@synap-core/workspace-templates 0.2.2 → 0.4.0
This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
- package/dist/templates.d.ts.map +1 -1
- package/dist/templates.js +5284 -4420
- package/dist/types.d.ts +22 -0
- package/dist/types.d.ts.map +1 -1
- package/package.json +25 -15
- package/src/agent-fleet.yaml +38 -398
- package/src/brand-library.yaml +68 -44
- package/src/builder.yaml +75 -18
- package/src/content-os.yaml +31 -391
- package/src/content-studio.yaml +70 -22
- package/src/crm.yaml +112 -423
- package/src/dev-dashboard.yaml +37 -393
- package/src/finance.yaml +485 -0
- package/src/foundation.yaml +34 -8
- package/src/hr.yaml +474 -0
- package/src/legal.yaml +495 -0
- package/src/life-os.yaml +42 -89
- package/src/marketing.yaml +67 -15
- package/src/operations.yaml +496 -0
- package/src/personal.yaml +68 -6
- package/src/project-management.yaml +38 -378
- package/src/radar.yaml +34 -11
- package/src/templates.ts +5284 -4420
- package/src/types.ts +27 -0
package/src/content-studio.yaml
CHANGED
|
@@ -288,25 +288,73 @@ entityLinks:
|
|
|
288
288
|
type: used_in
|
|
289
289
|
label: Composition
|
|
290
290
|
|
|
291
|
-
|
|
292
|
-
|
|
293
|
-
|
|
294
|
-
|
|
295
|
-
|
|
296
|
-
|
|
297
|
-
|
|
298
|
-
|
|
299
|
-
|
|
300
|
-
|
|
301
|
-
|
|
302
|
-
|
|
303
|
-
|
|
304
|
-
|
|
305
|
-
|
|
306
|
-
|
|
307
|
-
|
|
308
|
-
|
|
309
|
-
|
|
310
|
-
|
|
311
|
-
|
|
312
|
-
|
|
291
|
+
onboarding:
|
|
292
|
+
goal: Capture how you actually produce video and motion content — your real pipelines, your reusable templates, and the assets you cut from — so the studio mirrors your production line, not a generic setup.
|
|
293
|
+
framing: >
|
|
294
|
+
THE PRODUCER: Act as a seasoned motion/video production lead who has shipped
|
|
295
|
+
thousands of frames. This is a HyperFrames/Remotion render pipeline, NOT a
|
|
296
|
+
publishing calendar — anchor on how work gets MADE: formats, aspect ratios,
|
|
297
|
+
durations, and the templates that make output repeatable. Push for the shows
|
|
298
|
+
and series they actually run, not one-off ideas. Pull voice and visual identity
|
|
299
|
+
from Brand and target audience from Foundation so every piece lands on-brand.
|
|
300
|
+
Be concrete about specs; a fuzzy "we make videos" helps no one.
|
|
301
|
+
expertise:
|
|
302
|
+
starters:
|
|
303
|
+
- >
|
|
304
|
+
Produce in BATCHES, not one-at-a-time. Setup — lighting, wardrobe, template
|
|
305
|
+
loading, brand assets — is the real cost; shooting or composing five pieces
|
|
306
|
+
in one session amortizes it. Propose a batch cadence (e.g. one shoot day →
|
|
307
|
+
a month of cuts) rather than a per-video pipeline.
|
|
308
|
+
- >
|
|
309
|
+
The hook is 80% of the view. On a 9:16 feed the first 1–2 seconds decide
|
|
310
|
+
whether the piece is watched at all, so it's worth more iteration than the
|
|
311
|
+
rest combined. Propose a template whose title card / cold-open IS the hook,
|
|
312
|
+
and treat the hook as its own reusable asset.
|
|
313
|
+
- >
|
|
314
|
+
Design every shoot for REPURPOSING before you roll. One long-form capture
|
|
315
|
+
should yield the long cut, several vertical clips, and stills — but only if
|
|
316
|
+
it's framed and shot with those crops in mind. Propose the repurpose chain
|
|
317
|
+
up front so the raw footage is cut-once, use-many.
|
|
318
|
+
blindSpots:
|
|
319
|
+
- >
|
|
320
|
+
The velocity-vs-quality tradeoff is a real dial, not a failing — a weekly
|
|
321
|
+
show that's "good enough and on time" beats a cinematic piece that ships
|
|
322
|
+
quarterly. If they're chasing polish on a high-cadence line, name the
|
|
323
|
+
tradeoff and propose a quality bar that survives the schedule.
|
|
324
|
+
- >
|
|
325
|
+
No reusable templates = every video rebuilt from scratch, and brand drift
|
|
326
|
+
creeps in. If they're producing on a cadence but have no locked
|
|
327
|
+
intros/outros/lower-thirds, that's the gap — templates are what make output
|
|
328
|
+
both fast AND on-brand. Surface it.
|
|
329
|
+
- >
|
|
330
|
+
Aspect ratio and platform are a production decision, not an export
|
|
331
|
+
afterthought. Shooting 16:9 and cropping to 9:16 later loses the frame and
|
|
332
|
+
the hook. If a pipeline's platform doesn't match how it's actually shot,
|
|
333
|
+
flag the mismatch before it's baked into every render.
|
|
334
|
+
bar: >
|
|
335
|
+
The studio reads like a production LINE: recurring shows with locked specs,
|
|
336
|
+
reusable templates that carry brand into every render, and asset sources feeding
|
|
337
|
+
a batch-then-repurpose flow — so a producer could ship the next episode this week
|
|
338
|
+
without reinventing the format or fighting brand drift.
|
|
339
|
+
collect:
|
|
340
|
+
- profileSlug: content-pipeline
|
|
341
|
+
what: The recurring productions you run — the shows, series, or content lines that generate output on a cadence (e.g. weekly reels, product demos, explainer drops).
|
|
342
|
+
cardinality: few
|
|
343
|
+
keyFields: [pipeline-kind, pipeline-platform, pipeline-mode]
|
|
344
|
+
- profileSlug: content-template
|
|
345
|
+
what: The reusable HyperFrames/Remotion templates that make production repeatable — your title cards, lower-thirds, intros/outros, and full-video shells. These carry Brand voice and visual identity into every render.
|
|
346
|
+
cardinality: several
|
|
347
|
+
keyFields: [template-kind, aspect-ratio, template-status]
|
|
348
|
+
- profileSlug: content-asset
|
|
349
|
+
what: The asset sources you cut from — brand footage, stock, audio/music beds, and fonts. Note whether each comes from Brand, is uploaded, or is generated.
|
|
350
|
+
cardinality: several
|
|
351
|
+
keyFields: [asset-kind, source-kind, source-url]
|
|
352
|
+
- profileSlug: content-composition
|
|
353
|
+
what: Any compositions already in flight — specific videos being built, with their aspect ratio and duration, tied back to a pipeline.
|
|
354
|
+
cardinality: few
|
|
355
|
+
keyFields: [aspect-ratio, duration-seconds, pipeline-ref]
|
|
356
|
+
openingQuestions:
|
|
357
|
+
- "What do you actually produce on repeat — the shows or series, and for which platforms and aspect ratios?"
|
|
358
|
+
- "Which motion templates do you reuse every time — intros, lower-thirds, outros — and are they HyperFrames, Remotion, or hybrid?"
|
|
359
|
+
- "Where do your assets come from — Brand footage and fonts, uploaded clips, or AI-generated — and where do you pull music from?"
|
|
360
|
+
doneWhen: at least one pipeline + one reusable template + one asset source captured.
|
package/src/crm.yaml
CHANGED
|
@@ -620,6 +620,64 @@ profiles:
|
|
|
620
620
|
- healthy
|
|
621
621
|
- at_risk
|
|
622
622
|
- critical
|
|
623
|
+
- slug: partner
|
|
624
|
+
displayName: Partner
|
|
625
|
+
icon: handshake
|
|
626
|
+
color: teal
|
|
627
|
+
description: A partner relationship — both a referral source and a co-delivery collaborator, distinguished by partner type.
|
|
628
|
+
properties:
|
|
629
|
+
- slug: partnerStatus
|
|
630
|
+
label: Status
|
|
631
|
+
valueType: string
|
|
632
|
+
inputType: select
|
|
633
|
+
enumValues:
|
|
634
|
+
- active
|
|
635
|
+
- paused
|
|
636
|
+
- churned
|
|
637
|
+
- slug: partnerType
|
|
638
|
+
label: Partner Type
|
|
639
|
+
valueType: string
|
|
640
|
+
inputType: select
|
|
641
|
+
enumValues:
|
|
642
|
+
- referral
|
|
643
|
+
- co-delivery
|
|
644
|
+
- both
|
|
645
|
+
- slug: accountManager
|
|
646
|
+
label: Account Manager
|
|
647
|
+
valueType: string
|
|
648
|
+
inputType: text
|
|
649
|
+
- slug: engagementStartDate
|
|
650
|
+
label: Engagement Start
|
|
651
|
+
valueType: date
|
|
652
|
+
inputType: date
|
|
653
|
+
- slug: satisfactionScore
|
|
654
|
+
label: Satisfaction
|
|
655
|
+
valueType: number
|
|
656
|
+
inputType: number
|
|
657
|
+
- slug: lifetimeValue
|
|
658
|
+
label: Lifetime Value
|
|
659
|
+
valueType: number
|
|
660
|
+
inputType: number
|
|
661
|
+
- slug: notes
|
|
662
|
+
label: Notes
|
|
663
|
+
valueType: string
|
|
664
|
+
inputType: textarea
|
|
665
|
+
- slug: contractValue
|
|
666
|
+
label: Contract Value
|
|
667
|
+
valueType: number
|
|
668
|
+
inputType: number
|
|
669
|
+
- slug: renewalDate
|
|
670
|
+
label: Renewal Date
|
|
671
|
+
valueType: date
|
|
672
|
+
inputType: date
|
|
673
|
+
- slug: healthScore
|
|
674
|
+
label: Health
|
|
675
|
+
valueType: string
|
|
676
|
+
inputType: select
|
|
677
|
+
enumValues:
|
|
678
|
+
- healthy
|
|
679
|
+
- at_risk
|
|
680
|
+
- critical
|
|
623
681
|
- slug: contact
|
|
624
682
|
displayName: Contact
|
|
625
683
|
icon: user
|
|
@@ -1555,429 +1613,21 @@ entityLinks:
|
|
|
1555
1613
|
- sourceProfileSlug: deal
|
|
1556
1614
|
targetProfileSlug: pipeline
|
|
1557
1615
|
type: belongs_to
|
|
1558
|
-
|
|
1559
|
-
|
|
1560
|
-
|
|
1561
|
-
|
|
1562
|
-
|
|
1563
|
-
|
|
1564
|
-
|
|
1565
|
-
|
|
1566
|
-
|
|
1567
|
-
|
|
1568
|
-
|
|
1569
|
-
|
|
1570
|
-
|
|
1571
|
-
|
|
1572
|
-
|
|
1573
|
-
- b2b
|
|
1574
|
-
- priority
|
|
1575
|
-
notes: Interested in the data sovereignty angle. CTO is hands-on.
|
|
1576
|
-
- profileSlug: company
|
|
1577
|
-
title: Meridian Finance
|
|
1578
|
-
properties:
|
|
1579
|
-
company-status: Customer
|
|
1580
|
-
industry: Fintech
|
|
1581
|
-
company-size: 201-500
|
|
1582
|
-
arr: 48000
|
|
1583
|
-
website: https://meridianfinance.eu
|
|
1584
|
-
location: Brussels, Belgium
|
|
1585
|
-
health-score: 88
|
|
1586
|
-
account-owner: Antoine
|
|
1587
|
-
last-contact-date: "2026-02-18"
|
|
1588
|
-
company-tags:
|
|
1589
|
-
- fintech
|
|
1590
|
-
- gdpr-sensitive
|
|
1591
|
-
- expansion
|
|
1592
|
-
notes: Renewing Q1. Explore expansion into compliance module.
|
|
1593
|
-
content: |-
|
|
1594
|
-
# Account Brief: Meridian Finance
|
|
1595
|
-
|
|
1596
|
-
## Overview
|
|
1597
|
-
|
|
1598
|
-
Meridian Finance is a mid-market financial advisory firm (201-500 employees) using Synap since Q3 2024. Currently on the Business plan (€1,400/month, 25 seats). This renewal cycle also includes an expansion conversation — compliance team wants to onboard (additional 15 seats).
|
|
1599
|
-
|
|
1600
|
-
## Relationship health
|
|
1601
|
-
|
|
1602
|
-
- **Health score**: 82/100
|
|
1603
|
-
- **Primary contact**: Marcus Holt (VP Operations) — strong champion, uses Synap daily for deal tracking and team coordination
|
|
1604
|
-
- **Usage**: High. 22 of 25 seats active. Core use cases: deal pipeline, client note-taking, compliance log
|
|
1605
|
-
|
|
1606
|
-
## Renewal context
|
|
1607
|
-
|
|
1608
|
-
Contract expires March 31, 2026. Marcus initiated the renewal conversation proactively in January — positive signal. The expansion request (compliance team) was his idea, not a upsell push from our side.
|
|
1609
|
-
|
|
1610
|
-
**Current**: €1,400/month × 12 = €16,800/year
|
|
1611
|
-
**Proposed renewal + expansion**: €1,950/month × 12 = €23,400/year (+39%)
|
|
1612
|
-
|
|
1613
|
-
## Risk factors
|
|
1614
|
-
|
|
1615
|
-
- CFO is new (joined January 2026) — unknown stance on SaaS spend
|
|
1616
|
-
- Competing internal proposal to consolidate on Microsoft 365 (SharePoint + Viva)
|
|
1617
|
-
- Marcus has confirmed he's advocating for Synap but may need us to provide ROI data
|
|
1618
|
-
|
|
1619
|
-
## Strategy
|
|
1620
|
-
|
|
1621
|
-
Lead with usage data and ROI framing. Get Marcus a one-pager he can share with the new CFO. The Microsoft consolidation risk is real — need to position Synap as complementary to M365, not competing with it.
|
|
1622
|
-
- profileSlug: company
|
|
1623
|
-
title: Arko Health
|
|
1624
|
-
properties:
|
|
1625
|
-
company-status: Active
|
|
1626
|
-
industry: Healthcare
|
|
1627
|
-
company-size: 11-50
|
|
1628
|
-
arr: 18000
|
|
1629
|
-
website: https://arkohealth.com
|
|
1630
|
-
location: Lyon, France
|
|
1631
|
-
health-score: 55
|
|
1632
|
-
account-owner: Sophie
|
|
1633
|
-
last-contact-date: "2026-01-28"
|
|
1634
|
-
company-tags:
|
|
1635
|
-
- healthcare
|
|
1636
|
-
- at-risk
|
|
1637
|
-
notes: Usage dropped last month. Schedule QBR.
|
|
1638
|
-
- profileSlug: contact
|
|
1639
|
-
title: Camille Renard
|
|
1640
|
-
properties:
|
|
1641
|
-
contact-role: Champion
|
|
1642
|
-
contact-status: Active
|
|
1643
|
-
job-title: CTO
|
|
1644
|
-
company-name: ref:company:Lumio Technologies
|
|
1645
|
-
email: c.renard@lumio.io
|
|
1646
|
-
phone: +33 6 12 34 56 78
|
|
1647
|
-
linkedin: https://linkedin.com/in/camillerenard
|
|
1648
|
-
lead-score: 84
|
|
1649
|
-
contact-source: LinkedIn
|
|
1650
|
-
contact-owner: Antoine
|
|
1651
|
-
last-interaction: "2026-02-10"
|
|
1652
|
-
contact-tags:
|
|
1653
|
-
- technical
|
|
1654
|
-
- champion
|
|
1655
|
-
- decision-maker
|
|
1656
|
-
- profileSlug: contact
|
|
1657
|
-
title: Marcus Holt
|
|
1658
|
-
properties:
|
|
1659
|
-
contact-role: Decision Maker
|
|
1660
|
-
contact-status: Active
|
|
1661
|
-
job-title: VP of Operations
|
|
1662
|
-
company-name: ref:company:Meridian Finance
|
|
1663
|
-
email: m.holt@meridianfinance.eu
|
|
1664
|
-
phone: +32 2 555 0198
|
|
1665
|
-
linkedin: https://linkedin.com/in/marcusholt
|
|
1666
|
-
lead-score: 91
|
|
1667
|
-
contact-source: Referral
|
|
1668
|
-
contact-owner: Antoine
|
|
1669
|
-
last-interaction: "2026-02-18"
|
|
1670
|
-
contact-tags:
|
|
1671
|
-
- renewal
|
|
1672
|
-
- expansion-potential
|
|
1673
|
-
- profileSlug: contact
|
|
1674
|
-
title: Isabelle Moreau
|
|
1675
|
-
properties:
|
|
1676
|
-
contact-role: Lead
|
|
1677
|
-
contact-status: Nurturing
|
|
1678
|
-
job-title: Head of Digital
|
|
1679
|
-
company-name: ref:company:Arko Health
|
|
1680
|
-
email: i.moreau@arkohealth.com
|
|
1681
|
-
lead-score: 47
|
|
1682
|
-
contact-source: Event
|
|
1683
|
-
contact-owner: Sophie
|
|
1684
|
-
last-interaction: "2026-01-28"
|
|
1685
|
-
contact-tags:
|
|
1686
|
-
- healthcare
|
|
1687
|
-
- nurture
|
|
1688
|
-
- profileSlug: deal
|
|
1689
|
-
title: Lumio — Data Pod Enterprise Licence
|
|
1690
|
-
properties:
|
|
1691
|
-
stage: Proposal
|
|
1692
|
-
deal-value: 36000
|
|
1693
|
-
probability: 60
|
|
1694
|
-
close-date: "2026-03-31"
|
|
1695
|
-
deal-type: New Business
|
|
1696
|
-
deal-company: ref:company:Lumio Technologies
|
|
1697
|
-
deal-contact: ref:contact:Camille Renard
|
|
1698
|
-
deal-owner: Antoine
|
|
1699
|
-
next-action: Send revised proposal with compliance annex
|
|
1700
|
-
next-action-date: "2026-02-25"
|
|
1701
|
-
deal-source: Outbound
|
|
1702
|
-
deal-tags:
|
|
1703
|
-
- q1
|
|
1704
|
-
- priority
|
|
1705
|
-
- enterprise
|
|
1706
|
-
content: |-
|
|
1707
|
-
# Deal Brief: Lumio Technologies — Data Pod Enterprise Licence
|
|
1708
|
-
|
|
1709
|
-
## Opportunity summary
|
|
1710
|
-
|
|
1711
|
-
Lumio Technologies is evaluating Synap as the data infrastructure layer for their internal knowledge management and client-facing data operations. Decision maker is Camille Renard (Head of Engineering), with budget authority sitting with the CTO (François Leroy, not yet in contact).
|
|
1712
|
-
|
|
1713
|
-
- **Stage**: Proposal
|
|
1714
|
-
- **Value**: €28,000 / year
|
|
1715
|
-
- **Close target**: March 31, 2026
|
|
1716
|
-
- **Win probability**: 65%
|
|
1717
|
-
|
|
1718
|
-
## Why they're looking
|
|
1719
|
-
|
|
1720
|
-
Lumio's current stack is fragmented: Notion for internal docs, HubSpot for client data, Airtable for project tracking. No single system of record. The data sovereignty angle resonates strongly — they've had two incidents in the last year where vendor downtime blocked client deliverables.
|
|
1721
|
-
|
|
1722
|
-
## Competitive situation
|
|
1723
|
-
|
|
1724
|
-
Evaluating three options: Synap, a custom-built internal tool, and extending their current Notion setup. The custom-build option is losing traction (engineering bandwidth is constrained). Synap vs. extended Notion is the real comparison.
|
|
1725
|
-
|
|
1726
|
-
## Win conditions
|
|
1727
|
-
|
|
1728
|
-
1. Demo showing cross-entity relationships — specifically, linking client records to project entities to activity logs
|
|
1729
|
-
2. Self-hosting option confirmed for their EU data residency requirement
|
|
1730
|
-
3. Pricing flexibility on seat count (currently 12 users, may scale to 30+)
|
|
1731
|
-
|
|
1732
|
-
## Next actions
|
|
1733
|
-
|
|
1734
|
-
- [ ] Send proposal deck with custom pricing table (by Feb 28)
|
|
1735
|
-
- [ ] Schedule technical session with François Leroy
|
|
1736
|
-
- [ ] Confirm self-hosting deployment timeline with engineering team
|
|
1737
|
-
- profileSlug: deal
|
|
1738
|
-
title: Meridian Finance — 2026 Renewal + Expansion
|
|
1739
|
-
properties:
|
|
1740
|
-
stage: Negotiation
|
|
1741
|
-
deal-value: 72000
|
|
1742
|
-
probability: 85
|
|
1743
|
-
close-date: "2026-03-15"
|
|
1744
|
-
deal-type: Renewal
|
|
1745
|
-
deal-company: ref:company:Meridian Finance
|
|
1746
|
-
deal-contact: ref:contact:Marcus Holt
|
|
1747
|
-
deal-owner: Antoine
|
|
1748
|
-
next-action: Final contract review call
|
|
1749
|
-
next-action-date: "2026-02-26"
|
|
1750
|
-
deal-source: Inbound
|
|
1751
|
-
deal-tags:
|
|
1752
|
-
- renewal
|
|
1753
|
-
- expansion
|
|
1754
|
-
- q1-close
|
|
1755
|
-
- profileSlug: deal
|
|
1756
|
-
title: Arko Health — Starter Workspace
|
|
1757
|
-
properties:
|
|
1758
|
-
stage: Qualified
|
|
1759
|
-
deal-value: 9600
|
|
1760
|
-
probability: 35
|
|
1761
|
-
close-date: "2026-04-30"
|
|
1762
|
-
deal-type: New Business
|
|
1763
|
-
deal-company: ref:company:Arko Health
|
|
1764
|
-
deal-contact: ref:contact:Isabelle Moreau
|
|
1765
|
-
deal-owner: Sophie
|
|
1766
|
-
next-action: Send case study from healthcare client
|
|
1767
|
-
next-action-date: "2026-03-01"
|
|
1768
|
-
deal-source: Event
|
|
1769
|
-
deal-tags:
|
|
1770
|
-
- healthcare
|
|
1771
|
-
- at-risk
|
|
1772
|
-
- q2
|
|
1773
|
-
- profileSlug: deal
|
|
1774
|
-
title: Vanta Labs — Pilot Evaluation
|
|
1775
|
-
properties:
|
|
1776
|
-
stage: Prospecting
|
|
1777
|
-
deal-value: 24000
|
|
1778
|
-
probability: 20
|
|
1779
|
-
close-date: "2026-05-15"
|
|
1780
|
-
deal-type: New Business
|
|
1781
|
-
deal-company: ref:company:Vanta Labs
|
|
1782
|
-
deal-contact: ref:contact:Thomas Geiger
|
|
1783
|
-
deal-owner: Antoine
|
|
1784
|
-
next-action: Discovery call scheduled
|
|
1785
|
-
next-action-date: "2026-02-28"
|
|
1786
|
-
deal-source: Outbound
|
|
1787
|
-
deal-tags:
|
|
1788
|
-
- pilot
|
|
1789
|
-
- early-stage
|
|
1790
|
-
- profileSlug: activity
|
|
1791
|
-
title: Product demo — Lumio CTO
|
|
1792
|
-
properties:
|
|
1793
|
-
activity-type: Demo
|
|
1794
|
-
activity-date: "2026-02-10"
|
|
1795
|
-
activity-status: Completed
|
|
1796
|
-
activity-outcome: Positive
|
|
1797
|
-
related-company: ref:company:Lumio Technologies
|
|
1798
|
-
related-contact: ref:contact:Camille Renard
|
|
1799
|
-
related-deal: ref:deal:Lumio — Data Pod Enterprise Licence
|
|
1800
|
-
activity-owner: Antoine
|
|
1801
|
-
summary: Ran full platform demo. Strong reaction to the relationship graph and pod sovereignty model. Asked for compliance documentation.
|
|
1802
|
-
duration-min: 60
|
|
1803
|
-
content: |-
|
|
1804
|
-
# Product Demo — Lumio Technologies
|
|
1805
|
-
|
|
1806
|
-
**Date**: February 10, 2026
|
|
1807
|
-
**Attendees**: Camille Renard (Head of Engineering, Lumio), Antoine (Synap)
|
|
1808
|
-
**Type**: Demo
|
|
1809
|
-
**Outcome**: Positive
|
|
1810
|
-
|
|
1811
|
-
## What we covered
|
|
1812
|
-
|
|
1813
|
-
Ran a 45-minute walkthrough of Synap's entity model, focusing on cross-profile relationships. Specifically demoed:
|
|
1814
|
-
|
|
1815
|
-
1. A Company entity with linked Contacts, Deals, and Activity log — all from one view
|
|
1816
|
-
2. The graph view showing the relationship map across entity types
|
|
1817
|
-
3. Bento dashboard with live entity counts and feed
|
|
1818
|
-
|
|
1819
|
-
Camille's reaction to the graph view: "This is what we've been trying to build manually in Notion for two years."
|
|
1820
|
-
|
|
1821
|
-
## Key objections raised
|
|
1822
|
-
|
|
1823
|
-
- **Self-hosting**: They need EU data residency. Confirmed Synap supports self-hosted deployment. Need to send technical docs.
|
|
1824
|
-
- **Migration**: Existing Notion data (~3,000 pages). Asked about import tooling — told them CSV import is live, full Notion export support in Q2 roadmap.
|
|
1825
|
-
- **Seat pricing**: Currently 12 users but expects to grow. Agreed to discuss volume pricing in proposal.
|
|
1826
|
-
|
|
1827
|
-
## Commitments made
|
|
1828
|
-
|
|
1829
|
-
- Antoine: Send proposal by Feb 28 with custom pricing for 12-30 seat range
|
|
1830
|
-
- Antoine: Intro Camille to engineering team for self-hosting technical session
|
|
1831
|
-
- Camille: Get François Leroy (CTO) into next call
|
|
1832
|
-
|
|
1833
|
-
## Assessment
|
|
1834
|
-
|
|
1835
|
-
High intent. The data sovereignty framing landed. Biggest risk is the CTO not prioritizing before Q1 close — need to get him into the room before March 15.
|
|
1836
|
-
- profileSlug: activity
|
|
1837
|
-
title: Renewal negotiation call — Meridian
|
|
1838
|
-
properties:
|
|
1839
|
-
activity-type: Call
|
|
1840
|
-
activity-date: "2026-02-18"
|
|
1841
|
-
activity-status: Completed
|
|
1842
|
-
activity-outcome: Positive
|
|
1843
|
-
related-company: ref:company:Meridian Finance
|
|
1844
|
-
related-contact: ref:contact:Marcus Holt
|
|
1845
|
-
related-deal: ref:deal:Meridian Finance — 2026 Renewal + Expansion
|
|
1846
|
-
activity-owner: Antoine
|
|
1847
|
-
summary: Aligned on price and new module scope. Final contract to be sent by Feb 26.
|
|
1848
|
-
duration-min: 45
|
|
1849
|
-
- profileSlug: activity
|
|
1850
|
-
title: Follow-up email — Arko Health
|
|
1851
|
-
properties:
|
|
1852
|
-
activity-type: Follow-up
|
|
1853
|
-
activity-date: "2026-03-01"
|
|
1854
|
-
activity-status: Planned
|
|
1855
|
-
activity-outcome: Pending
|
|
1856
|
-
related-company: ref:company:Arko Health
|
|
1857
|
-
related-contact: ref:contact:Isabelle Moreau
|
|
1858
|
-
related-deal: ref:deal:Arko Health — Starter Workspace
|
|
1859
|
-
activity-owner: Sophie
|
|
1860
|
-
summary: Send healthcare sector case study to re-engage.
|
|
1861
|
-
duration-min: 0
|
|
1862
|
-
- profileSlug: pipeline
|
|
1863
|
-
title: New Business — Q1 2026
|
|
1864
|
-
properties:
|
|
1865
|
-
pipeline-status: Active
|
|
1866
|
-
pipeline-type: New Business
|
|
1867
|
-
total-value: 69600
|
|
1868
|
-
deal-count: 3
|
|
1869
|
-
avg-cycle-days: 45
|
|
1870
|
-
win-rate: 38
|
|
1871
|
-
pipeline-owner: Antoine
|
|
1872
|
-
quarter-target: 120000
|
|
1873
|
-
- profileSlug: pipeline
|
|
1874
|
-
title: Renewals & Expansion — Q1 2026
|
|
1875
|
-
properties:
|
|
1876
|
-
pipeline-status: Active
|
|
1877
|
-
pipeline-type: Renewal
|
|
1878
|
-
total-value: 72000
|
|
1879
|
-
deal-count: 1
|
|
1880
|
-
avg-cycle-days: 21
|
|
1881
|
-
win-rate: 85
|
|
1882
|
-
pipeline-owner: Antoine
|
|
1883
|
-
quarter-target: 80000
|
|
1884
|
-
- profileSlug: company
|
|
1885
|
-
title: Vanta Labs
|
|
1886
|
-
properties:
|
|
1887
|
-
company-status: Prospect
|
|
1888
|
-
industry: Technology
|
|
1889
|
-
company-size: 11-50
|
|
1890
|
-
website: https://vantalabs.io
|
|
1891
|
-
location: Berlin, Germany
|
|
1892
|
-
health-score: 60
|
|
1893
|
-
account-owner: Antoine
|
|
1894
|
-
last-contact-date: "2026-02-05"
|
|
1895
|
-
company-tags:
|
|
1896
|
-
- prospect
|
|
1897
|
-
- pilot
|
|
1898
|
-
- germany
|
|
1899
|
-
- profileSlug: contact
|
|
1900
|
-
title: Thomas Geiger
|
|
1901
|
-
properties:
|
|
1902
|
-
contact-role: Decision Maker
|
|
1903
|
-
contact-status: Active
|
|
1904
|
-
job-title: Head of Product
|
|
1905
|
-
company-name: ref:company:Vanta Labs
|
|
1906
|
-
email: thomas@vantalabs.io
|
|
1907
|
-
lead-score: 72
|
|
1908
|
-
contact-source: Outbound
|
|
1909
|
-
contact-owner: Antoine
|
|
1910
|
-
last-interaction: "2026-02-05"
|
|
1911
|
-
contact-tags:
|
|
1912
|
-
- pilot
|
|
1913
|
-
- product-led
|
|
1914
|
-
suggestedRelations:
|
|
1915
|
-
- sourceRef: contact:Camille Renard
|
|
1916
|
-
targetRef: company:Lumio Technologies
|
|
1917
|
-
type: belongs_to_project
|
|
1918
|
-
- sourceRef: contact:Marcus Holt
|
|
1919
|
-
targetRef: company:Meridian Finance
|
|
1920
|
-
type: belongs_to_project
|
|
1921
|
-
- sourceRef: contact:Isabelle Moreau
|
|
1922
|
-
targetRef: company:Arko Health
|
|
1923
|
-
type: belongs_to_project
|
|
1924
|
-
- sourceRef: contact:Thomas Geiger
|
|
1925
|
-
targetRef: company:Vanta Labs
|
|
1926
|
-
type: belongs_to_project
|
|
1927
|
-
- sourceRef: deal:Lumio — Data Pod Enterprise Licence
|
|
1928
|
-
targetRef: company:Lumio Technologies
|
|
1929
|
-
type: belongs_to_project
|
|
1930
|
-
- sourceRef: deal:Meridian Finance — 2026 Renewal + Expansion
|
|
1931
|
-
targetRef: company:Meridian Finance
|
|
1932
|
-
type: belongs_to_project
|
|
1933
|
-
- sourceRef: deal:Arko Health — Starter Workspace
|
|
1934
|
-
targetRef: company:Arko Health
|
|
1935
|
-
type: belongs_to_project
|
|
1936
|
-
- sourceRef: deal:Vanta Labs — Pilot Evaluation
|
|
1937
|
-
targetRef: company:Vanta Labs
|
|
1938
|
-
type: belongs_to_project
|
|
1939
|
-
- sourceRef: deal:Lumio — Data Pod Enterprise Licence
|
|
1940
|
-
targetRef: contact:Camille Renard
|
|
1941
|
-
type: relates_to
|
|
1942
|
-
- sourceRef: deal:Meridian Finance — 2026 Renewal + Expansion
|
|
1943
|
-
targetRef: contact:Marcus Holt
|
|
1944
|
-
type: relates_to
|
|
1945
|
-
- sourceRef: deal:Arko Health — Starter Workspace
|
|
1946
|
-
targetRef: contact:Isabelle Moreau
|
|
1947
|
-
type: relates_to
|
|
1948
|
-
- sourceRef: deal:Vanta Labs — Pilot Evaluation
|
|
1949
|
-
targetRef: contact:Thomas Geiger
|
|
1950
|
-
type: relates_to
|
|
1951
|
-
- sourceRef: activity:Product demo — Lumio CTO
|
|
1952
|
-
targetRef: deal:Lumio — Data Pod Enterprise Licence
|
|
1953
|
-
type: relates_to
|
|
1954
|
-
- sourceRef: activity:Renewal negotiation call — Meridian
|
|
1955
|
-
targetRef: deal:Meridian Finance — 2026 Renewal + Expansion
|
|
1956
|
-
type: relates_to
|
|
1957
|
-
- sourceRef: activity:Follow-up email — Arko Health
|
|
1958
|
-
targetRef: deal:Arko Health — Starter Workspace
|
|
1959
|
-
type: relates_to
|
|
1960
|
-
- sourceRef: activity:Product demo — Lumio CTO
|
|
1961
|
-
targetRef: contact:Camille Renard
|
|
1962
|
-
type: attended_by
|
|
1963
|
-
- sourceRef: activity:Renewal negotiation call — Meridian
|
|
1964
|
-
targetRef: contact:Marcus Holt
|
|
1965
|
-
type: attended_by
|
|
1966
|
-
- sourceRef: activity:Follow-up email — Arko Health
|
|
1967
|
-
targetRef: contact:Isabelle Moreau
|
|
1968
|
-
type: attended_by
|
|
1969
|
-
- sourceRef: deal:Lumio — Data Pod Enterprise Licence
|
|
1970
|
-
targetRef: pipeline:New Business — Q1 2026
|
|
1971
|
-
type: belongs_to_project
|
|
1972
|
-
- sourceRef: deal:Arko Health — Starter Workspace
|
|
1973
|
-
targetRef: pipeline:New Business — Q1 2026
|
|
1974
|
-
type: belongs_to_project
|
|
1975
|
-
- sourceRef: deal:Vanta Labs — Pilot Evaluation
|
|
1976
|
-
targetRef: pipeline:New Business — Q1 2026
|
|
1977
|
-
type: belongs_to_project
|
|
1978
|
-
- sourceRef: deal:Meridian Finance — 2026 Renewal + Expansion
|
|
1979
|
-
targetRef: pipeline:Renewals & Expansion — Q1 2026
|
|
1980
|
-
type: belongs_to_project
|
|
1616
|
+
- sourceProfileSlug: client
|
|
1617
|
+
targetProfileSlug: company
|
|
1618
|
+
type: belongs_to
|
|
1619
|
+
- sourceProfileSlug: client
|
|
1620
|
+
targetProfileSlug: contact
|
|
1621
|
+
type: primary_contact
|
|
1622
|
+
- sourceProfileSlug: partner
|
|
1623
|
+
targetProfileSlug: company
|
|
1624
|
+
type: works_with
|
|
1625
|
+
- sourceProfileSlug: partner
|
|
1626
|
+
targetProfileSlug: contact
|
|
1627
|
+
type: primary_contact
|
|
1628
|
+
- sourceProfileSlug: partner
|
|
1629
|
+
targetProfileSlug: client
|
|
1630
|
+
type: refers
|
|
1981
1631
|
displayTemplates:
|
|
1982
1632
|
- name: Deal Card
|
|
1983
1633
|
description: Sales deal with pipeline stage, value, probability, and linked company
|
|
@@ -2568,6 +2218,45 @@ integrations:
|
|
|
2568
2218
|
onboarding:
|
|
2569
2219
|
goal: Capture the user's sales pipeline shape, their key accounts/contacts, and how they qualify and move deals — so the CRM reflects their real revenue motion, not a generic template.
|
|
2570
2220
|
framing: "Act as a sharp revenue/sales-ops lead. Tease out how they actually sell: who they sell to, what stages a deal moves through, where leads come from, and what 'qualified' means to them. Translate their words into pipeline config, companies, contacts, and deals."
|
|
2221
|
+
expertise:
|
|
2222
|
+
starters:
|
|
2223
|
+
- >
|
|
2224
|
+
Don't ask for stages on a blank slate — infer the motion first and propose
|
|
2225
|
+
a default pipeline for it. PLG: Signup → Activated → PQL → Expansion.
|
|
2226
|
+
Sales-led: Discovery → Qualified → Demo → Proposal → Negotiation → Closed.
|
|
2227
|
+
Agency/retainer: Lead → Scoping → Proposal → Won → Delivery. Offer the one
|
|
2228
|
+
that fits and let them cut stages, rather than starting from nothing.
|
|
2229
|
+
- >
|
|
2230
|
+
Define every stage by a BUYER action, not a seller activity — "Demo booked"
|
|
2231
|
+
or "Security review passed", not "Following up" or "Sent email". Seller-verb
|
|
2232
|
+
stages are why pipelines rot: they describe effort, not progress. If they
|
|
2233
|
+
name an activity stage, reflect it back as the buyer commitment it's meant
|
|
2234
|
+
to prove.
|
|
2235
|
+
- >
|
|
2236
|
+
Anchor qualification to a named framework, don't leave "qualified" as a
|
|
2237
|
+
feeling. Propose BANT for transactional deals or MEDDIC for enterprise, then
|
|
2238
|
+
make the exit criteria out of it — e.g. a deal can't leave Qualified without
|
|
2239
|
+
a known budget, an identified economic buyer, and a compelling event.
|
|
2240
|
+
blindSpots:
|
|
2241
|
+
- >
|
|
2242
|
+
The "everything is 'in progress'" pipeline. If most deals sit in middle
|
|
2243
|
+
stages with no close date or next step, that's not a pipeline, it's a
|
|
2244
|
+
graveyard — hygiene has collapsed. Push for a next step + a date on every
|
|
2245
|
+
open deal, and be willing to mark the dead ones lost.
|
|
2246
|
+
- >
|
|
2247
|
+
A stage with no exit criteria is a wish, not a stage. If they can't tell you
|
|
2248
|
+
the ONE thing that must be true to advance a deal, the stage is theater.
|
|
2249
|
+
Force a crisp gate for each — what the buyer must have done to move forward.
|
|
2250
|
+
- >
|
|
2251
|
+
Founders track deal value but not the two numbers that actually predict
|
|
2252
|
+
revenue: win rate by stage and average sales-cycle length. Without them you
|
|
2253
|
+
can't forecast or spot where deals stall. Surface both early even if the
|
|
2254
|
+
first answer is a rough guess.
|
|
2255
|
+
bar: >
|
|
2256
|
+
The pipeline stages mirror how a buyer actually commits (not how the rep works
|
|
2257
|
+
their day), each stage has a one-line exit gate, "qualified" maps to a real
|
|
2258
|
+
framework, and every live deal on the board has an owner, a value, a next step,
|
|
2259
|
+
and a close date — so a glance at the board tells the truth about revenue.
|
|
2571
2260
|
collect:
|
|
2572
2261
|
- profileSlug: pipeline
|
|
2573
2262
|
what: Their real deal stages in order (e.g. Lead → Qualified → Demo → Proposal → Won/Lost)
|