@sleepy-ai/cli 0.1.6 → 0.1.8

package/src/workflow/builtin/deep-research.js

@@ -1,398 +0,0 @@
-export const meta = {
-  name: 'deep-research',
-  description: 'Deep research orchestrator — runs parallel web searches, reads the strongest sources, cross-checks each fact with an adversarial jury, and writes a cited report.',
-  whenToUse: 'Use when the user wants a thorough, multi-source, fact-checked answer rather than a quick reply. If the request is broad or ambiguous (missing budget, region, use-case, time frame, etc.), ask one or two narrowing questions first, then fold the answers into the question you pass as args.',
-  phases: [
-    { title: "Plan", detail: "Break the question (from args) into several complementary search lines" },
-    { title: "Search", detail: "One web-search agent per line, in parallel" },
-    { title: "Extract", detail: "De-duplicate URLs, read the top sources, pull out checkable facts" },
-    { title: "Group", detail: "Fold facts that assert the same thing into one so each is checked once" },
-    { title: "Crosscheck", detail: "Adversarial jury per fact — a majority of reject votes drops it" },
-    { title: "Report", detail: "Rank survivors by certainty, merge, and cite" },
-  ],
-}
-
-// Tunables.
-const JURY_SIZE = 3        // crosscheck voters per fact
-const REJECT_QUORUM = 2    // reject votes that kill a fact AND the min valid votes needed to keep one
-const SOURCE_BUDGET = 15   // hard cap on how many URLs we actually read
-const FACT_CAP = 25        // hard cap on facts that reach crosscheck
-
-// ─── Structured-output shapes ───
-const PLAN_SHAPE = {
-  type: "object", required: ["question", "lines"],
-  properties: {
-    question: { type: "string" },
-    strategy: { type: "string" },
-    lines: { type: "array", minItems: 3, maxItems: 6, items: {
-      type: "object", required: ["topic", "query"],
-      properties: {
-        topic: { type: "string" },
-        query: { type: "string" },
-        why: { type: "string" },
-      },
-    }},
-  },
-}
-const HITS_SHAPE = {
-  type: "object", required: ["hits"],
-  properties: {
-    hits: { type: "array", maxItems: 6, items: {
-      type: "object", required: ["url", "title", "fit"],
-      properties: {
-        url: { type: "string" },
-        title: { type: "string" },
-        note: { type: "string" },
-        fit: { enum: ["high", "medium", "low"] },
-      },
-    }},
-  },
-}
-const READ_SHAPE = {
-  type: "object", required: ["facts", "tier"],
-  properties: {
-    tier: { enum: ["primary", "secondary", "blog", "forum", "weak"] },
-    published: { type: "string" },
-    facts: { type: "array", maxItems: 5, items: {
-      type: "object", required: ["statement", "excerpt", "weight"],
-      properties: {
-        statement: { type: "string" },
-        excerpt: { type: "string" },
-        weight: { enum: ["key", "support", "aside"] },
-      },
-    }},
-  },
-}
-const RULING_SHAPE = {
-  type: "object", required: ["reject", "reason", "certainty"],
-  properties: {
-    reject: { type: "boolean" },
-    reason: { type: "string" },
-    certainty: { enum: ["high", "medium", "low"] },
-    counter: { type: "string" },
-  },
-}
-const GROUP_SHAPE = {
-  type: "object", required: ["groups"],
-  properties: {
-    groups: { type: "array", items: {
-      type: "object", required: ["canonical", "members"],
-      properties: {
-        canonical: { type: "string" },
-        members: { type: "array", items: { type: "number" } },
-        urls: { type: "array", items: { type: "string" } },
-      },
-    }},
-  },
-}
-const REPORT_SHAPE = {
-  type: "object", required: ["answer", "findings", "limits"],
-  properties: {
-    answer: { type: "string" },
-    findings: { type: "array", items: {
-      type: "object", required: ["point", "certainty", "sources", "basis"],
-      properties: {
-        point: { type: "string" },
-        certainty: { enum: ["high", "medium", "low"] },
-        sources: { type: "array", items: { type: "string" } },
-        basis: { type: "string" },
-        tally: { type: "string" },
-      },
-    }},
-    limits: { type: "string" },
-    followups: { type: "array", items: { type: "string" } },
-  },
-}
-
-// ─── Plan: split the question into search lines ───
-phase("Plan")
-const TOPIC = (typeof args === "string" && args.trim()) || ""
-if (!TOPIC) {
-  return { error: "No research question provided. Pass the question as args." }
-}
-const plan = await agent(
-  "You are planning a research sweep. Turn the question below into complementary web searches.\n\n" +
-  "## Question\n" + TOPIC + "\n\n" +
-  "## What to produce\n" +
-  "Five web-search queries that, together, approach the question from different directions. Choose directions that fit the subject. A few patterns to draw on:\n" +
-  "- general overview · technical/academic depth · latest developments · skeptical/opposing takes · hands-on/practitioner notes\n" +
-  "- a clinical question might split into: mechanism · frequent causes · dangerous look-alikes · guideline sources · warning signs\n" +
-  "- a software question might split into: current best practice · measured benchmarks · known limits · who actually ships it · cost & trade-offs\n\n" +
-  "Keep each query tight enough to surface high-signal pages. Don't let two queries overlap.\n" +
-  "Return the question (as given or lightly cleaned up), a one-line plan, and the search lines.\n\nReturn structured output only.",
-  { label: "plan", schema: PLAN_SHAPE }
-)
-if (!plan) {
-  return { error: "Planning step produced nothing — cannot split the question into searches." }
-}
-log("Q: " + TOPIC.slice(0, 80) + (TOPIC.length > 80 ? "…" : ""))
-log("Split into " + plan.lines.length + " lines: " + plan.lines.map(l => l.topic).join(", "))
-
-// ─── URL bookkeeping, shared as searchers report in ───
-const canonURL = u => {
-  try {
-    const parsed = new URL(u)
-    return (parsed.hostname.replace(/^www\./, "") + parsed.pathname.replace(/\/$/, "")).toLowerCase()
-  } catch { return u.toLowerCase() }
-}
-const taken = new Map()
-const repeats = []
-const overflow = []
-const FIT_RANK = { high: 0, medium: 1, low: 2 }
-let slotsLeft = SOURCE_BUDGET
-
-// ─── Agent prompts ───
-const searchPrompt = (line) =>
-  "You are one of several researchers, each chasing a different line of inquiry.\n\n" +
-  "Overall question: \"" + TOPIC + "\"\n\n" +
-  "Your line: **" + line.topic + "**" + (line.why ? " — " + line.why : "") + "\n" +
-  "Suggested query: `" + line.query + "`\n\n" +
-  "Run WebSearch (refine the query if you can do better) and hand back the 4-6 most useful results.\n" +
-  "Judge usefulness against the OVERALL question, not just your query. Drop content farms and SEO spam.\n" +
-  "Give each result a one-line note on why it matters.\n\nReturn structured output only."
-
-const readPrompt = (source, line) =>
-  "Read one source and pull out checkable facts.\n\n" +
-  "Overall question: \"" + TOPIC + "\"\n\n" +
-  "**URL:** " + source.url + "\n**Title:** " + source.title + "\n**Surfaced by:** the \"" + line + "\" line\n\n" +
-  "## Steps\n1. Fetch the page with WebFetch.\n" +
-  "2. Judge the source tier: primary (research / the institution itself), secondary (reporting), blog/opinion, forum, or weak/unreliable.\n" +
-  "3. Pull 2-5 FALSIFIABLE facts that bear on the question. Each fact must:\n" +
-  "   - state something concrete and checkable (no vague hand-waving)\n" +
-  "   - quote the source verbatim as backing\n" +
-  "   - be tagged key / support / aside relative to the question\n" +
-  "4. Record the publish date if you can find it.\n\n" +
-  "If the page won't load, is paywalled, or is off-topic, return facts: [] with tier: \"weak\".\n\nReturn structured output only."
-
-const groupPrompt = (facts) =>
-  "Fold together the facts below that assert the SAME thing, so each assertion gets checked only once.\n\n" +
-  "Overall question: \"" + TOPIC + "\"\n\n" +
-  "Merge only facts that make the same claim (even if worded differently or from different sources). " +
-  "If you're unsure, leave them apart — collapsing two distinct facts can let a shaky one ride on a solid one's coattails.\n\n" +
-  "## Facts (index: statement — source)\n" +
-  facts.map((f, i) => i + ": " + f.statement + " — " + f.sourceUrl + " (" + f.tier + ")").join("\n") + "\n\n" +
-  "Per group, return a single canonical wording, the member indices, and the combined source URLs.\n\nReturn structured output only."
-
-const crosscheckPrompt = (fact, n) =>
-  "You are juror " + (n + 1) + " of " + JURY_SIZE + ", and your job is to try to KNOCK THIS DOWN.\n\n" +
-  "Stay skeptical. " + REJECT_QUORUM + " of " + JURY_SIZE + " jurors voting reject will drop the fact.\n\n" +
-  "## Question in scope\n" + TOPIC + "\n\n" +
-  "## Fact on trial\n\"" + fact.statement + "\"\n\n" +
-  "**Source:** " + fact.sourceUrl + " (" + fact.tier + ")\n" +
-  "**Backing quote:** \"" + fact.excerpt + "\"\n\n" +
-  "## Run through these\n" +
-  "1. Does the quote actually back the fact, or is the fact reaching beyond it?\n" +
-  "2. Search for contradicting evidence — does any trustworthy source disagree or add big caveats?\n" +
-  "3. Is the source strong enough for how bold the fact is? (big claims need primary sources)\n" +
-  "4. Has it gone stale? (check dates — old facts in fast-moving areas are suspect)\n" +
-  "5. Is it really marketing copy, a press release, a cherry-picked number, or forum chatter?\n\n" +
-  "Vote **reject=true** when: the quote doesn't support it / something contradicts it / the source is too weak for the claim / it's outdated / it's spin.\n" +
-  "Vote **reject=false** only when the fact is well-backed, current, and the source matches its boldness.\n" +
-  "When genuinely unsure, reject. Your reason MUST be concrete.\n\nReturn structured output only."
-
-// ─── Search → de-dup → read, streamed (no barrier between stages) ───
-const perLine = await pipeline(
-  plan.lines,
-
-  line => agent(searchPrompt(line), {
-    label: "search:" + line.topic, phase: "Search", schema: HITS_SHAPE
-  }).then(r => {
-    if (!r) return null
-    log(line.topic + ": " + r.hits.length + " hits")
-    return { line: line.topic, hits: r.hits }
-  }),
-
-  found => {
-    // Stage 1 returns null when the search agent failed (over-cap, schema
-    // reject, no-deliverable, etc.). pipeline() pipes that null straight here,
-    // so guard before touching .hits — otherwise a single search miss crashes
-    // the whole run with `cannot read property 'hits' of null` at line 207.
-    // Returning null here drops this line's slot; perLine.flat().filter(Boolean)
-    // at line 251 already prunes nulls when collecting `sources`.
-    if (!found) return null
-    const byFit = [...found.hits].sort((a, b) => FIT_RANK[a.fit] - FIT_RANK[b.fit])
-    const fresh = byFit.filter(h => {
-      const key = canonURL(h.url)
-      if (taken.has(key)) {
-        repeats.push({ ...h, line: found.line, sameAs: taken.get(key) })
-        return false
-      }
-      // Once the read budget is gone, only still-admit top-fit pages.
-      if (slotsLeft <= 0 && FIT_RANK[h.fit] >= 1) {
-        overflow.push({ ...h, line: found.line })
-        return false
-      }
-      taken.set(key, { line: found.line, title: h.title })
-      slotsLeft--
-      return true
-    })
-    if (fresh.length < found.hits.length) {
-      log(found.line + ": " + fresh.length + " fresh (" + (found.hits.length - fresh.length) + " dropped)")
-    }
-    return parallel(
-      fresh.map(source => () => {
-        let host = "unknown"
-        try { host = new URL(source.url).hostname.replace(/^www\./, "") } catch {}
-        return agent(readPrompt(source, found.line), {
-          label: "read:" + host,
-          phase: "Extract",
-          schema: READ_SHAPE,
-        }).then(out => {
-          // A skipped agent returns null — drop the entry (the flat().filter(Boolean)
-          // below clears it) instead of routing it through .catch and falsely tagging it weak.
-          if (!out) return null
-          return {
-            url: source.url, title: source.title, line: found.line,
-            tier: out.tier, published: out.published,
-            facts: out.facts.map(f => ({ ...f, sourceUrl: source.url, tier: out.tier })),
-          }
-        }).catch(e => {
-          log("read failed: " + source.url + " — " + (e.message || e))
-          return { url: source.url, title: source.title, line: found.line, tier: "weak", facts: [] }
-        })
-      })
-    )
-  }
-)
-
-const sources = perLine.flat().filter(Boolean)
-const facts = sources.flatMap(s => s.facts)
-const WEIGHT_RANK = { key: 0, support: 1, aside: 2 }
-const TIER_RANK = { primary: 0, secondary: 1, blog: 2, forum: 3, weak: 4 }
-
-const topFacts = [...facts]
-  .sort((a, b) => (WEIGHT_RANK[a.weight] - WEIGHT_RANK[b.weight]) || (TIER_RANK[a.tier] - TIER_RANK[b.tier]))
-  .slice(0, FACT_CAP)
-
-log("Read " + sources.length + " sources → " + facts.length + " facts → checking top " + topFacts.length)
-
-if (topFacts.length === 0) {
-  return {
-    question: TOPIC,
-    answer: "No facts could be extracted. " + sources.length + " sources read, all empty or failed. " + repeats.length + " repeat URLs, " + overflow.length + " past the read budget.",
-    findings: [], rejected: [], sources: sources.map(s => ({ url: s.url, tier: s.tier })),
-    stats: { lines: plan.lines.length, sources: sources.length, facts: 0, repeats: repeats.length },
-  }
-}
-
-// ─── Group identical facts so each is checked once ───
-phase("Group")
-const grouped = await agent(groupPrompt(topFacts), { label: "group", phase: "Group", schema: GROUP_SHAPE })
-const groups = grouped && grouped.groups && grouped.groups.length
-  ? grouped.groups.map(g => {
-      const idx = (g.members || []).filter(i => i >= 0 && i < topFacts.length)
-      const head = topFacts[idx[0] != null ? idx[0] : 0]
-      const urls = [...new Set((g.urls && g.urls.length ? g.urls : idx.map(i => topFacts[i].sourceUrl)))]
-      return { ...head, statement: g.canonical || head.statement, urls }
-    })
-  : topFacts.map(f => ({ ...f, urls: [f.sourceUrl] }))
-log("Folded " + topFacts.length + " facts → " + groups.length + " groups")
-
-// ─── Crosscheck: adversarial jury per group ───
-// Barrier on purpose — the full fact set must be gathered and ranked before any voting.
-phase("Crosscheck")
-const judged = (await parallel(
-  groups.map(fact => () =>
-    parallel(
-      Array.from({ length: JURY_SIZE }, (_, n) => () =>
-        agent(crosscheckPrompt(fact, n), {
-          label: "j" + n + ":" + fact.statement.slice(0, 40),
-          phase: "Crosscheck",
-          schema: RULING_SHAPE,
-          model: "lite",
-        })
-      )
-    ).then(rulings => {
-      // A null ruling (skip or agent error) counts as an abstention.
-      const cast = rulings.filter(Boolean)
-      const rejects = cast.filter(v => v.reject).length
-      // A fact is kept only if it was genuinely adjudicated: a quorum of real
-      // votes AND fewer than REJECT_QUORUM of them rejecting. Too many
-      // abstentions means "unproven", which must not slip through as kept
-      // (otherwise all-abstain → rejects=0 → false keep).
-      const abstain = JURY_SIZE - cast.length
-      const kept = cast.length >= REJECT_QUORUM && rejects < REJECT_QUORUM
-      log("\"" + fact.statement.slice(0, 50) + "…\": " + (cast.length - rejects) + "-" + rejects + (abstain > 0 ? " (" + abstain + " abstain)" : "") + " " + (kept ? "✓" : "✗"))
-      return { ...fact, rulings: cast, rejectCount: rejects, kept }
-    })
-  )
-)).filter(Boolean)
-
-const upheld = judged.filter(f => f.kept)
-const dropped = judged.filter(f => !f.kept)
-log("Crosscheck done: " + judged.length + " facts → " + upheld.length + " upheld, " + dropped.length + " dropped")
-
-if (upheld.length === 0) {
-  return {
-    question: TOPIC,
-    answer: "Every one of the " + judged.length + " facts was rejected on crosscheck. Inconclusive — sources were likely weak or the claims overstated.",
-    findings: [],
-    rejected: dropped.map(f => ({ statement: f.statement, tally: (f.rulings.length - f.rejectCount) + "-" + f.rejectCount, source: f.sourceUrl })),
-    sources: sources.map(s => ({ url: s.url, tier: s.tier, factCount: s.facts.length })),
-    stats: { lines: plan.lines.length, sources: sources.length, facts: facts.length, checked: judged.length, upheld: 0, dropped: dropped.length },
-  }
-}
-
-// ─── Report ───
-phase("Report")
-const CERTAINTY_RANK = { high: 0, medium: 1, low: 2 }
-const digest = upheld.map((f, i) => {
-  const top = f.rulings.filter(v => !v.reject).sort((a, b) => CERTAINTY_RANK[a.certainty] - CERTAINTY_RANK[b.certainty])[0]
-  const cites = (f.urls && f.urls.length ? f.urls : [f.sourceUrl]).join(", ")
-  return "### [" + i + "] " + f.statement + "\n" +
-    "Tally: " + (f.rulings.length - f.rejectCount) + "-" + f.rejectCount + " · Sources: " + cites + " (" + f.tier + ")\n" +
-    "Quote: \"" + f.excerpt + "\"\nJuror basis (" + top.certainty + "): " + top.reason + "\n"
-}).join("\n")
-
-const droppedDigest = dropped.length > 0
-  ? "\n## Rejected on crosscheck (shown for transparency)\n" +
-    dropped.map(f => "- \"" + f.statement + "\" (" + f.sourceUrl + ", tally " + (f.rulings.length - f.rejectCount) + "-" + f.rejectCount + ")").join("\n")
-  : ""
-
-const report = await agent(
-  "## Write the research report\n\n" +
-  "**Question:** " + TOPIC + "\n\n" +
-  upheld.length + " facts came through a " + JURY_SIZE + "-juror crosscheck. Fold any remaining duplicates and write this up.\n\n" +
-  "## Facts that held up\n" + digest + "\n" + droppedDigest + "\n\n" +
-  "## How to write it\n" +
-  "1. Merge facts that say the same thing and pool their sources.\n" +
-  "2. Gather related facts into coherent findings, each one speaking to the question.\n" +
-  "3. Rate each finding's certainty: high (several primary sources, jury unanimous), medium (secondary sources or a split jury), low (single source or blog-grade).\n" +
-  "4. Open with a 3-5 sentence answer to the question.\n" +
-  "5. Spell out the limits: what's shaky, which sources were thin, what may have gone stale.\n" +
-  "6. End with 2-4 questions that surfaced but went unanswered.\n\nReturn structured output only.",
-  { label: "report", schema: REPORT_SHAPE }
-)
-
-if (!report) {
-  // Report agent skipped or failed — hand back the upheld facts raw rather than
-  // throwing on report.findings and losing the whole run.
-  return {
-    question: TOPIC,
-    answer: "Report step was skipped or failed — returning " + upheld.length + " checked facts unmerged.",
-    findings: [],
-    upheld: upheld.map(f => ({ statement: f.statement, source: f.sourceUrl, quote: f.excerpt, tally: (f.rulings.length - f.rejectCount) + "-" + f.rejectCount })),
-    rejected: dropped.map(f => ({ statement: f.statement, tally: (f.rulings.length - f.rejectCount) + "-" + f.rejectCount, source: f.sourceUrl })),
-    sources: sources.map(s => ({ url: s.url, tier: s.tier, factCount: s.facts.length })),
-    stats: { lines: plan.lines.length, sources: sources.length, facts: facts.length, checked: judged.length, upheld: upheld.length, dropped: dropped.length, afterReport: 0 },
-  }
-}
-
-return {
-  question: TOPIC,
-  ...report,
-  rejected: dropped.map(f => ({ statement: f.statement, tally: (f.rulings.length - f.rejectCount) + "-" + f.rejectCount, source: f.sourceUrl })),
-  sources: sources.map(s => ({ url: s.url, tier: s.tier, line: s.line, factCount: s.facts.length })),
-  stats: {
-    lines: plan.lines.length,
-    sourcesRead: sources.length,
-    factsFound: facts.length,
-    factsChecked: judged.length,
-    upheld: upheld.length,
-    dropped: dropped.length,
-    afterReport: report.findings.length,
-    repeatUrls: repeats.length,
-    overBudget: overflow.length,
-    agentRuns: 1 + plan.lines.length + sources.length + 1 + (judged.length * JURY_SIZE) + 1,
-  },
-}

package/src/workflow/builtin.ts

@@ -1,59 +0,0 @@
-export * as BuiltinWorkflow from "./builtin"
-
-// `with { type: "text" }` makes Bun inline the .js file's SOURCE as a string
-// (not import it as a module) and embeds it into the compiled binary via
-// `bun build --compile` (mirrors the `with { type: "file" }` asset pattern in
-// script/build.ts) — so the built-in script ships with the binary. The Bun
-// runtime and bundler both honour this, but tsgo resolves the .js as a real
-// module and flags TS1192 ("no default export"); the suppression is scoped to
-// this single import. A `Bun.file(...).text()` fallback is intentionally NOT
-// used: it reads the real filesystem at runtime, which does not exist inside a
-// compiled standalone binary.
-// @ts-expect-error TS1192: import-attribute text loader, resolved by Bun not tsgo
-import DEEP_RESEARCH_SCRIPT from "./builtin/deep-research.js" with { type: "text" }
-// @ts-expect-error TS1192: import-attribute text loader, resolved by Bun not tsgo
-import COMPOSE_SCRIPT from "./builtin/compose.js" with { type: "text" }
-import { parseMeta } from "./meta"
-
-export type Entry = {
-  name: string
-  description: string
-  whenToUse?: string
-  phases?: { title: string; detail?: string }[]
-  script: string
-}
-
-// Built-in workflow scripts shipped with the binary. Each is parsed ONCE at
-// module load (meta is static data, not executed). Add new built-ins here.
-// `file` is carried so a malformed meta names the offending script — this throw
-// runs at module init, so a broken built-in fails the whole app boot; the path
-// tells the user which one.
-const SCRIPTS: { file: string; script: string }[] = [
-  { file: "deep-research.js", script: DEEP_RESEARCH_SCRIPT },
-  { file: "compose.js", script: COMPOSE_SCRIPT },
-]
-
-// Null-prototype so the registry is a self-evidently closed set: a lookup like
-// get("constructor")/get("toString") returns undefined, not an inherited
-// Object.prototype member.
-const REGISTRY: Record<string, Entry> = Object.create(null)
-for (const { file, script } of SCRIPTS) {
-  const parsed = parseMeta(script)
-  if (!parsed.ok) throw new Error(`built-in workflow ${file} failed to parse meta: ${parsed.error}`)
-  const meta = parsed.meta
-  REGISTRY[meta.name] = {
-    name: meta.name,
-    description: meta.description,
-    whenToUse: meta.whenToUse,
-    phases: meta.phases,
-    script,
-  }
-}
-
-export function list(): Entry[] {
-  return Object.values(REGISTRY).sort((a, b) => a.name.localeCompare(b.name))
-}
-
-export function get(name: string): Entry | undefined {
-  return REGISTRY[name]
-}

package/src/workflow/events.ts

@@ -1,72 +0,0 @@
-import { BusEvent } from "@/bus/bus-event"
-import { SessionID } from "@/session/schema"
-import z from "zod"
-
-export const WorkflowPhase = BusEvent.define(
-  "workflow.phase",
-  z.object({ sessionID: SessionID.zod, runID: z.string(), title: z.string() }),
-)
-
-export const WorkflowLog = BusEvent.define(
-  "workflow.log",
-  z.object({ sessionID: SessionID.zod, runID: z.string(), message: z.string() }),
-)
-
-export const WorkflowStarted = BusEvent.define(
-  "workflow.started",
-  z.object({ sessionID: SessionID.zod, runID: z.string(), name: z.string() }),
-)
-
-export const WorkflowFinished = BusEvent.define(
-  "workflow.finished",
-  z.object({
-    sessionID: SessionID.zod,
-    runID: z.string(),
-    status: z.enum(["completed", "failed", "cancelled"]),
-    error: z.string().optional(),
-  }),
-)
-
-// agent() collapses every failure path to bare null (over-cap, spawn-reject,
-// timeout, actor-error, no-deliverable). The script can detect failure but not
-// WHY — operators end up grep-mining 25GB of bus chatter to triage. This event
-// emits the reason without changing agent()'s null return contract: existing
-// scripts work unchanged; new consumers (drivers, /workflows view, tests) can
-// subscribe to count failures by reason. Backward-compatible / additive only.
-export const WorkflowAgentFailed = BusEvent.define(
-  "workflow.agent_failed",
-  z.object({
-    sessionID: SessionID.zod,
-    runID: z.string(),
-    /** The child actor's id; absent when no spawn happened (over-cap path). */
-    actorID: z.string().optional(),
-    /** AgentOpts.agentType (defaulted to "general" by the spawn code). */
-    agentType: z.string(),
-    /** AgentOpts.label, observability tag (e.g. "port:bun_sys/fd.rs"). */
-    label: z.string().optional(),
-    /** Phase title at failure time, either AgentOpts.phase or run.currentPhase. */
-    phase: z.string().optional(),
-    reason: z.enum(["over-cap", "spawn-reject", "timeout", "actor-error", "no-deliverable"]),
-    /** For actor-error: the outcome.error message if available. */
-    errorMessage: z.string().optional(),
-  }),
-)
-
-// A child workflow run (started via the guest workflow() primitive) reached a
-// non-success terminal for a RUNTIME reason (its agents failed, deadline, or it
-// was cancelled). workflow() still resolves to null (never-throw, like agent()),
-// so the orchestrator script continues; this event carries the child runID +
-// status so operators can triage without grep-mining bus chatter. Structural
-// faults (cycle/depth/unknown-name) do NOT emit this — they propagate loud and
-// fail the parent run instead. Additive / backward-compatible, mirrors WorkflowAgentFailed.
-export const WorkflowChildFailed = BusEvent.define(
-  "workflow.child_failed",
-  z.object({
-    sessionID: SessionID.zod,
-    runID: z.string(), // the PARENT (orchestrator) run
-    childRunID: z.string(),
-    name: z.string(), // the child workflow name, or "inline"
-    status: z.enum(["failed", "cancelled"]),
-    error: z.string().optional(),
-  }),
-)