@tea-agent/loop-agent 0.7.5 → 0.8.0
This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
- package/AGENTS.md +143 -142
- package/CHANGELOG.md +148 -164
- package/README.md +206 -204
- package/bin/agent-worker.js +22 -22
- package/bin/loop-agent.js +21 -21
- package/dist/commands/init.js +518 -488
- package/dist/commands/loop-benchmark.js +11 -11
- package/dist/commands/pi-reuse-benchmark.js +16 -16
- package/dist/executors/cursor-executor.js +1 -1
- package/dist/governance/manifest-types.js +1 -1
- package/dist/task/runtime.js +27 -27
- package/dist/worker/cli.js +3 -3
- package/dist/worker/observability/event-store.js +2 -1
- package/dist/worker/observability/read-model.js +13 -11
- package/dist/worker/observe/paths.js +2 -2
- package/dist/worker/observe/routes.js +4 -3
- package/dist/worker/observe/static/app.js +1479 -1480
- package/dist/worker/observe/static/dag-layout.d.ts +31 -31
- package/dist/worker/observe/static/dag-layout.js +83 -83
- package/dist/worker/observe/static/index.html +63 -63
- package/dist/worker/observe/static/styles.css +722 -722
- package/dist/worker/pool/run-store.js +7 -8
- package/dist/worker/run-task/run-task.js +11 -2
- package/dist/worker/runner/run-ready.js +1 -1
- package/dist/workflows/dag/canvas-observer.js +275 -275
- package/docs/README.md +80 -79
- package/docs/agent-dag-recovery-playbook.md +184 -184
- package/docs/agent-dag-runner.md +42 -42
- package/docs/architecture/runtime-boundaries.md +162 -162
- package/docs/cursor-executor-usage.md +25 -25
- package/docs/decisions/README.md +3 -3
- package/docs/design/README.md +49 -49
- package/docs/development-principles.md +73 -73
- package/docs/dynamic-workflow-dag-engine-roadmap.md +1749 -1749
- package/docs/exec-plans/README.md +6 -6
- package/docs/exec-plans/active/README.md +11 -11
- package/docs/exec-plans/completed/README.md +35 -34
- package/docs/feature-workflow.md +187 -187
- package/docs/harness-methodology-debugging.md +153 -153
- package/docs/harness-methodology-tdd.md +130 -130
- package/docs/harness-methodology-verification.md +27 -27
- package/docs/init-surface.manifest.json +245 -241
- package/docs/loop-agent-harness.md +63 -55
- package/docs/production-readiness.md +96 -96
- package/docs/progress/README.md +3 -3
- package/docs/reports/README.md +9 -9
- package/docs/skills/README.md +6 -6
- package/docs/skills/vetted-skill-registry.md +26 -26
- package/docs/templates/adr.md +60 -60
- package/docs/templates/agent-dag-authority-surface-audit.prompt.md +94 -94
- package/docs/templates/agent-dag-decision-envelope.schema.json +213 -213
- package/docs/templates/agent-dag-decision-gate-dogfood-report.md +117 -117
- package/docs/templates/agent-dag-decision-gate.prompt.md +246 -246
- package/docs/templates/agent-dag-process-supervisor.prompt.md +98 -98
- package/docs/templates/agent-dag-report.schema.json +454 -454
- package/docs/templates/agent-dag-review-verdict.prompt.md +68 -68
- package/docs/templates/agent-dag.base.json +195 -195
- package/docs/templates/agent-dag.final-verification.json +190 -190
- package/docs/templates/agent-dag.schema.json +316 -316
- package/docs/templates/agent-dag.supervised-implementation.json +500 -500
- package/docs/templates/exec-plan.md +64 -64
- package/docs/templates/feature-spec.md +53 -53
- package/docs/templates/harness.schema.json +218 -0
- package/docs/templates/hybrid-dag.json +193 -193
- package/docs/templates/init-evolution-review.md +33 -33
- package/docs/templates/interactive-ui-round2-experiment.md +66 -66
- package/docs/templates/product-line/AGENTS.md +8 -8
- package/docs/templates/product-line/README.md +9 -9
- package/docs/templates/product-line/acceptance.yaml +14 -14
- package/docs/templates/product-line/closeout.yaml +9 -9
- package/docs/templates/product-line/design.md +13 -13
- package/docs/templates/product-line/links.md +10 -10
- package/docs/templates/product-line/requirement.md +17 -17
- package/docs/templates/product-line/task-graph.yaml +15 -15
- package/docs/templates/product-line/task.yaml +65 -65
- package/docs/templates/product-line/test-plan.md +7 -7
- package/docs/templates/production-readiness-checklist.md +57 -57
- package/docs/templates/progress-log.md +17 -17
- package/docs/templates/project-start-checklist.md +9 -9
- package/docs/templates/qa-report.md +48 -48
- package/docs/templates/sprint-contract.md +29 -29
- package/docs/templates/worker-dogfood-evidence.md +52 -52
- package/docs/templates/worker-dogfood-setup.md +48 -48
- package/docs/verification-matrix.md +49 -49
- package/examples/decision-gate-agent-dag.json +123 -123
- package/examples/example-dag.json +51 -51
- package/examples/hybrid-loop-agent-dag.json +194 -194
- package/harness.json +73 -71
- package/package.json +68 -67
- package/scripts/check-product-line-docs.sh +22 -22
- package/scripts/check-task-pool-root.sh +32 -0
- package/skills/ai-engineering-context/SKILL.md +48 -48
- package/skills/code-review-core/SKILL.md +20 -20
- package/skills/codebase-scout/SKILL.md +19 -19
- package/skills/init-capability-evolution/SKILL.md +69 -69
- package/skills/loop-agent/SKILL.md +149 -149
- package/skills/loop-agent/references/README.md +67 -67
- package/skills/loop-agent/references/command-reference.md +432 -412
- package/skills/loop-agent/references/harness-policy.md +263 -263
- package/skills/loop-agent/references/hybrid-dag.md +216 -216
- package/skills/loop-agent/references/learned/README.md +21 -21
- package/skills/loop-agent/references/long-running-loop.md +59 -59
- package/skills/loop-agent/references/model-routing.md +36 -36
- package/skills/loop-agent/references/multi-worktree.md +54 -54
- package/skills/loop-agent/references/one-shot-runs.md +85 -85
- package/skills/loop-agent/references/orchestrator-and-interventions.md +169 -169
- package/skills/loop-agent/references/pi-prompt.md +23 -23
- package/skills/loop-agent/references/pi-subagent-assisted-mode.md +81 -81
- package/skills/loop-agent/references/post-implementation-and-patterns.md +44 -44
- package/skills/loop-agent/references/task-workflow.md +89 -89
- package/skills/loop-agent/references/verification-and-failure-handling.md +128 -128
- package/skills/requesting-code-review/SKILL.md +101 -101
- package/skills/requesting-code-review/code-reviewer.md +168 -168
- package/skills/systematic-debugging/CREATION-LOG.md +119 -119
- package/skills/systematic-debugging/SKILL.md +296 -296
- package/skills/systematic-debugging/condition-based-waiting-example.ts +158 -158
- package/skills/systematic-debugging/condition-based-waiting.md +115 -115
- package/skills/systematic-debugging/defense-in-depth.md +122 -122
- package/skills/systematic-debugging/find-polluter.sh +63 -63
- package/skills/systematic-debugging/root-cause-tracing.md +169 -169
- package/skills/systematic-debugging/test-academic.md +14 -14
- package/skills/systematic-debugging/test-pressure-1.md +58 -58
- package/skills/systematic-debugging/test-pressure-2.md +68 -68
- package/skills/systematic-debugging/test-pressure-3.md +69 -69
- package/skills/test-driven-development/SKILL.md +20 -20
- package/skills/verification-before-completion/SKILL.md +154 -154
- package/skills/webapp-testing/SKILL.md +19 -19
|
@@ -1,119 +1,119 @@
|
|
|
1
|
-
# Creation Log: Systematic Debugging Skill
|
|
2
|
-
|
|
3
|
-
提取、结构化与 bulletproofing 关键 skill 的 reference example。
|
|
4
|
-
|
|
5
|
-
## Source Material
|
|
6
|
-
|
|
7
|
-
从 `~/.claude/CLAUDE.md` 提取 debugging framework:
|
|
8
|
-
- 4-phase systematic process(Investigation → Pattern Analysis → Hypothesis → Implementation)
|
|
9
|
-
- Core mandate:ALWAYS find root cause,NEVER fix symptoms
|
|
10
|
-
- 设计以 resist time pressure 与 rationalization 的规则
|
|
11
|
-
|
|
12
|
-
## Extraction Decisions
|
|
13
|
-
|
|
14
|
-
**What to include:**
|
|
15
|
-
- 完整 4-phase framework 及所有 rules
|
|
16
|
-
- Anti-shortcuts("NEVER fix symptom"、"STOP and re-analyze")
|
|
17
|
-
- Pressure-resistant language("even if faster"、"even if I seem in a hurry")
|
|
18
|
-
- 各 phase 的 concrete steps
|
|
19
|
-
|
|
20
|
-
**What to leave out:**
|
|
21
|
-
- Project-specific context
|
|
22
|
-
- 同一 rule 的 repetitive variations
|
|
23
|
-
- Narrative explanations(condensed 为 principles)
|
|
24
|
-
|
|
25
|
-
## Structure Following skill-creation/SKILL.md
|
|
26
|
-
|
|
27
|
-
1. **Rich when_to_use** — 含 symptoms 与 anti-patterns
|
|
28
|
-
2. **Type: technique** — 带 steps 的 concrete process
|
|
29
|
-
3. **Keywords** — "root cause"、"symptom"、"workaround"、"debugging"、"investigation"
|
|
30
|
-
4. **Flowchart** — "fix failed" 决策点 → re-analyze vs add more fixes
|
|
31
|
-
5. **Phase-by-phase breakdown** — Scannable checklist format
|
|
32
|
-
6. **Anti-patterns section** — 什么 NOT to do(对本 skill 关键)
|
|
33
|
-
|
|
34
|
-
## Bulletproofing Elements
|
|
35
|
-
|
|
36
|
-
Framework 设计以 resist rationalization under pressure:
|
|
37
|
-
|
|
38
|
-
### Language Choices
|
|
39
|
-
- "ALWAYS" / "NEVER"(非 "should" / "try to")
|
|
40
|
-
- "even if faster" / "even if I seem in a hurry"
|
|
41
|
-
- "STOP and re-analyze"(explicit pause)
|
|
42
|
-
- "Don't skip past"(捕获 actual behavior)
|
|
43
|
-
|
|
44
|
-
### Structural Defenses
|
|
45
|
-
- **Phase 1 required** — 不能 skip to implementation
|
|
46
|
-
- **Single hypothesis rule** — 强制思考,防止 shotgun fixes
|
|
47
|
-
- **Explicit failure mode** — "IF your first fix doesn't work" 及 mandatory action
|
|
48
|
-
- **Anti-patterns section** — 展示 shortcuts 的确切样子
|
|
49
|
-
|
|
50
|
-
### Redundancy
|
|
51
|
-
- Root cause mandate 在 overview + when_to_use + Phase 1 + implementation rules
|
|
52
|
-
- "NEVER fix symptom" 在不同 contexts 出现 4 次
|
|
53
|
-
- 各 phase 有 explicit "don't skip" guidance
|
|
54
|
-
|
|
55
|
-
## Testing Approach
|
|
56
|
-
|
|
57
|
-
按 skills/meta/testing-skills-with-subagents 创建 4 个 validation tests:
|
|
58
|
-
|
|
59
|
-
### Test 1: Academic Context (No Pressure)
|
|
60
|
-
- Simple bug,无 time pressure
|
|
61
|
-
- **Result:** Perfect compliance,complete investigation
|
|
62
|
-
|
|
63
|
-
### Test 2: Time Pressure + Obvious Quick Fix
|
|
64
|
-
- User "in a hurry",symptom fix 看起来 easy
|
|
65
|
-
- **Result:** Resisted shortcut,followed full process,found real root cause
|
|
66
|
-
|
|
67
|
-
### Test 3: Complex System + Uncertainty
|
|
68
|
-
- Multi-layer failure, unclear 能否 find root cause
|
|
69
|
-
- **Result:** Systematic investigation,traced through all layers,found source
|
|
70
|
-
|
|
71
|
-
### Test 4: Failed First Fix
|
|
72
|
-
- Hypothesis 无效,temptation 加 more fixes
|
|
73
|
-
- **Result:** Stopped,re-analyzed,formed new hypothesis(no shotgun)
|
|
74
|
-
|
|
75
|
-
**All tests passed.** No rationalizations found.
|
|
76
|
-
|
|
77
|
-
## Iterations
|
|
78
|
-
|
|
79
|
-
### Initial Version
|
|
80
|
-
- Complete 4-phase framework
|
|
81
|
-
- Anti-patterns section
|
|
82
|
-
- Flowchart for "fix failed" decision
|
|
83
|
-
|
|
84
|
-
### Enhancement 1: TDD Reference
|
|
85
|
-
- Added link to skills/testing/test-driven-development
|
|
86
|
-
- Note explaining TDD's "simplest code" ≠ debugging's "root cause"
|
|
87
|
-
- Prevents confusion between methodologies
|
|
88
|
-
|
|
89
|
-
## Final Outcome
|
|
90
|
-
|
|
91
|
-
Bulletproof skill that:
|
|
92
|
-
- ✅ Clearly mandates root cause investigation
|
|
93
|
-
- ✅ Resists time pressure rationalization
|
|
94
|
-
- ✅ Provides concrete steps for each phase
|
|
95
|
-
- ✅ Shows anti-patterns explicitly
|
|
96
|
-
- ✅ Tested under multiple pressure scenarios
|
|
97
|
-
- ✅ Clarifies relationship to TDD
|
|
98
|
-
- ✅ Ready for use
|
|
99
|
-
|
|
100
|
-
## Key Insight
|
|
101
|
-
|
|
102
|
-
**Most important bulletproofing:** Anti-patterns section 展示 moment 里 feel justified 的 exact shortcuts。当 Claude 想 "I'll just add this one quick fix",看到 listed as wrong 的 exact pattern 产生 cognitive friction。
|
|
103
|
-
|
|
104
|
-
## Usage Example
|
|
105
|
-
|
|
106
|
-
遇到 bug 时:
|
|
107
|
-
1. Load skill: skills/debugging/systematic-debugging
|
|
108
|
-
2. Read overview (10 sec) — reminded of mandate
|
|
109
|
-
3. Follow Phase 1 checklist — forced investigation
|
|
110
|
-
4. If tempted to skip — see anti-pattern,stop
|
|
111
|
-
5. Complete all phases — root cause found
|
|
112
|
-
|
|
113
|
-
**Time investment:** 5-10 minutes
|
|
114
|
-
**Time saved:** Hours of symptom-whack-a-mole
|
|
115
|
-
|
|
116
|
-
---
|
|
117
|
-
|
|
118
|
-
*Created: 2025-10-03*
|
|
119
|
-
*Purpose: Reference example for skill extraction and bulletproofing*
|
|
1
|
+
# Creation Log: Systematic Debugging Skill
|
|
2
|
+
|
|
3
|
+
提取、结构化与 bulletproofing 关键 skill 的 reference example。
|
|
4
|
+
|
|
5
|
+
## Source Material
|
|
6
|
+
|
|
7
|
+
从 `~/.claude/CLAUDE.md` 提取 debugging framework:
|
|
8
|
+
- 4-phase systematic process(Investigation → Pattern Analysis → Hypothesis → Implementation)
|
|
9
|
+
- Core mandate:ALWAYS find root cause,NEVER fix symptoms
|
|
10
|
+
- 设计以 resist time pressure 与 rationalization 的规则
|
|
11
|
+
|
|
12
|
+
## Extraction Decisions
|
|
13
|
+
|
|
14
|
+
**What to include:**
|
|
15
|
+
- 完整 4-phase framework 及所有 rules
|
|
16
|
+
- Anti-shortcuts("NEVER fix symptom"、"STOP and re-analyze")
|
|
17
|
+
- Pressure-resistant language("even if faster"、"even if I seem in a hurry")
|
|
18
|
+
- 各 phase 的 concrete steps
|
|
19
|
+
|
|
20
|
+
**What to leave out:**
|
|
21
|
+
- Project-specific context
|
|
22
|
+
- 同一 rule 的 repetitive variations
|
|
23
|
+
- Narrative explanations(condensed 为 principles)
|
|
24
|
+
|
|
25
|
+
## Structure Following skill-creation/SKILL.md
|
|
26
|
+
|
|
27
|
+
1. **Rich when_to_use** — 含 symptoms 与 anti-patterns
|
|
28
|
+
2. **Type: technique** — 带 steps 的 concrete process
|
|
29
|
+
3. **Keywords** — "root cause"、"symptom"、"workaround"、"debugging"、"investigation"
|
|
30
|
+
4. **Flowchart** — "fix failed" 决策点 → re-analyze vs add more fixes
|
|
31
|
+
5. **Phase-by-phase breakdown** — Scannable checklist format
|
|
32
|
+
6. **Anti-patterns section** — 什么 NOT to do(对本 skill 关键)
|
|
33
|
+
|
|
34
|
+
## Bulletproofing Elements
|
|
35
|
+
|
|
36
|
+
Framework 设计以 resist rationalization under pressure:
|
|
37
|
+
|
|
38
|
+
### Language Choices
|
|
39
|
+
- "ALWAYS" / "NEVER"(非 "should" / "try to")
|
|
40
|
+
- "even if faster" / "even if I seem in a hurry"
|
|
41
|
+
- "STOP and re-analyze"(explicit pause)
|
|
42
|
+
- "Don't skip past"(捕获 actual behavior)
|
|
43
|
+
|
|
44
|
+
### Structural Defenses
|
|
45
|
+
- **Phase 1 required** — 不能 skip to implementation
|
|
46
|
+
- **Single hypothesis rule** — 强制思考,防止 shotgun fixes
|
|
47
|
+
- **Explicit failure mode** — "IF your first fix doesn't work" 及 mandatory action
|
|
48
|
+
- **Anti-patterns section** — 展示 shortcuts 的确切样子
|
|
49
|
+
|
|
50
|
+
### Redundancy
|
|
51
|
+
- Root cause mandate 在 overview + when_to_use + Phase 1 + implementation rules
|
|
52
|
+
- "NEVER fix symptom" 在不同 contexts 出现 4 次
|
|
53
|
+
- 各 phase 有 explicit "don't skip" guidance
|
|
54
|
+
|
|
55
|
+
## Testing Approach
|
|
56
|
+
|
|
57
|
+
按 skills/meta/testing-skills-with-subagents 创建 4 个 validation tests:
|
|
58
|
+
|
|
59
|
+
### Test 1: Academic Context (No Pressure)
|
|
60
|
+
- Simple bug,无 time pressure
|
|
61
|
+
- **Result:** Perfect compliance,complete investigation
|
|
62
|
+
|
|
63
|
+
### Test 2: Time Pressure + Obvious Quick Fix
|
|
64
|
+
- User "in a hurry",symptom fix 看起来 easy
|
|
65
|
+
- **Result:** Resisted shortcut,followed full process,found real root cause
|
|
66
|
+
|
|
67
|
+
### Test 3: Complex System + Uncertainty
|
|
68
|
+
- Multi-layer failure, unclear 能否 find root cause
|
|
69
|
+
- **Result:** Systematic investigation,traced through all layers,found source
|
|
70
|
+
|
|
71
|
+
### Test 4: Failed First Fix
|
|
72
|
+
- Hypothesis 无效,temptation 加 more fixes
|
|
73
|
+
- **Result:** Stopped,re-analyzed,formed new hypothesis(no shotgun)
|
|
74
|
+
|
|
75
|
+
**All tests passed.** No rationalizations found.
|
|
76
|
+
|
|
77
|
+
## Iterations
|
|
78
|
+
|
|
79
|
+
### Initial Version
|
|
80
|
+
- Complete 4-phase framework
|
|
81
|
+
- Anti-patterns section
|
|
82
|
+
- Flowchart for "fix failed" decision
|
|
83
|
+
|
|
84
|
+
### Enhancement 1: TDD Reference
|
|
85
|
+
- Added link to skills/testing/test-driven-development
|
|
86
|
+
- Note explaining TDD's "simplest code" ≠ debugging's "root cause"
|
|
87
|
+
- Prevents confusion between methodologies
|
|
88
|
+
|
|
89
|
+
## Final Outcome
|
|
90
|
+
|
|
91
|
+
Bulletproof skill that:
|
|
92
|
+
- ✅ Clearly mandates root cause investigation
|
|
93
|
+
- ✅ Resists time pressure rationalization
|
|
94
|
+
- ✅ Provides concrete steps for each phase
|
|
95
|
+
- ✅ Shows anti-patterns explicitly
|
|
96
|
+
- ✅ Tested under multiple pressure scenarios
|
|
97
|
+
- ✅ Clarifies relationship to TDD
|
|
98
|
+
- ✅ Ready for use
|
|
99
|
+
|
|
100
|
+
## Key Insight
|
|
101
|
+
|
|
102
|
+
**Most important bulletproofing:** Anti-patterns section 展示 moment 里 feel justified 的 exact shortcuts。当 Claude 想 "I'll just add this one quick fix",看到 listed as wrong 的 exact pattern 产生 cognitive friction。
|
|
103
|
+
|
|
104
|
+
## Usage Example
|
|
105
|
+
|
|
106
|
+
遇到 bug 时:
|
|
107
|
+
1. Load skill: skills/debugging/systematic-debugging
|
|
108
|
+
2. Read overview (10 sec) — reminded of mandate
|
|
109
|
+
3. Follow Phase 1 checklist — forced investigation
|
|
110
|
+
4. If tempted to skip — see anti-pattern,stop
|
|
111
|
+
5. Complete all phases — root cause found
|
|
112
|
+
|
|
113
|
+
**Time investment:** 5-10 minutes
|
|
114
|
+
**Time saved:** Hours of symptom-whack-a-mole
|
|
115
|
+
|
|
116
|
+
---
|
|
117
|
+
|
|
118
|
+
*Created: 2025-10-03*
|
|
119
|
+
*Purpose: Reference example for skill extraction and bulletproofing*
|