@tgoodington/intuition 7.1.0 → 8.0.1

This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
@@ -1,386 +0,0 @@
1
- # Architect Sub-Agents Reference
2
-
3
- ## Available Execution Sub-Agents
4
-
5
- Delegate to these specialized agents (all run on Sonnet by default):
6
-
7
- | Agent | Purpose | When to Use |
8
- |-------|---------|-------------|
9
- | **Code Writer** | Implements features, writes/edits code | New features, bug fixes, refactoring |
10
- | **Test Runner** | Executes tests, reports results | After code changes, CI verification |
11
- | **Documentation** | Updates docs, README, comments | After feature completion |
12
- | **Research** | Explores codebase, investigates issues | Unknown territory, debugging |
13
- | **Code Reviewer** | Reviews code quality | After Code Writer completes |
14
- | **Security Expert** | Scans for secrets, vulnerabilities | Before any commit (MANDATORY) |
15
- | **Technical Spec Writer** | Creates comprehensive technical specifications | After planning, before code implementation |
16
- | **Communications Specialist** | Creates human-centric audience-specific documents | When new human-facing docs are needed |
17
-
18
- ## Task Delegation Patterns
19
-
20
- ### Code Writer Delegation
21
-
22
- Use the Code Writer agent for implementing features and fixing bugs.
23
-
24
- **When to use:**
25
- - New feature implementation
26
- - Bug fixes
27
- - Code refactoring
28
- - Adding new modules or components
29
-
30
- **Example delegation:**
31
- ```
32
- Code Writer Task: Implement user authentication module
33
-
34
- Objective: Create a secure authentication system with login and registration
35
-
36
- Files to create/modify:
37
- - src/auth/auth.service.ts (new)
38
- - src/auth/auth.controller.ts (new)
39
- - src/auth/jwt.strategy.ts (new)
40
-
41
- Acceptance Criteria:
42
- - [ ] Login endpoint accepts email/password and returns JWT
43
- - [ ] Registration creates new user with hashed password
44
- - [ ] JWT validation works for protected routes
45
- - [ ] Password reset functionality implemented
46
-
47
- Constraints:
48
- - Use bcrypt for password hashing
49
- - Follow existing project code style
50
- - Include proper error handling
51
- ```
52
-
53
- ### Test Runner Delegation
54
-
55
- Use the Test Runner agent to execute tests and verify code quality.
56
-
57
- **When to use:**
58
- - After code changes to verify tests pass
59
- - Running full test suite
60
- - CI/CD integration verification
61
- - Regression testing
62
-
63
- **Example delegation:**
64
- ```
65
- Test Runner Task: Execute test suite for authentication module
66
-
67
- Objective: Verify all tests pass and no regressions introduced
68
-
69
- Acceptance Criteria:
70
- - [ ] All unit tests pass
71
- - [ ] All integration tests pass
72
- - [ ] Test coverage reported
73
- - [ ] No failing tests in full suite
74
-
75
- Files to test:
76
- - src/auth/* (authentication module)
77
- ```
78
-
79
- ### Documentation Delegation
80
-
81
- Use the Documentation agent to update docs and create reference materials.
82
-
83
- **When to use:**
84
- - After feature completion
85
- - Updating README with new capabilities
86
- - Adding API documentation
87
- - Creating usage examples
88
-
89
- **Example delegation:**
90
- ```
91
- Documentation Task: Update API documentation for authentication endpoints
92
-
93
- Objective: Document new authentication endpoints in API docs
94
-
95
- Acceptance Criteria:
96
- - [ ] Login endpoint documented with examples
97
- - [ ] Registration endpoint documented
98
- - [ ] Error responses documented
99
- - [ ] Authentication flow explained
100
- - [ ] Links are valid
101
-
102
- Files to update:
103
- - docs/api.md
104
- - docs/authentication.md (create if needed)
105
- - README.md (usage section)
106
- ```
107
-
108
- ### Research Delegation
109
-
110
- Use the Research agent to explore and understand the codebase.
111
-
112
- **When to use:**
113
- - Investigating unknown parts of codebase
114
- - Finding where to make changes
115
- - Understanding existing patterns
116
- - Debugging unknown issues
117
-
118
- **Example delegation:**
119
- ```
120
- Research Task: Investigate database connection handling
121
-
122
- Objective: Understand how database connections are currently managed
123
-
124
- Explore:
125
- - Where database initialization happens
126
- - How connection pooling is configured
127
- - What patterns are used for database queries
128
- - Error handling for connection failures
129
-
130
- Report findings and recommendations.
131
- ```
132
-
133
- ### Code Reviewer Delegation
134
-
135
- Use the Code Reviewer agent to review code quality and standards compliance.
136
-
137
- **When to use:**
138
- - After Code Writer completes implementation
139
- - Before merging to main branch
140
- - Ensuring code quality standards
141
- - Catching potential issues
142
-
143
- **Example delegation:**
144
- ```
145
- Code Reviewer Task: Review authentication module implementation
146
-
147
- Objective: Verify code quality and best practices
148
-
149
- Review criteria:
150
- - [ ] Code follows project style guide
151
- - [ ] Error handling is comprehensive
152
- - [ ] No code smells or anti-patterns
153
- - [ ] Documentation is complete
154
- - [ ] Tests are adequate
155
-
156
- Files to review:
157
- - src/auth/auth.service.ts
158
- - src/auth/auth.controller.ts
159
- - src/auth/jwt.strategy.ts
160
- ```
161
-
162
- ### Security Expert Delegation
163
-
164
- Use the Security Expert agent to scan for vulnerabilities and security issues. **This is MANDATORY before any code is committed.**
165
-
166
- **When to use:**
167
- - Before merging any code (MANDATORY)
168
- - Scanning for secrets in code
169
- - Verifying no hardcoded credentials
170
- - Checking for common vulnerabilities
171
- - Reviewing security-sensitive changes
172
-
173
- **Example delegation:**
174
- ```
175
- Security Expert Task: Security scan for authentication module
176
-
177
- Objective: Verify no security vulnerabilities or secrets in code
178
-
179
- Check for:
180
- - [ ] No hardcoded secrets or credentials
181
- - [ ] No sensitive data in logs
182
- - [ ] No common authentication vulnerabilities
183
- - [ ] Proper input validation
184
- - [ ] Secure password handling
185
- - [ ] JWT security best practices
186
-
187
- Files to scan:
188
- - src/auth/* (entire authentication module)
189
- - src/config/* (configuration files)
190
- ```
191
-
192
- ## Technical Spec Writer Delegation
193
-
194
- Use the Technical Spec Writer agent to create detailed technical specifications before implementation begins.
195
-
196
- **When to use:**
197
- - After planning phase, before code implementation
198
- - When feature complexity requires clear specification
199
- - To prevent implementation rework from unclear requirements
200
- - When multiple developers/teams need shared understanding
201
- - To document architectural decisions and trade-offs
202
-
203
- **Example delegation:**
204
- ```
205
- Technical Spec Writer Task: Create specification for user authentication feature
206
-
207
- Objective: Create comprehensive technical specification for authentication implementation
208
-
209
- Source Materials:
210
- - Plan from Waldo planning phase
211
- - Existing authentication patterns in codebase
212
- - Security requirements and compliance needs
213
-
214
- Specification should include:
215
- - [ ] API endpoint specifications (methods, paths, request/response formats)
216
- - [ ] Data model and schema design
217
- - [ ] Authentication flow diagram
218
- - [ ] Error handling and edge cases
219
- - [ ] Performance requirements
220
- - [ ] Security considerations
221
- - [ ] Integration points with existing systems
222
- - [ ] Acceptance criteria for implementation
223
-
224
- Output Location: docs/specs/authentication-spec.md
225
- ```
226
-
227
- **Output:**
228
- - Detailed technical specification in `docs/specs/` directory
229
- - Human-facing documentation for developer reference
230
- - NOT part of project memory system
231
- - Ready for Code Writer to implement with clarity
232
-
233
- ## Communications Specialist Delegation
234
-
235
- Use the Communications Specialist agent to create human-centric documents from technical specifications when different audiences need tailored information.
236
-
237
- **When to use:**
238
- - When creating getting-started guides from technical specs
239
- - When translating technical features into user-facing documentation
240
- - When creating executive summaries or business value docs
241
- - When different audiences (users, developers, stakeholders) need different versions
242
- - When existing technical docs need an accessible companion guide
243
-
244
- **NOT when to use:**
245
- - Modifying existing technical specifications
246
- - Creating marketing materials
247
- - Post-processing existing documentation
248
- - Single-audience technical documents (use Documentation agent instead)
249
-
250
- **Example delegation:**
251
- ```
252
- Communications Specialist Task: Create user-facing guide from technical authentication spec
253
-
254
- Objective: Create getting-started guide for end-users based on technical spec
255
-
256
- Source Material:
257
- - docs/specs/authentication-spec.md (technical specification)
258
- - Existing user guides for reference on tone/style
259
-
260
- Audience: End users (non-technical)
261
-
262
- Create NEW document including:
263
- - [ ] Overview of what authentication does (for users)
264
- - [ ] Step-by-step guide for users to authenticate
265
- - [ ] Common tasks and how to do them
266
- - [ ] Troubleshooting common issues
267
- - [ ] When to contact support
268
- - [ ] Link to advanced/developer documentation
269
-
270
- Output Location: docs/guides/authentication-user-guide.md
271
- ```
272
-
273
- **Output:**
274
- - NEW human-facing document in appropriate location
275
- - Emits `[DOCUMENT: communication]` flag
276
- - NOT a modification of technical spec
277
- - Accessible language, audience-appropriate tone
278
-
279
- ## Dynamic Sub-Agent Discovery
280
-
281
- When executing a plan that requires a specialized agent type not in the above list, you can discover and employ new agent archetypes:
282
-
283
- **Process:**
284
- 1. Identify the need: "I need [deployment/monitoring/performance/etc] expertise"
285
- 2. Request Research agent to find best practices for that agent type
286
- 3. Document findings in `docs/intuition-framework-improvements.md` with date, archetype needed, and best practices found
287
- 4. Use findings to adapt task for existing agent OR clearly describe need for base Claude to implement framework-wide
288
-
289
- **Example:** If executing a plan involving infrastructure deployment, delegate to Research to investigate deployment agent patterns. Research finds CI/CD and infrastructure-as-code best practices. Document in framework-improvements.md. Use findings to adapt Code Writer instructions OR describe deployment need for future framework adoption.
290
-
291
- ## Parallel Task Delegation Patterns
292
-
293
- ### Pattern 1: Multiple Code Writers (Different Files)
294
-
295
- When implementing features across different files with no dependencies:
296
-
297
- ```
298
- Task 1: Code Writer - Implement User model (models/user.ts)
299
- Task 2: Code Writer - Implement Order model (models/order.ts)
300
- Task 3: Code Writer - Implement Product model (models/product.ts)
301
- ```
302
-
303
- **Why parallel?** Different files, no dependencies, all create similar models.
304
-
305
- ### Pattern 2: Code + Documentation
306
-
307
- After a code change is complete, run testing and documentation in parallel:
308
-
309
- ```
310
- Task 1: Test Runner - Run test suite
311
- Task 2: Documentation - Update API documentation
312
- ```
313
-
314
- **Why parallel?** Documentation doesn't need test results; both reference the completed code.
315
-
316
- ### Pattern 3: Multiple Research Tasks
317
-
318
- Exploring different areas of unknown codebase:
319
-
320
- ```
321
- Task 1: Research - Investigate authentication implementation
322
- Task 2: Research - Investigate database schema design
323
- Task 3: Research - Investigate API routing structure
324
- ```
325
-
326
- **Why parallel?** Each explores independent area; results combine for full picture.
327
-
328
- ### Pattern 4: Multi-Component Feature
329
-
330
- Implementing a feature with clear component boundaries:
331
-
332
- ```
333
- Task 1: Code Writer - Add frontend form component (components/UserForm.tsx)
334
- Task 2: Code Writer - Add backend API endpoint (routes/users.ts)
335
- Task 3: Code Writer - Add database migration (migrations/001_add_users.sql)
336
- ```
337
-
338
- **Why parallel?** If the interface is pre-defined, each can be implemented independently.
339
-
340
- ## Sequential Task Patterns
341
-
342
- ### Pattern 1: Code Then Verify
343
-
344
- Code must be written before it can be tested:
345
-
346
- ```
347
- Task 1: Code Writer - Implement feature
348
- [Wait for completion]
349
- Task 2: Test Runner - Run tests
350
- [Wait for completion]
351
- Task 3: Code Reviewer - Review code
352
- [Wait for completion]
353
- Task 4: Security Expert - Security scan
354
- ```
355
-
356
- ### Pattern 2: Exploration Then Implementation
357
-
358
- Must understand codebase before implementing changes:
359
-
360
- ```
361
- Task 1: Research - Investigate authentication patterns
362
- [Wait for findings]
363
- Task 2: Code Writer - Implement new authentication method (informed by research)
364
- ```
365
-
366
- ### Pattern 3: Verification Before Security Scan
367
-
368
- Security Expert reviews code that exists:
369
-
370
- ```
371
- Task 1: Code Writer - Implement changes
372
- [Wait for completion]
373
- Task 2: Security Expert - Scan for vulnerabilities (MANDATORY)
374
- ```
375
-
376
- ## Delegation Checklist
377
-
378
- Before delegating a task, ensure:
379
-
380
- - [ ] **Clear objective** - What should the agent accomplish?
381
- - [ ] **Context provided** - What information does the agent need?
382
- - [ ] **Acceptance criteria** - How will I know it's complete?
383
- - [ ] **Files specified** - What files should be modified?
384
- - [ ] **Constraints listed** - What limitations apply?
385
- - [ ] **Failure strategy** - What if something goes wrong?
386
- - [ ] **Dependencies resolved** - Does the agent have what it needs?
@@ -1,323 +0,0 @@
1
- # Execution Report Format
2
-
3
- ## Overview
4
-
5
- When execution is complete, provide a comprehensive report demonstrating what was accomplished and verifying all quality gates have been met.
6
-
7
- ## Complete Execution Report Format
8
-
9
- ```markdown
10
- ## Execution Complete
11
-
12
- **Plan:** [Plan title]
13
- **Status:** Success / Partial / Failed
14
-
15
- **Tasks Completed:**
16
- - [x] Task 1 - [Brief outcome]
17
- - [x] Task 2 - [Brief outcome]
18
-
19
- **Verification Results:**
20
- - Security Review: PASS
21
- - Code Review: PASS (if applicable)
22
- - Tests: X passed, Y failed (if applicable)
23
-
24
- **Files Modified:**
25
- - path/to/file.ts - [what changed]
26
-
27
- **Issues Encountered:**
28
- - [Any problems and how they were resolved]
29
-
30
- **Recommendations:**
31
- - [Follow-up items or suggestions]
32
- ```
33
-
34
- ## Section Details
35
-
36
- ### Plan Header
37
-
38
- **Plan Title:** Exactly as presented to user
39
- **Status:** One of:
40
- - **Success**: All tasks completed successfully, all quality gates passed
41
- - **Partial**: Some tasks completed, some failed but escalated/handled appropriately
42
- - **Failed**: Plan could not be executed, escalated to user
43
-
44
- **Example:**
45
- ```markdown
46
- ## Execution Complete
47
-
48
- **Plan:** Add Real-Time Notifications Feature
49
- **Status:** Success
50
- ```
51
-
52
- ### Tasks Completed
53
-
54
- List all tasks with outcomes. Use checkbox format to show completion status.
55
-
56
- **Format:**
57
- ```markdown
58
- **Tasks Completed:**
59
- - [x] Task 1 - Brief description of what was accomplished
60
- - [x] Task 2 - Brief description of what was accomplished
61
- - [ ] Task 3 - Was not completed (explain why)
62
- ```
63
-
64
- **Example:**
65
- ```markdown
66
- **Tasks Completed:**
67
- - [x] Task 1 - Create Notification model and database schema
68
- - [x] Task 2 - Implement WebSocket server for real-time updates
69
- - [x] Task 3 - Add notification API endpoints (create, list, mark as read)
70
- - [x] Task 4 - Implement frontend notification components
71
- - [x] Task 5 - Add unit tests for notification service
72
- ```
73
-
74
- ### Verification Results
75
-
76
- Report results of all verification activities. Include results of:
77
- - **Security Review**: Mandatory - PASS or FAIL
78
- - **Code Review**: If code was written
79
- - **Tests**: If tests were run
80
-
81
- **Format:**
82
- ```markdown
83
- **Verification Results:**
84
- - Security Review: PASS
85
- - Code Review: PASS (no issues found, follows project conventions)
86
- - Tests: 45 passed, 0 failed, 2 skipped
87
- ```
88
-
89
- **Details to include:**
90
- - Security Review: Any issues found? Remediated?
91
- - Code Review: Code quality assessment, any improvements suggested?
92
- - Tests: Coverage percentage, any failing tests, regressions?
93
-
94
- **Example:**
95
- ```markdown
96
- **Verification Results:**
97
- - Security Review: PASS - No hardcoded secrets, input validation verified, password hashing secure
98
- - Code Review: PASS - Code follows TypeScript conventions, error handling comprehensive, documentation complete
99
- - Tests: 52 passed, 0 failed, 1 skipped - Coverage: 89% for auth module
100
- ```
101
-
102
- ### Files Modified
103
-
104
- List all files that were created or modified. Include brief description of changes.
105
-
106
- **Format:**
107
- ```markdown
108
- **Files Modified:**
109
- - src/auth/auth.service.ts - Created new service with login/register functions
110
- - src/auth/auth.controller.ts - Created new controller with POST endpoints
111
- - src/app.module.ts - Added AuthModule import and JWT configuration
112
- - src/__tests__/auth.spec.ts - Created test suite with 15 test cases
113
- ```
114
-
115
- **Best Practices:**
116
- - Include created files (mark as "Created:" or "New:")
117
- - Include modified files with brief change description
118
- - Include deleted files if any (mark as "Deleted:")
119
- - Use relative paths from project root
120
-
121
- **Example:**
122
- ```markdown
123
- **Files Modified:**
124
- - src/notifications/notifications.model.ts (Created) - Notification entity with user and timestamp fields
125
- - src/notifications/notifications.service.ts (Created) - Service with CRUD operations
126
- - src/notifications/notifications.controller.ts (Created) - REST API endpoints
127
- - src/notifications/notifications.gateway.ts (Created) - WebSocket gateway for real-time updates
128
- - src/notifications/__tests__/notifications.service.spec.ts (Created) - 15 unit tests
129
- - src/app.module.ts (Modified) - Added NotificationsModule and WebSocketGateway configuration
130
- - docs/api.md (Modified) - Added notification endpoints documentation
131
- - package.json (Modified) - Added @nestjs/websockets dependency
132
- ```
133
-
134
- ### Issues Encountered
135
-
136
- Document any problems that occurred and how they were resolved.
137
-
138
- **Format:**
139
- ```markdown
140
- **Issues Encountered:**
141
- - Issue 1: [Description] - Resolution: [How it was fixed]
142
- - Issue 2: [Description] - Resolution: [How it was fixed]
143
- ```
144
-
145
- **When to include:**
146
- - Any task failures that were retried
147
- - Fallbacks that were used
148
- - Unexpected complications
149
- - Workarounds implemented
150
- - Assumptions that proved incorrect
151
-
152
- **When NOT to include:**
153
- - Minor warnings or notices
154
- - Expected temporary debug output
155
- - Normal task execution messages
156
-
157
- **Example:**
158
- ```markdown
159
- **Issues Encountered:**
160
- - WebSocket test failures due to timing issues - Resolution: Added proper async/await and increased timeout delays
161
- - Database migration failed first attempt - Resolution: Checked existing tables, updated migration script, re-ran successfully
162
- - Initial code review requested refactoring - Resolution: Code Writer updated to follow patterns, re-reviewed and approved
163
- ```
164
-
165
- ### Recommendations
166
-
167
- Suggest follow-up items, improvements, or next steps.
168
-
169
- **Categories:**
170
- - **Follow-up tasks**: Work that should happen next
171
- - **Improvements**: Enhancements for existing code
172
- - **Testing**: Additional testing needed
173
- - **Documentation**: Further documentation needed
174
- - **Optimization**: Performance or maintainability improvements
175
- - **Future phases**: What should be done next
176
-
177
- **Example:**
178
- ```markdown
179
- **Recommendations:**
180
- - Next: Implement push notifications to mobile app
181
- - Next: Add notification preferences/settings UI
182
- - Improvement: Add caching for notification queries (performance optimization)
183
- - Testing: Add end-to-end tests for notification flow
184
- - Documentation: Create user guide for notification preferences feature
185
- - Follow-up: Monitor WebSocket connection stability in production
186
- ```
187
-
188
- ## Report Sections for Different Scenarios
189
-
190
- ### Successful Execution (All Tasks Passed)
191
-
192
- ```markdown
193
- ## Execution Complete
194
-
195
- **Plan:** Add Real-Time Notifications
196
- **Status:** Success
197
-
198
- All 5 tasks completed successfully. All quality gates passed.
199
-
200
- **Tasks Completed:**
201
- - [x] Task 1 - Create notification models and schema
202
- - [x] Task 2 - Implement WebSocket server
203
- - [x] Task 3 - Build notification API endpoints
204
- - [x] Task 4 - Create frontend components
205
- - [x] Task 5 - Add comprehensive tests
206
-
207
- **Verification Results:**
208
- - Security Review: PASS - No vulnerabilities found
209
- - Code Review: PASS - High quality, well-documented
210
- - Tests: 48 passed, 0 failed - 91% coverage
211
-
212
- **Files Modified:**
213
- - src/notifications/ (Created) - Full notification module
214
- - src/app.module.ts (Modified) - Added NotificationsModule
215
- - docs/api.md (Modified) - Added API documentation
216
-
217
- **Issues Encountered:**
218
- None - smooth execution throughout.
219
-
220
- **Recommendations:**
221
- - Monitor WebSocket connection performance in production
222
- - Plan for notification preferences feature in next phase
223
- - Consider adding read receipts for notifications
224
- ```
225
-
226
- ### Partial Execution (Some Issues Resolved)
227
-
228
- ```markdown
229
- ## Execution Complete
230
-
231
- **Plan:** Add Real-Time Notifications
232
- **Status:** Partial
233
-
234
- 4 of 5 tasks completed. 1 task required escalation.
235
-
236
- **Tasks Completed:**
237
- - [x] Task 1 - Create notification models and schema
238
- - [x] Task 2 - Implement WebSocket server
239
- - [x] Task 3 - Build notification API endpoints
240
- - [x] Task 4 - Create frontend components
241
- - [ ] Task 5 - Add comprehensive tests (Escalated)
242
-
243
- **Verification Results:**
244
- - Security Review: PASS - No vulnerabilities found
245
- - Code Review: PASS - Minor improvements suggested, implemented
246
- - Tests: 32 passed, 0 failed - 76% coverage (incomplete)
247
-
248
- **Files Modified:**
249
- - src/notifications/ (Created) - Core notification module
250
- - src/app.module.ts (Modified) - Added NotificationsModule
251
- - docs/api.md (Modified) - Added API documentation
252
-
253
- **Issues Encountered:**
254
- - Test environment setup required additional configuration - Resolved by researching and configuring WebSocket test utilities
255
- - Code review requested refactoring of error handling - Resolved in second iteration
256
- - Task 5 requires integration testing setup beyond scope - Escalated to user for prioritization
257
-
258
- **Recommendations:**
259
- - Task 5 (integration tests) should be scheduled separately as dedicated task
260
- - Production monitoring setup should be planned before deployment
261
- - Plan for notification preferences as follow-up feature
262
- ```
263
-
264
- ### Failed Execution (Major Issues)
265
-
266
- ```markdown
267
- ## Execution Complete
268
-
269
- **Plan:** Add Real-Time Notifications
270
- **Status:** Failed
271
-
272
- Plan execution halted due to architectural concerns. Escalated to user.
273
-
274
- **Tasks Completed:**
275
- - [x] Task 1 - Create notification models and schema
276
- - [ ] Task 2 - Implement WebSocket server (Not Started)
277
- - [ ] Task 3 - Build notification API endpoints (Not Started)
278
- - [ ] Task 4 - Create frontend components (Not Started)
279
- - [ ] Task 5 - Add comprehensive tests (Not Started)
280
-
281
- **Verification Results:**
282
- - Task 1 schema review passed
283
- - Architecture review for WebSocket revealed compatibility issues
284
-
285
- **Files Modified:**
286
- - src/notifications/notification.model.ts (Created)
287
-
288
- **Issues Encountered:**
289
- - Database schema implementation raised architectural questions about scalability
290
- - WebSocket approach may conflict with current load balancing strategy
291
- - Security Expert identified potential concerns with real-time message handling
292
- - Plan assumptions about system load capacity need validation
293
-
294
- **Recommendations:**
295
- - Conduct architecture review with team before proceeding
296
- - Verify WebSocket compatibility with current deployment infrastructure
297
- - Revisit scalability assumptions in plan
298
- - User input needed on approach before execution continues
299
- ```
300
-
301
- ## Quality Gate Verification Checklist
302
-
303
- Before submitting execution report, verify:
304
-
305
- ### Mandatory Gates
306
- - [ ] All tasks completed or properly escalated
307
- - [ ] Security Expert has reviewed (NO EXCEPTIONS)
308
- - [ ] All acceptance criteria verified or documented as incomplete
309
-
310
- ### If Code Was Written
311
- - [ ] Code Reviewer has approved
312
- - [ ] Tests pass (or documented why)
313
- - [ ] No regressions introduced
314
-
315
- ### If Docs Were Updated
316
- - [ ] Documentation is accurate
317
- - [ ] Links are valid
318
-
319
- ### Report Quality
320
- - [ ] Report is complete and accurate
321
- - [ ] All files listed and described
322
- - [ ] Issues and resolutions documented
323
- - [ ] Recommendations are actionable