@synap-core/workspace-templates 0.2.2 → 0.4.0

This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
@@ -288,25 +288,73 @@ entityLinks:
288
288
  type: used_in
289
289
  label: Composition
290
290
 
291
- seedEntities:
292
- - profileSlug: content-template
293
- title: Instagram Reel — Fast
294
- properties:
295
- template-kind: hyperframes
296
- aspect-ratio: "9:16"
297
- template-status: approved
298
- template-config: '{"mode":"fast","pipeline":["script","hyperframes","render"],"description":"Quick social cut: write a script, get HyperFrames HTML, browser-capture to MP4."}'
299
- - profileSlug: content-template
300
- title: Product Demo — Quality
301
- properties:
302
- template-kind: hybrid
303
- aspect-ratio: "16:9"
304
- template-status: approved
305
- template-config: '{"mode":"quality","pipeline":["script","hyperframes","remotion","render"],"description":"Premium product video: HyperFrames design exploration → Remotion production render with springs + audio sync."}'
306
- - profileSlug: content-template
307
- title: Data Recap — Data-Driven
308
- properties:
309
- template-kind: remotion
310
- aspect-ratio: "16:9"
311
- template-status: approved
312
- template-config: '{"mode":"data","pipeline":["data","remotion","render"],"description":"Synap-powered: pull entities via calculateMetadata(), animate charts, render weekly recap."}'
291
+ onboarding:
292
+ goal: Capture how you actually produce video and motion content — your real pipelines, your reusable templates, and the assets you cut from — so the studio mirrors your production line, not a generic setup.
293
+ framing: >
294
+ THE PRODUCER: Act as a seasoned motion/video production lead who has shipped
295
+ thousands of frames. This is a HyperFrames/Remotion render pipeline, NOT a
296
+ publishing calendar — anchor on how work gets MADE: formats, aspect ratios,
297
+ durations, and the templates that make output repeatable. Push for the shows
298
+ and series they actually run, not one-off ideas. Pull voice and visual identity
299
+ from Brand and target audience from Foundation so every piece lands on-brand.
300
+ Be concrete about specs; a fuzzy "we make videos" helps no one.
301
+ expertise:
302
+ starters:
303
+ - >
304
+ Produce in BATCHES, not one-at-a-time. Setup — lighting, wardrobe, template
305
+ loading, brand assets — is the real cost; shooting or composing five pieces
306
+ in one session amortizes it. Propose a batch cadence (e.g. one shoot day →
307
+ a month of cuts) rather than a per-video pipeline.
308
+ - >
309
+ The hook is 80% of the view. On a 9:16 feed the first 1–2 seconds decide
310
+ whether the piece is watched at all, so it's worth more iteration than the
311
+ rest combined. Propose a template whose title card / cold-open IS the hook,
312
+ and treat the hook as its own reusable asset.
313
+ - >
314
+ Design every shoot for REPURPOSING before you roll. One long-form capture
315
+ should yield the long cut, several vertical clips, and stills — but only if
316
+ it's framed and shot with those crops in mind. Propose the repurpose chain
317
+ up front so the raw footage is cut-once, use-many.
318
+ blindSpots:
319
+ - >
320
+ The velocity-vs-quality tradeoff is a real dial, not a failing — a weekly
321
+ show that's "good enough and on time" beats a cinematic piece that ships
322
+ quarterly. If they're chasing polish on a high-cadence line, name the
323
+ tradeoff and propose a quality bar that survives the schedule.
324
+ - >
325
+ No reusable templates = every video rebuilt from scratch, and brand drift
326
+ creeps in. If they're producing on a cadence but have no locked
327
+ intros/outros/lower-thirds, that's the gap — templates are what make output
328
+ both fast AND on-brand. Surface it.
329
+ - >
330
+ Aspect ratio and platform are a production decision, not an export
331
+ afterthought. Shooting 16:9 and cropping to 9:16 later loses the frame and
332
+ the hook. If a pipeline's platform doesn't match how it's actually shot,
333
+ flag the mismatch before it's baked into every render.
334
+ bar: >
335
+ The studio reads like a production LINE: recurring shows with locked specs,
336
+ reusable templates that carry brand into every render, and asset sources feeding
337
+ a batch-then-repurpose flow — so a producer could ship the next episode this week
338
+ without reinventing the format or fighting brand drift.
339
+ collect:
340
+ - profileSlug: content-pipeline
341
+ what: The recurring productions you run — the shows, series, or content lines that generate output on a cadence (e.g. weekly reels, product demos, explainer drops).
342
+ cardinality: few
343
+ keyFields: [pipeline-kind, pipeline-platform, pipeline-mode]
344
+ - profileSlug: content-template
345
+ what: The reusable HyperFrames/Remotion templates that make production repeatable — your title cards, lower-thirds, intros/outros, and full-video shells. These carry Brand voice and visual identity into every render.
346
+ cardinality: several
347
+ keyFields: [template-kind, aspect-ratio, template-status]
348
+ - profileSlug: content-asset
349
+ what: The asset sources you cut from — brand footage, stock, audio/music beds, and fonts. Note whether each comes from Brand, is uploaded, or is generated.
350
+ cardinality: several
351
+ keyFields: [asset-kind, source-kind, source-url]
352
+ - profileSlug: content-composition
353
+ what: Any compositions already in flight — specific videos being built, with their aspect ratio and duration, tied back to a pipeline.
354
+ cardinality: few
355
+ keyFields: [aspect-ratio, duration-seconds, pipeline-ref]
356
+ openingQuestions:
357
+ - "What do you actually produce on repeat — the shows or series, and for which platforms and aspect ratios?"
358
+ - "Which motion templates do you reuse every time — intros, lower-thirds, outros — and are they HyperFrames, Remotion, or hybrid?"
359
+ - "Where do your assets come from — Brand footage and fonts, uploaded clips, or AI-generated — and where do you pull music from?"
360
+ doneWhen: at least one pipeline + one reusable template + one asset source captured.
package/src/crm.yaml CHANGED
@@ -620,6 +620,64 @@ profiles:
620
620
  - healthy
621
621
  - at_risk
622
622
  - critical
623
+ - slug: partner
624
+ displayName: Partner
625
+ icon: handshake
626
+ color: teal
627
+ description: A partner relationship — both a referral source and a co-delivery collaborator, distinguished by partner type.
628
+ properties:
629
+ - slug: partnerStatus
630
+ label: Status
631
+ valueType: string
632
+ inputType: select
633
+ enumValues:
634
+ - active
635
+ - paused
636
+ - churned
637
+ - slug: partnerType
638
+ label: Partner Type
639
+ valueType: string
640
+ inputType: select
641
+ enumValues:
642
+ - referral
643
+ - co-delivery
644
+ - both
645
+ - slug: accountManager
646
+ label: Account Manager
647
+ valueType: string
648
+ inputType: text
649
+ - slug: engagementStartDate
650
+ label: Engagement Start
651
+ valueType: date
652
+ inputType: date
653
+ - slug: satisfactionScore
654
+ label: Satisfaction
655
+ valueType: number
656
+ inputType: number
657
+ - slug: lifetimeValue
658
+ label: Lifetime Value
659
+ valueType: number
660
+ inputType: number
661
+ - slug: notes
662
+ label: Notes
663
+ valueType: string
664
+ inputType: textarea
665
+ - slug: contractValue
666
+ label: Contract Value
667
+ valueType: number
668
+ inputType: number
669
+ - slug: renewalDate
670
+ label: Renewal Date
671
+ valueType: date
672
+ inputType: date
673
+ - slug: healthScore
674
+ label: Health
675
+ valueType: string
676
+ inputType: select
677
+ enumValues:
678
+ - healthy
679
+ - at_risk
680
+ - critical
623
681
  - slug: contact
624
682
  displayName: Contact
625
683
  icon: user
@@ -1555,429 +1613,21 @@ entityLinks:
1555
1613
  - sourceProfileSlug: deal
1556
1614
  targetProfileSlug: pipeline
1557
1615
  type: belongs_to
1558
- seedEntities:
1559
- - profileSlug: company
1560
- title: Lumio Technologies
1561
- properties:
1562
- company-status: Prospect
1563
- industry: SaaS
1564
- company-size: 51-200
1565
- arr: 0
1566
- website: https://lumio.io
1567
- location: Paris, France
1568
- health-score: 72
1569
- account-owner: Antoine
1570
- last-contact-date: "2026-02-10"
1571
- company-tags:
1572
- - ai
1573
- - b2b
1574
- - priority
1575
- notes: Interested in the data sovereignty angle. CTO is hands-on.
1576
- - profileSlug: company
1577
- title: Meridian Finance
1578
- properties:
1579
- company-status: Customer
1580
- industry: Fintech
1581
- company-size: 201-500
1582
- arr: 48000
1583
- website: https://meridianfinance.eu
1584
- location: Brussels, Belgium
1585
- health-score: 88
1586
- account-owner: Antoine
1587
- last-contact-date: "2026-02-18"
1588
- company-tags:
1589
- - fintech
1590
- - gdpr-sensitive
1591
- - expansion
1592
- notes: Renewing Q1. Explore expansion into compliance module.
1593
- content: |-
1594
- # Account Brief: Meridian Finance
1595
-
1596
- ## Overview
1597
-
1598
- Meridian Finance is a mid-market financial advisory firm (201-500 employees) using Synap since Q3 2024. Currently on the Business plan (€1,400/month, 25 seats). This renewal cycle also includes an expansion conversation — compliance team wants to onboard (additional 15 seats).
1599
-
1600
- ## Relationship health
1601
-
1602
- - **Health score**: 82/100
1603
- - **Primary contact**: Marcus Holt (VP Operations) — strong champion, uses Synap daily for deal tracking and team coordination
1604
- - **Usage**: High. 22 of 25 seats active. Core use cases: deal pipeline, client note-taking, compliance log
1605
-
1606
- ## Renewal context
1607
-
1608
- Contract expires March 31, 2026. Marcus initiated the renewal conversation proactively in January — positive signal. The expansion request (compliance team) was his idea, not a upsell push from our side.
1609
-
1610
- **Current**: €1,400/month × 12 = €16,800/year
1611
- **Proposed renewal + expansion**: €1,950/month × 12 = €23,400/year (+39%)
1612
-
1613
- ## Risk factors
1614
-
1615
- - CFO is new (joined January 2026) — unknown stance on SaaS spend
1616
- - Competing internal proposal to consolidate on Microsoft 365 (SharePoint + Viva)
1617
- - Marcus has confirmed he's advocating for Synap but may need us to provide ROI data
1618
-
1619
- ## Strategy
1620
-
1621
- Lead with usage data and ROI framing. Get Marcus a one-pager he can share with the new CFO. The Microsoft consolidation risk is real — need to position Synap as complementary to M365, not competing with it.
1622
- - profileSlug: company
1623
- title: Arko Health
1624
- properties:
1625
- company-status: Active
1626
- industry: Healthcare
1627
- company-size: 11-50
1628
- arr: 18000
1629
- website: https://arkohealth.com
1630
- location: Lyon, France
1631
- health-score: 55
1632
- account-owner: Sophie
1633
- last-contact-date: "2026-01-28"
1634
- company-tags:
1635
- - healthcare
1636
- - at-risk
1637
- notes: Usage dropped last month. Schedule QBR.
1638
- - profileSlug: contact
1639
- title: Camille Renard
1640
- properties:
1641
- contact-role: Champion
1642
- contact-status: Active
1643
- job-title: CTO
1644
- company-name: ref:company:Lumio Technologies
1645
- email: c.renard@lumio.io
1646
- phone: +33 6 12 34 56 78
1647
- linkedin: https://linkedin.com/in/camillerenard
1648
- lead-score: 84
1649
- contact-source: LinkedIn
1650
- contact-owner: Antoine
1651
- last-interaction: "2026-02-10"
1652
- contact-tags:
1653
- - technical
1654
- - champion
1655
- - decision-maker
1656
- - profileSlug: contact
1657
- title: Marcus Holt
1658
- properties:
1659
- contact-role: Decision Maker
1660
- contact-status: Active
1661
- job-title: VP of Operations
1662
- company-name: ref:company:Meridian Finance
1663
- email: m.holt@meridianfinance.eu
1664
- phone: +32 2 555 0198
1665
- linkedin: https://linkedin.com/in/marcusholt
1666
- lead-score: 91
1667
- contact-source: Referral
1668
- contact-owner: Antoine
1669
- last-interaction: "2026-02-18"
1670
- contact-tags:
1671
- - renewal
1672
- - expansion-potential
1673
- - profileSlug: contact
1674
- title: Isabelle Moreau
1675
- properties:
1676
- contact-role: Lead
1677
- contact-status: Nurturing
1678
- job-title: Head of Digital
1679
- company-name: ref:company:Arko Health
1680
- email: i.moreau@arkohealth.com
1681
- lead-score: 47
1682
- contact-source: Event
1683
- contact-owner: Sophie
1684
- last-interaction: "2026-01-28"
1685
- contact-tags:
1686
- - healthcare
1687
- - nurture
1688
- - profileSlug: deal
1689
- title: Lumio — Data Pod Enterprise Licence
1690
- properties:
1691
- stage: Proposal
1692
- deal-value: 36000
1693
- probability: 60
1694
- close-date: "2026-03-31"
1695
- deal-type: New Business
1696
- deal-company: ref:company:Lumio Technologies
1697
- deal-contact: ref:contact:Camille Renard
1698
- deal-owner: Antoine
1699
- next-action: Send revised proposal with compliance annex
1700
- next-action-date: "2026-02-25"
1701
- deal-source: Outbound
1702
- deal-tags:
1703
- - q1
1704
- - priority
1705
- - enterprise
1706
- content: |-
1707
- # Deal Brief: Lumio Technologies — Data Pod Enterprise Licence
1708
-
1709
- ## Opportunity summary
1710
-
1711
- Lumio Technologies is evaluating Synap as the data infrastructure layer for their internal knowledge management and client-facing data operations. Decision maker is Camille Renard (Head of Engineering), with budget authority sitting with the CTO (François Leroy, not yet in contact).
1712
-
1713
- - **Stage**: Proposal
1714
- - **Value**: €28,000 / year
1715
- - **Close target**: March 31, 2026
1716
- - **Win probability**: 65%
1717
-
1718
- ## Why they're looking
1719
-
1720
- Lumio's current stack is fragmented: Notion for internal docs, HubSpot for client data, Airtable for project tracking. No single system of record. The data sovereignty angle resonates strongly — they've had two incidents in the last year where vendor downtime blocked client deliverables.
1721
-
1722
- ## Competitive situation
1723
-
1724
- Evaluating three options: Synap, a custom-built internal tool, and extending their current Notion setup. The custom-build option is losing traction (engineering bandwidth is constrained). Synap vs. extended Notion is the real comparison.
1725
-
1726
- ## Win conditions
1727
-
1728
- 1. Demo showing cross-entity relationships — specifically, linking client records to project entities to activity logs
1729
- 2. Self-hosting option confirmed for their EU data residency requirement
1730
- 3. Pricing flexibility on seat count (currently 12 users, may scale to 30+)
1731
-
1732
- ## Next actions
1733
-
1734
- - [ ] Send proposal deck with custom pricing table (by Feb 28)
1735
- - [ ] Schedule technical session with François Leroy
1736
- - [ ] Confirm self-hosting deployment timeline with engineering team
1737
- - profileSlug: deal
1738
- title: Meridian Finance — 2026 Renewal + Expansion
1739
- properties:
1740
- stage: Negotiation
1741
- deal-value: 72000
1742
- probability: 85
1743
- close-date: "2026-03-15"
1744
- deal-type: Renewal
1745
- deal-company: ref:company:Meridian Finance
1746
- deal-contact: ref:contact:Marcus Holt
1747
- deal-owner: Antoine
1748
- next-action: Final contract review call
1749
- next-action-date: "2026-02-26"
1750
- deal-source: Inbound
1751
- deal-tags:
1752
- - renewal
1753
- - expansion
1754
- - q1-close
1755
- - profileSlug: deal
1756
- title: Arko Health — Starter Workspace
1757
- properties:
1758
- stage: Qualified
1759
- deal-value: 9600
1760
- probability: 35
1761
- close-date: "2026-04-30"
1762
- deal-type: New Business
1763
- deal-company: ref:company:Arko Health
1764
- deal-contact: ref:contact:Isabelle Moreau
1765
- deal-owner: Sophie
1766
- next-action: Send case study from healthcare client
1767
- next-action-date: "2026-03-01"
1768
- deal-source: Event
1769
- deal-tags:
1770
- - healthcare
1771
- - at-risk
1772
- - q2
1773
- - profileSlug: deal
1774
- title: Vanta Labs — Pilot Evaluation
1775
- properties:
1776
- stage: Prospecting
1777
- deal-value: 24000
1778
- probability: 20
1779
- close-date: "2026-05-15"
1780
- deal-type: New Business
1781
- deal-company: ref:company:Vanta Labs
1782
- deal-contact: ref:contact:Thomas Geiger
1783
- deal-owner: Antoine
1784
- next-action: Discovery call scheduled
1785
- next-action-date: "2026-02-28"
1786
- deal-source: Outbound
1787
- deal-tags:
1788
- - pilot
1789
- - early-stage
1790
- - profileSlug: activity
1791
- title: Product demo — Lumio CTO
1792
- properties:
1793
- activity-type: Demo
1794
- activity-date: "2026-02-10"
1795
- activity-status: Completed
1796
- activity-outcome: Positive
1797
- related-company: ref:company:Lumio Technologies
1798
- related-contact: ref:contact:Camille Renard
1799
- related-deal: ref:deal:Lumio — Data Pod Enterprise Licence
1800
- activity-owner: Antoine
1801
- summary: Ran full platform demo. Strong reaction to the relationship graph and pod sovereignty model. Asked for compliance documentation.
1802
- duration-min: 60
1803
- content: |-
1804
- # Product Demo — Lumio Technologies
1805
-
1806
- **Date**: February 10, 2026
1807
- **Attendees**: Camille Renard (Head of Engineering, Lumio), Antoine (Synap)
1808
- **Type**: Demo
1809
- **Outcome**: Positive
1810
-
1811
- ## What we covered
1812
-
1813
- Ran a 45-minute walkthrough of Synap's entity model, focusing on cross-profile relationships. Specifically demoed:
1814
-
1815
- 1. A Company entity with linked Contacts, Deals, and Activity log — all from one view
1816
- 2. The graph view showing the relationship map across entity types
1817
- 3. Bento dashboard with live entity counts and feed
1818
-
1819
- Camille's reaction to the graph view: "This is what we've been trying to build manually in Notion for two years."
1820
-
1821
- ## Key objections raised
1822
-
1823
- - **Self-hosting**: They need EU data residency. Confirmed Synap supports self-hosted deployment. Need to send technical docs.
1824
- - **Migration**: Existing Notion data (~3,000 pages). Asked about import tooling — told them CSV import is live, full Notion export support in Q2 roadmap.
1825
- - **Seat pricing**: Currently 12 users but expects to grow. Agreed to discuss volume pricing in proposal.
1826
-
1827
- ## Commitments made
1828
-
1829
- - Antoine: Send proposal by Feb 28 with custom pricing for 12-30 seat range
1830
- - Antoine: Intro Camille to engineering team for self-hosting technical session
1831
- - Camille: Get François Leroy (CTO) into next call
1832
-
1833
- ## Assessment
1834
-
1835
- High intent. The data sovereignty framing landed. Biggest risk is the CTO not prioritizing before Q1 close — need to get him into the room before March 15.
1836
- - profileSlug: activity
1837
- title: Renewal negotiation call — Meridian
1838
- properties:
1839
- activity-type: Call
1840
- activity-date: "2026-02-18"
1841
- activity-status: Completed
1842
- activity-outcome: Positive
1843
- related-company: ref:company:Meridian Finance
1844
- related-contact: ref:contact:Marcus Holt
1845
- related-deal: ref:deal:Meridian Finance — 2026 Renewal + Expansion
1846
- activity-owner: Antoine
1847
- summary: Aligned on price and new module scope. Final contract to be sent by Feb 26.
1848
- duration-min: 45
1849
- - profileSlug: activity
1850
- title: Follow-up email — Arko Health
1851
- properties:
1852
- activity-type: Follow-up
1853
- activity-date: "2026-03-01"
1854
- activity-status: Planned
1855
- activity-outcome: Pending
1856
- related-company: ref:company:Arko Health
1857
- related-contact: ref:contact:Isabelle Moreau
1858
- related-deal: ref:deal:Arko Health — Starter Workspace
1859
- activity-owner: Sophie
1860
- summary: Send healthcare sector case study to re-engage.
1861
- duration-min: 0
1862
- - profileSlug: pipeline
1863
- title: New Business — Q1 2026
1864
- properties:
1865
- pipeline-status: Active
1866
- pipeline-type: New Business
1867
- total-value: 69600
1868
- deal-count: 3
1869
- avg-cycle-days: 45
1870
- win-rate: 38
1871
- pipeline-owner: Antoine
1872
- quarter-target: 120000
1873
- - profileSlug: pipeline
1874
- title: Renewals & Expansion — Q1 2026
1875
- properties:
1876
- pipeline-status: Active
1877
- pipeline-type: Renewal
1878
- total-value: 72000
1879
- deal-count: 1
1880
- avg-cycle-days: 21
1881
- win-rate: 85
1882
- pipeline-owner: Antoine
1883
- quarter-target: 80000
1884
- - profileSlug: company
1885
- title: Vanta Labs
1886
- properties:
1887
- company-status: Prospect
1888
- industry: Technology
1889
- company-size: 11-50
1890
- website: https://vantalabs.io
1891
- location: Berlin, Germany
1892
- health-score: 60
1893
- account-owner: Antoine
1894
- last-contact-date: "2026-02-05"
1895
- company-tags:
1896
- - prospect
1897
- - pilot
1898
- - germany
1899
- - profileSlug: contact
1900
- title: Thomas Geiger
1901
- properties:
1902
- contact-role: Decision Maker
1903
- contact-status: Active
1904
- job-title: Head of Product
1905
- company-name: ref:company:Vanta Labs
1906
- email: thomas@vantalabs.io
1907
- lead-score: 72
1908
- contact-source: Outbound
1909
- contact-owner: Antoine
1910
- last-interaction: "2026-02-05"
1911
- contact-tags:
1912
- - pilot
1913
- - product-led
1914
- suggestedRelations:
1915
- - sourceRef: contact:Camille Renard
1916
- targetRef: company:Lumio Technologies
1917
- type: belongs_to_project
1918
- - sourceRef: contact:Marcus Holt
1919
- targetRef: company:Meridian Finance
1920
- type: belongs_to_project
1921
- - sourceRef: contact:Isabelle Moreau
1922
- targetRef: company:Arko Health
1923
- type: belongs_to_project
1924
- - sourceRef: contact:Thomas Geiger
1925
- targetRef: company:Vanta Labs
1926
- type: belongs_to_project
1927
- - sourceRef: deal:Lumio — Data Pod Enterprise Licence
1928
- targetRef: company:Lumio Technologies
1929
- type: belongs_to_project
1930
- - sourceRef: deal:Meridian Finance — 2026 Renewal + Expansion
1931
- targetRef: company:Meridian Finance
1932
- type: belongs_to_project
1933
- - sourceRef: deal:Arko Health — Starter Workspace
1934
- targetRef: company:Arko Health
1935
- type: belongs_to_project
1936
- - sourceRef: deal:Vanta Labs — Pilot Evaluation
1937
- targetRef: company:Vanta Labs
1938
- type: belongs_to_project
1939
- - sourceRef: deal:Lumio — Data Pod Enterprise Licence
1940
- targetRef: contact:Camille Renard
1941
- type: relates_to
1942
- - sourceRef: deal:Meridian Finance — 2026 Renewal + Expansion
1943
- targetRef: contact:Marcus Holt
1944
- type: relates_to
1945
- - sourceRef: deal:Arko Health — Starter Workspace
1946
- targetRef: contact:Isabelle Moreau
1947
- type: relates_to
1948
- - sourceRef: deal:Vanta Labs — Pilot Evaluation
1949
- targetRef: contact:Thomas Geiger
1950
- type: relates_to
1951
- - sourceRef: activity:Product demo — Lumio CTO
1952
- targetRef: deal:Lumio — Data Pod Enterprise Licence
1953
- type: relates_to
1954
- - sourceRef: activity:Renewal negotiation call — Meridian
1955
- targetRef: deal:Meridian Finance — 2026 Renewal + Expansion
1956
- type: relates_to
1957
- - sourceRef: activity:Follow-up email — Arko Health
1958
- targetRef: deal:Arko Health — Starter Workspace
1959
- type: relates_to
1960
- - sourceRef: activity:Product demo — Lumio CTO
1961
- targetRef: contact:Camille Renard
1962
- type: attended_by
1963
- - sourceRef: activity:Renewal negotiation call — Meridian
1964
- targetRef: contact:Marcus Holt
1965
- type: attended_by
1966
- - sourceRef: activity:Follow-up email — Arko Health
1967
- targetRef: contact:Isabelle Moreau
1968
- type: attended_by
1969
- - sourceRef: deal:Lumio — Data Pod Enterprise Licence
1970
- targetRef: pipeline:New Business — Q1 2026
1971
- type: belongs_to_project
1972
- - sourceRef: deal:Arko Health — Starter Workspace
1973
- targetRef: pipeline:New Business — Q1 2026
1974
- type: belongs_to_project
1975
- - sourceRef: deal:Vanta Labs — Pilot Evaluation
1976
- targetRef: pipeline:New Business — Q1 2026
1977
- type: belongs_to_project
1978
- - sourceRef: deal:Meridian Finance — 2026 Renewal + Expansion
1979
- targetRef: pipeline:Renewals & Expansion — Q1 2026
1980
- type: belongs_to_project
1616
+ - sourceProfileSlug: client
1617
+ targetProfileSlug: company
1618
+ type: belongs_to
1619
+ - sourceProfileSlug: client
1620
+ targetProfileSlug: contact
1621
+ type: primary_contact
1622
+ - sourceProfileSlug: partner
1623
+ targetProfileSlug: company
1624
+ type: works_with
1625
+ - sourceProfileSlug: partner
1626
+ targetProfileSlug: contact
1627
+ type: primary_contact
1628
+ - sourceProfileSlug: partner
1629
+ targetProfileSlug: client
1630
+ type: refers
1981
1631
  displayTemplates:
1982
1632
  - name: Deal Card
1983
1633
  description: Sales deal with pipeline stage, value, probability, and linked company
@@ -2568,6 +2218,45 @@ integrations:
2568
2218
  onboarding:
2569
2219
  goal: Capture the user's sales pipeline shape, their key accounts/contacts, and how they qualify and move deals — so the CRM reflects their real revenue motion, not a generic template.
2570
2220
  framing: "Act as a sharp revenue/sales-ops lead. Tease out how they actually sell: who they sell to, what stages a deal moves through, where leads come from, and what 'qualified' means to them. Translate their words into pipeline config, companies, contacts, and deals."
2221
+ expertise:
2222
+ starters:
2223
+ - >
2224
+ Don't ask for stages on a blank slate — infer the motion first and propose
2225
+ a default pipeline for it. PLG: Signup → Activated → PQL → Expansion.
2226
+ Sales-led: Discovery → Qualified → Demo → Proposal → Negotiation → Closed.
2227
+ Agency/retainer: Lead → Scoping → Proposal → Won → Delivery. Offer the one
2228
+ that fits and let them cut stages, rather than starting from nothing.
2229
+ - >
2230
+ Define every stage by a BUYER action, not a seller activity — "Demo booked"
2231
+ or "Security review passed", not "Following up" or "Sent email". Seller-verb
2232
+ stages are why pipelines rot: they describe effort, not progress. If they
2233
+ name an activity stage, reflect it back as the buyer commitment it's meant
2234
+ to prove.
2235
+ - >
2236
+ Anchor qualification to a named framework, don't leave "qualified" as a
2237
+ feeling. Propose BANT for transactional deals or MEDDIC for enterprise, then
2238
+ make the exit criteria out of it — e.g. a deal can't leave Qualified without
2239
+ a known budget, an identified economic buyer, and a compelling event.
2240
+ blindSpots:
2241
+ - >
2242
+ The "everything is 'in progress'" pipeline. If most deals sit in middle
2243
+ stages with no close date or next step, that's not a pipeline, it's a
2244
+ graveyard — hygiene has collapsed. Push for a next step + a date on every
2245
+ open deal, and be willing to mark the dead ones lost.
2246
+ - >
2247
+ A stage with no exit criteria is a wish, not a stage. If they can't tell you
2248
+ the ONE thing that must be true to advance a deal, the stage is theater.
2249
+ Force a crisp gate for each — what the buyer must have done to move forward.
2250
+ - >
2251
+ Founders track deal value but not the two numbers that actually predict
2252
+ revenue: win rate by stage and average sales-cycle length. Without them you
2253
+ can't forecast or spot where deals stall. Surface both early even if the
2254
+ first answer is a rough guess.
2255
+ bar: >
2256
+ The pipeline stages mirror how a buyer actually commits (not how the rep works
2257
+ their day), each stage has a one-line exit gate, "qualified" maps to a real
2258
+ framework, and every live deal on the board has an owner, a value, a next step,
2259
+ and a close date — so a glance at the board tells the truth about revenue.
2571
2260
  collect:
2572
2261
  - profileSlug: pipeline
2573
2262
  what: Their real deal stages in order (e.g. Lead → Qualified → Demo → Proposal → Won/Lost)