@su-record/vibe 2.7.22 → 2.8.0
This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
- package/CLAUDE.md +4 -0
- package/agents/ui/ui-antipattern-detector.md +8 -0
- package/dist/cli/commands/upgrade.d.ts.map +1 -1
- package/dist/cli/commands/upgrade.js +14 -4
- package/dist/cli/commands/upgrade.js.map +1 -1
- package/dist/cli/postinstall/constants.d.ts.map +1 -1
- package/dist/cli/postinstall/constants.js +17 -13
- package/dist/cli/postinstall/constants.js.map +1 -1
- package/dist/infra/lib/SkillFrontmatter.d.ts +1 -0
- package/dist/infra/lib/SkillFrontmatter.d.ts.map +1 -1
- package/dist/infra/lib/SkillFrontmatter.js +4 -0
- package/dist/infra/lib/SkillFrontmatter.js.map +1 -1
- package/package.json +1 -1
- package/skills/claude-md-guide/SKILL.md +350 -0
- package/skills/commit-push-pr/SKILL.md +1 -0
- package/skills/create-prd/SKILL.md +89 -0
- package/skills/design-audit/SKILL.md +151 -0
- package/skills/design-critique/SKILL.md +138 -0
- package/skills/design-distill/SKILL.md +129 -0
- package/skills/design-normalize/SKILL.md +132 -0
- package/skills/design-polish/SKILL.md +130 -0
- package/skills/design-teach/SKILL.md +181 -0
- package/skills/exec-plan/SKILL.md +1 -0
- package/skills/parallel-research/SKILL.md +1 -0
- package/skills/prioritization-frameworks/SKILL.md +86 -0
- package/skills/techdebt/SKILL.md +1 -0
- package/skills/ui-ux-pro-max/SKILL.md +14 -0
- package/skills/ui-ux-pro-max/reference/color-and-contrast.md +517 -0
- package/skills/ui-ux-pro-max/reference/interaction-design.md +544 -0
- package/skills/ui-ux-pro-max/reference/motion-design.md +591 -0
- package/skills/ui-ux-pro-max/reference/responsive-design.md +463 -0
- package/skills/ui-ux-pro-max/reference/spatial-design.md +390 -0
- package/skills/ui-ux-pro-max/reference/typography.md +455 -0
- package/skills/ui-ux-pro-max/reference/ux-writing.md +469 -0
- package/skills/user-personas/SKILL.md +74 -0
|
@@ -0,0 +1,130 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
---
|
|
2
|
+
name: design-polish
|
|
3
|
+
description: "Pre-ship final polish pass — pixel alignment, interaction states, micro-details check and auto-fix. Use when design-polish, ui-polish, final-pass, ship-ready."
|
|
4
|
+
triggers: [design-polish, ui-polish, final-pass, ship-ready]
|
|
5
|
+
priority: 50
|
|
6
|
+
---
|
|
7
|
+
|
|
8
|
+
# Design Polish — Pre-Ship Final Pass
|
|
9
|
+
|
|
10
|
+
Last-mile quality pass before shipping. Checks pixel-level details and **directly fixes** issues found.
|
|
11
|
+
|
|
12
|
+
## Usage
|
|
13
|
+
|
|
14
|
+
```
|
|
15
|
+
/design-polish <target> # Polish specific component/page
|
|
16
|
+
/design-polish . # Polish all changed UI files
|
|
17
|
+
```
|
|
18
|
+
|
|
19
|
+
## Checklist
|
|
20
|
+
|
|
21
|
+
### 1. Alignment & Spacing
|
|
22
|
+
|
|
23
|
+
- [ ] Elements align to consistent grid (4px or 8px base)
|
|
24
|
+
- [ ] Spacing between sections follows rhythm (not arbitrary gaps)
|
|
25
|
+
- [ ] Text baselines align across columns
|
|
26
|
+
- [ ] Icons vertically centered with adjacent text
|
|
27
|
+
- [ ] Padding inside containers is symmetric unless intentional
|
|
28
|
+
|
|
29
|
+
### 2. Interaction States (Complete Set)
|
|
30
|
+
|
|
31
|
+
Every interactive element must have ALL applicable states:
|
|
32
|
+
|
|
33
|
+
| State | Check |
|
|
34
|
+
|-------|-------|
|
|
35
|
+
| Default | Base appearance defined |
|
|
36
|
+
| Hover | Visual feedback on mouse enter |
|
|
37
|
+
| Focus | Visible focus ring (a11y requirement) |
|
|
38
|
+
| Active / Pressed | Visual response on click/tap |
|
|
39
|
+
| Disabled | Reduced opacity + `pointer-events: none` + `aria-disabled` |
|
|
40
|
+
| Loading | Spinner or skeleton replacing content |
|
|
41
|
+
| Error | Red/danger styling + error message |
|
|
42
|
+
| Success | Confirmation feedback (toast, checkmark, color change) |
|
|
43
|
+
|
|
44
|
+
### 3. Typography & Copy
|
|
45
|
+
|
|
46
|
+
- [ ] No orphaned words (single word on last line of heading)
|
|
47
|
+
- [ ] Consistent capitalization (Title Case vs sentence case)
|
|
48
|
+
- [ ] No placeholder text ("Lorem ipsum", "TODO", "test")
|
|
49
|
+
- [ ] Truncation with ellipsis where text can overflow
|
|
50
|
+
- [ ] Line length ≤ 75 characters for readability
|
|
51
|
+
|
|
52
|
+
### 4. Visual Consistency
|
|
53
|
+
|
|
54
|
+
- [ ] Border radius consistent across same-level elements
|
|
55
|
+
- [ ] Shadow depth matches elevation hierarchy
|
|
56
|
+
- [ ] Icon sizes consistent (16/20/24px common set)
|
|
57
|
+
- [ ] Color usage matches semantic meaning (red=error, green=success)
|
|
58
|
+
|
|
59
|
+
### 5. Cleanup
|
|
60
|
+
|
|
61
|
+
- [ ] No `console.log` statements
|
|
62
|
+
- [ ] No commented-out JSX/HTML
|
|
63
|
+
- [ ] No `z-index` values > 100 without documented reason
|
|
64
|
+
- [ ] No inline styles that should be classes/tokens
|
|
65
|
+
- [ ] No dead CSS classes
|
|
66
|
+
|
|
67
|
+
## Auto-Fix Rules
|
|
68
|
+
|
|
69
|
+
| Issue | Fix Action |
|
|
70
|
+
|-------|-----------|
|
|
71
|
+
| Missing hover state on button | Add hover style using existing token |
|
|
72
|
+
| Missing focus ring | Add `focus-visible` outline |
|
|
73
|
+
| Missing disabled state | Add disabled variant with reduced opacity |
|
|
74
|
+
| Inconsistent border radius | Normalize to nearest design token |
|
|
75
|
+
| Inline color values | Replace with CSS variable |
|
|
76
|
+
| `console.log` in UI files | Remove |
|
|
77
|
+
| Commented-out code | Remove |
|
|
78
|
+
|
|
79
|
+
## Process
|
|
80
|
+
|
|
81
|
+
1. Read target files fully
|
|
82
|
+
2. Run checklist against each file
|
|
83
|
+
3. Collect findings with file:line references
|
|
84
|
+
4. Apply auto-fixes for safe items
|
|
85
|
+
5. Report items requiring manual review
|
|
86
|
+
6. Re-verify fixed files pass checklist
|
|
87
|
+
|
|
88
|
+
## Output Format
|
|
89
|
+
|
|
90
|
+
```markdown
|
|
91
|
+
## Design Polish: {target}
|
|
92
|
+
|
|
93
|
+
### Auto-Fixed
|
|
94
|
+
- ✅ {file}:{line} — Added hover state to submit button
|
|
95
|
+
- ✅ {file}:{line} — Replaced #3B82F6 with var(--color-primary)
|
|
96
|
+
- ✅ {file}:{line} — Removed console.log
|
|
97
|
+
|
|
98
|
+
### Manual Review Needed
|
|
99
|
+
- ⚠️ {file}:{line} — Orphaned word in heading (layout choice)
|
|
100
|
+
- ⚠️ {file}:{line} — Missing loading state on async action
|
|
101
|
+
|
|
102
|
+
### Summary
|
|
103
|
+
- Items checked: {N}
|
|
104
|
+
- Auto-fixed: {N}
|
|
105
|
+
- Manual review: {N}
|
|
106
|
+
- Ship-ready: {yes/no}
|
|
107
|
+
```
|
|
108
|
+
|
|
109
|
+
## Preparation
|
|
110
|
+
|
|
111
|
+
Before running polish:
|
|
112
|
+
|
|
113
|
+
1. **Read** `.claude/vibe/design-context.json`
|
|
114
|
+
- If missing → display: "Run `/design-teach` first for better results" → proceed with defaults
|
|
115
|
+
- If parse error → display warning → proceed with defaults → recommend `/design-teach`
|
|
116
|
+
- If present → apply brand-appropriate micro-interaction styles from `aesthetic.style`
|
|
117
|
+
2. **Read** `.claude/vibe/design-system/*/MASTER.md` (if exists) for token references
|
|
118
|
+
|
|
119
|
+
## Next Steps
|
|
120
|
+
|
|
121
|
+
| If Result Shows | Recommended Next |
|
|
122
|
+
|----------------|-----------------|
|
|
123
|
+
| All items pass | Ship ready — no further action needed |
|
|
124
|
+
| Design system gaps found | `/design-normalize` first, then re-run `/design-polish` |
|
|
125
|
+
|
|
126
|
+
## Important
|
|
127
|
+
|
|
128
|
+
- **Modifying**: This skill directly applies safe fixes.
|
|
129
|
+
- **Conservative**: Only auto-fixes items with clear, safe remediation. Ambiguous items flagged for manual review.
|
|
130
|
+
- **Pairs with**: Run `/design-audit` first for broad issues, then `/design-polish` for final touches.
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,181 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
---
|
|
2
|
+
name: design-teach
|
|
3
|
+
description: "Gather and store project design context — target audience, brand personality, aesthetic direction, constraints. Used by other design-* skills. Use when design-teach, design-setup, design-context."
|
|
4
|
+
triggers: [design-teach, design-setup, design-context]
|
|
5
|
+
priority: 50
|
|
6
|
+
---
|
|
7
|
+
|
|
8
|
+
# Design Teach — Project Design Context Gathering
|
|
9
|
+
|
|
10
|
+
Collect project-specific design context so all design-* skills produce tailored, brand-aware results. Saves to `.claude/vibe/design-context.json`.
|
|
11
|
+
|
|
12
|
+
## Usage
|
|
13
|
+
|
|
14
|
+
```
|
|
15
|
+
/design-teach # Interactive context gathering
|
|
16
|
+
/design-teach --update # Update existing context
|
|
17
|
+
```
|
|
18
|
+
|
|
19
|
+
## Process
|
|
20
|
+
|
|
21
|
+
### Step 1: Auto-Explore Codebase
|
|
22
|
+
|
|
23
|
+
Before asking questions, automatically gather existing signals:
|
|
24
|
+
|
|
25
|
+
| Signal | Where to Look |
|
|
26
|
+
|--------|---------------|
|
|
27
|
+
| CSS variables / tokens | `*.css`, `tailwind.config.*`, `theme.*` |
|
|
28
|
+
| Color palette | Existing color definitions, brand assets |
|
|
29
|
+
| Typography | Font imports, font-family declarations |
|
|
30
|
+
| Component library | `package.json` dependencies (MUI, Chakra, shadcn, etc.) |
|
|
31
|
+
| Design system | `.claude/vibe/design-system/*/MASTER.md` |
|
|
32
|
+
| Existing context | `.claude/vibe/design-context.json` (if updating) |
|
|
33
|
+
|
|
34
|
+
### Step 2: Ask Clarifying Questions
|
|
35
|
+
|
|
36
|
+
Present findings from Step 1, then ask what's missing:
|
|
37
|
+
|
|
38
|
+
**1. Target Audience**
|
|
39
|
+
- Who are the primary users? (developers, consumers, enterprise, internal)
|
|
40
|
+
- Technical sophistication? (tech-savvy, general public, mixed)
|
|
41
|
+
- Usage context? (desktop office, mobile on-the-go, both)
|
|
42
|
+
|
|
43
|
+
**2. Brand Personality**
|
|
44
|
+
- How should the product feel? (professional, playful, minimal, bold, warm)
|
|
45
|
+
- Reference products with similar feel? (e.g., "Linear-like", "Notion-like")
|
|
46
|
+
- Any brand guidelines or style guide URL?
|
|
47
|
+
|
|
48
|
+
**3. Aesthetic Direction**
|
|
49
|
+
- Visual density preference? (spacious, balanced, dense)
|
|
50
|
+
- Color mood? (warm, cool, neutral, vibrant)
|
|
51
|
+
- Typography mood? (modern sans, classic serif, monospace-technical)
|
|
52
|
+
|
|
53
|
+
**4. Constraints**
|
|
54
|
+
- Accessibility requirements? (WCAG AA, AAA, specific needs)
|
|
55
|
+
- Supported devices? (desktop-only, mobile-first, responsive)
|
|
56
|
+
- Dark mode required?
|
|
57
|
+
- Performance budget? (target LCP, bundle size limits)
|
|
58
|
+
|
|
59
|
+
### Step 3: Save Context
|
|
60
|
+
|
|
61
|
+
Write gathered context to `.claude/vibe/design-context.json` using the Write tool.
|
|
62
|
+
|
|
63
|
+
**Schema (v1):**
|
|
64
|
+
|
|
65
|
+
```json
|
|
66
|
+
{
|
|
67
|
+
"$schema": "design-context-v1",
|
|
68
|
+
"createdAt": "ISO-8601",
|
|
69
|
+
"updatedAt": "ISO-8601",
|
|
70
|
+
"audience": {
|
|
71
|
+
"primary": "대상 사용자 설명",
|
|
72
|
+
"context": "사용 환경 (desktop/mobile/mixed)",
|
|
73
|
+
"expertise": "기술 수준 (beginner/intermediate/expert)"
|
|
74
|
+
},
|
|
75
|
+
"brand": {
|
|
76
|
+
"personality": ["형용사 3-5개"],
|
|
77
|
+
"tone": "formal | casual | playful | professional (가이드라인, 자유 입력 가능)",
|
|
78
|
+
"existingAssets": "기존 브랜드 가이드라인 경로 (선택)"
|
|
79
|
+
},
|
|
80
|
+
"aesthetic": {
|
|
81
|
+
"style": "minimal | bold | elegant | playful | corporate (가이드라인, 자유 입력 가능)",
|
|
82
|
+
"colorMood": "warm | cool | neutral | vibrant | muted (가이드라인, 자유 입력 가능)",
|
|
83
|
+
"typographyMood": "modern | classic | geometric | humanist (가이드라인, 자유 입력 가능)",
|
|
84
|
+
"references": ["참조 사이트/앱 URL"]
|
|
85
|
+
},
|
|
86
|
+
"constraints": {
|
|
87
|
+
"accessibility": "AA | AAA",
|
|
88
|
+
"performance": "core-web-vitals | balanced | unlimited",
|
|
89
|
+
"browsers": ["chrome", "safari", "firefox", "edge"],
|
|
90
|
+
"devices": ["mobile", "tablet", "desktop"]
|
|
91
|
+
},
|
|
92
|
+
"detectedStack": {
|
|
93
|
+
"framework": "감지된 프레임워크",
|
|
94
|
+
"componentLibrary": "감지된 컴포넌트 라이브러리",
|
|
95
|
+
"styling": "감지된 스타일링 방식",
|
|
96
|
+
"fonts": ["감지된 폰트"]
|
|
97
|
+
}
|
|
98
|
+
}
|
|
99
|
+
```
|
|
100
|
+
|
|
101
|
+
> **Note**: `tone`, `style`, `colorMood`, `typographyMood` 값은 제안 값이며 closed enum이 아닙니다. 사용자가 자유 텍스트로 입력할 수 있습니다.
|
|
102
|
+
|
|
103
|
+
> **Size limit**: design-context.json은 10KB를 초과하지 않도록 합니다. `references` 배열은 최대 5개로 제한합니다.
|
|
104
|
+
|
|
105
|
+
### Step 4: Rerun Semantics
|
|
106
|
+
|
|
107
|
+
`design-context.json`이 이미 존재할 때 `/design-teach`를 다시 실행하면:
|
|
108
|
+
|
|
109
|
+
1. 기존 파일을 Read 도구로 읽음
|
|
110
|
+
2. 각 질문에 **기존 값을 기본값으로 표시** ("현재: professional, clean — 변경하시겠습니까?")
|
|
111
|
+
3. 사용자가 "keep" 또는 빈 답변 → 해당 필드 유지
|
|
112
|
+
4. 새 값 입력 → 해당 필드만 교체 (병합이 아닌 **필드 단위 교체**)
|
|
113
|
+
5. `createdAt`은 항상 보존, `updatedAt`만 현재 시각으로 갱신
|
|
114
|
+
|
|
115
|
+
### Step 5: Other Skills Reference This Context
|
|
116
|
+
|
|
117
|
+
각 design-* skill은 실행 시 다음을 수행:
|
|
118
|
+
|
|
119
|
+
```
|
|
120
|
+
1. Read `.claude/vibe/design-context.json`
|
|
121
|
+
2. 파일 없음 → "Run /design-teach first for better results" 안내 출력 → 기본값으로 계속 실행
|
|
122
|
+
3. 파싱 실패 (잘못된 JSON) → "design-context.json 파싱 실패" 경고 + 기본값으로 계속 → /design-teach 재실행 권장
|
|
123
|
+
4. 정상 → context를 분석 기준에 반영
|
|
124
|
+
```
|
|
125
|
+
|
|
126
|
+
## Design Workflow Integration
|
|
127
|
+
|
|
128
|
+
디자인 스킬은 vibe 워크플로우의 3개 Phase에 통합됩니다:
|
|
129
|
+
|
|
130
|
+
```
|
|
131
|
+
SPEC Phase:
|
|
132
|
+
① design-context.json 확인 (없으면 /design-teach 권장)
|
|
133
|
+
② ui-industry-analyzer → ui-design-system-gen → ui-layout-architect
|
|
134
|
+
|
|
135
|
+
REVIEW Phase:
|
|
136
|
+
③ /design-audit (기술 품질 점검)
|
|
137
|
+
④ /design-critique (UX 리뷰)
|
|
138
|
+
⑤ ui-antipattern-detector (AI slop + 패턴 탐지)
|
|
139
|
+
|
|
140
|
+
PRE-SHIP Phase:
|
|
141
|
+
⑥ /design-normalize (디자인 시스템 정렬)
|
|
142
|
+
⑦ /design-polish (최종 패스)
|
|
143
|
+
```
|
|
144
|
+
|
|
145
|
+
## How Other Skills Use This
|
|
146
|
+
|
|
147
|
+
| Skill | Context Usage |
|
|
148
|
+
|-------|---------------|
|
|
149
|
+
| `/design-audit` | Weight findings by audience constraints (a11y level, devices) |
|
|
150
|
+
| `/design-critique` | Adjust persona priorities by target audience |
|
|
151
|
+
| `/design-polish` | Apply brand-appropriate micro-interactions |
|
|
152
|
+
| `/design-normalize` | Use detected token system for replacement mapping |
|
|
153
|
+
| `/design-distill` | Preserve brand-expressive elements based on personality |
|
|
154
|
+
|
|
155
|
+
## Output Format
|
|
156
|
+
|
|
157
|
+
```markdown
|
|
158
|
+
## Design Context: {project}
|
|
159
|
+
|
|
160
|
+
### Auto-Detected
|
|
161
|
+
- Framework: Next.js 15
|
|
162
|
+
- Styling: Tailwind CSS + shadcn/ui
|
|
163
|
+
- Fonts: Inter (heading), Inter (body)
|
|
164
|
+
- Tokens: 24 CSS variables found
|
|
165
|
+
|
|
166
|
+
### User Provided
|
|
167
|
+
- Audience: B2B SaaS, mixed technical level
|
|
168
|
+
- Brand: Professional, clean (like Linear)
|
|
169
|
+
- Density: Balanced
|
|
170
|
+
- A11y: WCAG AA
|
|
171
|
+
- Dark mode: Required
|
|
172
|
+
|
|
173
|
+
### Saved
|
|
174
|
+
✅ .claude/vibe/design-context.json updated
|
|
175
|
+
```
|
|
176
|
+
|
|
177
|
+
## Important
|
|
178
|
+
|
|
179
|
+
- **Non-destructive**: Only creates/updates the context file. No code changes.
|
|
180
|
+
- **Incremental**: Running `--update` preserves existing answers, only asks about gaps.
|
|
181
|
+
- **Foundation**: Run this first before other design-* skills for best results.
|
|
@@ -3,6 +3,7 @@ name: exec-plan
|
|
|
3
3
|
description: "Convert SPEC into a self-contained execution plan that agents can run autonomously for hours. Use when a SPEC has 3+ phases, multiple files to change, or complex dependencies between tasks. Produces a plan with explicit file paths, interface extracts, and acceptance criteria so agents never need to 'figure out' context. Must use this skill when launching long-running autonomous work, parallelizing implementation across agents, or when user says 'execute this spec' or 'run this plan'."
|
|
4
4
|
triggers: [exec plan, execution plan, autonomous plan, self-contained plan, long-running]
|
|
5
5
|
priority: 70
|
|
6
|
+
chain-next: [commit-push-pr]
|
|
6
7
|
---
|
|
7
8
|
|
|
8
9
|
# ExecPlan — Self-Contained Execution Plan Generator
|
|
@@ -3,6 +3,7 @@ name: parallel-research
|
|
|
3
3
|
description: "Parallel research with 4 specialized agents (best-practices, framework-docs, codebase-patterns, security-advisory) running simultaneously. Use when facing unfamiliar technology, choosing between libraries/frameworks, designing architecture for a new feature, or investigating security implications. Must use this skill when user asks 'how should we build X', 'which library for Y', or when starting work on a complex feature with unknown requirements. Not for simple lookups — use web search directly for those."
|
|
4
4
|
triggers: [parallel research, complex feature, technology selection, architecture design, security critical]
|
|
5
5
|
priority: 60
|
|
6
|
+
chain-next: [exec-plan]
|
|
6
7
|
---
|
|
7
8
|
# Parallel Research
|
|
8
9
|
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,86 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
---
|
|
2
|
+
name: prioritization-frameworks
|
|
3
|
+
description: "Reference guide to 9 prioritization frameworks with formulas, when-to-use guidance, and templates — RICE, ICE, Kano, MoSCoW, Opportunity Score, and more."
|
|
4
|
+
triggers: [prioritize, prioritization, rice, ice, kano, moscow, opportunity score]
|
|
5
|
+
priority: 50
|
|
6
|
+
chain-next: [create-prd]
|
|
7
|
+
---
|
|
8
|
+
|
|
9
|
+
# Prioritization Frameworks Reference
|
|
10
|
+
|
|
11
|
+
> Based on the Product Frameworks Compendium from [Product Compass](https://www.productcompass.pm/p/the-product-frameworks-compendium) by Pawel Huryn (MIT License).
|
|
12
|
+
|
|
13
|
+
A reference guide to help you select and apply the right prioritization framework for your context.
|
|
14
|
+
|
|
15
|
+
## Core Principle
|
|
16
|
+
|
|
17
|
+
Never allow customers to design solutions. Prioritize **problems (opportunities)**, not features.
|
|
18
|
+
|
|
19
|
+
## Opportunity Score (Dan Olsen, *The Lean Product Playbook*)
|
|
20
|
+
|
|
21
|
+
The recommended framework for prioritizing customer problems.
|
|
22
|
+
|
|
23
|
+
Survey customers on **Importance** and **Satisfaction** for each need (normalize to 0-1 scale).
|
|
24
|
+
|
|
25
|
+
Three related formulas:
|
|
26
|
+
- **Current value** = Importance x Satisfaction
|
|
27
|
+
- **Opportunity Score** = Importance x (1 - Satisfaction)
|
|
28
|
+
- **Customer value created** = Importance x (S2 - S1), where S1 = satisfaction before, S2 = satisfaction after
|
|
29
|
+
|
|
30
|
+
High Importance + low Satisfaction = highest Opportunity Score = best opportunities. Plot on an Importance vs Satisfaction chart — upper-left quadrant is the sweet spot.
|
|
31
|
+
|
|
32
|
+
## ICE Framework
|
|
33
|
+
|
|
34
|
+
Useful for prioritizing initiatives and ideas. Considers not only value but also risk and economic factors.
|
|
35
|
+
|
|
36
|
+
- **I** (Impact) = Opportunity Score x Number of Customers affected
|
|
37
|
+
- **C** (Confidence) = How confident are we? (1-10). Accounts for risk.
|
|
38
|
+
- **E** (Ease) = How easy is it to implement? (1-10). Accounts for economic factors.
|
|
39
|
+
|
|
40
|
+
**Score** = I x C x E. Higher = prioritize first.
|
|
41
|
+
|
|
42
|
+
## RICE Framework
|
|
43
|
+
|
|
44
|
+
Splits ICE's Impact into two separate factors. Useful for larger teams that need more granularity.
|
|
45
|
+
|
|
46
|
+
- **R** (Reach) = Number of customers affected
|
|
47
|
+
- **I** (Impact) = Opportunity Score (value per customer)
|
|
48
|
+
- **C** (Confidence) = How confident are we? (0-100%)
|
|
49
|
+
- **E** (Effort) = How much effort to implement? (person-months)
|
|
50
|
+
|
|
51
|
+
**Score** = (R x I x C) / E
|
|
52
|
+
|
|
53
|
+
## 9 Frameworks Overview
|
|
54
|
+
|
|
55
|
+
| Framework | Best For | Key Insight |
|
|
56
|
+
|-----------|----------|-------------|
|
|
57
|
+
| Eisenhower Matrix | Personal tasks | Urgent vs Important — for individual PM task management |
|
|
58
|
+
| Impact vs Effort | Tasks/initiatives | Simple 2x2 — quick triage, not rigorous for strategic decisions |
|
|
59
|
+
| Risk vs Reward | Initiatives | Like Impact vs Effort but accounts for uncertainty |
|
|
60
|
+
| **Opportunity Score** | Customer problems | **Recommended.** Importance x (1 - Satisfaction). Normalize to 0-1. |
|
|
61
|
+
| Kano Model | Understanding expectations | Must-be, Performance, Attractive, Indifferent, Reverse. For understanding, not prioritizing. |
|
|
62
|
+
| Weighted Decision Matrix | Multi-factor decisions | Assign weights to criteria, score each option. Useful for stakeholder buy-in. |
|
|
63
|
+
| **ICE** | Ideas/initiatives | Impact x Confidence x Ease. Recommended for quick prioritization. |
|
|
64
|
+
| **RICE** | Ideas at scale | (Reach x Impact x Confidence) / Effort. Adds Reach to ICE. |
|
|
65
|
+
| MoSCoW | Requirements | Must/Should/Could/Won't. Caution: project management origin. |
|
|
66
|
+
|
|
67
|
+
## How to Choose
|
|
68
|
+
|
|
69
|
+
1. **Prioritizing customer problems?** → Opportunity Score
|
|
70
|
+
2. **Quick initiative ranking?** → ICE
|
|
71
|
+
3. **Large team with data?** → RICE
|
|
72
|
+
4. **Understanding user expectations?** → Kano Model
|
|
73
|
+
5. **Stakeholder alignment needed?** → Weighted Decision Matrix
|
|
74
|
+
6. **Requirements scoping?** → MoSCoW (with caution)
|
|
75
|
+
|
|
76
|
+
## Templates
|
|
77
|
+
|
|
78
|
+
- [Opportunity Score intro (PDF)](https://drive.google.com/file/d/1ENbYPmk1i1AKO7UnfyTuULL5GucTVufW/view)
|
|
79
|
+
- [Importance vs Satisfaction Template (Google Slides)](https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1jg-LuF_3QHsf6f1nE1f98i4C0aulnRNMOO1jftgti8M/edit#slide=id.g796641d975_0_3)
|
|
80
|
+
- [ICE Template (Google Sheets)](https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1LUfnsPolhZgm7X2oij-7EUe0CJT-Dwr-/edit?usp=share_link)
|
|
81
|
+
- [RICE Template (Google Sheets)](https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1S-6QpyOz5MCrV7B67LUWdZkAzn38Eahv/edit?usp=sharing)
|
|
82
|
+
|
|
83
|
+
## Further Reading
|
|
84
|
+
|
|
85
|
+
- [The Product Management Frameworks Compendium + Templates](https://www.productcompass.pm/p/the-product-frameworks-compendium)
|
|
86
|
+
- [Kano Model: How to Delight Your Customers Without Becoming a Feature Factory](https://www.productcompass.pm/p/kano-model-how-to-delight-your-customers)
|
package/skills/techdebt/SKILL.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -3,6 +3,7 @@ name: techdebt
|
|
|
3
3
|
description: "Technical debt cleanup — detect and fix duplicate code, console.log, unused imports, any types, etc. Recommended before session end. Activates on techdebt, cleanup, debt keywords."
|
|
4
4
|
triggers: [techdebt, cleanup, debt, unused imports, console.log, dead code]
|
|
5
5
|
priority: 60
|
|
6
|
+
chain-next: [commit-push-pr]
|
|
6
7
|
---
|
|
7
8
|
|
|
8
9
|
# Techdebt — Technical Debt Cleanup
|
|
@@ -211,6 +211,20 @@ Avoid these signs of generic, AI-generated UI:
|
|
|
211
211
|
| Safe, corporate color palettes | Develop unique color palettes beyond defaults |
|
|
212
212
|
| No micro-interactions | Add meaningful motion to guide user attention (150-300ms) |
|
|
213
213
|
|
|
214
|
+
## Deep Reference Guides
|
|
215
|
+
|
|
216
|
+
For detailed guidance on specific domains, see the reference files:
|
|
217
|
+
|
|
218
|
+
| Reference | Domain | Use When |
|
|
219
|
+
|-----------|--------|----------|
|
|
220
|
+
| [typography](reference/typography.md) | Type systems, font pairing, scales | Setting up type hierarchy |
|
|
221
|
+
| [color-and-contrast](reference/color-and-contrast.md) | OKLCH, tinted neutrals, dark mode | Choosing colors, dark mode |
|
|
222
|
+
| [spatial-design](reference/spatial-design.md) | Spacing systems, grids, hierarchy | Layout and spacing decisions |
|
|
223
|
+
| [motion-design](reference/motion-design.md) | Easing, staggering, reduced motion | Adding animations |
|
|
224
|
+
| [interaction-design](reference/interaction-design.md) | States, focus, forms, modals | Building interactive elements |
|
|
225
|
+
| [responsive-design](reference/responsive-design.md) | Mobile-first, fluid, containers | Responsive implementation |
|
|
226
|
+
| [ux-writing](reference/ux-writing.md) | Labels, errors, empty states | Writing UI copy |
|
|
227
|
+
|
|
214
228
|
## Done Criteria (K4)
|
|
215
229
|
|
|
216
230
|
- [ ] Design system generated before implementation
|