@tgoodington/intuition 10.6.0 → 10.7.0

This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
package/package.json CHANGED
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
1
1
  {
2
2
  "name": "@tgoodington/intuition",
3
- "version": "10.6.0",
3
+ "version": "10.7.0",
4
4
  "description": "Domain-adaptive workflow system for Claude Code: prompt, outline, assemble specialist teams, detail with domain experts, build with format producers, test code output. Supports v8 compat (design, engineer, build) and v9 specialist workflows with 14 domain specialists and 6 format producers.",
5
5
  "keywords": [
6
6
  "claude-code",
@@ -130,11 +130,17 @@ If the user's initial CAPTURE response already covers some dimensions, skip them
130
130
 
131
131
  Every question in REFINE follows these principles:
132
132
 
133
- **Derive from their words.** Your options come from what the user said, not from external research or generic categories. The number of options reflects the actual decision space. Examples at different scales:
133
+ **Derive from their words.** Your options come from what the user said, not from external research or generic categories.
134
134
 
135
- - Binary: "You said 'handle transfers' — does that mean (a) bulk migration when someone leaves, or (b) real-time co-ownership?"
136
- - Ternary: "You mentioned 'fast' — is that (a) sub-second response times, (b) same-day turnaround, or (c) perceived speed through progressive loading?"
137
- - Wider: "The notification system could be (a) email-only, (b) in-app real-time, (c) digest-based batching, or (d) user-configured per event type."
135
+ **ANTI-PATTERN: Always presenting 3 options.** This is the most common failure mode. You must count the actual distinct possibilities the user's words imply sometimes that's 2, sometimes 5, sometimes 6. Three is not a safe default; it's a lazy one. Before presenting options, explicitly list the distinct possibilities you've identified and use ALL of them.
136
+
137
+ Examples at different scales:
138
+
139
+ - 2 options: "You said 'handle transfers' — does that mean (a) bulk migration when someone leaves, or (b) real-time co-ownership?"
140
+ - 3 options: "You mentioned 'fast' — is that (a) sub-second response times, (b) same-day turnaround, or (c) perceived speed through progressive loading?"
141
+ - 4 options: "The notification system could be (a) email-only, (b) in-app real-time, (c) digest-based batching, or (d) user-configured per event type."
142
+ - 5 options: "For auth you've got (a) email/password, (b) SSO via existing provider, (c) magic links, (d) OAuth social login, or (e) passkeys."
143
+ - 6+ options: "The dashboard layout could be (a) single KPI grid, (b) tabbed by department, (c) role-based views, (d) customizable drag-and-drop, (e) narrative/report style, or (f) a combined feed with filters."
138
144
 
139
145
  Always include a trailing "or something else entirely?" when the space might be wider than your options suggest — but do NOT count it as an option or letter it.
140
146