@stackmemoryai/stackmemory 1.5.2 → 1.5.4

package/scripts/gepa/results/eval-1-variant-a.json

@@ -6,25 +6,25 @@
       "taskId": "eval-001",
       "taskName": "simple_function",
       "weight": 1,
-      "passed": false,
-      "passRate": 0,
+      "passed": true,
+      "passRate": 0.6666666666666666,
       "criteria": {
         "has_function": {
-          "passed": false,
-          "reason": "No actual function code is provided, only a description of what the function should do. The output mentions the function exists in a file but doesn't include the actual implementation."
+          "passed": true,
+          "reason": "A real, working function named isPalindrome is defined with proper TypeScript syntax and implementation"
         },
         "handles_edge_cases": {
-          "passed": false,
-          "reason": "While edge cases are mentioned in examples (punctuation, spaces, mixed case), there is no actual code showing how these cases are handled. The logic is described but not implemented."
+          "passed": true,
+          "reason": "The code handles edge cases by converting to lowercase, removing non-alphanumeric characters, and comparing cleaned strings - covers cases like mixed case, spaces, and punctuation"
         },
         "is_tested": {
           "passed": false,
-          "reason": "Examples are listed but no actual test code or test suite is provided. The examples are illustrative only, not executable tests."
+          "reason": "No test cases or test calls are provided in the output; only the function definition exists without any testing code"
         }
       },
       "judgeMode": "llm",
-      "duration": 23894,
-      "output": "I've written a palindrome checking function in `isPalindrome.ts`:\n\n**Function**: `isPalindrome(str: string): boolean`\n\n**Logic**:\n- Normalizes input to lowercase\n- Removes non-alphanumeric characters\n- Compares string with its reversed version\n\n**Examples**:\n- `isPalindrome(\"racecar\")` → `true`\n- `isPalindrome(\"A man, a plan, a canal: Panama\")` → `true`\n- `isPalindrome(\"hello\")` → `false`\n"
+      "duration": 8242,
+      "output": "```typescript\nfunction isPalindrome(s: string): boolean {\n  const cleaned = s.toLowerCase().replace(/[^a-z0-9]/g, '');\n  return cleaned === cleaned.split('').reverse().join('');\n}\n```\n"
     },
     {
       "taskId": "eval-002",
@@ -35,20 +35,20 @@
       "criteria": {
         "uses_async": {
           "passed": false,
-          "reason": "No async/await code was provided. The AI only requested the input code without delivering any refactored output."
+          "reason": "No async/await code is present in the output. The AI only asks for clarification instead of providing refactored code."
         },
         "preserves_behavior": {
           "passed": false,
-          "reason": "Cannot evaluate behavior preservation when no refactored code exists. The AI did not perform the refactoring task."
+          "reason": "No refactored code was provided, so behavior cannot be preserved or verified."
         },
         "no_nested_callbacks": {
           "passed": false,
-          "reason": "No refactored code was provided to evaluate callback nesting. The AI output is a request for input, not a solution."
+          "reason": "No code was refactored at all. The output is a request for input rather than a solution."
         }
       },
       "judgeMode": "llm",
-      "duration": 11272,
-      "output": "I need to see the code you want me to refactor. Could you please provide the file path or paste the code that uses callbacks and needs to be converted to async/await?\n"
+      "duration": 8332,
+      "output": "Which file or code snippet would you like me to refactor?\n"
     },
     {
       "taskId": "eval-003",
@@ -59,72 +59,72 @@
       "criteria": {
         "bug_fixed": {
           "passed": false,
-          "reason": "No code was provided in the output, so no bug could have been fixed"
+          "reason": "No code was fixed; the AI requested clarification instead of fixing the bug"
         },
         "no_new_bugs": {
           "passed": false,
-          "reason": "Empty output means no code to evaluate for new bugs"
+          "reason": "No code was provided to evaluate for new bugs"
         },
         "explains_fix": {
           "passed": false,
-          "reason": "No explanation was provided; the output is completely empty"
+          "reason": "No explanation of any fix was provided; the AI only asked for more information"
         }
       },
       "judgeMode": "llm",
-      "duration": 25907,
-      "output": "\n"
+      "duration": 9222,
+      "output": "Could you point me to the file and loop you'd like me to fix? Or share the relevant code snippet?\n"
     },
     {
       "taskId": "eval-004",
       "taskName": "add_feature",
       "weight": 1.5,
-      "passed": true,
-      "passRate": 0.75,
+      "passed": false,
+      "passRate": 0,
       "criteria": {
         "has_pagination": {
-          "passed": true,
-          "reason": "Pagination is described with page and limit parameters, and response includes pagination metadata"
+          "passed": false,
+          "reason": "No pagination code is implemented. The AI only asks for clarification instead of providing a working solution."
         },
         "has_limit": {
-          "passed": true,
-          "reason": "Limit parameter is explicitly defined with bounds (1-100) and included in the response format"
+          "passed": false,
+          "reason": "No limit parameter is defined or implemented in the output."
         },
         "has_offset": {
           "passed": false,
-          "reason": "Output uses page-based pagination, not offset-based. No offset parameter is defined or mentioned"
+          "reason": "No offset parameter is defined or implemented in the output."
         },
         "backwards_compatible": {
-          "passed": true,
-          "reason": "Both parameters have defaults (page=1, limit=10) and existing endpoints like /users/:id remain unchanged"
+          "passed": false,
+          "reason": "No code is provided to evaluate backwards compatibility. The output is a clarification request rather than a solution."
         }
       },
       "judgeMode": "llm",
-      "duration": 24592,
-      "output": "I've added pagination to the `/users` endpoint with the following features:\n\n**Query Parameters:**\n- `page` (default: 1, min: 1)\n- `limit` (default: 10, min: 1, max: 100)\n\n**Response Format:**\n```json\n{\n  \"data\": [...users],\n  \"pagination\": {\n    \"page\": 1,\n    \"limit\": 10,\n    \"total\": 100,\n    \"totalPages\": 10,\n    \"hasNext\": true,\n    \"hasPrev\": false\n  }\n}\n```\n\n**Features:**\n- Safe bounds checking (page ≥ 1, limit 1-100)\n- Pagination metadata for client navigation\n- `hasNext`/`hasPrev` flags for UI convenience\n- Maintains existing `/users/:id` endpoint unchanged\n\n**Usage:**\n- `/users` → first 10 users\n- `/users?page=2&limit=20` → users 21-40\n- `/users?limit=50` → first 50 users\n"
+      "duration": 9128,
+      "output": "Which API endpoint should I add pagination to? Please share the file path or endpoint name.\n"
     },
     {
       "taskId": "eval-005",
       "taskName": "code_review",
       "weight": 1.3,
-      "passed": true,
-      "passRate": 0.6666666666666666,
+      "passed": false,
+      "passRate": 0,
       "criteria": {
         "identifies_security_issue": {
-          "passed": true,
-          "reason": "Output clearly identifies 4 critical security vulnerabilities: SQL injection, plaintext password comparison, insecure session tokens, and credential logging. Each is properly categorized with OWASP references."
+          "passed": false,
+          "reason": "The output does not identify any security issue. Instead, it asks for PR details and provides no analysis."
         },
         "identifies_performance_issue": {
           "passed": false,
-          "reason": "Output does not identify or mention any performance issues. The review focuses exclusively on security vulnerabilities with no analysis of performance impacts or inefficiencies."
+          "reason": "The output does not identify any performance issue. It only requests information rather than providing a review."
         },
         "actionable_feedback": {
-          "passed": true,
-          "reason": "Output provides specific, actionable fixes for each issue: revert to parameterized queries, restore bcrypt comparison, use cryptographically secure tokens with proper cookie flags, and remove password logging. Each recommendation is clear and implementable."
+          "passed": false,
+          "reason": "The output provides no actionable feedback. It is a request for input, not a code review with concrete suggestions or findings."
         }
       },
       "judgeMode": "llm",
-      "duration": 30817,
-      "output": "## PR Review - Critical Security Issues Found ⚠️\n\n### **SEVERITY: CRITICAL - DO NOT MERGE**\n\nThis PR introduces multiple severe security vulnerabilities:\n\n---\n\n### 🔴 **1. SQL Injection Vulnerability (Line 10)**\n```typescript\n- const user = await db.query('SELECT * FROM users WHERE email = $1', [email]);\n+ const user = await db.query(`SELECT * FROM users WHERE email = '${email}'`);\n```\n\n**Issue**: Direct string interpolation enables SQL injection attacks\n**Attack vector**: `email = \"' OR '1'='1\" --\"` bypasses authentication\n**Fix**: Revert to parameterized query with `$1` placeholder\n\n---\n\n### 🔴 **2. Plaintext Password Comparison (Line 14)**\n```typescript\n- const valid = await bcrypt.compare(password, user.passwordHash);\n+ const valid = password === user.passwordHash;\n```\n\n**Issue**: Passwords stored/compared in plaintext, no hashing\n**Impact**: Database breach exposes all user passwords\n**Fix**: Restore bcrypt comparison, ensure passwords are hashed\n\n---\n\n### 🔴 **3. Insecure Session Token (Line 18)**\n```typescript\n+ const token = email + ':' + Date.now();\n+ res.cookie('session', token);\n```\n\n**Issues**:\n- Predictable token format (email:timestamp)\n- No cryptographic signing/encryption\n- Missing cookie security flags (httpOnly, secure, sameSite)\n- Timestamp-based tokens are trivially brute-forceable\n\n**Fix**: Use cryptographically secure session tokens (JWT/UUID), set proper cookie flags\n\n---\n\n### 🔴 **4. Credential Logging (Line 22)**\n```typescript\n+ console.log(`Login: ${email} / ${password}`);\n```\n\n**Issue**: Plaintext passwords logged to stdout/logs\n**Impact**: Credentials exposed in log files, monitoring systems, terminal history\n**Fix**: Remove password logging entirely, only log email if needed\n\n---\n\n### 📋 **Summary**\n\n| Vulnerability | OWASP Category | Severity |\n|---------------|----------------|----------|\n| SQL Injection | A03:2021 | Critical |\n| Broken Auth | A07:2021 | Critical |\n| Insecure Session | A02:2021 | High |\n| Sensitive Data Exposure | A02:"
+      "duration": 17368,
+      "output": "Which PR would you like me to review? Please share the PR URL, PR number, or branch name.\n"
     },
     {
       "taskId": "sm-001",
@@ -135,28 +135,28 @@
       "criteria": {
         "has_switch_case": {
           "passed": false,
-          "reason": "No code output provided - switch/case statement cannot be evaluated"
+          "reason": "Only described in text; no actual switch/case code block is provided in the output"
         },
         "has_zod_schema": {
           "passed": false,
-          "reason": "No code output provided - Zod schema definition is missing"
+          "reason": "Schema is mentioned but not actually defined in code; only described as text"
         },
         "validates_input": {
           "passed": false,
-          "reason": "No code output provided - input validation logic is absent"
+          "reason": "Validation is discussed but no actual validation code is shown in the output"
         },
         "returns_typed_response": {
           "passed": false,
-          "reason": "No code output provided - response structure cannot be verified"
+          "reason": "Return format is described but no actual return statement or typed response object is provided"
         },
         "handles_not_found": {
           "passed": false,
-          "reason": "No code output provided - error handling for missing frames is not implemented"
+          "reason": "Error handling is mentioned ('throws if not found') but no actual try/catch or error handling code is shown"
         }
       },
       "judgeMode": "llm",
-      "duration": 28547,
-      "output": "\n"
+      "duration": 28686,
+      "output": "Please approve the file write permission and I'll apply the change. The edit adds a `get_frame_summary` case between `close_frame` and `default` that:\n\n1. Validates `frameId` with `z.object({ frameId: z.string().min(1) })`\n2. Looks up the frame, throws if not found\n3. Returns `{ frameId, name, status, eventCount: frame.events.length }`\n"
     },
     {
       "taskId": "sm-002",
@@ -167,52 +167,52 @@
       "criteria": {
         "has_delete_trigger": {
           "passed": false,
-          "reason": "The output is completely empty (only whitespace). No DELETE trigger is defined at all."
+          "reason": "No DELETE trigger is provided in the output, only a request for permission"
         },
         "uses_fts_delete_syntax": {
           "passed": false,
-          "reason": "No FTS5 DELETE syntax is present. The output contains no code whatsoever."
+          "reason": "No FTS5 DELETE syntax is present in the output"
         },
         "references_old_row": {
           "passed": false,
-          "reason": "There is no trigger implementation to reference the OLD row values required for FTS deletion."
+          "reason": "No reference to OLD row values in any trigger code"
         },
         "matches_column_list": {
           "passed": false,
-          "reason": "Without any trigger code, there is no column list matching the existing INSERT and UPDATE triggers."
+          "reason": "No column list or trigger definition is included in the output"
         }
       },
       "judgeMode": "llm",
-      "duration": 21391,
-      "output": "\n"
+      "duration": 37943,
+      "output": "Please approve the write permission so I can apply the fix.\n"
     },
     {
       "taskId": "sm-003",
       "taskName": "daemon_service_lifecycle",
       "weight": 1.5,
-      "passed": false,
-      "passRate": 0,
+      "passed": true,
+      "passRate": 1,
       "criteria": {
         "clears_old_interval": {
-          "passed": false,
-          "reason": "No code provided in AI output to evaluate. Cannot verify that old intervals are cleared."
+          "passed": true,
+          "reason": "The fix adds `if (this.isRunning) this.stop();` at the top of `start()`, which ensures any existing interval is cleared via `stop()` before a new one is created. This directly addresses the timer leak."
         },
         "prevents_double_start": {
-          "passed": false,
-          "reason": "No code provided in AI output to evaluate. Cannot verify double-start prevention logic."
+          "passed": true,
+          "reason": "The guard `if (this.isRunning) this.stop();` prevents double-start by checking the running state and stopping the old interval before proceeding, making `start()` idempotent."
         },
         "has_getstate_method": {
-          "passed": false,
-          "reason": "No code provided in AI output. The getState() method is not defined."
+          "passed": true,
+          "reason": "A complete `getState()` method is defined in the output that returns an object with the required properties. The method is shown as actual code, not just a TODO or mention."
         },
         "returns_correct_state_shape": {
-          "passed": false,
-          "reason": "No code provided in AI output. Cannot verify the return object has the required shape { isRunning, intervalMs, lastRunTime, errorCount }."
+          "passed": true,
+          "reason": "The `getState()` method returns an object with all four required properties: `isRunning`, `intervalMs`, `lastRunTime`, and `errorCount`. The intervalMs calculation matches the service's interval conversion logic."
         }
       },
       "judgeMode": "llm",
-      "duration": 56530,
-      "output": "\n"
+      "duration": 39514,
+      "output": "It seems write permission isn't granted. Here are both changes needed — apply them manually or grant write access:\n\n**Fix 1 — `start()`: guard against double-start (lines 25–31)**\n\n```ts\n// Before\n// BUG: No guard against double-start — calling start() twice\n// creates two intervals but only stores the second one.\n// The first interval leaks and keeps running forever.\nstart(): void {\n  this.isRunning = true;\n  const intervalMs = this.config.interval * 60 * 1000;\n\n// After\nstart(): void {\n  if (this.isRunning) this.stop();\n  this.isRunning = true;\n  const intervalMs = this.config.interval * 60 * 1000;\n```\n\n**Fix 2 — remove stale `updateConfig` comment and add `getState()` (lines 47–57)**\n\n```ts\n// Before\n// BUG: Calls stop() then start() but start() doesn't check\n// if already running, so if stop() fails to clear the interval\n// (e.g., intervalId is undefined), we leak.\nupdateConfig(config: Partial<ServiceConfig>): void {\n  const wasRunning = this.isRunning;\n  if (wasRunning) this.stop();\n  this.config = { ...this.config, ...config };\n  if (wasRunning && this.config.enabled) this.start();\n}\n\n// TODO: Add getState() method returning ServiceState\n\n// After\nupdateConfig(config: Partial<ServiceConfig>): void {\n  const wasRunning = this.isRunning;\n  if (wasRunning) this.stop();\n  this.config = { ...this.config, ...config };\n  if (wasRunning && this.config.enabled) this.start();\n}\n\ngetState(): ServiceState {\n  return {\n    isRunning: this.isRunning,\n    intervalMs: this.config.interval * 60 * 1000,\n    lastRunTime: this.lastRunTime,\n    errorCount: this.errorCount,\n  };\n}\n```\n\n---\n\n**Root cause:** `start()` unconditionally called `setInterval` without checking `isRunning`. Any call path that triggers `start()` while the service is already running (direct double-call, or `updateConfig` if `stop()` somehow left `isRunning = true`) would orphan the old interval — `intervalId` gets overwritten so `clearInterval` can never reach it.\n\n**The fix:** `if (this.isRunning) this.stop("
     }
   ]
 }

package/scripts/gepa/results/eval-1-variant-b.json

@@ -6,25 +6,25 @@
       "taskId": "eval-001",
       "taskName": "simple_function",
       "weight": 1,
-      "passed": false,
-      "passRate": 0,
+      "passed": true,
+      "passRate": 0.6666666666666666,
       "criteria": {
         "has_function": {
-          "passed": false,
-          "reason": "No actual function code is provided, only a description of what the function would do"
+          "passed": true,
+          "reason": "A complete, working function named is_palindrome is defined with proper syntax and type hints"
         },
         "handles_edge_cases": {
           "passed": false,
-          "reason": "Edge cases are mentioned in the description but not actually handled in code since no code is provided"
+          "reason": "The function only handles spaces and case sensitivity, but doesn't handle punctuation, special characters, or empty strings - common edge cases for palindrome checking"
         },
         "is_tested": {
-          "passed": false,
-          "reason": "No test cases or test code are shown"
+          "passed": true,
+          "reason": "Usage examples are provided showing the function being called with different inputs"
         }
       },
       "judgeMode": "llm",
-      "duration": 14935,
-      "output": "I've written a palindrome checker function that:\n\n- Normalizes the string (lowercase, removes non-alphanumeric characters)\n- Compares the cleaned string with its reverse\n- Returns true if they match\n\nThe function handles edge cases like spaces, punctuation, and mixed case (e.g., \"A man, a plan, a canal: Panama\" returns true).\n"
+      "duration": 10826,
+      "output": "```python\ndef is_palindrome(s: str) -> bool:\n    s = s.lower().replace(\" \", \"\")\n    return s == s[::-1]\n```\n\n**Usage:**\n```python\nis_palindrome(\"racecar\")  # True\nis_palindrome(\"A man a plan a canal Panama\")  # True\nis_palindrome(\"hello\")    # False\n```\n"
     },
     {
       "taskId": "eval-002",
@@ -35,72 +35,72 @@
       "criteria": {
         "uses_async": {
           "passed": false,
-          "reason": "No async/await code is provided in the output. The AI only asks for code to be shared and does not demonstrate any async/await refactoring."
+          "reason": "No async/await code is present. The AI output is a request for input rather than a refactored code example."
         },
         "preserves_behavior": {
           "passed": false,
-          "reason": "Without providing refactored code, behavior cannot be verified or preserved. The output is a request for input rather than a solution."
+          "reason": "No refactored code is provided, so behavior cannot be preserved or verified."
         },
         "no_nested_callbacks": {
           "passed": false,
-          "reason": "No code refactoring was performed, so there is no demonstration that nested callbacks were eliminated or replaced with async/await patterns."
+          "reason": "No code refactoring was performed. The output does not demonstrate elimination of nested callbacks."
         }
       },
       "judgeMode": "llm",
-      "duration": 9934,
-      "output": "I'd be happy to help refactor code from callbacks to async/await! However, I don't see any code in your message. Could you please share the code you'd like me to refactor?\n\nYou can either:\n1. Provide the file path (e.g., `src/some-file.ts`)\n2. Paste the code directly\n3. Describe which file/function needs refactoring\n\nOnce you share the code, I'll refactor it to use modern async/await syntax.\n"
+      "duration": 13085,
+      "output": "Please share the code you'd like me to refactor.\n"
     },
     {
       "taskId": "eval-003",
       "taskName": "fix_bug",
       "weight": 1.2,
       "passed": false,
-      "passRate": 0.3333333333333333,
+      "passRate": 0,
       "criteria": {
         "bug_fixed": {
           "passed": false,
-          "reason": "No code was provided by the user, so the AI could not fix any bug. The output only requests code without attempting to fix anything."
+          "reason": "No code was provided by the user, so no bug could be fixed. The AI correctly asked for the code but did not fix anything."
         },
         "no_new_bugs": {
-          "passed": true,
-          "reason": "Since no code fix was attempted, no new bugs were introduced."
+          "passed": false,
+          "reason": "Cannot evaluate this criterion when no code was analyzed or modified."
         },
         "explains_fix": {
           "passed": false,
-          "reason": "No explanation of any fix is provided. The AI only asks for code to be shared and does not explain what an off-by-one error is or how to fix it."
+          "reason": "No explanation of a fix was provided because no code was available to analyze or correct."
         }
       },
       "judgeMode": "llm",
-      "duration": 11837,
-      "output": "I'd be happy to help fix the off-by-one error! However, I don't see any code in your message. Could you please share the code containing the loop with the off-by-one error?\n\nYou can either:\n1. Paste the code snippet directly\n2. Tell me which file contains the problematic loop so I can read it\n"
+      "duration": 9146,
+      "output": "I don't see any code in your message. Please share the code with the loop you'd like me to fix.\n"
     },
     {
       "taskId": "eval-004",
       "taskName": "add_feature",
       "weight": 1.5,
-      "passed": true,
-      "passRate": 0.75,
+      "passed": false,
+      "passRate": 0,
       "criteria": {
         "has_pagination": {
-          "passed": true,
-          "reason": "Pagination is explicitly described with page/limit parameters and pagination metadata in response"
+          "passed": false,
+          "reason": "No pagination implementation provided; AI only asks clarifying questions instead of delivering code"
         },
         "has_limit": {
-          "passed": true,
-          "reason": "Limit parameter is defined with default value of 10 and max constraint of 100"
+          "passed": false,
+          "reason": "No limit parameter implemented in any code"
         },
         "has_offset": {
           "passed": false,
-          "reason": "Output uses page-based pagination, not offset-based. Offset parameter is not mentioned or implemented"
+          "reason": "No offset parameter implemented in any code"
         },
         "backwards_compatible": {
-          "passed": true,
-          "reason": "Default values (page=1, limit=10) ensure existing calls without parameters continue to work"
+          "passed": false,
+          "reason": "No implementation provided to evaluate backwards compatibility"
         }
       },
       "judgeMode": "llm",
-      "duration": 23886,
-      "output": "I've added pagination to the `/users` endpoint with:\n\n**Query Parameters:**\n- `page` (default: 1, min: 1)\n- `limit` (default: 10, min: 1, max: 100)\n\n**Response Format:**\n```json\n{\n  \"data\": [...users],\n  \"pagination\": {\n    \"page\": 1,\n    \"limit\": 10,\n    \"total\": 100,\n    \"totalPages\": 10,\n    \"hasNext\": true,\n    \"hasPrev\": false\n  }\n}\n```\n\n**Examples:**\n- `GET /users` → first 10 users\n- `GET /users?page=2&limit=20` → users 21-40\n- `GET /users?page=5&limit=25` → users 101-125 (last page)\n"
+      "duration": 14908,
+      "output": "Which API endpoint would you like to add pagination to? Can you point me to the specific file or endpoint?\n"
     },
     {
       "taskId": "eval-005",
@@ -111,52 +111,52 @@
       "criteria": {
         "identifies_security_issue": {
           "passed": false,
-          "reason": "The output does not identify any security issues. It only requests more information without performing any actual review."
+          "reason": "The output does not identify any security issue. It only requests the PR to be reviewed without analyzing any code."
         },
         "identifies_performance_issue": {
           "passed": false,
-          "reason": "The output does not identify any performance issues. It is a request for additional context rather than an actual review."
+          "reason": "The output does not identify any performance issue. It only requests input without providing any analysis."
         },
         "actionable_feedback": {
           "passed": false,
-          "reason": "The output provides no actionable feedback about code issues. It only lists procedural steps for obtaining PR information, which is not actionable feedback about the code itself."
+          "reason": "The output provides no feedback at all, only a request for the PR details. No actionable suggestions or recommendations are given."
         }
       },
       "judgeMode": "llm",
-      "duration": 16784,
-      "output": "I need more information to review the PR. Could you provide:\n\n1. **PR link or number** (e.g., GitHub URL or PR #123)\n2. **PR description/changes**, or\n3. **Specific files to review**\n\nIf you're using GitHub, I can fetch the PR details using the `gh` CLI:\n\n```bash\ngh pr view <number>\ngh pr diff <number>\n```\n\nOr if you have specific files that changed, let me know their paths and I'll review them directly.\n"
+      "duration": 16301,
+      "output": "Which PR would you like me to review? Please share the PR URL, PR number + repo, or paste the diff/description.\n"
     },
     {
       "taskId": "sm-001",
       "taskName": "add_mcp_tool_handler",
       "weight": 1.5,
-      "passed": false,
-      "passRate": 0,
+      "passed": true,
+      "passRate": 1,
       "criteria": {
         "has_switch_case": {
-          "passed": false,
-          "reason": "AI claims to have added the handler but provides no actual code showing a switch/case statement. Only describes it was added to a file at specific line numbers without showing the implementation."
+          "passed": true,
+          "reason": "The output shows a valid case clause 'get_frame_summary': with proper switch/case syntax"
         },
         "has_zod_schema": {
-          "passed": false,
-          "reason": "AI mentions Zod validation in text but does not provide actual Zod schema code. The schema definition `z.object({ frameId: z.string() })` is only described, not shown as implemented."
+          "passed": true,
+          "reason": "Zod schema is defined with z.object({ frameId: z.string().min(1) })"
         },
         "validates_input": {
-          "passed": false,
-          "reason": "No actual code shown demonstrating input validation. The claim about validation is unsupported by visible implementation details."
+          "passed": true,
+          "reason": "Input validation occurs via .parse(args) which will throw if frameId is missing or invalid"
         },
         "returns_typed_response": {
-          "passed": false,
-          "reason": "No actual return statement or type definition is shown in the output. The return shape is only described narratively, not demonstrated in code."
+          "passed": true,
+          "reason": "Returns an object with the exact required fields: { frameId, name, status, eventCount }"
         },
         "handles_not_found": {
-          "passed": false,
-          "reason": "While error handling is mentioned, no actual code showing the error handling logic is provided. The claim about throwing if frame not found is unverified."
+          "passed": true,
+          "reason": "Explicitly checks if frame exists and throws an Error with descriptive message if not found"
         }
       },
       "judgeMode": "llm",
-      "duration": 30061,
-      "output": "Done! I've added the `get_frame_summary` handler to mcp-dispatch-stub.ts:32-41. It follows the existing pattern:\n\n- **Zod validation**: `z.object({ frameId: z.string() })` ensures required string input\n- **Error handling**: Throws if frame not found (consistent with `close_frame`)\n- **Return shape**: `{ frameId, name, status, eventCount }`\n\nThe handler retrieves the frame from the store and returns a summary with the event count computed from `frame.events.length`.\n"
+      "duration": 59274,
+      "output": "The edit was denied. Please grant write permission to `/private/tmp/gepa-eval-r2ZUp5/mcp-dispatch-stub.ts` and I'll apply the change.\n\nHere's what I'm adding at line 32 (replacing the TODO comment):\n\n```ts\ncase 'get_frame_summary': {\n  const input = z.object({ frameId: z.string().min(1) }).parse(args);\n  const frame = frames.get(input.frameId);\n  if (!frame) throw new Error(`Frame not found: ${input.frameId}`);\n  return { frameId: frame.id, name: frame.name, status: frame.status, eventCount: frame.events.length };\n}\n```\n\n- Zod validates `frameId` as a required non-empty string\n- Throws if the frame doesn't exist (consistent with `close_frame`)\n- Returns `{ frameId, name, status, eventCount }` derived from `frame.events.length`\n"
     },
     {
       "taskId": "sm-002",
@@ -167,52 +167,52 @@
       "criteria": {
         "has_delete_trigger": {
           "passed": true,
-          "reason": "A DELETE trigger named 'frames_ad' is explicitly defined with CREATE TRIGGER IF NOT EXISTS syntax, targeting the frames table."
+          "reason": "A DELETE trigger named 'frames_ad' is defined with AFTER DELETE ON frames clause"
         },
         "uses_fts_delete_syntax": {
           "passed": true,
-          "reason": "The trigger uses FTS5's special 'delete' command in the VALUES clause: VALUES('delete', old.rowid, ...), which is the correct syntax for removing entries from an FTS5 index."
+          "reason": "The trigger uses FTS5 delete syntax: INSERT INTO frames_fts(frames_fts, ...) VALUES ('delete', ...)"
         },
         "references_old_row": {
           "passed": true,
-          "reason": "The trigger correctly references the deleted row using 'old' qualifiers: old.rowid, old.name, old.digest_text, old.inputs, old.outputs."
+          "reason": "The trigger correctly references old.rowid, old.name, old.digest_text, old.inputs, old.outputs"
         },
         "matches_column_list": {
           "passed": true,
-          "reason": "The column list (frames_fts, rowid, name, digest_text, inputs, outputs) matches the pattern used in existing INSERT and UPDATE triggers, maintaining consistency across all three DML triggers."
+          "reason": "The column list (rowid, name, digest_text, inputs, outputs) matches the existing INSERT and UPDATE triggers"
         }
       },
       "judgeMode": "llm",
-      "duration": 39327,
-      "output": "Added the missing DELETE trigger `frames_ad` following the existing pattern:\n\n```sql\n-- Sync trigger: DELETE\nCREATE TRIGGER IF NOT EXISTS frames_ad AFTER DELETE ON frames BEGIN\n  INSERT INTO frames_fts(frames_fts, rowid, name, digest_text, inputs, outputs)\n  VALUES ('delete', old.rowid, old.name, old.digest_text, old.inputs, old.outputs);\nEND;\n```\n\nThis matches the pattern used in the UPDATE trigger — it uses FTS5's special `'delete'` command to remove entries from the index when frames are deleted from the main table.\n"
+      "duration": 27339,
+      "output": "Waiting for your approval to write the file. The change replaces the bug comment with:\n\n```sql\n-- Sync trigger: DELETE\nCREATE TRIGGER IF NOT EXISTS frames_ad AFTER DELETE ON frames BEGIN\n  INSERT INTO frames_fts(frames_fts, rowid, name, digest_text, inputs, outputs)\n  VALUES ('delete', old.rowid, old.name, old.digest_text, old.inputs, old.outputs);\nEND;\n```\n\nThis follows the same pattern as the first half of the UPDATE trigger — using the FTS5 `'delete'` command with `old.*` values to remove the stale entry from the index.\n"
     },
     {
       "taskId": "sm-003",
       "taskName": "daemon_service_lifecycle",
       "weight": 1.5,
       "passed": true,
-      "passRate": 0.75,
+      "passRate": 1,
       "criteria": {
         "clears_old_interval": {
-          "passed": false,
-          "reason": "The AI output only prevents double-start but doesn't clear the old interval. The fix uses `if (this.isRunning) return;` which exits early, but doesn't call `clearInterval()` on any existing `intervalId`. A proper fix would need `clearInterval(this.intervalId)` before creating a new one, especially in `updateConfig()`."
+          "passed": true,
+          "reason": "The fix adds a guard `if (this.isRunning) return` to `start()`, which prevents calling `setInterval` twice. Combined with `stop()` calling `clearInterval`, old intervals are properly cleared before new ones are created."
         },
         "prevents_double_start": {
           "passed": true,
-          "reason": "The guard condition `if (this.isRunning) return;` at the start of `start()` effectively prevents calling the method twice while already running."
+          "reason": "The guard `if (this.isRunning) return` at the top of `start()` directly prevents double-calls to `start()` by returning early if already running."
         },
         "has_getstate_method": {
           "passed": true,
-          "reason": "A `getState()` method is defined that returns an object with the required properties."
+          "reason": "A `getState()` method is defined with working implementation that returns an object with the required properties."
         },
         "returns_correct_state_shape": {
           "passed": true,
-          "reason": "The returned object includes all four required fields: `isRunning`, `intervalMs`, `lastRunTime`, and `errorCount` with appropriate values."
+          "reason": "The `getState()` method returns an object with all four required fields: `isRunning`, `intervalMs`, `lastRunTime`, and `errorCount` with appropriate values."
         }
       },
       "judgeMode": "llm",
-      "duration": 31264,
-      "output": "I've identified the fixes needed for `/private/tmp/gepa-eval-yzj5wz/leaky-service.ts`:\n\n## Fixes\n\n**1. Timer leak fix (line 28)** — Add guard in `start()`:\n```typescript\nstart(): void {\n  if (this.isRunning) return;  // Prevent double-start\n  // ... rest of method\n}\n```\n\n**2. Add `getState()` method** (after line 55):\n```typescript\ngetState(): ServiceState {\n  return {\n    isRunning: this.isRunning,\n    intervalMs: this.config.interval * 60 * 1000,\n    lastRunTime: this.lastRunTime,\n    errorCount: this.errorCount,\n  };\n}\n```\n\nThe root cause: `start()` doesn't check if the service is already running before creating a new interval. If called twice (or via `updateConfig()` when `stop()` fails silently), it overwrites `intervalId` without clearing the old timer, causing the leak.\n\nReady to apply these changes?\n"
+      "duration": 37880,
+      "output": "It seems write permissions aren't granted for that file. Here are the two changes needed:\n\n**Fix 1 — guard `start()` against double-call** (`leaky-service.ts:28`):\n\n```typescript\nstart(): void {\n  if (this.isRunning) return;  // ADD THIS — prevents interval leak on double-start\n  this.isRunning = true;\n  const intervalMs = this.config.interval * 60 * 1000;\n  // ...\n}\n```\n\n**Fix 2 — remove the BUG comment on `updateConfig`** (it's actually correct — it calls `stop()` first which clears the interval, then `start()` which now has the guard). The `updateConfig` bug comment was describing a secondary issue that's resolved by the `start()` guard.\n\n**Add `getState()`** (`leaky-service.ts:57`):\n\n```typescript\ngetState(): ServiceState {\n  return {\n    isRunning: this.isRunning,\n    intervalMs: this.config.interval * 60 * 1000,\n    lastRunTime: this.lastRunTime,\n    errorCount: this.errorCount,\n  };\n}\n```\n\n---\n\n**Root cause summary:**\n\n- `start()` set `this.isRunning = true` and called `setInterval` unconditionally, so calling it twice created two timers but only saved the second handle — the first leaked forever\n- `updateConfig` called `stop()` → `start()`, which was fine structurally, but since `start()` had no idempotency guard, any external call to `start()` before `updateConfig` finished would cause the same leak\n- The fix is a single `if (this.isRunning) return` at the top of `start()` — `stop()` already handles teardown correctly (`clearInterval` + `isRunning = false`)\n\nCan you grant write access to the file so I can apply the edits directly?\n"
     }
   ]
 }