@tgoodington/intuition 9.5.0 → 10.1.0
This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
- package/README.md +21 -28
- package/package.json +1 -1
- package/scripts/install-skills.js +17 -4
- package/scripts/uninstall-skills.js +3 -0
- package/skills/intuition-build/SKILL.md +21 -0
- package/skills/intuition-debugger/SKILL.md +14 -4
- package/skills/intuition-detail/SKILL.md +25 -1
- package/skills/intuition-initialize/SKILL.md +1 -1
- package/skills/intuition-initialize/references/agents_template.md +12 -19
- package/skills/intuition-initialize/references/claude_template.md +30 -34
- package/skills/intuition-initialize/references/intuition_readme_template.md +21 -29
- package/skills/intuition-meander/SKILL.md +80 -0
- package/skills/intuition-outline/SKILL.md +50 -2
- package/skills/intuition-start/SKILL.md +3 -3
- package/skills/intuition-test/SKILL.md +12 -1
- package/skills/intuition-think-tank/SKILL.md +159 -0
- package/skills/intuition-design/SKILL.md +0 -385
- package/skills/intuition-engineer/SKILL.md +0 -307
package/README.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -15,11 +15,10 @@ This installs 12 skills globally to `~/.claude/skills/`. Verify by typing `/` in
|
|
|
15
15
|
|
|
16
16
|
## Workflow
|
|
17
17
|
|
|
18
|
-
|
|
18
|
+
Two workflow modes:
|
|
19
19
|
|
|
20
|
-
|
|
21
|
-
prompt → outline →
|
|
22
|
-
```
|
|
20
|
+
**v9 (current):** `prompt → outline → assemble → detail → build → test`
|
|
21
|
+
**v8 (legacy):** `prompt → outline → build` (with handoff transitions)
|
|
23
22
|
|
|
24
23
|
The first cycle is the **trunk**. After completion, create **branches** for new features or changes.
|
|
25
24
|
|
|
@@ -29,18 +28,14 @@ The first cycle is the **trunk**. After completion, create **branches** for new
|
|
|
29
28
|
/intuition-initialize # Set up project memory (once per project)
|
|
30
29
|
/intuition-start # Check status, get routed to next step
|
|
31
30
|
/intuition-prompt # Describe what you want to build
|
|
32
|
-
/intuition-handoff # Process → move to outlining
|
|
33
31
|
/intuition-outline # Create the blueprint
|
|
34
|
-
/intuition-
|
|
35
|
-
/intuition-
|
|
36
|
-
/intuition-handoff # Prepare for engineering
|
|
37
|
-
/intuition-engineer # Create code specifications
|
|
38
|
-
/intuition-handoff # Prepare for build
|
|
32
|
+
/intuition-assemble # Match tasks to domain specialists
|
|
33
|
+
/intuition-detail # Specialists produce blueprints
|
|
39
34
|
/intuition-build # Implement and verify
|
|
40
|
-
/intuition-
|
|
35
|
+
/intuition-test # Quality gate
|
|
41
36
|
```
|
|
42
37
|
|
|
43
|
-
Run `/clear` before each phase skill to keep context clean.
|
|
38
|
+
Run `/clear` before each phase skill to keep context clean.
|
|
44
39
|
|
|
45
40
|
## Skills
|
|
46
41
|
|
|
@@ -49,20 +44,28 @@ Run `/clear` before each phase skill to keep context clean. Not every project ne
|
|
|
49
44
|
| Skill | Model | Purpose |
|
|
50
45
|
|-------|-------|---------|
|
|
51
46
|
| `/intuition-prompt` | opus | Refines a rough idea into an outline-ready brief |
|
|
52
|
-
| `/intuition-outline` | opus | Strategic blueprint with tasks, dependencies,
|
|
53
|
-
| `/intuition-
|
|
54
|
-
| `/intuition-
|
|
55
|
-
| `/intuition-build` | sonnet | Delegates implementation, verifies against
|
|
47
|
+
| `/intuition-outline` | opus | Strategic blueprint with tasks, dependencies, depth assessment |
|
|
48
|
+
| `/intuition-assemble` | sonnet | Matches tasks to domain specialists and producers |
|
|
49
|
+
| `/intuition-detail` | opus | Domain specialists produce detailed blueprints |
|
|
50
|
+
| `/intuition-build` | sonnet | Delegates implementation, verifies against blueprints |
|
|
51
|
+
| `/intuition-test` | opus | Post-build quality gate — test strategy and execution |
|
|
56
52
|
|
|
57
53
|
### Infrastructure
|
|
58
54
|
|
|
59
55
|
| Skill | Model | Purpose |
|
|
60
56
|
|-------|-------|---------|
|
|
61
57
|
| `/intuition-start` | haiku | Detects phase, routes to next skill, version check |
|
|
62
|
-
| `/intuition-handoff` |
|
|
58
|
+
| `/intuition-handoff` | sonnet | Branch creation, v8 state transitions, migrations |
|
|
63
59
|
| `/intuition-initialize` | haiku | Project memory setup (run once) |
|
|
64
60
|
| `/intuition-update` | haiku | Package update manager |
|
|
65
61
|
|
|
62
|
+
### Standalone Tools
|
|
63
|
+
|
|
64
|
+
| Skill | Model | Purpose |
|
|
65
|
+
|-------|-------|---------|
|
|
66
|
+
| `/intuition-meander` | opus | Thought partner — reason through problems collaboratively |
|
|
67
|
+
| `/intuition-think-tank` | opus | Rapid expert-panel analysis of documents, ideas, or proposals |
|
|
68
|
+
|
|
66
69
|
### Advisory
|
|
67
70
|
|
|
68
71
|
| Skill | Model | Purpose |
|
|
@@ -73,21 +76,12 @@ Run `/clear` before each phase skill to keep context clean. Not every project ne
|
|
|
73
76
|
|
|
74
77
|
## Key Concepts
|
|
75
78
|
|
|
76
|
-
### Engineer → Build Split
|
|
77
|
-
|
|
78
|
-
- **Engineer** (opus) determines the code-level HOW: researches codebase, discusses decisions interactively, produces `code_specs.md`
|
|
79
|
-
- **Build** (sonnet) implements against specs: delegates to subagents, verifies with reviewers, runs mandatory security review, produces `build_report.md`
|
|
80
|
-
|
|
81
79
|
### Trunk and Branches
|
|
82
80
|
|
|
83
81
|
- **Trunk**: First prompt→build cycle — the foundation
|
|
84
82
|
- **Branches**: Subsequent cycles that read parent context for continuity
|
|
85
83
|
- After any cycle completes, `/intuition-start` offers branch creation or debugging
|
|
86
84
|
|
|
87
|
-
### Design Loop
|
|
88
|
-
|
|
89
|
-
The outline flags tasks needing design exploration. Handoff manages a loop: design one item → check for more → design next or advance to engineer.
|
|
90
|
-
|
|
91
85
|
### Project Memory
|
|
92
86
|
|
|
93
87
|
All workflow state and knowledge lives in `docs/project_notes/`:
|
|
@@ -103,8 +97,7 @@ intuition/
|
|
|
103
97
|
│ ├── intuition-start/ # Session primer + routing
|
|
104
98
|
│ ├── intuition-prompt/ # Discovery refinement
|
|
105
99
|
│ ├── intuition-outline/ # Strategic outlining
|
|
106
|
-
│ ├── intuition-
|
|
107
|
-
│ ├── intuition-engineer/ # Code spec creation
|
|
100
|
+
│ ├── intuition-meander/ # Thought partner
|
|
108
101
|
│ ├── intuition-build/ # Implementation + verification
|
|
109
102
|
│ ├── intuition-handoff/ # State transitions + briefs
|
|
110
103
|
│ ├── intuition-debugger/ # Post-completion diagnostics
|
package/package.json
CHANGED
|
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
|
|
|
1
1
|
{
|
|
2
2
|
"name": "@tgoodington/intuition",
|
|
3
|
-
"version": "
|
|
3
|
+
"version": "10.1.0",
|
|
4
4
|
"description": "Domain-adaptive workflow system for Claude Code: prompt, outline, assemble specialist teams, detail with domain experts, build with format producers, test code output. Supports v8 compat (design, engineer, build) and v9 specialist workflows with 14 domain specialists and 6 format producers.",
|
|
5
5
|
"keywords": [
|
|
6
6
|
"claude-code",
|
|
@@ -46,8 +46,8 @@ const skills = [
|
|
|
46
46
|
'intuition-prompt',
|
|
47
47
|
'intuition-handoff',
|
|
48
48
|
'intuition-outline',
|
|
49
|
-
'intuition-
|
|
50
|
-
'intuition-
|
|
49
|
+
'intuition-meander',
|
|
50
|
+
'intuition-think-tank',
|
|
51
51
|
'intuition-build',
|
|
52
52
|
'intuition-test',
|
|
53
53
|
'intuition-debugger',
|
|
@@ -117,6 +117,19 @@ try {
|
|
|
117
117
|
log(`Removed old /intuition-execute skill (split into /intuition-engineer + /intuition-build in v8.0)`);
|
|
118
118
|
}
|
|
119
119
|
|
|
120
|
+
// Remove old design/engineer skills if they exist (removed in v10.0)
|
|
121
|
+
const oldDesignDest = path.join(claudeSkillsDir, 'intuition-design');
|
|
122
|
+
if (fs.existsSync(oldDesignDest)) {
|
|
123
|
+
fs.rmSync(oldDesignDest, { recursive: true, force: true });
|
|
124
|
+
log(`Removed old /intuition-design skill (removed in v10.0)`);
|
|
125
|
+
}
|
|
126
|
+
|
|
127
|
+
const oldEngineerDest = path.join(claudeSkillsDir, 'intuition-engineer');
|
|
128
|
+
if (fs.existsSync(oldEngineerDest)) {
|
|
129
|
+
fs.rmSync(oldEngineerDest, { recursive: true, force: true });
|
|
130
|
+
log(`Removed old /intuition-engineer skill (removed in v10.0)`);
|
|
131
|
+
}
|
|
132
|
+
|
|
120
133
|
// Remove old plan skill if it exists (renamed to outline in v9.1)
|
|
121
134
|
const oldPlanDest = path.join(claudeSkillsDir, 'intuition-plan');
|
|
122
135
|
if (fs.existsSync(oldPlanDest)) {
|
|
@@ -229,8 +242,8 @@ try {
|
|
|
229
242
|
log(` /intuition-prompt - Focused discovery (prompt-engineering refinement)`);
|
|
230
243
|
log(` /intuition-handoff - Handoff orchestrator (phase transitions + design loop)`);
|
|
231
244
|
log(` /intuition-outline - Strategic outline (ARCH protocol + design flagging)`);
|
|
232
|
-
log(` /intuition-
|
|
233
|
-
log(` /intuition-
|
|
245
|
+
log(` /intuition-meander - Thought partner (reasoning + exploration)`);
|
|
246
|
+
log(` /intuition-think-tank - Rapid expert-panel analysis`);
|
|
234
247
|
log(` /intuition-assemble - Team assembler (v9 specialist/producer matching)`);
|
|
235
248
|
log(` /intuition-detail - Domain specialist orchestrator (v9 detail phase)`);
|
|
236
249
|
log(` /intuition-build - Build manager (blueprint + producer delegation)`);
|
|
@@ -79,6 +79,7 @@ Read these files:
|
|
|
79
79
|
5. `{context_path}/scratch/*-decisions.json` (all specialist decision logs) — decision tiers and chosen options.
|
|
80
80
|
6. `{context_path}/prompt_brief.md` — Commander's Intent, success criteria, non-negotiables (for Vision Alignment in report).
|
|
81
81
|
7. `{context_path}/vision-review.md` (if exists) — flagged items from detail's vision review that build should address.
|
|
82
|
+
8. `{context_path}/process_flow.md` (if exists) — end-to-end user flows, component interactions, data paths, error paths. Used for flow verification in Layer 2 and as orientation context for producers.
|
|
82
83
|
|
|
83
84
|
From team_assignment.json, extract:
|
|
84
85
|
- `specialist_assignments` — which specialist owns which tasks
|
|
@@ -165,6 +166,9 @@ The full blueprint contains all specifications — do not deviate from them.
|
|
|
165
166
|
|
|
166
167
|
Output directory: [from blueprint's Producer Handoff]
|
|
167
168
|
Output files: [from blueprint's Producer Handoff]
|
|
169
|
+
|
|
170
|
+
## Flow Context (if process_flow.md exists)
|
|
171
|
+
[Extract the relevant flow segment from process_flow.md showing where this deliverable fits in the end-to-end path. This is for orientation only — your specifications come from the blueprint.]
|
|
168
172
|
```
|
|
169
173
|
|
|
170
174
|
When building on a branch, add to subagent prompts:
|
|
@@ -218,6 +222,16 @@ Check the deliverable yourself against outline.md acceptance criteria:
|
|
|
218
222
|
|
|
219
223
|
Log all deviations (additions and omissions) in the build report's "Deviations from Blueprint" section, even if they seem minor.
|
|
220
224
|
|
|
225
|
+
**Process flow verification (conditional):**
|
|
226
|
+
If `{context_path}/process_flow.md` exists, verify the produced deliverables match the described end-to-end flows:
|
|
227
|
+
- Trace each Core Flow's path against the implemented code. Do the components interact as described?
|
|
228
|
+
- Check that error paths described in process_flow.md have corresponding implementation.
|
|
229
|
+
- Check that integration seams have matching contracts on both sides.
|
|
230
|
+
|
|
231
|
+
Log any mismatches in the build report under "Process Flow Deviations." If a deviation affects what the end user sees or experiences, escalate via AskUserQuestion with options: "Fix the code to match the process flow" / "Accept the deviation" / "I need to think about this." If the user accepts a deviation, note in the build report that process_flow.md is stale at that section.
|
|
232
|
+
|
|
233
|
+
In **fast track mode**, treat process_flow.md as advisory only — log observations but do not escalate deviations (the document is in skeletal draft form without detail refinement).
|
|
234
|
+
|
|
221
235
|
- If FAIL → send feedback back to the producer with specific acceptance criteria gaps. Do NOT proceed to Layer 3.
|
|
222
236
|
- If PASS → proceed to Layer 3.
|
|
223
237
|
|
|
@@ -322,6 +336,13 @@ Write the build report to `{context_path}/build_report.md` AND display a summary
|
|
|
322
336
|
|
|
323
337
|
[If no test deliverables were found in any blueprint, write "No test deliverables found in blueprints."]
|
|
324
338
|
|
|
339
|
+
## Process Flow Deviations
|
|
340
|
+
[Cross-cutting deviations between implementation and process_flow.md. If no process_flow.md exists, write "N/A — no process flow document." If no deviations, write "None — implementation matches process flows."]
|
|
341
|
+
|
|
342
|
+
| Flow | Deviation | Resolution |
|
|
343
|
+
|------|-----------|------------|
|
|
344
|
+
| [flow name] | [what differs] | [Fixed / Accepted — user approved / Flagged for update] |
|
|
345
|
+
|
|
325
346
|
## Vision Alignment
|
|
326
347
|
[Read `{context_path}/prompt_brief.md` — extract Success Criteria and Commander's Intent non-negotiables. Map each to the produced output.]
|
|
327
348
|
|
|
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ name: intuition-debugger
|
|
|
3
3
|
description: Expert diagnostic and resolution service for completed workflow contexts. Investigates issues holistically — considering architectural alignment, security, ripple effects, maintenance burden, and functional correctness — then presents solution options in plain language for a non-technical creative director. Generates fast-track briefs when issues require upstream workflow passes.
|
|
4
4
|
model: opus
|
|
5
5
|
tools: Read, Write, Edit, Glob, Grep, Agent, AskUserQuestion, Bash, mcp__ide__getDiagnostics
|
|
6
|
-
allowed-tools: Read, Write, Edit, Glob, Grep, Bash, mcp__ide__getDiagnostics
|
|
6
|
+
allowed-tools: Read, Write, Edit, Glob, Grep, Agent, Bash, mcp__ide__getDiagnostics
|
|
7
7
|
---
|
|
8
8
|
|
|
9
9
|
# CRITICAL RULES
|
|
@@ -105,10 +105,11 @@ Read ALL of these before proceeding — build your understanding of what was bui
|
|
|
105
105
|
- `docs/project_notes/bugs.md` — previously logged bugs
|
|
106
106
|
- `{context_path}/scratch/*-decisions.json` — specialist decisions (if any exist)
|
|
107
107
|
|
|
108
|
-
Also check for blueprints:
|
|
108
|
+
Also check for blueprints and process flow:
|
|
109
109
|
- `{context_path}/blueprints/*.md` — detailed specialist blueprints (if detail phase ran)
|
|
110
|
+
- `{context_path}/process_flow.md` (if exists) — end-to-end user flows, component interactions, data paths, error paths, state mutations, integration seams, known invariants. This is your primary map of how the app works. Use it to understand upstream/downstream impact before reading source code.
|
|
110
111
|
|
|
111
|
-
The gap between intended approach and actual implementation is where bugs hide. The decisions files tell you what constraints MUST be preserved.
|
|
112
|
+
The gap between intended approach and actual implementation is where bugs hide. The decisions files tell you what constraints MUST be preserved. The process flow document tells you how the pieces connect — trace the reported issue through the flow to understand the full impact chain.
|
|
112
113
|
|
|
113
114
|
Do NOT read source code files yet. Read targeted code only after the user describes the issue.
|
|
114
115
|
|
|
@@ -164,7 +165,8 @@ With the root cause identified, evaluate through EVERY lens:
|
|
|
164
165
|
- Check: input validation, output encoding, auth boundaries, data exposure.
|
|
165
166
|
|
|
166
167
|
**Ripple Effects:**
|
|
167
|
-
-
|
|
168
|
+
- If `{context_path}/process_flow.md` exists, start with it: identify which Core Flows pass through the affected area, what's upstream and downstream, and what state mutations or integration seams are involved. Use the Component Dependencies and Integration Seams sections to pre-map the blast radius before launching a researcher.
|
|
169
|
+
- Launch an `intuition-researcher` agent to verify and extend the process flow mapping against actual code:
|
|
168
170
|
```
|
|
169
171
|
"Map all imports, usages, and dependents of [affected module/function/interface]
|
|
170
172
|
across the codebase. Report: file paths, line numbers, how each usage depends
|
|
@@ -395,6 +397,14 @@ After the subagent returns:
|
|
|
395
397
|
- **Prevention**: [How to avoid in future — what should the build process catch?]
|
|
396
398
|
```
|
|
397
399
|
|
|
400
|
+
**Update process flow (conditional)** — If `{context_path}/process_flow.md` exists AND the fix changes how a flow actually works (e.g., adds error handling that changes an error path, restructures a component interaction, or modifies state mutations):
|
|
401
|
+
1. Read the current process_flow.md
|
|
402
|
+
2. Update ONLY the specific flow section affected by the fix
|
|
403
|
+
3. Add an entry to the Flow History table: `| [YYYY-MM-DD] | Debugger | [What changed] | [Fix for: brief issue description] |`
|
|
404
|
+
4. Add or update the Known Fragile Areas section if the investigation revealed a fragile pattern
|
|
405
|
+
|
|
406
|
+
Do NOT update process_flow.md for fixes that don't change flow behavior (e.g., fixing a typo, correcting a calculation that doesn't change the data path). Do NOT rewrite the Overview or restructure the document. When generating a fast-track brief (upstream fix), do NOT update process_flow.md — the upstream workflow will update it after implementing changes.
|
|
407
|
+
|
|
398
408
|
**Save Intuition memory** — When the investigation reveals something with cross-conversation value, save a memory file to `C:\Users\tgoodington\.claude\projects\C--Claude-Projects-Intuition\memory\`:
|
|
399
409
|
|
|
400
410
|
Save a memory when:
|
|
@@ -404,6 +404,29 @@ Triggers when Step 8d finds no remaining specialists.
|
|
|
404
404
|
|
|
405
405
|
**9a. Conflict detection.** Spawn an `intuition-researcher` agent: "Read all blueprint files in `{context_path}/blueprints/`. Compare for: contradictory decisions, overlapping file modifications with conflicting changes, inconsistent interface assumptions, and duplicated work. Write findings to `{context_path}/blueprint-conflicts.md`. If no conflicts, write 'No conflicts detected.'" Wait for completion. If conflicts found, present to user via AskUserQuestion and resolve before continuing.
|
|
406
406
|
|
|
407
|
+
**9a-ii. Process flow synthesis (conditional).** Skip this step if `{context_path}/process_flow.md` does not exist (non-code project or Lightweight outline).
|
|
408
|
+
|
|
409
|
+
If `process_flow.md` exists, spawn an `intuition-synthesizer` agent:
|
|
410
|
+
|
|
411
|
+
"Read these files:
|
|
412
|
+
1. `{context_path}/process_flow.md` — the outline's initial WHAT-level flow draft
|
|
413
|
+
2. For each blueprint in `{context_path}/blueprints/`: read Section 3 (Approach) and Section 7 (Integration Points) only
|
|
414
|
+
|
|
415
|
+
Refine the process flow document with specialist knowledge. The outline draft describes flows at the WHAT level. Your job is to add the HOW:
|
|
416
|
+
- Fill in concrete data paths, state transitions, and error propagation chains from the blueprints
|
|
417
|
+
- Add state mutations per flow (which stores are written, by which step)
|
|
418
|
+
- Add known invariants per flow (things that MUST remain true)
|
|
419
|
+
- Populate the Component Dependencies section from blueprint integration points
|
|
420
|
+
- Populate Integration Seams with contracts and failure modes
|
|
421
|
+
- Resolve any conflicts between the outline's assumed flows and specialist approaches (specialist knowledge supersedes outline assumptions — they had deeper research)
|
|
422
|
+
- Update the Flow History table
|
|
423
|
+
|
|
424
|
+
Keep the document under 200 lines for Standard-tier projects, under 400 for Comprehensive. Be terse — structured steps, not prose.
|
|
425
|
+
|
|
426
|
+
Write the refined document to `{context_path}/process_flow.md` (overwriting the outline's draft)."
|
|
427
|
+
|
|
428
|
+
Wait for completion. If the vision review (9b) later triggers a specialist re-run, re-run this synthesis step after the re-run completes.
|
|
429
|
+
|
|
407
430
|
**9b. Vision review.** Skip this step if only 1 specialist completed (no cross-specialist seams to check).
|
|
408
431
|
|
|
409
432
|
For multi-specialist projects, spawn an `intuition-reviewer` agent:
|
|
@@ -411,7 +434,8 @@ For multi-specialist projects, spawn an `intuition-reviewer` agent:
|
|
|
411
434
|
"Read these files:
|
|
412
435
|
1. `{context_path}/prompt_brief.md` — extract Commander's Intent (desired end state, non-negotiables, boundaries) and Success Criteria
|
|
413
436
|
2. `{context_path}/outline.md` — extract the task list and acceptance criteria
|
|
414
|
-
3.
|
|
437
|
+
3. `{context_path}/process_flow.md` (if exists) — the refined end-to-end flow document. Check that flows honor Commander's Intent and that no seams are missing.
|
|
438
|
+
4. For each blueprint in `{context_path}/blueprints/`: read the Approach section (Section 3) and Acceptance Mapping section (Section 6) only — skip the full deliverable specs
|
|
415
439
|
|
|
416
440
|
Then evaluate the blueprints AS A WHOLE against the original vision:
|
|
417
441
|
|
|
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ name: intuition-initialize
|
|
|
3
3
|
description: Set up project memory infrastructure with workflow state tracking, memory files, and configuration templates.
|
|
4
4
|
model: haiku
|
|
5
5
|
tools: Read, Write, Glob, Grep, Bash, AskUserQuestion
|
|
6
|
-
allowed-tools: Read, Write, Glob, Grep
|
|
6
|
+
allowed-tools: Read, Write, Glob, Grep, Bash
|
|
7
7
|
---
|
|
8
8
|
|
|
9
9
|
# Initialize - Project Memory Setup Protocol
|
|
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
|
|
|
2
2
|
|
|
3
3
|
## Overview
|
|
4
4
|
|
|
5
|
-
This project uses a multi-agent system coordinated by Intuition (`@tgoodington/intuition`), a Claude Code skill system.
|
|
5
|
+
This project uses a multi-agent system coordinated by Intuition (`@tgoodington/intuition`), a Claude Code skill system. Specialized skills handle prompt refinement, planning, domain-specialist detailing, and build execution, with memory maintained in `docs/project_notes/` for consistency across sessions.
|
|
6
6
|
|
|
7
7
|
## Workflow Skills
|
|
8
8
|
|
|
@@ -12,9 +12,10 @@ This project uses a multi-agent system coordinated by Intuition (`@tgoodington/i
|
|
|
12
12
|
|-------|-------|-------------|
|
|
13
13
|
| `/intuition-prompt` | opus | Transforms a rough vision into a planning-ready brief through focused iterative refinement |
|
|
14
14
|
| `/intuition-outline` | opus | Strategic architect — maps stakeholders, explores components, evaluates options, creates executable blueprint |
|
|
15
|
-
| `/intuition-
|
|
16
|
-
| `/intuition-
|
|
17
|
-
| `/intuition-build` | sonnet | Delegates implementation to subagents, verifies outputs against
|
|
15
|
+
| `/intuition-assemble` | sonnet | Matches tasks to domain specialists and format producers |
|
|
16
|
+
| `/intuition-detail` | opus | Domain specialists produce detailed blueprints through exploration and user gates |
|
|
17
|
+
| `/intuition-build` | sonnet | Delegates implementation to subagents, verifies outputs against blueprints and acceptance criteria |
|
|
18
|
+
| `/intuition-test` | opus | Post-build quality gate — test strategy design and execution |
|
|
18
19
|
|
|
19
20
|
### Infrastructure
|
|
20
21
|
|
|
@@ -29,6 +30,8 @@ This project uses a multi-agent system coordinated by Intuition (`@tgoodington/i
|
|
|
29
30
|
|
|
30
31
|
| Skill | Model | What it does |
|
|
31
32
|
|-------|-------|-------------|
|
|
33
|
+
| `/intuition-meander` | opus | Thought partner — collaborative reasoning and problem exploration |
|
|
34
|
+
| `/intuition-think-tank` | opus | Rapid expert-panel analysis of documents, ideas, or proposals |
|
|
32
35
|
| `/intuition-debugger` | opus | Expert debugger — 5 diagnostic categories, causal chain analysis, post-completion only |
|
|
33
36
|
| `/intuition-agent-advisor` | opus | Expert advisor on building custom Claude Code agents |
|
|
34
37
|
| `/intuition-skill-guide` | opus | Expert advisor on building custom Claude Code skills |
|
|
@@ -41,12 +44,11 @@ This project uses a multi-agent system coordinated by Intuition (`@tgoodington/i
|
|
|
41
44
|
|
|
42
45
|
## Workflow
|
|
43
46
|
|
|
44
|
-
### Trunk (first cycle)
|
|
47
|
+
### Trunk (first cycle, v9)
|
|
45
48
|
|
|
46
49
|
```
|
|
47
|
-
/intuition-prompt →
|
|
48
|
-
|
|
49
|
-
/intuition-build → handoff → complete
|
|
50
|
+
/intuition-prompt → /intuition-outline → /intuition-assemble →
|
|
51
|
+
/intuition-detail → /intuition-build → /intuition-test → complete
|
|
50
52
|
```
|
|
51
53
|
|
|
52
54
|
Each handoff transition:
|
|
@@ -64,18 +66,9 @@ After trunk completes, run `/intuition-start` to:
|
|
|
64
66
|
|
|
65
67
|
Branches follow the same 5-phase workflow but read parent context for continuity.
|
|
66
68
|
|
|
67
|
-
###
|
|
69
|
+
### Detail Phase (v9)
|
|
68
70
|
|
|
69
|
-
The
|
|
70
|
-
1. Handoff generates a design brief for the first item
|
|
71
|
-
2. `/intuition-design` elaborates it using the ECD framework
|
|
72
|
-
3. Handoff checks for remaining items → loops back or advances to engineer
|
|
73
|
-
|
|
74
|
-
### Engineer → Build Split
|
|
75
|
-
|
|
76
|
-
- **Engineer** (opus, interactive) determines the code-level HOW: reads codebase via research subagents, discusses decisions with you, produces `code_specs.md`
|
|
77
|
-
- **Build** (sonnet, PM) implements against specs: delegates to Code Writer subagents, verifies with Code Reviewer, runs mandatory Security Expert review, produces `build_report.md`
|
|
78
|
-
- Build makes NO engineering decisions — it matches output to specs
|
|
71
|
+
The outline assesses every task by domain and depth. The assemble phase matches tasks to domain specialists. The detail phase runs each specialist through exploration → user gate → blueprint specification.
|
|
79
72
|
|
|
80
73
|
## Build Sub-Agents
|
|
81
74
|
|
|
@@ -5,13 +5,11 @@ This project uses a five-phase workflow coordinated by the Intuition system, wit
|
|
|
5
5
|
### Workflow Model
|
|
6
6
|
|
|
7
7
|
The Intuition workflow uses a trunk-and-branch model:
|
|
8
|
-
- **Trunk**: The first prompt→
|
|
8
|
+
- **Trunk**: The first prompt→outline→detail→build→test cycle. Represents the core vision.
|
|
9
9
|
- **Branches**: Subsequent cycles that build on, extend, or diverge from trunk or other branches.
|
|
10
10
|
- **Debugger**: Post-completion diagnostic specialist for hard problems.
|
|
11
11
|
|
|
12
|
-
|
|
13
|
-
`[/intuition-design loop]` → `/intuition-handoff` → `/intuition-engineer` → `/intuition-handoff` →
|
|
14
|
-
`/intuition-build` → `/intuition-handoff` → complete
|
|
12
|
+
v9 workflow: `/intuition-prompt` → `/intuition-outline` → `/intuition-assemble` → `/intuition-detail` → `/intuition-build` → `/intuition-test` → complete
|
|
15
13
|
|
|
16
14
|
After completion: `/intuition-start` to create branches or `/intuition-debugger` to debug issues.
|
|
17
15
|
|
|
@@ -36,29 +34,30 @@ The project follows a structured workflow with handoff transitions between phase
|
|
|
36
34
|
- Flags tasks requiring design exploration with rationale
|
|
37
35
|
- Output: `outline.md` with tasks, dependencies, risks, design recommendations
|
|
38
36
|
|
|
39
|
-
**
|
|
40
|
-
-
|
|
41
|
-
-
|
|
42
|
-
- Domain-agnostic: works for code, world building, UI, documents, or any creative/structural work
|
|
43
|
-
- Runs once per flagged item in a loop managed by handoff
|
|
44
|
-
- Output: Design specifications per item
|
|
37
|
+
**Assemble** — `/intuition-assemble`
|
|
38
|
+
- Matches outline tasks to domain specialists and format producers
|
|
39
|
+
- Writes team_assignment.json for the detail phase
|
|
45
40
|
|
|
46
|
-
**
|
|
47
|
-
-
|
|
48
|
-
-
|
|
49
|
-
- Output:
|
|
41
|
+
**Detail** — `/intuition-detail`
|
|
42
|
+
- Domain specialists produce detailed blueprints
|
|
43
|
+
- Stage 1 exploration → user gate → Stage 2 specification
|
|
44
|
+
- Output: Blueprints per specialist domain
|
|
50
45
|
|
|
51
46
|
**Build** — `/intuition-build`
|
|
52
|
-
- Delegates implementation to
|
|
47
|
+
- Delegates implementation to format producers, verifies against blueprints and acceptance criteria
|
|
53
48
|
- Mandatory security review before completion
|
|
54
|
-
-
|
|
55
|
-
|
|
49
|
+
- Output: `build_report.md` — task outcomes, files modified
|
|
50
|
+
|
|
51
|
+
**Test** — `/intuition-test`
|
|
52
|
+
- Post-build quality gate
|
|
53
|
+
- Designs test strategy, creates tests, runs fix cycles
|
|
54
|
+
- Output: `test_report.md`
|
|
56
55
|
|
|
57
56
|
**Session Primer** — `/intuition-start`
|
|
58
57
|
- Loads project context, detects workflow phase, suggests next step
|
|
59
58
|
- Run at the start of any session to get oriented
|
|
60
59
|
|
|
61
|
-
**Recommended Flow**: Prompt →
|
|
60
|
+
**Recommended Flow (v9)**: Prompt → Outline → Assemble → Detail → Build → Test → complete
|
|
62
61
|
|
|
63
62
|
Run `/clear` before each phase skill. After completion, run `/intuition-start` to create a branch or invoke `/intuition-debugger` to debug issues.
|
|
64
63
|
|
|
@@ -74,11 +73,11 @@ Run `/clear` before each phase skill. After completion, run `/intuition-start` t
|
|
|
74
73
|
**Phase Output Files** (created during workflow, in `{context_path}/`):
|
|
75
74
|
- **outline_brief.md** — Brief for outline phase (created by Handoff)
|
|
76
75
|
- **outline.md** — Structured project outline with design recommendations
|
|
77
|
-
- **
|
|
78
|
-
- **
|
|
79
|
-
- **
|
|
80
|
-
- **build_brief.md** — Brief for build phase (created by Handoff)
|
|
76
|
+
- **team_assignment.json** — Specialist/producer assignments (created by Assemble)
|
|
77
|
+
- **blueprints/** — Detailed blueprints per specialist (created by Detail)
|
|
78
|
+
- **build_brief.md** — Brief for build phase (created by Handoff, v8)
|
|
81
79
|
- **build_report.md** — Task outcomes and files modified (created by Build)
|
|
80
|
+
- **test_report.md** — Test results and coverage (created by Test)
|
|
82
81
|
|
|
83
82
|
### Memory-Aware Protocols
|
|
84
83
|
|
|
@@ -115,20 +114,17 @@ Run `/clear` before each phase skill. After completion, run `/intuition-start` t
|
|
|
115
114
|
**When user suggests outline work:**
|
|
116
115
|
- "This sounds like a good candidate for planning. Use `/intuition-handoff` to process the brief, then `/intuition-outline` to develop a structured approach."
|
|
117
116
|
|
|
118
|
-
**When
|
|
119
|
-
- "
|
|
120
|
-
|
|
121
|
-
**When design items are complete:**
|
|
122
|
-
- "All design specs are done! Use `/intuition-handoff` to prepare the engineering brief."
|
|
117
|
+
**When outline is ready:**
|
|
118
|
+
- "Outline looks ready! Use `/intuition-assemble` to match tasks to specialists."
|
|
123
119
|
|
|
124
|
-
**When
|
|
125
|
-
- "
|
|
120
|
+
**When assembly is complete:**
|
|
121
|
+
- "Team assigned! Use `/intuition-detail` to start the specialist blueprint phase."
|
|
126
122
|
|
|
127
|
-
**When
|
|
128
|
-
- "
|
|
129
|
-
|
|
130
|
-
**When user is ready to build:**
|
|
131
|
-
- "Build brief is ready! Use `/intuition-build` to kick off implementation."
|
|
123
|
+
**When detail is complete:**
|
|
124
|
+
- "Blueprints ready! Use `/intuition-build` to kick off implementation."
|
|
132
125
|
|
|
133
126
|
**When build is complete:**
|
|
127
|
+
- "Build done! Use `/intuition-test` to run the quality gate."
|
|
128
|
+
|
|
129
|
+
**When test is complete:**
|
|
134
130
|
- "Workflow cycle complete! Use `/intuition-start` to create a branch for new work, or `/intuition-debugger` to debug any issues."
|
|
@@ -1,26 +1,19 @@
|
|
|
1
1
|
# Intuition
|
|
2
2
|
|
|
3
|
-
A trunk-and-branch workflow system for Claude Code. Turns rough ideas into structured plans,
|
|
3
|
+
A trunk-and-branch workflow system for Claude Code. Turns rough ideas into structured plans, specialist-driven blueprints, and verified implementations through guided dialogue.
|
|
4
4
|
|
|
5
5
|
## Workflow
|
|
6
6
|
|
|
7
7
|
```
|
|
8
|
-
/intuition-prompt
|
|
9
|
-
|
|
10
|
-
|
|
11
|
-
|
|
12
|
-
/intuition-handoff → /intuition-engineer
|
|
13
|
-
↓
|
|
14
|
-
/intuition-build ← /intuition-handoff
|
|
15
|
-
↓
|
|
16
|
-
/intuition-handoff → complete
|
|
17
|
-
↓
|
|
18
|
-
/intuition-start → create branch or /intuition-debugger
|
|
8
|
+
/intuition-prompt → /intuition-outline → /intuition-assemble →
|
|
9
|
+
/intuition-detail → /intuition-build → /intuition-test → complete
|
|
10
|
+
↓
|
|
11
|
+
/intuition-start → create branch or /intuition-debugger
|
|
19
12
|
```
|
|
20
13
|
|
|
21
|
-
Run `/
|
|
14
|
+
Run `/clear` before each new phase skill to keep context clean.
|
|
22
15
|
|
|
23
|
-
The first
|
|
16
|
+
The first cycle is the **trunk**. After trunk completes, create **branches** for new features or changes. Use `/intuition-debugger` to investigate hard problems in any completed context.
|
|
24
17
|
|
|
25
18
|
## Skills
|
|
26
19
|
|
|
@@ -28,13 +21,16 @@ The first prompt→build cycle is the **trunk**. After trunk completes, create *
|
|
|
28
21
|
|-------|-------------|
|
|
29
22
|
| `/intuition-start` | Detects where you left off, shows project status, routes to next step or branch creation |
|
|
30
23
|
| `/intuition-prompt` | Sharpens a rough idea into a planning-ready brief through focused Q&A |
|
|
31
|
-
| `/intuition-outline` | Builds a strategic blueprint with tasks,
|
|
32
|
-
| `/intuition-
|
|
33
|
-
| `/intuition-
|
|
34
|
-
| `/intuition-build` | Delegates implementation to subagents, verifies against
|
|
24
|
+
| `/intuition-outline` | Builds a strategic blueprint with tasks, depth assessment, and domain classification |
|
|
25
|
+
| `/intuition-assemble` | Matches tasks to domain specialists and format producers |
|
|
26
|
+
| `/intuition-detail` | Domain specialists produce detailed blueprints through exploration and user gates |
|
|
27
|
+
| `/intuition-build` | Delegates implementation to subagents, verifies against blueprints and acceptance criteria |
|
|
28
|
+
| `/intuition-test` | Post-build quality gate — test strategy design and execution |
|
|
35
29
|
| `/intuition-debugger` | Expert debugger — diagnostic specialist for complex bugs, cross-context failures, performance issues |
|
|
36
|
-
| `/intuition-handoff` |
|
|
30
|
+
| `/intuition-handoff` | Branch creation, v8 state transitions, migrations |
|
|
37
31
|
| `/intuition-initialize` | Sets up project memory (you already ran this) |
|
|
32
|
+
| `/intuition-meander` | Thought partner — reason through problems collaboratively |
|
|
33
|
+
| `/intuition-think-tank` | Rapid expert-panel analysis of documents, ideas, or proposals |
|
|
38
34
|
|
|
39
35
|
## Quick Start
|
|
40
36
|
|
|
@@ -42,17 +38,13 @@ The first prompt→build cycle is the **trunk**. After trunk completes, create *
|
|
|
42
38
|
|
|
43
39
|
1. `/intuition-start` — see where you are
|
|
44
40
|
2. `/intuition-prompt` — describe what you want to build
|
|
45
|
-
3. `/intuition-
|
|
46
|
-
4. `/intuition-
|
|
47
|
-
5. `/intuition-
|
|
48
|
-
6. `/intuition-
|
|
49
|
-
7. `/intuition-
|
|
50
|
-
8. `/intuition-engineer` — create code specifications
|
|
51
|
-
9. `/intuition-handoff` — prepare for build
|
|
52
|
-
10. `/intuition-build` — implement and verify
|
|
53
|
-
11. `/intuition-handoff` — complete the cycle
|
|
41
|
+
3. `/intuition-outline` — create the blueprint
|
|
42
|
+
4. `/intuition-assemble` — match tasks to specialists
|
|
43
|
+
5. `/intuition-detail` — specialists produce blueprints
|
|
44
|
+
6. `/intuition-build` — implement and verify
|
|
45
|
+
7. `/intuition-test` — quality gate
|
|
54
46
|
|
|
55
|
-
|
|
47
|
+
Run `/clear` before each phase skill.
|
|
56
48
|
|
|
57
49
|
### After trunk completes (branches)
|
|
58
50
|
|