@semanticintent/semantic-chirp-intelligence-mcp 3.0.0

package/build/config/tool-metadata.js

@@ -0,0 +1,113 @@
+/**
+ * Tool Metadata Configuration
+ *
+ * Semantic Anchoring Governance markers for all tools
+ */
+export const TOOL_METADATA = {
+    get_team_roster: {
+        chirp_style: "analytical_assessment",
+        discovery_tags: ["roster", "lineup", "players", "status", "team"],
+        intent_category: "team_assessment",
+        hockey_context: "roster_analysis",
+        chirp_potential: "roster_weaknesses"
+    },
+    get_league_standings: {
+        chirp_style: "competitive_reality",
+        discovery_tags: ["standings", "league", "competition", "rankings", "position"],
+        intent_category: "league_awareness",
+        hockey_context: "competitive_landscape",
+        chirp_potential: "standings_truth"
+    },
+    get_current_matchup: {
+        chirp_style: "matchup_assessment",
+        discovery_tags: ["matchup", "opponent", "week", "competition", "stats"],
+        intent_category: "weekly_strategy",
+        hockey_context: "head_to_head_battle",
+        chirp_potential: "matchup_reality"
+    },
+    get_games_in_hand: {
+        chirp_style: "strategic_advantage",
+        discovery_tags: ["schedule", "advantage", "games", "strategy", "matchup"],
+        intent_category: "competitive_intelligence",
+        hockey_context: "schedule_warfare",
+        chirp_potential: "schedule_domination",
+        // 🆕 Template Pattern Metadata
+        uses_template_pattern: true,
+        analysis_class: "GamesInHandAnalysis",
+        template_version: "1.0.0",
+        analysis_type: "schedule_advantage"
+    },
+    get_streaming_recommendations: {
+        chirp_style: "opportunity_hunter",
+        discovery_tags: ["pickups", "waivers", "streaming", "schedule", "trends"],
+        intent_category: "acquisition_strategy",
+        hockey_context: "waiver_wire_mastery",
+        chirp_potential: "pickup_strategy",
+        // 🆕 Template Pattern Metadata
+        uses_template_pattern: true,
+        analysis_class: "StreamingAnalysis",
+        template_version: "1.0.0",
+        analysis_type: "streaming_strategy"
+    },
+    get_roster_transaction_recommendations: {
+        chirp_style: "ice_cold_truth",
+        discovery_tags: ["optimization", "ICE", "championship", "decisions", "transactions"],
+        intent_category: "ultimate_advisor",
+        hockey_context: "league_domination",
+        chirp_potential: "brutal_optimization",
+        is_ice_engine: true,
+        tool_semantic_identity: "ICE - Intent Chirp Engine",
+        // 🆕 Template Pattern Metadata
+        uses_template_pattern: true,
+        analysis_class: "IceAnalysis",
+        template_version: "1.0.0",
+        analysis_type: "ice_roster"
+    },
+    get_weekly_stats: {
+        chirp_style: "performance_review",
+        discovery_tags: ["stats", "weekly", "performance", "matchup", "analysis"],
+        intent_category: "performance_tracking",
+        hockey_context: "stat_battle",
+        chirp_potential: "weekly_performance"
+    },
+    compare_matchup: {
+        chirp_style: "head_to_head_analysis",
+        discovery_tags: ["comparison", "matchup", "opponent", "strategy", "categories"],
+        intent_category: "tactical_analysis",
+        hockey_context: "category_warfare",
+        chirp_potential: "matchup_insights"
+    },
+    optimize_lineup: {
+        chirp_style: "lineup_optimization",
+        discovery_tags: ["lineup", "optimization", "active", "bench", "strategy"],
+        intent_category: "daily_management",
+        hockey_context: "lineup_strategy",
+        chirp_potential: "lineup_fixes",
+        // 🆕 Template Pattern Metadata
+        uses_template_pattern: true,
+        analysis_class: "LineupAnalysis",
+        template_version: "1.0.0",
+        analysis_type: "lineup_optimization"
+    },
+    search_players: {
+        chirp_style: "player_discovery",
+        discovery_tags: ["search", "players", "available", "free_agents", "discovery"],
+        intent_category: "player_research",
+        hockey_context: "talent_scouting",
+        chirp_potential: "player_insights"
+    },
+    get_player_stats: {
+        chirp_style: "player_evaluation",
+        discovery_tags: ["stats", "player", "performance", "evaluation", "analysis"],
+        intent_category: "player_analysis",
+        hockey_context: "individual_assessment",
+        chirp_potential: "player_reality"
+    },
+    get_trending_players: {
+        chirp_style: "trend_hunting",
+        discovery_tags: ["trends", "hot", "cold", "momentum", "pickups"],
+        intent_category: "market_intelligence",
+        hockey_context: "waiver_trends",
+        chirp_potential: "trend_opportunities"
+    }
+};

package/build/domain/governance.js

@@ -0,0 +1,322 @@
+/**
+ * 🏛️ Semantic Anchoring Governance System
+ *
+ * This module implements the complete Semantic Anchoring Governance framework
+ * across all 5 phases:
+ * - Phase 1: Semantic Markers and Tool Identity
+ * - Phase 2: Immutability Protection
+ * - Phase 3: Semantic Contract Validation
+ * - Phase 4: Documentation
+ * - Phase 5: Runtime Governance Enforcement
+ *
+ * Governance Rules:
+ * - Rule 1: Semantic Over Structural - Decisions based on semantic properties
+ * - Rule 2: Intent Preservation - Semantic intent validated through transformations
+ * - Rule 3: Observable Anchoring - Decisions based on observable semantic properties
+ * - Rule 4: Immutability Protection - Semantic contracts cannot be mutated
+ */
+// ==========================================
+// 📈 Runtime Governance Monitor
+// ==========================================
+/**
+ * 🏛️ GOVERNANCE_MONITOR
+ *
+ * Central monitoring system for all governance enforcement.
+ * Tracks violations, contracts, immutability enforcement, and semantic decisions.
+ *
+ * Enhanced in Template Pattern Migration:
+ * - Added analysis execution tracking
+ * - Added performance monitoring
+ * - Added analysis-specific metrics
+ */
+export const GOVERNANCE_MONITOR = {
+    // Existing governance metrics (Phases 1-5)
+    violations: [],
+    contracts_validated: 0,
+    immutability_enforced: 0,
+    semantic_decisions: 0,
+    // 🆕 NEW: Analysis tracking (Template Pattern)
+    analyses_executed: 0,
+    analysis_by_type: new Map(),
+    analysis_durations: [],
+    /**
+     * Track a governance violation
+     * Automatically adds timestamp and maintains violation history
+     */
+    trackViolation(violation) {
+        this.violations.push({
+            ...violation,
+            timestamp: new Date()
+        });
+        // Keep only last 100 violations to prevent memory growth
+        if (this.violations.length > 100) {
+            this.violations = this.violations.slice(-100);
+        }
+    },
+    /**
+     * 🆕 Track analysis start
+     * Called when template method begins execution
+     */
+    trackAnalysisStart(type) {
+        if (process.env.NODE_ENV === "development") {
+            console.log(`[GOVERNANCE] Analysis started: ${type}`);
+        }
+    },
+    /**
+     * 🆕 Track analysis completion
+     * Records execution time and updates metrics
+     */
+    trackAnalysisComplete(type, duration_ms) {
+        this.analyses_executed++;
+        this.analysis_by_type.set(type, (this.analysis_by_type.get(type) || 0) + 1);
+        this.analysis_durations.push({
+            type,
+            duration_ms,
+            timestamp: new Date()
+        });
+        // Keep only last 100 duration records
+        if (this.analysis_durations.length > 100) {
+            this.analysis_durations = this.analysis_durations.slice(-100);
+        }
+        if (process.env.NODE_ENV === "development") {
+            console.log(`[GOVERNANCE] Analysis completed: ${type} (${duration_ms}ms)`);
+        }
+    },
+    /**
+     * Get governance health report
+     * Returns comprehensive metrics about system health
+     */
+    getHealthReport() {
+        const warnings = this.violations.filter(v => v.severity === "warning").length;
+        const errors = this.violations.filter(v => v.severity === "error").length;
+        return {
+            total_violations: this.violations.length,
+            warnings,
+            errors,
+            contracts_validated: this.contracts_validated,
+            immutability_enforced: this.immutability_enforced,
+            semantic_decisions: this.semantic_decisions,
+            recent_violations: this.violations.slice(-10), // Last 10 violations
+            // 🆕 Analysis metrics
+            analyses_executed: this.analyses_executed,
+            analysis_by_type: Object.fromEntries(this.analysis_by_type),
+            avg_duration_ms: this.calculateAverageDuration(),
+            slowest_analysis: this.getSlowestAnalysis()
+        };
+    },
+    /**
+     * 🆕 Calculate average analysis duration
+     */
+    calculateAverageDuration() {
+        if (this.analysis_durations.length === 0)
+            return 0;
+        const total = this.analysis_durations.reduce((sum, d) => sum + d.duration_ms, 0);
+        return Math.round(total / this.analysis_durations.length);
+    },
+    /**
+     * 🆕 Get slowest analysis from recent executions
+     */
+    getSlowestAnalysis() {
+        if (this.analysis_durations.length === 0)
+            return null;
+        return this.analysis_durations.reduce((slowest, current) => current.duration_ms > slowest.duration_ms ? current : slowest);
+    },
+    /**
+     * Reset monitoring counters (for testing)
+     */
+    reset() {
+        this.violations = [];
+        this.contracts_validated = 0;
+        this.immutability_enforced = 0;
+        this.semantic_decisions = 0;
+        this.analyses_executed = 0;
+        this.analysis_by_type.clear();
+        this.analysis_durations = [];
+    }
+};
+// ==========================================
+// 🔍 Semantic Contract Audit Logger
+// ==========================================
+/**
+ * Audit semantic contract operations
+ * Logs contract state during validation, enforcement, and decisions
+ *
+ * @param contract - The semantic contract being audited
+ * @param toolName - Name of the tool processing the contract
+ * @param phase - Which phase of processing (validation, enforcement, decision)
+ */
+export function auditSemanticContract(contract, toolName, phase) {
+    const audit = {
+        phase,
+        tool_name: toolName,
+        semantic_intent: contract.semantic_intent,
+        enable_chirp: contract.enable_chirp,
+        chirp_intensity: contract.chirp_intensity,
+        personality_mode: contract.personality_mode,
+        tool_context: contract.tool_context,
+        timestamp: new Date().toISOString()
+    };
+    // Log to console in development mode
+    if (process.env.NODE_ENV === "development") {
+        console.log(`🔍 Semantic Audit [${phase}]:`, JSON.stringify(audit, null, 2));
+    }
+    // Update monitoring counters
+    if (phase === "validation") {
+        GOVERNANCE_MONITOR.contracts_validated++;
+    }
+    else if (phase === "enforcement") {
+        GOVERNANCE_MONITOR.immutability_enforced++;
+    }
+    else if (phase === "decision") {
+        GOVERNANCE_MONITOR.semantic_decisions++;
+    }
+}
+// ==========================================
+// 🏥 Governance Health Check
+// ==========================================
+/**
+ * Check governance system health
+ * Returns status and actionable recommendations
+ */
+export function checkGovernanceHealth() {
+    const report = GOVERNANCE_MONITOR.getHealthReport();
+    const recommendations = [];
+    let status = "healthy";
+    // Check error rate
+    if (report.errors > 10) {
+        status = "critical";
+        recommendations.push("Critical: High error rate detected. Review recent violations immediately.");
+    }
+    else if (report.errors > 0) {
+        status = "degraded";
+        recommendations.push("Warning: Governance errors detected. Review violation logs.");
+    }
+    // Check warning rate
+    if (report.warnings > 20) {
+        if (status !== "critical")
+            status = "degraded";
+        recommendations.push("Warning: High warning rate. Review semantic contract usage patterns.");
+    }
+    // Check validation rate
+    if (report.contracts_validated === 0) {
+        recommendations.push("Info: No contracts validated yet. System may not be processing requests.");
+    }
+    // 🆕 Check analysis performance
+    if (report.avg_duration_ms > 5000) {
+        if (status !== "critical")
+            status = "degraded";
+        recommendations.push(`Performance: Average analysis duration is ${report.avg_duration_ms}ms (threshold: 5000ms)`);
+    }
+    if (recommendations.length === 0) {
+        recommendations.push("System is operating within governance parameters.");
+    }
+    return { status, report, recommendations };
+}
+// ==========================================
+// 📚 Semantic Contract Validation
+// ==========================================
+/**
+ * 🏛️ validateSemanticChirpContract Function:
+ * Enforces Semantic Anchoring Governance Rule 2 (Intent Preservation) by validating
+ * that semantic intent is preserved through chirp parameter transformations.
+ *
+ * Purpose:
+ * Ensures that chirp parameters maintain semantic coherence and prevents accidental
+ * or malicious violations of user intent.
+ *
+ * Governance Principles:
+ * - User intent has highest priority and must never be overridden
+ * - System defaults should be semantically consistent
+ * - Tool-specific overrides must be confined to their tool context
+ * - Conflicting intentions should be detected and reported
+ *
+ * Validation Cases:
+ *
+ * Case 1: User-Requested Disable
+ *   Scenario: User explicitly sets enable_chirp=false with semantic_intent="user_requested"
+ *   Action: Allow and preserve user intent (highest priority)
+ *   Governance: Protects user autonomy and semantic control
+ *
+ * Case 2: Default Behavior
+ *   Scenario: enable_chirp is undefined or true (system default)
+ *   Action: Allow as valid default semantic behavior
+ *   Governance: System defaults are semantically consistent
+ *
+ * Case 3: Ice Cold Intensity Validation
+ *   Scenario: chirp_intensity="ice_cold" without explicit semantic intent
+ *   Action: Warn if used on non-ICE tools (may be accidental)
+ *   Governance: Prevents unintentional semantic shifts in tool behavior
+ *   Rationale: ice_cold is semantically strong and should be intentional
+ *
+ * Case 4: Conflicting Intent Detection
+ *   Scenario: enable_chirp=false but chirp_intensity is specified
+ *   Action: Log warning about semantic contradiction
+ *   Governance: Detects semantic incoherence in parameters
+ *   Rationale: Disabled chirp with intensity setting is semantically inconsistent
+ *
+ * Case 5: Tool Override Protection
+ *   Scenario: semantic_intent="tool_override" with mismatched tool_context
+ *   Action: Throw error (strict enforcement)
+ *   Governance: Prevents semantic contract violations across tool boundaries
+ *   Rationale: Tool overrides must stay within their semantic domain
+ *
+ * @param contract - The semantic contract to validate
+ * @param toolName - Name of the tool requesting validation
+ * @param toolMetadata - Optional tool metadata for semantic property checks
+ */
+export function validateSemanticChirpContract(contract, toolName, toolMetadata) {
+    // 🔍 Phase 5: Audit contract validation
+    auditSemanticContract(contract, toolName, "validation");
+    // Rule 2: Intent Preservation - validate semantic coherence
+    // Case 1: User explicitly disabled chirp - valid semantic intent
+    if (contract.enable_chirp === false && contract.semantic_intent === "user_requested") {
+        return; // Valid: User intent to disable is preserved
+    }
+    // Case 2: Default behavior - chirp enabled unless explicitly disabled
+    if (contract.enable_chirp === undefined || contract.enable_chirp === true) {
+        // This is valid default behavior
+        return;
+    }
+    // Case 3: ice_cold intensity should be intentional, not accidental
+    if (contract.chirp_intensity === "ice_cold" && !contract.semantic_intent) {
+        // Log warning but allow (ICE tool deliberately uses ice_cold as default)
+        if (toolMetadata && !toolMetadata.is_ice_engine) {
+            const warning = `ice_cold intensity without explicit intent on non-ICE tool '${toolName}'`;
+            console.error(`⚠️ Semantic Warning: ${warning}`);
+            // 📊 Phase 5: Track governance violation
+            GOVERNANCE_MONITOR.trackViolation({
+                rule: "Rule 2 - Intent Preservation",
+                severity: "warning",
+                tool_name: toolName,
+                violation_type: "unintentional_intensity",
+                details: warning
+            });
+        }
+    }
+    // Case 4: Detect conflicting semantic intentions
+    if (contract.enable_chirp === false && contract.chirp_intensity) {
+        const warning = `Conflicting intent - chirp disabled but intensity specified for '${toolName}'`;
+        console.error(`⚠️ Semantic Warning: ${warning}`);
+        // 📊 Phase 5: Track governance violation
+        GOVERNANCE_MONITOR.trackViolation({
+            rule: "Rule 2 - Intent Preservation",
+            severity: "warning",
+            tool_name: toolName,
+            violation_type: "conflicting_intent",
+            details: warning
+        });
+    }
+    // Case 5: Tool override should only be used by system, not user input
+    if (contract.semantic_intent === "tool_override" && contract.tool_context !== toolName) {
+        const error = `tool_override intent mismatch for '${toolName}' - expected context '${toolName}', got '${contract.tool_context}'`;
+        // 📊 Phase 5: Track governance violation
+        GOVERNANCE_MONITOR.trackViolation({
+            rule: "Rule 2 - Intent Preservation",
+            severity: "error",
+            tool_name: toolName,
+            violation_type: "tool_override_mismatch",
+            details: error
+        });
+        throw new Error(`🚨 Semantic contract violation: ${error}`);
+    }
+}

package/build/domain/types.js

@@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
+/**
+ * 🏛️ Domain Types - Semantic Chirp Intelligence MCP
+ *
+ * This file contains all core type definitions and interfaces for the
+ * Yahoo Fantasy MCP with Template Method Pattern implementation.
+ *
+ * Organized by domain:
+ * - Analysis Types
+ * - Chirp Intelligence
+ * - Yahoo API Data
+ * - Recommendations
+ * - Responses
+ */
+export {};

package/build/experimental/semantic-breakout-tool.js

@@ -0,0 +1,188 @@
+/**
+ * Semantic Breakout Tool Integration
+ *
+ * Implements breakout player analysis using semantic intent pattern.
+ * This tool uses natural language intent to auto-configure the MCP tool.
+ */
+import { SemanticIntentParser } from './semantic-intent-parser.js';
+/**
+ * Semantic tool definition for breakout player analysis
+ *
+ * This comprehensive prompt integrates:
+ * - Data-driven predictability (40% recent, 30% projections, 20% opportunity, 10% risk)
+ * - External source references (Rotowire, NHL EDGE, DobberHockey)
+ * - Position-specific filtering
+ * - League context awareness
+ */
+export const SEMANTIC_BREAKOUT_ANALYSIS = {
+    name: "analyze_breakout_players",
+    description: "Analyze free agents to identify top pickups and breakout candidates using comprehensive data-driven scoring",
+    semanticIntent: `
+    I analyze free agents in Yahoo Fantasy Hockey to recommend top 5-10 pickups and 3-5 breakout candidates.
+    I use a predictable scoring formula: 40% recent performance + 30% projections + 20% opportunity - 10% risk.
+    I focus on players under 50% owned and provide position-specific analysis.
+
+    I need: position filter (optional array of strings like ["C", "RW"]),
+            ownership threshold (optional number, default 50),
+            breakout age max (optional number, default 26),
+            minimum score (optional number, default 0),
+            max results (optional number, default 10),
+            chirp intensity (optional string),
+            personality mode (optional string),
+            enable chirp (optional boolean)
+
+    I will: Yahoo API calls, statistical analysis, trend detection, opportunity scoring, risk assessment
+
+    I return: Top pickups with scores, breakout candidates, position breakdown, market intelligence
+
+    I estimate: moderate complexity, 3000 tokens
+  `
+};
+/**
+ * Parse semantic intent for breakout analysis
+ */
+export function parseBreakoutAnalysisIntent() {
+    const parser = new SemanticIntentParser();
+    return parser.parseIntent(SEMANTIC_BREAKOUT_ANALYSIS.semanticIntent);
+}
+/**
+ * Get MCP input schema from semantic intent
+ */
+export function getBreakoutAnalysisInputSchema() {
+    const parsed = parseBreakoutAnalysisIntent();
+    // Build schema from parsed parameters
+    const properties = {};
+    const required = [];
+    for (const param of parsed.parameters) {
+        properties[param.name] = {
+            type: param.type,
+            description: param.description
+        };
+        if (param.required) {
+            required.push(param.name);
+        }
+    }
+    // Add enum constraints for specific parameters
+    if (properties.chirp_intensity) {
+        properties.chirp_intensity.enum = ['gentle', 'standard', 'savage', 'ice_cold'];
+    }
+    if (properties.personality_mode) {
+        properties.personality_mode.enum = ['analytical', 'motivational', 'roast_master', 'championship_coach'];
+    }
+    if (properties.position_filter) {
+        properties.position_filter.items = { type: 'string' };
+    }
+    return {
+        type: "object",
+        properties,
+        required: required.length > 0 ? required : undefined
+    };
+}
+/**
+ * Execute breakout analysis with semantic configuration
+ */
+export async function executeBreakoutAnalysis(args, breakoutAnalysis) {
+    const parsed = parseBreakoutAnalysisIntent();
+    // Build semantic contract
+    const semanticContract = {
+        chirp_intensity: args.chirp_intensity || 'standard',
+        personality_mode: args.personality_mode || 'analytical',
+        enable_chirp: args.enable_chirp !== false,
+        semantic_intent: 'user_requested',
+        tool_context: 'analyze_breakout_players'
+    };
+    // Build analysis args
+    const analysisArgs = {
+        position_filter: args.position_filter,
+        ownership_threshold: args.ownership_threshold,
+        breakout_age_max: args.breakout_age_max,
+        min_score: args.min_score,
+        max_results: args.max_results
+    };
+    try {
+        // Execute analysis using template pattern
+        const result = await breakoutAnalysis.executeAnalysis(analysisArgs, semanticContract);
+        // Enhance with semantic metadata
+        return {
+            ...result,
+            _semantic_metadata: {
+                tool_name: SEMANTIC_BREAKOUT_ANALYSIS.name,
+                parsed_capabilities: parsed.capabilities,
+                parse_confidence: `${(parsed.confidence * 100).toFixed(0)}%`,
+                message: '✅ Tool auto-configured from semantic intent!',
+                prompt_integration: {
+                    scoring_formula: '40% recent + 30% projections + 20% opportunity - 10% risk',
+                    external_sources: 'Ready for: Rotowire, NHL EDGE, DobberHockey integration',
+                    data_driven: 'Predictable rankings with confidence scores'
+                }
+            }
+        };
+    }
+    catch (error) {
+        throw new Error(`Breakout analysis failed: ${error instanceof Error ? error.message : String(error)}`);
+    }
+}
+/**
+ * Improved prompt recommendations for Claude Desktop integration
+ */
+export const BREAKOUT_PROMPT_IMPROVEMENTS = {
+    semantic_clarity: {
+        original: "Complex multi-paragraph template with embedded formulas",
+        improved: "Structured semantic intent with clear I need/I will/I return sections",
+        benefit: "Claude Desktop can better understand tool purpose and auto-suggest when user asks about breakouts"
+    },
+    parameter_discovery: {
+        original: "Parameters embedded in prose",
+        improved: "Explicit parameter definitions with types and optionality",
+        benefit: "MCP can auto-generate input schema, reducing manual configuration"
+    },
+    capability_mapping: {
+        original: "References to external sources without integration plan",
+        improved: "Capability tags (yahoo_api, data_analysis) that map to available functions",
+        benefit: "Tool knows what it can and cannot do, preventing hallucination"
+    },
+    predictability_enhancement: {
+        original: "Scoring formula mentioned in prose",
+        improved: "Formula implemented in code with observable weights",
+        benefit: "Consistent, repeatable results that users can trust"
+    },
+    integration_points: {
+        yahoo_api: "Direct integration via YahooApiClient",
+        rotowire: "Placeholder for future web scraping capability",
+        nhl_edge: "Placeholder for NHL API integration",
+        dobber_hockey: "Placeholder for prospect data integration"
+    },
+    usage_with_claude_desktop: `
+When user asks: "tell me about breakout players" or "who should I pick up?"
+
+Claude Desktop will:
+1. Recognize semantic intent matches analyze_breakout_players tool
+2. Auto-extract parameters from conversation context (league format, roster needs)
+3. Call tool with appropriate chirp settings (analytical by default)
+4. Present results in conversational format with player tables and reasoning
+
+Example interaction:
+User: "I need a right wing, who are the best breakout candidates?"
+
+Claude: *uses analyze_breakout_players with position_filter=["RW"]*
+
+        "Based on data-driven analysis, here are the top RW breakout candidates:
+
+        🏒 Must-Adds (Score 80+):
+        1. [Player Name] (Team) - 85 score
+           - Catalyst: Top-6 center opportunity
+           - Recent: 0.9 PPG | Projected: 0.7 FPG
+           - Risk: Low (15%)
+           - Confidence: High
+
+        2. [Player Name] (Team) - 82 score
+           ...
+
+        📊 Position Analysis:
+        - RW pool strength: 15 candidates with 65+ scores
+        - Market trend: RW pickups trending up 23%
+        - Recommendation: Act fast on must-adds
+
+        💡 Next steps: Should I analyze your roster to see who you could drop?"
+  `
+};