@stackmemoryai/stackmemory 1.2.1 → 1.2.2

package/scripts/gepa/optimize.js

@@ -21,6 +21,18 @@ import { fileURLToPath } from 'url';
 import { spawn, execSync } from 'child_process';
 
 const __dirname = path.dirname(fileURLToPath(import.meta.url));
+const PROJECT_ROOT = path.resolve(__dirname, '../..');
+
+// Load .env from project root
+const envPath = path.join(PROJECT_ROOT, '.env');
+if (fs.existsSync(envPath)) {
+  for (const line of fs.readFileSync(envPath, 'utf8').split('\n')) {
+    const match = line.match(/^([A-Z_][A-Z0-9_]*)=(.*)$/);
+    if (match && !process.env[match[1]]) {
+      process.env[match[1]] = match[2].replace(/^["']|["']$/g, '');
+    }
+  }
+}
 
 // Configuration
 const CONFIG_PATH = path.join(__dirname, 'config.json');
@@ -186,6 +198,9 @@ ${strategyPrompts[strategy]}
 EVALUATION FEEDBACK FROM PREVIOUS GENERATIONS:
 ${getRecentFeedback(state)}
 
+REFLECTION INSIGHTS (from failure pattern analysis):
+${getReflectionInsights()}
+
 REQUIREMENTS:
 1. Output ONLY the improved markdown content
 2. Preserve all critical instructions and constraints
@@ -230,17 +245,105 @@ function getRecentFeedback(state) {
     .join('\n');
 }
 
+/**
+ * Load most recent reflection insights for mutation context
+ */
+function getReflectionInsights() {
+  const reflectionFiles = fs.existsSync(RESULTS_DIR)
+    ? fs
+        .readdirSync(RESULTS_DIR)
+        .filter((f) => f.startsWith('reflection-') && f.endsWith('.json'))
+    : [];
+
+  if (reflectionFiles.length === 0) return 'No reflection data yet.';
+
+  // Pick the most recent reflection file
+  reflectionFiles.sort().reverse();
+  const latest = JSON.parse(
+    fs.readFileSync(path.join(RESULTS_DIR, reflectionFiles[0]), 'utf8')
+  );
+
+  const insights = latest.insights;
+  if (!insights) return 'No reflection insights available.';
+
+  const parts = [];
+
+  if (insights.failureModes?.length) {
+    parts.push(`Failure modes: ${insights.failureModes.join('; ')}`);
+  }
+  if (insights.missingInstructions?.length) {
+    parts.push(
+      `Missing instructions: ${insights.missingInstructions.join('; ')}`
+    );
+  }
+  if (insights.unclearInstructions?.length) {
+    parts.push(
+      `Unclear instructions: ${insights.unclearInstructions.join('; ')}`
+    );
+  }
+  if (insights.priorityMutations?.length) {
+    parts.push(
+      `Priority changes:\n${insights.priorityMutations
+        .map((m) => `  - [${m.type}] ${m.section}: ${m.change}`)
+        .join('\n')}`
+    );
+  }
+
+  return parts.join('\n') || 'No actionable insights.';
+}
+
+/**
+ * Call Claude CLI via spawn (stdin pipe, no shell interpolation)
+ */
+function spawnClaude(prompt, { cwd, timeoutMs } = {}) {
+  return new Promise((resolve, reject) => {
+    const args = ['--print'];
+    const child = spawn('claude', args, {
+      cwd,
+      stdio: ['pipe', 'pipe', 'pipe'],
+      env: { ...process.env },
+    });
+
+    let stdout = '';
+    let stderr = '';
+    let killed = false;
+
+    const timer = timeoutMs
+      ? setTimeout(() => {
+          killed = true;
+          child.kill('SIGTERM');
+        }, timeoutMs)
+      : null;
+
+    child.stdout.on('data', (d) => (stdout += d));
+    child.stderr.on('data', (d) => (stderr += d));
+
+    child.on('close', (code) => {
+      if (timer) clearTimeout(timer);
+      if (killed)
+        return reject(new Error(`claude timed out after ${timeoutMs}ms`));
+      if (code !== 0 && !stdout)
+        return reject(new Error(stderr || `claude exited ${code}`));
+      resolve(stdout);
+    });
+
+    child.on('error', (err) => {
+      if (timer) clearTimeout(timer);
+      reject(err);
+    });
+
+    child.stdin.write(prompt);
+    child.stdin.end();
+  });
+}
+
 /**
  * Call Claude API for mutation generation
  */
 async function callClaude(prompt) {
-  // Try using claude CLI first
+  // Try using claude CLI first (stdin pipe, no shell injection)
   try {
-    const result = execSync(`echo ${JSON.stringify(prompt)} | claude --print`, {
-      encoding: 'utf8',
-      maxBuffer: 10 * 1024 * 1024,
-    });
-    return result;
+    return await spawnClaude(prompt);
   } catch (e) {
     // Fallback to API
     const apiKey = process.env.ANTHROPIC_API_KEY;
@@ -310,6 +413,7 @@ async function runEval(variantName) {
     results.push({
       taskId: task.id,
       taskName: task.name,
+      weight: task.weight || 1.0,
       ...result,
     });
   }
@@ -333,10 +437,11 @@ async function runEval(variantName) {
  */
 async function runSingleEval(task, variantPath) {
   const startTime = Date.now();
+  let tempDir;
 
   try {
     // Create temp project with variant as CLAUDE.md
-    const tempDir = fs.mkdtempSync('/tmp/gepa-eval-');
+    tempDir = fs.mkdtempSync('/tmp/gepa-eval-');
     fs.copyFileSync(variantPath, path.join(tempDir, 'CLAUDE.md'));
 
     // Copy fixture if needed
@@ -350,20 +455,20 @@ async function runSingleEval(task, variantPath) {
       }
     }
 
-    // Run claude with the task prompt
-    const result = execSync(
-      `cd ${tempDir} && echo ${JSON.stringify(task.prompt)} | timeout ${config.evals.timeout / 1000} claude --print 2>&1 || true`,
-      { encoding: 'utf8', maxBuffer: 10 * 1024 * 1024 }
-    );
-
-    // Evaluate result against expected outcomes
-    const passed = evaluateExpectations(result, task.expected);
+    // Run claude via spawn with Node-native timeout (no GNU timeout needed)
+    const result = await spawnClaude(task.prompt, {
+      cwd: tempDir,
+      timeoutMs: config.evals.timeout,
+    });
 
-    // Cleanup
-    fs.rmSync(tempDir, { recursive: true, force: true });
+    // Evaluate result against expected outcomes (LLM judge with regex fallback)
+    const evaluation = await evaluateExpectations(result, task.expected, task);
 
     return {
-      passed,
+      passed: evaluation.passed,
+      passRate: evaluation.passRate,
+      criteria: evaluation.criteria,
+      judgeMode: evaluation.judgeMode,
       duration: Date.now() - startTime,
       output: result.slice(0, 2000),
     };
@@ -373,49 +478,186 @@ async function runSingleEval(task, variantPath) {
       duration: Date.now() - startTime,
       error: error.message,
     };
+  } finally {
+    if (tempDir) fs.rmSync(tempDir, { recursive: true, force: true });
+  }
+}
+
+/**
+ * Evaluate output against expectations using LLM judge (regex fallback)
+ */
+async function evaluateExpectations(output, expected, task) {
+  if (!expected)
+    return { passed: true, passRate: 1.0, criteria: {}, judgeMode: 'skip' };
+
+  // Try LLM judge first
+  try {
+    const result = await llmJudge(output, expected, task);
+    return { ...result, judgeMode: 'llm' };
+  } catch (e) {
+    console.log(`    LLM judge failed (${e.message}), using regex fallback`);
+    const result = regexJudge(output, expected);
+    return { ...result, judgeMode: 'regex' };
+  }
+}
+
+/**
+ * LLM-as-judge — uses a fast model to evaluate output against criteria
+ */
+async function llmJudge(output, expected, task) {
+  const criteriaList = Object.entries(expected)
+    .map(
+      ([key, value]) =>
+        `- ${key}: ${typeof value === 'string' ? value : 'should be ' + value}`
+    )
+    .join('\n');
+
+  const judgePrompt = `You are a strict code evaluation judge. Evaluate whether the AI output satisfies each criterion.
+
+TASK GIVEN TO AI:
+${task.prompt}
+
+AI OUTPUT:
+\`\`\`
+${output.slice(0, 6000)}
+\`\`\`
+
+CRITERIA TO EVALUATE:
+${criteriaList}
+
+For each criterion, determine if the output genuinely satisfies it. Be strict:
+- "has_function" means a real, working function is defined (not just mentioned)
+- "bug_fixed" means the actual bug is corrected (not just discussed)
+- "handles_edge_cases" means edge cases are actually handled in code
+- "explains_fix" means there's a clear explanation of what was wrong and why
+
+Respond with ONLY this JSON (no markdown fences):
+{
+  "criteria": {
+    "criterion_name": {"passed": true, "reason": "brief explanation"},
+    "criterion_name": {"passed": false, "reason": "brief explanation"}
   }
+}`;
+
+  const judgeModel = config.judge?.model || 'claude-haiku-4-5-20251001';
+  const raw = await callJudge(judgePrompt, judgeModel);
+
+  // Extract JSON from response
+  const jsonMatch = raw.match(/\{[\s\S]*\}/);
+  if (!jsonMatch) throw new Error('No JSON in judge response');
+
+  const parsed = JSON.parse(jsonMatch[0]);
+  const criteria = parsed.criteria || {};
+  const entries = Object.values(criteria);
+  const passedCount = entries.filter((c) => c.passed).length;
+  const passRate = entries.length > 0 ? passedCount / entries.length : 0;
+
+  return {
+    passed: passRate >= 0.6,
+    passRate,
+    criteria,
+  };
 }
 
 /**
- * Evaluate output against expectations
+ * Call judge model via Anthropic API (fast, cheap model for evaluation)
  */
-function evaluateExpectations(output, expected) {
-  if (!expected) return true;
+async function callJudge(prompt, model) {
+  const apiKey = process.env.ANTHROPIC_API_KEY;
 
-  const checks = Object.entries(expected).map(([key, value]) => {
-    // Simple heuristic checks
+  if (apiKey) {
+    const response = await fetch('https://api.anthropic.com/v1/messages', {
+      method: 'POST',
+      headers: {
+        'Content-Type': 'application/json',
+        'x-api-key': apiKey,
+        'anthropic-version': '2023-06-01',
+      },
+      body: JSON.stringify({
+        model,
+        max_tokens: 2000,
+        messages: [{ role: 'user', content: prompt }],
+      }),
+    });
+
+    if (!response.ok) {
+      throw new Error(`Judge API error: ${response.status}`);
+    }
+
+    const data = await response.json();
+    return data.content[0].text;
+  }
+
+  // Fallback to CLI
+  return await spawnClaude(prompt, { timeoutMs: 30000 });
+}
+
+/**
+ * Regex fallback judge (used when LLM judge is unavailable)
+ */
+function regexJudge(output, expected) {
+  const criteria = {};
+
+  for (const [key, value] of Object.entries(expected)) {
+    let passed = false;
     switch (key) {
       case 'has_function':
-        return /function\s+\w+|const\s+\w+\s*=\s*(\([^)]*\)|async)?\s*(=>|\{)/.test(
-          output
-        );
+        passed =
+          /function\s+\w+|const\s+\w+\s*=\s*(\([^)]*\)|async)?\s*(=>|\{)/.test(
+            output
+          );
+        break;
       case 'handles_edge_cases':
-        return /if\s*\(|edge|empty|null|undefined|\.length/.test(output);
+        passed = /if\s*\(|edge|empty|null|undefined|\.length/.test(output);
+        break;
       case 'uses_async':
-        return /async|await|Promise/.test(output);
+        passed = /async|await|Promise/.test(output);
+        break;
       case 'no_nested_callbacks':
-        return !/callback\s*\(\s*function|\.then\s*\([^)]*\.then/.test(output);
+        passed = !/callback\s*\(\s*function|\.then\s*\([^)]*\.then/.test(
+          output
+        );
+        break;
       case 'bug_fixed':
-        return /fix|correct|change|update/i.test(output);
+        passed = /fix|correct|change|update/i.test(output);
+        break;
       case 'explains_fix':
-        return (
+        passed =
           output.length > 200 &&
-          /because|since|the issue|the problem/i.test(output)
-        );
+          /because|since|the issue|the problem/i.test(output);
+        break;
       default:
-        return output.toLowerCase().includes(key.toLowerCase());
+        passed = output.toLowerCase().includes(key.toLowerCase());
     }
-  });
+    criteria[key] = { passed, reason: 'regex heuristic' };
+  }
 
-  return checks.filter(Boolean).length / checks.length >= 0.6;
+  const entries = Object.values(criteria);
+  const passedCount = entries.filter((c) => c.passed).length;
+  const passRate = entries.length > 0 ? passedCount / entries.length : 0;
+
+  return { passed: passRate >= 0.6, passRate, criteria };
 }
 
 /**
- * Calculate weighted score
+ * Calculate weighted score using task weights and per-criterion pass rates
  */
 function calculateScore(results) {
-  const passed = results.filter((r) => r.passed).length;
-  return passed / results.length;
+  if (results.length === 0) return 0;
+
+  let weightedSum = 0;
+  let totalWeight = 0;
+
+  for (const r of results) {
+    const weight = r.weight || 1.0;
+    // Use passRate for partial credit when available (LLM judge),
+    // fall back to binary passed for regex judge
+    const score = r.passRate !== undefined ? r.passRate : r.passed ? 1.0 : 0.0;
+    weightedSum += score * weight;
+    totalWeight += weight;
+  }
+
+  return totalWeight > 0 ? weightedSum / totalWeight : 0;
 }
 
 /**

package/scripts/gepa/results/eval-1-baseline.json

@@ -5,37 +5,214 @@
     {
       "taskId": "eval-001",
       "taskName": "simple_function",
+      "weight": 1,
       "passed": false,
-      "duration": 6,
-      "output": "/bin/sh: timeout: command not found\n"
+      "passRate": 0,
+      "criteria": {
+        "has_function": {
+          "passed": false,
+          "reason": "No actual function code is provided. The output only describes what the function should do and mentions it exists, but doesn't show the real implementation."
+        },
+        "handles_edge_cases": {
+          "passed": false,
+          "reason": "While edge cases are mentioned in the description, no actual code is provided to verify they are genuinely handled in the implementation."
+        },
+        "is_tested": {
+          "passed": false,
+          "reason": "Tests are only mentioned/described, not actually provided. The AI says it 'will run the tests' after approval, meaning tests don't currently exist in the output."
+        }
+      },
+      "judgeMode": "llm",
+      "duration": 20953,
+      "output": "I've created a palindrome checker function with the following features:\n\n**`isPalindrome(str: string): boolean`**\n- Returns `true` if the string reads the same forwards and backwards\n- Case-insensitive\n- Ignores spaces and non-alphanumeric characters\n- Handles edge cases (single character, empty string)\n\nThe implementation:\n1. Converts to lowercase\n2. Removes non-alphanumeric characters\n3. Compares with reversed version\n\nI've also included comprehensive tests covering:\n- Simple palindromes (racecar, level)\n- Non-palindromes\n- Case variations\n- Strings with spaces/punctuation\n- Edge cases\n\nOnce you approve the file writes, I'll run the tests to verify everything works correctly.\n"
     },
     {
       "taskId": "eval-002",
       "taskName": "refactor_code",
+      "weight": 1.5,
       "passed": false,
-      "duration": 5,
-      "output": "/bin/sh: timeout: command not found\n"
+      "passRate": 0,
+      "criteria": {
+        "uses_async": {
+          "passed": false,
+          "reason": "No async/await code is provided in the output. The AI only requests the code but doesn't provide any refactored example."
+        },
+        "preserves_behavior": {
+          "passed": false,
+          "reason": "No refactored code is present to evaluate whether behavior is preserved. The output is a request for input rather than a solution."
+        },
+        "no_nested_callbacks": {
+          "passed": false,
+          "reason": "No code with callback elimination is demonstrated. The output contains no actual refactoring work."
+        }
+      },
+      "judgeMode": "llm",
+      "duration": 13171,
+      "output": "I'd be happy to help refactor callback-based code to use async/await! However, I don't see any code in your message.\n\nCould you please share the code you'd like me to refactor? You can either:\n1. Paste the code directly\n2. Provide the file path if it's in the current project\n\nOnce you share the code, I'll refactor it to use modern async/await syntax.\n"
     },
     {
       "taskId": "eval-003",
       "taskName": "fix_bug",
+      "weight": 1.2,
       "passed": false,
-      "duration": 5,
-      "output": "/bin/sh: timeout: command not found\n"
+      "passRate": 0.3333333333333333,
+      "criteria": {
+        "bug_fixed": {
+          "passed": false,
+          "reason": "No bug was actually fixed. The AI did not provide corrected code, only asked for clarification about which loop to fix."
+        },
+        "no_new_bugs": {
+          "passed": true,
+          "reason": "No code was provided, so no new bugs could be introduced."
+        },
+        "explains_fix": {
+          "passed": false,
+          "reason": "No explanation of what the off-by-one error was or how to fix it was provided. The AI only requested more information."
+        }
+      },
+      "judgeMode": "llm",
+      "duration": 15457,
+      "output": "I'm in `/private/tmp/gepa-eval-6aqPva` which is not the main StackMemory project directory. Could you please:\n\n1. **Show me the specific file and loop** that has the off-by-one error, or\n2. **Describe where the loop is** (file path, function name), or\n3. **Share the code snippet** with the problematic loop\n\nThis will help me quickly identify and fix the exact issue you're referring to.\n"
     },
     {
       "taskId": "eval-004",
       "taskName": "add_feature",
+      "weight": 1.5,
       "passed": false,
-      "duration": 5,
-      "output": "/bin/sh: timeout: command not found\n"
+      "passRate": 0.5,
+      "criteria": {
+        "has_pagination": {
+          "passed": true,
+          "reason": "Output clearly describes pagination implementation with page parameter and pagination metadata in response"
+        },
+        "has_limit": {
+          "passed": true,
+          "reason": "Output explicitly includes limit parameter with default value of 10 and maximum of 100"
+        },
+        "has_offset": {
+          "passed": false,
+          "reason": "Output uses page-based pagination, not offset-based pagination. No offset parameter is mentioned or implemented"
+        },
+        "backwards_compatible": {
+          "passed": false,
+          "reason": "No actual code implementation provided, only specification. Cannot verify that existing API calls would continue to work without modification. The description doesn't address how pre-existing requests without pagination parameters would be handled"
+        }
+      },
+      "judgeMode": "llm",
+      "duration": 28730,
+      "output": "Added pagination to the `/users` endpoint with:\n\n**Query parameters:**\n- `page` (default: 1) - Current page number\n- `limit` (default: 10, max: 100) - Items per page\n\n**Response format:**\n```json\n{\n  \"data\": [...],\n  \"pagination\": {\n    \"page\": 1,\n    \"limit\": 10,\n    \"total\": 100,\n    \"totalPages\": 10,\n    \"hasNext\": true,\n    \"hasPrev\": false\n  }\n}\n```\n\n**Features:**\n- Default 10 items per page\n- Validates parameters (positive numbers, limit ≤ 100)\n- Returns 400 for invalid inputs\n- Provides pagination metadata for navigation\n\nExample usage:\n- `GET /users?page=1&limit=20`\n- `GET /users?page=2` (uses default limit=10)\n"
     },
     {
       "taskId": "eval-005",
       "taskName": "code_review",
+      "weight": 1.3,
+      "passed": true,
+      "passRate": 0.6666666666666666,
+      "criteria": {
+        "identifies_security_issue": {
+          "passed": true,
+          "reason": "The output identifies multiple genuine security vulnerabilities: SQL injection, plaintext password comparison, predictable token generation, credential logging, missing session storage, and insecure cookie flags. All are real security issues."
+        },
+        "identifies_performance_issue": {
+          "passed": false,
+          "reason": "The output does not identify or discuss any performance issues. The task requires identifying both security AND performance issues, but only security issues are covered."
+        },
+        "actionable_feedback": {
+          "passed": true,
+          "reason": "The output provides specific, actionable fixes for each identified issue, including code examples showing the problematic code and the corrected version. Each recommendation is concrete and implementable."
+        }
+      },
+      "judgeMode": "llm",
+      "duration": 30766,
+      "output": "# PR Review - Critical Security Issues Found\n\n## 🚨 CRITICAL Issues (Must Fix)\n\n### 1. **SQL Injection Vulnerability** (Line 10)\n```typescript\nconst user = await db.query(`SELECT * FROM users WHERE email = '${email}'`);\n```\n**Problem:** Direct string interpolation allows SQL injection attacks. An attacker could use `email = \"' OR '1'='1\"` to bypass authentication.\n\n**Fix:** Revert to parameterized query:\n```typescript\nconst user = await db.query('SELECT * FROM users WHERE email = $1', [email]);\n```\n\n### 2. **Password Storage Vulnerability** (Line 14)\n```typescript\nconst valid = password === user.passwordHash;\n```\n**Problem:** Removed bcrypt comparison, suggesting passwords are stored in plain text or improperly compared. This completely breaks password hashing.\n\n**Fix:** Restore bcrypt comparison:\n```typescript\nconst valid = await bcrypt.compare(password, user.passwordHash);\n```\n\n### 3. **Insecure Session Token** (Line 18)\n```typescript\nconst token = email + ':' + Date.now();\n```\n**Problem:** Predictable token generation allows session hijacking. Tokens should be cryptographically random.\n\n**Fix:** Use secure random token generation:\n```typescript\nconst token = crypto.randomBytes(32).toString('hex');\n```\n\n### 4. **Credential Logging** (Line 22)\n```typescript\nconsole.log(`Login: ${email} / ${password}`);\n```\n**Problem:** Logs plain-text passwords. This violates PII protection and creates a security audit trail.\n\n**Fix:** Remove password logging entirely or log only non-sensitive data:\n```typescript\nconsole.log(`Login attempt: ${email}`);\n```\n\n## ⚠️ High Priority Issues\n\n### 5. **Missing Session Storage**\nThe token is set in a cookie but never stored server-side for validation. Sessions can't be verified.\n\n### 6. **No Cookie Security Flags**\n```typescript\nres.cookie('session', token);\n```\nMissing: `httpOnly`, `secure`, `sameSite` flags.\n\n## Verdict\n\n**❌ REJECT - Do NOT merge this PR**\n\nThis PR introduces multiple critical security vulnerabilities:\n- SQL injection (OWA"
+    },
+    {
+      "taskId": "sm-001",
+      "taskName": "add_mcp_tool_handler",
+      "weight": 1.5,
+      "passed": false,
+      "passRate": 0,
+      "criteria": {
+        "has_switch_case": {
+          "passed": false,
+          "reason": "No actual code is provided, only a description. The claim that it 'fits seamlessly into the existing switch/case pattern' is unverified without seeing the actual implementation."
+        },
+        "has_zod_schema": {
+          "passed": false,
+          "reason": "While Zod validation is mentioned, no actual Zod schema definition or import is shown in the output. Only a parsing call is described."
+        },
+        "validates_input": {
+          "passed": false,
+          "reason": "No actual validation code is provided. The description mentions validation but doesn't show the implementation that would catch and handle invalid inputs."
+        },
+        "returns_typed_response": {
+          "passed": false,
+          "reason": "No TypeScript type definitions or actual return statements are shown. Only the expected fields are listed descriptively."
+        },
+        "handles_not_found": {
+          "passed": false,
+          "reason": "Error handling for missing frames is mentioned but no actual code showing the if/throw pattern is provided to verify the implementation."
+        }
+      },
+      "judgeMode": "llm",
+      "duration": 35873,
+      "output": "I've implemented the `get_frame_summary` MCP tool handler following the existing pattern:\n\n**Implementation details:**\n\n1. **Zod validation**: Uses `z.object({ frameId: z.string() }).parse(args)` to validate the required `frameId` parameter\n2. **Error handling**: Throws descriptive error if frame not found (consistent with `close_frame`)\n3. **Return shape**: Returns exactly the requested fields:\n   - `frameId`: string\n   - `name`: string\n   - `status`: 'open' | 'closed'\n   - `eventCount`: number (computed from `frame.events.length`)\n\nThe handler fits seamlessly into the existing switch/case dispatch pattern between the `close_frame` case and the default error handler.\n"
+    },
+    {
+      "taskId": "sm-002",
+      "taskName": "fix_fts5_trigger_bug",
+      "weight": 1.8,
+      "passed": false,
+      "passRate": 0,
+      "criteria": {
+        "has_delete_trigger": {
+          "passed": false,
+          "reason": "The output describes adding a trigger but provides no actual SQL code. The trigger is discussed but not shown in the output."
+        },
+        "uses_fts_delete_syntax": {
+          "passed": false,
+          "reason": "No actual SQL code is provided to verify that FTS5 'delete' syntax is correctly used. Only a description is given."
+        },
+        "references_old_row": {
+          "passed": false,
+          "reason": "While the output mentions using `old.rowid` and `old.*`, no actual trigger code is shown to verify this is implemented correctly."
+        },
+        "matches_column_list": {
+          "passed": false,
+          "reason": "The output provides no actual trigger code to compare against the existing INSERT and UPDATE triggers' column lists. No verification that columns match."
+        }
+      },
+      "judgeMode": "llm",
+      "duration": 29988,
+      "output": "Done! I've added the missing AFTER DELETE trigger for the FTS5 index.\n\n**Changes made:**\n- Added `frames_ad` trigger that fires AFTER DELETE on frames table\n- Follows the same naming pattern (frames_ai for INSERT, frames_au for UPDATE, frames_ad for DELETE)\n- Uses the FTS5 'delete' command to remove the deleted row from the frames_fts index\n- References `old.rowid` and `old.*` fields to identify the deleted record\n\nThe trigger ensures that when a frame is deleted from the frames table, the corresponding entry is removed from the frames_fts full-text search index, preventing stale data.\n"
+    },
+    {
+      "taskId": "sm-003",
+      "taskName": "daemon_service_lifecycle",
+      "weight": 1.5,
       "passed": false,
-      "duration": 4,
-      "output": "/bin/sh: timeout: command not found\n"
+      "passRate": 0.25,
+      "criteria": {
+        "clears_old_interval": {
+          "passed": false,
+          "reason": "The output only mentions adding a guard check with `if (this.isRunning) return;` but does not show actual code that clears the old interval (e.g., `clearInterval(this.intervalId)`) before starting a new one. The explanation describes preventing double-start, not clearing existing intervals."
+        },
+        "prevents_double_start": {
+          "passed": true,
+          "reason": "The output explicitly mentions adding `if (this.isRunning) return;` guard at line 28, which prevents calling start() multiple times. This is a valid guard clause."
+        },
+        "has_getstate_method": {
+          "passed": false,
+          "reason": "The output only describes what the getState() method should do and mentions it returns a ServiceState object, but no actual function code is provided. A description without implementation does not satisfy the requirement for a real, working method."
+        },
+        "returns_correct_state_shape": {
+          "passed": false,
+          "reason": "While the output mentions that getState() should return isRunning, intervalMs, lastRunTime, and errorCount, no actual code implementation is shown to verify the correct object shape is returned."
+        }
+      },
+      "judgeMode": "llm",
+      "duration": 44474,
+      "output": "I need permission to modify the file. Let me explain the changes I'm making:\n\n## Fix Summary\n\n**Timer Leak Bug:**\n- Added guard in `start()` method (line 28) to check if already running\n- This prevents creating multiple intervals when `start()` is called twice\n\n**New getState() Method:**\n- Returns ServiceState with current runtime information\n- Includes: isRunning, intervalMs, lastRunTime, errorCount\n\nThe fix is simple but critical — without the `if (this.isRunning) return;` check, calling `start()` multiple times creates multiple setInterval timers but only stores the last one. The previous intervals keep running but can't be cleared, causing a memory leak.\n"
     }
   ]
 }