@sellable/mcp 0.1.46 → 0.1.47
This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
package/package.json
CHANGED
|
@@ -34,8 +34,8 @@ The JSON flow is the source of truth for stage order, `requiredArtifacts`,
|
|
|
34
34
|
replace them.
|
|
35
35
|
|
|
36
36
|
Each stage writes its own artifact into the draft directory before the next
|
|
37
|
-
stage starts. `brief-v1.md` is
|
|
38
|
-
the
|
|
37
|
+
stage starts. `brief-v1.md` is an internal first-draft snapshot; `brief.md` is
|
|
38
|
+
the current customer-facing and downstream campaign thesis input.
|
|
39
39
|
|
|
40
40
|
After validation artifacts are complete, show the user a commit gate with 6
|
|
41
41
|
choices (approve / revise-brief / revise-leads / revise-rubric /
|
|
@@ -317,7 +317,7 @@ me`, `I’ll paste a different sender profile`, and `Other / custom`.
|
|
|
317
317
|
persistence in this preamble.
|
|
318
318
|
|
|
319
319
|
- Before asking for brief approval, render a slim approval brief in the chat and
|
|
320
|
-
keep the rich brief in `brief
|
|
320
|
+
keep the rich current brief in `brief.md`. Do not ask the user to
|
|
321
321
|
approve a one-paragraph direction, a risk note, or hidden artifact they cannot
|
|
322
322
|
inspect. The chat approval view should be skimmable in under 45 seconds; full
|
|
323
323
|
reasoning, source notes, and robustness stay in the artifacts. Include these
|
|
@@ -357,7 +357,7 @@ me`, `I’ll paste a different sender profile`, and `Other / custom`.
|
|
|
357
357
|
brief, include only:
|
|
358
358
|
|
|
359
359
|
```text
|
|
360
|
-
Open
|
|
360
|
+
Open artifact: [brief.md]
|
|
361
361
|
```
|
|
362
362
|
|
|
363
363
|
If clickable links cannot be created, show one compact fallback line:
|
|
@@ -377,8 +377,7 @@ me`, `I’ll paste a different sender profile`, and `Other / custom`.
|
|
|
377
377
|
user-facing choice should be approve/revise language, not "looks good".
|
|
378
378
|
Approval options should refer to what the user just read, e.g. `Approve this
|
|
379
379
|
brief`, `Revise target`, `Revise offer/proof`, and `Other / custom`.
|
|
380
|
-
Include `Open
|
|
381
|
-
approval question.
|
|
380
|
+
Include an `Open artifact:` link to `brief.md` before the approval question.
|
|
382
381
|
|
|
383
382
|
- After the brief is approved or auto-confirmed, show the next progress line:
|
|
384
383
|
`Cool. Now I'm going to find people who are both a good fit and likely to
|
|
@@ -412,8 +411,13 @@ should test for this campaign. Those can run in parallel and usually take
|
|
|
412
411
|
`npx`), call APIs, query databases, inspect prompt dumps, run git, or
|
|
413
412
|
synthesize artifact content. Use `Read`/`Write`/`Edit` for artifact files and
|
|
414
413
|
MCP tools for product actions.
|
|
415
|
-
- `brief-v1.md` is
|
|
416
|
-
|
|
414
|
+
- `brief-v1.md` is only an internal first-draft snapshot. Do not show it in the
|
|
415
|
+
normal user-facing approval view. `brief.md` is the stable downstream input,
|
|
416
|
+
current user-facing brief, and thesis source.
|
|
417
|
+
- On brief edits or revisions, update `brief.md` directly. Do not run another
|
|
418
|
+
long brief-generation pass just to create `brief-v2.md`. If version history is
|
|
419
|
+
ever needed, create it only as a cheap local copy after the edit; never spend
|
|
420
|
+
model/research time writing duplicate versions.
|
|
417
421
|
- `lead-review.md` and `lead-sample.json` are the required outputs of `find leads`.
|
|
418
422
|
- `lead-filter.md` is the primary output of `filter leads`.
|
|
419
423
|
- `rubric.json` is optional and secondary to `lead-filter.md`.
|
|
@@ -94,9 +94,10 @@ Every customer-facing update should answer one of these:
|
|
|
94
94
|
- What is protected until approval?
|
|
95
95
|
|
|
96
96
|
Before a brief approval, the user should see a slim approval brief in chat. The
|
|
97
|
-
rich brief
|
|
98
|
-
|
|
99
|
-
seconds and
|
|
97
|
+
rich current brief exists in `brief.md`; the chat view is the decision surface,
|
|
98
|
+
not the full working memo. `brief-v1.md` is an internal first-draft snapshot, not
|
|
99
|
+
part of the normal approval UI. It should be skimmable in under 45 seconds and
|
|
100
|
+
include:
|
|
100
101
|
|
|
101
102
|
- who we are targeting
|
|
102
103
|
- why they should care
|
|
@@ -206,26 +206,26 @@
|
|
|
206
206
|
"onEnter": [
|
|
207
207
|
{
|
|
208
208
|
"action": "show_brief_summary",
|
|
209
|
-
"artifact": "brief
|
|
209
|
+
"artifact": "brief.md"
|
|
210
210
|
},
|
|
211
211
|
{
|
|
212
212
|
"action": "render_brief_approval_checkpoint",
|
|
213
213
|
"requiredVisibleContent": [
|
|
214
214
|
"Campaign brief",
|
|
215
|
-
"
|
|
216
|
-
"
|
|
215
|
+
"Target",
|
|
216
|
+
"Core pain",
|
|
217
217
|
"Offer / CTA",
|
|
218
|
-
"Proof
|
|
219
|
-
"Lead
|
|
218
|
+
"Proof",
|
|
219
|
+
"Lead plan",
|
|
220
220
|
"Message angle",
|
|
221
|
-
"Risks
|
|
222
|
-
"
|
|
221
|
+
"Risks",
|
|
222
|
+
"After approval",
|
|
223
223
|
"approve this brief",
|
|
224
224
|
"revise the brief",
|
|
225
225
|
"then I will find good-fit leads"
|
|
226
226
|
],
|
|
227
|
-
"minimumVisibleBriefDetail": "
|
|
228
|
-
"requiredArtifactLinks": ["brief
|
|
227
|
+
"minimumVisibleBriefDetail": "slim_approval_brief_before_question",
|
|
228
|
+
"requiredArtifactLinks": ["brief.md"],
|
|
229
229
|
"artifactLinkTiming": "before_approval_question",
|
|
230
230
|
"avoidQuestionWhenOnlyUsefulAnswerIs": "looks good"
|
|
231
231
|
},
|