@sellable/mcp 0.1.24 → 0.1.25
This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
package/README.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -83,14 +83,14 @@ The token is provided when you generate it. Use `list_workspaces` +
|
|
|
83
83
|
For customer/package installs, use the public installer:
|
|
84
84
|
|
|
85
85
|
```bash
|
|
86
|
-
npx -y @sellable/install@0.1.
|
|
86
|
+
npx -y @sellable/install@0.1.25 --host codex --token skt_live_your_token_here --workspace-id your_workspace_id
|
|
87
87
|
```
|
|
88
88
|
|
|
89
89
|
If you already have `~/.sellable/config.json`, rerun/verify without rewriting
|
|
90
90
|
auth:
|
|
91
91
|
|
|
92
92
|
```bash
|
|
93
|
-
npx -y @sellable/install@0.1.
|
|
93
|
+
npx -y @sellable/install@0.1.25 --host codex
|
|
94
94
|
sellable --verify-only --host codex
|
|
95
95
|
```
|
|
96
96
|
|
package/package.json
CHANGED
|
@@ -929,7 +929,9 @@ evaluating Clay` when the only evidence is a post reaction), using forbidden
|
|
|
929
929
|
- `Fallback if missing:` is required for every token in the template. Each
|
|
930
930
|
fallback must say exactly what to do when the row lacks clean data: use a
|
|
931
931
|
safe segment-level phrase, omit the sentence/line, or route to
|
|
932
|
-
`revise-messaging` if omission would break the message.
|
|
932
|
+
`revise-messaging` if omission would break the message. It must include a
|
|
933
|
+
concrete example of the fallback behavior, such as `omit the noticed... line`,
|
|
934
|
+
`use "operators"`, or `use "your outbound workflow"`. Never leave a token
|
|
933
935
|
with "N/A", "unknown", empty braces, bracketed instructions, or a generic
|
|
934
936
|
fill that sounds robotic or creepy.
|
|
935
937
|
- rendered examples may only use token values that exist in `lead-sample.json`,
|
|
@@ -1131,8 +1133,8 @@ Do not:
|
|
|
1131
1133
|
- `Bad token fill:` with a realistic wrong fill for the current campaign
|
|
1132
1134
|
- `Why bad:` explaining the exact overclaim, unsupported token, weak signal,
|
|
1133
1135
|
casing mistake, or mail-merge phrasing that makes the bad fill unacceptable
|
|
1134
|
-
- `Fallback if missing:` with one fallback or omit
|
|
1135
|
-
template
|
|
1136
|
+
- `Fallback if missing:` with one concrete fallback or omit example for every
|
|
1137
|
+
token in the template
|
|
1136
1138
|
- `Token notes:` naming which tokens are safe to fill, which optional token line
|
|
1137
1139
|
should be omitted when absent, and whether the message uses standard sentence
|
|
1138
1140
|
case or casual lowercase static words
|
|
@@ -74,8 +74,9 @@ the tokens should and should not be filled.
|
|
|
74
74
|
|
|
75
75
|
Every token needs a fallback. If the row does not have clean data for a token,
|
|
76
76
|
the approval view should say whether to use a safe segment-level phrase, omit
|
|
77
|
-
the sentence, or revise the message.
|
|
78
|
-
or
|
|
77
|
+
the sentence, or revise the message. It should include the exact fallback
|
|
78
|
+
example, like `omit the noticed... line` or `use "operators"`. Missing data
|
|
79
|
+
should never produce robotic or creepy copy.
|
|
79
80
|
|
|
80
81
|
Approved token guidance is part of the campaign, not just the review. When a
|
|
81
82
|
campaign is minted, the approved brief should carry forward the token fill
|
|
@@ -649,6 +649,7 @@
|
|
|
649
649
|
"tokenized template plus filled sample prospect",
|
|
650
650
|
"good and bad token-fill examples",
|
|
651
651
|
"per-token fallback rules for missing row data",
|
|
652
|
+
"concrete fallback examples, not abstract fallback advice",
|
|
652
653
|
"complete rendered subject plus body examples",
|
|
653
654
|
"message-review hard-fail preflight",
|
|
654
655
|
"A + B + C subject quality",
|