@su-record/vibe 2.6.26 → 2.6.28

package/commands/vibe.analyze.md

@@ -1,356 +1,356 @@
----
-description: Analyze project or specific feature/module
-argument-hint: "feature-name" or --code or --deps or --arch
----
-
-# /vibe.analyze
-
-Analyze project or specific feature/module.
-
-## Usage
-
-```
-/vibe.analyze                  # Full project quality analysis
-/vibe.analyze "login"          # Login related code exploration + context collection
-/vibe.analyze --code           # Code quality analysis only
-/vibe.analyze --deps           # Dependency analysis only
-/vibe.analyze --arch           # Architecture analysis only
-```
-
-## Context Reset
-
-**When this command runs, previous conversation is ignored.**
-- Explore and analyze code from scratch like new session
-- Base conversation only on newly collected information from this analysis
-
----
-
-## Mode 1: Feature/Module Analysis (`/vibe.analyze "feature-name"`)
-
-### Goal
-
-**Explore all source code** related to user's requested feature/module and **analyze flow** to:
-1. Understand current implementation status
-2. Understand code structure and dependencies
-3. Build context for immediate response to future development/modification requests
-
-### Process
-
-#### 1. Request Analysis
-
-Extract key keywords from user request:
-- Feature name (e.g., login, feed, payment)
-- Action (e.g., create, read, update, delete)
-- Scope (e.g., backend only, frontend only, full)
-
-#### 2. Understand Project Structure
-
-Read `CLAUDE.md`, `package.json`, `pyproject.toml`, etc. to identify tech stack:
-
-**Backend:**
-- FastAPI/Django: `app/api/`, `app/services/`, `app/models/`
-- Express/NestJS: `src/controllers/`, `src/services/`, `src/models/`
-
-**Frontend:**
-- React/Next.js: `src/components/`, `src/pages/`, `src/hooks/`
-- Flutter: `lib/screens/`, `lib/services/`, `lib/providers/`
-
-#### 3. Explore Related Code (Parallel via Orchestrator)
-
-**Exploration strategy using orchestrator:**
-```bash
-# Discover available agents
-node -e "import('@su-record/vibe/orchestrator').then(o => o.listAgents().then(r => console.log(r.content[0].text)))"
-
-# Run parallel exploration agents
-node -e "import('@su-record/vibe/orchestrator').then(async o => {
-  const results = await Promise.all([
-    o.runAgent('Find all [FEATURE] related API endpoints', 'api-explorer'),
-    o.runAgent('Find all [FEATURE] related services/logic', 'service-explorer'),
-    o.runAgent('Find all [FEATURE] related data models', 'model-explorer')
-  ]);
-  console.log('Exploration agents started');
-})"
-```
-
-**Alternative (direct tools):**
-1. **Glob** to collect related file list
-2. **Grep** to locate code by keyword
-3. **Read** to analyze key files in detail
-
-#### 4. Flow Analysis
-
-**API Flow:**
-- Endpoint URL and HTTP method
-- Request/response schema
-- Authentication/authorization requirements
-
-**Business Logic:**
-- Core methods and roles
-- Validation rules
-- External service integrations
-
-**Data Flow:**
-- Related tables/models
-- Relationships (1:N, N:M)
-- Key query patterns
-
-#### 5. Output Analysis Results
-
-```markdown
-## [feature-name] Analysis Results
-
-### Overview
-- **Feature description**: [one-line summary]
-- **Implementation status**: [Complete/In progress/Not implemented]
-- **Related files**: N files
-
-### Structure
-
-#### API Endpoints
-| Method | Path | Description | Auth |
-|--------|------|-------------|------|
-| POST | /api/v1/auth/login | Login | - |
-
-#### Core Services
-- `auth_service.py`: Authentication logic
-  - `login()`: Login processing
-  - `verify_token()`: Token verification
-
-#### Data Models
-- `User`: User table
-  - Key fields: id, email, password_hash
-  - Relationships: Session (1:N)
-
-### Reference File List
-- src/api/auth/router.py:L10-50
-- src/services/auth_service.py:L1-100
-```
-
-#### 6. Complete & Next Action
-
-After analysis:
-1. Output analysis summary
-2. **Ask user to choose workflow** when development is requested:
-
-```
-## Next Steps
-
-Choose a workflow to proceed with development:
-
-| Task Scope | Recommended Approach |
-|----------|----------|
-| Simple fix (1-2 files) | Plan Mode |
-| Complex feature (3+ files, research/verification needed) | /vibe.spec |
-
-1. `/vibe.spec "feature-name"` - VIBE workflow (parallel research + SPEC verification)
-2. Plan Mode - Quick implementation (for simple tasks)
-
-Which approach would you like to use?
-```
-
-3. Wait for user's choice before proceeding
-4. If user chooses VIBE → wait for `/vibe.spec` command
-5. If user chooses Plan Mode → proceed with EnterPlanMode
-
----
-
-## Mode 2: Project Quality Analysis (--code/--deps/--arch)
-
-### Analysis Scope
-
-- **Default** (`/vibe.analyze`): Full analysis (code + dependencies + architecture)
-- **--code**: Code quality analysis only
-- **--deps**: Dependency analysis only
-- **--arch**: Architecture analysis only
-
-### Code Quality Analysis (--code)
-
-- Complexity analysis (Cyclomatic Complexity)
-- Code quality validation
-- Coupling/cohesion check
-
-### Dependency Analysis (--deps)
-
-- Read `package.json` / `pyproject.toml` / `pubspec.yaml`
-- Analyze version conflicts, security vulnerabilities, packages needing updates
-
-### Architecture Analysis (--arch)
-
-- Find core modules
-- Identify module dependencies
-- Detect circular dependencies, layer violations
-
-### Analysis Report
-
-`.claude/vibe/reports/analysis-{date}.md`:
-
-```markdown
-# Project Analysis Report
-
-## Overview
-- Analysis date: 2025-01-06 12:00
-- Analysis scope: Full
-
-## Code Quality (85/100)
-- Average complexity: 8.2 (good)
-- High complexity files: 3
-
-## Dependencies (92/100)
-- Total packages: 42
-- Updates needed: 3
-
-## Architecture (78/100)
-- Circular dependencies: 2 found
-- Layer violations: 1
-
-## Improvement Suggestions
-1. Refactor service.py
-2. Apply lodash security patch
-```
-
-## Vibe Tools (Semantic Analysis)
-
-### Tool Invocation
-
-All tools are called via:
-
-```bash
-node -e "import('@su-record/vibe/tools').then(t => t.TOOL_NAME({...args}).then(r => console.log(r.content[0].text)))"
-```
-
-### Recommended Tools for Analysis
-
-| Tool | Purpose | When to Use |
-|------|---------|-------------|
-| `findSymbol` | Find symbol definitions | Locate function/class implementations |
-| `findReferences` | Find all references | Track usage patterns |
-| `analyzeComplexity` | Complexity analysis | Measure code complexity metrics |
-| `validateCodeQuality` | Quality validation | Check code quality standards |
-| `saveMemory` | Save analysis results | Store analysis findings |
-
-### Example Tool Usage in Analysis
-
-**1. Find function definition:**
-
-```bash
-node -e "import('@su-record/vibe/tools').then(t => t.findSymbol({symbolName: 'login', searchPath: 'src/'}).then(r => console.log(r.content[0].text)))"
-```
-
-**2. Analyze complexity:**
-
-```bash
-node -e "import('@su-record/vibe/tools').then(t => t.analyzeComplexity({targetPath: 'src/services/', projectPath: process.cwd()}).then(r => console.log(r.content[0].text)))"
-```
-
-**3. Validate code quality:**
-
-```bash
-node -e "import('@su-record/vibe/tools').then(t => t.validateCodeQuality({targetPath: 'src/', projectPath: process.cwd()}).then(r => console.log(r.content[0].text)))"
-```
-
-**4. Save analysis results:**
-
-```bash
-node -e "import('@su-record/vibe/tools').then(t => t.saveMemory({key: 'analysis-login-module', value: 'Found 5 related files, complexity avg 6.2', category: 'analysis', projectPath: process.cwd()}).then(r => console.log(r.content[0].text)))"
-```
-
----
-
-## Quality Gate (Mandatory)
-
-### Analysis Quality Checklist
-
-Before completing analysis, ALL items must be checked:
-
-| Category | Check Item | Weight |
-|----------|------------|--------|
-| **Completeness** | All related files identified | 20% |
-| **Completeness** | All API endpoints documented | 15% |
-| **Completeness** | All data models mapped | 15% |
-| **Accuracy** | File paths verified to exist | 10% |
-| **Accuracy** | Line numbers accurate | 10% |
-| **Depth** | Business logic explained | 10% |
-| **Depth** | Dependencies mapped | 10% |
-| **Actionability** | Next steps clearly defined | 10% |
-
-### Analysis Score Calculation
-
-```
-Score = Σ(checked items × weight) / 100
-
-Grades:
-- 95-100: ✅ EXCELLENT - Comprehensive analysis
-- 90-94:  ⚠️ GOOD - Additional exploration recommended
-- 80-89:  ⚠️ FAIR - Needs more exploration
-- 0-79:   ❌ POOR - Incomplete, re-analyze
-```
-
-### Analysis Depth Levels
-
-| Level | Scope | Output |
-|-------|-------|--------|
-| **L1: Surface** | File names, basic structure | File list only |
-| **L2: Structure** | Functions, classes, imports | Structure map |
-| **L3: Logic** | Business logic, data flow | Flow diagrams |
-| **L4: Deep** | Edge cases, dependencies, risks | Full analysis |
-
-**Minimum required: L3 for feature analysis, L2 for project overview**
-
-### Analysis Output Requirements
-
-Every analysis MUST include:
-
-1. **Overview Section**
-   - Feature description (1 sentence)
-   - Implementation status (Complete/In progress/Not implemented)
-   - Related file count
-
-2. **Structure Section**
-   - API endpoints table (Method, Path, Description, Auth)
-   - Core services list with key methods
-   - Data models with fields and relationships
-
-3. **Reference File List**
-   - Absolute or relative paths
-   - Line number ranges for key sections
-   - Brief description per file
-
-4. **Next Steps**
-   - Workflow choice prompt (Plan Mode vs VIBE)
-   - Specific action items if applicable
-
-### Forbidden Incomplete Patterns
-
-| Pattern | Issue | Required Fix |
-|---------|-------|--------------|
-| "and more..." | Incomplete list | List all items |
-| "etc." | Vague scope | Be specific |
-| "related files" without list | Missing details | Provide file paths |
-| Missing line numbers | Hard to navigate | Add `:L10-50` format |
-| No auth info on endpoints | Security gap | Always specify auth |
-
-### Code Quality Analysis Thresholds
-
-When running `--code` analysis:
-
-| Metric | Good | Warning | Critical |
-|--------|------|---------|----------|
-| Avg Complexity | ≤10 | 11-15 | >15 |
-| Max Function Length | ≤30 | 31-50 | >50 |
-| High Complexity Files | 0 | 1-3 | >3 |
-| Circular Dependencies | 0 | 1 | >1 |
-
-### Dependency Analysis Thresholds
-
-When running `--deps` analysis:
-
-| Metric | Good | Warning | Critical |
-|--------|------|---------|----------|
-| Outdated Packages | 0-3 | 4-10 | >10 |
-| Security Vulnerabilities | 0 | 1-2 (low) | Any high/critical |
-| Major Version Behind | 0 | 1-2 | >2 |
-
----
-
-ARGUMENTS: $ARGUMENTS
+---
+description: Analyze project or specific feature/module
+argument-hint: "feature-name" or --code or --deps or --arch
+---
+
+# /vibe.analyze
+
+Analyze project or specific feature/module.
+
+## Usage
+
+```
+/vibe.analyze                  # Full project quality analysis
+/vibe.analyze "login"          # Login related code exploration + context collection
+/vibe.analyze --code           # Code quality analysis only
+/vibe.analyze --deps           # Dependency analysis only
+/vibe.analyze --arch           # Architecture analysis only
+```
+
+## Context Reset
+
+**When this command runs, previous conversation is ignored.**
+- Explore and analyze code from scratch like new session
+- Base conversation only on newly collected information from this analysis
+
+---
+
+## Mode 1: Feature/Module Analysis (`/vibe.analyze "feature-name"`)
+
+### Goal
+
+**Explore all source code** related to user's requested feature/module and **analyze flow** to:
+1. Understand current implementation status
+2. Understand code structure and dependencies
+3. Build context for immediate response to future development/modification requests
+
+### Process
+
+#### 1. Request Analysis
+
+Extract key keywords from user request:
+- Feature name (e.g., login, feed, payment)
+- Action (e.g., create, read, update, delete)
+- Scope (e.g., backend only, frontend only, full)
+
+#### 2. Understand Project Structure
+
+Read `CLAUDE.md`, `package.json`, `pyproject.toml`, etc. to identify tech stack:
+
+**Backend:**
+- FastAPI/Django: `app/api/`, `app/services/`, `app/models/`
+- Express/NestJS: `src/controllers/`, `src/services/`, `src/models/`
+
+**Frontend:**
+- React/Next.js: `src/components/`, `src/pages/`, `src/hooks/`
+- Flutter: `lib/screens/`, `lib/services/`, `lib/providers/`
+
+#### 3. Explore Related Code (Parallel via Orchestrator)
+
+**Exploration strategy using orchestrator:**
+```bash
+# Discover available agents
+node -e "import('@su-record/vibe/orchestrator').then(o => o.listAgents().then(r => console.log(r.content[0].text)))"
+
+# Run parallel exploration agents
+node -e "import('@su-record/vibe/orchestrator').then(async o => {
+  const results = await Promise.all([
+    o.runAgent('Find all [FEATURE] related API endpoints', 'api-explorer'),
+    o.runAgent('Find all [FEATURE] related services/logic', 'service-explorer'),
+    o.runAgent('Find all [FEATURE] related data models', 'model-explorer')
+  ]);
+  console.log('Exploration agents started');
+})"
+```
+
+**Alternative (direct tools):**
+1. **Glob** to collect related file list
+2. **Grep** to locate code by keyword
+3. **Read** to analyze key files in detail
+
+#### 4. Flow Analysis
+
+**API Flow:**
+- Endpoint URL and HTTP method
+- Request/response schema
+- Authentication/authorization requirements
+
+**Business Logic:**
+- Core methods and roles
+- Validation rules
+- External service integrations
+
+**Data Flow:**
+- Related tables/models
+- Relationships (1:N, N:M)
+- Key query patterns
+
+#### 5. Output Analysis Results
+
+```markdown
+## [feature-name] Analysis Results
+
+### Overview
+- **Feature description**: [one-line summary]
+- **Implementation status**: [Complete/In progress/Not implemented]
+- **Related files**: N files
+
+### Structure
+
+#### API Endpoints
+| Method | Path | Description | Auth |
+|--------|------|-------------|------|
+| POST | /api/v1/auth/login | Login | - |
+
+#### Core Services
+- `auth_service.py`: Authentication logic
+  - `login()`: Login processing
+  - `verify_token()`: Token verification
+
+#### Data Models
+- `User`: User table
+  - Key fields: id, email, password_hash
+  - Relationships: Session (1:N)
+
+### Reference File List
+- src/api/auth/router.py:L10-50
+- src/services/auth_service.py:L1-100
+```
+
+#### 6. Complete & Next Action
+
+After analysis:
+1. Output analysis summary
+2. **Ask user to choose workflow** when development is requested:
+
+```
+## Next Steps
+
+Choose a workflow to proceed with development:
+
+| Task Scope | Recommended Approach |
+|----------|----------|
+| Simple fix (1-2 files) | Plan Mode |
+| Complex feature (3+ files, research/verification needed) | /vibe.spec |
+
+1. `/vibe.spec "feature-name"` - VIBE workflow (parallel research + SPEC verification)
+2. Plan Mode - Quick implementation (for simple tasks)
+
+Which approach would you like to use?
+```
+
+3. Wait for user's choice before proceeding
+4. If user chooses VIBE → wait for `/vibe.spec` command
+5. If user chooses Plan Mode → proceed with EnterPlanMode
+
+---
+
+## Mode 2: Project Quality Analysis (--code/--deps/--arch)
+
+### Analysis Scope
+
+- **Default** (`/vibe.analyze`): Full analysis (code + dependencies + architecture)
+- **--code**: Code quality analysis only
+- **--deps**: Dependency analysis only
+- **--arch**: Architecture analysis only
+
+### Code Quality Analysis (--code)
+
+- Complexity analysis (Cyclomatic Complexity)
+- Code quality validation
+- Coupling/cohesion check
+
+### Dependency Analysis (--deps)
+
+- Read `package.json` / `pyproject.toml` / `pubspec.yaml`
+- Analyze version conflicts, security vulnerabilities, packages needing updates
+
+### Architecture Analysis (--arch)
+
+- Find core modules
+- Identify module dependencies
+- Detect circular dependencies, layer violations
+
+### Analysis Report
+
+`.claude/vibe/reports/analysis-{date}.md`:
+
+```markdown
+# Project Analysis Report
+
+## Overview
+- Analysis date: 2025-01-06 12:00
+- Analysis scope: Full
+
+## Code Quality (85/100)
+- Average complexity: 8.2 (good)
+- High complexity files: 3
+
+## Dependencies (92/100)
+- Total packages: 42
+- Updates needed: 3
+
+## Architecture (78/100)
+- Circular dependencies: 2 found
+- Layer violations: 1
+
+## Improvement Suggestions
+1. Refactor service.py
+2. Apply lodash security patch
+```
+
+## Vibe Tools (Semantic Analysis)
+
+### Tool Invocation
+
+All tools are called via:
+
+```bash
+node -e "import('@su-record/vibe/tools').then(t => t.TOOL_NAME({...args}).then(r => console.log(r.content[0].text)))"
+```
+
+### Recommended Tools for Analysis
+
+| Tool | Purpose | When to Use |
+|------|---------|-------------|
+| `findSymbol` | Find symbol definitions | Locate function/class implementations |
+| `findReferences` | Find all references | Track usage patterns |
+| `analyzeComplexity` | Complexity analysis | Measure code complexity metrics |
+| `validateCodeQuality` | Quality validation | Check code quality standards |
+| `saveMemory` | Save analysis results | Store analysis findings |
+
+### Example Tool Usage in Analysis
+
+**1. Find function definition:**
+
+```bash
+node -e "import('@su-record/vibe/tools').then(t => t.findSymbol({symbolName: 'login', searchPath: 'src/'}).then(r => console.log(r.content[0].text)))"
+```
+
+**2. Analyze complexity:**
+
+```bash
+node -e "import('@su-record/vibe/tools').then(t => t.analyzeComplexity({targetPath: 'src/services/', projectPath: process.cwd()}).then(r => console.log(r.content[0].text)))"
+```
+
+**3. Validate code quality:**
+
+```bash
+node -e "import('@su-record/vibe/tools').then(t => t.validateCodeQuality({targetPath: 'src/', projectPath: process.cwd()}).then(r => console.log(r.content[0].text)))"
+```
+
+**4. Save analysis results:**
+
+```bash
+node -e "import('@su-record/vibe/tools').then(t => t.saveMemory({key: 'analysis-login-module', value: 'Found 5 related files, complexity avg 6.2', category: 'analysis', projectPath: process.cwd()}).then(r => console.log(r.content[0].text)))"
+```
+
+---
+
+## Quality Gate (Mandatory)
+
+### Analysis Quality Checklist
+
+Before completing analysis, ALL items must be checked:
+
+| Category | Check Item | Weight |
+|----------|------------|--------|
+| **Completeness** | All related files identified | 20% |
+| **Completeness** | All API endpoints documented | 15% |
+| **Completeness** | All data models mapped | 15% |
+| **Accuracy** | File paths verified to exist | 10% |
+| **Accuracy** | Line numbers accurate | 10% |
+| **Depth** | Business logic explained | 10% |
+| **Depth** | Dependencies mapped | 10% |
+| **Actionability** | Next steps clearly defined | 10% |
+
+### Analysis Score Calculation
+
+```
+Score = Σ(checked items × weight) / 100
+
+Grades:
+- 95-100: ✅ EXCELLENT - Comprehensive analysis
+- 90-94:  ⚠️ GOOD - Additional exploration recommended
+- 80-89:  ⚠️ FAIR - Needs more exploration
+- 0-79:   ❌ POOR - Incomplete, re-analyze
+```
+
+### Analysis Depth Levels
+
+| Level | Scope | Output |
+|-------|-------|--------|
+| **L1: Surface** | File names, basic structure | File list only |
+| **L2: Structure** | Functions, classes, imports | Structure map |
+| **L3: Logic** | Business logic, data flow | Flow diagrams |
+| **L4: Deep** | Edge cases, dependencies, risks | Full analysis |
+
+**Minimum required: L3 for feature analysis, L2 for project overview**
+
+### Analysis Output Requirements
+
+Every analysis MUST include:
+
+1. **Overview Section**
+   - Feature description (1 sentence)
+   - Implementation status (Complete/In progress/Not implemented)
+   - Related file count
+
+2. **Structure Section**
+   - API endpoints table (Method, Path, Description, Auth)
+   - Core services list with key methods
+   - Data models with fields and relationships
+
+3. **Reference File List**
+   - Absolute or relative paths
+   - Line number ranges for key sections
+   - Brief description per file
+
+4. **Next Steps**
+   - Workflow choice prompt (Plan Mode vs VIBE)
+   - Specific action items if applicable
+
+### Forbidden Incomplete Patterns
+
+| Pattern | Issue | Required Fix |
+|---------|-------|--------------|
+| "and more..." | Incomplete list | List all items |
+| "etc." | Vague scope | Be specific |
+| "related files" without list | Missing details | Provide file paths |
+| Missing line numbers | Hard to navigate | Add `:L10-50` format |
+| No auth info on endpoints | Security gap | Always specify auth |
+
+### Code Quality Analysis Thresholds
+
+When running `--code` analysis:
+
+| Metric | Good | Warning | Critical |
+|--------|------|---------|----------|
+| Avg Complexity | ≤10 | 11-15 | >15 |
+| Max Function Length | ≤30 | 31-50 | >50 |
+| High Complexity Files | 0 | 1-3 | >3 |
+| Circular Dependencies | 0 | 1 | >1 |
+
+### Dependency Analysis Thresholds
+
+When running `--deps` analysis:
+
+| Metric | Good | Warning | Critical |
+|--------|------|---------|----------|
+| Outdated Packages | 0-3 | 4-10 | >10 |
+| Security Vulnerabilities | 0 | 1-2 (low) | Any high/critical |
+| Major Version Behind | 0 | 1-2 | >2 |
+
+---
+
+ARGUMENTS: $ARGUMENTS