@su-record/vibe 3.2.6 → 3.2.7

package/skills/vibe.run/SKILL.md

@@ -1,12 +1,19 @@
 ---
 name: vibe.run
-description: Execute implementation from SPEC
+description: 승인된 SPEC이 있고 구현을 시작할 때 — `.vibe/specs/<feature>.md`를 읽어 코드와 검증 산출물로 전개한다.
 argument-hint: '"feature name" or --phase N'
 user-invocable: true
 ---
 
 # /vibe.run
 
+## 완료 기준
+
+- [ ] 구현 요구사항이 승인된 SPEC의 REQ ID로 추적된다.
+- [ ] 변경 범위에 존재하는 build, lint, typecheck, test gate가 통과한다.
+- [ ] run ledger에 검증 결과와 exit code가 기록되어 있다.
+- [ ] 미완료 요구사항이 있으면 TODO와 사유가 기록되어 있다.
+
 Execute **Scenario-Driven Implementation** with automatic quality verification.
 
 > **Core Principle**: Scenarios are both the implementation unit and verification criteria. All scenarios passing = Quality guaranteed.
@@ -24,7 +31,7 @@ Execute **Scenario-Driven Implementation** with automatic quality verification.
 
 ---
 
-> **Timer**: Call `getCurrentTime` tool at the START. Record the result as `{start_time}`.
+> **Timer**: Query the system clock at START and record the result as `{start_time}`.
 
 > **Step Counter Reset (MANDATORY at START)**: Run this Bash command once at the very start:
 >
@@ -105,41 +112,7 @@ After implementing each scenario, **automatic verification**:
 | Code quality | Complexity, style, security | Static analysis |
 | **UI behavior** | **실제 브라우저에서 동작 확인** | **E2E Closed Loop** |
 
-### E2E Closed Loop (UI Scenarios)
-
-**UI 시나리오가 포함된 Feature일 때 자동 활성화.**
-
-Browser Tool Priority:
-
-| Priority | Tool | 용도 |
-|----------|------|------|
-| 1st | Agent Browser (접근성 트리) | AI 직접 조작, 최소 토큰 |
-| 2nd | Playwright Test Runner | 테스트 코드 실행, pass/fail 반환 |
-| 3rd | Playwright MCP (DOM) | 최후 수단, 토큰 비효율 |
-
-**활성화 조건:** Feature 파일에 UI 관련 시나리오 존재 + `.vibe/e2e/config.json`의 `closedLoop.enabled: true` (기본값) + dev server가 실행 중
-
-### Auto-Fix on Failure
-
-```
-Scenario verification failed
-      ↓ [Collect evidence]
-      ↓ [Root cause analysis]
-      ↓ [Read target file FULLY]
-      ↓ [Implement fix]
-      ↓ [Re-verify failed scenario only]
-      Repeat until pass (stuck 감지로 종료)
-```
-
-**Termination conditions (loop-contract JUDGE):**
-- PASS → 다음 scenario
-- stuck (같은 failure가 이전 라운드와 동일, `loop-ledger.js check-stuck`) → automationLevel confirm: 사용자 질문; autonomous: TODO + next scenario
-
-**Stakes 프로파일 (SSOT: `vibe/rules/loop-contract.md` Stakes 표):**
-- `demo`/`prototype` → max_iterations 1, 리뷰 1패스, **검증 스크립트 신규 생성 금지** — 검증은 기존 테스트 러너·브라우저 게이트만 사용한다. 새 verify_*.py / 검증 전용 스크립트 파일을 만들지 않는다.
-- JUDGE 검증 산출물 절제 (모든 stakes): 이번 feature 신규 검증 코드 바이트 합이 신규 구현 코드 바이트 합을 초과하면 (`git diff --numstat` 기준) P2 경고를 run-ledger 에 기록한다. advisory — 게이트 통과 여부는 불변.
-
----
+> **E2E Closed Loop (UI 시나리오) 와 실패 시 Auto-Fix 절차**: `references/e2e-and-autofix.md`
 
 ## **ULTRAWORK Mode** (ulw) — deprecated alias
 
@@ -154,11 +127,18 @@ Scenario verification failed
 
 ---
 
+## Stakes 프로파일 (실행 강도 조절)
+
+**Stakes 프로파일 (SSOT: `vibe/rules/loop-contract.md` Stakes 표):**
+- `demo`/`prototype` → max_iterations 1, 리뷰 1패스, **검증 스크립트 신규 생성 금지** — 검증은 기존 테스트 러너·브라우저 게이트만 사용한다. 새 verify_*.py / 검증 전용 스크립트 파일을 만들지 않는다.
+- JUDGE 검증 산출물 절제 (모든 stakes): 이번 feature 신규 검증 코드 바이트 합이 신규 구현 코드 바이트 합을 초과하면 (`git diff --numstat` 기준) P2 경고를 run-ledger 에 기록한다. advisory — 게이트 통과 여부는 불변.
+---
+
 ## Scope & Ledger Rules
 
 ### Run Ledger Tracking
 
-Every `/vibe.run` invocation is automatically recorded in `.vibe/metrics/run-ledger.json` (fields: `runStarted`, `runFeature`, `verifyPassed`, `verifyAt`). The `verifyPassed` flag is reset to `false` at run start and only set to `true` when `/vibe.verify` completes and records its result via `verify-ledger.js`. If the session ends without running `/vibe.verify`, the Stop hook will emit a warning to stderr; if `verifyGate.mode` is set to `"block"` in `.vibe/config.json`, the first Stop event will be blocked (once per run, loop-prevention flag prevents repeated blocking). The auto-commit hook also skips the commit unless `verifyPassed === true` and `verifyAt > runStarted`.
+Every `/vibe.run` invocation must explicitly initialize `.vibe/metrics/run-ledger.json` (fields: `runStarted`, `runFeature`, `verifyPassed`, `verifyAt`) and reset `verifyPassed` to `false`. Before completion, invoke `/vibe.verify`; its `verify-ledger.js` step must record `verifyPassed`, `verifyAt`, and command evidence, then read the ledger back and enforce `verifyPassed === true && verifyAt > runStarted`. Stop/auto-commit hooks may warn or short-circuit this sequence when available, but they are acceleration only and never the correctness basis.
 
 ### Interactive Checkpoints
 
@@ -188,256 +168,31 @@ Default: a
 
 ## Process
 
-### 1. Load SPEC + Feature
-
-**Search order:**
-```
-Step 1: Check split structure (folder)
-  .vibe/specs/{feature-name}/        → Folder: _index.md + phase files
-  .vibe/features/{feature-name}/     → Folder: _index.feature + phase files
-
-Step 2: If no folder, check single file
-  .vibe/specs/{feature-name}.md
-  .vibe/features/{feature-name}.feature
-
-Step 3: If neither → Error: "Run /vibe.spec first"
-```
-
-**Split structure:** Load `_index.md` first, then phase files in order. Execute phases sequentially (or per `--phase` flag).
-
-### 1-0. Compile + validate execution packet (MANDATORY)
-
-For a monolithic SPEC, compile it after resolving the canonical path. For a split SPEC, do not compile `_index.md`; defer this step until each active phase file is loaded in Phase Isolation Step B. Compile with `writeExecutionPacket`, then immediately verify the saved artifact with `validateExecutionPacket`.
-
-```bash
-node -e "import('file://{{VIBE_PATH}}/dist/tools/index.js').then(t => {
-  const projectPath=process.cwd(), specPath='.vibe/specs/{feature-name}.md';
-  const profile='{codex-or-claude-code}';
-  const written=t.writeExecutionPacket({projectPath,specPath,profile});
-  if(!written.ok){console.error(JSON.stringify(written.errors));process.exit(1)}
-  const checked=t.validateExecutionPacket({projectPath,specPath,packetPath:written.packetPath});
-  if(!checked.valid){console.error(checked.code);process.exit(1)}
-  console.log(written.packetPath);
-})"
-```
-
-- Codex uses profile `codex`; Claude Code uses `claude-code`.
-- Split SPECs compile each active `phase-N-*.md` immediately before that phase runs; `_index.md` remains the overview ANCHOR and is not treated as a phase contract.
-- Use the packet only when validation returns `valid: true`.
-- `STALE_PACKET`, invalid packet, preservation-audit failure, or budget failure is blocking: recompile from the canonical SPEC and never silently fall back to an unvalidated packet.
-- The packet is a derived execution view. The canonical SPEC remains the ANCHOR and source of truth.
-
-### 1-1. Phase Isolation Protocol (Large SPEC Guard, MANDATORY for 3+ phases)
-
-```
-Step A: Read _index.md (overview only — phase list, REQ IDs)
-Step B: For each Phase N:
-  1. RE-READ Phase N SPEC section (every time, no memory)
-  2. Compile + validate Phase N execution packet using the phase file path
-  3. RE-READ Phase N Feature scenarios
-  4. Extract Phase N scope: files, scenarios, requirements
-  5. Implement Phase N scenarios
-  6. Verify Phase N
-  7. Write Phase Checkpoint → .vibe/checkpoints/
-  8. DISCARD Phase N details from working memory
-Step C: Next Phase
-```
-
-**Phase Checkpoint** (`.vibe/checkpoints/{feature}-phase-{N}.md`):
-
-```markdown
-# Checkpoint: {feature} Phase {N}
-
-## Completed
-- Scenario 1: {name} ✅
-
-## Files Changed
-- src/auth.service.ts (added login(), validateToken())
-
-## State for Next Phase
-- Auth service exports: login(), logout(), validateToken()
-
-## Remaining Phases
-- Phase {N+1}: {name} — {scenario count} scenarios
-```
-
-**SPEC Re-anchoring (Before EVERY scenario):** Re-read the EXACT Given/When/Then from Feature file (not from memory). Compare: "Am I implementing what the SPEC says, or what I think it says?"
-
-**Scope Lock (Per Phase):**
-
-```
-At Phase start, declare:
-  MODIFY: [list of files this phase will touch]
-  CREATE: [list of files this phase will create]
-  DO NOT TOUCH: everything else
-```
-
-**Context Pressure:**
-
-| Context Level | Action |
-|---------------|--------|
-| < 50% | Normal execution |
-| 50-85% | Save checkpoint, trim exploration results |
-| 85%+ | Save checkpoint → `/new` → resume from checkpoint |
-| Phase boundary | Always save checkpoint |
-
-### 1-2. SPEC-First Gate
-
-> SPEC is the source of truth for code. To modify code, update the SPEC first.
-
-```
-Discovery: "An API endpoint not in SPEC is needed"
-    ├─ Already in SPEC? YES → Implement
-    ├─ Not in SPEC but within scope? → Add to SPEC + Feature → Implement
-    └─ Outside scope? → TODO in .vibe/todos/out-of-scope-{item}.md
-```
-
-SPEC changes and code changes must be in the **same commit**.
-
-### 2. Extract Scenario List
-
-```markdown
-| # | Scenario | Status |
-|---|----------|--------|
-| 1 | Valid login success | ⬜ |
-| 2 | Invalid password error | ⬜ |
-```
-
-### 3. Scenario-by-Scenario Implementation
-
-> Read `references/parallel-agents.md` for full parallel exploration patterns, background agents, parallel subagent group selection, and model routing.
-
-**For each scenario:**
-1. [Parallel exploration] Task(haiku) × 3 — related code, deps, patterns
-2. [Implement] Write/edit the minimum required code
-3. [Verify] Check Given/When/Then; E2E if UI scenario
-4. [Auto-fix loop] On failure: collect evidence → root cause → fix → re-verify
-
-**UI/UX Design Intelligence (auto-triggered before Phase 1 if UI keywords in SPEC):**
-- Task(haiku, `design-system-gen`): framework-specific component guidelines + chart/viz library advice (viz advice conditional on chart keywords)
-- Load `.vibe/design-system/{project}/MASTER.md` if present
-
-### 4. Brand Assets (New project only)
-
-> Read `references/brand-assets.md` when SPEC contains brand context and this is the first run.
-
-Trigger conditions: first run (no favicon.ico) + SPEC has brand context + Antigravity API key configured.
-
-### 5. Race Code Review
-
-> Read `references/race-review.md` for full Race Review invocation, confidence matrix, and quality gate thresholds.
-
-After all scenarios: GPT + Antigravity review in parallel. ULTRAWORK enables this by default.
-
-### 6. Quality Report (Auto-generated)
-
-```
-┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
-│  QUALITY REPORT: {feature}                                       │
-├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
-│  Scenarios: N/N passed                                          │
-│  Quality score: 94/100                                          │
-│  Build: ✅ | Tests: ✅ | Types: ✅ | Race review: ✅             │
-│  Started: {start_time}  Completed: {getCurrentTime}             │
-└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
-```
-
-### 7. Update Feature File
-
-Auto-update scenario status with `Last verified` timestamp and quality score.
-
-### 8. Coverage Verification Loop (RTM)
-
-> 루프 시맨틱은 `vibe/rules/loop-contract.md`를 따른다. 여기서의 exit 기준은 `coveragePercent === 100`. RTM 다이어그램, 출력 형식, 반복 규칙: `references/ralph-loop.md`
-
-After ALL phases complete:
-
-```bash
-# generateTraceabilityMatrix is synchronous — no .then()
-node -e "import('{{VIBE_PATH_URL}}/node_modules/@su-record/vibe/dist/tools/index.js').then(t => { const r = t.generateTraceabilityMatrix('{feature-name}', {projectPath: process.cwd()}); console.log(JSON.stringify(r, null, 2)); })"
-```
-
-> Default SPEC path is `.vibe/specs/<feature>.md`. `status === 'empty'` must be treated as failed/not-applicable — never as 100% pass.
-
-JUDGE: `coveragePercent === 100` → 루프 종료. stuck(연속 2회 동일 커버리지) → automationLevel confirm이면 사용자 질문; autonomous이면 TODO + done.
-
----
-
-## Core Tools (Semantic Analysis & Memory)
-
-```bash
-# All tools via:
-node -e "import('{{VIBE_PATH_URL}}/node_modules/@su-record/vibe/dist/tools/index.js').then(t => t.TOOL_NAME({...args}).then(r => console.log(r.content[0].text)))"
-```
-
-| Tool | Purpose |
-|------|---------|
-| `analyzeComplexity` | Analyze code complexity |
-| `validateCodeQuality` | Validate code quality |
-| `saveMemory` | Save important decisions |
-| `recallMemory` | Recall saved memory |
-| `listMemories` | List all memories |
-
-Session management: start hook auto-calls `startSession`; context 80%+ triggers `autoSaveContext`.
-
----
-
-## Coding Guidelines (Mandatory)
-
-> Read `references/race-review.md` for full type safety guidelines, language-specific examples, and the type-violation detection/escalation table.
+### Process 단계 (전체 절차: `references/process-steps.md`)
 
-**TypeScript — core rule:**
-```typescript
-// BAD
-function process(data: any): any { return data.foo; }
-
-// GOOD
-function process(data: unknown): Result {
-  if (isValidData(data)) return data.foo;
-  throw new Error('Invalid');
-}
-```
-
-No `any` / `as any` / `@ts-ignore` — fix at root. Explicit return types on all functions.
-
-**Detection outcome:** Type violations are detected by static analysis and injected as `additionalContext`; commit-level enforcement occurs at the auto-commit verify gate.
-
----
-
-## Rules Reference
-
-- `core/development-philosophy.md` — Surgical precision, modify only requested scope
-- `core/quick-start.md` — Korean, DRY, SRP, YAGNI
-- `standards/complexity-metrics.md` — Functions ≤50 lines, nesting ≤3 levels
-- `quality/checklist.md` — Code quality checklist
-- Language guide: `~/.claude/vibe/languages/{stack}.md`
-
----
-
-## TRUST 5 Principles
-
-| Principle | Description |
-|-----------|-------------|
-| **T**est-first | Write tests first |
-| **R**eadable | Clear code |
-| **U**nified | Consistent style |
-| **S**ecured | Consider security |
-| **T**rackable | Logging, monitoring |
-
----
-
-## Auto-Retrospective (Post-Implementation)
+| # | 단계 | 핵심 게이트 |
+|---|---|---|
+| 1 | Load SPEC + Feature | SPEC 부재 시 진행 금지 |
+| 1-0 | Compile + validate execution packet | **MANDATORY** — 컴파일 실패 시 중단 (`references/exec-plan.md`) |
+| 1-1 | Phase Isolation Protocol | 3+ phase SPEC 은 phase 단위 격리 + 체크포인트 필수 |
+| 1-2 | SPEC-First Gate | SPEC 에 없는 것을 구현하지 않는다 |
+| 2 | Extract Scenario List | Feature 파일의 시나리오가 작업 단위 |
+| 3 | Scenario-by-Scenario Implementation | 시나리오 하나씩 — 병렬 금지 |
+| 4 | Brand Assets | 신규 프로젝트만 (`references/brand-assets.md`) |
+| 5 | Race Code Review | `references/race-review.md` |
+| 6 | Quality Report | 자동 생성 |
+| 7 | Update Feature File | 시나리오 상태 반영 |
+| 8 | Coverage Verification Loop (RTM) | 커버리지 미달 시 루프 |
 
-After ALL phases complete, save to `.vibe/retros/{feature-name}.md`:
+> 도구·코딩 가이드라인·TRUST 5·자동 회고: `references/guidelines-and-tools.md`
 
-```markdown
-## Retrospective: {feature-name}
-### What Worked / What Didn't / Key Decisions / Lessons Learned
-```
+### 1-0. Execution packet (MANDATORY — 본문 유지)
 
-Keep under 20 lines. Save key lessons via `core_save_memory`. Update `claude-progress.txt`.
+단일 SPEC 은 canonical path 해석 후 컴파일한다. 분할 SPEC 은 `_index.md` 를 컴파일하지 않고, Phase Isolation Step B 에서 각 활성 phase 파일이 로드될 때까지 미룬다.
+`writeExecutionPacket` 으로 컴파일한 뒤 **즉시** `validateExecutionPacket` 으로 저장 산출물을 검증한다.
+`STALE_PACKET`·invalid packet·preservation-audit 실패·budget 실패는 **blocking** 이다 — canonical SPEC 에서 재컴파일하며, 검증되지 않은 패킷으로 조용히 폴백하지 않는다.
 
----
+> 전체 절차와 코드: `references/exec-plan.md` · `references/process-steps.md`
 
 ## Input / Output
 
@@ -457,389 +212,35 @@ Keep under 20 lines. Save key lessons via `core_save_memory`. Update `claude-pro
 
 ARGUMENTS: $ARGUMENTS
 
-## Bundled internal: arch-guard
-
-
-# Arch Guard — Architecture Boundary Test Generator
-
-> **Principle**: "Mechanical enforcement over documentation." If a rule exists only in docs, it will be violated. Turn architecture constraints into failing tests.
-
-## When to Use
-
-| Scenario | Signal |
-|----------|--------|
-| `vibe init` / `vibe update` | Auto-generate for detected stack |
-| New layer/module added | Boundaries need enforcement |
-| Architecture violation found in review | Prevent recurrence with test |
-| "Services should not import UI" type rules | Turn into automated check |
-
-## Core Flow
+## Bundled internals (조건부 로드)
 
-```
-DETECT → INFER → GENERATE → VERIFY
-```
-
-### Step 1: DETECT — Identify Project Architecture
-
-Analyze the project to determine its layer structure:
-
-```
-Parallel exploration:
-- Agent 1: Scan directory structure (src/, app/, lib/, etc.)
-- Agent 2: Read existing architecture docs (CLAUDE.md, README, ADR)
-- Agent 3: Analyze import graph (which files import what)
-```
-
-**Common patterns to detect:**
-
-| Pattern | Layers | Typical Stacks |
-|---------|--------|----------------|
-| MVC | Controller → Service → Model | Rails, NestJS, Spring |
-| Clean Architecture | UI → Application → Domain → Infrastructure | General |
-| Feature-based | Feature A ↛ Feature B internals | Next.js, React |
-| Hexagonal | Adapters → Ports → Domain | DDD projects |
-| Component hierarchy | Page → Feature → Shared → UI Primitives | Frontend |
-
-### Step 2: INFER — Define Boundary Rules
-
-From detected structure, generate rules:
-
-```typescript
-// Rule format
-interface ArchRule {
-  name: string;           // "service-no-ui-import"
-  from: string;           // Glob pattern: "src/services/**"
-  cannotImport: string[]; // ["src/components/**", "src/pages/**"]
-  canImport: string[];    // ["src/models/**", "src/utils/**"]
-  reason: string;         // "Services must be UI-agnostic"
-}
-```
-
-**Default rules by stack:**
-
-| Stack | Rule |
-|-------|------|
-| Next.js / React | `components/` cannot import from `pages/` or `app/` |
-| Next.js / React | `lib/` cannot import from `components/` |
-| NestJS | `*.service.ts` cannot import from `*.controller.ts` |
-| NestJS | `*.module.ts` is the only valid cross-boundary import |
-| General TS | `src/domain/` cannot import from `src/infra/` |
-| General TS | No circular dependencies between top-level dirs |
-| Python Django | `models.py` cannot import from `views.py` |
-| Python FastAPI | `schemas/` cannot import from `routers/` |
-
-### Step 3: GENERATE — Create Test File
-
-Output: `tests/arch-guard.test.ts` (or equivalent for stack)
-
-```typescript
-/**
- * Architecture Boundary Tests
- * Generated by arch-guard skill
- *
- * These tests enforce architectural constraints mechanically.
- * If a test fails, it means an import violates the intended architecture.
- */
-import { describe, it, expect } from 'vitest';
-import fs from 'fs';
-import path from 'path';
-
-// Helper: extract imports from a file
-function extractImports(filePath: string): string[] {
-  const content = fs.readFileSync(filePath, 'utf-8');
-  const importRegex = /(?:import|require)\s*\(?['"]([^'"]+)['"]\)?/g;
-  const imports: string[] = [];
-  let match;
-  while ((match = importRegex.exec(content)) !== null) {
-    imports.push(match[1]);
-  }
-  return imports;
-}
-
-// Helper: resolve relative import to absolute path
-function resolveImport(fromFile: string, importPath: string): string {
-  if (importPath.startsWith('.')) {
-    return path.resolve(path.dirname(fromFile), importPath);
-  }
-  return importPath; // external package
-}
-
-// Helper: glob files matching pattern
-function globFiles(pattern: string, baseDir: string): string[] {
-  // Use fast-glob or manual recursive scan
-  // Implementation depends on available dependencies
-}
-
-describe('Architecture Boundaries', () => {
-  // GENERATED RULES GO HERE
-  // Each rule becomes a test case:
-
-  it('services cannot import UI components', () => {
-    const serviceFiles = globFiles('src/services/**/*.ts', process.cwd());
-    const violations: string[] = [];
-
-    for (const file of serviceFiles) {
-      const imports = extractImports(file);
-      for (const imp of imports) {
-        const resolved = resolveImport(file, imp);
-        if (resolved.includes('/components/') || resolved.includes('/pages/')) {
-          violations.push(`${file} imports ${imp}`);
-        }
-      }
-    }
-
-    expect(violations).toEqual([]);
-  });
-});
-```
-
-### Step 4: VERIFY — Run and Fix
-
-1. Run the generated tests: `npx vitest run tests/arch-guard.test.ts`
-2. If violations found:
-   - Report each violation with file:line
-   - Suggest fix (move shared code to appropriate layer)
-   - Do NOT auto-fix — violations need human review
+이 세 구현은 `vibe.run` 의 일부지만 **매 실행에 전부 필요하지는 않다.** 해당 조건에 걸릴 때만 읽는다 —
+세 개를 항상 로드하면 호출당 컨텍스트의 약 45%가 쓰이지 않을 자료로 채워진다.
 
-## Output Files
-
-| File | Purpose |
-|------|---------|
-| `tests/arch-guard.test.ts` | Executable boundary tests |
-| `.vibe/arch-rules.json` | Machine-readable rules (for CI) |
-
-## Customization
-
-Users can add custom rules to `.vibe/arch-rules.json`:
-
-```json
-{
-  "rules": [
-    {
-      "name": "no-direct-db-in-handlers",
-      "from": "src/handlers/**",
-      "cannotImport": ["src/db/**"],
-      "reason": "Handlers must use services, not direct DB access"
-    }
-  ]
-}
-```
-
-The test generator reads this file and adds custom rules to the test suite.
-
-## Integration
-
-- `vibe init` → auto-detect and generate initial arch-guard tests
-- `vibe update` → refresh rules if directory structure changed
-- Pre-commit hook → run arch-guard tests before commit
-- `vibe.review` (skill) → code-reviewer (focus: architecture) checks against arch-rules.json
+| 내부 구현 | 로드 조건 | 본문 |
+|---|---|---|
+## Bundled internal: arch-guard
 
+번들 유지 — 별도 discovery 항목으로 노출하지 않는다. 본문: `references/arch-guard.md`
 ## Bundled internal: exec-plan
 
+번들 유지 — 별도 discovery 항목으로 노출하지 않는다. 본문: `references/exec-plan.md`
+## Bundled internal: restraint
 
-# ExecPlan — Self-Contained Execution Plan Generator
-
-> **Principle**: "If the agent can't see it, it doesn't exist." Every decision, file path, pattern, and verification step must be explicit in the plan — no implicit knowledge allowed.
-
-## When to Use
-
-Before `/vibe.run`, generate an ExecPlan to make execution deterministic:
-
-| Scenario | Signal |
-|----------|--------|
-| Complex SPEC (3+ phases) | Agent needs long autonomous execution |
-| Team/multi-agent execution | Multiple agents need shared understanding |
-| Context window pressure | Plan survives `/new` session handoff |
-| Unfamiliar codebase | Agent can't rely on implicit knowledge |
-
-## Core Flow
-
-```
-SPEC + Feature → ANALYZE → RESOLVE → GENERATE → PERSIST
-```
-
-### Step 1: ANALYZE — Extract Everything Needed
-
-Read the SPEC and Feature files, then extract:
-
-```
-For each Phase → For each Scenario:
-  1. Requirements (REQ-* IDs)
-  2. Given/When/Then conditions
-  3. Affected files (MUST exist — verify with Glob)
-  4. Dependencies (imports, packages)
-  5. Existing patterns to follow (read actual code, don't assume)
-```
-
-**Parallel exploration** (3+ agents):
-- Agent 1: Map all file paths mentioned/implied in SPEC → verify they exist
-- Agent 2: For each affected file, extract current interfaces/types/exports
-- Agent 3: Find existing patterns (naming conventions, error handling, test structure)
-
-### Step 2: RESOLVE — Eliminate All Ambiguity
-
-For every decision point in the SPEC, resolve it NOW:
-
-| Ambiguity | Resolution |
-|-----------|------------|
-| "Add validation" | → Which fields? What rules? What error messages? |
-| "Handle errors" | → Which error codes? What response format? |
-| "Follow existing pattern" | → Copy the ACTUAL pattern code into the plan |
-| "Update tests" | → Which test file? What test framework? What assertions? |
-
-**Rule**: If you'd need to "figure it out later", resolve it now. The plan must be executable by an agent with ZERO codebase knowledge.
-
-### Step 3: GENERATE — Write the ExecPlan
-
-Output format: `.vibe/specs/{feature-name}-execplan.md`
-
-```markdown
-# ExecPlan: {feature-name}
-
-## Meta
-- SPEC: .vibe/specs/{name}.md
-- Feature: .vibe/features/{name}.feature
-- Generated: {timestamp}
-- Phases: {count}
-- Scenarios: {count}
-
-## Pre-flight Checks
-- [ ] `npm run build` passes
-- [ ] `npx vitest run` passes (baseline)
-- [ ] Required files exist: {list}
-
-## Phase {N}: {phase-name}
-
-### Environment
-- Files to modify: {exact paths}
-- Files to create: {exact paths}
-- Dependencies to add: {package@version}
-- Patterns to follow: (inline code snippets from codebase)
-
-### Scenario {N}.{M}: {scenario-name}
-
-**Given**: {precondition}
-→ Setup: {exact code/commands to establish precondition}
-
-**When**: {action}
-→ Implement: {step-by-step implementation instructions}
-  - File: {path}
-  - Location: after line containing `{anchor text}`
-  - Code: (inline snippet)
-  - Imports needed: {list}
+번들 유지 — 별도 discovery 항목으로 노출하지 않는다. 본문: `references/restraint.md`
 
-**Then**: {expected result}
-→ Verify:
-  - Command: `{test command}`
-  - Expected: {output/behavior}
-  - Fallback: {what to do if verification fails}
+| **arch-guard** | 아키텍처 경계 테스트를 생성·검증할 때 (레이어 위반 감지가 필요한 SPEC) | `references/arch-guard.md` |
+| **exec-plan** | Step 1-0 — execution packet 을 컴파일할 때 | `references/exec-plan.md` |
+| **restraint** | 아래 요약으로 판단이 서지 않을 때 (전문: 사다리 단계별 근거·차단 충동 목록) | `references/restraint.md` |
 
-### Phase {N} Gate
-- [ ] Build: `npm run build`
-- [ ] Tests: `npx vitest run {relevant-test-files}`
-- [ ] Type check: `npx tsc --noEmit`
+**restraint 요약 (항상 적용 — 상세는 위 reference):**
 
-## Completion Criteria
-- Coverage threshold: ≥95%
-- All scenarios passing
-- No regressions in existing tests
-- RTM: `generateTraceabilityMatrix("{feature-name}")`
 ```
+YAGNI 사다리: 지금 필요한가? → 아니면 쓰지 않는다.
+  추상화는 3번째 중복에서. 설정 항목은 2번째 요구에서. 플러그인 구조는 외부 사용자가 생겼을 때.
 
-### Step 4: PERSIST — Save and Link
-
-1. Save ExecPlan to `.vibe/specs/{feature-name}-execplan.md`
-2. Save session context: `save_memory("execplan-{feature}", {summary})`
-3. Output execution command:
+Pike 규칙: 측정 없이 최적화하지 않는다. 한 부분이 나머지를 압도하지 않으면 튜닝하지 않는다.
+  n 은 대체로 작다. 단순한 코드가 영리한 코드를 이긴다. 데이터가 지배한다.
 
+Restraint 가 무효화하지 못하는 것: 정확성 · 보안 · 데이터 무결성 · 사용자가 명시적으로 요청한 것
 ```
-Ready to execute:
-  /vibe.run "{feature-name}" ultrawork
-
-Or hand off to new session:
-  /vibe.continue
-  → Load: .vibe/specs/{feature-name}-execplan.md
-```
-
-## Quality Checks
-
-| Check | Criteria |
-|-------|----------|
-| No implicit knowledge | Every file path verified with Glob |
-| No "figure it out" | Every decision resolved with actual code |
-| Survives handoff | Plan readable without any prior context |
-| Inline patterns | Actual code snippets, not "follow existing pattern" |
-| Verification steps | Every scenario has a concrete verification command |
-
-## Anti-patterns
-
-- "See the existing implementation" → Copy the relevant code inline
-- "Follow the pattern in X" → Show the actual pattern
-- "Standard error handling" → Specify exact error codes and messages
-- "Update tests accordingly" → Name the test file, framework, and assertions
-
-## Bundled internal: restraint
-
-
-# Restraint — Don't Write It, Don't Tune It (Yet)
-
-Two constraints, one gate:
-
-- **No premature code.** New abstractions must be *pulled* by a demonstrated
-  need, never pushed by "might need it later." Once the code exists, deleting
-  it costs more than never writing it.
-- **No premature optimization.** Performance work must be *pulled* by a
-  measurement, never by a hunch.
-
-## The YAGNI Ladder (code axis)
-
-Satisfy the need at the **highest** rung that covers it; lower rungs are
-blocked while a higher one applies:
-
-1. **Not needed** — the requirement doesn't ask for it → don't build it
-2. **Stdlib / built-ins** already do it (`crypto`, `Intl`, `pathlib`, …)
-3. **Native platform feature** does it (`<input type="date">`, CSS `:has()`, DB constraints)
-4. **Already-installed dependency** covers it — check the lockfile, don't guess
-5. **One line** — a single expression; no new file, no class
-6. **Minimal code** — only now, and nothing for "later"
-
-Tie-break: native beats a one-liner; stdlib beats a dependency. Generalize
-only when a *second* caller exists.
-
-## Pike's Rules (optimization axis)
-
-- You can't tell where a program spends its time — bottlenecks surprise.
-  **Measure; don't guess.**
-- Don't tune until one part *measurably* overwhelms the rest.
-- Fancy algorithms are slow when n is small — and n is usually small.
-  Ask "what's n?" before "what's the Big-O?"
-- Simple algorithms + the right data structures beat clever code. Data dominates.
-
-Optimization is justified only when ALL hold: a measured bottleneck exists →
-it dominates runtime → the fix is the simplest change addressing it → you
-re-measure after.
-
-## Blocked Impulses
-
-| Impulse | Constraint | Counter |
-|---|---|---|
-| helper / utility / wrapper / manager class | rungs 1–5 | a stdlib call or one line usually suffices |
-| config system for one value | rung 1 | a `const` is the config |
-| generic `Processor(strategy, validator…)` | rung 1 | one concrete function until a second caller exists |
-| "add a cache here" / "parallelize this" | measure first | is this path even hot? Often it's I/O |
-| swap in a B-tree / trie / skip list | what's n? | O(n²) with n=100 is microseconds |
-| "this loop looks slow" | measure first | the bottleneck is probably elsewhere |
-
-## Overrides — Restraint Never Erodes These
-
-1. **Security and trust-boundary work are requirements**, not optional
-   complexity. Input validation, auth checks, escaping stay in — "one line"
-   is no excuse to drop them.
-2. **Deliberate simplifications get a comment + upgrade path**, so the next
-   reader sees a *choice*, not an oversight:
-
-   ```ts
-   // Global lock is enough at current throughput.
-   // Switch to per-account locking if write contention shows up.
-   const lock = new Mutex();
-   ```