@su-record/vibe 2.7.16 → 2.7.18
This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
- package/.env.example +37 -37
- package/CLAUDE.md +153 -134
- package/LICENSE +21 -21
- package/README.md +449 -449
- package/agents/architect-low.md +41 -41
- package/agents/architect-medium.md +59 -59
- package/agents/architect.md +80 -80
- package/agents/build-error-resolver.md +115 -115
- package/agents/compounder.md +261 -261
- package/agents/diagrammer.md +178 -178
- package/agents/docs/api-documenter.md +99 -99
- package/agents/docs/changelog-writer.md +93 -93
- package/agents/e2e-tester.md +294 -294
- package/agents/explorer-low.md +42 -42
- package/agents/explorer-medium.md +59 -59
- package/agents/explorer.md +48 -48
- package/agents/implementer-low.md +43 -43
- package/agents/implementer-medium.md +52 -52
- package/agents/implementer.md +54 -54
- package/agents/junior-mentor.md +141 -141
- package/agents/planning/requirements-analyst.md +84 -84
- package/agents/planning/ux-advisor.md +83 -83
- package/agents/qa/acceptance-tester.md +86 -86
- package/agents/qa/edge-case-finder.md +93 -93
- package/agents/refactor-cleaner.md +143 -143
- package/agents/research/best-practices-agent.md +199 -199
- package/agents/research/codebase-patterns-agent.md +157 -157
- package/agents/research/framework-docs-agent.md +188 -188
- package/agents/research/security-advisory-agent.md +213 -213
- package/agents/review/architecture-reviewer.md +107 -107
- package/agents/review/complexity-reviewer.md +116 -116
- package/agents/review/data-integrity-reviewer.md +88 -88
- package/agents/review/git-history-reviewer.md +103 -103
- package/agents/review/performance-reviewer.md +86 -86
- package/agents/review/python-reviewer.md +150 -150
- package/agents/review/rails-reviewer.md +139 -139
- package/agents/review/react-reviewer.md +144 -144
- package/agents/review/security-reviewer.md +80 -80
- package/agents/review/simplicity-reviewer.md +140 -140
- package/agents/review/test-coverage-reviewer.md +116 -116
- package/agents/review/typescript-reviewer.md +127 -127
- package/agents/searcher.md +54 -54
- package/agents/simplifier.md +120 -120
- package/agents/tester.md +49 -49
- package/agents/ui/ui-a11y-auditor.md +93 -93
- package/agents/ui/ui-antipattern-detector.md +94 -94
- package/agents/ui/ui-dataviz-advisor.md +69 -69
- package/agents/ui/ui-design-system-gen.md +57 -57
- package/agents/ui/ui-industry-analyzer.md +49 -49
- package/agents/ui/ui-layout-architect.md +65 -65
- package/agents/ui/ui-stack-implementer.md +68 -68
- package/agents/ui/ux-compliance-reviewer.md +81 -81
- package/agents/ui-previewer.md +258 -258
- package/commands/vibe.analyze.md +379 -379
- package/commands/vibe.review.md +607 -607
- package/commands/vibe.run.md +2124 -2124
- package/commands/vibe.spec.md +1195 -1195
- package/commands/vibe.spec.review.md +569 -569
- package/commands/vibe.utils.md +413 -413
- package/commands/vibe.verify.md +484 -484
- package/dist/cli/collaborator.js +52 -52
- package/dist/cli/commands/evolution.js +12 -12
- package/dist/cli/commands/info.js +51 -51
- package/dist/cli/commands/init.js +5 -5
- package/dist/cli/commands/remove.js +14 -14
- package/dist/cli/commands/sentinel.js +27 -27
- package/dist/cli/commands/skills.js +5 -5
- package/dist/cli/commands/slack.js +10 -10
- package/dist/cli/commands/telegram.js +12 -12
- package/dist/cli/commands/upgrade.d.ts +3 -3
- package/dist/cli/commands/upgrade.d.ts.map +1 -1
- package/dist/cli/commands/upgrade.js +24 -3
- package/dist/cli/commands/upgrade.js.map +1 -1
- package/dist/cli/detect.js +32 -32
- package/dist/cli/index.js +51 -51
- package/dist/cli/llm/claude-commands.js +16 -16
- package/dist/cli/llm/config.js +18 -18
- package/dist/cli/llm/gemini-commands.js +16 -16
- package/dist/cli/llm/gpt-commands.js +19 -19
- package/dist/cli/llm/help.js +21 -21
- package/dist/cli/postinstall/cursor-agents.js +32 -32
- package/dist/cli/postinstall/cursor-rules.js +83 -83
- package/dist/cli/postinstall/cursor-skills.js +743 -743
- package/dist/cli/setup/Provisioner.js +42 -42
- package/dist/infra/lib/DeepInit.js +24 -24
- package/dist/infra/lib/IterationTracker.js +11 -11
- package/dist/infra/lib/PythonParser.js +108 -108
- package/dist/infra/lib/ReviewRace.js +96 -96
- package/dist/infra/lib/SkillFrontmatter.js +28 -28
- package/dist/infra/lib/SkillQualityGate.js +9 -9
- package/dist/infra/lib/SkillRepository.js +159 -159
- package/dist/infra/lib/UltraQA.js +99 -99
- package/dist/infra/lib/autonomy/AuditStore.js +41 -41
- package/dist/infra/lib/autonomy/ConfirmationStore.js +30 -30
- package/dist/infra/lib/autonomy/EventOutbox.js +38 -38
- package/dist/infra/lib/autonomy/PolicyEngine.js +18 -18
- package/dist/infra/lib/autonomy/SecuritySentinel.js +1 -1
- package/dist/infra/lib/autonomy/SuggestionStore.js +33 -33
- package/dist/infra/lib/embedding/VectorStore.js +22 -22
- package/dist/infra/lib/evolution/AgentAnalyzer.js +10 -10
- package/dist/infra/lib/evolution/DescriptionOptimizer.js +21 -21
- package/dist/infra/lib/evolution/GenerationRegistry.js +36 -36
- package/dist/infra/lib/evolution/InsightStore.js +90 -90
- package/dist/infra/lib/evolution/RollbackManager.js +5 -5
- package/dist/infra/lib/evolution/SkillBenchmark.js +23 -23
- package/dist/infra/lib/evolution/SkillEvalRunner.js +50 -50
- package/dist/infra/lib/evolution/SkillGapDetector.js +10 -10
- package/dist/infra/lib/evolution/UsageTracker.js +28 -28
- package/dist/infra/lib/gemini/orchestration.js +5 -5
- package/dist/infra/lib/gpt/orchestration.js +4 -4
- package/dist/infra/lib/memory/KnowledgeGraph.js +4 -4
- package/dist/infra/lib/memory/MemorySearch.js +57 -57
- package/dist/infra/lib/memory/MemoryStorage.js +181 -181
- package/dist/infra/lib/memory/ObservationStore.js +28 -28
- package/dist/infra/lib/memory/ReflectionStore.js +30 -30
- package/dist/infra/lib/memory/SessionRAGRetriever.js +7 -7
- package/dist/infra/lib/memory/SessionRAGStore.js +225 -225
- package/dist/infra/lib/memory/SessionSummarizer.js +9 -9
- package/dist/infra/lib/telemetry/SkillTelemetry.d.ts +52 -0
- package/dist/infra/lib/telemetry/SkillTelemetry.d.ts.map +1 -0
- package/dist/infra/lib/telemetry/SkillTelemetry.js +117 -0
- package/dist/infra/lib/telemetry/SkillTelemetry.js.map +1 -0
- package/dist/infra/lib/telemetry/SkillTelemetry.test.d.ts +2 -0
- package/dist/infra/lib/telemetry/SkillTelemetry.test.d.ts.map +1 -0
- package/dist/infra/lib/telemetry/SkillTelemetry.test.js +91 -0
- package/dist/infra/lib/telemetry/SkillTelemetry.test.js.map +1 -0
- package/dist/infra/orchestrator/AgentManager.js +12 -12
- package/dist/infra/orchestrator/AgentRegistry.js +65 -65
- package/dist/infra/orchestrator/MultiLlmResearch.js +8 -8
- package/dist/infra/orchestrator/SwarmOrchestrator.test.js +16 -16
- package/dist/infra/orchestrator/parallelResearch.js +24 -24
- package/dist/test-helpers/index.d.ts +36 -0
- package/dist/test-helpers/index.d.ts.map +1 -0
- package/dist/test-helpers/index.js +85 -0
- package/dist/test-helpers/index.js.map +1 -0
- package/dist/test-helpers/index.test.d.ts +2 -0
- package/dist/test-helpers/index.test.d.ts.map +1 -0
- package/dist/test-helpers/index.test.js +92 -0
- package/dist/test-helpers/index.test.js.map +1 -0
- package/dist/tools/convention/analyzeComplexity.test.js +115 -115
- package/dist/tools/convention/validateCodeQuality.test.js +104 -104
- package/dist/tools/memory/createMemoryTimeline.js +10 -10
- package/dist/tools/memory/getMemoryGraph.js +12 -12
- package/dist/tools/memory/getSessionContext.js +9 -9
- package/dist/tools/memory/linkMemories.js +14 -14
- package/dist/tools/memory/listMemories.js +4 -4
- package/dist/tools/memory/recallMemory.js +4 -4
- package/dist/tools/memory/saveMemory.js +4 -4
- package/dist/tools/memory/searchMemoriesAdvanced.js +23 -23
- package/dist/tools/semantic/analyzeDependencyGraph.js +12 -12
- package/dist/tools/semantic/astGrep.test.js +6 -6
- package/dist/tools/spec/prdParser.test.js +171 -171
- package/dist/tools/spec/specGenerator.js +169 -169
- package/dist/tools/spec/traceabilityMatrix.js +64 -64
- package/dist/tools/spec/traceabilityMatrix.test.js +28 -28
- package/hooks/gemini-hooks.json +73 -73
- package/hooks/hooks.json +137 -137
- package/hooks/scripts/code-check.js +77 -77
- package/hooks/scripts/context-save.js +212 -212
- package/hooks/scripts/hud-status.js +291 -291
- package/hooks/scripts/keyword-detector.js +214 -214
- package/hooks/scripts/llm-orchestrate.js +475 -475
- package/hooks/scripts/post-edit.js +32 -32
- package/hooks/scripts/pre-tool-guard.js +125 -125
- package/hooks/scripts/prompt-dispatcher.js +185 -185
- package/hooks/scripts/sentinel-guard.js +104 -104
- package/hooks/scripts/session-start.js +106 -106
- package/hooks/scripts/stop-notify.js +209 -209
- package/hooks/scripts/utils.js +100 -100
- package/languages/csharp-unity.md +515 -515
- package/languages/gdscript-godot.md +470 -470
- package/languages/ruby-rails.md +489 -489
- package/languages/typescript-angular.md +433 -433
- package/languages/typescript-astro.md +416 -416
- package/languages/typescript-electron.md +406 -406
- package/languages/typescript-nestjs.md +524 -524
- package/languages/typescript-svelte.md +407 -407
- package/languages/typescript-tauri.md +365 -365
- package/package.json +123 -121
- package/skills/agents-md/SKILL.md +120 -120
- package/skills/arch-guard/SKILL.md +180 -180
- package/skills/brand-assets/SKILL.md +146 -146
- package/skills/capability-loop/SKILL.md +167 -167
- package/skills/characterization-test/SKILL.md +206 -206
- package/skills/commerce-patterns/SKILL.md +63 -63
- package/skills/commit-push-pr/SKILL.md +75 -75
- package/skills/context7-usage/SKILL.md +105 -105
- package/skills/core-capabilities/SKILL.md +13 -13
- package/skills/e2e-commerce/SKILL.md +61 -61
- package/skills/exec-plan/SKILL.md +147 -147
- package/skills/frontend-design/SKILL.md +12 -12
- package/skills/git-worktree/SKILL.md +72 -72
- package/skills/handoff/SKILL.md +109 -109
- package/skills/parallel-research/SKILL.md +87 -87
- package/skills/priority-todos/SKILL.md +63 -63
- package/skills/seo-checklist/SKILL.md +57 -57
- package/skills/techdebt/SKILL.md +122 -122
- package/skills/tool-fallback/SKILL.md +103 -103
- package/skills/typescript-advanced-types/SKILL.md +66 -66
- package/skills/ui-ux-pro-max/SKILL.md +221 -221
- package/skills/vercel-react-best-practices/SKILL.md +59 -59
- package/skills/video-production/SKILL.md +51 -51
- package/vibe/config.json +29 -29
- package/vibe/constitution.md +227 -227
- package/vibe/rules/principles/communication-guide.md +98 -98
- package/vibe/rules/principles/development-philosophy.md +52 -52
- package/vibe/rules/principles/quick-start.md +102 -102
- package/vibe/rules/quality/bdd-contract-testing.md +393 -393
- package/vibe/rules/quality/checklist.md +276 -276
- package/vibe/rules/quality/performance.md +236 -236
- package/vibe/rules/quality/testing-strategy.md +440 -440
- package/vibe/rules/standards/anti-patterns.md +541 -541
- package/vibe/rules/standards/code-structure.md +291 -291
- package/vibe/rules/standards/complexity-metrics.md +313 -313
- package/vibe/rules/standards/git-workflow.md +237 -237
- package/vibe/rules/standards/naming-conventions.md +198 -198
- package/vibe/rules/standards/security.md +305 -305
- package/vibe/rules/writing/document-style.md +74 -74
- package/vibe/setup.sh +31 -31
- package/vibe/templates/constitution-template.md +252 -252
- package/vibe/templates/contract-backend-template.md +526 -526
- package/vibe/templates/contract-frontend-template.md +599 -599
- package/vibe/templates/feature-template.md +96 -96
- package/vibe/templates/spec-template.md +221 -221
- package/vibe/ui-ux-data/charts.csv +26 -26
- package/vibe/ui-ux-data/colors.csv +97 -97
- package/vibe/ui-ux-data/icons.csv +101 -101
- package/vibe/ui-ux-data/landing.csv +31 -31
- package/vibe/ui-ux-data/products.csv +96 -96
- package/vibe/ui-ux-data/react-performance.csv +45 -45
- package/vibe/ui-ux-data/stacks/astro.csv +54 -54
- package/vibe/ui-ux-data/stacks/flutter.csv +53 -53
- package/vibe/ui-ux-data/stacks/html-tailwind.csv +56 -56
- package/vibe/ui-ux-data/stacks/jetpack-compose.csv +53 -53
- package/vibe/ui-ux-data/stacks/nextjs.csv +53 -53
- package/vibe/ui-ux-data/stacks/nuxt-ui.csv +51 -51
- package/vibe/ui-ux-data/stacks/nuxtjs.csv +59 -59
- package/vibe/ui-ux-data/stacks/react-native.csv +52 -52
- package/vibe/ui-ux-data/stacks/react.csv +54 -54
- package/vibe/ui-ux-data/stacks/shadcn.csv +61 -61
- package/vibe/ui-ux-data/stacks/svelte.csv +54 -54
- package/vibe/ui-ux-data/stacks/swiftui.csv +51 -51
- package/vibe/ui-ux-data/stacks/vue.csv +50 -50
- package/vibe/ui-ux-data/styles.csv +68 -68
- package/vibe/ui-ux-data/typography.csv +57 -57
- package/vibe/ui-ux-data/ui-reasoning.csv +101 -101
- package/vibe/ui-ux-data/ux-guidelines.csv +99 -99
- package/vibe/ui-ux-data/version.json +31 -31
- package/vibe/ui-ux-data/web-interface.csv +31 -31
package/commands/vibe.verify.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -1,484 +1,484 @@
|
|
|
1
|
-
---
|
|
2
|
-
description: Verify implementation against SPEC requirements
|
|
3
|
-
argument-hint: "feature name"
|
|
4
|
-
---
|
|
5
|
-
|
|
6
|
-
# /vibe.verify
|
|
7
|
-
|
|
8
|
-
**Automated Quality Verification** - Making quality trustworthy even for non-developers.
|
|
9
|
-
|
|
10
|
-
> All scenarios passed = Quality assured
|
|
11
|
-
|
|
12
|
-
## Usage
|
|
13
|
-
|
|
14
|
-
```
|
|
15
|
-
/vibe.verify "feature-name" # SPEC-based verification
|
|
16
|
-
/vibe.verify --e2e "feature-name" # E2E browser test (agents/e2e-tester.md)
|
|
17
|
-
/vibe.verify --e2e --visual # Visual regression test
|
|
18
|
-
/vibe.verify --e2e --record # Video recording
|
|
19
|
-
```
|
|
20
|
-
|
|
21
|
-
> **⏱️ Timer**: Call `getCurrentTime` tool at the START. Record the result as `{start_time}`.
|
|
22
|
-
|
|
23
|
-
## File Reading Policy (Mandatory)
|
|
24
|
-
|
|
25
|
-
- **SPEC/Feature 파일**: 반드시 `Read` 도구로 전체 파일을 읽을 것 (Grep 금지)
|
|
26
|
-
- **소스코드 파일**: 검증 대상 파일은 반드시 `Read` 도구로 전체 읽은 후 검증할 것
|
|
27
|
-
- **Grep 사용 제한**: 파일 위치 탐색(어떤 파일에 있는지 찾기)에만 사용. 파일 내용 파악에는 반드시 Read 사용
|
|
28
|
-
- **시나리오 검증 시**: Given/When/Then 각 단계의 구현 코드를 Read로 전체 읽어 확인할 것. Grep 매칭만으로 "구현됨"이라 판단 금지
|
|
29
|
-
- **부분 읽기 금지**: Grep 결과의 주변 몇 줄만 보고 판단하지 말 것. 전체 맥락을 파악해야 정확한 검증 가능
|
|
30
|
-
|
|
31
|
-
## Core Principles
|
|
32
|
-
|
|
33
|
-
```
|
|
34
|
-
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
|
|
35
|
-
│ What non-developers need to know │
|
|
36
|
-
│ │
|
|
37
|
-
│ ✅ Scenarios: 4/4 passed │
|
|
38
|
-
│ 📈 Quality Score: 94/100 │
|
|
39
|
-
│ │
|
|
40
|
-
│ Just look at this. The system handles the rest. │
|
|
41
|
-
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
|
|
42
|
-
```
|
|
43
|
-
|
|
44
|
-
## Process
|
|
45
|
-
|
|
46
|
-
### 1. Load Feature File
|
|
47
|
-
|
|
48
|
-
**Search order (check BOTH file AND folder):**
|
|
49
|
-
|
|
50
|
-
```
|
|
51
|
-
Step 1: Check if SPLIT structure exists (folder)
|
|
52
|
-
📁 .claude/vibe/features/{feature-name}/ → Folder with _index.feature + phase files
|
|
53
|
-
📁 .claude/vibe/specs/{feature-name}/ → Folder with _index.md + phase files
|
|
54
|
-
|
|
55
|
-
Step 2: If no folder, check single file
|
|
56
|
-
📄 .claude/vibe/features/{feature-name}.feature → Single Feature file
|
|
57
|
-
📄 .claude/vibe/specs/{feature-name}.md → Single SPEC file
|
|
58
|
-
|
|
59
|
-
Step 3: If neither exists → Error
|
|
60
|
-
```
|
|
61
|
-
|
|
62
|
-
**Split structure (folder) detected:**
|
|
63
|
-
```
|
|
64
|
-
📁 .claude/vibe/features/{feature-name}/
|
|
65
|
-
├── _index.feature → Master Feature (read first for scenario overview)
|
|
66
|
-
├── phase-1-{name}.feature → Phase 1 scenarios
|
|
67
|
-
├── phase-2-{name}.feature → Phase 2 scenarios
|
|
68
|
-
└── ...
|
|
69
|
-
|
|
70
|
-
📁 .claude/vibe/specs/{feature-name}/
|
|
71
|
-
├── _index.md → Master SPEC (read first for overview)
|
|
72
|
-
├── phase-1-{name}.md → Phase 1 SPEC
|
|
73
|
-
└── ...
|
|
74
|
-
|
|
75
|
-
→ Load _index files first, then verify phase by phase
|
|
76
|
-
```
|
|
77
|
-
|
|
78
|
-
**Single file detected:**
|
|
79
|
-
```
|
|
80
|
-
📄 .claude/vibe/features/{feature-name}.feature → Scenario list
|
|
81
|
-
📄 .claude/vibe/specs/{feature-name}.md → Verification criteria (reference)
|
|
82
|
-
```
|
|
83
|
-
|
|
84
|
-
**Error if NEITHER file NOR folder found:**
|
|
85
|
-
```
|
|
86
|
-
❌ Feature file not found. Searched:
|
|
87
|
-
- .claude/vibe/features/{feature-name}/ (folder)
|
|
88
|
-
- .claude/vibe/features/{feature-name}.feature (file)
|
|
89
|
-
|
|
90
|
-
Run /vibe.spec "{feature-name}" first.
|
|
91
|
-
```
|
|
92
|
-
|
|
93
|
-
### 2. Scenario-by-Scenario Verification
|
|
94
|
-
|
|
95
|
-
Automatic verification for each scenario:
|
|
96
|
-
|
|
97
|
-
```
|
|
98
|
-
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
|
|
99
|
-
🔍 Scenario 1/4: Valid login success
|
|
100
|
-
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
|
|
101
|
-
|
|
102
|
-
Given: User is registered
|
|
103
|
-
→ Verify: User creation API exists? ✅
|
|
104
|
-
→ Verify: Test user data available? ✅
|
|
105
|
-
|
|
106
|
-
When: Login with valid email and password
|
|
107
|
-
→ Verify: POST /login endpoint exists? ✅
|
|
108
|
-
→ Verify: Request handling logic exists? ✅
|
|
109
|
-
|
|
110
|
-
Then: Login success + JWT token returned
|
|
111
|
-
→ Verify: Success response code 200? ✅
|
|
112
|
-
→ Verify: JWT token included? ✅
|
|
113
|
-
|
|
114
|
-
✅ Scenario 1 passed!
|
|
115
|
-
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
|
|
116
|
-
```
|
|
117
|
-
|
|
118
|
-
### 3. Verification Methods (PARALLEL — run all applicable at once)
|
|
119
|
-
|
|
120
|
-
> **Run these as parallel sub-agents, not sequentially in main session.**
|
|
121
|
-
> Each method returns pass/fail summary (~200 tokens) instead of bloating main context.
|
|
122
|
-
|
|
123
|
-
| Method | Agent | Condition |
|
|
124
|
-
|--------|-------|-----------|
|
|
125
|
-
| **Test Execution** | `Task(Bash, "npm test")` | When test files exist |
|
|
126
|
-
| **Build Verification** | `Task(Bash, "npm run build")` | When build script exists |
|
|
127
|
-
| **Type Check** | `Task(subagent_type="typescript-reviewer")` | TypeScript projects |
|
|
128
|
-
| **Code Analysis** | `Task(subagent_type="explorer-low")` | Always (verify logic against SPEC) |
|
|
129
|
-
| **E2E Closed Loop** | `Task(subagent_type="e2e-tester")` | `--e2e` flag or UI scenarios |
|
|
130
|
-
|
|
131
|
-
```text
|
|
132
|
-
# Launch ALL applicable methods in ONE message (parallel)
|
|
133
|
-
Task(Bash, command="npm run build && echo BUILD_OK || echo BUILD_FAIL")
|
|
134
|
-
Task(Bash, command="npm test -- --reporter=verbose 2>&1 | tail -20")
|
|
135
|
-
Task(subagent_type="explorer-low", prompt="Verify [scenario] Given/When/Then against code...")
|
|
136
|
-
```
|
|
137
|
-
|
|
138
|
-
### 3.1. E2E Closed Loop Verification (`--e2e`)
|
|
139
|
-
|
|
140
|
-
**AI가 직접 브라우저를 조작하여 시나리오를 검증하고, 실패 시 자동 수정 후 재검증한다.**
|
|
141
|
-
|
|
142
|
-
```
|
|
143
|
-
구현 → E2E 검증 → 실패 → 수정 → 재검증 → ... → 통과
|
|
144
|
-
↑_____________________________________↓
|
|
145
|
-
Closed Loop: 사람 개입 없이 AI가 완주
|
|
146
|
-
```
|
|
147
|
-
|
|
148
|
-
**Browser Tool Priority (토큰 효율 순):**
|
|
149
|
-
|
|
150
|
-
| Priority | Tool | 토큰/액션 | 사용 조건 |
|
|
151
|
-
|----------|------|----------|----------|
|
|
152
|
-
| 1st | Agent Browser (접근성 트리) | ~6-20 chars | MCP 사용 가능 시 |
|
|
153
|
-
| 2nd | Playwright Test Runner | pass/fail만 | 테스트 코드 실행 |
|
|
154
|
-
| 3rd | Playwright MCP (DOM) | ~12,000+ chars | 최후 수단 |
|
|
155
|
-
|
|
156
|
-
**Closed Loop 실행 흐름:**
|
|
157
|
-
|
|
158
|
-
```
|
|
159
|
-
For each UI scenario in Feature file:
|
|
160
|
-
1. [Browser] Navigate → Find elements → Interact → Assert
|
|
161
|
-
2. PASS → Next scenario
|
|
162
|
-
3. FAIL → Collect evidence (screenshot, console errors)
|
|
163
|
-
→ Root cause analysis
|
|
164
|
-
→ Fix code (Read full file first, then edit)
|
|
165
|
-
→ Re-run ONLY failed scenario (max 3 retries)
|
|
166
|
-
4. 3x FAIL → Report as manual fix needed
|
|
167
|
-
```
|
|
168
|
-
|
|
169
|
-
**핵심 원칙: 검증이 가벼워야 루프가 충분히 돈다.**
|
|
170
|
-
- 접근성 트리 기반: `button "Sign In"` = 15 chars
|
|
171
|
-
- DOM 기반: `div class="nav-wrapper mx-4 flex..."` = 200+ chars
|
|
172
|
-
- 전자를 사용해야 시나리오 50개도 한 세션에서 검증 가능
|
|
173
|
-
|
|
174
|
-
### 4. Quality Report (Auto-generated)
|
|
175
|
-
|
|
176
|
-
```
|
|
177
|
-
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
|
|
178
|
-
│ 📊 VERIFICATION REPORT: login │
|
|
179
|
-
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
|
|
180
|
-
│ │
|
|
181
|
-
│ ✅ Scenarios: 4/4 passed (100%) │
|
|
182
|
-
│ │
|
|
183
|
-
│ ┌───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │
|
|
184
|
-
│ │ # │ Scenario │ Given │ When │ Then │ Status │ │
|
|
185
|
-
│ │───│───────────────────────│───────│──────│──────│────────│ │
|
|
186
|
-
│ │ 1 │ Valid login success │ ✅ │ ✅ │ ✅ │ ✅ │ │
|
|
187
|
-
│ │ 2 │ Invalid password error│ ✅ │ ✅ │ ✅ │ ✅ │ │
|
|
188
|
-
│ │ 3 │ Email format validation│ ✅ │ ✅ │ ✅ │ ✅ │ │
|
|
189
|
-
│ │ 4 │ Forgot password link │ ✅ │ ✅ │ ✅ │ ✅ │ │
|
|
190
|
-
│ └───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘ │
|
|
191
|
-
│ │
|
|
192
|
-
│ 📈 Quality Score: 94/100 │
|
|
193
|
-
│ │
|
|
194
|
-
│ ┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │
|
|
195
|
-
│ │ Item │ Result│ Details │ │
|
|
196
|
-
│ │───────────────────│───────│─────────────────────────────│ │
|
|
197
|
-
│ │ Build │ ✅ │ Success │ │
|
|
198
|
-
│ │ Tests │ ✅ │ 12/12 passed │ │
|
|
199
|
-
│ │ Type Check │ ✅ │ 0 errors │ │
|
|
200
|
-
│ │ Complexity │ ✅ │ All functions ≤30 lines │ │
|
|
201
|
-
│ │ Code Coverage │ ⚠️ │ 78% (target: 80%) │ │
|
|
202
|
-
│ └─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘ │
|
|
203
|
-
│ │
|
|
204
|
-
│ 📋 Recommendations: │
|
|
205
|
-
│ - Need 2% more code coverage (auth.service.ts line 45-52) │
|
|
206
|
-
│ │
|
|
207
|
-
│ ⏱️ Started: {start_time} │
|
|
208
|
-
│ ⏱️ Completed: {getCurrentTime 결과} │
|
|
209
|
-
│ │
|
|
210
|
-
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
|
|
211
|
-
```
|
|
212
|
-
|
|
213
|
-
### Failure Report
|
|
214
|
-
|
|
215
|
-
```
|
|
216
|
-
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
|
|
217
|
-
│ 📊 VERIFICATION REPORT: login │
|
|
218
|
-
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
|
|
219
|
-
│ │
|
|
220
|
-
│ ❌ Scenarios: 3/4 passed (75%) │
|
|
221
|
-
│ │
|
|
222
|
-
│ ┌───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │
|
|
223
|
-
│ │ # │ Scenario │ Given │ When │ Then │ Status │ │
|
|
224
|
-
│ │───│───────────────────────│───────│──────│──────│────────│ │
|
|
225
|
-
│ │ 1 │ Valid login success │ ✅ │ ✅ │ ✅ │ ✅ │ │
|
|
226
|
-
│ │ 2 │ Invalid password error│ ✅ │ ✅ │ ✅ │ ✅ │ │
|
|
227
|
-
│ │ 3 │ Email format validation│ ✅ │ ✅ │ ✅ │ ✅ │ │
|
|
228
|
-
│ │ 4 │ Forgot password link │ ✅ │ ❌ │ - │ ❌ │ │
|
|
229
|
-
│ └───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘ │
|
|
230
|
-
│ │
|
|
231
|
-
│ ❌ Failure Details: │
|
|
232
|
-
│ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ │
|
|
233
|
-
│ Scenario 4: Forgot password link │
|
|
234
|
-
│ │
|
|
235
|
-
│ When: Click "Forgot password" │
|
|
236
|
-
│ ❌ Issue: Link not implemented │
|
|
237
|
-
│ 📍 Location: LoginForm.tsx line 42 │
|
|
238
|
-
│ 💡 Fix: Need to add "Forgot password" link │
|
|
239
|
-
│ │
|
|
240
|
-
│ 🔧 Auto-fix command: /vibe.run "login" --fix │
|
|
241
|
-
│ │
|
|
242
|
-
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
|
|
243
|
-
```
|
|
244
|
-
|
|
245
|
-
## Input
|
|
246
|
-
|
|
247
|
-
- `.claude/vibe/features/{feature-name}.feature` or `.claude/vibe/features/{feature-name}/` - BDD scenarios
|
|
248
|
-
- `.claude/vibe/specs/{feature-name}.md` or `.claude/vibe/specs/{feature-name}/` - SPEC document (reference)
|
|
249
|
-
- Implemented source code
|
|
250
|
-
|
|
251
|
-
## Output
|
|
252
|
-
|
|
253
|
-
- Verification result report (terminal output)
|
|
254
|
-
- Passed/failed scenario list
|
|
255
|
-
- Items needing fixes
|
|
256
|
-
|
|
257
|
-
## Example
|
|
258
|
-
|
|
259
|
-
```
|
|
260
|
-
User: /vibe.verify "login"
|
|
261
|
-
|
|
262
|
-
Claude:
|
|
263
|
-
📄 Loading Feature: .claude/vibe/features/login.feature
|
|
264
|
-
🔍 Starting verification...
|
|
265
|
-
|
|
266
|
-
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
|
|
267
|
-
🔍 Scenario 1/4: Valid login success
|
|
268
|
-
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
|
|
269
|
-
✅ Given: User registered - OK
|
|
270
|
-
✅ When: Login attempt - OK
|
|
271
|
-
✅ Then: JWT token returned - OK
|
|
272
|
-
✅ Passed!
|
|
273
|
-
|
|
274
|
-
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
|
|
275
|
-
🔍 Scenario 2/4: Invalid password error
|
|
276
|
-
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
|
|
277
|
-
✅ Given: OK
|
|
278
|
-
✅ When: OK
|
|
279
|
-
✅ Then: OK
|
|
280
|
-
✅ Passed!
|
|
281
|
-
|
|
282
|
-
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
|
|
283
|
-
🔍 Scenario 3/4: Email format validation
|
|
284
|
-
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
|
|
285
|
-
✅ Given: OK
|
|
286
|
-
✅ When: OK
|
|
287
|
-
✅ Then: OK
|
|
288
|
-
✅ Passed!
|
|
289
|
-
|
|
290
|
-
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
|
|
291
|
-
🔍 Scenario 4/4: Forgot password link
|
|
292
|
-
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
|
|
293
|
-
✅ Given: OK
|
|
294
|
-
❌ When: "Forgot password" link - missing
|
|
295
|
-
- Then: (skipped)
|
|
296
|
-
❌ Failed!
|
|
297
|
-
|
|
298
|
-
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
|
|
299
|
-
│ 📊 VERIFICATION REPORT: login │
|
|
300
|
-
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
|
|
301
|
-
│ │
|
|
302
|
-
│ ❌ Scenarios: 3/4 passed (75%) │
|
|
303
|
-
│ │
|
|
304
|
-
│ | # | Scenario | Status | │
|
|
305
|
-
│ |---|───────────────────────|────────| │
|
|
306
|
-
│ | 1 | Valid login success | ✅ | │
|
|
307
|
-
│ | 2 | Invalid password error| ✅ | │
|
|
308
|
-
│ | 3 | Email format validation| ✅ | │
|
|
309
|
-
│ | 4 | Forgot password link | ❌ | │
|
|
310
|
-
│ │
|
|
311
|
-
│ 📈 Quality Score: 75/100 │
|
|
312
|
-
│ │
|
|
313
|
-
│ ❌ Fixes needed: │
|
|
314
|
-
│ - Scenario 4: Add "Forgot password" link in LoginForm.tsx │
|
|
315
|
-
│ │
|
|
316
|
-
│ 🔧 Auto-fix: /vibe.run "login" --fix │
|
|
317
|
-
│ │
|
|
318
|
-
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
|
|
319
|
-
```
|
|
320
|
-
|
|
321
|
-
## Core Tools (Code Analysis & Quality)
|
|
322
|
-
|
|
323
|
-
### Tool Invocation
|
|
324
|
-
|
|
325
|
-
All tools are called via:
|
|
326
|
-
|
|
327
|
-
```bash
|
|
328
|
-
node -e "import('{{VIBE_PATH_URL}}/node_modules/@su-record/vibe/dist/tools/index.js').then(t => t.TOOL_NAME({...args}).then(r => console.log(r.content[0].text)))"
|
|
329
|
-
```
|
|
330
|
-
|
|
331
|
-
### Recommended Tools for Verification
|
|
332
|
-
|
|
333
|
-
| Tool | Purpose | When to Use |
|
|
334
|
-
|------|---------|-------------|
|
|
335
|
-
| `validateCodeQuality` | Code quality validation | Check complexity, style violations |
|
|
336
|
-
| `analyzeComplexity` | Complexity analysis | Verify function length, nesting depth |
|
|
337
|
-
| `findSymbol` | Find implementations | Verify feature implementation exists |
|
|
338
|
-
| `findReferences` | Find usages | Check if all references are correct |
|
|
339
|
-
|
|
340
|
-
### Example Tool Usage in Verification
|
|
341
|
-
|
|
342
|
-
**1. Validate code quality:**
|
|
343
|
-
|
|
344
|
-
```bash
|
|
345
|
-
node -e "import('{{VIBE_PATH_URL}}/node_modules/@su-record/vibe/dist/tools/index.js').then(t => t.validateCodeQuality({targetPath: 'src/auth/', projectPath: process.cwd()}).then(r => console.log(r.content[0].text)))"
|
|
346
|
-
```
|
|
347
|
-
|
|
348
|
-
**2. Analyze complexity of implementation:**
|
|
349
|
-
|
|
350
|
-
```bash
|
|
351
|
-
node -e "import('{{VIBE_PATH_URL}}/node_modules/@su-record/vibe/dist/tools/index.js').then(t => t.analyzeComplexity({targetPath: 'src/auth/login.ts', projectPath: process.cwd()}).then(r => console.log(r.content[0].text)))"
|
|
352
|
-
```
|
|
353
|
-
|
|
354
|
-
**3. Find implemented feature:**
|
|
355
|
-
|
|
356
|
-
```bash
|
|
357
|
-
node -e "import('{{VIBE_PATH_URL}}/node_modules/@su-record/vibe/dist/tools/index.js').then(t => t.findSymbol({symbolName: 'handleLogin', searchPath: 'src/'}).then(r => console.log(r.content[0].text)))"
|
|
358
|
-
```
|
|
359
|
-
|
|
360
|
-
## Next Step
|
|
361
|
-
|
|
362
|
-
On verification pass:
|
|
363
|
-
|
|
364
|
-
```
|
|
365
|
-
Complete! Proceed to next feature.
|
|
366
|
-
```
|
|
367
|
-
|
|
368
|
-
On verification fail:
|
|
369
|
-
|
|
370
|
-
```
|
|
371
|
-
/vibe.run "feature-name" --fix # Fix failed scenarios
|
|
372
|
-
```
|
|
373
|
-
|
|
374
|
-
---
|
|
375
|
-
|
|
376
|
-
## Quality Gate (Mandatory)
|
|
377
|
-
|
|
378
|
-
### Verification Quality Checklist
|
|
379
|
-
|
|
380
|
-
Before marking verification complete, ALL items must pass:
|
|
381
|
-
|
|
382
|
-
| Category | Check Item | Weight |
|
|
383
|
-
|----------|------------|--------|
|
|
384
|
-
| **Scenario Coverage** | All scenarios from feature file tested | 25% |
|
|
385
|
-
| **Given Verification** | All preconditions validated | 15% |
|
|
386
|
-
| **When Verification** | All actions executable | 15% |
|
|
387
|
-
| **Then Verification** | All expected outcomes confirmed | 20% |
|
|
388
|
-
| **Build Status** | Project builds without errors | 10% |
|
|
389
|
-
| **Test Status** | All existing tests pass | 10% |
|
|
390
|
-
| **Type Check** | No TypeScript/type errors | 5% |
|
|
391
|
-
|
|
392
|
-
### Verification Score Calculation
|
|
393
|
-
|
|
394
|
-
```
|
|
395
|
-
Score = (passed_scenarios / total_scenarios) × 100
|
|
396
|
-
|
|
397
|
-
Grades:
|
|
398
|
-
- 100%: ✅ PERFECT - All scenarios pass
|
|
399
|
-
- 90-99%: ⚠️ ALMOST - Minor gaps, review needed
|
|
400
|
-
- 70-89%: ❌ INCOMPLETE - Significant gaps
|
|
401
|
-
- 0-69%: ❌ FAILED - Major implementation missing
|
|
402
|
-
```
|
|
403
|
-
|
|
404
|
-
### Pass/Fail Criteria
|
|
405
|
-
|
|
406
|
-
| Metric | Pass Threshold | Action on Fail |
|
|
407
|
-
|--------|----------------|----------------|
|
|
408
|
-
| Scenario pass rate | 100% | Run `/vibe.run --fix` |
|
|
409
|
-
| Build status | Success | Fix build errors first |
|
|
410
|
-
| Test pass rate | 100% | Fix failing tests |
|
|
411
|
-
| Type check | 0 errors | Fix type errors |
|
|
412
|
-
|
|
413
|
-
### Verification Methods Matrix
|
|
414
|
-
|
|
415
|
-
| Method | Trigger Condition | What It Checks |
|
|
416
|
-
|--------|-------------------|----------------|
|
|
417
|
-
| **Code Analysis** | Always | Implementation exists |
|
|
418
|
-
| **Test Execution** | Test files exist | Logic correctness |
|
|
419
|
-
| **Build Verification** | Build script exists | Compilation success |
|
|
420
|
-
| **Type Check** | tsconfig.json exists | Type safety |
|
|
421
|
-
| **Lint Check** | ESLint config exists | Code style |
|
|
422
|
-
|
|
423
|
-
### Scenario Verification Depth
|
|
424
|
-
|
|
425
|
-
For each scenario, verify at THREE levels:
|
|
426
|
-
|
|
427
|
-
| Level | Verification | Example |
|
|
428
|
-
|-------|--------------|---------|
|
|
429
|
-
| **L1: Existence** | Code/function exists | `login()` function defined |
|
|
430
|
-
| **L2: Logic** | Implementation is correct | Validates email format |
|
|
431
|
-
| **L3: Integration** | Works with other components | Returns valid JWT |
|
|
432
|
-
|
|
433
|
-
### Auto-Fix Triggers
|
|
434
|
-
|
|
435
|
-
| Verification Failure | Auto-Fix Action |
|
|
436
|
-
|----------------------|-----------------|
|
|
437
|
-
| Missing implementation | Generate skeleton from scenario |
|
|
438
|
-
| Test failure | Analyze and suggest fix |
|
|
439
|
-
| Build error | Show error location |
|
|
440
|
-
| Type error | Suggest type annotations |
|
|
441
|
-
|
|
442
|
-
### Failure Escalation (max 3 retries)
|
|
443
|
-
|
|
444
|
-
```
|
|
445
|
-
Auto-fix attempt 1 → Re-verify
|
|
446
|
-
❌ Still failing?
|
|
447
|
-
Auto-fix attempt 2 → Re-verify
|
|
448
|
-
❌ Still failing?
|
|
449
|
-
Auto-fix attempt 3 → Re-verify
|
|
450
|
-
❌ Still failing?
|
|
451
|
-
→ STOP. Do NOT retry further.
|
|
452
|
-
→ Record failure in .claude/vibe/todos/verify-failure-{scenario}.md
|
|
453
|
-
→ Report to user: "Scenario X failed after 3 attempts. Manual review needed."
|
|
454
|
-
→ Continue to next scenario (don't block entire verification)
|
|
455
|
-
```
|
|
456
|
-
|
|
457
|
-
### Verification Report Requirements
|
|
458
|
-
|
|
459
|
-
Every verification MUST produce:
|
|
460
|
-
|
|
461
|
-
1. **Scenario Summary Table**
|
|
462
|
-
- Scenario name
|
|
463
|
-
- Given/When/Then status (✅/❌)
|
|
464
|
-
- Overall status
|
|
465
|
-
|
|
466
|
-
2. **Quality Metrics**
|
|
467
|
-
- Build status
|
|
468
|
-
- Test pass count
|
|
469
|
-
- Type error count
|
|
470
|
-
- Code coverage percentage
|
|
471
|
-
|
|
472
|
-
3. **Failure Details** (if any)
|
|
473
|
-
- Exact failure point (Given/When/Then)
|
|
474
|
-
- Expected vs actual
|
|
475
|
-
- File path and line number
|
|
476
|
-
- Suggested fix command
|
|
477
|
-
|
|
478
|
-
4. **Recommendations**
|
|
479
|
-
- Specific files to modify
|
|
480
|
-
- Auto-fix command if available
|
|
481
|
-
|
|
482
|
-
---
|
|
483
|
-
|
|
484
|
-
ARGUMENTS: $ARGUMENTS
|
|
1
|
+
---
|
|
2
|
+
description: Verify implementation against SPEC requirements
|
|
3
|
+
argument-hint: "feature name"
|
|
4
|
+
---
|
|
5
|
+
|
|
6
|
+
# /vibe.verify
|
|
7
|
+
|
|
8
|
+
**Automated Quality Verification** - Making quality trustworthy even for non-developers.
|
|
9
|
+
|
|
10
|
+
> All scenarios passed = Quality assured
|
|
11
|
+
|
|
12
|
+
## Usage
|
|
13
|
+
|
|
14
|
+
```
|
|
15
|
+
/vibe.verify "feature-name" # SPEC-based verification
|
|
16
|
+
/vibe.verify --e2e "feature-name" # E2E browser test (agents/e2e-tester.md)
|
|
17
|
+
/vibe.verify --e2e --visual # Visual regression test
|
|
18
|
+
/vibe.verify --e2e --record # Video recording
|
|
19
|
+
```
|
|
20
|
+
|
|
21
|
+
> **⏱️ Timer**: Call `getCurrentTime` tool at the START. Record the result as `{start_time}`.
|
|
22
|
+
|
|
23
|
+
## File Reading Policy (Mandatory)
|
|
24
|
+
|
|
25
|
+
- **SPEC/Feature 파일**: 반드시 `Read` 도구로 전체 파일을 읽을 것 (Grep 금지)
|
|
26
|
+
- **소스코드 파일**: 검증 대상 파일은 반드시 `Read` 도구로 전체 읽은 후 검증할 것
|
|
27
|
+
- **Grep 사용 제한**: 파일 위치 탐색(어떤 파일에 있는지 찾기)에만 사용. 파일 내용 파악에는 반드시 Read 사용
|
|
28
|
+
- **시나리오 검증 시**: Given/When/Then 각 단계의 구현 코드를 Read로 전체 읽어 확인할 것. Grep 매칭만으로 "구현됨"이라 판단 금지
|
|
29
|
+
- **부분 읽기 금지**: Grep 결과의 주변 몇 줄만 보고 판단하지 말 것. 전체 맥락을 파악해야 정확한 검증 가능
|
|
30
|
+
|
|
31
|
+
## Core Principles
|
|
32
|
+
|
|
33
|
+
```
|
|
34
|
+
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
|
|
35
|
+
│ What non-developers need to know │
|
|
36
|
+
│ │
|
|
37
|
+
│ ✅ Scenarios: 4/4 passed │
|
|
38
|
+
│ 📈 Quality Score: 94/100 │
|
|
39
|
+
│ │
|
|
40
|
+
│ Just look at this. The system handles the rest. │
|
|
41
|
+
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
|
|
42
|
+
```
|
|
43
|
+
|
|
44
|
+
## Process
|
|
45
|
+
|
|
46
|
+
### 1. Load Feature File
|
|
47
|
+
|
|
48
|
+
**Search order (check BOTH file AND folder):**
|
|
49
|
+
|
|
50
|
+
```
|
|
51
|
+
Step 1: Check if SPLIT structure exists (folder)
|
|
52
|
+
📁 .claude/vibe/features/{feature-name}/ → Folder with _index.feature + phase files
|
|
53
|
+
📁 .claude/vibe/specs/{feature-name}/ → Folder with _index.md + phase files
|
|
54
|
+
|
|
55
|
+
Step 2: If no folder, check single file
|
|
56
|
+
📄 .claude/vibe/features/{feature-name}.feature → Single Feature file
|
|
57
|
+
📄 .claude/vibe/specs/{feature-name}.md → Single SPEC file
|
|
58
|
+
|
|
59
|
+
Step 3: If neither exists → Error
|
|
60
|
+
```
|
|
61
|
+
|
|
62
|
+
**Split structure (folder) detected:**
|
|
63
|
+
```
|
|
64
|
+
📁 .claude/vibe/features/{feature-name}/
|
|
65
|
+
├── _index.feature → Master Feature (read first for scenario overview)
|
|
66
|
+
├── phase-1-{name}.feature → Phase 1 scenarios
|
|
67
|
+
├── phase-2-{name}.feature → Phase 2 scenarios
|
|
68
|
+
└── ...
|
|
69
|
+
|
|
70
|
+
📁 .claude/vibe/specs/{feature-name}/
|
|
71
|
+
├── _index.md → Master SPEC (read first for overview)
|
|
72
|
+
├── phase-1-{name}.md → Phase 1 SPEC
|
|
73
|
+
└── ...
|
|
74
|
+
|
|
75
|
+
→ Load _index files first, then verify phase by phase
|
|
76
|
+
```
|
|
77
|
+
|
|
78
|
+
**Single file detected:**
|
|
79
|
+
```
|
|
80
|
+
📄 .claude/vibe/features/{feature-name}.feature → Scenario list
|
|
81
|
+
📄 .claude/vibe/specs/{feature-name}.md → Verification criteria (reference)
|
|
82
|
+
```
|
|
83
|
+
|
|
84
|
+
**Error if NEITHER file NOR folder found:**
|
|
85
|
+
```
|
|
86
|
+
❌ Feature file not found. Searched:
|
|
87
|
+
- .claude/vibe/features/{feature-name}/ (folder)
|
|
88
|
+
- .claude/vibe/features/{feature-name}.feature (file)
|
|
89
|
+
|
|
90
|
+
Run /vibe.spec "{feature-name}" first.
|
|
91
|
+
```
|
|
92
|
+
|
|
93
|
+
### 2. Scenario-by-Scenario Verification
|
|
94
|
+
|
|
95
|
+
Automatic verification for each scenario:
|
|
96
|
+
|
|
97
|
+
```
|
|
98
|
+
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
|
|
99
|
+
🔍 Scenario 1/4: Valid login success
|
|
100
|
+
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
|
|
101
|
+
|
|
102
|
+
Given: User is registered
|
|
103
|
+
→ Verify: User creation API exists? ✅
|
|
104
|
+
→ Verify: Test user data available? ✅
|
|
105
|
+
|
|
106
|
+
When: Login with valid email and password
|
|
107
|
+
→ Verify: POST /login endpoint exists? ✅
|
|
108
|
+
→ Verify: Request handling logic exists? ✅
|
|
109
|
+
|
|
110
|
+
Then: Login success + JWT token returned
|
|
111
|
+
→ Verify: Success response code 200? ✅
|
|
112
|
+
→ Verify: JWT token included? ✅
|
|
113
|
+
|
|
114
|
+
✅ Scenario 1 passed!
|
|
115
|
+
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
|
|
116
|
+
```
|
|
117
|
+
|
|
118
|
+
### 3. Verification Methods (PARALLEL — run all applicable at once)
|
|
119
|
+
|
|
120
|
+
> **Run these as parallel sub-agents, not sequentially in main session.**
|
|
121
|
+
> Each method returns pass/fail summary (~200 tokens) instead of bloating main context.
|
|
122
|
+
|
|
123
|
+
| Method | Agent | Condition |
|
|
124
|
+
|--------|-------|-----------|
|
|
125
|
+
| **Test Execution** | `Task(Bash, "npm test")` | When test files exist |
|
|
126
|
+
| **Build Verification** | `Task(Bash, "npm run build")` | When build script exists |
|
|
127
|
+
| **Type Check** | `Task(subagent_type="typescript-reviewer")` | TypeScript projects |
|
|
128
|
+
| **Code Analysis** | `Task(subagent_type="explorer-low")` | Always (verify logic against SPEC) |
|
|
129
|
+
| **E2E Closed Loop** | `Task(subagent_type="e2e-tester")` | `--e2e` flag or UI scenarios |
|
|
130
|
+
|
|
131
|
+
```text
|
|
132
|
+
# Launch ALL applicable methods in ONE message (parallel)
|
|
133
|
+
Task(Bash, command="npm run build && echo BUILD_OK || echo BUILD_FAIL")
|
|
134
|
+
Task(Bash, command="npm test -- --reporter=verbose 2>&1 | tail -20")
|
|
135
|
+
Task(subagent_type="explorer-low", prompt="Verify [scenario] Given/When/Then against code...")
|
|
136
|
+
```
|
|
137
|
+
|
|
138
|
+
### 3.1. E2E Closed Loop Verification (`--e2e`)
|
|
139
|
+
|
|
140
|
+
**AI가 직접 브라우저를 조작하여 시나리오를 검증하고, 실패 시 자동 수정 후 재검증한다.**
|
|
141
|
+
|
|
142
|
+
```
|
|
143
|
+
구현 → E2E 검증 → 실패 → 수정 → 재검증 → ... → 통과
|
|
144
|
+
↑_____________________________________↓
|
|
145
|
+
Closed Loop: 사람 개입 없이 AI가 완주
|
|
146
|
+
```
|
|
147
|
+
|
|
148
|
+
**Browser Tool Priority (토큰 효율 순):**
|
|
149
|
+
|
|
150
|
+
| Priority | Tool | 토큰/액션 | 사용 조건 |
|
|
151
|
+
|----------|------|----------|----------|
|
|
152
|
+
| 1st | Agent Browser (접근성 트리) | ~6-20 chars | MCP 사용 가능 시 |
|
|
153
|
+
| 2nd | Playwright Test Runner | pass/fail만 | 테스트 코드 실행 |
|
|
154
|
+
| 3rd | Playwright MCP (DOM) | ~12,000+ chars | 최후 수단 |
|
|
155
|
+
|
|
156
|
+
**Closed Loop 실행 흐름:**
|
|
157
|
+
|
|
158
|
+
```
|
|
159
|
+
For each UI scenario in Feature file:
|
|
160
|
+
1. [Browser] Navigate → Find elements → Interact → Assert
|
|
161
|
+
2. PASS → Next scenario
|
|
162
|
+
3. FAIL → Collect evidence (screenshot, console errors)
|
|
163
|
+
→ Root cause analysis
|
|
164
|
+
→ Fix code (Read full file first, then edit)
|
|
165
|
+
→ Re-run ONLY failed scenario (max 3 retries)
|
|
166
|
+
4. 3x FAIL → Report as manual fix needed
|
|
167
|
+
```
|
|
168
|
+
|
|
169
|
+
**핵심 원칙: 검증이 가벼워야 루프가 충분히 돈다.**
|
|
170
|
+
- 접근성 트리 기반: `button "Sign In"` = 15 chars
|
|
171
|
+
- DOM 기반: `div class="nav-wrapper mx-4 flex..."` = 200+ chars
|
|
172
|
+
- 전자를 사용해야 시나리오 50개도 한 세션에서 검증 가능
|
|
173
|
+
|
|
174
|
+
### 4. Quality Report (Auto-generated)
|
|
175
|
+
|
|
176
|
+
```
|
|
177
|
+
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
|
|
178
|
+
│ 📊 VERIFICATION REPORT: login │
|
|
179
|
+
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
|
|
180
|
+
│ │
|
|
181
|
+
│ ✅ Scenarios: 4/4 passed (100%) │
|
|
182
|
+
│ │
|
|
183
|
+
│ ┌───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │
|
|
184
|
+
│ │ # │ Scenario │ Given │ When │ Then │ Status │ │
|
|
185
|
+
│ │───│───────────────────────│───────│──────│──────│────────│ │
|
|
186
|
+
│ │ 1 │ Valid login success │ ✅ │ ✅ │ ✅ │ ✅ │ │
|
|
187
|
+
│ │ 2 │ Invalid password error│ ✅ │ ✅ │ ✅ │ ✅ │ │
|
|
188
|
+
│ │ 3 │ Email format validation│ ✅ │ ✅ │ ✅ │ ✅ │ │
|
|
189
|
+
│ │ 4 │ Forgot password link │ ✅ │ ✅ │ ✅ │ ✅ │ │
|
|
190
|
+
│ └───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘ │
|
|
191
|
+
│ │
|
|
192
|
+
│ 📈 Quality Score: 94/100 │
|
|
193
|
+
│ │
|
|
194
|
+
│ ┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │
|
|
195
|
+
│ │ Item │ Result│ Details │ │
|
|
196
|
+
│ │───────────────────│───────│─────────────────────────────│ │
|
|
197
|
+
│ │ Build │ ✅ │ Success │ │
|
|
198
|
+
│ │ Tests │ ✅ │ 12/12 passed │ │
|
|
199
|
+
│ │ Type Check │ ✅ │ 0 errors │ │
|
|
200
|
+
│ │ Complexity │ ✅ │ All functions ≤30 lines │ │
|
|
201
|
+
│ │ Code Coverage │ ⚠️ │ 78% (target: 80%) │ │
|
|
202
|
+
│ └─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘ │
|
|
203
|
+
│ │
|
|
204
|
+
│ 📋 Recommendations: │
|
|
205
|
+
│ - Need 2% more code coverage (auth.service.ts line 45-52) │
|
|
206
|
+
│ │
|
|
207
|
+
│ ⏱️ Started: {start_time} │
|
|
208
|
+
│ ⏱️ Completed: {getCurrentTime 결과} │
|
|
209
|
+
│ │
|
|
210
|
+
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
|
|
211
|
+
```
|
|
212
|
+
|
|
213
|
+
### Failure Report
|
|
214
|
+
|
|
215
|
+
```
|
|
216
|
+
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
|
|
217
|
+
│ 📊 VERIFICATION REPORT: login │
|
|
218
|
+
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
|
|
219
|
+
│ │
|
|
220
|
+
│ ❌ Scenarios: 3/4 passed (75%) │
|
|
221
|
+
│ │
|
|
222
|
+
│ ┌───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │
|
|
223
|
+
│ │ # │ Scenario │ Given │ When │ Then │ Status │ │
|
|
224
|
+
│ │───│───────────────────────│───────│──────│──────│────────│ │
|
|
225
|
+
│ │ 1 │ Valid login success │ ✅ │ ✅ │ ✅ │ ✅ │ │
|
|
226
|
+
│ │ 2 │ Invalid password error│ ✅ │ ✅ │ ✅ │ ✅ │ │
|
|
227
|
+
│ │ 3 │ Email format validation│ ✅ │ ✅ │ ✅ │ ✅ │ │
|
|
228
|
+
│ │ 4 │ Forgot password link │ ✅ │ ❌ │ - │ ❌ │ │
|
|
229
|
+
│ └───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘ │
|
|
230
|
+
│ │
|
|
231
|
+
│ ❌ Failure Details: │
|
|
232
|
+
│ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ │
|
|
233
|
+
│ Scenario 4: Forgot password link │
|
|
234
|
+
│ │
|
|
235
|
+
│ When: Click "Forgot password" │
|
|
236
|
+
│ ❌ Issue: Link not implemented │
|
|
237
|
+
│ 📍 Location: LoginForm.tsx line 42 │
|
|
238
|
+
│ 💡 Fix: Need to add "Forgot password" link │
|
|
239
|
+
│ │
|
|
240
|
+
│ 🔧 Auto-fix command: /vibe.run "login" --fix │
|
|
241
|
+
│ │
|
|
242
|
+
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
|
|
243
|
+
```
|
|
244
|
+
|
|
245
|
+
## Input
|
|
246
|
+
|
|
247
|
+
- `.claude/vibe/features/{feature-name}.feature` or `.claude/vibe/features/{feature-name}/` - BDD scenarios
|
|
248
|
+
- `.claude/vibe/specs/{feature-name}.md` or `.claude/vibe/specs/{feature-name}/` - SPEC document (reference)
|
|
249
|
+
- Implemented source code
|
|
250
|
+
|
|
251
|
+
## Output
|
|
252
|
+
|
|
253
|
+
- Verification result report (terminal output)
|
|
254
|
+
- Passed/failed scenario list
|
|
255
|
+
- Items needing fixes
|
|
256
|
+
|
|
257
|
+
## Example
|
|
258
|
+
|
|
259
|
+
```
|
|
260
|
+
User: /vibe.verify "login"
|
|
261
|
+
|
|
262
|
+
Claude:
|
|
263
|
+
📄 Loading Feature: .claude/vibe/features/login.feature
|
|
264
|
+
🔍 Starting verification...
|
|
265
|
+
|
|
266
|
+
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
|
|
267
|
+
🔍 Scenario 1/4: Valid login success
|
|
268
|
+
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
|
|
269
|
+
✅ Given: User registered - OK
|
|
270
|
+
✅ When: Login attempt - OK
|
|
271
|
+
✅ Then: JWT token returned - OK
|
|
272
|
+
✅ Passed!
|
|
273
|
+
|
|
274
|
+
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
|
|
275
|
+
🔍 Scenario 2/4: Invalid password error
|
|
276
|
+
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
|
|
277
|
+
✅ Given: OK
|
|
278
|
+
✅ When: OK
|
|
279
|
+
✅ Then: OK
|
|
280
|
+
✅ Passed!
|
|
281
|
+
|
|
282
|
+
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
|
|
283
|
+
🔍 Scenario 3/4: Email format validation
|
|
284
|
+
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
|
|
285
|
+
✅ Given: OK
|
|
286
|
+
✅ When: OK
|
|
287
|
+
✅ Then: OK
|
|
288
|
+
✅ Passed!
|
|
289
|
+
|
|
290
|
+
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
|
|
291
|
+
🔍 Scenario 4/4: Forgot password link
|
|
292
|
+
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
|
|
293
|
+
✅ Given: OK
|
|
294
|
+
❌ When: "Forgot password" link - missing
|
|
295
|
+
- Then: (skipped)
|
|
296
|
+
❌ Failed!
|
|
297
|
+
|
|
298
|
+
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
|
|
299
|
+
│ 📊 VERIFICATION REPORT: login │
|
|
300
|
+
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
|
|
301
|
+
│ │
|
|
302
|
+
│ ❌ Scenarios: 3/4 passed (75%) │
|
|
303
|
+
│ │
|
|
304
|
+
│ | # | Scenario | Status | │
|
|
305
|
+
│ |---|───────────────────────|────────| │
|
|
306
|
+
│ | 1 | Valid login success | ✅ | │
|
|
307
|
+
│ | 2 | Invalid password error| ✅ | │
|
|
308
|
+
│ | 3 | Email format validation| ✅ | │
|
|
309
|
+
│ | 4 | Forgot password link | ❌ | │
|
|
310
|
+
│ │
|
|
311
|
+
│ 📈 Quality Score: 75/100 │
|
|
312
|
+
│ │
|
|
313
|
+
│ ❌ Fixes needed: │
|
|
314
|
+
│ - Scenario 4: Add "Forgot password" link in LoginForm.tsx │
|
|
315
|
+
│ │
|
|
316
|
+
│ 🔧 Auto-fix: /vibe.run "login" --fix │
|
|
317
|
+
│ │
|
|
318
|
+
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
|
|
319
|
+
```
|
|
320
|
+
|
|
321
|
+
## Core Tools (Code Analysis & Quality)
|
|
322
|
+
|
|
323
|
+
### Tool Invocation
|
|
324
|
+
|
|
325
|
+
All tools are called via:
|
|
326
|
+
|
|
327
|
+
```bash
|
|
328
|
+
node -e "import('{{VIBE_PATH_URL}}/node_modules/@su-record/vibe/dist/tools/index.js').then(t => t.TOOL_NAME({...args}).then(r => console.log(r.content[0].text)))"
|
|
329
|
+
```
|
|
330
|
+
|
|
331
|
+
### Recommended Tools for Verification
|
|
332
|
+
|
|
333
|
+
| Tool | Purpose | When to Use |
|
|
334
|
+
|------|---------|-------------|
|
|
335
|
+
| `validateCodeQuality` | Code quality validation | Check complexity, style violations |
|
|
336
|
+
| `analyzeComplexity` | Complexity analysis | Verify function length, nesting depth |
|
|
337
|
+
| `findSymbol` | Find implementations | Verify feature implementation exists |
|
|
338
|
+
| `findReferences` | Find usages | Check if all references are correct |
|
|
339
|
+
|
|
340
|
+
### Example Tool Usage in Verification
|
|
341
|
+
|
|
342
|
+
**1. Validate code quality:**
|
|
343
|
+
|
|
344
|
+
```bash
|
|
345
|
+
node -e "import('{{VIBE_PATH_URL}}/node_modules/@su-record/vibe/dist/tools/index.js').then(t => t.validateCodeQuality({targetPath: 'src/auth/', projectPath: process.cwd()}).then(r => console.log(r.content[0].text)))"
|
|
346
|
+
```
|
|
347
|
+
|
|
348
|
+
**2. Analyze complexity of implementation:**
|
|
349
|
+
|
|
350
|
+
```bash
|
|
351
|
+
node -e "import('{{VIBE_PATH_URL}}/node_modules/@su-record/vibe/dist/tools/index.js').then(t => t.analyzeComplexity({targetPath: 'src/auth/login.ts', projectPath: process.cwd()}).then(r => console.log(r.content[0].text)))"
|
|
352
|
+
```
|
|
353
|
+
|
|
354
|
+
**3. Find implemented feature:**
|
|
355
|
+
|
|
356
|
+
```bash
|
|
357
|
+
node -e "import('{{VIBE_PATH_URL}}/node_modules/@su-record/vibe/dist/tools/index.js').then(t => t.findSymbol({symbolName: 'handleLogin', searchPath: 'src/'}).then(r => console.log(r.content[0].text)))"
|
|
358
|
+
```
|
|
359
|
+
|
|
360
|
+
## Next Step
|
|
361
|
+
|
|
362
|
+
On verification pass:
|
|
363
|
+
|
|
364
|
+
```
|
|
365
|
+
Complete! Proceed to next feature.
|
|
366
|
+
```
|
|
367
|
+
|
|
368
|
+
On verification fail:
|
|
369
|
+
|
|
370
|
+
```
|
|
371
|
+
/vibe.run "feature-name" --fix # Fix failed scenarios
|
|
372
|
+
```
|
|
373
|
+
|
|
374
|
+
---
|
|
375
|
+
|
|
376
|
+
## Quality Gate (Mandatory)
|
|
377
|
+
|
|
378
|
+
### Verification Quality Checklist
|
|
379
|
+
|
|
380
|
+
Before marking verification complete, ALL items must pass:
|
|
381
|
+
|
|
382
|
+
| Category | Check Item | Weight |
|
|
383
|
+
|----------|------------|--------|
|
|
384
|
+
| **Scenario Coverage** | All scenarios from feature file tested | 25% |
|
|
385
|
+
| **Given Verification** | All preconditions validated | 15% |
|
|
386
|
+
| **When Verification** | All actions executable | 15% |
|
|
387
|
+
| **Then Verification** | All expected outcomes confirmed | 20% |
|
|
388
|
+
| **Build Status** | Project builds without errors | 10% |
|
|
389
|
+
| **Test Status** | All existing tests pass | 10% |
|
|
390
|
+
| **Type Check** | No TypeScript/type errors | 5% |
|
|
391
|
+
|
|
392
|
+
### Verification Score Calculation
|
|
393
|
+
|
|
394
|
+
```
|
|
395
|
+
Score = (passed_scenarios / total_scenarios) × 100
|
|
396
|
+
|
|
397
|
+
Grades:
|
|
398
|
+
- 100%: ✅ PERFECT - All scenarios pass
|
|
399
|
+
- 90-99%: ⚠️ ALMOST - Minor gaps, review needed
|
|
400
|
+
- 70-89%: ❌ INCOMPLETE - Significant gaps
|
|
401
|
+
- 0-69%: ❌ FAILED - Major implementation missing
|
|
402
|
+
```
|
|
403
|
+
|
|
404
|
+
### Pass/Fail Criteria
|
|
405
|
+
|
|
406
|
+
| Metric | Pass Threshold | Action on Fail |
|
|
407
|
+
|--------|----------------|----------------|
|
|
408
|
+
| Scenario pass rate | 100% | Run `/vibe.run --fix` |
|
|
409
|
+
| Build status | Success | Fix build errors first |
|
|
410
|
+
| Test pass rate | 100% | Fix failing tests |
|
|
411
|
+
| Type check | 0 errors | Fix type errors |
|
|
412
|
+
|
|
413
|
+
### Verification Methods Matrix
|
|
414
|
+
|
|
415
|
+
| Method | Trigger Condition | What It Checks |
|
|
416
|
+
|--------|-------------------|----------------|
|
|
417
|
+
| **Code Analysis** | Always | Implementation exists |
|
|
418
|
+
| **Test Execution** | Test files exist | Logic correctness |
|
|
419
|
+
| **Build Verification** | Build script exists | Compilation success |
|
|
420
|
+
| **Type Check** | tsconfig.json exists | Type safety |
|
|
421
|
+
| **Lint Check** | ESLint config exists | Code style |
|
|
422
|
+
|
|
423
|
+
### Scenario Verification Depth
|
|
424
|
+
|
|
425
|
+
For each scenario, verify at THREE levels:
|
|
426
|
+
|
|
427
|
+
| Level | Verification | Example |
|
|
428
|
+
|-------|--------------|---------|
|
|
429
|
+
| **L1: Existence** | Code/function exists | `login()` function defined |
|
|
430
|
+
| **L2: Logic** | Implementation is correct | Validates email format |
|
|
431
|
+
| **L3: Integration** | Works with other components | Returns valid JWT |
|
|
432
|
+
|
|
433
|
+
### Auto-Fix Triggers
|
|
434
|
+
|
|
435
|
+
| Verification Failure | Auto-Fix Action |
|
|
436
|
+
|----------------------|-----------------|
|
|
437
|
+
| Missing implementation | Generate skeleton from scenario |
|
|
438
|
+
| Test failure | Analyze and suggest fix |
|
|
439
|
+
| Build error | Show error location |
|
|
440
|
+
| Type error | Suggest type annotations |
|
|
441
|
+
|
|
442
|
+
### Failure Escalation (max 3 retries)
|
|
443
|
+
|
|
444
|
+
```
|
|
445
|
+
Auto-fix attempt 1 → Re-verify
|
|
446
|
+
❌ Still failing?
|
|
447
|
+
Auto-fix attempt 2 → Re-verify
|
|
448
|
+
❌ Still failing?
|
|
449
|
+
Auto-fix attempt 3 → Re-verify
|
|
450
|
+
❌ Still failing?
|
|
451
|
+
→ STOP. Do NOT retry further.
|
|
452
|
+
→ Record failure in .claude/vibe/todos/verify-failure-{scenario}.md
|
|
453
|
+
→ Report to user: "Scenario X failed after 3 attempts. Manual review needed."
|
|
454
|
+
→ Continue to next scenario (don't block entire verification)
|
|
455
|
+
```
|
|
456
|
+
|
|
457
|
+
### Verification Report Requirements
|
|
458
|
+
|
|
459
|
+
Every verification MUST produce:
|
|
460
|
+
|
|
461
|
+
1. **Scenario Summary Table**
|
|
462
|
+
- Scenario name
|
|
463
|
+
- Given/When/Then status (✅/❌)
|
|
464
|
+
- Overall status
|
|
465
|
+
|
|
466
|
+
2. **Quality Metrics**
|
|
467
|
+
- Build status
|
|
468
|
+
- Test pass count
|
|
469
|
+
- Type error count
|
|
470
|
+
- Code coverage percentage
|
|
471
|
+
|
|
472
|
+
3. **Failure Details** (if any)
|
|
473
|
+
- Exact failure point (Given/When/Then)
|
|
474
|
+
- Expected vs actual
|
|
475
|
+
- File path and line number
|
|
476
|
+
- Suggested fix command
|
|
477
|
+
|
|
478
|
+
4. **Recommendations**
|
|
479
|
+
- Specific files to modify
|
|
480
|
+
- Auto-fix command if available
|
|
481
|
+
|
|
482
|
+
---
|
|
483
|
+
|
|
484
|
+
ARGUMENTS: $ARGUMENTS
|