@sylphx/flow 2.15.3 → 2.16.1

package/CHANGELOG.md

@@ -1,5 +1,23 @@
 # @sylphx/flow
 
+## 2.16.1 (2025-12-17)
+
+### ♻️ Refactoring
+
+- **commands:** simplify /continue and /review - think, don't checklist ([754eec1](https://github.com/SylphxAI/flow/commit/754eec1211719fc68f25ce47510e5797a33e1469))
+
+## 2.16.0 (2025-12-17)
+
+### ✨ Features
+
+- **commands:** add closed-loop to /continue ([dca7b76](https://github.com/SylphxAI/flow/commit/dca7b7612c65febef242549ad965289a189ce5e4))
+- **commands:** enhance /continue with role-based simulation ([ca3ebfe](https://github.com/SylphxAI/flow/commit/ca3ebfe06a73f3db722ff8f88c353202067e18f6))
+- **commands:** add /continue slash command for finishing incomplete work ([16c8aaf](https://github.com/SylphxAI/flow/commit/16c8aaf22337713c39395e4465d5bcdf1bfaafd9))
+
+### ♻️ Refactoring
+
+- **commands:** split review into mandate + guidelines ([16754bc](https://github.com/SylphxAI/flow/commit/16754bc7403d13dd329b2097c3c8f25e360a7c59))
+
 ## 2.15.3 (2025-12-17)
 
 ### ⚡️ Performance

package/assets/slash-commands/continue.md

@@ -0,0 +1,98 @@
+---
+name: continue
+description: Continue incomplete work - find gaps, finish features, fix what's broken
+agent: coder
+---
+
+# Continue
+
+Find what's incomplete. Finish it.
+
+## Mandate
+
+* **Think, don't checklist.** Understand the project first. What is it trying to do? What would "done" look like?
+* **Delegate workers** for parallel research. You synthesize and verify.
+* **Fix, don't report.** Implement solutions directly.
+* **One pass.** No deferrals. Complete each fix fully.
+
+## How to Find Incomplete Work
+
+Don't grep for TODO and call it done. Incomplete work hides in:
+
+**What's explicitly unfinished** — Yes, scan for TODO/FIXME/HACK. But ask: why are they there? What was the person avoiding?
+
+**What's implicitly broken** — Code that "works" but:
+- Fails silently (empty catch blocks, swallowed errors)
+- Works only in happy path (no validation, no edge cases)
+- Works but confuses users (unclear errors, missing feedback)
+- Works but can't be debugged (no logs, no context)
+
+**What's missing entirely** — Features referenced but not implemented. UI that leads nowhere. Promises in docs that code doesn't deliver.
+
+## The Real Test
+
+For each part of the system, ask:
+
+> "If I were a user trying to accomplish their goal, where would I get stuck?"
+
+> "If this broke at 3am, could someone figure out why?"
+
+> "If requirements changed tomorrow, what would be painful to modify?"
+
+> "If we had 100x traffic, what would fall over first?"
+
+These questions reveal incompleteness that checklists miss.
+
+## Execution
+
+1. **Understand the project** — Read README, main entry points, core flows. What is this thing supposed to do?
+
+2. **Walk the critical paths** — Trace actual user journeys through code. Where does the path get uncertain, error-prone, or incomplete?
+
+3. **Find the gaps** — Not just TODOs, but:
+   - Dead ends (code that starts something but doesn't finish)
+   - Weak spots (minimal implementation that will break under pressure)
+   - Missing pieces (what's referenced but doesn't exist)
+
+4. **Prioritize by impact** — What blocks users? What causes data loss? What makes debugging impossible? Fix those first.
+
+5. **Fix completely** — Don't patch. Understand root cause. Implement proper solution. Test it works.
+
+## When to Go Deeper
+
+If issues cluster in a domain, invoke `/review <domain>` for thorough analysis:
+
+```
+/review auth        — Auth flow issues
+/review security    — Validation gaps, injection risks
+/review database    — Schema issues, missing indexes
+/review performance — Slow paths, bundle bloat
+```
+
+Full list: auth, account-security, privacy, billing, pricing, ledger, security, trust-safety, uiux, seo, pwa, performance, i18n, database, data-architecture, storage, observability, operability, delivery, growth, referral, support, admin, discovery, code-quality
+
+## Loop
+
+After fixing, ask: "Did my fixes introduce new gaps? Did fixing X reveal Y was also broken?"
+
+If yes → continue. If no Critical/High issues remain → done.
+
+## Output
+
+```
+## What I Found
+
+[Describe the gaps discovered — not a checklist, but an understanding of what's incomplete and why]
+
+## What I Fixed
+
+- [Description of fix and why it matters]
+
+## What Remains
+
+- [Issues that need human decision or are blocked]
+
+## Next
+
+[/continue again | /review <domain> | done]
+```

package/assets/slash-commands/{review-account-security.md → guideline-account-security.md}

@@ -1,18 +1,10 @@
 ---
-name: review-account-security
-description: Review account security - sessions, MFA, devices, security events
+name: guideline-account-security
+description: Guideline: account security - sessions, MFA, devices, security events
 agent: coder
 ---
 
-# Account Security Review
-
-## Mandate
-
-* Perform a **deep, thorough review** of account security in this codebase.
-* **Delegate to multiple workers** to research different aspects in parallel; you act as the **final gate** to synthesize and verify quality.
-* **Review then Act**: identify issues, then **implement fixes directly**. Don't just report — fix.
-* **Single-pass delivery**: no deferrals; deliver complete implementation.
-* **Explore beyond the spec**: identify threats users can't protect themselves from.
+# Account Security Guideline
 
 ## Tech Stack
 

package/assets/slash-commands/{review-admin.md → guideline-admin.md}

@@ -1,18 +1,10 @@
 ---
-name: review-admin
-description: Review admin - RBAC, bootstrap, audit, operational tools
+name: guideline-admin
+description: Guideline: admin - RBAC, bootstrap, audit, operational tools
 agent: coder
 ---
 
-# Admin Platform Review
-
-## Mandate
-
-* Perform a **deep, thorough review** of the admin platform in this codebase.
-* **Delegate to multiple workers** to research different aspects in parallel; you act as the **final gate** to synthesize and verify quality.
-* **Review then Act**: identify issues, then **implement fixes directly**. Don't just report — fix.
-* **Single-pass delivery**: no deferrals; deliver complete implementation.
-* **Explore beyond the spec**: identify operational gaps and safety improvements.
+# Admin Guideline
 
 ## Tech Stack
 

package/assets/slash-commands/{review-auth.md → guideline-auth.md}

@@ -1,18 +1,10 @@
 ---
-name: review-auth
-description: Review authentication - sign-in, SSO, passkeys, verification
+name: guideline-auth
+description: Guideline: authentication - sign-in, SSO, passkeys, verification
 agent: coder
 ---
 
-# Authentication Review
-
-## Mandate
-
-* Perform a **deep, thorough review** of authentication in this codebase.
-* **Delegate to multiple workers** to research different aspects in parallel; you act as the **final gate** to synthesize and verify quality.
-* **Review then Act**: identify issues, then **implement fixes directly**. Don't just report — fix.
-* **Single-pass delivery**: no deferrals; deliver complete implementation.
-* **Explore beyond the spec**: identify security gaps and UX friction in auth flows.
+# Auth Guideline
 
 ## Tech Stack
 

package/assets/slash-commands/{review-billing.md → guideline-billing.md}

@@ -1,18 +1,10 @@
 ---
-name: review-billing
-description: Review billing - Stripe integration, webhooks, subscription state
+name: guideline-billing
+description: Guideline: billing - Stripe integration, webhooks, subscription state
 agent: coder
 ---
 
-# Billing Review
-
-## Mandate
-
-* Perform a **deep, thorough review** of billing and payments in this codebase.
-* **Delegate to multiple workers** to research different aspects in parallel; you act as the **final gate** to synthesize and verify quality.
-* **Review then Act**: identify issues, then **implement fixes directly**. Don't just report — fix.
-* **Single-pass delivery**: no deferrals; deliver complete implementation.
-* **Explore beyond the spec**: identify revenue leakage and reliability improvements.
+# Billing Guideline
 
 ## Tech Stack
 

package/assets/slash-commands/{review-code-quality.md → guideline-code-quality.md}

@@ -1,18 +1,10 @@
 ---
-name: review-code-quality
-description: Review code quality - architecture, types, testing, maintainability
+name: guideline-code-quality
+description: Guideline: code quality - architecture, types, testing, maintainability
 agent: coder
 ---
 
-# Code Quality Review
-
-## Mandate
-
-* Perform a **deep, thorough review** of code quality in this codebase.
-* **Delegate to multiple workers** to research different aspects in parallel; you act as the **final gate** to synthesize and verify quality.
-* **Review then Act**: identify issues, then **implement fixes directly**. Don't just report — fix.
-* **Single-pass delivery**: no deferrals; deliver complete implementation.
-* **Explore beyond the spec**: identify code that works but shouldn't exist in its current form.
+# Code Quality Guideline
 
 ## Tech Stack
 

package/assets/slash-commands/{review-data-architecture.md → guideline-data-architecture.md}

@@ -1,18 +1,10 @@
 ---
-name: review-data-architecture
-description: Review data architecture - boundaries, consistency, state machines
+name: guideline-data-architecture
+description: Guideline: data architecture - boundaries, consistency, state machines
 agent: coder
 ---
 
-# Data Architecture Review
-
-## Mandate
-
-* Perform a **deep, thorough review** of data architecture in this codebase.
-* **Delegate to multiple workers** to research different aspects in parallel; you act as the **final gate** to synthesize and verify quality.
-* **Review then Act**: identify issues, then **implement fixes directly**. Don't just report — fix.
-* **Single-pass delivery**: no deferrals; deliver complete implementation.
-* **Explore beyond the spec**: identify architectural weaknesses that will cause problems at scale.
+# Data Architecture Guideline
 
 ## Tech Stack
 

package/assets/slash-commands/{review-database.md → guideline-database.md}

@@ -1,18 +1,10 @@
 ---
-name: review-database
-description: Review database - schema, migrations, performance, reliability
+name: guideline-database
+description: Guideline: database - schema, migrations, performance, reliability
 agent: coder
 ---
 
-# Database Review
-
-## Mandate
-
-* Perform a **deep, thorough review** of the database in this codebase.
-* **Delegate to multiple workers** to research different aspects in parallel; you act as the **final gate** to synthesize and verify quality.
-* **Review then Act**: identify issues, then **implement fixes directly**. Don't just report — fix.
-* **Single-pass delivery**: no deferrals; deliver complete implementation.
-* **Explore beyond the spec**: identify schema problems that will hurt at scale.
+# Database Guideline
 
 ## Tech Stack
 

package/assets/slash-commands/{review-delivery.md → guideline-delivery.md}

@@ -1,18 +1,10 @@
 ---
-name: review-delivery
-description: Review delivery - CI gates, automated verification, release safety
+name: guideline-delivery
+description: Guideline: delivery - CI gates, automated verification, release safety
 agent: coder
 ---
 
-# Delivery Review
-
-## Mandate
-
-* Perform a **deep, thorough review** of delivery gates in this codebase.
-* **Delegate to multiple workers** to research different aspects in parallel; you act as the **final gate** to synthesize and verify quality.
-* **Review then Act**: identify issues, then **implement fixes directly**. Don't just report — fix.
-* **Single-pass delivery**: no deferrals; deliver complete implementation.
-* **Explore beyond the spec**: identify what could go wrong in production that we're not catching.
+# Delivery Guideline
 
 ## Tech Stack
 

package/assets/slash-commands/{review-discovery.md → guideline-discovery.md}

@@ -1,18 +1,10 @@
 ---
-name: review-discovery
-description: Review discovery - competitive research, opportunities, market positioning
+name: guideline-discovery
+description: Guideline: discovery - competitive research, opportunities, market positioning
 agent: coder
 ---
 
-# Discovery Review
-
-## Mandate
-
-* Perform a **deep, thorough review** to discover opportunities for this product.
-* **Delegate to multiple workers** to research different aspects in parallel; you act as the **final gate** to synthesize and verify quality.
-* **Review then Act**: identify opportunities, then **implement improvements directly**. Don't just report — build.
-* **Single-pass delivery**: no deferrals; deliver complete implementation.
-* **This review IS exploration** — think broadly and creatively about what could be.
+# Discovery Guideline
 
 ## Tech Stack
 

package/assets/slash-commands/{review-growth.md → guideline-growth.md}

@@ -1,18 +1,10 @@
 ---
-name: review-growth
-description: Review growth - activation, retention, virality
+name: guideline-growth
+description: Guideline: growth - activation, retention, virality
 agent: coder
 ---
 
-# Growth Review
-
-## Mandate
-
-* Perform a **deep, thorough review** of growth systems in this codebase.
-* **Delegate to multiple workers** to research different aspects in parallel; you act as the **final gate** to synthesize and verify quality.
-* **Review then Act**: identify issues, then **implement fixes directly**. Don't just report — fix.
-* **Single-pass delivery**: no deferrals; deliver complete implementation.
-* **Explore beyond the spec**: identify growth opportunities that don't yet exist.
+# Growth Guideline
 
 ## Tech Stack
 

package/assets/slash-commands/{review-i18n.md → guideline-i18n.md}

@@ -1,18 +1,10 @@
 ---
-name: review-i18n
-description: Review i18n - localization, routing, translation quality
+name: guideline-i18n
+description: Guideline: i18n - localization, routing, translation quality
 agent: coder
 ---
 
-# Internationalization Review
-
-## Mandate
-
-* Perform a **deep, thorough review** of internationalization in this codebase.
-* **Delegate to multiple workers** to research different aspects in parallel; you act as the **final gate** to synthesize and verify quality.
-* **Review then Act**: identify issues, then **implement fixes directly**. Don't just report — fix.
-* **Single-pass delivery**: no deferrals; deliver complete implementation.
-* **Explore beyond the spec**: identify what would make the product feel native to each locale.
+# i18n Guideline
 
 ## Tech Stack
 

package/assets/slash-commands/{review-ledger.md → guideline-ledger.md}

@@ -1,18 +1,10 @@
 ---
-name: review-ledger
-description: Review ledger - balance systems, financial integrity, reconciliation
+name: guideline-ledger
+description: Guideline: ledger - balance systems, financial integrity, reconciliation
 agent: coder
 ---
 
-# Ledger Review
-
-## Mandate
-
-* Perform a **deep, thorough review** of any balance/credits/wallet system in this codebase.
-* **Delegate to multiple workers** to research different aspects in parallel; you act as the **final gate** to synthesize and verify quality.
-* **Review then Act**: identify issues, then **implement fixes directly**. Don't just report — fix.
-* **Single-pass delivery**: no deferrals; deliver complete implementation.
-* **Explore beyond the spec**: identify financial integrity risks before they become real problems.
+# Ledger Guideline
 
 ## Tech Stack
 

package/assets/slash-commands/{review-observability.md → guideline-observability.md}

@@ -1,18 +1,10 @@
 ---
-name: review-observability
-description: Review observability - logging, tracing, alerting, debugging
+name: guideline-observability
+description: Guideline: observability - logging, tracing, alerting, debugging
 agent: coder
 ---
 
-# Observability Review
-
-## Mandate
-
-* Perform a **deep, thorough review** of observability in this codebase.
-* **Delegate to multiple workers** to research different aspects in parallel; you act as the **final gate** to synthesize and verify quality.
-* **Review then Act**: identify issues, then **implement fixes directly**. Don't just report — fix.
-* **Single-pass delivery**: no deferrals; deliver complete implementation.
-* **Explore beyond the spec**: identify the production issues we can't debug today.
+# Observability Guideline
 
 ## Tech Stack
 

package/assets/slash-commands/{review-operability.md → guideline-operability.md}

@@ -1,18 +1,10 @@
 ---
-name: review-operability
-description: Review operability - workflows, retries, DLQ, incident response
+name: guideline-operability
+description: Guideline: operability - workflows, retries, DLQ, incident response
 agent: coder
 ---
 
-# Operability Review
-
-## Mandate
-
-* Perform a **deep, thorough review** of operability in this codebase.
-* **Delegate to multiple workers** to research different aspects in parallel; you act as the **final gate** to synthesize and verify quality.
-* **Review then Act**: identify issues, then **implement fixes directly**. Don't just report — fix.
-* **Single-pass delivery**: no deferrals; deliver complete implementation.
-* **Explore beyond the spec**: identify what will break at 3am and how we'd fix it.
+# Operability Guideline
 
 ## Tech Stack
 

package/assets/slash-commands/{review-performance.md → guideline-performance.md}

@@ -1,18 +1,10 @@
 ---
-name: review-performance
-description: Review performance - speed, Core Web Vitals, bottlenecks
+name: guideline-performance
+description: Guideline: performance - speed, Core Web Vitals, bottlenecks
 agent: coder
 ---
 
-# Performance Review
-
-## Mandate
-
-* Perform a **deep, thorough review** of performance in this codebase.
-* **Delegate to multiple workers** to research different aspects in parallel; you act as the **final gate** to synthesize and verify quality.
-* **Review then Act**: identify issues, then **implement fixes directly**. Don't just report — fix.
-* **Single-pass delivery**: no deferrals; deliver complete implementation.
-* **Explore beyond the spec**: identify what's making the product feel slow.
+# Performance Guideline
 
 ## Tech Stack
 

package/assets/slash-commands/{review-pricing.md → guideline-pricing.md}

@@ -1,18 +1,10 @@
 ---
-name: review-pricing
-description: Review pricing - strategy, packaging, monetization
+name: guideline-pricing
+description: Guideline: pricing - strategy, packaging, monetization
 agent: coder
 ---
 
-# Pricing Review
-
-## Mandate
-
-* Perform a **deep, thorough review** of pricing in this codebase.
-* **Delegate to multiple workers** to research different aspects in parallel; you act as the **final gate** to synthesize and verify quality.
-* **Review then Act**: identify issues, then **implement fixes directly**. Don't just report — fix.
-* **Single-pass delivery**: no deferrals; deliver complete implementation.
-* **Explore beyond the spec**: identify monetization opportunities and pricing friction.
+# Pricing Guideline
 
 ## Tech Stack
 

package/assets/slash-commands/{review-privacy.md → guideline-privacy.md}

@@ -1,18 +1,10 @@
 ---
-name: review-privacy
-description: Review privacy - consent, PII, data lifecycle, compliance
+name: guideline-privacy
+description: Guideline: privacy - consent, PII, data lifecycle, compliance
 agent: coder
 ---
 
-# Privacy Review
-
-## Mandate
-
-* Perform a **deep, thorough review** of privacy controls in this codebase.
-* **Delegate to multiple workers** to research different aspects in parallel; you act as the **final gate** to synthesize and verify quality.
-* **Review then Act**: identify issues, then **implement fixes directly**. Don't just report — fix.
-* **Single-pass delivery**: no deferrals; deliver complete implementation.
-* **Explore beyond the spec**: identify compliance gaps and privacy improvements.
+# Privacy Guideline
 
 ## Tech Stack
 

package/assets/slash-commands/{review-pwa.md → guideline-pwa.md}

@@ -1,18 +1,10 @@
 ---
-name: review-pwa
-description: Review PWA - offline experience, installation, engagement
+name: guideline-pwa
+description: Guideline: PWA - offline experience, installation, engagement
 agent: coder
 ---
 
-# PWA Review
-
-## Mandate
-
-* Perform a **deep, thorough review** of PWA implementation in this codebase.
-* **Delegate to multiple workers** to research different aspects in parallel; you act as the **final gate** to synthesize and verify quality.
-* **Review then Act**: identify issues, then **implement fixes directly**. Don't just report — fix.
-* **Single-pass delivery**: no deferrals; deliver complete implementation.
-* **Explore beyond the spec**: identify what would make the web experience feel native.
+# PWA Guideline
 
 ## Tech Stack
 

package/assets/slash-commands/{review-referral.md → guideline-referral.md}

@@ -1,18 +1,10 @@
 ---
-name: review-referral
-description: Review referral - attribution, rewards, fraud prevention
+name: guideline-referral
+description: Guideline: referral - attribution, rewards, fraud prevention
 agent: coder
 ---
 
-# Referral Review
-
-## Mandate
-
-* Perform a **deep, thorough review** of the referral system in this codebase.
-* **Delegate to multiple workers** to research different aspects in parallel; you act as the **final gate** to synthesize and verify quality.
-* **Review then Act**: identify issues, then **implement fixes directly**. Don't just report — fix.
-* **Single-pass delivery**: no deferrals; deliver complete implementation.
-* **Explore beyond the spec**: identify growth opportunities and fraud vectors.
+# Referral Guideline
 
 ## Tech Stack
 

package/assets/slash-commands/{review-security.md → guideline-security.md}

@@ -1,18 +1,10 @@
 ---
-name: review-security
-description: Review security - OWASP, headers, authentication, secrets
+name: guideline-security
+description: Guideline: security - OWASP, headers, authentication, secrets
 agent: coder
 ---
 
-# Security Review
-
-## Mandate
-
-* Perform a **deep, thorough review** of security in this codebase.
-* **Delegate to multiple workers** to research different aspects in parallel; you act as the **final gate** to synthesize and verify quality.
-* **Review then Act**: identify issues, then **implement fixes directly**. Don't just report — fix.
-* **Single-pass delivery**: no deferrals; deliver complete implementation.
-* **Explore beyond the spec**: identify vulnerabilities and hardening opportunities not listed here.
+# Security Guideline
 
 ## Tech Stack
 

package/assets/slash-commands/{review-seo.md → guideline-seo.md}

@@ -1,18 +1,10 @@
 ---
-name: review-seo
-description: Review SEO - discoverability, metadata, search rankings
+name: guideline-seo
+description: Guideline: SEO - discoverability, metadata, search rankings
 agent: coder
 ---
 
-# SEO Review
-
-## Mandate
-
-* Perform a **deep, thorough review** of SEO in this codebase.
-* **Delegate to multiple workers** to research different aspects in parallel; you act as the **final gate** to synthesize and verify quality.
-* **Review then Act**: identify issues, then **implement fixes directly**. Don't just report — fix.
-* **Single-pass delivery**: no deferrals; deliver complete implementation.
-* **Explore beyond the spec**: identify what would make this product dominate search results.
+# SEO Guideline
 
 ## Tech Stack
 

package/assets/slash-commands/{review-storage.md → guideline-storage.md}

@@ -1,18 +1,10 @@
 ---
-name: review-storage
-description: Review storage - uploads, file handling, security
+name: guideline-storage
+description: Guideline: storage - uploads, file handling, security
 agent: coder
 ---
 
-# Storage Review
-
-## Mandate
-
-* Perform a **deep, thorough review** of file storage and uploads in this codebase.
-* **Delegate to multiple workers** to research different aspects in parallel; you act as the **final gate** to synthesize and verify quality.
-* **Review then Act**: identify issues, then **implement fixes directly**. Don't just report — fix.
-* **Single-pass delivery**: no deferrals; deliver complete implementation.
-* **Explore beyond the spec**: identify security risks and cost optimization opportunities.
+# Storage Guideline
 
 ## Tech Stack
 

package/assets/slash-commands/{review-support.md → guideline-support.md}

@@ -1,18 +1,10 @@
 ---
-name: review-support
-description: Review support - help experience, communications, user satisfaction
+name: guideline-support
+description: Guideline: support - help experience, communications, user satisfaction
 agent: coder
 ---
 
-# Support Review
-
-## Mandate
-
-* Perform a **deep, thorough review** of support and communications in this codebase.
-* **Delegate to multiple workers** to research different aspects in parallel; you act as the **final gate** to synthesize and verify quality.
-* **Review then Act**: identify issues, then **implement fixes directly**. Don't just report — fix.
-* **Single-pass delivery**: no deferrals; deliver complete implementation.
-* **Explore beyond the spec**: identify what would make users feel genuinely supported.
+# Support Guideline
 
 ## Tech Stack
 

package/assets/slash-commands/{review-trust-safety.md → guideline-trust-safety.md}

@@ -1,18 +1,10 @@
 ---
-name: review-trust-safety
-description: Review trust & safety - abuse prevention, moderation, user protection
+name: guideline-trust-safety
+description: Guideline: trust & safety - abuse prevention, moderation, user protection
 agent: coder
 ---
 
-# Trust & Safety Review
-
-## Mandate
-
-* Perform a **deep, thorough review** of trust and safety in this codebase.
-* **Delegate to multiple workers** to research different aspects in parallel; you act as the **final gate** to synthesize and verify quality.
-* **Review then Act**: identify issues, then **implement fixes directly**. Don't just report — fix.
-* **Single-pass delivery**: no deferrals; deliver complete implementation.
-* **Explore beyond the spec**: identify abuse vectors before bad actors find them.
+# Trust Safety Guideline
 
 ## Tech Stack
 

package/assets/slash-commands/{review-uiux.md → guideline-uiux.md}

@@ -1,18 +1,10 @@
 ---
-name: review-uiux
-description: Review UI/UX - design system, accessibility, user experience
+name: guideline-uiux
+description: Guideline: UI/UX - design system, accessibility, user experience
 agent: coder
 ---
 
-# UI/UX Review
-
-## Mandate
-
-* Perform a **deep, thorough review** of UI/UX in this codebase.
-* **Delegate to multiple workers** to research different aspects in parallel; you act as the **final gate** to synthesize and verify quality.
-* **Review then Act**: identify issues, then **implement fixes directly**. Don't just report — fix.
-* **Single-pass delivery**: no deferrals; deliver complete implementation.
-* **Explore beyond the spec**: if the current design needs fundamental rethinking, propose it.
+# UI/UX Guideline
 
 ## Tech Stack
 

package/assets/slash-commands/review.md

@@ -0,0 +1,68 @@
+---
+name: review
+description: Review codebase by domain - /review <what to review>
+agent: coder
+args:
+  - name: topic
+    description: What to review (e.g., auth, security, billing, "the login flow", "why it's slow")
+    required: true
+---
+
+# Review: $ARGS
+
+## Mandate
+
+* **Understand first.** Don't treat guidelines as checklists — absorb the principles, then apply judgment.
+* **Think like the failure mode.** Security? Think like an attacker. Performance? Think like a slow network. Auth? Think like a confused user.
+* **Delegate workers** for parallel research. You synthesize and verify.
+* **Fix, don't report.** Implement solutions directly.
+
+## Available Guidelines
+
+Read relevant guideline(s) based on what you're reviewing:
+
+| Guideline | Domain |
+|-----------|--------|
+| `/guideline-auth` | Sign-in, SSO, passkeys, verification |
+| `/guideline-account-security` | MFA, sessions, account recovery |
+| `/guideline-privacy` | Data handling, consent, GDPR/CCPA |
+| `/guideline-billing` | Stripe, webhooks, subscriptions |
+| `/guideline-pricing` | Pricing models, tiers, feature gating |
+| `/guideline-ledger` | Transactions, audit trails, reconciliation |
+| `/guideline-security` | OWASP, validation, secrets |
+| `/guideline-trust-safety` | Abuse prevention, rate limiting, fraud |
+| `/guideline-uiux` | Design system, accessibility |
+| `/guideline-seo` | Meta tags, structured data, crawlability |
+| `/guideline-pwa` | Service workers, offline, installability |
+| `/guideline-performance` | Core Web Vitals, bundle size, caching |
+| `/guideline-i18n` | Localization, routing, hreflang |
+| `/guideline-database` | Schema, indexes, migrations |
+| `/guideline-data-architecture` | Data models, relationships, integrity |
+| `/guideline-storage` | File uploads, CDN, blob storage |
+| `/guideline-observability` | Logging, metrics, tracing, alerts |
+| `/guideline-operability` | Deployment, rollback, feature flags |
+| `/guideline-delivery` | CI/CD, testing, release process |
+| `/guideline-growth` | Onboarding, activation, retention |
+| `/guideline-referral` | Referral programs, viral loops |
+| `/guideline-support` | Help systems, tickets, documentation |
+| `/guideline-admin` | Admin panel, RBAC, config |
+| `/guideline-discovery` | Feature discovery, competitive analysis |
+| `/guideline-code-quality` | Patterns, testing, maintainability |
+
+## Output
+
+```
+## Review: [topic]
+
+### Understanding
+[How this is implemented. Architecture, choices, tradeoffs.]
+
+### Issues
+[What's wrong and why it matters]
+
+### Fixed
+[Changes made]
+
+### Remaining
+[Needs human decision or blocked]
+```

package/package.json

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 {
 	"name": "@sylphx/flow",
-	"version": "2.15.3",
+	"version": "2.16.1",
 	"description": "One CLI to rule them all. Unified orchestration layer for Claude Code, OpenCode, Cursor and all AI development tools. Auto-detection, auto-installation, auto-upgrade.",
 	"type": "module",
 	"bin": {