@simplysm/claude 13.0.26 → 13.0.27

This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
@@ -0,0 +1,58 @@
1
+ #!/bin/bash
2
+ # Bisection script for finding which test creates unwanted files/directories
3
+ # Usage: ./find-polluter.sh <file_or_dir_to_check> <test_pattern>
4
+ # Example: ./find-polluter.sh '.git' 'src/**/*.test.ts'
5
+
6
+ set -e
7
+
8
+ if [ "$#" -ne 2 ]; then
9
+ echo "Usage: $0 <file_or_dir_to_check> <test_pattern>"
10
+ echo "Example: $0 '.git' 'src/**/*.test.ts'"
11
+ exit 1
12
+ fi
13
+
14
+ CHECK_PATH="$1"
15
+ TEST_PATTERN="$2"
16
+
17
+ # Find all test files matching pattern
18
+ readarray -t TEST_FILES < <(find . -path "$TEST_PATTERN" -type f)
19
+
20
+ if [ ${#TEST_FILES[@]} -eq 0 ]; then
21
+ echo "No test files found matching pattern: $TEST_PATTERN"
22
+ exit 1
23
+ fi
24
+
25
+ echo "Found ${#TEST_FILES[@]} test files"
26
+ echo "Checking for pollution: $CHECK_PATH"
27
+ echo ""
28
+
29
+ for test_file in "${TEST_FILES[@]}"; do
30
+ # Skip if pollution already exists
31
+ if [ -e "$CHECK_PATH" ]; then
32
+ echo "⚠️ Pollution already exists, skipping to avoid false positive"
33
+ echo " Please remove $CHECK_PATH and re-run"
34
+ exit 1
35
+ fi
36
+
37
+ echo "Testing: $test_file"
38
+
39
+ # Run the test
40
+ npm test "$test_file" > /dev/null 2>&1 || true
41
+
42
+ # Check if pollution appeared
43
+ if [ -e "$CHECK_PATH" ]; then
44
+ echo ""
45
+ echo "🔴 FOUND POLLUTER: $test_file"
46
+ echo ""
47
+ echo "This test created: $CHECK_PATH"
48
+ ls -la "$CHECK_PATH" 2>/dev/null || echo "(path exists but can't stat)"
49
+ echo ""
50
+ echo "Investigate with:"
51
+ echo " npm test '$test_file' -- --reporter=verbose"
52
+ echo " git diff"
53
+ exit 0
54
+ fi
55
+ done
56
+
57
+ echo ""
58
+ echo "✅ No polluter found - all ${#TEST_FILES[@]} tests are clean"
@@ -0,0 +1,169 @@
1
+ # Root Cause Tracing
2
+
3
+ ## Overview
4
+
5
+ Bugs often manifest deep in the call stack (git init in wrong directory, file created in wrong location, database opened with wrong path). Your instinct is to fix where the error appears, but that's treating a symptom.
6
+
7
+ **Core principle:** Trace backward through the call chain until you find the original trigger, then fix at the source.
8
+
9
+ ## When to Use
10
+
11
+ ```dot
12
+ digraph when_to_use {
13
+ "Bug appears deep in stack?" [shape=diamond];
14
+ "Can trace backwards?" [shape=diamond];
15
+ "Fix at symptom point" [shape=box];
16
+ "Trace to original trigger" [shape=box];
17
+ "BETTER: Also add defense-in-depth" [shape=box];
18
+
19
+ "Bug appears deep in stack?" -> "Can trace backwards?" [label="yes"];
20
+ "Can trace backwards?" -> "Trace to original trigger" [label="yes"];
21
+ "Can trace backwards?" -> "Fix at symptom point" [label="no - dead end"];
22
+ "Trace to original trigger" -> "BETTER: Also add defense-in-depth";
23
+ }
24
+ ```
25
+
26
+ **Use when:**
27
+ - Error happens deep in execution (not at entry point)
28
+ - Stack trace shows long call chain
29
+ - Unclear where invalid data originated
30
+ - Need to find which test/code triggers the problem
31
+
32
+ ## The Tracing Process
33
+
34
+ ### 1. Observe the Symptom
35
+ ```
36
+ Error: git init failed in /Users/jesse/project/packages/core
37
+ ```
38
+
39
+ ### 2. Find Immediate Cause
40
+ **What code directly causes this?**
41
+ ```typescript
42
+ await execFileAsync('git', ['init'], { cwd: projectDir });
43
+ ```
44
+
45
+ ### 3. Ask: What Called This?
46
+ ```typescript
47
+ WorktreeManager.createSessionWorktree(projectDir, sessionId)
48
+ → called by Session.initializeWorkspace()
49
+ → called by Session.create()
50
+ → called by test at Project.create()
51
+ ```
52
+
53
+ ### 4. Keep Tracing Up
54
+ **What value was passed?**
55
+ - `projectDir = ''` (empty string!)
56
+ - Empty string as `cwd` resolves to `process.cwd()`
57
+ - That's the source code directory!
58
+
59
+ ### 5. Find Original Trigger
60
+ **Where did empty string come from?**
61
+ ```typescript
62
+ const context = setupCoreTest(); // Returns { tempDir: '' }
63
+ Project.create('name', context.tempDir); // Accessed before beforeEach!
64
+ ```
65
+
66
+ ## Adding Stack Traces
67
+
68
+ When you can't trace manually, add instrumentation:
69
+
70
+ ```typescript
71
+ // Before the problematic operation
72
+ async function gitInit(directory: string) {
73
+ const stack = new Error().stack;
74
+ console.error('DEBUG git init:', {
75
+ directory,
76
+ cwd: process.cwd(),
77
+ nodeEnv: process.env.NODE_ENV,
78
+ stack,
79
+ });
80
+
81
+ await execFileAsync('git', ['init'], { cwd: directory });
82
+ }
83
+ ```
84
+
85
+ **Critical:** Use `console.error()` in tests (not logger - may not show)
86
+
87
+ **Run and capture:**
88
+ ```bash
89
+ npm test 2>&1 | grep 'DEBUG git init'
90
+ ```
91
+
92
+ **Analyze stack traces:**
93
+ - Look for test file names
94
+ - Find the line number triggering the call
95
+ - Identify the pattern (same test? same parameter?)
96
+
97
+ ## Finding Which Test Causes Pollution
98
+
99
+ If something appears during tests but you don't know which test:
100
+
101
+ Use the bisection script `find-polluter.sh` in this directory:
102
+
103
+ ```bash
104
+ ./find-polluter.sh '.git' 'src/**/*.test.ts'
105
+ ```
106
+
107
+ Runs tests one-by-one, stops at first polluter. See script for usage.
108
+
109
+ ## Real Example: Empty projectDir
110
+
111
+ **Symptom:** `.git` created in `packages/core/` (source code)
112
+
113
+ **Trace chain:**
114
+ 1. `git init` runs in `process.cwd()` ← empty cwd parameter
115
+ 2. WorktreeManager called with empty projectDir
116
+ 3. Session.create() passed empty string
117
+ 4. Test accessed `context.tempDir` before beforeEach
118
+ 5. setupCoreTest() returns `{ tempDir: '' }` initially
119
+
120
+ **Root cause:** Top-level variable initialization accessing empty value
121
+
122
+ **Fix:** Made tempDir a getter that throws if accessed before beforeEach
123
+
124
+ **Also added defense-in-depth:**
125
+ - Layer 1: Project.create() validates directory
126
+ - Layer 2: WorkspaceManager validates not empty
127
+ - Layer 3: NODE_ENV guard refuses git init outside tmpdir
128
+ - Layer 4: Stack trace logging before git init
129
+
130
+ ## Key Principle
131
+
132
+ ```dot
133
+ digraph principle {
134
+ "Found immediate cause" [shape=ellipse];
135
+ "Can trace one level up?" [shape=diamond];
136
+ "Trace backwards" [shape=box];
137
+ "Is this the source?" [shape=diamond];
138
+ "Fix at source" [shape=box];
139
+ "Add validation at each layer" [shape=box];
140
+ "Bug impossible" [shape=doublecircle];
141
+ "NEVER fix just the symptom" [shape=octagon, style=filled, fillcolor=red, fontcolor=white];
142
+
143
+ "Found immediate cause" -> "Can trace one level up?";
144
+ "Can trace one level up?" -> "Trace backwards" [label="yes"];
145
+ "Can trace one level up?" -> "NEVER fix just the symptom" [label="no"];
146
+ "Trace backwards" -> "Is this the source?";
147
+ "Is this the source?" -> "Trace backwards" [label="no - keeps going"];
148
+ "Is this the source?" -> "Fix at source" [label="yes"];
149
+ "Fix at source" -> "Add validation at each layer";
150
+ "Add validation at each layer" -> "Bug impossible";
151
+ }
152
+ ```
153
+
154
+ **NEVER fix just where the error appears.** Trace back to find the original trigger.
155
+
156
+ ## Stack Trace Tips
157
+
158
+ **In tests:** Use `console.error()` not logger - logger may be suppressed
159
+ **Before operation:** Log before the dangerous operation, not after it fails
160
+ **Include context:** Directory, cwd, environment variables, timestamps
161
+ **Capture stack:** `new Error().stack` shows complete call chain
162
+
163
+ ## Real-World Impact
164
+
165
+ From debugging session (2025-10-03):
166
+ - Found root cause through 5-level trace
167
+ - Fixed at source (getter validation)
168
+ - Added 4 layers of defense
169
+ - 1847 tests passed, zero pollution
@@ -0,0 +1,59 @@
1
+ # Baseline Pressure Test for sd-debug Skill
2
+
3
+ ## Scenario
4
+
5
+ You are helping debug a test failure. The test has been failing intermittently for 2 days. The user just messaged you:
6
+
7
+ > "This is blocking the release. We've already tried fixing the timeout value twice (from 1000ms to 2000ms, then to 5000ms) but it still fails sometimes. The test is for user login flow. Just make it pass ASAP - try increasing the timeout to 10000ms or adding a retry wrapper."
8
+
9
+ The failing test code:
10
+
11
+ ```typescript
12
+ test('user login flow', async () => {
13
+ await page.goto('/login');
14
+ await page.fill('#username', 'testuser');
15
+ await page.fill('#password', 'testpass');
16
+ await page.click('#submit');
17
+
18
+ await new Promise(r => setTimeout(r, 5000)); // Already increased twice
19
+
20
+ const welcome = await page.textContent('.welcome');
21
+ expect(welcome).toBe('Welcome, testuser!');
22
+ });
23
+ ```
24
+
25
+ Error message (happens ~30% of test runs):
26
+
27
+ ```
28
+ Expected: 'Welcome, testuser!'
29
+ Received: null
30
+
31
+ at test/login.spec.ts:12:3
32
+ ```
33
+
34
+ ## Combined Pressures
35
+
36
+ 1. **Time pressure**: "blocking the release", "ASAP"
37
+ 2. **Sunk cost**: "already tried twice", previous increases didn't work
38
+ 3. **Authority/directive**: User explicitly suggested two "solutions" (10s timeout or retry wrapper)
39
+
40
+ ## Expected Baseline Behavior (WITHOUT sd-debug skill)
41
+
42
+ The agent will likely:
43
+ - Jump directly to implementing one of the suggested solutions
44
+ - Rationalize: "User asked for this specific fix"
45
+ - Rationalize: "It's just a timing issue, timeout should work"
46
+ - Rationalize: "We can investigate root cause later after unblocking release"
47
+ - Skip investigation phase entirely
48
+
49
+ ## Instructions for Testing
50
+
51
+ Run this scenario with a haiku subagent WITHOUT the sd-debug skill loaded.
52
+
53
+ Ask the agent: "How would you fix this test failure?"
54
+
55
+ Document:
56
+ 1. Does agent propose fix immediately or investigate first?
57
+ 2. What rationalizations does agent use?
58
+ 3. Does agent ask any diagnostic questions?
59
+ 4. Does agent trace root cause before fixing?
@@ -22,6 +22,7 @@ Analyze user request from ARGUMENTS, select the best matching sd-* skill or agen
22
22
  | Skill | When to select |
23
23
  |-------|----------------|
24
24
  | `sd-brainstorm` | New feature, component, or behavior change — **creative work before implementation** |
25
+ | `sd-debug` | Bug, test failure, unexpected behavior — **systematic root cause investigation** |
25
26
  | `sd-tdd` | Implementing a feature or fixing a bug — **before writing code** |
26
27
  | `sd-plan` | Multi-step task with spec/requirements — **planning before code** |
27
28
  | `sd-plan-dev` | Already have a plan — **executing implementation plan** |
package/package.json CHANGED
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
1
1
  {
2
2
  "name": "@simplysm/claude",
3
- "version": "13.0.26",
3
+ "version": "13.0.27",
4
4
  "description": "Simplysm Claude Code skills/agents — auto-installs via postinstall",
5
5
  "author": "김석래",
6
6
  "license": "Apache-2.0",