@sylphx/flow 2.30.0 → 3.0.1

This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
Files changed (46) hide show
  1. package/CHANGELOG.md +32 -0
  2. package/assets/agents/builder.md +32 -1
  3. package/assets/slash-commands/issues.md +46 -0
  4. package/assets/slash-commands/refactor.md +60 -0
  5. package/package.json +1 -1
  6. package/src/config/servers.ts +1 -1
  7. package/src/core/flow-executor.ts +22 -9
  8. package/assets/agents/coder.md +0 -128
  9. package/assets/agents/reviewer.md +0 -123
  10. package/assets/agents/writer.md +0 -120
  11. package/assets/rules/code-standards.md +0 -176
  12. package/assets/rules/core.md +0 -197
  13. package/assets/skills/abuse-prevention/SKILL.md +0 -33
  14. package/assets/skills/account-security/SKILL.md +0 -35
  15. package/assets/skills/admin/SKILL.md +0 -37
  16. package/assets/skills/appsec/SKILL.md +0 -35
  17. package/assets/skills/auth/SKILL.md +0 -34
  18. package/assets/skills/billing/SKILL.md +0 -35
  19. package/assets/skills/code-quality/SKILL.md +0 -34
  20. package/assets/skills/competitive-analysis/SKILL.md +0 -29
  21. package/assets/skills/data-modeling/SKILL.md +0 -34
  22. package/assets/skills/database/SKILL.md +0 -34
  23. package/assets/skills/delivery/SKILL.md +0 -36
  24. package/assets/skills/deployments/SKILL.md +0 -33
  25. package/assets/skills/growth/SKILL.md +0 -31
  26. package/assets/skills/i18n/SKILL.md +0 -35
  27. package/assets/skills/ledger/SKILL.md +0 -32
  28. package/assets/skills/observability/SKILL.md +0 -32
  29. package/assets/skills/performance/SKILL.md +0 -33
  30. package/assets/skills/pricing/SKILL.md +0 -32
  31. package/assets/skills/privacy/SKILL.md +0 -36
  32. package/assets/skills/pwa/SKILL.md +0 -36
  33. package/assets/skills/referral/SKILL.md +0 -30
  34. package/assets/skills/seo/SKILL.md +0 -40
  35. package/assets/skills/storage/SKILL.md +0 -33
  36. package/assets/skills/support/SKILL.md +0 -31
  37. package/assets/skills/uiux/SKILL.md +0 -40
  38. package/assets/slash-commands/cleanup.md +0 -59
  39. package/assets/slash-commands/continue.md +0 -94
  40. package/assets/slash-commands/continue2.md +0 -61
  41. package/assets/slash-commands/improve.md +0 -153
  42. package/assets/slash-commands/init.md +0 -34
  43. package/assets/slash-commands/polish.md +0 -87
  44. package/assets/slash-commands/quality.md +0 -181
  45. package/assets/slash-commands/release.md +0 -103
  46. package/assets/slash-commands/review.md +0 -44
@@ -1,94 +0,0 @@
1
- ---
2
- name: continue
3
- description: Trigger autonomous product iteration - think, improve, ship
4
- ---
5
-
6
- # Continue
7
-
8
- Continuously commit.
9
-
10
- The entire system — not limited to data — must strictly obey a Single Source of Truth (SSOT) principle.
11
- Every state, behavior, flow, permission, architecture decision, UI behavior, and side effect
12
- must have exactly one authoritative source, one interpretation, and one correct path.
13
-
14
- The system must be fully reason-able end to end.
15
- There must be no implicit behavior, hidden assumptions, magic defaults, or silent fallbacks.
16
-
17
- Continuously and repeatedly review, validate, and correct the entire system:
18
- - Membership and identity correctness and completeness
19
- - Consistency across state, permissions, flows, and lifecycle
20
- - Architectural boundaries, modularity, and separation of responsibilities
21
- - UI behavior matching system intent, state, and permissions
22
- - Alignment with modern industry standards and best practices
23
-
24
- No workarounds.
25
- No hacks.
26
- No temporary solutions.
27
- No backward compatibility.
28
- No deprecated logic.
29
- No TODOs.
30
- No dead code.
31
- No unused code.
32
- No incorrect or misleading code.
33
-
34
- Every feature must be built intent-first:
35
- - The correct model must exist before implementation
36
- - No duplicated concepts, parallel truths, or shadow logic
37
- - Any feature must be removable or refactorable without destabilizing the system
38
-
39
- Continuously perform:
40
- - Deduplication
41
- - Refactoring
42
- - Polishing
43
- - Modularity enforcement
44
- - Responsibility separation
45
- - Architectural correction
46
-
47
- The system must remain:
48
- - Stateless
49
- - Serverless-friendly
50
- - Scalable
51
- - Reasonable
52
- - Testable
53
- - Observable
54
-
55
- ## Radix UI (Mandatory)
56
-
57
- If Radix has a primitive for it, you MUST use it. No exceptions. No custom implementations.
58
- Any custom implementation of something Radix already provides is a bug.
59
-
60
- ## Bootstrap
61
-
62
- Admin bootstrap via INITIAL_SUPERADMIN_EMAIL only. One-time, non-reentrant, non-bypassable.
63
-
64
- ## Platform-Led Integrations
65
-
66
- Platform is source of truth. Third-party services sync FROM platform, never reverse.
67
- All configuration in code. No manual third-party dashboard configuration.
68
- Platform can switch providers without architectural change.
69
-
70
- ## Re-authentication
71
-
72
- Sensitive actions require step-up re-authentication (password or email OTP).
73
- Verified session state must be scoped, time-bound, never implicitly reused.
74
-
75
- ## Technologies
76
-
77
- tRPC, Next.js (with Turbopack), Radix UI, next-intl, Drizzle,
78
- Better Auth, Stripe, Upstash, Neon, Vercel,
79
- Resend (email), Vercel Blob (storage),
80
- AI SDK with OpenRouter provider,
81
- Tailwind CSS (styling), @iconify-icon/react (icons),
82
- Bun, Biome, Bun test,
83
- Responsive Web Design.
84
-
85
- ---
86
-
87
- Any ambiguity, inconsistency, incompleteness, or undefined behavior
88
- must be treated as a bug, not a feature.
89
-
90
- The system must withstand repeated review, rejection, refactor, and redesign,
91
- and after every correction,
92
- become simpler, more consistent, and closer to the correct model.
93
-
94
- Ultrathink.
@@ -1,61 +0,0 @@
1
- ---
2
- name: continue2
3
- description: Iterative codebase review - apply each skill guideline to audit and fix the project
4
- ---
5
-
6
- # Continue2: Guideline-Driven Codebase Review
7
-
8
- Use skill guidelines to audit and improve the project codebase.
9
-
10
- **Important**: You are reviewing the PROJECT CODE against the guidelines, NOT reviewing the guidelines themselves.
11
-
12
- ## Process
13
-
14
- ### Phase 1: Sequential Audit
15
-
16
- For each skill guideline:
17
-
18
- 1. Use the Skill tool to load the guideline (e.g., `skill: "auth"`)
19
- 2. Audit the project codebase against that guideline's non-negotiables
20
- 3. Fix any violations found in the project code
21
- 4. Move to next skill
22
-
23
- Skills to audit against (25 total):
24
- - auth, account-security, admin, appsec
25
- - billing, pricing, ledger
26
- - database, data-modeling
27
- - delivery, deployments, observability
28
- - privacy, seo, performance, pwa
29
- - uiux, i18n, growth
30
- - storage, support, referral
31
- - abuse-prevention, competitive-analysis, code-quality
32
-
33
- ### Phase 2: Delegate Full Audit
34
-
35
- After Phase 1, delegate a comprehensive review to a worker agent:
36
-
37
- ```
38
- Task: Audit the project codebase against all 25 skill guidelines.
39
-
40
- For each skill:
41
- 1. Load the guideline using Skill tool (e.g., skill: "auth")
42
- 2. Check if the project code complies with the non-negotiables
43
- 3. Report any violations found
44
-
45
- Return: List of specific violations in the codebase, or "No violations found."
46
- ```
47
-
48
- ### Phase 3: Fix and Repeat
49
-
50
- If reviewer found violations:
51
- 1. Fix all violations in the project code
52
- 2. Return to Phase 2
53
-
54
- If no violations found:
55
- - Done. Commit and release.
56
-
57
- ## Exit Condition
58
-
59
- The loop terminates when:
60
- - A reviewer agent returns "No violations found"
61
- - The project codebase fully complies with all skill guidelines
@@ -1,153 +0,0 @@
1
- ---
2
- name: improve
3
- description: Proactively discover and implement improvements
4
- ---
5
-
6
- # Proactive Improvement
7
-
8
- Analyze project comprehensively. Discover improvement opportunities. Prioritize and execute.
9
-
10
- ## Discovery Areas
11
-
12
- **Code Quality:**
13
- - Code complexity hotspots
14
- - Duplication patterns
15
- - Test coverage gaps
16
- - Error handling weaknesses
17
- - Type safety improvements
18
- - Naming inconsistencies
19
-
20
- **Architecture:**
21
- - Tight coupling
22
- - Missing abstractions
23
- - Scalability bottlenecks
24
- - State management issues
25
- - API design improvements
26
- - Module organization
27
-
28
- **Performance:**
29
- - Slow algorithms (profiling data)
30
- - Database query inefficiencies
31
- - Bundle size optimization
32
- - Memory usage patterns
33
- - Network request optimization
34
- - Caching opportunities
35
-
36
- **Security:**
37
- - Vulnerability scan (dependencies)
38
- - Input validation gaps
39
- - Authentication/authorization weaknesses
40
- - Sensitive data exposure
41
- - OWASP top 10 check
42
- - Security best practices
43
-
44
- **Developer Experience:**
45
- - Development setup complexity
46
- - Build time optimization
47
- - Testing speed
48
- - Debugging capabilities
49
- - Error messages clarity
50
- - Documentation gaps
51
-
52
- **Maintenance:**
53
- - Outdated dependencies
54
- - Deprecated API usage
55
- - Missing tests
56
- - Incomplete documentation
57
- - Configuration complexity
58
- - Technical debt accumulation
59
-
60
- **Features:**
61
- - Missing functionality (user feedback)
62
- - Integration opportunities
63
- - Automation potential
64
- - Monitoring/observability
65
- - Error recovery
66
- - User experience improvements
67
-
68
- ## Analysis Process
69
-
70
- 1. **Scan** codebase comprehensively
71
- 2. **Profile** performance bottlenecks
72
- 3. **Check** security vulnerabilities
73
- 4. **Review** dependencies for updates
74
- 5. **Analyze** test coverage
75
- 6. **Assess** documentation completeness
76
- 7. **Evaluate** architectural patterns
77
- 8. **Identify** missing features
78
-
79
- ## Prioritization Matrix
80
-
81
- **Impact vs Effort:**
82
- - **High Impact + Low Effort** → Do first
83
- - **High Impact + High Effort** → Plan carefully
84
- - **Low Impact + Low Effort** → Quick wins
85
- - **Low Impact + High Effort** → Skip or defer
86
-
87
- **Categories:**
88
- - **Critical:** Security, data loss, crashes
89
- - **High:** Performance degradation, poor UX
90
- - **Medium:** Code quality, maintainability
91
- - **Low:** Nice-to-haves, polish
92
-
93
- ## Execution Plan
94
-
95
- For each improvement:
96
- 1. **Describe** what and why
97
- 2. **Estimate** effort (small/medium/large)
98
- 3. **Assess** impact (low/medium/high)
99
- 4. **Prioritize** using matrix
100
- 5. **Create** implementation plan
101
-
102
- Then execute top priorities:
103
- - Start with high-impact, low-effort
104
- - Make atomic commits
105
- - Test thoroughly
106
- - Document changes
107
-
108
- ## Output Format
109
-
110
- ```markdown
111
- ## Improvement Opportunities
112
-
113
- ### Critical (Do Now)
114
- 1. [Security] Update vulnerable dependency X (CVE-XXXX)
115
- - Impact: High (prevents exploit)
116
- - Effort: Low (5 min)
117
- - Action: `npm update X`
118
-
119
- ### High Priority
120
- 1. [Performance] Optimize user query (N+1 problem)
121
- - Impact: High (10x speedup)
122
- - Effort: Medium (2 hrs)
123
- - Action: Batch queries with JOIN
124
-
125
- ### Quick Wins
126
- 1. [DX] Add pre-commit hooks
127
- - Impact: Medium (catch errors early)
128
- - Effort: Low (30 min)
129
- - Action: Setup husky + lint-staged
130
-
131
- ### Planned Improvements
132
- 1. [Feature] Add caching layer
133
- - Impact: High (reduce server load)
134
- - Effort: High (1 week)
135
- - Action: Design cache strategy, implement Redis
136
-
137
- ## Execution Plan
138
- 1. Fix security vulnerability (now)
139
- 2. Optimize query performance (today)
140
- 3. Add pre-commit hooks (today)
141
- 4. Plan caching implementation (next sprint)
142
- ```
143
-
144
- ## Exit Criteria
145
-
146
- - [ ] Comprehensive analysis completed
147
- - [ ] Opportunities prioritized
148
- - [ ] High-priority improvements implemented
149
- - [ ] Tests pass
150
- - [ ] Impact measured
151
- - [ ] Documentation updated
152
-
153
- Report: Improvements discovered, implemented, impact metrics.
@@ -1,34 +0,0 @@
1
- ---
2
- name: init
3
- description: Initialize project docs - create PRODUCT.md and ARCHITECTURE.md
4
- ---
5
-
6
- # Init Project Docs
7
-
8
- Create project documentation if missing:
9
-
10
- 1. **Check** if `PRODUCT.md` exists in project root
11
- - If missing → Create with structure:
12
- - Vision / Mission
13
- - Success Metrics (revenue, users, growth)
14
- - Target Users
15
- - Value Propositions
16
- - Key Features
17
- - Competitive Landscape
18
- - Roadmap (Now / Next / Later)
19
-
20
- 2. **Check** if `ARCHITECTURE.md` exists in project root
21
- - If missing → Create with structure:
22
- - Tech Stack (with rationale)
23
- - System Design
24
- - Key Patterns
25
- - Data Models
26
- - Integrations
27
- - Technical Decisions
28
- - Known Limitations
29
-
30
- 3. **If files exist**, read them and suggest improvements based on current codebase.
31
-
32
- **Fill in details** based on what you can learn from the codebase. Ask user for what you can't infer.
33
-
34
- Product = WHAT and WHY. Architecture = HOW.
@@ -1,87 +0,0 @@
1
- ---
2
- name: polish
3
- description: Polish project presentation - docs, README, packaging, metadata
4
- ---
5
-
6
- # Polish Project
7
-
8
- Make project professional, welcoming, and well-documented.
9
-
10
- ## Scope
11
-
12
- **README:**
13
- - Clear project description (what, why, how)
14
- - Installation instructions (tested)
15
- - Quick start example (copy-paste ready)
16
- - Key features (3-5 bullet points)
17
- - API overview
18
- - Links to full docs
19
- - Badges (build status, coverage, version, license)
20
- - Contributing guidelines link
21
- - License
22
-
23
- **Documentation:**
24
- - API reference (all public functions)
25
- - Usage examples (common scenarios)
26
- - Tutorials (step-by-step guides)
27
- - Architecture overview
28
- - Troubleshooting guide
29
- - FAQ
30
- - Migration guides (if applicable)
31
-
32
- **Code Comments:**
33
- - JSDoc for public APIs
34
- - Complex logic explained (WHY not WHAT)
35
- - Non-obvious decisions documented
36
- - Examples in comments where helpful
37
-
38
- **Packaging (package.json):**
39
- - Accurate description
40
- - Relevant keywords (10-15)
41
- - Repository URL
42
- - Homepage URL
43
- - Bug tracker URL
44
- - Author info
45
- - License
46
- - Engines specified
47
- - Files field (only ship necessary)
48
-
49
- **GitHub Metadata:**
50
- - Topics/tags (10-20 relevant tags)
51
- - Description (concise, searchable)
52
- - Website URL
53
- - Social preview image (if applicable)
54
-
55
- **Changelog:**
56
- - Update CHANGELOG.md
57
- - Clear version history
58
- - Breaking changes highlighted
59
- - Migration instructions
60
-
61
- **Contributing:**
62
- - CONTRIBUTING.md
63
- - Code of conduct
64
- - Development setup
65
- - Testing guidelines
66
- - PR process
67
-
68
- ## Execution
69
-
70
- 1. **Audit** what exists vs what's missing
71
- 2. **Update** outdated content
72
- 3. **Create** missing documentation
73
- 4. **Test** all code examples
74
- 5. **Verify** all links work
75
- 6. **Ensure** consistency across docs
76
-
77
- ## Quality Checks
78
-
79
- - [ ] README explains project in <5 min read
80
- - [ ] New user can get started in <10 min
81
- - [ ] All examples tested and work
82
- - [ ] No broken links
83
- - [ ] Search-friendly keywords
84
- - [ ] Professional presentation
85
- - [ ] Beginner-friendly
86
-
87
- Report: What was added/updated, coverage improved.
@@ -1,181 +0,0 @@
1
- ---
2
- name: quality
3
- description: Improve test coverage, fix tests, optimize performance, reduce bundle size
4
- ---
5
-
6
- # Quality Assurance
7
-
8
- Maximize quality metrics: tests, coverage, performance, bundle size.
9
-
10
- ## Scope
11
-
12
- **Testing:**
13
- - Fix failing tests
14
- - Add missing tests (.test.ts for all modules)
15
- - Improve coverage (critical paths 100%, business logic 80%+)
16
- - Test edge cases
17
- - Test error paths
18
- - Integration tests
19
- - E2E tests (if applicable)
20
-
21
- **Benchmarking:**
22
- - Add benchmarks (.bench.ts for critical functions)
23
- - Measure performance
24
- - Identify regressions
25
- - Optimize slow operations
26
-
27
- **Performance:**
28
- - Profile hot paths
29
- - Optimize algorithms (reduce complexity)
30
- - Fix memory leaks
31
- - Reduce allocations
32
- - Cache expensive operations
33
- - Lazy load where possible
34
-
35
- **Bundle Size:**
36
- - Analyze bundle composition
37
- - Remove unused dependencies
38
- - Tree-shake effectively
39
- - Code split strategically
40
- - Compress assets
41
- - Use dynamic imports
42
-
43
- **Code Quality:**
44
- - Fix lint errors/warnings
45
- - Improve type safety (no `any`)
46
- - Reduce complexity
47
- - Improve maintainability
48
- - Follow code standards
49
-
50
- **Security:**
51
- - Fix vulnerabilities
52
- - Update dependencies
53
- - Validate inputs
54
- - Sanitize outputs
55
- - Secure defaults
56
-
57
- ## Execution
58
-
59
- ### 1. Test Coverage
60
-
61
- ```bash
62
- # Run tests with coverage
63
- npm run test:coverage
64
-
65
- # Identify gaps
66
- # Add tests for uncovered code
67
- # Focus on critical paths first
68
- ```
69
-
70
- **Priority:**
71
- - Critical business logic (100%)
72
- - Error handling (100%)
73
- - Edge cases (90%)
74
- - Happy paths (100%)
75
- - Integration points (80%)
76
-
77
- ### 2. Benchmarking
78
-
79
- ```bash
80
- # Run benchmarks
81
- npm run bench
82
-
83
- # Compare against baseline
84
- # Identify regressions
85
- # Optimize bottlenecks
86
- ```
87
-
88
- **Add benchmarks for:**
89
- - Algorithm complexity (O(n) vs O(n²))
90
- - Database queries
91
- - API calls
92
- - Data processing
93
- - Rendering (if UI)
94
-
95
- ### 3. Performance Profiling
96
-
97
- ```bash
98
- # Profile application
99
- node --inspect ...
100
- # Or use Clinic.js, 0x, etc.
101
-
102
- # Identify bottlenecks
103
- # Optimize hot paths
104
- # Measure improvements
105
- ```
106
-
107
- **Check:**
108
- - CPU usage
109
- - Memory usage
110
- - I/O operations
111
- - Network calls
112
- - Rendering time
113
-
114
- ### 4. Bundle Analysis
115
-
116
- ```bash
117
- # Analyze bundle
118
- npm run build -- --analyze
119
-
120
- # Check size
121
- ls -lh dist/
122
-
123
- # Identify large dependencies
124
- # Remove unnecessary code
125
- ```
126
-
127
- **Optimize:**
128
- - Remove unused dependencies
129
- - Use smaller alternatives
130
- - Dynamic imports for large modules
131
- - Tree-shake effectively
132
- - Minify properly
133
-
134
- ### 5. Quality Metrics
135
-
136
- **Track:**
137
- - Test coverage: `npm run test:coverage`
138
- - Bundle size: `ls -lh dist/`
139
- - Performance: `npm run bench`
140
- - Security: `npm audit`
141
- - Type coverage: TypeScript strict mode
142
- - Lint score: `npm run lint`
143
-
144
- ## Targets
145
-
146
- **Tests:**
147
- - Coverage: ≥80% (business logic ≥90%)
148
- - All critical paths: 100%
149
- - Build time: <30s
150
- - Test time: <10s
151
-
152
- **Performance:**
153
- - Page load: <3s
154
- - API response: <200ms
155
- - Time to interactive: <5s
156
- - Bundle size: <100KB (gzipped)
157
-
158
- **Quality:**
159
- - Zero lint errors
160
- - Zero `any` types (unless justified)
161
- - Zero security vulnerabilities (high/critical)
162
- - Complexity score: <10 per function
163
-
164
- ## Commit Strategy
165
-
166
- Atomic commits per improvement:
167
- - `test(auth): add tests for token validation`
168
- - `perf(db): optimize user query with batch loading`
169
- - `build: reduce bundle size by 40% with code splitting`
170
-
171
- ## Exit Criteria
172
-
173
- - [ ] All tests pass
174
- - [ ] Coverage meets targets
175
- - [ ] Benchmarks added for critical functions
176
- - [ ] Performance optimized
177
- - [ ] Bundle size reduced
178
- - [ ] No security vulnerabilities
179
- - [ ] Quality metrics improved
180
-
181
- Report: Coverage %, bundle size reduction, performance gains, benchmarks added.
@@ -1,103 +0,0 @@
1
- ---
2
- name: release
3
- description: Publish new version and monitor release process
4
- ---
5
-
6
- # Release & Publish
7
-
8
- Prepare, publish, and monitor package release.
9
-
10
- ## Pre-Release Checks
11
-
12
- **Quality Gates:**
13
- - [ ] All tests pass
14
- - [ ] No lint errors
15
- - [ ] Build successful
16
- - [ ] No security vulnerabilities
17
- - [ ] Dependencies up to date
18
- - [ ] CHANGELOG updated
19
- - [ ] README accurate
20
- - [ ] Breaking changes documented
21
-
22
- **Version Decision:**
23
- - Breaking changes → `major`
24
- - New features → `minor` (default)
25
- - Bug fixes → `patch`
26
-
27
- ## Release Process
28
-
29
- ### For TypeScript/JavaScript Projects
30
-
31
- 1. **Create Changeset:**
32
- ```bash
33
- bunx changeset
34
- ```
35
- - Select package
36
- - Choose version bump type
37
- - Write clear summary
38
-
39
- 2. **Version Bump:**
40
- ```bash
41
- bunx changeset version
42
- ```
43
- - Updates package.json
44
- - Updates CHANGELOG.md
45
- - Consumes changeset
46
-
47
- 3. **Commit & Push:**
48
- ```bash
49
- git add -A
50
- git commit -m "chore(release): <package>@<version>"
51
- git push
52
- ```
53
-
54
- 4. **Monitor CI:**
55
- ```bash
56
- gh run list --workflow=release --limit 5
57
- gh run watch <run-id>
58
- ```
59
-
60
- 5. **Verify Publication:**
61
- ```bash
62
- npm view <package>@<version>
63
- ```
64
-
65
- ### For Other Projects
66
-
67
- 1. Update version in manifest (package.json, setup.py, etc.)
68
- 2. Update CHANGELOG
69
- 3. Create git tag
70
- 4. Push tag to trigger release
71
- 5. Monitor CI/CD
72
-
73
- ## Post-Release
74
-
75
- - [ ] Verify package published
76
- - [ ] Test installation: `npm install <package>@latest`
77
- - [ ] Create GitHub release with notes
78
- - [ ] Announce (if public package)
79
- - [ ] Close related issues/PRs
80
-
81
- ## Troubleshooting
82
-
83
- **CI fails on install:**
84
- - Update lockfile locally: `bun install`
85
- - Commit and push
86
-
87
- **Tests fail in CI:**
88
- - Run tests locally: `npm test`
89
- - Fix issues, commit, push
90
-
91
- **Build fails:**
92
- - Check build locally: `npm run build`
93
- - Fix errors, commit, push
94
-
95
- ## Exit Criteria
96
-
97
- - [ ] Package published successfully
98
- - [ ] CI workflow completed
99
- - [ ] GitHub release created
100
- - [ ] Version verified on registry
101
- - [ ] Installation tested
102
-
103
- Report: Version number, publish time, registry URL.