@synap-core/cli 1.8.0 → 1.11.0

package/templates/skills/stellar-scf-grants-advisor/examples/corpus-comparable-rows.md

@@ -0,0 +1,136 @@
+# Corpus comparable rows for Sheet 3
+
+Ready-to-use comparable rows for the Sheet 3 (Corpus Comparables) tab. Each row has the seven columns expected by Sheet 3: Project, Round, Budget, Verdict, Category, Profile snapshot, Lesson for current dossier.
+
+Copy the rows that match your current dossier's category and paste into the Excel COMPARABLES list in `templates/abstract-review-builder.py` or `templates/build-review-builder.py`.
+
+## Universal winners (always relevant, copy for context)
+
+| Project | Round | Budget | Verdict | Category | Profile snapshot | Lesson |
+|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
+| The Signal | SCF #42 | $121,000 | Won | B2B marketplace + escrow | 2 doxxed cofounders, DealEscrow.rs, Atomic Splits, B2B verticals named | Closest budget anchor for $115K-$125K dossiers |
+| Bando | SCF #42 | $75,000 | Won | RWA real estate Mexico | Doxxed team, named brokerage partner, country pilot | Anchor for narrow-pilot dossiers at $75K-$90K |
+| TheXBank | SCF #40 | $89,500 | Won | Africa banking | Doxxed team, country pilot named | Anchor for emerging-market banking $80K-$100K |
+| Rebond (target) | SCF #44 | $132,000 | TBD | Green bond RWA | Doxxed team, 4 LOIs, Art L.411-2 framework | Anchor for dossiers with named LOIs at $130K |
+| For Yield (target) | SCF #44 | $144,000 | TBD | Regulated DeFi yield | 11-team, PSCA AMF filed, 7-8M EUR AUM | Anchor for regulated DeFi at $140-145K |
+
+## Regulated finance comparables (yield vaults, lending, stablecoin rails)
+
+| Project | Round | Budget | Verdict | Category | Profile snapshot | Lesson |
+|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
+| For Yield (target) | SCF #44 | $144,000 | TBD | Regulated DeFi yield | 11-team, PSCA AMF filed, ACCEIS audit passed | Anchor for $140-145K with regulatory filing |
+| AION_FI Protocol | SCF #40 | $146,500 | Panel Review Failed | Credit cards | Anonymous team, no BIN sponsor | Same risk if regulatory partners not named |
+| Stablpay | SCF #40 | $129,100 | Panel Review Failed | Stablecoin rail India | No FIU partner named | Same risk for regulated geographies |
+| StellarCredit | SCF #42 | $55,000 | Panel Review Failed | Invoice factoring | No licensing plan | Regulated lending without license |
+| Kyros OS | SCF #41 | $135,000 | Rejected | Spanish tax compliance | No AEAT partner | Regulated category needs named partner |
+| Easner | SCF #40 | $150,000 | Panel Review Failed | "Stripe for Stablecoins" | Generic positioning + no banking partner | Stripe-for-X is overused; needs specific framework |
+| Goated App | SCF #41 | $120,000 | Rejected | Predictions / gambling | No licensing plan | Predictions need explicit licensing |
+| ASGCard | SCF #42 | $120,000 | Rejected | Virtual card issuance for AI agents | No BIN sponsor named | Same as AION_FI |
+
+## RWA comparables (real estate, bonds, commodities, gold)
+
+| Project | Round | Budget | Verdict | Category | Profile snapshot | Lesson |
+|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
+| Bando | SCF #42 | $75,000 | Won | RWA Mexico real estate | Doxxed, named brokerage partner | Narrow-pilot model wins at $75-90K |
+| Rebond (target) | SCF #44 | $132,000 | TBD | Green bonds | 4 LOIs, Art L.411-2 framework | Anchor for $130K with LOIs |
+| Lend.xyz | SCF #42 | $120,000 | Rejected | RWA real estate | Lost to Bando same round | Audit prior winners before submitting same vertical |
+| Etherfuse (Integration List) | n/a | n/a | n/a | Stablebond infrastructure | RWA-adjacent | Integration List item to leverage if applicable |
+
+## B2B marketplace and escrow comparables
+
+| Project | Round | Budget | Verdict | Category | Profile snapshot | Lesson |
+|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
+| The Signal | SCF #42 | $121,000 | Won | B2B escrow with Atomic Splits | Doxxed founders, prior shipped product | Use as primary anchor |
+| Offer-Hub | SCF #40 | $90,000 | Panel Review Failed | B2B platform | Unspecified scope issues | Vague B2B platform framing is fatal |
+| Tickie (target) | SCF #44 | $130-145K | TBD | B2B ticketing + secondary | 70+ B2B clients, 814K EUR GMV 2025, French Tech Tremplin | Anchor for B2B with deep commercial traction |
+
+## Consumer apps and gaming comparables
+
+| Project | Round | Budget | Verdict | Category | Profile snapshot | Lesson |
+|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
+| StellarRead | SCF #40 | $150,000 | Panel Review Failed | Read-to-earn | Earn-to-X at max budget | 100 pct rejection rate for earn-to-X |
+| Stellar Nexus Experience | SCF #40 | $60,000 | Panel Review Failed | XP / badges learn-to-earn | Earn-to-X | Same |
+| EduAfrica Learning App | SCF #40 | $89,000 | Rejected | Learn-to-earn Africa | Vague TAM + earn-to-X | Pattern stack |
+| Gameduk | SCF #40 | $60,000 | Panel Review Failed | Gamified EdTech | Earn-to-X | Same |
+| $NRG Token (BLOND:ISH) | SCF #41 | $150,000 | Rejected | Fan token rewards | Solana porting + max ask + earn-to-X | Triple pattern stack |
+| Solar Braves (target) | SCF #44 | $121-132K | TBD | Stellar-native dungeon RPG | AveForge studio, prior live game RPS on MegaETH | Anchor for Stellar-native consumer game |
+
+## Infrastructure and developer tooling comparables
+
+| Project | Round | Budget | Verdict | Category | Profile snapshot | Lesson |
+|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
+| Latch + KMP | SCF #41 RFP | RFP | Won | C-Address compliance tooling | RFP fit | Anchor for compliance projects |
+| Orion + OctoPos | SCF #41 RFP | RFP | Won | DeFi Positions API | Open data API across DeFi | Anchor for indexer projects |
+| Rumble Fish | SCF #41 RFP | RFP | Won | Block Explorer | Technical depth | Anchor for explorer / observability |
+| OBSRVR Prism | SCF #41 RFP | RFP | Won | Block Explorer | Observability layer | Same |
+| C-Address Toolkit | SCF #41 | $120,000 | Rejected | Compliance | Lost to Latch + KMP | Same-RFP overlap |
+| StellarScope | SCF #41 | $90,000 | Rejected | DeFi Positions API | Lost to Orion + OctoPos | Same-RFP overlap |
+| Soroban-first Block Explorer | SCF #41 | $75,000 | Rejected | Block Explorer | Lost to Rumble Fish + OBSRVR Prism | Generic naming + overlap |
+| Stellar Playground v2 | SCF #40 | $90,000 | Rejected | Soroban dev playground | Duplicates SDF tooling (scaffold-soroban, Stellar Lab) | Pattern 6: SDF roadmap overlap |
+
+## Anonymous-team warnings (use for any high-ask non-doxxed dossier)
+
+| Project | Round | Budget | Verdict | Category | Profile snapshot | Lesson |
+|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
+| Sorotrack | SCF #40 + #41 + #42 | $150K + $50K + $50K | Panel Review Failed (3x) | Tracker | Solo dev only by handle "Gemy" | Doxxing depth matters at high budget |
+| AION_FI Protocol | SCF #40 | $146,500 | Panel Review Failed | Credit cards | Anonymous team | Pattern 1 + Pattern 2 + Pattern 8 |
+| Tessera Labs | SCF #42 | $150,000 | Rejected | Confidential payments | Anonymous + brand collision + duplicates X-Ray | Three patterns stacked |
+| reb.cash | SCF #42 | $150,000 | Rejected | Unspecified | Anonymous, no website, max ask | Triple stack |
+| REAPP | SCF #42 | $115,000 | Rejected | x402 implementation | Anonymous | Pattern 1 alone is enough |
+| Pollar | SCF #42 | $72,000 | Rejected | Unspecified | Anonymous | Even at sub-max, doxxing matters |
+
+## Multi-chain bolt-on warnings (use for any port-from-EVM-or-Solana dossier)
+
+| Project | Round | Budget | Verdict | Category | Profile snapshot | Lesson |
+|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
+| Nuvolari.ai | SCF #42 | $84,000 | Rejected | Sonic-native AI yield, port to Stellar | Bolt-on without Stellar reason | Stellar-specific story needed |
+| Nomadz | SCF #42 | $150,000 | Rejected | Solana travel app | Bolt-on + max ask | Same |
+| Astrix | SCF #41 | $95,000 | Rejected | Algorand fan platform porting | Bolt-on | Same |
+| WOWMAX | SCF #41 | $109,000 | Rejected | EVM DEX aggregator | Bolt-on | Same |
+| Kima | SCF #40 | $133,000 | Rejected | Multi-chain interop | Stellar as one of N | Bolt-on framing |
+| All Access Fans | SCF #42 | $150,000 | Rejected | Nigerian Web2 OnlyFans-alt | Bolt-on + Web2 framing | Stack |
+| PathPulse AI | SCF #41 + #42 | $137K / $128K | Rejected 2x | Computer-vision data network | Bolt-on twice | Reapplying without addressing bolt-on does not help |
+
+## SDF roadmap overlap warnings (use for ZK, PQC, alternate VM, dev playground dossiers)
+
+| Project | Round | Budget | Verdict | Category | Profile snapshot | Lesson |
+|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
+| Nebula Wallet | SCF #41, #42 | $129,000+ | Rejected | Post-quantum crypto wallet | Duplicates SDF's protocol-level PQC | Wallet-level PQC overlaps SDF roadmap |
+| zkVault | SCF #42 | $130,000 | Rejected | ZK MFA wallet | Duplicates Protocol 25 X-Ray | Same X-Ray duplication |
+| StellaRay | SCF #42 | $80,000 | Rejected | ZK wallet | Duplicates X-Ray | Same |
+| Galeon | SCF #42 | $88,000 | Panel Review Failed | Privacy / compliance tooling | Duplicates X-Ray rollout | Same |
+| Move-to-Stellar | SCF #42 | $115,000 | Rejected | Alternate VM | Contradicts SDF's Rust+WASM choice | Direct contradiction |
+| Stellar Playground v2 | SCF #40 | $90,000 | Rejected | Soroban dev playground | Duplicates scaffold-soroban + Stellar Lab + Okashi | Tooling overlap |
+
+## Brand collision warnings
+
+| Project | Round | Budget | Verdict | Category | Profile snapshot | Lesson |
+|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
+| Tessera Labs | SCF #42 | $150,000 | Rejected | Confidential payments | Same name as a16z's Tessera ERP | Google before submitting |
+| Theo: USDC for Haiti | SCF #44 (live) | TBD | TBD | Payment app | Same name as theo.xyz Hack VC trading firm | Same |
+| Neon Wallet | SCF #40 | $129,000 | Rejected | Wallet | Same name as Neo blockchain Neon AND Solana Neon EVM | Triple collision |
+| Solo | SCF #40 + #44 | varies | Rejected | Banking | Same name as SatoshiPay Solar Wallet | Stellar ecosystem internal collision |
+| Stableyard | SCF #40 | $119,500 | Rejected | Asia QR network | Same name as Stables/Stable token | Stablecoin sector collision |
+| BelugaSwap | SCF #41 | unspecified | Rejected | BSC port | Same name as BSC BelugaSwap | Same crypto sector |
+| AutoFi | SCF #40 then #41 (won) | varies | Won after rebrand | Auto financing | Same name as US AutoFi Inc | Won after addressing |
+
+## Information Collection (incomplete dossier) warnings
+
+| Project | Round | Budget | Verdict | Category | Profile snapshot | Lesson |
+|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
+| The Strategists | SCF #42 | $150,000 | Information Collection | unspecified | Never compiled to panel | Empty mandatory fields kill |
+| Cushion | SCF #41 | $118,400 | Information Collection | unspecified | Never compiled | Same |
+| Payala | SCF #41 | $150,000 | Information Collection | Payments | Never compiled | Same |
+| Neon Wallet | SCF #41 | $129,000 | Information Collection | Wallet | Never compiled | Same plus brand collision |
+| SendbyKatika | SCF #40 | $150,000 | Pre-screen Failed | unspecified | Never passed pre-screen | Same |
+
+## How to pick comparables for Sheet 3
+
+For each new dossier, pick 10 to 15 rows from this catalog plus the current dossier as row 1 (with "TBD" verdict). Pick a mix:
+
+- 3 to 4 close-category winners (anchor and contrast).
+- 4 to 5 close-category rejects (warning patterns triggered).
+- 2 to 3 cross-category illustrations (bolt-on warning, SDF overlap warning, doxxing warning) if patterns apply.
+- 2 in-flight targets (Rebond, For Yield, Solar Braves, Tickie) where the profile matches.
+
+The Sheet 3 row order matters: closest comparable first after the current dossier. The client should be able to see at a glance "we look like X (winner) more than Y (reject)".

package/templates/skills/stellar-scf-grants-advisor/examples/q10-team-rewrites.md

@@ -0,0 +1,109 @@
+# Q10 Team rewrites (2000 chars max)
+
+Three fully-developed Q10 team rewrites showing how to surface credentials that the founder may have left out. Each follows the winning template per founder: full name, role, LinkedIn URL, education, experience (specific named companies + roles + years), notable recognitions, role at the project.
+
+## Example 1: Three co-founders with strong LinkedIn (Antevorta style)
+
+Use this template when the team has impressive credentials that the original Q10 draft underplayed.
+
+> Vincent [LastName], CEO and Co-founder (Paris, France)
+> LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/[handle]/
+> Education: SKEMA Business School PGE Track Finance and Quants 2024-2026, Nova SBE Lisbon Master Impact Entrepreneurship 2022-2023.
+> Experience: Nordea Asset Management (financial models for institutional clients across Europe, Singapore, Latam on Equity, Fixed Income, Multi-Asset SICAV funds), BNP Paribas Client Advisor (wealth management initiatives), Bitget COO Apprentice Program (crypto ecosystem partnerships).
+> Role at [Project]: leads regulatory framework (Art L.411-2 CMF, placement prive) and CGP distribution channel.
+>
+> Jules [LastName], COO and Co-founder (Paris, France)
+> LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/[handle]/
+> Education: SKEMA Business School Master PGE Finance, Strategy, Entrepreneurship 2024-2027, Toronto Metropolitan University exchange Spring 2026 International Finance.
+> Experience: Banque Populaire Corporate Account Manager intern, Red Bull Student Marketeer.
+> Role at [Project]: market sourcing, HNW relationship management, vault partner relations.
+>
+> William Muller, CTO and Co-founder ([city], Belgium)
+> LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/[handle]/
+> GitHub: https://github.com/[handle]
+> Education: KU Leuven Master Financial Economics.
+> Recognition: Top 0.1 percent at IMC Worldwide Quant Trading Competition (out of 30,000+ participants).
+> Experience: Bitget Builder 1+ year, Greenhill Capital Belgium Student Investment Club (385K EUR AUM).
+> Certifications: DeFi (Future of Finance), PE/VC, Bloomberg Market Concepts.
+> Role at [Project]: Soroban smart contract architecture, backend, vault custody integration.
+>
+> Company: [Project] SAS (RCS Paris [registry number]).
+> Website: https://[domain]/ | X: @[handle].
+
+Character count: 1849.
+
+## Example 2: Two co-founders, deep B2B traction (The Signal style)
+
+Use this template when the team has prior shipped product credentials.
+
+> Samir Touinssi, CEO and Co-founder ([city], [country])
+> LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/[handle]/
+> Experience: Founder, The Arch Consulting (Stellar SCF grants advisory practice, $XM+ in advised grants since 2024). Content creator 10+ years across [platforms], cumulative [N]M+ audience reach. Prior product: Stripe Connect B2B platform [Name], 50+ verified service providers, $1.2M GMV across 200+ deals 2024-2025.
+> Role at The Signal: leads commercial strategy, B2B partnerships, and regulatory positioning.
+>
+> Leo Leung, COO and Co-founder ([city], [country])
+> LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/[handle]/
+> Education: Imperial College London Physics (graduated [year]).
+> Experience: Orichal Partners quant researcher (systematic trading strategies). Prior: [specific prior roles with named companies and years].
+> Role at The Signal: leads operations, smart contract architecture coordination, and platform analytics.
+>
+> Company: [Entity Name] (RCS [city] [registry number]).
+> Website: https://thesignal-marketplace.com/ | X: @[handle].
+
+Character count: 990. Short and dense, with verifiable prior shipping credits.
+
+## Example 3: Larger team with regulatory pedigree (For Yield style)
+
+Use this template when the team has 5+ named people with institutional finance background.
+
+> Quentin Hopp, CEO and Co-founder (Paris, France)
+> LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/[handle]/
+> Experience: ex-AXA Wealth Services (regulated wealth product structuring), [specific prior role with named regulator-facing dossier delivery].
+> Role at For Yield: CEO, regulator-facing dossier (PSCA AMF), distribution to wealth advisors.
+>
+> Julien Daubert, Co-founder (Paris, France)
+> LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/[handle]/
+> Education: HEC Paris.
+> Experience: 10H11 (asset management, [specific scope]).
+> Role at For Yield: investment strategy, allocator integrations.
+>
+> Saturnin Paulet, Co-founder (Paris, France)
+> LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/[handle]/
+> Experience: founder, Crypto and Macro media (35K subscribers across newsletter, YouTube, Twitter).
+> Role at For Yield: brand and content distribution to crypto-curious HNW investors.
+>
+> [CTO Full Name], CTO and Co-founder ([city, country])
+> LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/[handle]/
+> GitHub: https://github.com/[handle]
+> Experience: prior Soroban contract shipping, prior multi-chain DeFi infrastructure (named projects).
+> Role at For Yield: Soroban contract architecture (YieldVault.rs, PerfFeeModule.rs, EURC SAC wrapper).
+>
+> [Plus 7 additional team members across legal, compliance, ops, marketing, engineering. Names and LinkedIn URLs in attached one-pager.]
+>
+> Advisors: [Named advisors with regulator-facing pedigree].
+>
+> Company: For Yield SAS (RCS Paris [registry number]). PSCA AMF dossier filed April 2026.
+> Website: https://foryield.com/ | X: @[handle].
+
+Character count: 1571.
+
+## Common Q10 mistakes to avoid
+
+- Founder identified only by first name or handle. Always full name.
+- Missing LinkedIn URL. Always include verifiable URL with the slug exactly matching the profile.
+- Missing GitHub URL for CTO. Mandatory.
+- Vague experience ("experience in finance"). Specify named company, role, years.
+- Recognitions not surfaced (the IMC Top 0.1 percent, French Tech Tremplin laureate, Bitget COO Apprentice, Y Combinator alum). These are credibility multipliers.
+- Missing advisors when the team is junior. Add one or two named advisors with sector pedigree.
+- Missing legal entity reference (Company SAS, RCS [number]).
+- Q11 (number of team members) does not match the count of distinct people in Q10.
+
+## Q10 character calibration
+
+The field accepts 2000 characters. Most strong Q10s land at 1700-1950 characters. If you go below 1400, the team is undersold. If you exceed 1990 you cannot safely edit later.
+
+## What "underselling" looks like in practice
+
+A common pattern we see in client drafts: the founder writes "Vincent has experience in finance" while their LinkedIn shows SKEMA Track Finance and Quants + Nordea Asset Management institutional clients across Europe/Singapore/Latam + BNP Paribas Client Advisor + Bitget COO Apprentice. That gap (one line vs four named credentials) is the difference between a UNDERSELLING flag and a STRONG flag.
+
+When you review a Q10, always cross-reference the LinkedIn URL the founder provides (or that you find) against what the draft says. If the LinkedIn shows more, the draft is undersold. Surface what is on LinkedIn (positively only; never contradict the founder's own description).

package/templates/skills/stellar-scf-grants-advisor/examples/q2-description-rewrites.md

@@ -0,0 +1,88 @@
+# Q2 Description rewrites (1000 chars max)
+
+Five fully-developed rewrites for the five most common SCF dossier categories. Each lands at 900-980 characters and follows the winning template: positioning, product, why Stellar, traction, day-1 distribution.
+
+## Category 1: Regulated DeFi yield (anchor: For Yield target $144K)
+
+> For Yield is the first French MiCA-aligned DeFi yield vault on Stellar, channelling licensed EU capital into Soroban via DeFindex, Blend v2, Aquarius and Soroswap.
+>
+> The product: YieldVault.rs (Soroban, MIT open-source) wraps the DeFindex allocator across Blend lending pools and Aquarius LP positions. PerfFeeModule.rs streams performance fees to LPs. EURC SAC wrapper handles EUR-denominated entries.
+>
+> Why Stellar: regulated EU investors need EURC-native rails and 5-second finality for compliant NAV reporting. EVM gas would break vault economics at the €100K-€500K ticket sizes our PSCA AMF dossier targets.
+>
+> Traction: PSCA AMF dossier filed April 2026, EP simplifie filed parallel, ACCEIS audit passed, 50 HNW clients onboarded, €7-8M AUM committed.
+>
+> Day-1 distribution: AXA Wealth Services pipeline, CGP network across France, Crypto and Macro media (35K subscribers).
+
+Character count: 957.
+
+## Category 2: B2B marketplace with Soroban escrow (anchor: The Signal $121K winner)
+
+> [Project] is a B2B settlement layer for [vertical], serving [specific buyer-supplier dynamic] with Soroban-native atomic escrow.
+>
+> The product: DealEscrow.rs (Soroban, MIT open-source) holds buyer funds in USDC and releases them via Atomic Splits to suppliers, brokers, and platform on milestone completion. Stellar Wallets Kit handles wallet onboarding.
+>
+> Why Stellar: per-deal escrow rebalancing happens 5 to 10 times per transaction lifecycle. EVM gas (multi-dollar per call) would erode our 2 to 4 percent platform commission. Stellar's sub-cent fees and 5-second finality let us settle in real time without breaking unit economics.
+>
+> Traction: prior Stripe Connect product with 50+ verified service providers, $1.2M GMV across 200+ deals 2024-2025. 14 LOIs signed for Soroban migration. Founders prior shipping verifiable on LinkedIn and GitHub.
+>
+> Day-1 distribution: existing 50-provider network, plus 3 named B2B verticals committed (specifics on request).
+
+Character count: 974.
+
+## Category 3: RWA tokenization (anchor: Bando $75K winner, Rebond $132K target)
+
+> [Project] is a Soroban-native settlement layer for [asset class] in [jurisdiction], serving [specific issuer or investor segment].
+>
+> The product: [Asset]Token.rs (Soroban, MIT open-source) issues whitelisted [asset class] tokens with on-chain ownership transfer. KYCWhitelist.rs enforces accredited-investor checks via on-chain attestations. CouponDistributor.rs streams [yield or revenue share] to holders.
+>
+> Why Stellar: [asset class] trade in [low-margin secondary markets / institutional ticket sizes / cross-border flows] where [specific economic argument that EVM cannot match].
+>
+> Traction: [N] LOIs signed with named [issuers / underwriters / brokers] representing [€XM pipeline]. Regulatory framework: [Art L.411-2 CMF / MiFID II / MiCA / BaFin / equivalent]. Distribution partners: [Named Partner 1 (license), Named Partner 2 (license)].
+>
+> Day-1 distribution: [named regulated channel], plus [secondary distribution channel].
+
+Character count: 945. Fill bracket placeholders with client specifics.
+
+## Category 4: Consumer game native to Stellar (anchor: Solar Braves target $121-132K)
+
+> [Project] is a Stellar-native [game genre] where every player asset, every economy interaction, and every progression milestone settles on Soroban in real time.
+>
+> The product: [GameContract].rs (Soroban, MIT open-source) handles [specific in-game economic primitive: item ownership, crafting outcomes, PvP escrow, etc.]. Stellar Wallets Kit plus Passkey Kit plus Privy onboard crypto-native gamers, mainstream gamers, and Web2 gamers via the appropriate stack.
+>
+> Why Stellar: [game] involves [N] economic transactions per session. EVM gas of $0.05 to $2.00 per action breaks unit economics for [scale: 10K daily players, etc.]. Stellar's sub-cent fees and 5-second finality close the loop.
+>
+> Traction: prior game [Name] live on [chain], [users] paying users, [$revenue] revenue. Team shipping credits: [Studio releases, Hackathon wins].
+>
+> Day-1 distribution: existing [Name] player base, plus [community channel] with [N] engaged users.
+
+Character count: 956. The dossier should avoid earn-via-low-effort-activity language entirely (no earn-to-X).
+
+## Category 5: Infrastructure / developer tooling (anchor: Latch+KMP, Orion+OctoPos RFP winners)
+
+> [Project] is a [specific infrastructure category] for Stellar developers, complementing [named existing primitives] and addressing [specific gap].
+>
+> The product: [Tool].rs or [Tool].ts (open-source, MIT) provides [specific capability]. [Tool] uses [named SCF Integration List items] for [specific use case].
+>
+> Why Stellar: the [specific gap] affects [target developer audience]. Existing solutions [either duplicate SDF roadmap / target other chains / lack specific feature]. [Project] fills this gap without overlap with [Named Prior Funded Projects].
+>
+> Traction: [GitHub stars / dev signups / pilot integrations]. Team prior shipping: [specific credits]. The tool is at [URL] and uses [Specific Stellar SEPs or standards].
+>
+> Day-1 distribution: Stellar dev community via [Discord, Twitter, conference talks], plus [Named Stellar ecosystem partners] for integration support.
+
+Character count: 920. Infrastructure dossiers benefit from explicit "complementing X, not duplicating Y" framing.
+
+## Common Q2 mistakes to avoid
+
+These are the patterns that have caused Q2 rejections in past rounds:
+
+- No mention of Stellar in Q2 (Antevorta initial draft did this). The Q2 must name Stellar explicitly.
+- Generic "Why Stellar" (speed and low fees) that could apply to any chain. Specify the per-transaction economic argument.
+- Earn-to-X language ("earn rewards by reading / watching / playing"). 100 percent rejection rate.
+- Token launch mention without regulatory framing.
+- Vague TAM ("Pan-Africa", "2 billion users", "global creator economy").
+- Project name as the category ("Stellar Fintech OS").
+
+## Q2 character calibration
+
+The field accepts 1000 characters. Aim for 900-980. Below 850 the dossier feels under-baked. Above 990 you cannot safely edit later. Tools like https://wordcounter.net let you verify before pasting.

package/templates/skills/stellar-scf-grants-advisor/examples/q6-integration-rewrites.md

@@ -0,0 +1,107 @@
+# Q6 Integration Description rewrites (1000 chars max)
+
+Five paste-ready Q6 rewrites by category. Each follows the winning template: three-phase timeline, named Soroban contracts, named SCF Integration List items, why-Stellar economic argument, MIT open-source commitment, supporting infrastructure separated from Integration Track scope.
+
+## Category 1: Regulated DeFi yield vault (For Yield style, 7 Integration List items)
+
+> For Yield uses Soroban as the settlement and routing layer for a regulated EU DeFi yield vault.
+>
+> Phase 1 (Months 1-2): YieldVault.rs and PerfFeeModule.rs core implementation, MIT open-source. EURC SAC wrapper for EUR-denominated deposits.
+>
+> Phase 2 (Months 3-4): wallet onboarding via Stellar Wallets Kit and DFNS for institutional MPC custody. DeFindex integration as primary yield allocator.
+>
+> Phase 3 (Months 5-6): Blend v2 lending pool routing, Aquarius and Soroswap DEX/LP routing, Allbridge for cross-chain inflows from EVM stablecoin holders, mainnet launch.
+>
+> Why Stellar: vault rebalancing happens 5 to 10 times per allocation cycle. EVM gas would erode 0.5 to 1 percent of NAV per cycle. Stellar sub-cent fees keep performance fees intact.
+>
+> Architecture sourced from 7 official SCF Integration List items: DeFindex, Blend v2, Aquarius, Soroswap, Allbridge, DFNS, Stellar Wallets Kit.
+>
+> Supporting infrastructure (NOT Integration Track scope): Fireblocks for institutional custody, Elliptic for screening, Certora audit covered by Stellar LaunchKit credit at Tranche 2 review, Notabene for Travel Rule.
+
+Character count: 994. Just under the limit, calibrate down to 990 if needed.
+
+## Category 2: B2B marketplace with Soroban escrow (The Signal style)
+
+> [Project] uses Soroban as the escrow and atomic settlement layer for B2B [vertical] transactions.
+>
+> Phase 1 (Months 1-2): DealEscrow.rs core implementation with Atomic Splits payout logic, MIT open-source. SAC integration for USDC settlement.
+>
+> Phase 2 (Months 3-4): wallet onboarding via Stellar Wallets Kit (Freighter, Albedo, LOBSTR, xBull). Embedded wallet via Privy for non-crypto-native suppliers.
+>
+> Phase 3 (Months 5-6): dispute resolution module, multi-party Atomic Splits for broker/supplier/platform fee distribution, mainnet launch with 3 named pilot verticals.
+>
+> Why Stellar: each deal involves 4 to 8 settlement events (release, refund, broker commission, platform fee, supplier payout). On EVM each settlement would cost $2-$8 in gas, breaking platform unit economics at $500-$5,000 average deal size. Stellar sub-cent fees and 5-second finality close the loop.
+>
+> Architecture sourced from 3 SCF Integration List items: Stellar Wallets Kit, Privy, Anchor Platform (USDC anchor for fiat ramp).
+>
+> Supporting infrastructure (NOT Integration Track scope): Certora audit via Stellar LaunchKit credit.
+
+Character count: 985.
+
+## Category 3: RWA tokenization (Rebond style, regulated bonds)
+
+> [Project] uses Soroban as the ownership transfer and coupon settlement layer for [asset class] tokenized under [Art L.411-2 CMF / MiFID II / equivalent framework].
+>
+> Phase 1 (Months 1-2): [Asset]Token.rs core implementation with whitelist-only transfer logic, KYCWhitelist.rs for accredited-investor attestations, MIT open-source.
+>
+> Phase 2 (Months 3-4): CouponDistributor.rs for automated yield distribution to token holders. Wallet onboarding via Stellar Wallets Kit and DFNS for HNW custody.
+>
+> Phase 3 (Months 5-6): secondary market settlement, regulator-facing reporting export, mainnet launch with [N] LOIs converted to active issuances.
+>
+> Why Stellar: coupon distribution to 100 to 1,000 holders happens quarterly. EVM gas at scale would cost $500-$5,000 per coupon event. Stellar settles the entire distribution for under $10.
+>
+> Architecture sourced from 3 SCF Integration List items: Stellar Wallets Kit, DFNS, Allbridge (cross-chain stablecoin inflows from EVM holders).
+>
+> Supporting infrastructure (NOT Integration Track scope): Fireblocks for issuer custody, Notabene for Travel Rule, Certora audit via LaunchKit credit.
+
+Character count: 992.
+
+## Category 4: Consumer game native to Stellar (Solar Braves style)
+
+> [Project] uses Soroban as the on-chain economy layer for [game type], settling item ownership, crafting, and progression milestones in real time.
+>
+> Phase 1 (Months 1-2): [GameContract].rs core implementation handling item ownership and crafting outcomes, MIT open-source. SAC wrapper for in-game USDC payouts.
+>
+> Phase 2 (Months 3-4): wallet onboarding via Stellar Wallets Kit (crypto-native), Passkey Kit (mainstream gamers, no seed phrase), Privy (Web2 gamers via email or social).
+>
+> Phase 3 (Months 5-6): cross-game item portability via standardized metadata, PvP escrow contracts, mainnet launch with [N] daily players target.
+>
+> Why Stellar: a typical session involves 10 to 50 economic actions (item pickups, crafting attempts, PvP wagers, marketplace listings). EVM gas of $0.05-$2.00 per action would make session economics impossible at retail scale. Stellar sub-cent fees enable the full loop.
+>
+> Architecture sourced from 3 SCF Integration List items: Stellar Wallets Kit, Passkey Kit (as wallet onboarding sub-component), Privy.
+>
+> Supporting infrastructure (NOT Integration Track scope): standard cloud (AWS/GCP), Certora audit via LaunchKit credit.
+
+Character count: 998. Calibrate down to 994 by tightening adjectives.
+
+## Category 5: Compliance / developer tooling (Latch+KMP RFP style)
+
+> [Project] is a Soroban-aware [compliance category: identity attestation, audit trail, screening] primitive plus a hosted reference implementation.
+>
+> Phase 1 (Months 1-2): [Tool].rs Soroban contract for [specific verifiable on-chain claim], MIT open-source. CLI and SDK in TypeScript.
+>
+> Phase 2 (Months 3-4): integration with Stellar Wallets Kit for end-user sign-off, integration with Privy for embedded wallet flows. Web reference dashboard.
+>
+> Phase 3 (Months 5-6): integration testing with [Named Prior Stellar-Funded Projects], audit by [vendor], mainnet launch.
+>
+> Why Stellar: [compliance category] requires on-chain verifiable attestations. Stellar's SAC and Soroban event model expose the attestation in a form Stellar wallets, anchors, and indexers can consume natively, eliminating multi-chain reconciliation cost.
+>
+> Architecture sourced from 2 SCF Integration List items: Stellar Wallets Kit, Privy.
+>
+> Supporting infrastructure (NOT Integration Track scope): cloud hosting (AWS/GCP), Certora audit via Stellar LaunchKit credit.
+
+Character count: 956.
+
+## Common Q6 mistakes to avoid
+
+- Generic "Soroban smart contracts" without naming them. Always name the contracts (DealEscrow.rs, YieldVault.rs, GoldCoin.rs).
+- ERC-4626 mentioned on Stellar (Ethereum standard, not Stellar). Use SAC and Soroban-native vault patterns.
+- EURC mentioned without StellarAssetContract (SAC) wrapper context.
+- Fireblocks, Elliptic, Certora named as Integration Track items (they are not on the list). Always reposition as supporting infrastructure.
+- No phasing. Always Months 1-2 / 3-4 / 5-6.
+- No open-source commitment. Always commit to MIT (or Apache 2.0) explicitly.
+- Not counting Integration List items explicitly. Always end Q6 with "Architecture sourced from N official SCF Integration List items: X, Y, Z."
+
+## Q6 character calibration
+
+Same calibration as Q2: aim for 900-980 characters. The Integration Description is one of the two most-read fields by reviewers (along with Q2). Land it tight and specific.

package/templates/skills/stellar-scf-grants-advisor/examples/tranche-structures.md

@@ -0,0 +1,176 @@
+# Tranche structures with verifiable evidence
+
+Three reference Tranche 1/2/3 structures by category. Each deliverable shows the level of specificity the panel expects: named contract, measurable completion criteria, verifiable reviewer evidence, estimated date, budget.
+
+## Reference structure: 3 equivalent tranches
+
+SCF mandates roughly equal tranches. Clean splits:
+
+| Total budget | Tranche size | Use case |
+|---|---|---|
+| $75,000 | $25,000 each | Narrow pilot dossier (Bando style) |
+| $90,000 | $30,000 each | Single-contract dossier |
+| $108,000 | $36,000 each | Two-contract dossier |
+| $121,200 | $40,400 each | The Signal anchor |
+| $132,000 | $44,000 each | Rebond anchor |
+| $135,000 | $45,000 each | Three-contract dossier |
+| $144,000 | $48,000 each | For Yield anchor |
+
+## Example A: B2B marketplace ($121,200 across 3 tranches of $40,400)
+
+### Tranche 1 (MVP, T+8 weeks)
+
+Deliverable 1.1: DealEscrow.rs contract development
+- Description: Soroban contract with deposit, milestone-based release, dispute hold logic.
+- Measure of completion: contract deployed to Stellar testnet with verifiable address; test suite covering 95 percent of paths passing in CI; security review pass by internal team.
+- Reviewer evidence: testnet contract ID + transaction hashes for 10+ test transactions; GitHub PR link; CI run link.
+- Budget: $25,000.
+
+Deliverable 1.2: Atomic Splits payout module
+- Description: Soroban submodule splitting one deposit across N recipients (buyer refund, supplier payout, broker commission, platform fee).
+- Measure of completion: testnet contract with 5+ multi-party payouts executed.
+- Reviewer evidence: testnet transaction hashes showing multi-recipient splits; integration test report.
+- Budget: $15,400.
+
+### Tranche 2 (Testnet, T+16 weeks)
+
+Deliverable 2.1: Wallet onboarding via Stellar Wallets Kit
+- Description: end-to-end flow from Freighter / Albedo / LOBSTR / xBull connection to first deposit.
+- Measure of completion: 20+ beta users complete onboarding on testnet across 4 wallet types.
+- Reviewer evidence: testnet activity dashboard URL; user feedback summary.
+- Budget: $18,000.
+
+Deliverable 2.2: Privy embedded wallet flow
+- Description: non-crypto-native suppliers onboarded via email or social login.
+- Measure of completion: 10+ suppliers onboarded via Privy on testnet.
+- Reviewer evidence: testnet activity; Privy integration documentation.
+- Budget: $12,000.
+
+Deliverable 2.3: Internal QA and audit prep
+- Description: full test coverage report; Certora-ready audit scope document.
+- Measure of completion: 98 percent test coverage; audit scope document delivered for LaunchKit credit redemption.
+- Reviewer evidence: coverage report; audit document.
+- Budget: $10,400.
+
+### Tranche 3 (Mainnet, T+24 weeks)
+
+Deliverable 3.1: Mainnet deployment
+- Description: contracts deployed to Stellar mainnet; first 3 production deals settled.
+- Measure of completion: mainnet contract ID published; 3+ real-money deals settled.
+- Reviewer evidence: mainnet transaction hashes; deal summary.
+- Budget: $20,000.
+
+Deliverable 3.2: Quantified mainnet activity
+- Description: 50+ mainnet deals across 3 named B2B verticals; $250K+ GMV.
+- Measure of completion: 50 deals confirmed; $250K cumulative GMV verifiable on Stellar Expert.
+- Reviewer evidence: dashboard URL with mainnet activity; vertical breakdown.
+- Budget: $20,400.
+
+Note for Q16: SCF grant funds product development only. Marketing, paid distribution, content creator campaigns, and community rewards are self-funded by [Project] via existing revenue.
+
+## Example B: Regulated DeFi yield ($144,000 across 3 tranches of $48,000)
+
+### Tranche 1 (MVP, T+8 weeks)
+
+Deliverable 1.1: YieldVault.rs core implementation
+- Description: Soroban vault with deposit, withdrawal, NAV computation, EURC-denominated entry.
+- Measure of completion: testnet deployment + 95 percent test coverage + ACCEIS-style internal review.
+- Reviewer evidence: testnet contract ID; CI test report; internal security review document.
+- Budget: $30,000.
+
+Deliverable 1.2: PerfFeeModule.rs
+- Description: Soroban submodule streaming performance fees to LPs and protocol treasury.
+- Measure of completion: testnet contract with 3+ fee distribution events at different NAV levels.
+- Reviewer evidence: testnet transaction hashes; fee model documentation.
+- Budget: $18,000.
+
+### Tranche 2 (Testnet, T+16 weeks)
+
+Deliverable 2.1: DeFindex integration
+- Description: vault allocator routes deposits across DeFindex strategies.
+- Measure of completion: testnet vault successfully routing to DeFindex with NAV reflecting strategy returns.
+- Reviewer evidence: testnet activity; DeFindex integration documentation.
+- Budget: $18,000.
+
+Deliverable 2.2: Blend v2 and Aquarius routing
+- Description: vault allocator extends to Blend lending pools and Aquarius LP positions.
+- Measure of completion: testnet vault with 3-venue allocation (DeFindex + Blend + Aquarius).
+- Reviewer evidence: testnet contract activity; allocation strategy document.
+- Budget: $18,000.
+
+Deliverable 2.3: Certora audit completion (via LaunchKit credit)
+- Description: full security audit by Certora.
+- Measure of completion: Certora audit report delivered with mitigations applied.
+- Reviewer evidence: audit report PDF; mitigation PRs.
+- Budget: $12,000 (covered by Stellar LaunchKit credit, not by grant funds).
+
+### Tranche 3 (Mainnet, T+24 weeks)
+
+Deliverable 3.1: Mainnet launch
+- Description: contracts deployed to Stellar mainnet; first cohort of HNW clients onboarded.
+- Measure of completion: mainnet contract ID; 5+ named HNW clients with active vault positions.
+- Reviewer evidence: mainnet transaction hashes; client summary (anonymized aggregate).
+- Budget: $30,000.
+
+Deliverable 3.2: Quantified mainnet AUM and reporting export
+- Description: €1M+ AUM in mainnet vault; PSCA-aligned reporting export.
+- Measure of completion: AUM verifiable on Stellar Expert; reporting export delivered.
+- Reviewer evidence: AUM dashboard; reporting document.
+- Budget: $18,000.
+
+Note for Q16: SCF grant funds product development and security audit only. Marketing, paid distribution, AMA hosts, content creator campaigns, and community rewards are self-funded by For Yield via the existing fundraising round.
+
+## Example C: RWA bond tokenization ($132,000 across 3 tranches of $44,000)
+
+### Tranche 1 (MVP, T+8 weeks)
+
+Deliverable 1.1: GreenBondToken.rs core
+- Description: whitelisted Soroban token contract with restricted transfer logic.
+- Measure of completion: testnet deployment + 95 percent test coverage + restricted-transfer test cases.
+- Reviewer evidence: testnet contract ID; CI report.
+- Budget: $25,000.
+
+Deliverable 1.2: KYCWhitelist.rs
+- Description: Soroban whitelist contract integrating accredited-investor attestation.
+- Measure of completion: testnet contract with 10+ test attestations applied to bond transfers.
+- Reviewer evidence: testnet activity; attestation model document.
+- Budget: $19,000.
+
+### Tranche 2 (Testnet, T+16 weeks)
+
+Deliverable 2.1: CouponDistributor.rs
+- Description: Soroban contract distributing quarterly coupons to whitelisted holders.
+- Measure of completion: testnet contract with 3+ coupon events to 50+ test holders.
+- Reviewer evidence: testnet transaction hashes; coupon distribution report.
+- Budget: $22,000.
+
+Deliverable 2.2: Stellar Wallets Kit + DFNS integration
+- Description: wallet onboarding for retail-accredited and HNW investors.
+- Measure of completion: testnet flow tested with 4 wallet types + DFNS custody.
+- Reviewer evidence: testnet activity; integration documentation.
+- Budget: $22,000.
+
+### Tranche 3 (Mainnet, T+24 weeks)
+
+Deliverable 3.1: Mainnet launch with first issuance
+- Description: first regulated bond issuance under Art L.411-2 CMF on Stellar mainnet.
+- Measure of completion: mainnet issuance contract; first €X,000,000 raised.
+- Reviewer evidence: mainnet transaction hashes; placement document.
+- Budget: $26,000.
+
+Deliverable 3.2: Quantified mainnet activity
+- Description: 3+ issuances converted from LOI pipeline (€10M+ cumulative); first coupon distribution on mainnet.
+- Measure of completion: issuances verifiable on Stellar Expert; coupon distribution executed.
+- Reviewer evidence: dashboard URL; issuance summary.
+- Budget: $18,000.
+
+Note for Q16: SCF grant funds product development and regulatory audit only. Marketing, distribution partner integrations, and community education are self-funded by [Project] via the LOI pipeline economics.
+
+## Tranche common mistakes
+
+- "Phase 1 build the contract" without a specific deliverable name or measure. The panel needs verifiable evidence per deliverable.
+- "Internal community testing" or "creator campaigns" as a Tranche deliverable. Reviewers read this as marketing budget misuse. Reframe as "internal QA + automated test coverage."
+- Tranche 3 with vague mainnet target. Always quantify: "X transactions, Y wallets, $Z TVL, N named clients."
+- Missing the Q16 grant note. Always include "SCF grant funds dev work only. Marketing self-funded."
+- Tranche sizes wildly unequal ($60K + $30K + $30K). Stay within roughly equal splits.
+- Audit cost inside the grant budget. The Stellar LaunchKit credit covers the audit; it should be flagged as such and not double-counted in grant disbursement.