@tea-agent/loop-agent 0.35.3 → 0.35.4-beta.0

package/CHANGELOG.md

@@ -1,6 +1,17 @@
 # 更新日志
 
-## [Unreleased]
+## [0.35.4-beta.0] - 2026-08-15
+
+> frontend prewrite 阻断误路由修正 + Mock 契约文档落地（beta，发布到 `beta` dist-tag）。
+
+### 改进
+
+- prewrite 阻断导致的 writer `SKIPPED`（`skippedReason=frontend-prewrite-not-authorized`）失败路由从 `DependencyFailure`/`unblock dependency` 修正为 `ContractMismatch`/`fix-frontend-task-contract-and-regenerate-dag`；`dag report` / `dag doctor` 透传 `skippedReason`，对「Mock 策略契约缺陷需改 task.json + 重新生成 DAG」这类场景给出可操作建议，而非误导性的「解除依赖」
+
+### 文档
+
+- `docs/templates/frontend-task-constraints.md` 的 Mock 约束从 TODO 改为可落地契约：要求从项目**探索**实际存在的确定性 Mock 验证命令（不硬编码命令名）并声明到 `task.json.frontendMock.verifyCommands`，说明生成期 `allowedMockStrategies` 来源、`mock-strategy-outside-allowed` 是生成期契约问题（修复 = 补契约 + 重新生成 DAG，plan-revision 无法修复）
+- `docs/runtime/frontend-implementation-workflow.md` 的 task.json 输入标准补充 Mock 契约声明、命令探索与失败恢复指引
 
 ## [0.35.3] - 2026-08-15
 

package/dist/build-stamp.json

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 {
   "schemaVersion": 1,
-  "version": "0.35.3",
-  "gitSha": "71e2505bbabe052302d753f25b4971e0bdb0f953",
-  "builtAt": "2026-08-15T11:42:48.937Z"
+  "version": "0.35.4-beta.0",
+  "gitSha": "53128a51ad1db646a5fd8184d2de882a1a2211ee",
+  "builtAt": "2026-08-15T15:18:26.580Z"
 }

package/dist/workflows/dag/failure-routing.js

@@ -44,7 +44,9 @@ function routeToProductLine(input) {
         case "decision-envelope":
             return "NeedsHuman";
         case "skipped":
-            return "DependencyFailure";
+            return input.skippedReason === "frontend-prewrite-not-authorized"
+                ? "ContractMismatch"
+                : "DependencyFailure";
         case "shell-command":
             if (/\b(ENOENT|PATH|command not found|No such file|not found in PATH|bash: .*: No such file)\b/i.test(raw)) {
                 return "EnvFailure";
@@ -90,9 +92,12 @@ export function routeDagFailure(input) {
     if (!productLineFailureCategory)
         return {};
     const recommendedFollowUp = productLineFailureCategory === "ContractMismatch" &&
-        isFrontendDesignGateNode(input.nodeId ?? "")
-        ? "frontend-plan-revision-and-rerun"
-        : FOLLOW_UP_BY_PRODUCT_LINE[productLineFailureCategory];
+        input.skippedReason === "frontend-prewrite-not-authorized"
+        ? "fix-frontend-task-contract-and-regenerate-dag"
+        : productLineFailureCategory === "ContractMismatch" &&
+            isFrontendDesignGateNode(input.nodeId ?? "")
+            ? "frontend-plan-revision-and-rerun"
+            : FOLLOW_UP_BY_PRODUCT_LINE[productLineFailureCategory];
     return {
         productLineFailureCategory,
         recommendedFollowUp,

package/dist/workflows/dag/lifecycle.js

@@ -743,6 +743,7 @@ function findDoctorFailureNode(state) {
             nodeId: state.pausedByNodeId,
             status: node?.status,
             rawFailureCategory: node?.failureCategory,
+            skippedReason: node?.skippedReason,
         };
     }
     const errorEntry = Object.entries(state.nodes).find(([, node]) => node.status === "ERROR");
@@ -758,6 +759,7 @@ function findDoctorFailureNode(state) {
         nodeId: selected[0],
         status: selected[1].status,
         rawFailureCategory: selected[1].failureCategory,
+        skippedReason: selected[1].skippedReason,
     };
 }
 async function readRunOwnedBackendTestClassification(runDir) {
@@ -786,6 +788,7 @@ async function resolveDoctorFailureRouting(input) {
             normalizedFailureCategory: "unknown",
             nodeId: input.nodeId,
             productLineFailureCategory: classifiedCategory,
+            skippedReason: input.skippedReason,
         });
     }
     return routeDagFailure(input);
@@ -807,6 +810,7 @@ async function formatDagDoctorMarkdown(repoRoot, runId) {
         rawFailureCategory,
         normalizedFailureCategory: normalizedCategory,
         nodeId: failure.nodeId,
+        skippedReason: failure.skippedReason,
     });
     const evidence = failure.nodeId
         ? path.join(located.runDir, failure.nodeId, "result.summary.md")

package/dist/workflows/dag/report.js

@@ -441,6 +441,7 @@ export async function buildDagRunReportEntry(input) {
                 normalizedFailureCategory,
                 nodeId,
                 executor: node.executor,
+                skippedReason: node.skippedReason,
             });
             const followUp = node.status === "ERROR" || node.status === "SKIPPED"
                 ? recommendFollowUpForFailureCategory(node.failureCategory)
@@ -505,6 +506,7 @@ export async function buildDagRunReportEntry(input) {
             normalizedFailureCategory: normalizeDagFailureCategory(pausedNode.failureCategory, pausedNode.status),
             failureCategory: pausedNode.failureCategory,
             nodeId: input.state.pausedByNodeId,
+            skippedReason: pausedNode.skippedReason,
         }
         : firstActionableNode
             ? {
@@ -513,6 +515,7 @@ export async function buildDagRunReportEntry(input) {
                     normalizeDagFailureCategory(firstActionableNode.failureCategory, firstActionableNode.status),
                 failureCategory: firstActionableNode.failureCategory,
                 nodeId: firstActionableNode.nodeId,
+                skippedReason: input.state.nodes[firstActionableNode.nodeId]?.skippedReason,
             }
             : {
                 status: input.state.status,
@@ -529,6 +532,9 @@ export async function buildDagRunReportEntry(input) {
         rawFailureCategory: runRecoverySource.failureCategory,
         normalizedFailureCategory: runRecoverySource.normalizedFailureCategory,
         nodeId: "nodeId" in runRecoverySource ? runRecoverySource.nodeId : undefined,
+        skippedReason: "skippedReason" in runRecoverySource
+            ? runRecoverySource.skippedReason
+            : undefined,
     });
     const runFollowUp = input.state.status === "failed" ||
         input.state.status === "partial_failed"

package/docs/templates/frontend-task-constraints.md

@@ -18,13 +18,19 @@ TODO
 
 ## Mock 约束（数据型任务）
 
-- Mock/API/schema 规范路径：TODO
-- 既有 Mock service root、handler/fixture/bootstrap：TODO
-- 既有 browser/e2e interception 或 request adapter/DI seam：TODO
-- 启动、健康检查和专项验证命令：TODO
-- production 禁用边界：TODO
-- 真实请求默认路径与 Mock 显式启用方式：TODO
-- `task.json.frontendMock.policy`：`auto | required | disabled`
+本段决定生成期 `allowedMockStrategies` 与冻结的 Mock 验证命令。只有当生成期**能证明任务确实包含 Mock 且有确定性验证命令**时，DAG 才会放行 `native` / `browser-intercept` / `request-adapter`；否则自动收敛为 `not-needed`，design review 若按项目规范改选 `native`，会在 prewrite 被 `mock-strategy-outside-allowed` 拦截、`implement` 被跳过。
+
+- **何时必须填**：项目规范（`openspec/project-specs/**`、`ai_workspace/**`、mock 规则或类似 DEC-* 决策）要求/建议 Mock；或需求涉及远端接口且后端未就绪。规范要求 Mock 时，优先 `task.json.frontendMock.policy: "required"`。
+- **命令要探索、不要硬编码**：到项目 `package.json` scripts 里找实际存在的 Mock 相关脚本（如 `mock`、`mock:*`、`dev:mock`，或名字含 mock 的脚本），结合既有 service root 的 handler/fixture/bootstrap 启动方式，确定一条**真实存在、确定、可自终止**（启动→断言→退出 0）的验证命令。常驻 dev server 必须包装成自终止脚本（start→assert→stop），否则 verify shell 会超时 fail-closed。
+- **写入 task.json**：把探索到的命令原样写进 `frontendMock.verifyCommands`（`label` 唯一、`command` 与项目脚本一致）。`label` 会进入冻结命令集，implementation contract 的 `verificationTarget.commandLabel` 必须逐字引用它。
+- **命令来源白名单**：只允许项目 `package.json` 已有脚本、Mock capability seed、或本段声明的 `verifyCommands`；plan/design 阶段不能发明 shell 命令。
+- **Mock/API/schema 规范路径**：TODO
+- **既有 Mock service root、handler/fixture/bootstrap**：TODO
+- **既有 browser/e2e interception 或 request adapter/DI seam**：TODO
+- **production 禁用边界**：TODO
+- **真实请求默认路径与 Mock 显式启用方式**：TODO
+- **`task.json.frontendMock.policy`**：`auto | required | disabled`（规范强制 Mock 用 `required`）
+- **被拦截时怎么修**：`mock-strategy-outside-allowed` / `no authorized Mock verification commands` 是**生成期契约问题，不是 plan 问题**——补 `frontendMock.verifyCommands`（或 `policy: "required"` + 命令）后**重新生成 DAG** 再跑，plan-revision 无法修复它。
 
 ## allowedPaths
 

package/package.json

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 {
   "name": "@tea-agent/loop-agent",
-  "version": "0.35.3",
+  "version": "0.35.4-beta.0",
   "type": "module",
   "bin": {
     "loop-agent": "bin/loop-agent.js",