@tekyzinc/gsd-t 2.15.0 → 2.15.2

This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
package/CHANGELOG.md CHANGED
@@ -2,6 +2,16 @@
2
2
 
3
3
  All notable changes to GSD-T are documented here. Updated with each release.
4
4
 
5
+ ## [2.15.2] - 2026-02-13
6
+
7
+ ### Changed
8
+ - `gsd-t-gap-analysis` team mode now handles flat requirement lists — chunks into batches of ~8–10 per teammate instead of requiring sections
9
+
10
+ ## [2.15.1] - 2026-02-13
11
+
12
+ ### Changed
13
+ - `gsd-t-gap-analysis` now uses agent team mode automatically — one teammate per requirement section for parallel scanning and classification, with solo fallback
14
+
5
15
  ## [2.15.0] - 2026-02-13
6
16
 
7
17
  ### Added
@@ -48,20 +48,16 @@ Review each requirement for ambiguity. If any are unclear:
48
48
  Discuss now or proceed with assumptions?
49
49
  ```
50
50
 
51
- ## Step 4: System Scan
51
+ ## Step 4: System Scan + Gap Classification (Team Mode)
52
52
 
53
- Scan the existing codebase to understand current state. Read:
54
- - Source files relevant to each requirement
55
- - Test files for coverage evidence
56
- - Configuration and schema files
57
- - Existing contracts in `.gsd-t/contracts/`
58
- - Documentation in `docs/`
53
+ Automatically use agent teams to scan and classify requirements in parallel.
59
54
 
60
- Build an understanding of what exists before classifying.
55
+ ### Team Distribution Strategy
61
56
 
62
- ## Step 5: Gap Classification
57
+ - **Spec has sections**: One teammate per section
58
+ - **Flat list (no sections)**: Chunk requirements into batches of ~8–10 and assign one teammate per batch (e.g., 30 requirements → 3 teammates handling R1–R10, R11–R20, R21–R30)
63
59
 
64
- For each requirement, classify with evidence:
60
+ ### Classification Reference
65
61
 
66
62
  | Status | Meaning | Action Needed |
67
63
  |--------|---------|---------------|
@@ -70,8 +66,6 @@ For each requirement, classify with evidence:
70
66
  | **Incorrect** | Code exists but doesn't match the requirement | Fix implementation |
71
67
  | **Not Implemented** | No code exists for this requirement | Build from scratch |
72
68
 
73
- Assign severity to gaps:
74
-
75
69
  | Severity | Criteria |
76
70
  |----------|----------|
77
71
  | **Critical** | Incorrect implementation — existing code actively contradicts the requirement |
@@ -79,6 +73,53 @@ Assign severity to gaps:
79
73
  | **Medium** | Not implemented — required but no code exists yet |
80
74
  | **Low** | Not implemented — nice-to-have or can be deferred |
81
75
 
76
+ ### Team Execution
77
+
78
+ ```
79
+ Create an agent team for gap analysis:
80
+
81
+ ALL TEAMMATES must read before starting:
82
+ 1. CLAUDE.md — project conventions
83
+ 2. docs/architecture.md — system structure
84
+ 3. docs/requirements.md — existing requirements
85
+ 4. .gsd-t/contracts/ — domain interfaces
86
+
87
+ Classification rules:
88
+ - For each requirement, search the codebase for relevant code
89
+ - Cite specific files and line numbers as evidence
90
+ - Classify as: Implemented / Partial / Incorrect / Not Implemented
91
+ - Assign severity: Critical / High / Medium / Low
92
+ - Flag assumptions with [ASSUMED: {reason}]
93
+
94
+ Output format per requirement:
95
+ | ID | Requirement | Status | Severity | Evidence |
96
+
97
+ Teammate assignments:
98
+ If spec has sections — one teammate per section:
99
+ - Teammate "section-1": Scan and classify {Section 1} (R1–R{N})
100
+ - Teammate "section-2": Scan and classify {Section 2} (R{N+1}–R{M})
101
+ - Teammate "section-3": Scan and classify {Section 3} (R{M+1}–R{P})
102
+ If flat list — chunk into batches of ~8–10:
103
+ - Teammate "batch-1": Scan and classify R1–R10
104
+ - Teammate "batch-2": Scan and classify R11–R20
105
+ - Teammate "batch-3": Scan and classify R21–R30
106
+ (scale teammates to match — aim for 3–5 teammates max)
107
+
108
+ Lead responsibilities:
109
+ - Distribute requirement sections to teammates
110
+ - Collect classification results from each teammate
111
+ - Resolve conflicts (two teammates found different evidence for the same code)
112
+ - Merge all results into the unified gap analysis document
113
+ - Update .gsd-t/progress.md after completion
114
+ ```
115
+
116
+ ### Fallback: Solo Mode
117
+
118
+ If agent teams are not available or there are fewer than 5 requirements, run sequentially:
119
+ - Scan the codebase for each requirement
120
+ - Read source files, test files, config, schema, contracts, and docs
121
+ - Classify each requirement with evidence
122
+
82
123
  ## Step 6: Generate Gap Analysis Document
83
124
 
84
125
  Create `.gsd-t/gap-analysis.md`:
package/package.json CHANGED
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
1
1
  {
2
2
  "name": "@tekyzinc/gsd-t",
3
- "version": "2.15.0",
3
+ "version": "2.15.2",
4
4
  "description": "GSD-T: Contract-Driven Development for Claude Code — 40 slash commands with backlog management, impact analysis, test sync, and milestone archival",
5
5
  "author": "Tekyz, Inc.",
6
6
  "license": "MIT",