@sylphx/flow 2.29.0 → 2.29.2

This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
package/CHANGELOG.md CHANGED
@@ -1,5 +1,21 @@
1
1
  # @sylphx/flow
2
2
 
3
+ ## 2.29.2 (2026-01-08)
4
+
5
+ Clarify /continue2 audits project code against guidelines, not the guidelines themselves
6
+
7
+ ### 📚 Documentation
8
+
9
+ - clarify /continue2 audits PROJECT CODE against guidelines, not the guidelines themselves ([2c3adfa](https://github.com/SylphxAI/flow/commit/2c3adfa79e5d00e4d8fe42e2e23de126ca77b31a))
10
+
11
+ ## 2.29.1 (2026-01-08)
12
+
13
+ Use Skill tool instead of hardcoded paths in /continue2
14
+
15
+ ### 📚 Documentation
16
+
17
+ - use Skill tool instead of hardcoded paths in /continue2 ([0c2289d](https://github.com/SylphxAI/flow/commit/0c2289d0e821677b7d7c0f088b41b58ead341635))
18
+
3
19
  ## 2.29.0 (2026-01-07)
4
20
 
5
21
  Add /continue2 slash command; clarify skill boundaries; remove hardcoded Radix list
@@ -1,88 +1,61 @@
1
1
  ---
2
2
  name: continue2
3
- description: Iterative guideline review - review each, delegate critique, repeat until perfect
3
+ description: Iterative codebase review - apply each skill guideline to audit and fix the project
4
4
  ---
5
5
 
6
- # Continue2: Iterative Guideline Review
6
+ # Continue2: Guideline-Driven Codebase Review
7
7
 
8
- Review all skill guidelines until perfection.
8
+ Use skill guidelines to audit and improve the project codebase.
9
+
10
+ **Important**: You are reviewing the PROJECT CODE against the guidelines, NOT reviewing the guidelines themselves.
9
11
 
10
12
  ## Process
11
13
 
12
- ### Phase 1: Sequential Review
14
+ ### Phase 1: Sequential Audit
13
15
 
14
- Review each skill guideline one by one:
16
+ For each skill guideline:
15
17
 
16
- 1. Read the skill file
17
- 2. Evaluate against criteria (below)
18
- 3. Fix any issues found
18
+ 1. Use the Skill tool to load the guideline (e.g., `skill: "auth"`)
19
+ 2. Audit the project codebase against that guideline's non-negotiables
20
+ 3. Fix any violations found in the project code
19
21
  4. Move to next skill
20
22
 
21
- Skills to review (in order):
22
- - auth, account-security
23
+ Skills to audit against (25 total):
24
+ - auth, account-security, admin, appsec
23
25
  - billing, pricing, ledger
24
- - admin, appsec
25
26
  - database, data-modeling
26
- - delivery, deployments
27
- - observability, privacy
28
- - seo, performance, pwa
27
+ - delivery, deployments, observability
28
+ - privacy, seo, performance, pwa
29
29
  - uiux, i18n, growth
30
30
  - storage, support, referral
31
31
  - abuse-prevention, competitive-analysis, code-quality
32
32
 
33
- ### Phase 2: Delegate to Reviewer
33
+ ### Phase 2: Delegate Full Audit
34
34
 
35
- After completing Phase 1, delegate a full review to a worker agent:
35
+ After Phase 1, delegate a comprehensive review to a worker agent:
36
36
 
37
37
  ```
38
- Task: Review all 25 skill guidelines for issues.
38
+ Task: Audit the project codebase against all 25 skill guidelines.
39
39
 
40
- Check for:
41
- - Overlapping responsibilities between skills
42
- - Missing cross-references where skills relate
43
- - Inconsistent formatting or structure
44
- - Missing SSOT designations where needed
45
- - Tutorial-style content (HOW) instead of requirements (WHAT)
46
- - Vague or unverifiable non-negotiables
40
+ For each skill:
41
+ 1. Load the guideline using Skill tool (e.g., skill: "auth")
42
+ 2. Check if the project code complies with the non-negotiables
43
+ 3. Report any violations found
47
44
 
48
- Return: List of specific issues found, or "No issues found."
45
+ Return: List of specific violations in the codebase, or "No violations found."
49
46
  ```
50
47
 
51
48
  ### Phase 3: Fix and Repeat
52
49
 
53
- If reviewer found issues:
54
- 1. Fix all reported issues
50
+ If reviewer found violations:
51
+ 1. Fix all violations in the project code
55
52
  2. Return to Phase 2
56
53
 
57
- If reviewer found no issues:
54
+ If no violations found:
58
55
  - Done. Commit and release.
59
56
 
60
- ## Evaluation Criteria
61
-
62
- Each skill must have:
63
-
64
- **Structure**:
65
- - YAML frontmatter (name, description)
66
- - Tech Stack section (if applicable)
67
- - Non-Negotiables section
68
- - Context section (with cross-references to related skills)
69
- - Driving Questions section
70
-
71
- **Content Quality**:
72
- - Requirements state WHAT, not HOW
73
- - Non-negotiables are verifiable (can be checked)
74
- - Context clarifies boundaries with related skills
75
- - No code examples or templates
76
- - No tutorial-style explanations
77
-
78
- **Consistency**:
79
- - Tech stack entries follow pattern: `* **Component**: Technology`
80
- - Next.js always includes `(with Turbopack)`
81
- - Cross-references use backtick format: `lives in \`skill-name\``
82
- - SSOT is designated where concepts overlap
83
-
84
57
  ## Exit Condition
85
58
 
86
59
  The loop terminates when:
87
- - A reviewer agent returns "No issues found"
88
- - Or explicitly: no overlaps, no missing cross-refs, no formatting issues, no HOW content
60
+ - A reviewer agent returns "No violations found"
61
+ - The project codebase fully complies with all skill guidelines
package/package.json CHANGED
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
1
1
  {
2
2
  "name": "@sylphx/flow",
3
- "version": "2.29.0",
3
+ "version": "2.29.2",
4
4
  "description": "One CLI to rule them all. Unified orchestration layer for AI coding assistants. Auto-detection, auto-installation, auto-upgrade.",
5
5
  "type": "module",
6
6
  "bin": {