does the plan address all acceptance criteria in TICKET.md?
-2. Does the technical approach follow `orchestration/agent/arch/patterns.md`?
-3. Are all relevant files identified?
-4. Is the definition of done specific and testable?
-5. Is there an explicit out-of-scope list?
-
-Write `CONTRACT.md` with:
-- `status: AGREED` if the plan is sound
-- `status: ISSUES` if there are problems (list specific objections)
-
-## Reviewing a segment
-
-Check:
-1. Run tests: `orchestration/agent/tooling/run-tests.sh` - they must all pass
-2. Run linter on changed files - zero warnings
-3. Read every changed file against the CONTRACT criteria
-4. Check error handling - every error path covered?
-5. Check test coverage - is every new function tested?
-6. Check standards compliance - CODING.md and patterns.md respected?
-
-## Writing feedback
-
-When writing `segment-N-eval.md` with `CHANGES_REQUESTED`:
-
-- Every item must have: `file`, `line number`, `problem`, `required fix`
-- Do NOT write vague feedback like "improve error handling"
-- DO write: `src/auth/session.ts line 47: throws raw Error. Required: throw new AppError('SESSION_EXPIRED', 401) per CODING.md rule 3`
-
-### Example segment eval
-
-```markdown
-# Segment 3 Evaluation
-
-## Verdict
-
-CHANGES_REQUESTED
-
-## Specific feedback
-
-- `src/auth/login.ts:23`: Missing error handling for `fetchUser()`. Required: Add try-catch with `AppError('USER_NOT_FOUND', 404)`
-
-- `tests/auth/login.test.ts:45`: Test only covers happy path. Required: Add test for invalid credentials returning 401
-
-- `src/auth/login.ts:67`: Hardcoded timeout value. Required: Use `config.timeout` from `src/config.ts`
-```
-
-## Final review
-
-When all segments are approved, run the complete verification:
-
-1. Full test suite via `orchestration/agent/tooling/run-tests.sh`
-2. Full linter across entire project
-3. Check every CONTRACT criterion is satisfied
-4. Write `final-review.md` with `APPROVED` verdict and PR description
-
-Your PR description becomes the actual PR body - make it informative.
-
-### Example final review
-
-```markdown
-# Final Review
-
-## Verdict
-
-APPROVED
-
-## Summary
-
-This PR implements JWT-based authentication for the login endpoint, including:
-- POST /auth/login endpoint with credential validation
-- JWT token generation with configurable expiry
-- Auth middleware for protected routes
-- Comprehensive test coverage (12 new tests)
-
-## PR description
-
-[Title: [T-42] Add user authentication endpoint]
-
-Implements JWT-based authentication for the login endpoint.
-
-### Changes
-- `src/auth/login.ts`: Login endpoint with credential validation
-- `src/auth/jwt.ts`: JWT token generation and validation
-- `src/middleware/auth.ts`: Auth middleware for protected routes
-- `tests/auth/`: Comprehensive test coverage
-
-### Testing
-- 12 new tests added
-- All existing tests still pass
-- Manual testing completed
-
-Closes #42
-
-> **IMPORTANT**: The PR body MUST include `Closes #<issue_number>` (with `#` prefix, no colon) to auto-close the issue on merge.
-> - Extract the issue number from `SPRINTLESS_TICKET_ID`: `T-004` → issue number `4`
-> - Use: `Closes #4` (correct) — NOT `Closes: T-004` (wrong)
-```
-
-## Environment variables
-
-- `SPRINTLESS_PAIR_ID` - the pair you're evaluating
-- `SPRINTLESS_TICKET_ID` - the ticket being worked on
-- `SPRINTLESS_SEGMENT` - segment number (empty for plan review, "final" for final review)
-- `SPRINTLESS_SHARED` - the shared directory with artifacts
-- `SPRINTLESS_WORKTREE` - the worktree to read files from

package/bin/orchestration/plugin/skills/sentinel-web-artifacts-builder.md

@@ -1,20 +0,0 @@
----
-name: web-artifacts-builder
-description: Skill for building reproduction environments and diagnostic dashboards for UI issues.
----
-
-# SENTINEL Diagnostic Artifacts Skill
-
-Use this skill to create visual dashboards or reproduction environments when debugging complex UI/UX issues.
-
-## Usage Scenarios
-
-- **Reproduction**: Build a minimal React artifact that demonstrates a reported bug.
-- **Diagnostics**: Create a dashboard visualizing log data or state transitions for a failed session.
-- **Comparison**: Show a side-by-side comparison of "Expected" vs "Actual" UI states.
-
-## Best Practices
-
-- Keep diagnostic artifacts focused on the issue at hand.
-- Use clear visual indicators (red/green, status badges) to highlight problems.
-- Ensure the reproduction is self-contained and easy for the user to view.

package/bin/orchestration/plugin/skills/sentinel-webapp-testing.md

@@ -1,34 +0,0 @@
----
-name: webapp-testing
-description: Toolkit for interacting with and testing local web applications using Playwright.
----
-
-# Web Application Testing Skill
-
-Use this skill to verify frontend functionality, debug UI behavior, and capture browser state for evaluation or deployment verification.
-
-## Workflow
-
-1. **Reconnaissance**:
-   - Navigate to the local server URL.
-   - Wait for `networkidle` state to ensure JS execution is complete.
-   - Inspect the rendered DOM or take a full-page screenshot.
-
-2. **Identification**:
-   - Locate specific elements using descriptive selectors (`text=`, `role=`, CSS, or IDs).
-   - Use `page.locator()` and `all()` to discover interactive elements.
-
-3. **Execution**:
-   - Write Playwright scripts to perform actions (click, type, navigate).
-   - Verify assertions and capture logs for debugging.
-
-## Helper Pattern
-
-When working with local servers, ensure the server is running correctly before beginning reconnaissance. If managing server lifecycles, wait for port availability.
-
-## Best Practices
-
-- **Synchronous Logic**: Use `playwright.sync_api` for cleaner script integration where applicable.
-- **Headless Mode**: Always launch browsers in headless mode for server-side execution.
-- **Waits**: Use `wait_for_selector` or specific network idle states instead of arbitrary timeouts.
-- **Artifacts**: Capture screenshots and console logs to provide proof of verification.

package/bin/orchestration/plugin/skills/shared-claude-api.md

@@ -1,25 +0,0 @@
----
-name: claude-api
-description: Technical reference for Claude-specific features and best practices.
----
-
-# Shared Claude API Skill
-
-Use this reference to optimize interactions with the Claude LLM, utilizing advanced features for improved performance and cost-efficiency.
-
-## Core Features
-
-- **Thinking & Effort**: Adjust `thinking` parameters for complex reasoning tasks.
-- **Prompt Caching**: Structure prompts to take advantage of caching for repetitive context.
-- **Tool Use**: Follow best practices for tool definition and selection.
-- **Streaming**: Handle streaming responses efficiently in the CLI/Frontend.
-
-## Best Practices
-
-- **System Prompting**: Provide clear, concise role definitions.
-- **Context Management**: Be mindful of the context window; use summarization or trimming when necessary.
-- **Output Formatting**: Request specific formats (JSON, Markdown) explicitly for deterministic processing.
-
-## Managed Agents (Beta)
-
-When coordinating with other agents, follow the established orchestration protocol defined in the `AgentFlow` system instructions.

package/bin/orchestration/plugin/skills/vessel-ci-gate.md

@@ -1,68 +0,0 @@
----
-name: ci-gate
-description: Skill for checking CI status and validating merge readiness
----
-
-# CI Gate Skill
-
-## CI Readiness Pre-Check
-
-**BEFORE polling CI status**, check if the repository has CI workflows configured:
-
-1. Use `has_workflows` on the GitHub client to check if `.github/workflows/` exists
-2. Check `ci_readiness` in the shared store if available
-
-If **no CI workflows exist**:
-- Do NOT poll CI status — there is nothing to poll
-- Return `CiStatus::Success` immediately (empty check suites = pass by default)
-- Emit a `ci_missing` event to alert NEXUS that CI setup is required
-- Log a WARNING that the repository has no CI pipelines
-
-This prevents VESSEL from spending polling cycles waiting for CI that will never arrive,
-which causes watchdog timeouts and stalls the entire pair.
-
-## CI Status Check
-
-Use `check_ci_status` MCP tool to verify:
-- All required checks passed
-- No failing checks
-- No pending checks (unless configured to allow)
-
-## Required Checks
-
-Typical required checks:
-- Build: Compiles successfully
-- Tests: All tests pass
-- Lint: No lint errors
-- Security: No vulnerabilities detected
-
-## CI Status Values
-
-| Status | Action |
-|--------|--------|
-| `success` | All checks passed |
-| `failure` | One or more checks failed |
-| `pending` | Checks still running |
-| `unknown` | No CI configured — treat as `success` and alert NEXUS |
-
-## Merge Readiness
-
-PR is ready to merge when:
-1. CI status is `success`
-2. SENTINEL approval exists (final-review.md)
-3. No merge conflicts
-4. Branch is up to date with main
-
-## Handling Failures
-
-If CI fails:
-1. Do NOT merge
-2. Report failure to NEXUS
-3. Return `deploy_failed` action with details
-
-## Handling Pending
-
-If CI is pending:
-1. Wait and poll
-2. Timeout after configured duration
-3. Report timeout if exceeded

package/bin/orchestration/plugin/skills/vessel-internal-comms.md

@@ -1,20 +0,0 @@
----
-name: internal-comms
-description: Tailored guidelines for deployment reports, incident logs, and release notes.
----
-
-# VESSEL Deployment Communications Skill
-
-Use this skill to communicate deployment outcomes and system health updates to the team.
-
-## Formats
-
-- **Deployment Summary**: SHA, Environment, Status (Success/Failure), and smoke test results.
-- **Incident Logs**: Detailed timeline of deployment failures and recovery actions taken.
-- **Release Notes**: Developer-focused summaries of what was deployed.
-
-## Tonal Goals
-
-- **Highly Informational**: Focus on raw data and outcomes.
-- **Action-Oriented**: In case of failure, clearly state the rollback status or required human intervention.
-- **Reliable**: Maintain a predictable format for automated parsing or quick human review.