@sema-agent/client-core 0.11.6 → 0.11.7

This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
@@ -79,6 +79,8 @@ export interface TaskRequestInput {
79
79
  promptProfile?: string;
80
80
  enableFork?: boolean;
81
81
  attachments?: Record<string, unknown>;
82
+ /** 预上传附件句柄(`uploadAttachment` 回执 id)。空数组 = 没带附件 ⇒ 整键不 stamp。 */
83
+ attachmentIds?: readonly string[];
82
84
  finalVerification?: boolean;
83
85
  limits?: Record<string, unknown>;
84
86
  interactiveTools?: false;
@@ -28,7 +28,12 @@ export const REQUEST_FIELD_MATRIX = [
28
28
  { field: 'finalVerification', lanes: ['print'], live: true, why: 'P1-1 终验:无人值守车道才需要引擎自证;交互 REPL 由人当场看结果。#106 裁 B(让位+告知)后交互面默认关' },
29
29
  { field: 'limits', lanes: ['print'], live: true, why: 'P2-3-b:`-p` 的预算护栏(--max-* flag 族),交互 REPL 由人随时 Esc' },
30
30
  { field: 'interactiveTools', lanes: ['print'], live: true, why: '[909]B 件3:无人值守 stamp false,从 roster 源头灭掉 AskUserQuestion/plan 门。交互车道 stamp false 等于自废武功' },
31
- // ── TUI 独有 ────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
31
+ // ── interactive 车道独有 ────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
32
+ // ⚠️ 「interactive」**不等于**「TUI」:web 的 BFF lane 也报 `interactive`
33
+ // (`sema-web-client` `WEB_REQUEST_LANE`)。下面多数条目的理由写的是壳的 TUI 面 —— 它们是
34
+ // B4 从壳的三个构造器逐行读出来的,那时这条车道只有壳一个消费者。`attachmentIds` 是**反过来**
35
+ // 的第一条:它今天只有 web/desktop 在发,壳反而没有这个入口。别把本节读成「壳独有」。
36
+ { field: 'attachmentIds', lanes: ['interactive'], live: true, why: '附件**字节通道**(uploadAttachment 回执 id;server ≥1.289 绑定会话并把文件物化进 run 的 attachments/)。有上传入口的端才有 id 可引用:web/desktop 有,壳走 images / 本地文件路径,`-p` 车道连 uploadAttachment 都没有 ⇒ print 缺席是**没有来源**,不是漏。🔴 与上面的 `attachments` 同名不同物(那是 turn 边界的配置键),两条永远不许合并' },
32
37
  { field: 'settings.ultracode', lanes: ['interactive'], live: true, why: 'design/111:sticky `/effort ultracode` 拨盘 + 当轮关键词嗅探,两个来源都只在交互面存在', gap: true },
33
38
  { field: 'systemPrompt', lanes: ['interactive'], live: false, why: 'CC QueryParams.systemPrompt;print 腿的 params 没有这一位' },
34
39
  { field: 'reasoningEffort', lanes: ['interactive'], live: false, why: '`/effort` 拨盘存在 AppState,print 无 AppState', gap: true },
@@ -106,6 +111,10 @@ export function buildTaskRequest(input, lane) {
106
111
  ...(on('promptProfile', input.promptProfile) ? { promptProfile: input.promptProfile } : {}),
107
112
  ...(on('enableFork', input.enableFork) ? { enableFork: input.enableFork } : {}),
108
113
  ...(on('attachments', input.attachments) ? { attachments: input.attachments } : {}),
114
+ // 空数组按 `images` 同款处理:没带附件与「带了 0 个附件」在 wire 上是同一件事,发小的那个。
115
+ ...(on('attachmentIds', input.attachmentIds) && (input.attachmentIds?.length ?? 0) > 0
116
+ ? { attachmentIds: [...(input.attachmentIds ?? [])] }
117
+ : {}),
109
118
  ...(on('clientContext', input.clientContext) ? { clientContext: input.clientContext } : {}),
110
119
  ...(on('scratchpadDir', input.scratchpadDir) ? { scratchpadDir: input.scratchpadDir } : {}),
111
120
  ...(on('finalVerification', input.finalVerification)
@@ -10,8 +10,12 @@
10
10
  * 「接缝记账」里写下的第 1 条,它一直没被销账的原因就是没有任何机制会让它红。
11
11
  *
12
12
  * 落点为什么是本包:desktop 与 web 都已经依赖 `@sema-agent/client-core`(0.11.5),而本文件是
13
- * **纯类型 + 常量 + 纯谓词**,零 import、零 Node 内建 ⇒ 不动本包的可移植闭包(portability 门的
13
+ * **纯类型 + 常量 + 纯谓词**,零值级 import、零 Node 内建 ⇒ 不动本包的可移植闭包(portability 门的
14
14
  * `EXPECTED_PACKAGES_INDEX` 一个字不变)。
15
+ * ⚠️ 唯一一条 `import type`(`./effortWire.js` 的 `ReasoningEffort`)是**类型边**:portability 门
16
+ * 走值级传递闭包时按规则剥掉 type-only import(门里 `/^\s*type\b/` 那一跳),bundle 里一个字节都
17
+ * 不多。写成 import 而不是就地复刻那七档,是因为「座位闭集」与「wire 投影闭集」必须是**同一套词**
18
+ * ——复刻一份就等于埋一条只有真用户能发现的漂移(拨盘上的档在座位 lane 上静默到不了引擎)。
15
19
  *
16
20
  * ── 搬迁时按「真源为准」收敛的漂移(逐条,web 侧镜像 → 本文件)────────────────────────────
17
21
  * 🔴 D1 `LocalSessionEvent.outcome` —— web 镜像整位缺席 ⇒ `tool_permission_resolved` 只会清面,
@@ -50,6 +54,7 @@
50
54
  * neutral typed position. Our implementation体 differs (sema wire via @sema-agent/sdk +
51
55
  * @sema-agent/client-core), the contract shape does not.
52
56
  */
57
+ import type { ReasoningEffort } from "./effortWire.js";
53
58
  export type EipcMethodKind = "invoke" | "event";
54
59
  export interface EipcMethodSpec {
55
60
  kind: EipcMethodKind;
@@ -258,6 +263,29 @@ export declare const PERMISSION_MODE_INTENTS: readonly PermissionModeIntent[];
258
263
  /** Per-task attachment cap — the server's own limit (`attachmentIds` > 16 ⇒ 400). Gated here so the
259
264
  * seat gets a precise local error instead of a wire 400 halfway through a turn. */
260
265
  export declare const ATTACHMENT_IDS_PER_TASK_CAP = 16;
266
+ /** The per-turn `reasoningEffort` accept-set — core's ThinkingLevel tiers, re-exported from the
267
+ * package's own wire projection (`effortWire.ReasoningEffort`) rather than re-typed here.
268
+ *
269
+ * CLOSED for the same reason `PERMISSION_MODE_INTENTS` is: the word ORIGINATES in our own composer
270
+ * and travels OUT to a wire that 400s (fail-loud) on an unknown tier — so an unknown value is a
271
+ * local bug we want reported at the seat's door, not a future wire word to tolerate. `ultracode` is
272
+ * deliberately NOT a tier here: in CC it is a standalone `settings.ultracode` preset boolean that
273
+ * COEXISTS with `xhigh` (see `SeatTurnSettings`), and folding it into this axis is exactly how the
274
+ * orchestration axis gets eaten by the reasoning axis. */
275
+ export declare const SEAT_REASONING_EFFORTS: readonly ReasoningEffort[];
276
+ /** The `settings` sub-object a seat turn may carry. A CLOSED set with its own name list + pin,
277
+ * exactly like the top-level request: `SEND_MESSAGE_REQUEST_KEYS` checks `keyof SendMessageRequest`
278
+ * (top-level names), so a dotted `"settings.ultracode"` entry could never be pinned by `Covers` —
279
+ * the shape that stays consistent with the existing closed sets is one top-level key plus a nested
280
+ * closed set of its own. */
281
+ export interface SeatTurnSettings {
282
+ /** CC's `settings.ultracode` PRESET boolean (max thinking × workflow orchestration, service ≥1.48.0
283
+ * reads `body.settings.ultracode` and expands it). NOT a seventh effort tier — the dial separately
284
+ * coerces the reasoning axis to `xhigh`, and collapsing the two loses the orchestration half
285
+ * (`ultracodeWireCaps` in this package records that semantics verbatim). */
286
+ ultracode?: boolean;
287
+ }
288
+ export declare const SEAT_TURN_SETTINGS_KEYS: readonly ["ultracode"];
261
289
  export interface SendMessageRequest {
262
290
  sessionId: string;
263
291
  text: string;
@@ -270,6 +298,23 @@ export interface SendMessageRequest {
270
298
  * Bytes never ride this call: they went up once through the dedicated verb and the engine
271
299
  * materializes them into the run's `attachments/` dir. */
272
300
  attachmentIds?: string[];
301
+ /** Per-turn `/effort` dial pick → `TaskRequest.reasoningEffort`. Omit ⇒ the engine's own default.
302
+ * Closed set (`SEAT_REASONING_EFFORTS`) — gate it at the host's door, not at the wire.
303
+ *
304
+ * 🔴 Why this position exists (web 收编第一批, 2026-07-29): it did NOT, and the absence was
305
+ * STRUCTURAL — the seat lane's only payload is this closed-set interface, so the composer's effort
306
+ * dial had nowhere to put the user's pick and the web client honestly disabled the control on the
307
+ * desktop seat lane. "The control is missing" was the visible symptom; the missing wire position
308
+ * was the cause. */
309
+ reasoningEffort?: ReasoningEffort;
310
+ /** Keep this turn's background processes alive past the turn boundary → `TaskRequest.
311
+ * retainBackgroundProcesses`. Same structural-absence story as `reasoningEffort` above; the
312
+ * shell's lane defaults it ON (2026-07-26 flip), so a seat that cannot send it is not "defaulting
313
+ * to the same thing" — it is letting the ENGINE's default decide, which is a different decision. */
314
+ retainBackgroundProcesses?: boolean;
315
+ /** Per-turn settings sub-object → `TaskRequest.settings`. Closed shape (`SeatTurnSettings`);
316
+ * today's only member is the `ultracode` preset boolean. */
317
+ settings?: SeatTurnSettings;
273
318
  }
274
319
  /** `uploadAttachment` receipt — the SDK's `AttachmentInfo` verbatim (server POST /v1/attachments 201).
275
320
  * `name` is the SERVER's sanitized basename, not the local filename: it is the name the engine
@@ -436,6 +481,6 @@ export declare const SEAT_EVENT_METHOD_NAMES: readonly ["onEvent", "onToolPermis
436
481
  export declare const LOCAL_SESSION_EVENT_KEYS: readonly ["type", "sessionId", "message", "messages", "error", "errorCategory", "code", "request", "data", "sources", "permissionMode", "session", "userMessageUuid", "hasPreClearSession", "requestId", "outcome", "chrome"];
437
482
  export declare const TOOL_PERMISSION_REQUEST_KEYS: readonly ["requestId", "sessionId", "toolName", "toolCallId", "input", "message", "boundCallId", "boundInputHash", "createdAt"];
438
483
  export declare const LOCAL_SESSION_RECORD_KEYS: readonly ["sessionId", "engineSessionId", "model", "title", "isRunning", "createdAt", "lastActivityAt", "queuedMessages"];
439
- export declare const SEND_MESSAGE_REQUEST_KEYS: readonly ["sessionId", "text", "model", "userMessageUuid", "permissionMode", "attachmentIds"];
484
+ export declare const SEND_MESSAGE_REQUEST_KEYS: readonly ["sessionId", "text", "model", "userMessageUuid", "permissionMode", "attachmentIds", "reasoningEffort", "retainBackgroundProcesses", "settings"];
440
485
  export declare const TOOL_PERMISSION_DECISION_KEYS: readonly ["sessionId", "requestId", "decision", "answer", "updatedInput", "remember"];
441
486
  export declare const START_SESSION_OPTION_KEYS: readonly ["model", "title", "cwd", "excludeTools"];
@@ -10,8 +10,12 @@
10
10
  * 「接缝记账」里写下的第 1 条,它一直没被销账的原因就是没有任何机制会让它红。
11
11
  *
12
12
  * 落点为什么是本包:desktop 与 web 都已经依赖 `@sema-agent/client-core`(0.11.5),而本文件是
13
- * **纯类型 + 常量 + 纯谓词**,零 import、零 Node 内建 ⇒ 不动本包的可移植闭包(portability 门的
13
+ * **纯类型 + 常量 + 纯谓词**,零值级 import、零 Node 内建 ⇒ 不动本包的可移植闭包(portability 门的
14
14
  * `EXPECTED_PACKAGES_INDEX` 一个字不变)。
15
+ * ⚠️ 唯一一条 `import type`(`./effortWire.js` 的 `ReasoningEffort`)是**类型边**:portability 门
16
+ * 走值级传递闭包时按规则剥掉 type-only import(门里 `/^\s*type\b/` 那一跳),bundle 里一个字节都
17
+ * 不多。写成 import 而不是就地复刻那七档,是因为「座位闭集」与「wire 投影闭集」必须是**同一套词**
18
+ * ——复刻一份就等于埋一条只有真用户能发现的漂移(拨盘上的档在座位 lane 上静默到不了引擎)。
15
19
  *
16
20
  * ── 搬迁时按「真源为准」收敛的漂移(逐条,web 侧镜像 → 本文件)────────────────────────────
17
21
  * 🔴 D1 `LocalSessionEvent.outcome` —— web 镜像整位缺席 ⇒ `tool_permission_resolved` 只会清面,
@@ -124,6 +128,25 @@ export const PERMISSION_MODE_INTENTS = [
124
128
  /** Per-task attachment cap — the server's own limit (`attachmentIds` > 16 ⇒ 400). Gated here so the
125
129
  * seat gets a precise local error instead of a wire 400 halfway through a turn. */
126
130
  export const ATTACHMENT_IDS_PER_TASK_CAP = 16;
131
+ /** The per-turn `reasoningEffort` accept-set — core's ThinkingLevel tiers, re-exported from the
132
+ * package's own wire projection (`effortWire.ReasoningEffort`) rather than re-typed here.
133
+ *
134
+ * CLOSED for the same reason `PERMISSION_MODE_INTENTS` is: the word ORIGINATES in our own composer
135
+ * and travels OUT to a wire that 400s (fail-loud) on an unknown tier — so an unknown value is a
136
+ * local bug we want reported at the seat's door, not a future wire word to tolerate. `ultracode` is
137
+ * deliberately NOT a tier here: in CC it is a standalone `settings.ultracode` preset boolean that
138
+ * COEXISTS with `xhigh` (see `SeatTurnSettings`), and folding it into this axis is exactly how the
139
+ * orchestration axis gets eaten by the reasoning axis. */
140
+ export const SEAT_REASONING_EFFORTS = [
141
+ "off",
142
+ "minimal",
143
+ "low",
144
+ "medium",
145
+ "high",
146
+ "xhigh",
147
+ "max",
148
+ ];
149
+ export const SEAT_TURN_SETTINGS_KEYS = ["ultracode"];
127
150
  // ───────────────────────────── validators (CC dual-gate posture) ─────────────────────────────
128
151
  export function isLocalSessionRecord(s) {
129
152
  const e = s;
@@ -381,6 +404,11 @@ export const SEND_MESSAGE_REQUEST_KEYS = [
381
404
  "userMessageUuid",
382
405
  "permissionMode",
383
406
  "attachmentIds",
407
+ // 2026-07-29(web 收编第一批②):三位补齐。此前座位 lane **结构性**拿不到它们 —— 闭集就是
408
+ // 载体本身,不在集里 = 那个决定在这条 lane 上根本没有位置可放。
409
+ "reasoningEffort",
410
+ "retainBackgroundProcesses",
411
+ "settings",
384
412
  ];
385
413
  export const TOOL_PERMISSION_DECISION_KEYS = [
386
414
  "sessionId",
@@ -394,5 +422,6 @@ export const START_SESSION_OPTION_KEYS = ["model", "title", "cwd", "excludeTools
394
422
  const _seatContractPins = [
395
423
  true, true, true, true, true, true, true, true, true,
396
424
  true, true, true, true, true, true, true, true,
425
+ true, true,
397
426
  ];
398
427
  void _seatContractPins;
package/package.json CHANGED
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
1
1
  {
2
2
  "name": "@sema-agent/client-core",
3
- "version": "0.11.6",
3
+ "version": "0.11.7",
4
4
  "description": "Client-side session runtime shared by every sema human client (TUI / web / desktop): sema wire frames (AgentEvent) -> CC session vocabulary (SDKMessage) with dual-plane output (transcript/chrome), deterministic transcript ids, lane discipline as a type, and the notification/dedup ledgers. Every CC-skin shape is collected here so the wire itself stays neutral. Blackboard [1832] design axioms; [1651]/[1652]/[1653] signed seam design. Renamed from @sema-agent/wire-cc-adapter (0.1.x).",
5
5
  "license": "MIT",
6
6
  "type": "module",