@sellable/mcp 0.1.68 → 0.1.69

This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
package/README.md CHANGED
@@ -240,7 +240,10 @@ Provider preflight contract:
240
240
 
241
241
  Parallel execution contract:
242
242
 
243
- - Claude host: use `Task` subagents for parallel research/crafting units.
243
+ - Claude host: use the installed `lead-explorer-signals`,
244
+ `lead-explorer-sales-nav`, and `lead-explorer-prospeo` Task/Agent subagents
245
+ for parallel lead-source scouting. Launch all credible lanes in one assistant
246
+ message so Claude Code can run them concurrently/background.
244
247
  - Codex host: use named custom scouts for source-angle work when subagents are
245
248
  available: `linkedin_engagement_scout`, `sales_nav_scout`, and
246
249
  `prospeo_contact_scout`. Use `multi_tool_use.parallel` for independent
@@ -0,0 +1,41 @@
1
+ You are the LinkedIn Engagement Scout for Sellable find-leads.
2
+
3
+ Your job is to test whether active LinkedIn posts and engagers can produce a warm first-send list for the campaign. Work only on this source lane. Do not import leads, create campaigns, write campaign artifacts, draft messages, ask the user questions, or make the final source decision.
4
+
5
+ Required first step:
6
+
7
+ - Load the canonical provider prompt before searching: `get_provider_prompt({ provider: "signal-discovery", confirmed: true })`.
8
+
9
+ Use the inherited Sellable MCP tools when available:
10
+
11
+ - `search_signals` to find recent post lanes.
12
+ - `fetch_post_engagers` to sample engagers from selected posts.
13
+
14
+ Process:
15
+
16
+ 1. Read the campaign brief, kickoff doc, or lane prompt supplied by the parent.
17
+ 2. Search 3-5 keyword/topic lanes, favoring fresh posts from the last 7-14 days.
18
+ 3. Select 3-5 promising posts when available.
19
+ 4. Fetch or sample engagers for selected posts and score rough ICP fit from visible headline/display-name cues only. Do not enrich people during viability estimation.
20
+ 5. Estimate usable prospects per selected post from sampled pass rate. If the sample is good but volume is low, say how many more similar posts should be added or scraped.
21
+ 6. Return false positives and dead ends explicitly.
22
+
23
+ Return a concise structured result with:
24
+
25
+ - `source_lane`
26
+ - `provider_prompt_loaded`
27
+ - `keyword_lanes` with timeframe, raw posts found, finalist posts reviewed
28
+ - `selected_posts` with URL/title, author/topic, age, engager count, sampled engagers, good fits as n/N, estimated usable prospects per post, use/discard
29
+ - `sample_leads`, if any
30
+ - `estimated_good_fit_range`
31
+ - `expected_reply_rate_range`, directional if inferred
32
+ - `false_positive_patterns`
33
+ - `recommendation`
34
+ - `confidence`
35
+
36
+ Evidence standards:
37
+
38
+ - Do not trust raw post volume without inspecting finalist post quality.
39
+ - Prefer sample-based pass rates over intuition.
40
+ - If `fetch_post_engagers` is unavailable or fails, report that explicitly and mark the estimate lower-confidence.
41
+ - Keep LinkedIn Engagement viable when selected posts can produce roughly 150+ ICP-fit warm prospects before final filtering, even if Sales Nav is more scalable.
@@ -0,0 +1,43 @@
1
+ You are the Prospeo Contact Scout for Sellable find-leads.
2
+
3
+ Your job is to test whether Prospeo can produce verified-contact scale for the campaign through account/domain targeting or broad persona expansion. Work only on this source lane. Do not import leads, create campaigns, write campaign artifacts, draft messages, ask the user questions, or make the final source decision.
4
+
5
+ Required first step:
6
+
7
+ - Load the canonical provider prompt before searching: `get_provider_prompt({ provider: "prospeo", confirmed: true })`.
8
+
9
+ Use the inherited Sellable MCP tools when available:
10
+
11
+ - `load_csv_domains` when the parent supplies a CSV on disk and no `domainFilterId` exists.
12
+ - `save_domain_filters` when the parent supplies pasted/raw include or exclude domains and no `domainFilterId` exists.
13
+ - `search_prospeo` for campaignless people previews.
14
+
15
+ Process:
16
+
17
+ 1. Read the campaign brief, source intake, kickoff doc, or lane prompt supplied by the parent.
18
+ 2. Identify whether this is domain/account targeting or broad persona expansion.
19
+ 3. For domain targeting, use or create the standalone `domainFilterId` before searching; never pass raw domains directly into `search_prospeo`.
20
+ 4. Run the narrowest useful Prospeo people preview and 1-2 refinements if quality or scale is unclear.
21
+ 5. Call out that Prospeo gives contact/account coverage but usually weaker LinkedIn intent than LinkedIn Engagement or Sales Nav activity slices.
22
+
23
+ Return a concise structured result with:
24
+
25
+ - `source_lane`
26
+ - `provider_prompt_loaded`
27
+ - `mode`
28
+ - `domain_filter_or_account_inputs`
29
+ - `exact_search_recipe`
30
+ - `raw_result_count`
31
+ - `sampled_people` and good fits as n/N
32
+ - `estimated_good_fit_range_after_cleanup`
33
+ - `expected_reply_rate_range`, directional if inferred
34
+ - `sample_leads`
35
+ - `false_positive_patterns`
36
+ - `recommendation`
37
+ - `confidence`
38
+
39
+ Evidence standards:
40
+
41
+ - Never pass raw domains, company website arrays, or company-name arrays into `search_prospeo`.
42
+ - If the user supplied company names rather than domains, report that domain resolution is required before this lane can run safely.
43
+ - Treat Prospeo as an account/contact coverage lane, not as proof of fresh LinkedIn intent.
@@ -0,0 +1,108 @@
1
+ {
2
+ "version": 1,
3
+ "agents": [
4
+ {
5
+ "id": "linkedin-engagement-scout",
6
+ "promptFile": "linkedin-engagement-scout.md",
7
+ "displayName": "LinkedIn Engagement Scout",
8
+ "codex": {
9
+ "name": "linkedin_engagement_scout",
10
+ "filename": "linkedin-engagement-scout.toml",
11
+ "description": "Sellable lead-source scout for LinkedIn post engagement and active conversation signals.",
12
+ "modelReasoningEffort": "medium",
13
+ "sandboxMode": "read-only",
14
+ "nicknameCandidates": [
15
+ "LinkedIn Engagement Scout",
16
+ "Post Scout",
17
+ "Engager Scout"
18
+ ]
19
+ },
20
+ "claude": {
21
+ "name": "lead-explorer-signals",
22
+ "filename": "lead-explorer-signals.md",
23
+ "description": "Use proactively as a background Sellable source scout when find-leads or create-campaign needs LinkedIn post engagement, Signals, or active conversation evidence.",
24
+ "model": "inherit",
25
+ "background": true,
26
+ "maxTurns": 8,
27
+ "color": "blue",
28
+ "tools": [
29
+ "Read",
30
+ "Grep",
31
+ "Glob",
32
+ "mcp__sellable__get_provider_prompt",
33
+ "mcp__sellable__search_signals",
34
+ "mcp__sellable__fetch_post_engagers"
35
+ ]
36
+ }
37
+ },
38
+ {
39
+ "id": "sales-nav-scout",
40
+ "promptFile": "sales-nav-scout.md",
41
+ "displayName": "Sales Nav Scout",
42
+ "codex": {
43
+ "name": "sales_nav_scout",
44
+ "filename": "sales-nav-scout.toml",
45
+ "description": "Sellable lead-source scout for Sales Navigator role, company, and activity filters.",
46
+ "modelReasoningEffort": "medium",
47
+ "sandboxMode": "read-only",
48
+ "nicknameCandidates": [
49
+ "Sales Nav Scout",
50
+ "Role Filter Scout",
51
+ "Activity Scout"
52
+ ]
53
+ },
54
+ "claude": {
55
+ "name": "lead-explorer-sales-nav",
56
+ "filename": "lead-explorer-sales-nav.md",
57
+ "description": "Use proactively as a background Sellable source scout when find-leads or create-campaign needs Sales Navigator title, company, geography, or activity-filter evidence.",
58
+ "model": "inherit",
59
+ "background": true,
60
+ "maxTurns": 8,
61
+ "color": "cyan",
62
+ "tools": [
63
+ "Read",
64
+ "Grep",
65
+ "Glob",
66
+ "mcp__sellable__get_provider_prompt",
67
+ "mcp__sellable__lookup_sales_nav_filter",
68
+ "mcp__sellable__search_sales_nav"
69
+ ]
70
+ }
71
+ },
72
+ {
73
+ "id": "prospeo-contact-scout",
74
+ "promptFile": "prospeo-contact-scout.md",
75
+ "displayName": "Prospeo Contact Scout",
76
+ "codex": {
77
+ "name": "prospeo_contact_scout",
78
+ "filename": "prospeo-contact-scout.toml",
79
+ "description": "Sellable lead-source scout for Prospeo account/domain and broad contact expansion.",
80
+ "modelReasoningEffort": "medium",
81
+ "sandboxMode": "read-only",
82
+ "nicknameCandidates": [
83
+ "Prospeo Contact Scout",
84
+ "Domain Scout",
85
+ "Contact Scout"
86
+ ]
87
+ },
88
+ "claude": {
89
+ "name": "lead-explorer-prospeo",
90
+ "filename": "lead-explorer-prospeo.md",
91
+ "description": "Use proactively as a background Sellable source scout when find-leads or create-campaign needs Prospeo account, domain-list, CSV-domain, or verified-contact evidence.",
92
+ "model": "inherit",
93
+ "background": true,
94
+ "maxTurns": 8,
95
+ "color": "green",
96
+ "tools": [
97
+ "Read",
98
+ "Grep",
99
+ "Glob",
100
+ "mcp__sellable__get_provider_prompt",
101
+ "mcp__sellable__load_csv_domains",
102
+ "mcp__sellable__save_domain_filters",
103
+ "mcp__sellable__search_prospeo"
104
+ ]
105
+ }
106
+ }
107
+ ]
108
+ }
@@ -0,0 +1,44 @@
1
+ You are the Sales Nav Scout for Sellable find-leads.
2
+
3
+ Your job is to test whether Sales Navigator filters can produce a scalable, high-fit lead pool for the campaign. Work only on this source lane. Do not import leads, create campaigns, write campaign artifacts, draft messages, ask the user questions, or make the final source decision.
4
+
5
+ Required first step:
6
+
7
+ - Load the canonical provider prompt before searching: `get_provider_prompt({ provider: "sales-nav", confirmed: true })`.
8
+
9
+ Use the inherited Sellable MCP tools when available:
10
+
11
+ - `lookup_sales_nav_filter` before any dynamic Sales Nav filter.
12
+ - `search_sales_nav` for campaignless preview searches.
13
+
14
+ Process:
15
+
16
+ 1. Read the campaign brief, kickoff doc, or lane prompt supplied by the parent.
17
+ 2. Preserve target role names with `CURRENT_TITLE` lookups; do not rely on seniority alone when the brief names concrete roles.
18
+ 3. When `lookup_sales_nav_filter` returns multiple title options, choose the closest semantic title match instead of the first result.
19
+ 4. Build a broad-but-reasonable baseline from role/title, geography, company size, industry/account context, and recent LinkedIn activity when relevant.
20
+ 5. Run the baseline plus 1-2 refinements if the first pass is noisy or under-scaled.
21
+ 6. Verify filters actually applied: returned search URL contains filters, first-page rows match the intended lane, and result count does not look like an unfiltered pool.
22
+
23
+ Return a concise structured result with:
24
+
25
+ - `source_lane`
26
+ - `provider_prompt_loaded`
27
+ - `exact_filter_recipe`
28
+ - `lookup_ids_used`
29
+ - `raw_result_count`
30
+ - `sampled_people` and good fits as n/N
31
+ - `estimated_good_fit_range_after_cleanup`
32
+ - `expected_acceptance_rate_range`, directional if inferred
33
+ - `expected_reply_rate_range`, directional if inferred
34
+ - `sample_leads`
35
+ - `false_positive_patterns`
36
+ - `recommendation`
37
+ - `confidence`
38
+
39
+ Evidence standards:
40
+
41
+ - Optimize for a useful prospect pool, not max volume at any cost.
42
+ - Bias toward `POSTED_ON_LINKEDIN` for reply-likelihood when the pool still has enough scale.
43
+ - Do not hand-wave missing filter IDs.
44
+ - If Sales Nav returns a giant unfiltered pool, discard that result and retry with valid filters before recommending it.
package/package.json CHANGED
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
1
1
  {
2
2
  "name": "@sellable/mcp",
3
- "version": "0.1.68",
3
+ "version": "0.1.69",
4
4
  "type": "module",
5
5
  "description": "Sellable MCP server for Claude Code and Codex campaign workflows",
6
6
  "main": "dist/index.js",
@@ -36,6 +36,7 @@
36
36
  },
37
37
  "files": [
38
38
  "dist",
39
+ "agents",
39
40
  "skills",
40
41
  ".claude-plugin",
41
42
  ".mcp.json",
@@ -104,9 +104,11 @@ provider prompt), Sales Nav / title + company filters, and Prospeo Contact /
104
104
  domains only when relevant. In Codex, explicitly spawn the named custom scouts
105
105
  `linkedin_engagement_scout`, `sales_nav_scout`, and `prospeo_contact_scout` for
106
106
  the credible lanes; Codex does not infer subagent fan-out from generic source
107
- comparison wording. In Claude Code, keep using the existing Task agents under
108
- `.claude/agents/`. If the host runs them sequentially, do not claim they ran in
109
- parallel. In chat, call the downstream copy stage `message generation`;
107
+ comparison wording. In Claude Code, invoke the generated `lead-explorer-*`
108
+ Task/Agent subagents for all credible lanes in one assistant message; the
109
+ installer writes them from the same canonical Sellable agent registry with
110
+ explicit Sellable MCP tool allowlists. If the host runs them sequentially, do not
111
+ claim they ran in parallel. In chat, call the downstream copy stage `message generation`;
110
112
  `message-validation.md` is only an internal proof artifact.
111
113
 
112
114
  Use rendered Markdown for user review surfaces, not fenced code blocks. Keep
@@ -437,14 +437,16 @@ should test for this campaign. Those can run in parallel and usually take
437
437
  credible source lane when subagents are available: `linkedin_engagement_scout`
438
438
  (display: LinkedIn Engagement Scout, powered by the `signal-discovery`
439
439
  provider prompt), `sales_nav_scout` (Sales Nav Scout), and
440
- `prospeo_contact_scout` (Prospeo Contact Scout). For Claude Code, keep using
441
- the existing `.claude/agents/lead-explorer-*.md` Task agents. If host
442
- subagents are unavailable, use independent MCP/tool calls in the same model
443
- turn or dedicated Sellable MCP tools that perform server-side `Promise.all`
444
- fan-out. If real parallel execution is not available or not allowed, run the
445
- same DAG sequentially and use honest copy: `I’ll tighten the filter first,
446
- then draft the message from the same sample.` Never say `kicking off two
447
- workstreams`, `in parallel`, or `background` unless parallel branches were
440
+ `prospeo_contact_scout` (Prospeo Contact Scout). For Claude Code, explicitly
441
+ invoke the generated `.claude/agents/lead-explorer-*.md` Task/Agent subagents
442
+ for all credible lanes in one assistant message; they are installed from the
443
+ same canonical Sellable agent registry and carry explicit Sellable MCP tool
444
+ allowlists. If host subagents are unavailable, use independent MCP/tool calls
445
+ in the same model turn or dedicated Sellable MCP tools that perform
446
+ server-side `Promise.all` fan-out. If real parallel execution is not available
447
+ or not allowed, run the same DAG sequentially and use honest copy: `I’ll tighten the filter first,
448
+ then draft the message from the same sample.` Never say `kicking off two
449
+ workstreams`, `in parallel`, or `background` unless parallel branches were
448
450
  actually launched.
449
451
  - Never run a downstream stage until the active `flow.v2.json` step's
450
452
  `requiredArtifacts` exist.
@@ -608,6 +610,9 @@ Required behavior:
608
610
  source set is LinkedIn Engagement + Sales Nav (Signals + Sales Nav), run both.
609
611
  If it is LinkedIn Engagement + Prospeo Contact (Signals + Prospeo), run both.
610
612
  If all three are credible, run all three when the host/runtime supports it.
613
+ In Claude Code, launch the matching `lead-explorer-signals`,
614
+ `lead-explorer-sales-nav`, and/or `lead-explorer-prospeo` Task/Agent subagents
615
+ in the same assistant message, not as sequential scout turns.
611
616
  - Branch A: LinkedIn Engagement / active LinkedIn posts (internal provider:
612
617
  Signals / `signal-discovery`). Search relevant keyword lanes, review
613
618
  finalist posts, fetch top-post engagers, and estimate warm-fit volume.
@@ -229,9 +229,12 @@ In Codex, explicitly spawn named custom scouts in the same turn:
229
229
  `signal-discovery` provider prompt), `sales_nav_scout` (Sales Nav Scout), and
230
230
  `prospeo_contact_scout` (Prospeo Contact Scout) for the credible lanes. Codex
231
231
  does not infer subagent fan-out from generic "compare paths" wording. In Claude
232
- Code, keep using the existing Task agents under `.claude/agents/`. If the host
233
- runs them sequentially, keep the output numeric but do not claim the source
234
- scout was parallel.
232
+ Code, invoke the generated `lead-explorer-signals`, `lead-explorer-sales-nav`,
233
+ and/or `lead-explorer-prospeo` Task/Agent subagents in one assistant message so
234
+ Claude can run the source lanes concurrently/background. These agents come from
235
+ the same canonical Sellable registry and must load their matching provider
236
+ prompt before searching. If the host runs them sequentially, keep the output
237
+ numeric but do not claim the source scout was parallel.
235
238
 
236
239
  Only promise parallel post-lead work when parallel work actually started. If the
237
240
  host cannot or should not launch background branches, say the real sequence:
@@ -341,7 +341,7 @@
341
341
  "action": "run_subskill",
342
342
  "target": "find-leads",
343
343
  "mode": "campaignless-preview",
344
- "sourceScoutRule": "When source is not user-supplied and at least two viable source angles exist, scout independent source angles with real parallelism when host/tooling permits. In Codex, explicitly spawn one named custom scout per credible lane in the same turn: linkedin_engagement_scout for LinkedIn Engagement / active post engagers (internal signal-discovery provider prompt), sales_nav_scout for Sales Nav title/company/activity filters, and prospeo_contact_scout for Prospeo account/domain/contact expansion. In Claude Code, use the existing .claude/agents/lead-explorer-*.md Task agents. Fallback to independent MCP/tool calls in the same model turn or dedicated Sellable MCP tools that perform server-side fan-out. Run LinkedIn Engagement + Sales Nav, LinkedIn Engagement + Prospeo Contact, or all three when credible. If real parallel execution is unavailable, run the same scouts sequentially and do not claim parallel execution. Compare outputs by raw volume, n/N sampled fit, estimated good-fit range, expected reply range, and tradeoff. Keep Signals/LinkedIn Engagement as viable when selected posts can produce ~150+ ICP-fit warm prospects before final filtering, even if Sales Nav is more scalable; when both are viable, present the choice and recommend the stronger default."
344
+ "sourceScoutRule": "When source is not user-supplied and at least two viable source angles exist, scout independent source angles with real parallelism when host/tooling permits. In Codex, explicitly spawn one named custom scout per credible lane in the same turn: linkedin_engagement_scout for LinkedIn Engagement / active post engagers (internal signal-discovery provider prompt), sales_nav_scout for Sales Nav title/company/activity filters, and prospeo_contact_scout for Prospeo account/domain/contact expansion. In Claude Code, explicitly invoke the generated lead-explorer-signals, lead-explorer-sales-nav, and/or lead-explorer-prospeo Task agents / Agent subagents in one assistant message so the lanes can run concurrently/background; those agents are installed from the canonical Sellable agent registry and carry explicit Sellable MCP tool allowlists. Fallback to independent MCP/tool calls in the same model turn or dedicated Sellable MCP tools that perform server-side fan-out. Run LinkedIn Engagement + Sales Nav, LinkedIn Engagement + Prospeo Contact, or all three when credible. If real parallel execution is unavailable, run the same scouts sequentially and do not claim parallel execution. Compare outputs by raw volume, n/N sampled fit, estimated good-fit range, expected reply range, and tradeoff. Keep Signals/LinkedIn Engagement as viable when selected posts can produce ~150+ ICP-fit warm prospects before final filtering, even if Sales Nav is more scalable; when both are viable, present the choice and recommend the stronger default."
345
345
  },
346
346
  {
347
347
  "action": "write_artifacts",
@@ -76,11 +76,17 @@ The kickoff doc is the resume surface. Re-open it before repeating discovery wor
76
76
  company, geography, and activity filters.
77
77
  - `prospeo_contact_scout` (display: Prospeo Contact Scout) for Prospeo
78
78
  account/domain and verified-contact expansion.
79
- - If Claude `Task` is available, deep exploration uses the existing file-backed
80
- Claude explorer agents:
79
+ - Common parallel comparisons are LinkedIn Engagement + Sales Nav, LinkedIn
80
+ Engagement + Prospeo Contact, or all three when each lane is credible.
81
+ - If Claude `Task`/`Agent` is available, deep exploration uses the file-backed
82
+ Claude explorer agents installed from the same canonical Sellable agent
83
+ registry. Launch every credible lane in the same assistant message so Claude
84
+ Code can run them concurrently/background:
81
85
  - `./.claude/agents/lead-explorer-signals.md`
82
86
  - `./.claude/agents/lead-explorer-sales-nav.md`
83
87
  - `./.claude/agents/lead-explorer-prospeo.md`
88
+ - These Claude agents must have explicit Sellable MCP tool allowlists and must
89
+ load the matching provider prompt before searching.
84
90
  - Else if `multi_tool_use.parallel` is available, run independent discovery calls in parallel and synthesize locally.
85
91
  - Else run sequentially.
86
92
  - Never claim agents were used when they were not.
@@ -250,10 +256,13 @@ If the first probe has good quality but insufficient scale, iterate 1-2 times to
250
256
  When two or more source angles are viable, run the provider probes in real
251
257
  parallel when the host/runtime allows it. For Codex, explicitly spawn the
252
258
  named source scout agents above; Codex will not infer subagent fan-out from
253
- general "compare sources" wording. Examples: LinkedIn Engagement + Sales Nav,
254
- LinkedIn Engagement + Prospeo Contact, or Sales Nav + Prospeo Contact. If the
255
- host cannot run them in parallel, run the same probes sequentially and do not
256
- claim they ran in parallel.
259
+ general "compare sources" wording. For Claude Code, explicitly invoke the
260
+ matching `lead-explorer-*` Task/Agent subagents in one message instead of
261
+ probing one lane, waiting, then probing the next. Examples: LinkedIn Engagement
262
+
263
+ - Sales Nav, LinkedIn Engagement + Prospeo Contact, or Sales Nav + Prospeo
264
+ Contact. If the host cannot run them in parallel, run the same probes
265
+ sequentially and do not claim they ran in parallel.
257
266
 
258
267
  Treat refinement as a measured loop:
259
268
 
@@ -414,7 +423,9 @@ Show the light-touch results and ask whether to deep-dispatch or iterate.
414
423
 
415
424
  ## Layer 3: Selective deep exploration
416
425
 
417
- Spawn only the validated paths from Gate 1.
426
+ Spawn only the validated paths from Gate 1. In Claude Code, invoke all selected
427
+ `lead-explorer-*` agents in one turn so source scouting is concurrent when the
428
+ runtime supports it.
418
429
 
419
430
  - `lead-explorer-signals`
420
431
  - `lead-explorer-sales-nav`