@sjawhar/opencode-legion-envoy 9.5.0 → 9.5.1

This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
package/package.json CHANGED
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
1
1
  {
2
2
  "name": "@sjawhar/opencode-legion-envoy",
3
- "version": "9.5.0",
3
+ "version": "9.5.1",
4
4
  "license": "Apache-2.0",
5
5
  "type": "module",
6
6
  "main": "dist/src/server.js",
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
1
1
  ---
2
2
  name: dispatch-writing-specs
3
- description: "Use in a session with Dispatch before you write or change a spec, and before an ask, comment or message a person reads. It replaces superpowers' brainstorming there. A Legion architect also follows skill://legion-architect."
3
+ description: "Use in a session with Dispatch before you write or change a spec, and before an ask, comment or message a person reads. It replaces superpowers' brainstorming there."
4
4
  ---
5
5
 
6
6
  # Writing specs
@@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ Reach shared understanding with the person at the least cost of their time. A Le
11
11
 
12
12
  ## The outline
13
13
 
14
- The spec is the issue's primary document. Find its project with `dispatch projects` or `dispatch search`, never the environment. Its `##` parts, in order:
14
+ Find the issue's project with `dispatch projects` or `dispatch search`, never the environment. The spec's `##` parts, in order:
15
15
 
16
16
  Part | Content
17
17
  --- | ---
@@ -23,7 +23,7 @@ Part | Content
23
23
  `Decisions` | Your own choices
24
24
  `Acceptance` | `**A1.**` on, each naming the requirements it tests
25
25
 
26
- Another agent can build and check the work from the spec alone. Length scales with the change: a small change gets a few sentences per part, no matrix. Split a large design into child issues.
26
+ Another agent can build and check the work from the spec alone. A small change gets a few sentences per part, no matrix. Split a large design into child issues.
27
27
 
28
28
  ## Rules for the text
29
29
 
@@ -32,10 +32,12 @@ For each spec, ask, comment and message:
32
32
  - Write in `skill://asd-ste100`'s strict mode.
33
33
  - State the current design, never how people reached it.
34
34
  - Link each source where the person wrote it: `dispatch://KEY/comment/<id>`, `/ask/<id>`, `/message/<id>`, or a Slack URL. With no link, state the design.
35
+ - In a spec, cite code by file and symbol, never a line number: it goes stale at the next edit.
36
+ - A sentence that cites a gate passing (a test, review, check or proof) also says, in that sentence, what the pass does not show: "The tests pass; they catch a wrong verdict, not a proof of a contradiction."
35
37
  - Write about the design, never the person. Never quote people or upload their words.
36
38
  - Name your session only if a reader must reach it.
37
39
  - Keep only text that helps a reader understand, decide, build, check.
38
- - Explain each name or term a new reader may not know. Name an issue by its `dispatch://` link, and say in a clause what it does for this reader.
40
+ - Explain each name or term a new reader may not know. Say in a clause what each issue you name does for this reader.
39
41
  - In an ask, ask block, comment or message, name a requirement or check by what it is, never its number.
40
42
 
41
43
  ## Questions
@@ -48,9 +50,9 @@ For each spec, ask, comment and message:
48
50
 
49
51
  ## Each version
50
52
 
51
- 1. After a person's answer, comment or edit, rewrite what it touches; delete what it contradicts. Write what is true now. Never narrate an edit or what used to be here; versions and comments hold the history. Reply in a comment's thread; resolve the ask it answers.
53
+ 1. After a person's answer, comment or edit, rewrite what it touches; delete what it contradicts. Never narrate an edit or what used to be here; versions and comments hold the history. Reply in a comment's thread.
52
54
  2. Before each spec write, paste the whole spec, never a path, into a fresh subagent's assignment. It lists gaps, conflicts, uncheckable requirements, unclear text, and missing or needless questions. Fix or record each.
53
- 3. Before each approval request, a read-only agent checks its facts: `task(agent="scout")`, or `plan-gap-analyst` and `plan-reviewer` in Legion.
55
+ 3. Before each approval request, a read-only agent checks its facts: `task(agent="scout")`.
54
56
  4. Name each version with `dispatch doc-edit --summary`.
55
57
 
56
58
  ## Decisions
@@ -67,9 +69,7 @@ At your next edit, rewrite a spec outside the outline whole, in one version. Mov
67
69
  ## Approval
68
70
 
69
71
  - Request approval once, when each ask block is answered or waived, each claim is checked, and this version is unapproved. Unbuilt acceptance checks never delay it.
70
- - When their answer is the whole change since approval, Dispatch carries it.
71
72
  - After approval, version only a change to scope, acceptance, cost, risk or a person's decision, all at once. Put other fixes in the plan or a comment.
72
- - A Legion root spec's design gate follows `skill://legion-architect`.
73
73
 
74
74
  ## The plan
75
75
 
@@ -51,12 +51,13 @@ When the gate is armed, run this exact sequence before the tree's work starts:
51
51
  them to answer: give such a point its own decision block first, or take it out of the spec.
52
52
 
53
53
  ```bash
54
- dispatch request-approval --issue <root issue> --summary '<what the human is approving> Reviews: <gap result>, <claim result>.'
54
+ dispatch request-approval --issue <root issue> --summary '<what the human is approving> Reviews: <gap result>, <claim result>; <what they do not show>.'
55
55
  ```
56
56
 
57
57
  `--summary` says in one to three sentences what the human is approving and nothing else (no
58
- commentary and no open question), then one sentence with both reviews' results, for example
59
- `Reviews: no open gap, 14 of 14 claims verified.` The primary document is the default; the
58
+ commentary and no open question), then one sentence with both reviews' results and what they do
59
+ not show, for example `Reviews: no open gap, 14 of 14 claims verified; neither shows that the
60
+ design works once built.` The primary document is the default; the
60
61
  command prints `Approval requested for spec.md (document id <UUID>) at version <N> (ask <id>)`.
61
62
  5. Register that document version with the daemon:
62
63