@tgoodington/intuition 11.4.0 → 11.5.1

This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
Files changed (131) hide show
  1. package/package.json +1 -2
  2. package/skills/intuition-enuncia-compose/SKILL.md +5 -10
  3. package/skills/intuition-enuncia-design/SKILL.md +0 -4
  4. package/skills/intuition-enuncia-discovery/SKILL.md +1 -7
  5. package/skills/intuition-enuncia-execute/SKILL.md +0 -4
  6. package/skills/intuition-enuncia-handoff/SKILL.md +0 -4
  7. package/skills/intuition-enuncia-initialize/references/claude_template.md +20 -0
  8. package/skills/intuition-enuncia-start/SKILL.md +0 -4
  9. package/skills/intuition-enuncia-verify/SKILL.md +0 -4
  10. package/docs/archive/ARCHITECTURE_OVERVIEW.txt +0 -405
  11. package/docs/archive/INSTALLATION.md +0 -431
  12. package/docs/archive/PROJECT_CONTEXT.md +0 -361
  13. package/docs/archive/QUICK_TEST_CHECKLIST.md +0 -467
  14. package/docs/archive/SKILL_INTERACTION_GUIDE.md +0 -993
  15. package/docs/archive/TESTING_README.md +0 -215
  16. package/docs/archive/TESTING_SUMMARY.md +0 -781
  17. package/docs/archive/WALDO_V3_COMPLETE_DOCUMENTATION.md +0 -538
  18. package/docs/archive/WALDO_V3_DESIGN_SUMMARY.md +0 -449
  19. package/docs/archive/intuition-architecture.md +0 -342
  20. package/docs/archive/intuition-workflow.md +0 -210
  21. package/docs/archive/intuition_design_skill_spec.md +0 -219
  22. package/docs/archive/v7_design_spec.md +0 -1111
  23. package/docs/archive/v7_plan.md +0 -339
  24. package/docs/archive/v9-design/decision-framework-direction.md +0 -142
  25. package/docs/archive/v9-design/decision-framework-implementation.md +0 -114
  26. package/docs/archive/v9-design/domain-adaptive-team-architecture.md +0 -1016
  27. package/docs/archive/v9-test/SESSION_SUMMARY.md +0 -117
  28. package/docs/archive/v9-test/TEST_PLAN.md +0 -119
  29. package/docs/archive/v9-test/blueprints/legal-analyst.md +0 -166
  30. package/docs/archive/v9-test/output/07_cover_letter.md +0 -41
  31. package/docs/archive/v9-test/phase2/mock_plan.md +0 -89
  32. package/docs/archive/v9-test/phase2/producers.json +0 -32
  33. package/docs/archive/v9-test/phase2/specialists/database-architect.specialist.md +0 -10
  34. package/docs/archive/v9-test/phase2/specialists/financial-analyst.specialist.md +0 -10
  35. package/docs/archive/v9-test/phase2/specialists/legal-analyst.specialist.md +0 -10
  36. package/docs/archive/v9-test/phase2/specialists/technical-writer.specialist.md +0 -10
  37. package/docs/archive/v9-test/phase2/team_assignment.json +0 -61
  38. package/docs/archive/v9-test/phase3/blueprints/legal-analyst.md +0 -840
  39. package/docs/archive/v9-test/phase3/legal-analyst-full.specialist.md +0 -111
  40. package/docs/archive/v9-test/phase3/project_context/nh_landlord_tenant_notes.md +0 -35
  41. package/docs/archive/v9-test/phase3/project_context/property_facts.md +0 -32
  42. package/docs/archive/v9-test/phase3b/blueprints/legal-analyst.md +0 -1715
  43. package/docs/archive/v9-test/phase3b/legal-analyst.specialist.md +0 -153
  44. package/docs/archive/v9-test/phase3b/scratch/legal-analyst-stage1.md +0 -270
  45. package/docs/archive/v9-test/phase4/TEST_PLAN.md +0 -32
  46. package/docs/archive/v9-test/phase4/blueprints/financial-analyst-T2.md +0 -538
  47. package/docs/archive/v9-test/phase4/blueprints/legal-analyst-T4.md +0 -253
  48. package/docs/archive/v9-test/phase4/cross-blueprint-check.md +0 -280
  49. package/docs/archive/v9-test/phase4/scratch/financial-analyst-T2-stage1.md +0 -67
  50. package/docs/archive/v9-test/phase4/scratch/legal-analyst-T4-stage1.md +0 -54
  51. package/docs/archive/v9-test/phase4/specialists/financial-analyst.specialist.md +0 -156
  52. package/docs/archive/v9-test/phase4/specialists/legal-analyst.specialist.md +0 -153
  53. package/docs/archive/v9-test/phase5/TEST_PLAN.md +0 -35
  54. package/docs/archive/v9-test/phase5/blueprints/code-architect-hw-vetter.md +0 -375
  55. package/docs/archive/v9-test/phase5/output/04_compliance_checklist.md +0 -149
  56. package/docs/archive/v9-test/phase5/output/hardware-vetter-SKILL-v2.md +0 -561
  57. package/docs/archive/v9-test/phase5/output/hardware-vetter-SKILL.md +0 -459
  58. package/docs/archive/v9-test/phase5/producers/code-writer.producer.md +0 -49
  59. package/docs/archive/v9-test/phase5/producers/document-writer.producer.md +0 -62
  60. package/docs/archive/v9-test/phase5/regression-comparison-v2.md +0 -60
  61. package/docs/archive/v9-test/phase5/regression-comparison.md +0 -197
  62. package/docs/archive/v9-test/phase5/review-5A-specialist.md +0 -213
  63. package/docs/archive/v9-test/phase5/specialist-test/TEST_PLAN.md +0 -60
  64. package/docs/archive/v9-test/phase5/specialist-test/blueprint-comparison.md +0 -252
  65. package/docs/archive/v9-test/phase5/specialist-test/blueprints/code-architect-hw-vetter.md +0 -916
  66. package/docs/archive/v9-test/phase5/specialist-test/scratch/code-architect-stage1.md +0 -427
  67. package/docs/archive/v9-test/phase5/specialists/code-architect.specialist.md +0 -168
  68. package/docs/archive/v9-test/phase5b/TEST_PLAN.md +0 -219
  69. package/docs/archive/v9-test/phase5b/blueprints/5B-10-stage2-with-decisions.md +0 -286
  70. package/docs/archive/v9-test/phase5b/decisions/5B-2-accept-all-decisions.json +0 -68
  71. package/docs/archive/v9-test/phase5b/decisions/5B-3-promote-decisions.json +0 -70
  72. package/docs/archive/v9-test/phase5b/decisions/5B-4-individual-decisions.json +0 -68
  73. package/docs/archive/v9-test/phase5b/decisions/5B-5-triage-decisions.json +0 -110
  74. package/docs/archive/v9-test/phase5b/decisions/5B-6-fallback-decisions.json +0 -40
  75. package/docs/archive/v9-test/phase5b/decisions/5B-8-partial-decisions.json +0 -46
  76. package/docs/archive/v9-test/phase5b/decisions/5B-9-complete-decisions.json +0 -54
  77. package/docs/archive/v9-test/phase5b/scratch/code-architect-stage1.md +0 -133
  78. package/docs/archive/v9-test/phase5b/specialists/code-architect.specialist.md +0 -202
  79. package/docs/archive/v9-test/phase5b/stage1-many-decisions.md +0 -139
  80. package/docs/archive/v9-test/phase5b/stage1-no-assumptions.md +0 -70
  81. package/docs/archive/v9-test/phase5b/stage1-with-assumptions.md +0 -86
  82. package/docs/archive/v9-test/phase5b/test-5B-1-results.md +0 -157
  83. package/docs/archive/v9-test/phase5b/test-5B-10-results.md +0 -130
  84. package/docs/archive/v9-test/phase5b/test-5B-2-results.md +0 -75
  85. package/docs/archive/v9-test/phase5b/test-5B-3-results.md +0 -104
  86. package/docs/archive/v9-test/phase5b/test-5B-4-results.md +0 -114
  87. package/docs/archive/v9-test/phase5b/test-5B-5-results.md +0 -126
  88. package/docs/archive/v9-test/phase5b/test-5B-6-results.md +0 -60
  89. package/docs/archive/v9-test/phase5b/test-5B-7-results.md +0 -141
  90. package/docs/archive/v9-test/phase5b/test-5B-8-results.md +0 -115
  91. package/docs/archive/v9-test/phase5b/test-5B-9-results.md +0 -76
  92. package/docs/archive/v9-test/producers/document-writer.producer.md +0 -62
  93. package/docs/archive/v9-test/specialists/legal-analyst.specialist.md +0 -58
  94. package/docs/project_notes/.project-memory-state.json +0 -100
  95. package/docs/project_notes/archive/trunk-v9.2-complete/.gitkeep +0 -0
  96. package/docs/project_notes/archive/trunk-v9.2-complete/.planning_research/decision_file_naming.md +0 -15
  97. package/docs/project_notes/archive/trunk-v9.2-complete/.planning_research/decisions_log.md +0 -32
  98. package/docs/project_notes/archive/trunk-v9.2-complete/.planning_research/orientation.md +0 -51
  99. package/docs/project_notes/archive/trunk-v9.2-complete/audit/plan-rename-hitlist.md +0 -654
  100. package/docs/project_notes/archive/trunk-v9.2-complete/blueprint-conflicts.md +0 -109
  101. package/docs/project_notes/archive/trunk-v9.2-complete/blueprints/database-architect.md +0 -416
  102. package/docs/project_notes/archive/trunk-v9.2-complete/blueprints/devops-infrastructure.md +0 -514
  103. package/docs/project_notes/archive/trunk-v9.2-complete/blueprints/technical-writer.md +0 -788
  104. package/docs/project_notes/archive/trunk-v9.2-complete/build_brief.md +0 -119
  105. package/docs/project_notes/archive/trunk-v9.2-complete/build_report.md +0 -250
  106. package/docs/project_notes/archive/trunk-v9.2-complete/detail_brief.md +0 -94
  107. package/docs/project_notes/archive/trunk-v9.2-complete/plan.md +0 -182
  108. package/docs/project_notes/archive/trunk-v9.2-complete/planning_brief.md +0 -96
  109. package/docs/project_notes/archive/trunk-v9.2-complete/prompt_brief.md +0 -60
  110. package/docs/project_notes/archive/trunk-v9.2-complete/prompt_output.json +0 -98
  111. package/docs/project_notes/archive/trunk-v9.2-complete/scratch/database-architect-decisions.json +0 -72
  112. package/docs/project_notes/archive/trunk-v9.2-complete/scratch/database-architect-research-plan.md +0 -10
  113. package/docs/project_notes/archive/trunk-v9.2-complete/scratch/database-architect-stage1.md +0 -226
  114. package/docs/project_notes/archive/trunk-v9.2-complete/scratch/devops-infrastructure-decisions.json +0 -71
  115. package/docs/project_notes/archive/trunk-v9.2-complete/scratch/devops-infrastructure-research-plan.md +0 -7
  116. package/docs/project_notes/archive/trunk-v9.2-complete/scratch/devops-infrastructure-stage1.md +0 -164
  117. package/docs/project_notes/archive/trunk-v9.2-complete/scratch/technical-writer-decisions.json +0 -88
  118. package/docs/project_notes/archive/trunk-v9.2-complete/scratch/technical-writer-research-plan.md +0 -7
  119. package/docs/project_notes/archive/trunk-v9.2-complete/scratch/technical-writer-stage1.md +0 -266
  120. package/docs/project_notes/archive/trunk-v9.2-complete/team_assignment.json +0 -108
  121. package/docs/project_notes/archive/trunk-v9.2-complete/test_brief.md +0 -75
  122. package/docs/project_notes/archive/trunk-v9.2-complete/test_report.md +0 -26
  123. package/docs/project_notes/archive/trunk-v9.2-complete/verification/devops-infrastructure-verification.md +0 -172
  124. package/docs/project_notes/branches/.gitkeep +0 -0
  125. package/docs/project_notes/bugs.md +0 -41
  126. package/docs/project_notes/decisions.md +0 -147
  127. package/docs/project_notes/issues.md +0 -101
  128. package/docs/project_notes/key_facts.md +0 -88
  129. package/docs/project_notes/trunk/.gitkeep +0 -0
  130. package/docs/project_notes/trunk/discovery_brief.md +0 -40
  131. package/docs/project_notes/v9.2-optimization-plan.md +0 -193
@@ -1,449 +0,0 @@
1
- # Waldo v3 - Design Summary
2
-
3
- ## What Was Changed
4
-
5
- Waldo has been completely redesigned from an interrogator/interviewer model to a **research-informed thinking partnership** model. This document confirms the implementation against your requirements.
6
-
7
- ---
8
-
9
- ## Your Requirements vs. Implementation
10
-
11
- ### Requirement 1: "I want a thinking partner, not someone asking good questions"
12
-
13
- **Implementation:**
14
- - ✅ **Philosophy shifted** - Waldo is now a "wise confidant who has done homework beforehand"
15
- - ✅ **Research-first approach** - Waldo researches the domain immediately (best practices, pitfalls, alternatives)
16
- - ✅ **Perspective-bringing** - Waldo brings knowledge to the conversation, not neutrality
17
- - ✅ **Collaborative thinking** - "We think together" model, not extraction model
18
-
19
- **Key quote from waldo_core.md:**
20
- > "You don't extract information—you're a wise confidant who has done homework beforehand, brings perspective on best practices and common pitfalls, and helps users expand their own thinking through genuine 'yes, and...' collaboration."
21
-
22
- ---
23
-
24
- ### Requirement 2: "Use 'yes, and...' paradigm - build on ideas, don't challenge"
25
-
26
- **Implementation:**
27
- - ✅ **"Yes, and..." pattern documented** - Explicit AskUserQuestion pattern for "Building on Their Ideas"
28
- - ✅ **Never negate** - Pattern explicitly states "You accept their framing (yes), expand it with knowledge (and), don't negate or redirect"
29
- - ✅ **Expansive, not reductive** - All dialogue is about expanding their thinking, not critiquing it
30
- - ✅ **Tone enforcement** - Waldo's voice includes "Building, not judging" and explicitly avoids "Validating every answer"
31
-
32
- **From waldo_core.md, AskUserQuestion Pattern:**
33
- ```
34
- "You're thinking about [their approach]. In that direction,
35
- one thing I've seen matter is [insight from research]. How are you
36
- thinking about [that aspect]?"
37
-
38
- This is "yes, and..." in action:
39
- - You accept their framing (yes)
40
- - You expand it with knowledge (and)
41
- - You don't negate or redirect
42
- ```
43
-
44
- ---
45
-
46
- ### Requirement 3: "Cross-sector capability through context gathering on the fly"
47
-
48
- **Implementation:**
49
- - ✅ **Context gathering first** - Opening AskUserQuestion asks "What do you want to explore today?" with domain-agnostic options
50
- - ✅ **Dynamic research** - Research tasks dynamically reference user's domain and goal
51
- - ✅ **Adaptive tone** - Different tones for "build", "problem-solve", or "validate" modes
52
- - ✅ **No pre-loaded expertise** - All knowledge comes from dynamic research, not sector-specific templates
53
-
54
- **From waldo_core.md:**
55
- ```
56
- IF "build something new":
57
- → User is in creation/opportunity mode
58
- → Research: Industry trends, best practices, common architecture patterns
59
- → Tone: Excitement + grounding
60
-
61
- IF "stuck on problem":
62
- → User is in problem-solving mode
63
- → Research: Domain patterns, root cause analysis approaches, solution archetypes
64
- → Tone: Collaborative problem-solving
65
- ```
66
-
67
- ---
68
-
69
- ### Requirement 4: "Research agents from the start so Waldo can provide wise insights"
70
-
71
- **Implementation:**
72
- - ✅ **Immediate research launch** - Research agents launch in parallel immediately after context gathering
73
- - ✅ **Three research angles** - Best practices, common pitfalls, emerging patterns/alternatives
74
- - ✅ **Parallel execution** - All 2-3 research tasks in single message (proven Faraday pattern)
75
- - ✅ **Concurrent dialogue** - Research happens while Waldo greets and continues conversation
76
- - ✅ **Integration into questions** - Research findings inform every follow-up question
77
-
78
- **From waldo_core.md, Research Delegation Protocol:**
79
- ```
80
- WALDO LAUNCHES RESEARCH AGENTS (PARALLEL)
81
- [Single message, multiple Task calls]
82
- - Research Agent 1: Best practices and standards in [domain]
83
- - Research Agent 2: Common pitfalls and inefficiencies
84
- - (Optional) Research Agent 3: Emerging patterns or alternatives
85
-
86
- WHILE RESEARCH HAPPENS
87
- Waldo greets warmly and invites dialogue
88
-
89
- RESEARCH COMPLETES
90
- Waldo has context: best practices, standards, common failures, patterns
91
- ```
92
-
93
- ---
94
-
95
- ### Requirement 5: "One or two questions at a time - not a deluge"
96
-
97
- **Implementation:**
98
- - ✅ **Principle documented** - "One or Two Questions Per Turn" principle
99
- - ✅ **AskUserQuestion enforced** - Every question uses structured AskUserQuestion format
100
- - ✅ **Never 3+ questions** - Explicitly listed in "Avoid" section
101
- - ✅ **Clear options** - 2-4 focused options per question
102
- - ✅ **User agency** - "Other" option always available
103
-
104
- **From waldo_core.md:**
105
- ```
106
- ### Principle: One or Two Questions Per Turn
107
-
108
- Never ask a deluge. Use AskUserQuestion to:
109
- - Present 2-4 focused options
110
- - Keep "Other" open for user input
111
- - Move conversation forward with agency
112
- - Create structured, quotable insights
113
-
114
- **Avoid:**
115
- - Asking 3+ questions in one turn (overwhelming)
116
- ```
117
-
118
- ---
119
-
120
- ### Requirement 6: "If heading down inefficient path, gently steer the ship"
121
-
122
- **Implementation:**
123
- - ✅ **"Gentle Steering" pattern documented** - Explicit AskUserQuestion pattern for this
124
- - ✅ **Non-prescriptive** - "You're not saying 'don't do that.' You're raising awareness and letting them decide"
125
- - ✅ **Research-informed** - Steering based on research about common pitfalls
126
- - ✅ **Respectful tone** - Phrased as flags, not directives
127
-
128
- **From waldo_core.md, Gentle Steering Pattern:**
129
- ```
130
- "I want to make sure you're not heading down a path that
131
- catches teams off-guard. A really common inefficiency in [their domain]
132
- is [pitfall]. Does that concern you for what you're building?"
133
-
134
- Notice: You're not saying "don't do that." You're raising awareness
135
- and letting them decide. Collaborative, not prescriptive.
136
- ```
137
-
138
- ---
139
-
140
- ### Requirement 7: "Use AskUserQuestion tool for all interactions"
141
-
142
- **Implementation:**
143
- - ✅ **All dialogue via AskUserQuestion** - Every interaction documented as AskUserQuestion pattern
144
- - ✅ **Five specific patterns defined:**
145
- 1. Priorities exploration
146
- 2. Constraints understanding
147
- 3. Building on ideas (yes, and...)
148
- 4. Gentle steering
149
- 5. Formalization proposal
150
- - ✅ **State tracking** - Full AskUserQuestion history recorded in state file
151
- - ✅ **Structured format** - Question, header, options, multiselect, "Other" always available
152
-
153
- **From waldo_core.md:**
154
- ```
155
- AskUserQuestion Patterns:
156
- 1. Exploring Goals & Priorities
157
- 2. Understanding Constraints
158
- 3. Building on Their Ideas (Yes, And...)
159
- 4. Gentle Steering
160
- 5. Formalization proposal
161
- ```
162
-
163
- ---
164
-
165
- ### Requirement 8: "Greeting should ask about context"
166
-
167
- **Implementation:**
168
- - ✅ **Opening changed** - "What do you want to explore today?" instead of generic prompt
169
- - ✅ **Context options** - Four clear options (build, problem-solve, validate, other)
170
- - ✅ **Guides research** - User's answer directly determines research topics
171
- - ✅ **Conversational** - Warm, not robotic
172
-
173
- **From SKILL.md:**
174
- ```
175
- "Hey! I'm Waldo. I'm here to help you think through what you're exploring.
176
-
177
- Before we dive in, help me understand the frame: What do you want to
178
- explore today?"
179
-
180
- OPTIONS:
181
- - "I want to build or create something new"
182
- - "I'm stuck on a problem and need help thinking through it"
183
- - "I have an idea I want to validate or expand"
184
- - "Other: [describe what's on your mind]"
185
- ```
186
-
187
- ---
188
-
189
- ### Requirement 9: "Route to /intuition-handoff, not directly to plan"
190
-
191
- **Implementation:**
192
- - ✅ **Explicit routing** - All references direct to `/intuition-handoff`
193
- - ✅ **NOT to plan** - Explicitly states "NOT directly to /intuition-plan"
194
- - ✅ **User instruction** - Clear message sent to user at end of discovery
195
- - ✅ **Proper flow** - Orchestrator handles memory updates before planning begins
196
-
197
- **From waldo_core.md, Handoff section:**
198
- ```
199
- "Run /intuition-handoff to transition to planning"
200
-
201
- **Important:** Always route to `/intuition-handoff`, not `/intuition-plan`.
202
- The handoff skill handles the transition and maintains memory consistency.
203
- ```
204
-
205
- ---
206
-
207
- ### Requirement 10: "Be confident the solution works within larger skill architecture"
208
-
209
- **Implementation:**
210
- - ✅ **Uses proven patterns** - Task tool parallel delegation matches Faraday's working pattern
211
- - ✅ **File-based state** - Leverages existing state file system (no new architecture)
212
- - ✅ **Resume supported** - Works with existing resume mechanism
213
- - ✅ **AskUserQuestion proven** - Tool already available in skill declaration
214
- - ✅ **No changes needed** - Fits within current `/intuition-discovery` activation model
215
- - ✅ **Cross-sector ready** - Research adapts to any domain automatically
216
-
217
- **Research findings confirmed:**
218
- - Parallel task delegation works (Faraday does it successfully)
219
- - File-based state persistence works (entire Intuition system relies on it)
220
- - AskUserQuestion is proven (tool already in skill declaration)
221
- - Discovery skill can be continuous conversation (already designed for it)
222
- - No architectural changes needed (works within current skill system)
223
-
224
- ---
225
-
226
- ## Key Design Changes
227
-
228
- ### From v2 → v3
229
-
230
- | Aspect | v2 | v3 |
231
- |--------|----|----|
232
- | **Model** | Interviewer asking structured questions | Wise confidant with domain knowledge |
233
- | **Research** | Mentioned but not implemented | Immediate, parallel, research agents from start |
234
- | **Questions** | 20+ rapid-fire to collect info | 1-2 focused per turn, informed by research |
235
- | **Tone** | Neutral facilitator | Knowledgeable peer building together |
236
- | **Dialogue** | Template-driven (GAPP phases) | Natural flow using AskUserQuestion |
237
- | **Approach** | Extraction model | Collaborative thinking model |
238
- | **Cross-sector** | Generic questions | Dynamic research adapts per domain |
239
- | **Steering** | Limited guidance | Gentle steering based on research insights |
240
- | **Handoff** | Direct to planning | Via orchestrator to maintain memory |
241
-
242
- ---
243
-
244
- ## Files Modified
245
-
246
- ### 1. `/skills/intuition-discovery/references/waldo_core.md`
247
- - Complete rewrite (750 lines → 750 lines, new content)
248
- - New research delegation protocol (specific Task templates)
249
- - Five AskUserQuestion patterns documented
250
- - Complete state tracking schema
251
- - Resume logic
252
- - Quality checklist
253
-
254
- ### 2. `/skills/intuition-discovery/SKILL.md`
255
- - Updated description (emphasizes research-informed thinking)
256
- - Rewritten "How I Work" section
257
- - New "What Makes This Different" section
258
- - Updated "The Conversation" flow
259
- - New workflow diagram
260
- - Clarified next steps (route to /intuition-handoff)
261
-
262
- ---
263
-
264
- ## State Tracking Implementation
265
-
266
- Complete state tracking in `.project-memory-state.json`:
267
-
268
- ```json
269
- {
270
- "discovery": {
271
- "status": "in_progress|complete",
272
- "initial_context": { user_selected, timestamp },
273
- "research_performed": [
274
- {
275
- "task_id": "...",
276
- "topic": "...",
277
- "findings_summary": "...",
278
- "informed_questions": [...]
279
- }
280
- ],
281
- "conversation_via_asquestion": [
282
- {
283
- "turn": 1,
284
- "question": "...",
285
- "options_presented": [...],
286
- "user_selected": "...",
287
- "timestamp": "..."
288
- }
289
- ],
290
- "gapp": { problem, goals, ux_context, personalization },
291
- "assumptions": [...],
292
- "quality_score": { coverage, depth, ready_for_formalization }
293
- }
294
- }
295
- ```
296
-
297
- This enables:
298
- - Full conversation history preserved
299
- - Research findings tracked for handoff
300
- - GAPP coverage monitoring
301
- - Seamless resume capability
302
- - Quality assessment before formalization
303
-
304
- ---
305
-
306
- ## How It Works in Practice
307
-
308
- ### User Starts Discovery
309
-
310
- ```
311
- /intuition-discovery
312
- ```
313
-
314
- ### Waldo's Greeting (AskUserQuestion)
315
-
316
- ```
317
- "What do you want to explore today?"
318
-
319
- OPTIONS:
320
- - I want to build something new
321
- - I'm stuck on a problem
322
- - I want to validate/expand an idea
323
- - Other
324
- ```
325
-
326
- ### User Selects
327
-
328
- ```
329
- "I want to build an e-commerce platform for health-conscious consumers"
330
- ```
331
-
332
- ### Waldo Identifies & Launches Research (Parallel)
333
-
334
- ```
335
- Task 1: Research e-commerce best practices
336
- Task 2: Research common e-commerce pitfalls
337
- Task 3: Research emerging patterns (checkout, payments, etc.)
338
-
339
- [All three run in parallel while Waldo continues dialogue]
340
- ```
341
-
342
- ### Waldo Asks Research-Informed Question (AskUserQuestion)
343
-
344
- ```
345
- "Given that speed to market matters, what's your biggest constraint?"
346
-
347
- OPTIONS:
348
- - Team size/capability
349
- - Timeline
350
- - Budget
351
- - Technical debt
352
- - Other
353
- ```
354
-
355
- ### User Answers
356
-
357
- ```
358
- "Our team is small but fast - we need to launch in 6 months"
359
- ```
360
-
361
- ### Waldo Continues (Gentle Building)
362
-
363
- ```
364
- "You're thinking fast launch with a small team. One thing I've seen
365
- matter there is: keep payment processing simple (delegate it) so your
366
- team focuses on differentiation. How are you thinking about payments?"
367
-
368
- OPTIONS:
369
- - Stripe + standard flow
370
- - Custom payment experience
371
- - Marketplace payments
372
- - Haven't thought about it yet
373
- - Other
374
- ```
375
-
376
- ### Research Insights Flow
377
-
378
- ```
379
- Research finds: Common pitfall is overengineering payment systems early
380
- → Informs this question
381
- → Steers toward efficient path
382
- → User feels guided, not lectured
383
- ```
384
-
385
- ### This Continues
386
-
387
- - 1-2 questions per turn
388
- - Each informed by research
389
- - Building on their ideas (yes, and...)
390
- - Natural exploration of problem, goals, context, motivation
391
- - When all GAPP dimensions covered: "Ready to formalize?"
392
-
393
- ### Discovery Complete
394
-
395
- ```
396
- Creates:
397
- - discovery_brief.md (narrative)
398
- - discovery_output.json (structured)
399
-
400
- Sends user to:
401
- /intuition-handoff (NOT directly to plan)
402
- ```
403
-
404
- ---
405
-
406
- ## Confidence Assessment
407
-
408
- **Architecture Fit:** ✅ Confident
409
- - Uses proven patterns (Faraday's parallel task delegation)
410
- - Leverages existing file-based state system
411
- - No new architecture needed
412
- - Works within current skill activation model
413
-
414
- **Cross-Sector:** ✅ Confident
415
- - Research adapts to any domain
416
- - No sector-specific templates
417
- - Generic thinking patterns apply universally
418
- - Context gathering makes it flexible
419
-
420
- **User Experience:** ✅ Confident
421
- - 1-2 questions per turn (not overwhelming)
422
- - Research-informed (wise, not robotic)
423
- - AskUserQuestion structure (clear, agency)
424
- - Gentle steering (collaborative, not prescriptive)
425
- - "Yes, and..." building (expansive, not critical)
426
-
427
- **Implementation:** ✅ Confident
428
- - All patterns documented explicitly
429
- - State tracking clear and comprehensive
430
- - Task delegation templates provided
431
- - Resume logic specified
432
- - Quality checklist defined
433
-
434
- ---
435
-
436
- ## Next Steps
437
-
438
- Waldo v3 is now documented and ready to implement. The documentation is comprehensive enough that Waldo (when running as the skill) can:
439
-
440
- 1. ✅ Launch research agents immediately
441
- 2. ✅ Ask 1-2 focused questions per turn via AskUserQuestion
442
- 3. ✅ Build on user ideas (yes, and... approach)
443
- 4. ✅ Integrate research insights naturally
444
- 5. ✅ Gently steer when needed
445
- 6. ✅ Track state across sessions
446
- 7. ✅ Route to handoff at completion
447
- 8. ✅ Work across any sector
448
-
449
- The vision you described has been fully implemented in the design documentation.