@su-record/vibe 2.7.2 → 2.7.5

package/vibe/rules/quality/testing-strategy.md

@@ -1,440 +1,440 @@
-# Testing Strategy for the AI Era
-
-## Core Principles
-
-```markdown
-✅ Single Responsibility (SRP)
-✅ Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY)
-✅ Reusability
-✅ Low Complexity
-✅ Contract-First Design
-```
-
-## Test Priorities in AI-Driven Development
-
-### 1. Contract Testing (Highest Priority) ⭐⭐⭐
-
-**Concept**: **Define contracts with types/schemas** before writing code
-
-**Reason**: Since AI implements following contracts, type safety is automatically guaranteed
-
-#### Python (Pydantic)
-
-```python
-# Contract definition (AI implements following this)
-from pydantic import BaseModel, Field, EmailStr
-
-class CreateUserRequest(BaseModel):
-    """User creation contract"""
-    email: EmailStr
-    username: str = Field(min_length=3, max_length=50)
-    password: str = Field(min_length=8)
-    age: int = Field(ge=0, le=150)
-
-class UserResponse(BaseModel):
-    """User response contract"""
-    id: str
-    email: str
-    username: str
-    created_at: str
-
-# AI cannot violate this contract (auto-validated)
-```
-
-#### TypeScript
-
-```typescript
-// Contract definition
-interface CreateUserRequest {
-  email: string;
-  username: string; // 3-50 chars
-  password: string; // min 8 chars
-  age: number; // 0-150
-}
-
-interface UserResponse {
-  id: string;
-  email: string;
-  username: string;
-  createdAt: string;
-}
-
-// Runtime validation with Zod
-import { z } from 'zod';
-
-const createUserSchema = z.object({
-  email: z.string().email(),
-  username: z.string().min(3).max(50),
-  password: z.string().min(8),
-  age: z.number().min(0).max(150),
-});
-```
-
-#### Dart (Flutter)
-
-```dart
-// Contract definition
-class CreateUserRequest {
-  const CreateUserRequest({
-    required this.email,
-    required this.username,
-    required this.password,
-    required this.age,
-  });
-
-  final String email;
-  final String username; // 3-50 chars
-  final String password; // min 8 chars
-  final int age; // 0-150
-
-  // JSON serialization (contract enforcement)
-  Map<String, dynamic> toJson() => {
-    'email': email,
-    'username': username,
-    'password': password,
-    'age': age,
-  };
-}
-```
-
-### 2. Integration Testing (High) ⭐⭐⭐
-
-**Concept**: **Test real scenarios** where multiple modules work together
-
-**Reason**: Discovers module interaction errors that AI may have missed
-
-```python
-# ✅ Integration test: Real business flow
-@pytest.mark.asyncio
-async def test_user_registration_flow():
-    """
-    Scenario: New user registration
-    1. Check email duplication
-    2. Create user
-    3. Send welcome email
-    4. Create default settings
-    """
-    # Given: New user information
-    request = CreateUserRequest(
-        email="new@example.com",
-        username="newuser",
-        password="password123",
-        age=25,
-    )
-
-    # When: Call registration API
-    response = await client.post("/api/users", json=request.dict())
-
-    # Then: User creation succeeds
-    assert response.status_code == 201
-    data = response.json()
-    assert data["email"] == "new@example.com"
-
-    # And: Welcome email sent
-    assert email_service.sent_count == 1
-
-    # And: Default settings created
-    settings = await get_user_settings(data["id"])
-    assert settings is not None
-```
-
-```typescript
-// ✅ Integration test: React component + API
-import { render, screen, waitFor } from '@testing-library/react';
-import userEvent from '@testing-library/user-event';
-import { UserRegistration } from './UserRegistration';
-
-test('user can register successfully', async () => {
-  // Given: Render registration form
-  render(<UserRegistration />);
-
-  // When: User fills form
-  await userEvent.type(screen.getByLabelText('Email'), 'new@example.com');
-  await userEvent.type(screen.getByLabelText('Username'), 'newuser');
-  await userEvent.type(screen.getByLabelText('Password'), 'password123');
-  await userEvent.click(screen.getByRole('button', { name: 'Sign Up' }));
-
-  // Then: Success message displayed
-  await waitFor(() => {
-    expect(screen.getByText('Welcome!')).toBeInTheDocument();
-  });
-});
-```
-
-### 3. Property-Based Testing (Medium) ⭐⭐
-
-**Concept**: **Automatically generate inputs** across entire input range to test
-
-**Reason**: Automatically discovers edge cases AI didn't think of
-
-```python
-# ✅ Property-based testing (Hypothesis)
-from hypothesis import given, strategies as st
-
-@given(
-    age=st.integers(min_value=0, max_value=150),
-    email=st.emails(),
-    username=st.text(min_size=3, max_size=50),
-)
-def test_user_creation_with_any_valid_input(age, email, username):
-    """User creation possible with any valid input"""
-    user = create_user(email=email, username=username, age=age)
-    assert user.age == age
-    assert user.email == email
-```
-
-```typescript
-// ✅ Property-based testing (fast-check)
-import fc from 'fast-check';
-
-test('discount calculation always returns valid percentage', () => {
-  fc.assert(
-    fc.property(
-      fc.float({ min: 0, max: 10000 }), // price
-      fc.float({ min: 0, max: 1 }), // discount rate
-      (price, rate) => {
-        const discount = calculateDiscount(price, rate);
-        return discount >= 0 && discount <= price;
-      }
-    )
-  );
-});
-```
-
-### 4. Unit Testing (Low, Selective) ⭐
-
-**Concept**: Test individual functions/methods
-
-**When to write**: **Only for complex business logic** selectively
-
-```python
-# ✅ Unit Test: Complex business rules
-def test_tier_selection_score_calculation():
-    """
-    Selection score calculation (complex weights)
-    - Feed ×1.15
-    - OCR ×1.2
-    - Likes ×1.0
-    - Bookmarks ×1.0
-    - Partnerships ×1.5
-    """
-    score = calculate_selection_score(
-        feeds=10,      # 10 × 1.15 = 11.5
-        ocr_count=5,   # 5 × 1.2 = 6
-        likes=20,      # 20 × 1.0 = 20
-        bookmarks=8,   # 8 × 1.0 = 8
-        partnerships=2, # 2 × 1.5 = 3
-    )
-    assert score == 48.5
-
-# ❌ Unnecessary Unit Test: Simple CRUD
-def test_get_user_by_id():
-    """Integration Test is sufficient"""
-    user = get_user("user-123")
-    assert user.id == "user-123"  # Meaningless
-```
-
-### 5. E2E Testing (Scenario Verification) ⭐⭐
-
-**Concept**: Test complete scenarios from user perspective
-
-**When**: Only selectively for major user flows
-
-```typescript
-// ✅ E2E Test: Playwright/Cypress
-test('user can complete full registration flow', async ({ page }) => {
-  // 1. Visit homepage
-  await page.goto('https://app.example.com');
-
-  // 2. Click sign up
-  await page.click('text=Sign Up');
-
-  // 3. Fill form
-  await page.fill('input[name="email"]', 'test@example.com');
-  await page.fill('input[name="username"]', 'testuser');
-  await page.fill('input[name="password"]', 'password123');
-
-  // 4. Submit
-  await page.click('button[type="submit"]');
-
-  // 5. Verify redirect to dashboard
-  await expect(page).toHaveURL('/dashboard');
-  await expect(page.locator('h1')).toContainText('Welcome, testuser!');
-});
-```
-
-## Test Priority Decision Tree
-
-```
-When developing new features:
-
-1. Did you define contracts?
-   No → Write contracts first (Pydantic/Zod/Dart class)
-   Yes → ⬇️
-
-2. Do multiple modules collaborate?
-   Yes → Write Integration Test ⭐⭐⭐
-   No → ⬇️
-
-3. Is it complex business logic? (complexity > 10)
-   Yes → Write Unit Test ⭐
-   No → ⬇️
-
-4. Is it a core user flow?
-   Yes → Write E2E Test ⭐⭐
-   No → Done ✅
-```
-
-## TDD Alternative for AI Era: ATDD (AI-Test-Driven Development)
-
-```markdown
-# New development flow
-
-1. **Clarify requirements** (Developer)
-   "Premium users get 10% discount"
-
-2. **Define contracts** (Developer)
-   interface DiscountRequest {
-     userId: string;
-     orderTotal: number;
-   }
-
-   interface DiscountResponse {
-     originalPrice: number;
-     discountedPrice: number;
-     discountRate: number;
-   }
-
-3. **Write test scenarios** (Developer or AI)
-   test('premium user gets 10% discount', () => {
-     // Given: Premium user, 100 order
-     // When: Calculate discount
-     // Then: 90 (10% discount)
-   })
-
-4. **AI implements** (AI)
-   - Generate code following contracts
-   - Write code that passes tests
-
-5. **Integration test** (Automated)
-   - Verify complete scenarios in CI/CD
-
-6. **Refactoring** (AI + Developer)
-   - Remove complexity, duplication
-   - Verify SRP compliance
-```
-
-## Language-specific Tools
-
-### Python
-
-```bash
-# Contract Testing
-pip install pydantic
-
-# Integration Testing
-pip install pytest pytest-asyncio httpx
-
-# Property-Based Testing
-pip install hypothesis
-
-# Coverage
-pip install pytest-cov
-```
-
-### TypeScript/JavaScript
-
-```bash
-# Contract Testing
-npm install zod
-
-# Integration Testing
-npm install @testing-library/react @testing-library/user-event
-
-# Property-Based Testing
-npm install fast-check
-
-# E2E Testing
-npm install playwright
-```
-
-### Dart/Flutter
-
-```bash
-# Integration Testing
-flutter pub add integration_test
-
-# Widget Testing
-flutter test
-
-# E2E Testing (Flutter Driver)
-flutter drive --target=test_driver/app.dart
-```
-
-## Anti-patterns
-
-```python
-# ❌ Testing implementation details (fragile)
-def test_internal_cache_structure():
-    service = UserService()
-    assert service._cache == {}  # Depends on internal implementation
-
-# ✅ Testing public API (robust)
-def test_user_data_is_cached_after_first_call():
-    service = UserService()
-    user1 = service.get_user("123")
-    user2 = service.get_user("123")
-    assert user1 is user2  # Only verify behavior
-```
-
-```typescript
-// ❌ Unit tests for every function (excessive)
-test('add function adds two numbers', () => {
-  expect(add(1, 2)).toBe(3);  // Meaningless
-});
-
-// ✅ Only test complex logic
-test('calculate shipping cost with multiple conditions', () => {
-  const cost = calculateShipping({
-    weight: 10,
-    distance: 500,
-    isPremium: true,
-    isExpress: false,
-  });
-  expect(cost).toBe(45);  // Verify complex rules
-});
-```
-
-## Test Coverage Goals
-
-```markdown
-# Realistic goals
-
-- Contract Coverage: 100% (All APIs have schema definitions)
-- Integration Coverage: 80% (Major business flows)
-- Unit Coverage: Selective (Complex logic only)
-- E2E Coverage: 20-30% (Core user flows)
-
-# ❌ Avoid
-- 100% Unit Test Coverage (waste of time)
-- Unit Tests for simple CRUD (Integration is sufficient)
-- Manual testing all edge cases (use Property-based)
-```
-
-## Key Summary
-
-```markdown
-AI Era Testing Strategy:
-
-1. ✅ Contract-First (types/schemas first)
-2. ✅ Integration Testing (real scenarios)
-3. ⚠️ Unit Testing (complex logic only)
-4. ❌ Traditional TDD (inefficient in AI era)
-
-Goals:
-- Single Responsibility (SRP)
-- No Duplication (DRY)
-- Reusability
-- Low Complexity
-- Fast Feedback
-```
+# Testing Strategy for the AI Era
+
+## Core Principles
+
+```markdown
+✅ Single Responsibility (SRP)
+✅ Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY)
+✅ Reusability
+✅ Low Complexity
+✅ Contract-First Design
+```
+
+## Test Priorities in AI-Driven Development
+
+### 1. Contract Testing (Highest Priority) ⭐⭐⭐
+
+**Concept**: **Define contracts with types/schemas** before writing code
+
+**Reason**: Since AI implements following contracts, type safety is automatically guaranteed
+
+#### Python (Pydantic)
+
+```python
+# Contract definition (AI implements following this)
+from pydantic import BaseModel, Field, EmailStr
+
+class CreateUserRequest(BaseModel):
+    """User creation contract"""
+    email: EmailStr
+    username: str = Field(min_length=3, max_length=50)
+    password: str = Field(min_length=8)
+    age: int = Field(ge=0, le=150)
+
+class UserResponse(BaseModel):
+    """User response contract"""
+    id: str
+    email: str
+    username: str
+    created_at: str
+
+# AI cannot violate this contract (auto-validated)
+```
+
+#### TypeScript
+
+```typescript
+// Contract definition
+interface CreateUserRequest {
+  email: string;
+  username: string; // 3-50 chars
+  password: string; // min 8 chars
+  age: number; // 0-150
+}
+
+interface UserResponse {
+  id: string;
+  email: string;
+  username: string;
+  createdAt: string;
+}
+
+// Runtime validation with Zod
+import { z } from 'zod';
+
+const createUserSchema = z.object({
+  email: z.string().email(),
+  username: z.string().min(3).max(50),
+  password: z.string().min(8),
+  age: z.number().min(0).max(150),
+});
+```
+
+#### Dart (Flutter)
+
+```dart
+// Contract definition
+class CreateUserRequest {
+  const CreateUserRequest({
+    required this.email,
+    required this.username,
+    required this.password,
+    required this.age,
+  });
+
+  final String email;
+  final String username; // 3-50 chars
+  final String password; // min 8 chars
+  final int age; // 0-150
+
+  // JSON serialization (contract enforcement)
+  Map<String, dynamic> toJson() => {
+    'email': email,
+    'username': username,
+    'password': password,
+    'age': age,
+  };
+}
+```
+
+### 2. Integration Testing (High) ⭐⭐⭐
+
+**Concept**: **Test real scenarios** where multiple modules work together
+
+**Reason**: Discovers module interaction errors that AI may have missed
+
+```python
+# ✅ Integration test: Real business flow
+@pytest.mark.asyncio
+async def test_user_registration_flow():
+    """
+    Scenario: New user registration
+    1. Check email duplication
+    2. Create user
+    3. Send welcome email
+    4. Create default settings
+    """
+    # Given: New user information
+    request = CreateUserRequest(
+        email="new@example.com",
+        username="newuser",
+        password="password123",
+        age=25,
+    )
+
+    # When: Call registration API
+    response = await client.post("/api/users", json=request.dict())
+
+    # Then: User creation succeeds
+    assert response.status_code == 201
+    data = response.json()
+    assert data["email"] == "new@example.com"
+
+    # And: Welcome email sent
+    assert email_service.sent_count == 1
+
+    # And: Default settings created
+    settings = await get_user_settings(data["id"])
+    assert settings is not None
+```
+
+```typescript
+// ✅ Integration test: React component + API
+import { render, screen, waitFor } from '@testing-library/react';
+import userEvent from '@testing-library/user-event';
+import { UserRegistration } from './UserRegistration';
+
+test('user can register successfully', async () => {
+  // Given: Render registration form
+  render(<UserRegistration />);
+
+  // When: User fills form
+  await userEvent.type(screen.getByLabelText('Email'), 'new@example.com');
+  await userEvent.type(screen.getByLabelText('Username'), 'newuser');
+  await userEvent.type(screen.getByLabelText('Password'), 'password123');
+  await userEvent.click(screen.getByRole('button', { name: 'Sign Up' }));
+
+  // Then: Success message displayed
+  await waitFor(() => {
+    expect(screen.getByText('Welcome!')).toBeInTheDocument();
+  });
+});
+```
+
+### 3. Property-Based Testing (Medium) ⭐⭐
+
+**Concept**: **Automatically generate inputs** across entire input range to test
+
+**Reason**: Automatically discovers edge cases AI didn't think of
+
+```python
+# ✅ Property-based testing (Hypothesis)
+from hypothesis import given, strategies as st
+
+@given(
+    age=st.integers(min_value=0, max_value=150),
+    email=st.emails(),
+    username=st.text(min_size=3, max_size=50),
+)
+def test_user_creation_with_any_valid_input(age, email, username):
+    """User creation possible with any valid input"""
+    user = create_user(email=email, username=username, age=age)
+    assert user.age == age
+    assert user.email == email
+```
+
+```typescript
+// ✅ Property-based testing (fast-check)
+import fc from 'fast-check';
+
+test('discount calculation always returns valid percentage', () => {
+  fc.assert(
+    fc.property(
+      fc.float({ min: 0, max: 10000 }), // price
+      fc.float({ min: 0, max: 1 }), // discount rate
+      (price, rate) => {
+        const discount = calculateDiscount(price, rate);
+        return discount >= 0 && discount <= price;
+      }
+    )
+  );
+});
+```
+
+### 4. Unit Testing (Low, Selective) ⭐
+
+**Concept**: Test individual functions/methods
+
+**When to write**: **Only for complex business logic** selectively
+
+```python
+# ✅ Unit Test: Complex business rules
+def test_tier_selection_score_calculation():
+    """
+    Selection score calculation (complex weights)
+    - Feed ×1.15
+    - OCR ×1.2
+    - Likes ×1.0
+    - Bookmarks ×1.0
+    - Partnerships ×1.5
+    """
+    score = calculate_selection_score(
+        feeds=10,      # 10 × 1.15 = 11.5
+        ocr_count=5,   # 5 × 1.2 = 6
+        likes=20,      # 20 × 1.0 = 20
+        bookmarks=8,   # 8 × 1.0 = 8
+        partnerships=2, # 2 × 1.5 = 3
+    )
+    assert score == 48.5
+
+# ❌ Unnecessary Unit Test: Simple CRUD
+def test_get_user_by_id():
+    """Integration Test is sufficient"""
+    user = get_user("user-123")
+    assert user.id == "user-123"  # Meaningless
+```
+
+### 5. E2E Testing (Scenario Verification) ⭐⭐
+
+**Concept**: Test complete scenarios from user perspective
+
+**When**: Only selectively for major user flows
+
+```typescript
+// ✅ E2E Test: Playwright/Cypress
+test('user can complete full registration flow', async ({ page }) => {
+  // 1. Visit homepage
+  await page.goto('https://app.example.com');
+
+  // 2. Click sign up
+  await page.click('text=Sign Up');
+
+  // 3. Fill form
+  await page.fill('input[name="email"]', 'test@example.com');
+  await page.fill('input[name="username"]', 'testuser');
+  await page.fill('input[name="password"]', 'password123');
+
+  // 4. Submit
+  await page.click('button[type="submit"]');
+
+  // 5. Verify redirect to dashboard
+  await expect(page).toHaveURL('/dashboard');
+  await expect(page.locator('h1')).toContainText('Welcome, testuser!');
+});
+```
+
+## Test Priority Decision Tree
+
+```
+When developing new features:
+
+1. Did you define contracts?
+   No → Write contracts first (Pydantic/Zod/Dart class)
+   Yes → ⬇️
+
+2. Do multiple modules collaborate?
+   Yes → Write Integration Test ⭐⭐⭐
+   No → ⬇️
+
+3. Is it complex business logic? (complexity > 10)
+   Yes → Write Unit Test ⭐
+   No → ⬇️
+
+4. Is it a core user flow?
+   Yes → Write E2E Test ⭐⭐
+   No → Done ✅
+```
+
+## TDD Alternative for AI Era: ATDD (AI-Test-Driven Development)
+
+```markdown
+# New development flow
+
+1. **Clarify requirements** (Developer)
+   "Premium users get 10% discount"
+
+2. **Define contracts** (Developer)
+   interface DiscountRequest {
+     userId: string;
+     orderTotal: number;
+   }
+
+   interface DiscountResponse {
+     originalPrice: number;
+     discountedPrice: number;
+     discountRate: number;
+   }
+
+3. **Write test scenarios** (Developer or AI)
+   test('premium user gets 10% discount', () => {
+     // Given: Premium user, 100 order
+     // When: Calculate discount
+     // Then: 90 (10% discount)
+   })
+
+4. **AI implements** (AI)
+   - Generate code following contracts
+   - Write code that passes tests
+
+5. **Integration test** (Automated)
+   - Verify complete scenarios in CI/CD
+
+6. **Refactoring** (AI + Developer)
+   - Remove complexity, duplication
+   - Verify SRP compliance
+```
+
+## Language-specific Tools
+
+### Python
+
+```bash
+# Contract Testing
+pip install pydantic
+
+# Integration Testing
+pip install pytest pytest-asyncio httpx
+
+# Property-Based Testing
+pip install hypothesis
+
+# Coverage
+pip install pytest-cov
+```
+
+### TypeScript/JavaScript
+
+```bash
+# Contract Testing
+npm install zod
+
+# Integration Testing
+npm install @testing-library/react @testing-library/user-event
+
+# Property-Based Testing
+npm install fast-check
+
+# E2E Testing
+npm install playwright
+```
+
+### Dart/Flutter
+
+```bash
+# Integration Testing
+flutter pub add integration_test
+
+# Widget Testing
+flutter test
+
+# E2E Testing (Flutter Driver)
+flutter drive --target=test_driver/app.dart
+```
+
+## Anti-patterns
+
+```python
+# ❌ Testing implementation details (fragile)
+def test_internal_cache_structure():
+    service = UserService()
+    assert service._cache == {}  # Depends on internal implementation
+
+# ✅ Testing public API (robust)
+def test_user_data_is_cached_after_first_call():
+    service = UserService()
+    user1 = service.get_user("123")
+    user2 = service.get_user("123")
+    assert user1 is user2  # Only verify behavior
+```
+
+```typescript
+// ❌ Unit tests for every function (excessive)
+test('add function adds two numbers', () => {
+  expect(add(1, 2)).toBe(3);  // Meaningless
+});
+
+// ✅ Only test complex logic
+test('calculate shipping cost with multiple conditions', () => {
+  const cost = calculateShipping({
+    weight: 10,
+    distance: 500,
+    isPremium: true,
+    isExpress: false,
+  });
+  expect(cost).toBe(45);  // Verify complex rules
+});
+```
+
+## Test Coverage Goals
+
+```markdown
+# Realistic goals
+
+- Contract Coverage: 100% (All APIs have schema definitions)
+- Integration Coverage: 80% (Major business flows)
+- Unit Coverage: Selective (Complex logic only)
+- E2E Coverage: 20-30% (Core user flows)
+
+# ❌ Avoid
+- 100% Unit Test Coverage (waste of time)
+- Unit Tests for simple CRUD (Integration is sufficient)
+- Manual testing all edge cases (use Property-based)
+```
+
+## Key Summary
+
+```markdown
+AI Era Testing Strategy:
+
+1. ✅ Contract-First (types/schemas first)
+2. ✅ Integration Testing (real scenarios)
+3. ⚠️ Unit Testing (complex logic only)
+4. ❌ Traditional TDD (inefficient in AI era)
+
+Goals:
+- Single Responsibility (SRP)
+- No Duplication (DRY)
+- Reusability
+- Low Complexity
+- Fast Feedback
+```