@spaceflow/review 0.67.0 → 0.68.0

package/CHANGELOG.md

@@ -1,5 +1,26 @@
 # Changelog
 
+## [0.67.0](https://github.com/Lydanne/spaceflow/compare/@spaceflow/review@0.66.0...@spaceflow/review@0.67.0) (2026-03-03)
+
+### 新特性
+
+* **shared:** 新增获取扩展依赖函数，过滤内部包 ([86f4864](https://github.com/Lydanne/spaceflow/commit/86f48646c790285797b53c63a463d5134f7ac6b6))
+
+### 代码重构
+
+* **cli:** 重构外部扩展包读取逻辑，使用专用函数 ([d15054d](https://github.com/Lydanne/spaceflow/commit/d15054d81335a3b0c55db1acd169a2d9edf32a94))
+* **core:** 统一依赖获取函数命名，将 getDependencies 重命名为 getExtensionDependencies ([ff78202](https://github.com/Lydanne/spaceflow/commit/ff78202be9975ce6721e4ecbbd6b1e02f8a57b70))
+
+### 其他修改
+
+* **cli:** released version 0.40.0 [no ci] ([bec5724](https://github.com/Lydanne/spaceflow/commit/bec5724745e8d33a06a00be452ec647bd82be934))
+* **core:** released version 0.26.0 [no ci] ([cc597b0](https://github.com/Lydanne/spaceflow/commit/cc597b000bae00885de32eb2ad4287805de7ce5a))
+* **publish:** released version 0.50.0 [no ci] ([8020040](https://github.com/Lydanne/spaceflow/commit/802004073c276705868ffbef4d5daae6a0068d39))
+* **review-summary:** released version 0.34.0 [no ci] ([3565bc4](https://github.com/Lydanne/spaceflow/commit/3565bc426469fa8215d70fb3bbd2a9ee9c128916))
+* **scripts:** released version 0.27.0 [no ci] ([8c4111a](https://github.com/Lydanne/spaceflow/commit/8c4111a73c472fab084030d547656ba5784e05b2))
+* **shared:** released version 0.8.0 [no ci] ([c3fe353](https://github.com/Lydanne/spaceflow/commit/c3fe3536ba0adca45f610fa2e8697bfccf842efe))
+* **shell:** released version 0.27.0 [no ci] ([c4501c2](https://github.com/Lydanne/spaceflow/commit/c4501c284de780c97a5a1cfc5b413ae8393acb91))
+
 ## [0.66.0](https://github.com/Lydanne/spaceflow/compare/@spaceflow/review@0.65.0...@spaceflow/review@0.66.0) (2026-03-03)
 
 ### 新特性

package/dist/index.js

@@ -2515,7 +2515,7 @@ class ReviewService {
         existingResult.issues = await this.fillIssueAuthors(existingResult.issues, commits, owner, repo, verbose);
         // 3. 同步已解决的评论状态
         await this.syncResolvedComments(owner, repo, prNumber, existingResult);
-        // 4. 同步评论 reactions（👍/👎）
+        // 4. 同步评论 reactions（👍/👎/☹️）
         await this.syncReactionsToIssues(owner, repo, prNumber, existingResult, verbose);
         // 5. LLM 验证历史问题是否已修复
         try {
@@ -3431,7 +3431,7 @@ ${fileChanges || "无"}`;
         }
         // 获取已解决的评论，同步 resolve 状态（在更新 review 之前）
         await this.syncResolvedComments(owner, repo, prNumber, result);
-        // 获取评论的 reactions，同步 valid 状态（👎 标记为无效）
+        // 获取评论的 reactions，同步状态（☹️ 标记无效，👎 标记未解决）
         await this.syncReactionsToIssues(owner, repo, prNumber, result, verbose);
         // 查找已有的 AI 评论（Issue Comment），可能存在多个重复评论
         if (shouldLog(verbose, 2)) {
@@ -3619,7 +3619,8 @@ ${fileChanges || "无"}`;
    * 从旧的 AI review 评论中获取 reactions 和回复，同步到 result.issues
    * - 存储所有 reactions 到 issue.reactions 字段
    * - 存储评论回复到 issue.replies 字段
-   * - 如果评论有 👎 (-1) reaction，将对应的问题标记为无效
+   * - 如果评论有 ☹️ (confused) reaction，将对应的问题标记为无效
+   * - 如果评论有 👎 (-1) reaction，将对应的问题标记为未解决
    */ async syncReactionsToIssues(owner, repo, prNumber, result, verbose) {
         try {
             const reviews = await this.gitProvider.listPullReviews(owner, repo, prNumber);
@@ -3710,12 +3711,22 @@ ${fileChanges || "无"}`;
                             content,
                             users
                         }));
-                    // 检查是否有评审人的 👎 (-1) reaction，标记为无效
+                    // 检查是否有评审人的 ☹️ (confused) reaction，标记为无效
+                    const confusedUsers = reactionMap.get("confused") || [];
+                    const reviewerConfused = confusedUsers.filter((u)=>reviewers.has(u));
+                    if (reviewerConfused.length > 0 && matchedIssue.valid !== "false") {
+                        matchedIssue.valid = "false";
+                        console.log(`☹️ 问题已标记为无效: ${matchedIssue.file}:${matchedIssue.line} (by 评审人: ${reviewerConfused.join(", ")})`);
+                    }
+                    // 检查是否有评审人的 👎 (-1) reaction，标记为未解决
                     const thumbsDownUsers = reactionMap.get("-1") || [];
                     const reviewerThumbsDown = thumbsDownUsers.filter((u)=>reviewers.has(u));
-                    if (reviewerThumbsDown.length > 0 && matchedIssue.valid !== "false") {
-                        matchedIssue.valid = "false";
-                        console.log(`👎 问题已标记为无效: ${matchedIssue.file}:${matchedIssue.line} (by 评审人: ${reviewerThumbsDown.join(", ")})`);
+                    if (reviewerThumbsDown.length > 0 && (matchedIssue.resolved || matchedIssue.fixed)) {
+                        matchedIssue.resolved = undefined;
+                        matchedIssue.resolvedBy = undefined;
+                        matchedIssue.fixed = undefined;
+                        matchedIssue.fixedBy = undefined;
+                        console.log(`👎 问题已标记为未解决: ${matchedIssue.file}:${matchedIssue.line} (by 评审人: ${reviewerThumbsDown.join(", ")})`);
                     }
                 } catch  {
                 // 单个评论获取 reactions 失败，继续处理其他评论

package/package.json

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 {
   "name": "@spaceflow/review",
-  "version": "0.67.0",
+  "version": "0.68.0",
   "description": "Spaceflow 代码审查插件，使用 LLM 对 PR 代码进行自动审查",
   "license": "MIT",
   "author": "Lydanne",

package/src/review.service.ts

@@ -956,7 +956,7 @@ export class ReviewService {
     // 3. 同步已解决的评论状态
     await this.syncResolvedComments(owner, repo, prNumber, existingResult);
 
-    // 4. 同步评论 reactions（👍/👎）
+    // 4. 同步评论 reactions（👍/👎/☹️）
     await this.syncReactionsToIssues(owner, repo, prNumber, existingResult, verbose);
 
     // 5. LLM 验证历史问题是否已修复
@@ -2078,7 +2078,7 @@ ${fileChanges || "无"}`;
     // 获取已解决的评论，同步 resolve 状态（在更新 review 之前）
     await this.syncResolvedComments(owner, repo, prNumber, result);
 
-    // 获取评论的 reactions，同步 valid 状态（👎 标记为无效）
+    // 获取评论的 reactions，同步状态（☹️ 标记无效，👎 标记未解决）
     await this.syncReactionsToIssues(owner, repo, prNumber, result, verbose);
 
     // 查找已有的 AI 评论（Issue Comment），可能存在多个重复评论
@@ -2307,7 +2307,8 @@ ${fileChanges || "无"}`;
    * 从旧的 AI review 评论中获取 reactions 和回复，同步到 result.issues
    * - 存储所有 reactions 到 issue.reactions 字段
    * - 存储评论回复到 issue.replies 字段
-   * - 如果评论有 👎 (-1) reaction，将对应的问题标记为无效
+   * - 如果评论有 ☹️ (confused) reaction，将对应的问题标记为无效
+   * - 如果评论有 👎 (-1) reaction，将对应的问题标记为未解决
    */
   protected async syncReactionsToIssues(
     owner: string,
@@ -2429,13 +2430,25 @@ ${fileChanges || "无"}`;
             content,
             users,
           }));
-          // 检查是否有评审人的 👎 (-1) reaction，标记为无效
+          // 检查是否有评审人的 ☹️ (confused) reaction，标记为无效
+          const confusedUsers = reactionMap.get("confused") || [];
+          const reviewerConfused = confusedUsers.filter((u) => reviewers.has(u));
+          if (reviewerConfused.length > 0 && matchedIssue.valid !== "false") {
+            matchedIssue.valid = "false";
+            console.log(
+              `☹️ 问题已标记为无效: ${matchedIssue.file}:${matchedIssue.line} (by 评审人: ${reviewerConfused.join(", ")})`,
+            );
+          }
+          // 检查是否有评审人的 👎 (-1) reaction，标记为未解决
           const thumbsDownUsers = reactionMap.get("-1") || [];
           const reviewerThumbsDown = thumbsDownUsers.filter((u) => reviewers.has(u));
-          if (reviewerThumbsDown.length > 0 && matchedIssue.valid !== "false") {
-            matchedIssue.valid = "false";
+          if (reviewerThumbsDown.length > 0 && (matchedIssue.resolved || matchedIssue.fixed)) {
+            matchedIssue.resolved = undefined;
+            matchedIssue.resolvedBy = undefined;
+            matchedIssue.fixed = undefined;
+            matchedIssue.fixedBy = undefined;
             console.log(
-              `👎 问题已标记为无效: ${matchedIssue.file}:${matchedIssue.line} (by 评审人: ${reviewerThumbsDown.join(", ")})`,
+              `👎 问题已标记为未解决: ${matchedIssue.file}:${matchedIssue.line} (by 评审人: ${reviewerThumbsDown.join(", ")})`,
             );
           }
         } catch {