@su-record/vibe 2.5.15 → 2.5.17

This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
Files changed (231) hide show
  1. package/CLAUDE.md +96 -267
  2. package/LICENSE +21 -21
  3. package/README.md +262 -262
  4. package/agents/architect-low.md +41 -41
  5. package/agents/architect-medium.md +59 -59
  6. package/agents/architect.md +80 -80
  7. package/agents/build-error-resolver.md +115 -115
  8. package/agents/compounder.md +261 -261
  9. package/agents/diagrammer.md +178 -178
  10. package/agents/e2e-tester.md +266 -266
  11. package/agents/explorer-low.md +42 -42
  12. package/agents/explorer-medium.md +59 -59
  13. package/agents/explorer.md +48 -48
  14. package/agents/implementer-low.md +43 -43
  15. package/agents/implementer-medium.md +52 -52
  16. package/agents/implementer.md +54 -54
  17. package/agents/refactor-cleaner.md +143 -143
  18. package/agents/research/best-practices-agent.md +199 -189
  19. package/agents/research/codebase-patterns-agent.md +157 -147
  20. package/agents/research/framework-docs-agent.md +188 -178
  21. package/agents/research/security-advisory-agent.md +213 -203
  22. package/agents/review/architecture-reviewer.md +107 -107
  23. package/agents/review/complexity-reviewer.md +116 -116
  24. package/agents/review/data-integrity-reviewer.md +88 -88
  25. package/agents/review/git-history-reviewer.md +103 -103
  26. package/agents/review/performance-reviewer.md +86 -86
  27. package/agents/review/python-reviewer.md +150 -150
  28. package/agents/review/rails-reviewer.md +139 -139
  29. package/agents/review/react-reviewer.md +144 -144
  30. package/agents/review/security-reviewer.md +80 -80
  31. package/agents/review/simplicity-reviewer.md +140 -140
  32. package/agents/review/test-coverage-reviewer.md +116 -116
  33. package/agents/review/typescript-reviewer.md +127 -127
  34. package/agents/searcher.md +54 -54
  35. package/agents/simplifier.md +120 -120
  36. package/agents/tester.md +49 -49
  37. package/agents/ui-previewer.md +129 -129
  38. package/commands/vibe.analyze.md +356 -356
  39. package/commands/vibe.reason.md +329 -329
  40. package/commands/vibe.review.md +326 -326
  41. package/commands/vibe.run.md +1117 -1117
  42. package/commands/vibe.spec.md +1066 -1058
  43. package/commands/vibe.utils.md +353 -353
  44. package/commands/vibe.verify.md +375 -375
  45. package/dist/cli/collaborator.js +52 -52
  46. package/dist/cli/detect.js +32 -32
  47. package/dist/cli/index.d.ts.map +1 -1
  48. package/dist/cli/index.js +109 -108
  49. package/dist/cli/index.js.map +1 -1
  50. package/dist/cli/llm.js +144 -144
  51. package/dist/lib/DeepInit.js +24 -24
  52. package/dist/lib/FrameworkDetector.d.ts +56 -0
  53. package/dist/lib/FrameworkDetector.d.ts.map +1 -0
  54. package/dist/lib/FrameworkDetector.js +287 -0
  55. package/dist/lib/FrameworkDetector.js.map +1 -0
  56. package/dist/lib/IterationTracker.js +11 -11
  57. package/dist/lib/PythonParser.js +108 -108
  58. package/dist/lib/RuleBuildSystem.d.ts +117 -0
  59. package/dist/lib/RuleBuildSystem.d.ts.map +1 -0
  60. package/dist/lib/RuleBuildSystem.js +402 -0
  61. package/dist/lib/RuleBuildSystem.js.map +1 -0
  62. package/dist/lib/SkillFrontmatter.js +28 -28
  63. package/dist/lib/SkillQualityGate.js +9 -9
  64. package/dist/lib/SkillRepository.js +159 -159
  65. package/dist/lib/UltraQA.js +77 -77
  66. package/dist/lib/gpt-api.js +4 -4
  67. package/dist/lib/memory/KnowledgeGraph.js +4 -4
  68. package/dist/lib/memory/MemorySearch.js +20 -20
  69. package/dist/lib/memory/MemoryStorage.js +64 -64
  70. package/dist/orchestrator/AgentManager.js +12 -12
  71. package/dist/orchestrator/MultiLlmResearch.js +8 -8
  72. package/dist/orchestrator/SmartRouter.js +11 -11
  73. package/dist/orchestrator/parallelResearch.js +24 -24
  74. package/dist/tools/convention/analyzeComplexity.test.js +115 -115
  75. package/dist/tools/convention/validateCodeQuality.test.js +104 -104
  76. package/dist/tools/index.d.ts +4 -0
  77. package/dist/tools/index.d.ts.map +1 -1
  78. package/dist/tools/index.js +4 -0
  79. package/dist/tools/index.js.map +1 -1
  80. package/hooks/hooks.json +222 -222
  81. package/hooks/scripts/code-check.js +22 -22
  82. package/hooks/scripts/code-review.js +22 -22
  83. package/hooks/scripts/complexity.js +22 -22
  84. package/hooks/scripts/compound.js +23 -23
  85. package/hooks/scripts/context-save.js +33 -33
  86. package/hooks/scripts/generate-brand-assets.js +472 -472
  87. package/hooks/scripts/hud-multiline.js +262 -262
  88. package/hooks/scripts/hud-status.js +291 -291
  89. package/hooks/scripts/keyword-detector.js +214 -214
  90. package/hooks/scripts/llm-orchestrate.js +171 -171
  91. package/hooks/scripts/post-edit.js +97 -97
  92. package/hooks/scripts/post-tool-verify.js +210 -210
  93. package/hooks/scripts/pre-tool-guard.js +125 -125
  94. package/hooks/scripts/recall.js +22 -22
  95. package/hooks/scripts/session-start.js +30 -30
  96. package/hooks/scripts/skill-injector.js +191 -191
  97. package/hooks/scripts/utils.js +97 -97
  98. package/languages/csharp-unity.md +515 -515
  99. package/languages/gdscript-godot.md +470 -470
  100. package/languages/ruby-rails.md +489 -489
  101. package/languages/typescript-angular.md +433 -433
  102. package/languages/typescript-astro.md +416 -416
  103. package/languages/typescript-electron.md +406 -406
  104. package/languages/typescript-nestjs.md +524 -524
  105. package/languages/typescript-svelte.md +407 -407
  106. package/languages/typescript-tauri.md +365 -365
  107. package/package.json +83 -83
  108. package/skills/brand-assets.md +141 -141
  109. package/skills/commerce-patterns.md +361 -361
  110. package/skills/context7-usage.md +102 -102
  111. package/skills/e2e-commerce.md +304 -304
  112. package/skills/frontend-design.md +92 -92
  113. package/skills/git-worktree.md +181 -181
  114. package/skills/parallel-research.md +77 -77
  115. package/skills/priority-todos.md +239 -239
  116. package/skills/seo-checklist.md +244 -244
  117. package/skills/tool-fallback.md +190 -190
  118. package/skills/vibe-capabilities.md +161 -161
  119. package/vibe/constitution.md +227 -227
  120. package/vibe/rules/core/communication-guide.md +98 -98
  121. package/vibe/rules/core/development-philosophy.md +52 -52
  122. package/vibe/rules/core/quick-start.md +102 -102
  123. package/vibe/rules/quality/bdd-contract-testing.md +393 -393
  124. package/vibe/rules/quality/checklist.md +276 -276
  125. package/vibe/rules/quality/testing-strategy.md +440 -440
  126. package/vibe/rules/standards/anti-patterns.md +541 -541
  127. package/vibe/rules/standards/code-structure.md +291 -291
  128. package/vibe/rules/standards/complexity-metrics.md +313 -313
  129. package/vibe/rules/standards/naming-conventions.md +198 -198
  130. package/vibe/setup.sh +31 -31
  131. package/vibe/templates/constitution-template.md +252 -252
  132. package/vibe/templates/contract-backend-template.md +526 -526
  133. package/vibe/templates/contract-frontend-template.md +599 -599
  134. package/vibe/templates/feature-template.md +96 -96
  135. package/vibe/templates/spec-template.md +221 -221
  136. package/dist/cli/mcp.d.ts +0 -49
  137. package/dist/cli/mcp.d.ts.map +0 -1
  138. package/dist/cli/mcp.js +0 -169
  139. package/dist/cli/mcp.js.map +0 -1
  140. package/dist/lib/gemini-mcp.d.ts +0 -10
  141. package/dist/lib/gemini-mcp.d.ts.map +0 -1
  142. package/dist/lib/gemini-mcp.js +0 -353
  143. package/dist/lib/gemini-mcp.js.map +0 -1
  144. package/dist/lib/gpt-mcp.d.ts +0 -10
  145. package/dist/lib/gpt-mcp.d.ts.map +0 -1
  146. package/dist/lib/gpt-mcp.js +0 -352
  147. package/dist/lib/gpt-mcp.js.map +0 -1
  148. package/dist/tools/analytics/getUsageAnalytics.d.ts +0 -10
  149. package/dist/tools/analytics/getUsageAnalytics.d.ts.map +0 -1
  150. package/dist/tools/analytics/getUsageAnalytics.js +0 -246
  151. package/dist/tools/analytics/getUsageAnalytics.js.map +0 -1
  152. package/dist/tools/analytics/index.d.ts +0 -5
  153. package/dist/tools/analytics/index.d.ts.map +0 -1
  154. package/dist/tools/analytics/index.js +0 -5
  155. package/dist/tools/analytics/index.js.map +0 -1
  156. package/dist/tools/convention/getCodingGuide.d.ts +0 -7
  157. package/dist/tools/convention/getCodingGuide.d.ts.map +0 -1
  158. package/dist/tools/convention/getCodingGuide.js +0 -69
  159. package/dist/tools/convention/getCodingGuide.js.map +0 -1
  160. package/dist/tools/planning/analyzeRequirements.d.ts +0 -9
  161. package/dist/tools/planning/analyzeRequirements.d.ts.map +0 -1
  162. package/dist/tools/planning/analyzeRequirements.js +0 -171
  163. package/dist/tools/planning/analyzeRequirements.js.map +0 -1
  164. package/dist/tools/planning/createUserStories.d.ts +0 -9
  165. package/dist/tools/planning/createUserStories.d.ts.map +0 -1
  166. package/dist/tools/planning/createUserStories.js +0 -124
  167. package/dist/tools/planning/createUserStories.js.map +0 -1
  168. package/dist/tools/planning/featureRoadmap.d.ts +0 -10
  169. package/dist/tools/planning/featureRoadmap.d.ts.map +0 -1
  170. package/dist/tools/planning/featureRoadmap.js +0 -207
  171. package/dist/tools/planning/featureRoadmap.js.map +0 -1
  172. package/dist/tools/planning/generatePrd.d.ts +0 -11
  173. package/dist/tools/planning/generatePrd.d.ts.map +0 -1
  174. package/dist/tools/planning/generatePrd.js +0 -161
  175. package/dist/tools/planning/generatePrd.js.map +0 -1
  176. package/dist/tools/planning/index.d.ts +0 -8
  177. package/dist/tools/planning/index.d.ts.map +0 -1
  178. package/dist/tools/planning/index.js +0 -8
  179. package/dist/tools/planning/index.js.map +0 -1
  180. package/dist/tools/prompt/analyzePrompt.d.ts +0 -7
  181. package/dist/tools/prompt/analyzePrompt.d.ts.map +0 -1
  182. package/dist/tools/prompt/analyzePrompt.js +0 -150
  183. package/dist/tools/prompt/analyzePrompt.js.map +0 -1
  184. package/dist/tools/prompt/enhancePrompt.d.ts +0 -8
  185. package/dist/tools/prompt/enhancePrompt.d.ts.map +0 -1
  186. package/dist/tools/prompt/enhancePrompt.js +0 -110
  187. package/dist/tools/prompt/enhancePrompt.js.map +0 -1
  188. package/dist/tools/prompt/enhancePromptGemini.d.ts +0 -8
  189. package/dist/tools/prompt/enhancePromptGemini.d.ts.map +0 -1
  190. package/dist/tools/prompt/enhancePromptGemini.js +0 -332
  191. package/dist/tools/prompt/enhancePromptGemini.js.map +0 -1
  192. package/dist/tools/prompt/index.d.ts +0 -7
  193. package/dist/tools/prompt/index.d.ts.map +0 -1
  194. package/dist/tools/prompt/index.js +0 -7
  195. package/dist/tools/prompt/index.js.map +0 -1
  196. package/dist/tools/reasoning/applyReasoningFramework.d.ts +0 -8
  197. package/dist/tools/reasoning/applyReasoningFramework.d.ts.map +0 -1
  198. package/dist/tools/reasoning/applyReasoningFramework.js +0 -266
  199. package/dist/tools/reasoning/applyReasoningFramework.js.map +0 -1
  200. package/dist/tools/reasoning/index.d.ts +0 -5
  201. package/dist/tools/reasoning/index.d.ts.map +0 -1
  202. package/dist/tools/reasoning/index.js +0 -5
  203. package/dist/tools/reasoning/index.js.map +0 -1
  204. package/dist/tools/thinking/analyzeProblem.d.ts +0 -7
  205. package/dist/tools/thinking/analyzeProblem.d.ts.map +0 -1
  206. package/dist/tools/thinking/analyzeProblem.js +0 -55
  207. package/dist/tools/thinking/analyzeProblem.js.map +0 -1
  208. package/dist/tools/thinking/breakDownProblem.d.ts +0 -8
  209. package/dist/tools/thinking/breakDownProblem.d.ts.map +0 -1
  210. package/dist/tools/thinking/breakDownProblem.js +0 -145
  211. package/dist/tools/thinking/breakDownProblem.js.map +0 -1
  212. package/dist/tools/thinking/createThinkingChain.d.ts +0 -7
  213. package/dist/tools/thinking/createThinkingChain.d.ts.map +0 -1
  214. package/dist/tools/thinking/createThinkingChain.js +0 -44
  215. package/dist/tools/thinking/createThinkingChain.js.map +0 -1
  216. package/dist/tools/thinking/formatAsPlan.d.ts +0 -9
  217. package/dist/tools/thinking/formatAsPlan.d.ts.map +0 -1
  218. package/dist/tools/thinking/formatAsPlan.js +0 -78
  219. package/dist/tools/thinking/formatAsPlan.js.map +0 -1
  220. package/dist/tools/thinking/index.d.ts +0 -10
  221. package/dist/tools/thinking/index.d.ts.map +0 -1
  222. package/dist/tools/thinking/index.js +0 -10
  223. package/dist/tools/thinking/index.js.map +0 -1
  224. package/dist/tools/thinking/stepByStepAnalysis.d.ts +0 -8
  225. package/dist/tools/thinking/stepByStepAnalysis.d.ts.map +0 -1
  226. package/dist/tools/thinking/stepByStepAnalysis.js +0 -63
  227. package/dist/tools/thinking/stepByStepAnalysis.js.map +0 -1
  228. package/dist/tools/thinking/thinkAloudProcess.d.ts +0 -8
  229. package/dist/tools/thinking/thinkAloudProcess.d.ts.map +0 -1
  230. package/dist/tools/thinking/thinkAloudProcess.js +0 -80
  231. package/dist/tools/thinking/thinkAloudProcess.js.map +0 -1
@@ -1,393 +1,393 @@
1
- # BDD + Contract Testing Guide
2
-
3
- **Testing strategy optimized for AI-driven development**
4
-
5
- ---
6
-
7
- ## Overview
8
-
9
- BDD (Behavior-Driven Development) and Contract Testing are essential for **AI agents to accurately understand requirements and generate verifiable code**.
10
-
11
- ### Why is it useful for AI-driven development?
12
-
13
- 1. **Clear input/output contracts** → AI can implement accurately
14
- 2. **Automated verification** → Immediately verify AI-generated code quality
15
- 3. **Regression prevention** → AI modifications don't break existing functionality
16
- 4. **Automated documentation** → Tests serve as executable specifications
17
-
18
- ---
19
-
20
- ## Workflow
21
-
22
- ```
23
- Write SPEC (Requirements)
24
-
25
- Generate Feature file (Gherkin)
26
-
27
- Generate Contract tests (API schema)
28
-
29
- Run tests (Red)
30
-
31
- AI agent implementation
32
-
33
- Run tests (Green)
34
-
35
- Refactoring
36
-
37
- Run tests again (Stay Green)
38
- ```
39
-
40
- ---
41
-
42
- ## 1. BDD (Behavior-Driven Development)
43
-
44
- ### Gherkin Syntax
45
-
46
- ```gherkin
47
- Feature: User Login
48
- As a user
49
- I want to login
50
- So that I can access personalized services
51
-
52
- Scenario: Successful login with valid credentials
53
- Given user is registered with "test@example.com" and "password123"
54
- When login is attempted with "test@example.com" and "password123"
55
- Then login succeeds
56
- And receives JWT token
57
- And redirected to home screen
58
-
59
- Scenario: Failed login with wrong password
60
- Given user is registered with "test@example.com"
61
- When login is attempted with "test@example.com" and "wrong-password"
62
- Then login fails
63
- And receives "Invalid credentials" error message
64
- ```
65
-
66
- ### Step Definitions (Python)
67
-
68
- ```python
69
- from pytest_bdd import scenarios, given, when, then, parsers
70
-
71
- scenarios('features/login.feature')
72
-
73
- @given(parsers.parse('user is registered with "{email}" and "{password}"'))
74
- def user_exists(context, email, password):
75
- context.user = create_user(email=email, password=password)
76
-
77
- @when(parsers.parse('login is attempted with "{email}" and "{password}"'))
78
- def attempt_login(context, email, password):
79
- context.response = login(email=email, password=password)
80
-
81
- @then('login succeeds')
82
- def login_succeeds(context):
83
- assert context.response.status_code == 200
84
-
85
- @then('receives JWT token')
86
- def receives_token(context):
87
- assert 'access_token' in context.response.json()
88
- ```
89
-
90
- ---
91
-
92
- ## 2. Contract Testing
93
-
94
- ### API Contract Definition
95
-
96
- ```json
97
- {
98
- "request": {
99
- "method": "POST",
100
- "path": "/api/auth/login",
101
- "body": {
102
- "email": "string (email format)",
103
- "password": "string (min 8 chars)"
104
- }
105
- },
106
- "response": {
107
- "status": 200,
108
- "body": {
109
- "access_token": "string (JWT)",
110
- "refresh_token": "string (JWT)",
111
- "user": {
112
- "id": "uuid",
113
- "email": "string",
114
- "name": "string"
115
- }
116
- }
117
- }
118
- }
119
- ```
120
-
121
- ### Contract Test (Python)
122
-
123
- ```python
124
- import pytest
125
- from jsonschema import validate
126
-
127
- RESPONSE_SCHEMA = {
128
- "type": "object",
129
- "required": ["access_token", "refresh_token", "user"],
130
- "properties": {
131
- "access_token": {"type": "string", "pattern": "^[A-Za-z0-9-_]+\\.[A-Za-z0-9-_]+\\.[A-Za-z0-9-_]+$"},
132
- "refresh_token": {"type": "string"},
133
- "user": {
134
- "type": "object",
135
- "required": ["id", "email", "name"],
136
- "properties": {
137
- "id": {"type": "string", "format": "uuid"},
138
- "email": {"type": "string", "format": "email"},
139
- "name": {"type": "string"}
140
- }
141
- }
142
- }
143
- }
144
-
145
- def test_login_response_contract():
146
- """Verify login response adheres to contract"""
147
- response = client.post("/api/auth/login", json={
148
- "email": "test@example.com",
149
- "password": "password123"
150
- })
151
-
152
- assert response.status_code == 200
153
-
154
- # Validate response schema
155
- validate(instance=response.json(), schema=RESPONSE_SCHEMA)
156
-
157
- # Validate JWT token format
158
- token = response.json()["access_token"]
159
- assert len(token.split('.')) == 3 # JWT has 3 parts
160
- ```
161
-
162
- ---
163
-
164
- ## 3. AI Agent Utilization
165
-
166
- ### SPEC → Feature Auto-generation
167
-
168
- AI agent automatically converts SPEC Acceptance Criteria to Gherkin Scenarios:
169
-
170
- **SPEC**:
171
-
172
- ```markdown
173
- ### REQ-001: User Login
174
- **WHEN** login with valid credentials
175
- **THEN** receive JWT token
176
-
177
- #### Acceptance Criteria
178
- - [ ] Login with email and password
179
- - [ ] Return access_token and refresh_token
180
- - [ ] Invalid credentials return 400 error
181
- ```
182
-
183
- **Generated Feature**:
184
-
185
- ```gherkin
186
- Scenario: Successful login with valid credentials
187
- Given user is registered
188
- When login with valid email and password
189
- Then receive JWT access_token
190
- And receive JWT refresh_token
191
- ```
192
-
193
- ### API Schema → Contract Auto-generation
194
-
195
- AI agent automatically converts SPEC API contracts to Contract tests:
196
-
197
- **SPEC**:
198
-
199
- ```markdown
200
- ### Endpoint: Login
201
- POST /api/auth/login
202
- Request: { email, password }
203
- Response: { access_token, refresh_token, user }
204
- ```
205
-
206
- **Generated Contract Test**:
207
-
208
- ```python
209
- def test_login_contract():
210
- response = client.post("/api/auth/login", json=valid_credentials)
211
- assert response.status_code == 200
212
- validate(response.json(), LOGIN_RESPONSE_SCHEMA)
213
- ```
214
-
215
- ---
216
-
217
- ## 4. Vibe Commands
218
-
219
- ### Generate Feature File
220
-
221
- ```bash
222
- vibe feature "user login"
223
- # → Creates .claude/vibe/features/user-login.feature
224
- ```
225
-
226
- ### Generate Contract Test
227
-
228
- ```bash
229
- vibe contract "user login"
230
- # → Creates tests/contract/test_user_login_contract.py
231
- ```
232
-
233
- ### Run Tests
234
-
235
- ```bash
236
- vibe test "user login"
237
- # → Runs BDD + Contract tests
238
- ```
239
-
240
- ### Verify
241
-
242
- ```bash
243
- vibe verify "user login"
244
- # → Confirms 100% SPEC Acceptance Criteria met
245
- ```
246
-
247
- ---
248
-
249
- ## 5. Best Practices
250
-
251
- ### ✅ DO
252
-
253
- 1. **Write SPEC first** → Feature → Contract → Implementation
254
- 2. **Clearly separate Given-When-Then**
255
- 3. **Be specific with contracts** (specify types, formats, constraints)
256
- 4. **Independent scenarios** (can run in any order)
257
- 5. **Include error cases** (Happy path + Sad path)
258
-
259
- ### ❌ DON'T
260
-
261
- 1. **Don't expose implementation details** (keep in Step Definitions only)
262
- 2. **Don't confuse with UI testing** (BDD is for business logic)
263
- 3. **Don't overuse Background** (only for deduplication)
264
- 4. **Don't allow contract violations** (version up on schema changes)
265
-
266
- ---
267
-
268
- ## 6. Coverage Mapping
269
-
270
- | SPEC REQ | Feature Scenario | Contract Test | Implementation | Status |
271
- |----------|------------------|---------------|----------------|--------|
272
- | REQ-001 | ✅ Scenario 1, 2 | ✅ test_login_contract | ✅ POST /api/auth/login | ✅ |
273
- | REQ-002 | ✅ Scenario 3 | ✅ test_refresh_contract | ⬜ POST /api/auth/refresh | ⬜ |
274
-
275
- **Coverage**: 1 / 2 (50%)
276
-
277
- ---
278
-
279
- ## 7. CI/CD Integration
280
-
281
- ```yaml
282
- # .github/workflows/test.yml
283
- name: BDD + Contract Tests
284
-
285
- on: [pull_request]
286
-
287
- jobs:
288
- test:
289
- runs-on: ubuntu-latest
290
- steps:
291
- - uses: actions/checkout@v2
292
-
293
- - name: Run BDD tests
294
- run: pytest tests/features/ -v --gherkin-terminal-reporter
295
-
296
- - name: Run Contract tests
297
- run: pytest tests/contract/ -v
298
-
299
- - name: Upload coverage
300
- run: |
301
- pytest --cov=app --cov-report=xml
302
- codecov -f coverage.xml
303
- ```
304
-
305
- ---
306
-
307
- ## 8. Examples
308
-
309
- ### Python (FastAPI)
310
-
311
- ```bash
312
- # Project structure
313
- project/
314
- ├── tests/
315
- │ ├── features/ # Gherkin feature files
316
- │ │ └── login.feature
317
- │ ├── step_defs/ # Step definitions
318
- │ │ └── test_login.py
319
- │ └── contract/ # Contract tests
320
- │ └── test_login_contract.py
321
- ```
322
-
323
- ### Flutter (Dart)
324
-
325
- ```bash
326
- # Project structure
327
- project/
328
- ├── integration_test/
329
- │ ├── features/ # Gherkin feature files
330
- │ │ └── login.feature
331
- │ └── step_definitions/ # Step definitions
332
- │ └── login_test.dart
333
- └── test/
334
- └── contract/ # Contract tests
335
- └── login_contract_test.dart
336
- ```
337
-
338
- ### React (TypeScript)
339
-
340
- ```bash
341
- # Project structure
342
- project/
343
- ├── tests/
344
- │ ├── features/ # Gherkin feature files
345
- │ │ └── login.feature
346
- │ ├── steps/ # Step definitions
347
- │ │ └── login.steps.ts
348
- │ └── contract/ # Contract tests
349
- │ └── login.contract.test.ts
350
- ```
351
-
352
- ---
353
-
354
- ## 9. Tools & Frameworks
355
-
356
- ### BDD
357
-
358
- | Language | Framework |
359
- |----------|-----------|
360
- | Python | pytest-bdd, behave |
361
- | JavaScript | Cucumber.js, Jest-Cucumber |
362
- | TypeScript | Cucumber.js, Playwright |
363
- | Dart | flutter_gherkin |
364
- | Java | Cucumber-JVM |
365
- | Ruby | Cucumber |
366
-
367
- ### Contract Testing
368
-
369
- | Type | Framework |
370
- |------|-----------|
371
- | Consumer-Driven | Pact, Spring Cloud Contract |
372
- | Provider | Postman, Dredd |
373
- | Schema Validation | JSON Schema, Zod, Ajv |
374
- | Mock Server | MSW, WireMock, http-mock-adapter |
375
-
376
- ---
377
-
378
- ## Summary
379
-
380
- BDD + Contract Testing enables **AI agents to accurately implement SPECs and automatically verify**:
381
-
382
- 1. **Clear requirements** → Express business language with Gherkin
383
- 2. **Contract-based development** → Independent Frontend/Backend development with API schema
384
- 3. **Automated verification** → Immediately verify AI-generated code quality
385
- 4. **Regression prevention** → Protect existing functionality
386
-
387
- **Usage in Vibe**:
388
-
389
- ```bash
390
- vibe spec "feature" → vibe feature "feature" → vibe contract "feature" → vibe run
391
- ```
392
-
393
- **Test-First → AI Implementation → Verify → Done** 🎉
1
+ # BDD + Contract Testing Guide
2
+
3
+ **Testing strategy optimized for AI-driven development**
4
+
5
+ ---
6
+
7
+ ## Overview
8
+
9
+ BDD (Behavior-Driven Development) and Contract Testing are essential for **AI agents to accurately understand requirements and generate verifiable code**.
10
+
11
+ ### Why is it useful for AI-driven development?
12
+
13
+ 1. **Clear input/output contracts** → AI can implement accurately
14
+ 2. **Automated verification** → Immediately verify AI-generated code quality
15
+ 3. **Regression prevention** → AI modifications don't break existing functionality
16
+ 4. **Automated documentation** → Tests serve as executable specifications
17
+
18
+ ---
19
+
20
+ ## Workflow
21
+
22
+ ```
23
+ Write SPEC (Requirements)
24
+
25
+ Generate Feature file (Gherkin)
26
+
27
+ Generate Contract tests (API schema)
28
+
29
+ Run tests (Red)
30
+
31
+ AI agent implementation
32
+
33
+ Run tests (Green)
34
+
35
+ Refactoring
36
+
37
+ Run tests again (Stay Green)
38
+ ```
39
+
40
+ ---
41
+
42
+ ## 1. BDD (Behavior-Driven Development)
43
+
44
+ ### Gherkin Syntax
45
+
46
+ ```gherkin
47
+ Feature: User Login
48
+ As a user
49
+ I want to login
50
+ So that I can access personalized services
51
+
52
+ Scenario: Successful login with valid credentials
53
+ Given user is registered with "test@example.com" and "password123"
54
+ When login is attempted with "test@example.com" and "password123"
55
+ Then login succeeds
56
+ And receives JWT token
57
+ And redirected to home screen
58
+
59
+ Scenario: Failed login with wrong password
60
+ Given user is registered with "test@example.com"
61
+ When login is attempted with "test@example.com" and "wrong-password"
62
+ Then login fails
63
+ And receives "Invalid credentials" error message
64
+ ```
65
+
66
+ ### Step Definitions (Python)
67
+
68
+ ```python
69
+ from pytest_bdd import scenarios, given, when, then, parsers
70
+
71
+ scenarios('features/login.feature')
72
+
73
+ @given(parsers.parse('user is registered with "{email}" and "{password}"'))
74
+ def user_exists(context, email, password):
75
+ context.user = create_user(email=email, password=password)
76
+
77
+ @when(parsers.parse('login is attempted with "{email}" and "{password}"'))
78
+ def attempt_login(context, email, password):
79
+ context.response = login(email=email, password=password)
80
+
81
+ @then('login succeeds')
82
+ def login_succeeds(context):
83
+ assert context.response.status_code == 200
84
+
85
+ @then('receives JWT token')
86
+ def receives_token(context):
87
+ assert 'access_token' in context.response.json()
88
+ ```
89
+
90
+ ---
91
+
92
+ ## 2. Contract Testing
93
+
94
+ ### API Contract Definition
95
+
96
+ ```json
97
+ {
98
+ "request": {
99
+ "method": "POST",
100
+ "path": "/api/auth/login",
101
+ "body": {
102
+ "email": "string (email format)",
103
+ "password": "string (min 8 chars)"
104
+ }
105
+ },
106
+ "response": {
107
+ "status": 200,
108
+ "body": {
109
+ "access_token": "string (JWT)",
110
+ "refresh_token": "string (JWT)",
111
+ "user": {
112
+ "id": "uuid",
113
+ "email": "string",
114
+ "name": "string"
115
+ }
116
+ }
117
+ }
118
+ }
119
+ ```
120
+
121
+ ### Contract Test (Python)
122
+
123
+ ```python
124
+ import pytest
125
+ from jsonschema import validate
126
+
127
+ RESPONSE_SCHEMA = {
128
+ "type": "object",
129
+ "required": ["access_token", "refresh_token", "user"],
130
+ "properties": {
131
+ "access_token": {"type": "string", "pattern": "^[A-Za-z0-9-_]+\\.[A-Za-z0-9-_]+\\.[A-Za-z0-9-_]+$"},
132
+ "refresh_token": {"type": "string"},
133
+ "user": {
134
+ "type": "object",
135
+ "required": ["id", "email", "name"],
136
+ "properties": {
137
+ "id": {"type": "string", "format": "uuid"},
138
+ "email": {"type": "string", "format": "email"},
139
+ "name": {"type": "string"}
140
+ }
141
+ }
142
+ }
143
+ }
144
+
145
+ def test_login_response_contract():
146
+ """Verify login response adheres to contract"""
147
+ response = client.post("/api/auth/login", json={
148
+ "email": "test@example.com",
149
+ "password": "password123"
150
+ })
151
+
152
+ assert response.status_code == 200
153
+
154
+ # Validate response schema
155
+ validate(instance=response.json(), schema=RESPONSE_SCHEMA)
156
+
157
+ # Validate JWT token format
158
+ token = response.json()["access_token"]
159
+ assert len(token.split('.')) == 3 # JWT has 3 parts
160
+ ```
161
+
162
+ ---
163
+
164
+ ## 3. AI Agent Utilization
165
+
166
+ ### SPEC → Feature Auto-generation
167
+
168
+ AI agent automatically converts SPEC Acceptance Criteria to Gherkin Scenarios:
169
+
170
+ **SPEC**:
171
+
172
+ ```markdown
173
+ ### REQ-001: User Login
174
+ **WHEN** login with valid credentials
175
+ **THEN** receive JWT token
176
+
177
+ #### Acceptance Criteria
178
+ - [ ] Login with email and password
179
+ - [ ] Return access_token and refresh_token
180
+ - [ ] Invalid credentials return 400 error
181
+ ```
182
+
183
+ **Generated Feature**:
184
+
185
+ ```gherkin
186
+ Scenario: Successful login with valid credentials
187
+ Given user is registered
188
+ When login with valid email and password
189
+ Then receive JWT access_token
190
+ And receive JWT refresh_token
191
+ ```
192
+
193
+ ### API Schema → Contract Auto-generation
194
+
195
+ AI agent automatically converts SPEC API contracts to Contract tests:
196
+
197
+ **SPEC**:
198
+
199
+ ```markdown
200
+ ### Endpoint: Login
201
+ POST /api/auth/login
202
+ Request: { email, password }
203
+ Response: { access_token, refresh_token, user }
204
+ ```
205
+
206
+ **Generated Contract Test**:
207
+
208
+ ```python
209
+ def test_login_contract():
210
+ response = client.post("/api/auth/login", json=valid_credentials)
211
+ assert response.status_code == 200
212
+ validate(response.json(), LOGIN_RESPONSE_SCHEMA)
213
+ ```
214
+
215
+ ---
216
+
217
+ ## 4. Vibe Commands
218
+
219
+ ### Generate Feature File
220
+
221
+ ```bash
222
+ vibe feature "user login"
223
+ # → Creates .claude/vibe/features/user-login.feature
224
+ ```
225
+
226
+ ### Generate Contract Test
227
+
228
+ ```bash
229
+ vibe contract "user login"
230
+ # → Creates tests/contract/test_user_login_contract.py
231
+ ```
232
+
233
+ ### Run Tests
234
+
235
+ ```bash
236
+ vibe test "user login"
237
+ # → Runs BDD + Contract tests
238
+ ```
239
+
240
+ ### Verify
241
+
242
+ ```bash
243
+ vibe verify "user login"
244
+ # → Confirms 100% SPEC Acceptance Criteria met
245
+ ```
246
+
247
+ ---
248
+
249
+ ## 5. Best Practices
250
+
251
+ ### ✅ DO
252
+
253
+ 1. **Write SPEC first** → Feature → Contract → Implementation
254
+ 2. **Clearly separate Given-When-Then**
255
+ 3. **Be specific with contracts** (specify types, formats, constraints)
256
+ 4. **Independent scenarios** (can run in any order)
257
+ 5. **Include error cases** (Happy path + Sad path)
258
+
259
+ ### ❌ DON'T
260
+
261
+ 1. **Don't expose implementation details** (keep in Step Definitions only)
262
+ 2. **Don't confuse with UI testing** (BDD is for business logic)
263
+ 3. **Don't overuse Background** (only for deduplication)
264
+ 4. **Don't allow contract violations** (version up on schema changes)
265
+
266
+ ---
267
+
268
+ ## 6. Coverage Mapping
269
+
270
+ | SPEC REQ | Feature Scenario | Contract Test | Implementation | Status |
271
+ |----------|------------------|---------------|----------------|--------|
272
+ | REQ-001 | ✅ Scenario 1, 2 | ✅ test_login_contract | ✅ POST /api/auth/login | ✅ |
273
+ | REQ-002 | ✅ Scenario 3 | ✅ test_refresh_contract | ⬜ POST /api/auth/refresh | ⬜ |
274
+
275
+ **Coverage**: 1 / 2 (50%)
276
+
277
+ ---
278
+
279
+ ## 7. CI/CD Integration
280
+
281
+ ```yaml
282
+ # .github/workflows/test.yml
283
+ name: BDD + Contract Tests
284
+
285
+ on: [pull_request]
286
+
287
+ jobs:
288
+ test:
289
+ runs-on: ubuntu-latest
290
+ steps:
291
+ - uses: actions/checkout@v2
292
+
293
+ - name: Run BDD tests
294
+ run: pytest tests/features/ -v --gherkin-terminal-reporter
295
+
296
+ - name: Run Contract tests
297
+ run: pytest tests/contract/ -v
298
+
299
+ - name: Upload coverage
300
+ run: |
301
+ pytest --cov=app --cov-report=xml
302
+ codecov -f coverage.xml
303
+ ```
304
+
305
+ ---
306
+
307
+ ## 8. Examples
308
+
309
+ ### Python (FastAPI)
310
+
311
+ ```bash
312
+ # Project structure
313
+ project/
314
+ ├── tests/
315
+ │ ├── features/ # Gherkin feature files
316
+ │ │ └── login.feature
317
+ │ ├── step_defs/ # Step definitions
318
+ │ │ └── test_login.py
319
+ │ └── contract/ # Contract tests
320
+ │ └── test_login_contract.py
321
+ ```
322
+
323
+ ### Flutter (Dart)
324
+
325
+ ```bash
326
+ # Project structure
327
+ project/
328
+ ├── integration_test/
329
+ │ ├── features/ # Gherkin feature files
330
+ │ │ └── login.feature
331
+ │ └── step_definitions/ # Step definitions
332
+ │ └── login_test.dart
333
+ └── test/
334
+ └── contract/ # Contract tests
335
+ └── login_contract_test.dart
336
+ ```
337
+
338
+ ### React (TypeScript)
339
+
340
+ ```bash
341
+ # Project structure
342
+ project/
343
+ ├── tests/
344
+ │ ├── features/ # Gherkin feature files
345
+ │ │ └── login.feature
346
+ │ ├── steps/ # Step definitions
347
+ │ │ └── login.steps.ts
348
+ │ └── contract/ # Contract tests
349
+ │ └── login.contract.test.ts
350
+ ```
351
+
352
+ ---
353
+
354
+ ## 9. Tools & Frameworks
355
+
356
+ ### BDD
357
+
358
+ | Language | Framework |
359
+ |----------|-----------|
360
+ | Python | pytest-bdd, behave |
361
+ | JavaScript | Cucumber.js, Jest-Cucumber |
362
+ | TypeScript | Cucumber.js, Playwright |
363
+ | Dart | flutter_gherkin |
364
+ | Java | Cucumber-JVM |
365
+ | Ruby | Cucumber |
366
+
367
+ ### Contract Testing
368
+
369
+ | Type | Framework |
370
+ |------|-----------|
371
+ | Consumer-Driven | Pact, Spring Cloud Contract |
372
+ | Provider | Postman, Dredd |
373
+ | Schema Validation | JSON Schema, Zod, Ajv |
374
+ | Mock Server | MSW, WireMock, http-mock-adapter |
375
+
376
+ ---
377
+
378
+ ## Summary
379
+
380
+ BDD + Contract Testing enables **AI agents to accurately implement SPECs and automatically verify**:
381
+
382
+ 1. **Clear requirements** → Express business language with Gherkin
383
+ 2. **Contract-based development** → Independent Frontend/Backend development with API schema
384
+ 3. **Automated verification** → Immediately verify AI-generated code quality
385
+ 4. **Regression prevention** → Protect existing functionality
386
+
387
+ **Usage in Vibe**:
388
+
389
+ ```bash
390
+ vibe spec "feature" → vibe feature "feature" → vibe contract "feature" → vibe run
391
+ ```
392
+
393
+ **Test-First → AI Implementation → Verify → Done** 🎉