@tgoodington/intuition 11.4.0 → 11.5.1
This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
- package/package.json +1 -2
- package/skills/intuition-enuncia-compose/SKILL.md +5 -10
- package/skills/intuition-enuncia-design/SKILL.md +0 -4
- package/skills/intuition-enuncia-discovery/SKILL.md +1 -7
- package/skills/intuition-enuncia-execute/SKILL.md +0 -4
- package/skills/intuition-enuncia-handoff/SKILL.md +0 -4
- package/skills/intuition-enuncia-initialize/references/claude_template.md +20 -0
- package/skills/intuition-enuncia-start/SKILL.md +0 -4
- package/skills/intuition-enuncia-verify/SKILL.md +0 -4
- package/docs/archive/ARCHITECTURE_OVERVIEW.txt +0 -405
- package/docs/archive/INSTALLATION.md +0 -431
- package/docs/archive/PROJECT_CONTEXT.md +0 -361
- package/docs/archive/QUICK_TEST_CHECKLIST.md +0 -467
- package/docs/archive/SKILL_INTERACTION_GUIDE.md +0 -993
- package/docs/archive/TESTING_README.md +0 -215
- package/docs/archive/TESTING_SUMMARY.md +0 -781
- package/docs/archive/WALDO_V3_COMPLETE_DOCUMENTATION.md +0 -538
- package/docs/archive/WALDO_V3_DESIGN_SUMMARY.md +0 -449
- package/docs/archive/intuition-architecture.md +0 -342
- package/docs/archive/intuition-workflow.md +0 -210
- package/docs/archive/intuition_design_skill_spec.md +0 -219
- package/docs/archive/v7_design_spec.md +0 -1111
- package/docs/archive/v7_plan.md +0 -339
- package/docs/archive/v9-design/decision-framework-direction.md +0 -142
- package/docs/archive/v9-design/decision-framework-implementation.md +0 -114
- package/docs/archive/v9-design/domain-adaptive-team-architecture.md +0 -1016
- package/docs/archive/v9-test/SESSION_SUMMARY.md +0 -117
- package/docs/archive/v9-test/TEST_PLAN.md +0 -119
- package/docs/archive/v9-test/blueprints/legal-analyst.md +0 -166
- package/docs/archive/v9-test/output/07_cover_letter.md +0 -41
- package/docs/archive/v9-test/phase2/mock_plan.md +0 -89
- package/docs/archive/v9-test/phase2/producers.json +0 -32
- package/docs/archive/v9-test/phase2/specialists/database-architect.specialist.md +0 -10
- package/docs/archive/v9-test/phase2/specialists/financial-analyst.specialist.md +0 -10
- package/docs/archive/v9-test/phase2/specialists/legal-analyst.specialist.md +0 -10
- package/docs/archive/v9-test/phase2/specialists/technical-writer.specialist.md +0 -10
- package/docs/archive/v9-test/phase2/team_assignment.json +0 -61
- package/docs/archive/v9-test/phase3/blueprints/legal-analyst.md +0 -840
- package/docs/archive/v9-test/phase3/legal-analyst-full.specialist.md +0 -111
- package/docs/archive/v9-test/phase3/project_context/nh_landlord_tenant_notes.md +0 -35
- package/docs/archive/v9-test/phase3/project_context/property_facts.md +0 -32
- package/docs/archive/v9-test/phase3b/blueprints/legal-analyst.md +0 -1715
- package/docs/archive/v9-test/phase3b/legal-analyst.specialist.md +0 -153
- package/docs/archive/v9-test/phase3b/scratch/legal-analyst-stage1.md +0 -270
- package/docs/archive/v9-test/phase4/TEST_PLAN.md +0 -32
- package/docs/archive/v9-test/phase4/blueprints/financial-analyst-T2.md +0 -538
- package/docs/archive/v9-test/phase4/blueprints/legal-analyst-T4.md +0 -253
- package/docs/archive/v9-test/phase4/cross-blueprint-check.md +0 -280
- package/docs/archive/v9-test/phase4/scratch/financial-analyst-T2-stage1.md +0 -67
- package/docs/archive/v9-test/phase4/scratch/legal-analyst-T4-stage1.md +0 -54
- package/docs/archive/v9-test/phase4/specialists/financial-analyst.specialist.md +0 -156
- package/docs/archive/v9-test/phase4/specialists/legal-analyst.specialist.md +0 -153
- package/docs/archive/v9-test/phase5/TEST_PLAN.md +0 -35
- package/docs/archive/v9-test/phase5/blueprints/code-architect-hw-vetter.md +0 -375
- package/docs/archive/v9-test/phase5/output/04_compliance_checklist.md +0 -149
- package/docs/archive/v9-test/phase5/output/hardware-vetter-SKILL-v2.md +0 -561
- package/docs/archive/v9-test/phase5/output/hardware-vetter-SKILL.md +0 -459
- package/docs/archive/v9-test/phase5/producers/code-writer.producer.md +0 -49
- package/docs/archive/v9-test/phase5/producers/document-writer.producer.md +0 -62
- package/docs/archive/v9-test/phase5/regression-comparison-v2.md +0 -60
- package/docs/archive/v9-test/phase5/regression-comparison.md +0 -197
- package/docs/archive/v9-test/phase5/review-5A-specialist.md +0 -213
- package/docs/archive/v9-test/phase5/specialist-test/TEST_PLAN.md +0 -60
- package/docs/archive/v9-test/phase5/specialist-test/blueprint-comparison.md +0 -252
- package/docs/archive/v9-test/phase5/specialist-test/blueprints/code-architect-hw-vetter.md +0 -916
- package/docs/archive/v9-test/phase5/specialist-test/scratch/code-architect-stage1.md +0 -427
- package/docs/archive/v9-test/phase5/specialists/code-architect.specialist.md +0 -168
- package/docs/archive/v9-test/phase5b/TEST_PLAN.md +0 -219
- package/docs/archive/v9-test/phase5b/blueprints/5B-10-stage2-with-decisions.md +0 -286
- package/docs/archive/v9-test/phase5b/decisions/5B-2-accept-all-decisions.json +0 -68
- package/docs/archive/v9-test/phase5b/decisions/5B-3-promote-decisions.json +0 -70
- package/docs/archive/v9-test/phase5b/decisions/5B-4-individual-decisions.json +0 -68
- package/docs/archive/v9-test/phase5b/decisions/5B-5-triage-decisions.json +0 -110
- package/docs/archive/v9-test/phase5b/decisions/5B-6-fallback-decisions.json +0 -40
- package/docs/archive/v9-test/phase5b/decisions/5B-8-partial-decisions.json +0 -46
- package/docs/archive/v9-test/phase5b/decisions/5B-9-complete-decisions.json +0 -54
- package/docs/archive/v9-test/phase5b/scratch/code-architect-stage1.md +0 -133
- package/docs/archive/v9-test/phase5b/specialists/code-architect.specialist.md +0 -202
- package/docs/archive/v9-test/phase5b/stage1-many-decisions.md +0 -139
- package/docs/archive/v9-test/phase5b/stage1-no-assumptions.md +0 -70
- package/docs/archive/v9-test/phase5b/stage1-with-assumptions.md +0 -86
- package/docs/archive/v9-test/phase5b/test-5B-1-results.md +0 -157
- package/docs/archive/v9-test/phase5b/test-5B-10-results.md +0 -130
- package/docs/archive/v9-test/phase5b/test-5B-2-results.md +0 -75
- package/docs/archive/v9-test/phase5b/test-5B-3-results.md +0 -104
- package/docs/archive/v9-test/phase5b/test-5B-4-results.md +0 -114
- package/docs/archive/v9-test/phase5b/test-5B-5-results.md +0 -126
- package/docs/archive/v9-test/phase5b/test-5B-6-results.md +0 -60
- package/docs/archive/v9-test/phase5b/test-5B-7-results.md +0 -141
- package/docs/archive/v9-test/phase5b/test-5B-8-results.md +0 -115
- package/docs/archive/v9-test/phase5b/test-5B-9-results.md +0 -76
- package/docs/archive/v9-test/producers/document-writer.producer.md +0 -62
- package/docs/archive/v9-test/specialists/legal-analyst.specialist.md +0 -58
- package/docs/project_notes/.project-memory-state.json +0 -100
- package/docs/project_notes/archive/trunk-v9.2-complete/.gitkeep +0 -0
- package/docs/project_notes/archive/trunk-v9.2-complete/.planning_research/decision_file_naming.md +0 -15
- package/docs/project_notes/archive/trunk-v9.2-complete/.planning_research/decisions_log.md +0 -32
- package/docs/project_notes/archive/trunk-v9.2-complete/.planning_research/orientation.md +0 -51
- package/docs/project_notes/archive/trunk-v9.2-complete/audit/plan-rename-hitlist.md +0 -654
- package/docs/project_notes/archive/trunk-v9.2-complete/blueprint-conflicts.md +0 -109
- package/docs/project_notes/archive/trunk-v9.2-complete/blueprints/database-architect.md +0 -416
- package/docs/project_notes/archive/trunk-v9.2-complete/blueprints/devops-infrastructure.md +0 -514
- package/docs/project_notes/archive/trunk-v9.2-complete/blueprints/technical-writer.md +0 -788
- package/docs/project_notes/archive/trunk-v9.2-complete/build_brief.md +0 -119
- package/docs/project_notes/archive/trunk-v9.2-complete/build_report.md +0 -250
- package/docs/project_notes/archive/trunk-v9.2-complete/detail_brief.md +0 -94
- package/docs/project_notes/archive/trunk-v9.2-complete/plan.md +0 -182
- package/docs/project_notes/archive/trunk-v9.2-complete/planning_brief.md +0 -96
- package/docs/project_notes/archive/trunk-v9.2-complete/prompt_brief.md +0 -60
- package/docs/project_notes/archive/trunk-v9.2-complete/prompt_output.json +0 -98
- package/docs/project_notes/archive/trunk-v9.2-complete/scratch/database-architect-decisions.json +0 -72
- package/docs/project_notes/archive/trunk-v9.2-complete/scratch/database-architect-research-plan.md +0 -10
- package/docs/project_notes/archive/trunk-v9.2-complete/scratch/database-architect-stage1.md +0 -226
- package/docs/project_notes/archive/trunk-v9.2-complete/scratch/devops-infrastructure-decisions.json +0 -71
- package/docs/project_notes/archive/trunk-v9.2-complete/scratch/devops-infrastructure-research-plan.md +0 -7
- package/docs/project_notes/archive/trunk-v9.2-complete/scratch/devops-infrastructure-stage1.md +0 -164
- package/docs/project_notes/archive/trunk-v9.2-complete/scratch/technical-writer-decisions.json +0 -88
- package/docs/project_notes/archive/trunk-v9.2-complete/scratch/technical-writer-research-plan.md +0 -7
- package/docs/project_notes/archive/trunk-v9.2-complete/scratch/technical-writer-stage1.md +0 -266
- package/docs/project_notes/archive/trunk-v9.2-complete/team_assignment.json +0 -108
- package/docs/project_notes/archive/trunk-v9.2-complete/test_brief.md +0 -75
- package/docs/project_notes/archive/trunk-v9.2-complete/test_report.md +0 -26
- package/docs/project_notes/archive/trunk-v9.2-complete/verification/devops-infrastructure-verification.md +0 -172
- package/docs/project_notes/branches/.gitkeep +0 -0
- package/docs/project_notes/bugs.md +0 -41
- package/docs/project_notes/decisions.md +0 -147
- package/docs/project_notes/issues.md +0 -101
- package/docs/project_notes/key_facts.md +0 -88
- package/docs/project_notes/trunk/.gitkeep +0 -0
- package/docs/project_notes/trunk/discovery_brief.md +0 -40
- package/docs/project_notes/v9.2-optimization-plan.md +0 -193
|
@@ -1,449 +0,0 @@
|
|
|
1
|
-
# Waldo v3 - Design Summary
|
|
2
|
-
|
|
3
|
-
## What Was Changed
|
|
4
|
-
|
|
5
|
-
Waldo has been completely redesigned from an interrogator/interviewer model to a **research-informed thinking partnership** model. This document confirms the implementation against your requirements.
|
|
6
|
-
|
|
7
|
-
---
|
|
8
|
-
|
|
9
|
-
## Your Requirements vs. Implementation
|
|
10
|
-
|
|
11
|
-
### Requirement 1: "I want a thinking partner, not someone asking good questions"
|
|
12
|
-
|
|
13
|
-
**Implementation:**
|
|
14
|
-
- ✅ **Philosophy shifted** - Waldo is now a "wise confidant who has done homework beforehand"
|
|
15
|
-
- ✅ **Research-first approach** - Waldo researches the domain immediately (best practices, pitfalls, alternatives)
|
|
16
|
-
- ✅ **Perspective-bringing** - Waldo brings knowledge to the conversation, not neutrality
|
|
17
|
-
- ✅ **Collaborative thinking** - "We think together" model, not extraction model
|
|
18
|
-
|
|
19
|
-
**Key quote from waldo_core.md:**
|
|
20
|
-
> "You don't extract information—you're a wise confidant who has done homework beforehand, brings perspective on best practices and common pitfalls, and helps users expand their own thinking through genuine 'yes, and...' collaboration."
|
|
21
|
-
|
|
22
|
-
---
|
|
23
|
-
|
|
24
|
-
### Requirement 2: "Use 'yes, and...' paradigm - build on ideas, don't challenge"
|
|
25
|
-
|
|
26
|
-
**Implementation:**
|
|
27
|
-
- ✅ **"Yes, and..." pattern documented** - Explicit AskUserQuestion pattern for "Building on Their Ideas"
|
|
28
|
-
- ✅ **Never negate** - Pattern explicitly states "You accept their framing (yes), expand it with knowledge (and), don't negate or redirect"
|
|
29
|
-
- ✅ **Expansive, not reductive** - All dialogue is about expanding their thinking, not critiquing it
|
|
30
|
-
- ✅ **Tone enforcement** - Waldo's voice includes "Building, not judging" and explicitly avoids "Validating every answer"
|
|
31
|
-
|
|
32
|
-
**From waldo_core.md, AskUserQuestion Pattern:**
|
|
33
|
-
```
|
|
34
|
-
"You're thinking about [their approach]. In that direction,
|
|
35
|
-
one thing I've seen matter is [insight from research]. How are you
|
|
36
|
-
thinking about [that aspect]?"
|
|
37
|
-
|
|
38
|
-
This is "yes, and..." in action:
|
|
39
|
-
- You accept their framing (yes)
|
|
40
|
-
- You expand it with knowledge (and)
|
|
41
|
-
- You don't negate or redirect
|
|
42
|
-
```
|
|
43
|
-
|
|
44
|
-
---
|
|
45
|
-
|
|
46
|
-
### Requirement 3: "Cross-sector capability through context gathering on the fly"
|
|
47
|
-
|
|
48
|
-
**Implementation:**
|
|
49
|
-
- ✅ **Context gathering first** - Opening AskUserQuestion asks "What do you want to explore today?" with domain-agnostic options
|
|
50
|
-
- ✅ **Dynamic research** - Research tasks dynamically reference user's domain and goal
|
|
51
|
-
- ✅ **Adaptive tone** - Different tones for "build", "problem-solve", or "validate" modes
|
|
52
|
-
- ✅ **No pre-loaded expertise** - All knowledge comes from dynamic research, not sector-specific templates
|
|
53
|
-
|
|
54
|
-
**From waldo_core.md:**
|
|
55
|
-
```
|
|
56
|
-
IF "build something new":
|
|
57
|
-
→ User is in creation/opportunity mode
|
|
58
|
-
→ Research: Industry trends, best practices, common architecture patterns
|
|
59
|
-
→ Tone: Excitement + grounding
|
|
60
|
-
|
|
61
|
-
IF "stuck on problem":
|
|
62
|
-
→ User is in problem-solving mode
|
|
63
|
-
→ Research: Domain patterns, root cause analysis approaches, solution archetypes
|
|
64
|
-
→ Tone: Collaborative problem-solving
|
|
65
|
-
```
|
|
66
|
-
|
|
67
|
-
---
|
|
68
|
-
|
|
69
|
-
### Requirement 4: "Research agents from the start so Waldo can provide wise insights"
|
|
70
|
-
|
|
71
|
-
**Implementation:**
|
|
72
|
-
- ✅ **Immediate research launch** - Research agents launch in parallel immediately after context gathering
|
|
73
|
-
- ✅ **Three research angles** - Best practices, common pitfalls, emerging patterns/alternatives
|
|
74
|
-
- ✅ **Parallel execution** - All 2-3 research tasks in single message (proven Faraday pattern)
|
|
75
|
-
- ✅ **Concurrent dialogue** - Research happens while Waldo greets and continues conversation
|
|
76
|
-
- ✅ **Integration into questions** - Research findings inform every follow-up question
|
|
77
|
-
|
|
78
|
-
**From waldo_core.md, Research Delegation Protocol:**
|
|
79
|
-
```
|
|
80
|
-
WALDO LAUNCHES RESEARCH AGENTS (PARALLEL)
|
|
81
|
-
[Single message, multiple Task calls]
|
|
82
|
-
- Research Agent 1: Best practices and standards in [domain]
|
|
83
|
-
- Research Agent 2: Common pitfalls and inefficiencies
|
|
84
|
-
- (Optional) Research Agent 3: Emerging patterns or alternatives
|
|
85
|
-
|
|
86
|
-
WHILE RESEARCH HAPPENS
|
|
87
|
-
Waldo greets warmly and invites dialogue
|
|
88
|
-
|
|
89
|
-
RESEARCH COMPLETES
|
|
90
|
-
Waldo has context: best practices, standards, common failures, patterns
|
|
91
|
-
```
|
|
92
|
-
|
|
93
|
-
---
|
|
94
|
-
|
|
95
|
-
### Requirement 5: "One or two questions at a time - not a deluge"
|
|
96
|
-
|
|
97
|
-
**Implementation:**
|
|
98
|
-
- ✅ **Principle documented** - "One or Two Questions Per Turn" principle
|
|
99
|
-
- ✅ **AskUserQuestion enforced** - Every question uses structured AskUserQuestion format
|
|
100
|
-
- ✅ **Never 3+ questions** - Explicitly listed in "Avoid" section
|
|
101
|
-
- ✅ **Clear options** - 2-4 focused options per question
|
|
102
|
-
- ✅ **User agency** - "Other" option always available
|
|
103
|
-
|
|
104
|
-
**From waldo_core.md:**
|
|
105
|
-
```
|
|
106
|
-
### Principle: One or Two Questions Per Turn
|
|
107
|
-
|
|
108
|
-
Never ask a deluge. Use AskUserQuestion to:
|
|
109
|
-
- Present 2-4 focused options
|
|
110
|
-
- Keep "Other" open for user input
|
|
111
|
-
- Move conversation forward with agency
|
|
112
|
-
- Create structured, quotable insights
|
|
113
|
-
|
|
114
|
-
**Avoid:**
|
|
115
|
-
- Asking 3+ questions in one turn (overwhelming)
|
|
116
|
-
```
|
|
117
|
-
|
|
118
|
-
---
|
|
119
|
-
|
|
120
|
-
### Requirement 6: "If heading down inefficient path, gently steer the ship"
|
|
121
|
-
|
|
122
|
-
**Implementation:**
|
|
123
|
-
- ✅ **"Gentle Steering" pattern documented** - Explicit AskUserQuestion pattern for this
|
|
124
|
-
- ✅ **Non-prescriptive** - "You're not saying 'don't do that.' You're raising awareness and letting them decide"
|
|
125
|
-
- ✅ **Research-informed** - Steering based on research about common pitfalls
|
|
126
|
-
- ✅ **Respectful tone** - Phrased as flags, not directives
|
|
127
|
-
|
|
128
|
-
**From waldo_core.md, Gentle Steering Pattern:**
|
|
129
|
-
```
|
|
130
|
-
"I want to make sure you're not heading down a path that
|
|
131
|
-
catches teams off-guard. A really common inefficiency in [their domain]
|
|
132
|
-
is [pitfall]. Does that concern you for what you're building?"
|
|
133
|
-
|
|
134
|
-
Notice: You're not saying "don't do that." You're raising awareness
|
|
135
|
-
and letting them decide. Collaborative, not prescriptive.
|
|
136
|
-
```
|
|
137
|
-
|
|
138
|
-
---
|
|
139
|
-
|
|
140
|
-
### Requirement 7: "Use AskUserQuestion tool for all interactions"
|
|
141
|
-
|
|
142
|
-
**Implementation:**
|
|
143
|
-
- ✅ **All dialogue via AskUserQuestion** - Every interaction documented as AskUserQuestion pattern
|
|
144
|
-
- ✅ **Five specific patterns defined:**
|
|
145
|
-
1. Priorities exploration
|
|
146
|
-
2. Constraints understanding
|
|
147
|
-
3. Building on ideas (yes, and...)
|
|
148
|
-
4. Gentle steering
|
|
149
|
-
5. Formalization proposal
|
|
150
|
-
- ✅ **State tracking** - Full AskUserQuestion history recorded in state file
|
|
151
|
-
- ✅ **Structured format** - Question, header, options, multiselect, "Other" always available
|
|
152
|
-
|
|
153
|
-
**From waldo_core.md:**
|
|
154
|
-
```
|
|
155
|
-
AskUserQuestion Patterns:
|
|
156
|
-
1. Exploring Goals & Priorities
|
|
157
|
-
2. Understanding Constraints
|
|
158
|
-
3. Building on Their Ideas (Yes, And...)
|
|
159
|
-
4. Gentle Steering
|
|
160
|
-
5. Formalization proposal
|
|
161
|
-
```
|
|
162
|
-
|
|
163
|
-
---
|
|
164
|
-
|
|
165
|
-
### Requirement 8: "Greeting should ask about context"
|
|
166
|
-
|
|
167
|
-
**Implementation:**
|
|
168
|
-
- ✅ **Opening changed** - "What do you want to explore today?" instead of generic prompt
|
|
169
|
-
- ✅ **Context options** - Four clear options (build, problem-solve, validate, other)
|
|
170
|
-
- ✅ **Guides research** - User's answer directly determines research topics
|
|
171
|
-
- ✅ **Conversational** - Warm, not robotic
|
|
172
|
-
|
|
173
|
-
**From SKILL.md:**
|
|
174
|
-
```
|
|
175
|
-
"Hey! I'm Waldo. I'm here to help you think through what you're exploring.
|
|
176
|
-
|
|
177
|
-
Before we dive in, help me understand the frame: What do you want to
|
|
178
|
-
explore today?"
|
|
179
|
-
|
|
180
|
-
OPTIONS:
|
|
181
|
-
- "I want to build or create something new"
|
|
182
|
-
- "I'm stuck on a problem and need help thinking through it"
|
|
183
|
-
- "I have an idea I want to validate or expand"
|
|
184
|
-
- "Other: [describe what's on your mind]"
|
|
185
|
-
```
|
|
186
|
-
|
|
187
|
-
---
|
|
188
|
-
|
|
189
|
-
### Requirement 9: "Route to /intuition-handoff, not directly to plan"
|
|
190
|
-
|
|
191
|
-
**Implementation:**
|
|
192
|
-
- ✅ **Explicit routing** - All references direct to `/intuition-handoff`
|
|
193
|
-
- ✅ **NOT to plan** - Explicitly states "NOT directly to /intuition-plan"
|
|
194
|
-
- ✅ **User instruction** - Clear message sent to user at end of discovery
|
|
195
|
-
- ✅ **Proper flow** - Orchestrator handles memory updates before planning begins
|
|
196
|
-
|
|
197
|
-
**From waldo_core.md, Handoff section:**
|
|
198
|
-
```
|
|
199
|
-
"Run /intuition-handoff to transition to planning"
|
|
200
|
-
|
|
201
|
-
**Important:** Always route to `/intuition-handoff`, not `/intuition-plan`.
|
|
202
|
-
The handoff skill handles the transition and maintains memory consistency.
|
|
203
|
-
```
|
|
204
|
-
|
|
205
|
-
---
|
|
206
|
-
|
|
207
|
-
### Requirement 10: "Be confident the solution works within larger skill architecture"
|
|
208
|
-
|
|
209
|
-
**Implementation:**
|
|
210
|
-
- ✅ **Uses proven patterns** - Task tool parallel delegation matches Faraday's working pattern
|
|
211
|
-
- ✅ **File-based state** - Leverages existing state file system (no new architecture)
|
|
212
|
-
- ✅ **Resume supported** - Works with existing resume mechanism
|
|
213
|
-
- ✅ **AskUserQuestion proven** - Tool already available in skill declaration
|
|
214
|
-
- ✅ **No changes needed** - Fits within current `/intuition-discovery` activation model
|
|
215
|
-
- ✅ **Cross-sector ready** - Research adapts to any domain automatically
|
|
216
|
-
|
|
217
|
-
**Research findings confirmed:**
|
|
218
|
-
- Parallel task delegation works (Faraday does it successfully)
|
|
219
|
-
- File-based state persistence works (entire Intuition system relies on it)
|
|
220
|
-
- AskUserQuestion is proven (tool already in skill declaration)
|
|
221
|
-
- Discovery skill can be continuous conversation (already designed for it)
|
|
222
|
-
- No architectural changes needed (works within current skill system)
|
|
223
|
-
|
|
224
|
-
---
|
|
225
|
-
|
|
226
|
-
## Key Design Changes
|
|
227
|
-
|
|
228
|
-
### From v2 → v3
|
|
229
|
-
|
|
230
|
-
| Aspect | v2 | v3 |
|
|
231
|
-
|--------|----|----|
|
|
232
|
-
| **Model** | Interviewer asking structured questions | Wise confidant with domain knowledge |
|
|
233
|
-
| **Research** | Mentioned but not implemented | Immediate, parallel, research agents from start |
|
|
234
|
-
| **Questions** | 20+ rapid-fire to collect info | 1-2 focused per turn, informed by research |
|
|
235
|
-
| **Tone** | Neutral facilitator | Knowledgeable peer building together |
|
|
236
|
-
| **Dialogue** | Template-driven (GAPP phases) | Natural flow using AskUserQuestion |
|
|
237
|
-
| **Approach** | Extraction model | Collaborative thinking model |
|
|
238
|
-
| **Cross-sector** | Generic questions | Dynamic research adapts per domain |
|
|
239
|
-
| **Steering** | Limited guidance | Gentle steering based on research insights |
|
|
240
|
-
| **Handoff** | Direct to planning | Via orchestrator to maintain memory |
|
|
241
|
-
|
|
242
|
-
---
|
|
243
|
-
|
|
244
|
-
## Files Modified
|
|
245
|
-
|
|
246
|
-
### 1. `/skills/intuition-discovery/references/waldo_core.md`
|
|
247
|
-
- Complete rewrite (750 lines → 750 lines, new content)
|
|
248
|
-
- New research delegation protocol (specific Task templates)
|
|
249
|
-
- Five AskUserQuestion patterns documented
|
|
250
|
-
- Complete state tracking schema
|
|
251
|
-
- Resume logic
|
|
252
|
-
- Quality checklist
|
|
253
|
-
|
|
254
|
-
### 2. `/skills/intuition-discovery/SKILL.md`
|
|
255
|
-
- Updated description (emphasizes research-informed thinking)
|
|
256
|
-
- Rewritten "How I Work" section
|
|
257
|
-
- New "What Makes This Different" section
|
|
258
|
-
- Updated "The Conversation" flow
|
|
259
|
-
- New workflow diagram
|
|
260
|
-
- Clarified next steps (route to /intuition-handoff)
|
|
261
|
-
|
|
262
|
-
---
|
|
263
|
-
|
|
264
|
-
## State Tracking Implementation
|
|
265
|
-
|
|
266
|
-
Complete state tracking in `.project-memory-state.json`:
|
|
267
|
-
|
|
268
|
-
```json
|
|
269
|
-
{
|
|
270
|
-
"discovery": {
|
|
271
|
-
"status": "in_progress|complete",
|
|
272
|
-
"initial_context": { user_selected, timestamp },
|
|
273
|
-
"research_performed": [
|
|
274
|
-
{
|
|
275
|
-
"task_id": "...",
|
|
276
|
-
"topic": "...",
|
|
277
|
-
"findings_summary": "...",
|
|
278
|
-
"informed_questions": [...]
|
|
279
|
-
}
|
|
280
|
-
],
|
|
281
|
-
"conversation_via_asquestion": [
|
|
282
|
-
{
|
|
283
|
-
"turn": 1,
|
|
284
|
-
"question": "...",
|
|
285
|
-
"options_presented": [...],
|
|
286
|
-
"user_selected": "...",
|
|
287
|
-
"timestamp": "..."
|
|
288
|
-
}
|
|
289
|
-
],
|
|
290
|
-
"gapp": { problem, goals, ux_context, personalization },
|
|
291
|
-
"assumptions": [...],
|
|
292
|
-
"quality_score": { coverage, depth, ready_for_formalization }
|
|
293
|
-
}
|
|
294
|
-
}
|
|
295
|
-
```
|
|
296
|
-
|
|
297
|
-
This enables:
|
|
298
|
-
- Full conversation history preserved
|
|
299
|
-
- Research findings tracked for handoff
|
|
300
|
-
- GAPP coverage monitoring
|
|
301
|
-
- Seamless resume capability
|
|
302
|
-
- Quality assessment before formalization
|
|
303
|
-
|
|
304
|
-
---
|
|
305
|
-
|
|
306
|
-
## How It Works in Practice
|
|
307
|
-
|
|
308
|
-
### User Starts Discovery
|
|
309
|
-
|
|
310
|
-
```
|
|
311
|
-
/intuition-discovery
|
|
312
|
-
```
|
|
313
|
-
|
|
314
|
-
### Waldo's Greeting (AskUserQuestion)
|
|
315
|
-
|
|
316
|
-
```
|
|
317
|
-
"What do you want to explore today?"
|
|
318
|
-
|
|
319
|
-
OPTIONS:
|
|
320
|
-
- I want to build something new
|
|
321
|
-
- I'm stuck on a problem
|
|
322
|
-
- I want to validate/expand an idea
|
|
323
|
-
- Other
|
|
324
|
-
```
|
|
325
|
-
|
|
326
|
-
### User Selects
|
|
327
|
-
|
|
328
|
-
```
|
|
329
|
-
"I want to build an e-commerce platform for health-conscious consumers"
|
|
330
|
-
```
|
|
331
|
-
|
|
332
|
-
### Waldo Identifies & Launches Research (Parallel)
|
|
333
|
-
|
|
334
|
-
```
|
|
335
|
-
Task 1: Research e-commerce best practices
|
|
336
|
-
Task 2: Research common e-commerce pitfalls
|
|
337
|
-
Task 3: Research emerging patterns (checkout, payments, etc.)
|
|
338
|
-
|
|
339
|
-
[All three run in parallel while Waldo continues dialogue]
|
|
340
|
-
```
|
|
341
|
-
|
|
342
|
-
### Waldo Asks Research-Informed Question (AskUserQuestion)
|
|
343
|
-
|
|
344
|
-
```
|
|
345
|
-
"Given that speed to market matters, what's your biggest constraint?"
|
|
346
|
-
|
|
347
|
-
OPTIONS:
|
|
348
|
-
- Team size/capability
|
|
349
|
-
- Timeline
|
|
350
|
-
- Budget
|
|
351
|
-
- Technical debt
|
|
352
|
-
- Other
|
|
353
|
-
```
|
|
354
|
-
|
|
355
|
-
### User Answers
|
|
356
|
-
|
|
357
|
-
```
|
|
358
|
-
"Our team is small but fast - we need to launch in 6 months"
|
|
359
|
-
```
|
|
360
|
-
|
|
361
|
-
### Waldo Continues (Gentle Building)
|
|
362
|
-
|
|
363
|
-
```
|
|
364
|
-
"You're thinking fast launch with a small team. One thing I've seen
|
|
365
|
-
matter there is: keep payment processing simple (delegate it) so your
|
|
366
|
-
team focuses on differentiation. How are you thinking about payments?"
|
|
367
|
-
|
|
368
|
-
OPTIONS:
|
|
369
|
-
- Stripe + standard flow
|
|
370
|
-
- Custom payment experience
|
|
371
|
-
- Marketplace payments
|
|
372
|
-
- Haven't thought about it yet
|
|
373
|
-
- Other
|
|
374
|
-
```
|
|
375
|
-
|
|
376
|
-
### Research Insights Flow
|
|
377
|
-
|
|
378
|
-
```
|
|
379
|
-
Research finds: Common pitfall is overengineering payment systems early
|
|
380
|
-
→ Informs this question
|
|
381
|
-
→ Steers toward efficient path
|
|
382
|
-
→ User feels guided, not lectured
|
|
383
|
-
```
|
|
384
|
-
|
|
385
|
-
### This Continues
|
|
386
|
-
|
|
387
|
-
- 1-2 questions per turn
|
|
388
|
-
- Each informed by research
|
|
389
|
-
- Building on their ideas (yes, and...)
|
|
390
|
-
- Natural exploration of problem, goals, context, motivation
|
|
391
|
-
- When all GAPP dimensions covered: "Ready to formalize?"
|
|
392
|
-
|
|
393
|
-
### Discovery Complete
|
|
394
|
-
|
|
395
|
-
```
|
|
396
|
-
Creates:
|
|
397
|
-
- discovery_brief.md (narrative)
|
|
398
|
-
- discovery_output.json (structured)
|
|
399
|
-
|
|
400
|
-
Sends user to:
|
|
401
|
-
/intuition-handoff (NOT directly to plan)
|
|
402
|
-
```
|
|
403
|
-
|
|
404
|
-
---
|
|
405
|
-
|
|
406
|
-
## Confidence Assessment
|
|
407
|
-
|
|
408
|
-
**Architecture Fit:** ✅ Confident
|
|
409
|
-
- Uses proven patterns (Faraday's parallel task delegation)
|
|
410
|
-
- Leverages existing file-based state system
|
|
411
|
-
- No new architecture needed
|
|
412
|
-
- Works within current skill activation model
|
|
413
|
-
|
|
414
|
-
**Cross-Sector:** ✅ Confident
|
|
415
|
-
- Research adapts to any domain
|
|
416
|
-
- No sector-specific templates
|
|
417
|
-
- Generic thinking patterns apply universally
|
|
418
|
-
- Context gathering makes it flexible
|
|
419
|
-
|
|
420
|
-
**User Experience:** ✅ Confident
|
|
421
|
-
- 1-2 questions per turn (not overwhelming)
|
|
422
|
-
- Research-informed (wise, not robotic)
|
|
423
|
-
- AskUserQuestion structure (clear, agency)
|
|
424
|
-
- Gentle steering (collaborative, not prescriptive)
|
|
425
|
-
- "Yes, and..." building (expansive, not critical)
|
|
426
|
-
|
|
427
|
-
**Implementation:** ✅ Confident
|
|
428
|
-
- All patterns documented explicitly
|
|
429
|
-
- State tracking clear and comprehensive
|
|
430
|
-
- Task delegation templates provided
|
|
431
|
-
- Resume logic specified
|
|
432
|
-
- Quality checklist defined
|
|
433
|
-
|
|
434
|
-
---
|
|
435
|
-
|
|
436
|
-
## Next Steps
|
|
437
|
-
|
|
438
|
-
Waldo v3 is now documented and ready to implement. The documentation is comprehensive enough that Waldo (when running as the skill) can:
|
|
439
|
-
|
|
440
|
-
1. ✅ Launch research agents immediately
|
|
441
|
-
2. ✅ Ask 1-2 focused questions per turn via AskUserQuestion
|
|
442
|
-
3. ✅ Build on user ideas (yes, and... approach)
|
|
443
|
-
4. ✅ Integrate research insights naturally
|
|
444
|
-
5. ✅ Gently steer when needed
|
|
445
|
-
6. ✅ Track state across sessions
|
|
446
|
-
7. ✅ Route to handoff at completion
|
|
447
|
-
8. ✅ Work across any sector
|
|
448
|
-
|
|
449
|
-
The vision you described has been fully implemented in the design documentation.
|