@sellable/mcp 0.1.24 → 0.1.25

This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
package/README.md CHANGED
@@ -83,14 +83,14 @@ The token is provided when you generate it. Use `list_workspaces` +
83
83
  For customer/package installs, use the public installer:
84
84
 
85
85
  ```bash
86
- npx -y @sellable/install@0.1.24 --host codex --token skt_live_your_token_here --workspace-id your_workspace_id
86
+ npx -y @sellable/install@0.1.25 --host codex --token skt_live_your_token_here --workspace-id your_workspace_id
87
87
  ```
88
88
 
89
89
  If you already have `~/.sellable/config.json`, rerun/verify without rewriting
90
90
  auth:
91
91
 
92
92
  ```bash
93
- npx -y @sellable/install@0.1.24 --host codex
93
+ npx -y @sellable/install@0.1.25 --host codex
94
94
  sellable --verify-only --host codex
95
95
  ```
96
96
 
package/package.json CHANGED
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
1
1
  {
2
2
  "name": "@sellable/mcp",
3
- "version": "0.1.24",
3
+ "version": "0.1.25",
4
4
  "type": "module",
5
5
  "description": "Sellable MCP server for Claude Code and Codex campaign workflows",
6
6
  "main": "dist/index.js",
@@ -929,7 +929,9 @@ evaluating Clay` when the only evidence is a post reaction), using forbidden
929
929
  - `Fallback if missing:` is required for every token in the template. Each
930
930
  fallback must say exactly what to do when the row lacks clean data: use a
931
931
  safe segment-level phrase, omit the sentence/line, or route to
932
- `revise-messaging` if omission would break the message. Never leave a token
932
+ `revise-messaging` if omission would break the message. It must include a
933
+ concrete example of the fallback behavior, such as `omit the noticed... line`,
934
+ `use "operators"`, or `use "your outbound workflow"`. Never leave a token
933
935
  with "N/A", "unknown", empty braces, bracketed instructions, or a generic
934
936
  fill that sounds robotic or creepy.
935
937
  - rendered examples may only use token values that exist in `lead-sample.json`,
@@ -1131,8 +1133,8 @@ Do not:
1131
1133
  - `Bad token fill:` with a realistic wrong fill for the current campaign
1132
1134
  - `Why bad:` explaining the exact overclaim, unsupported token, weak signal,
1133
1135
  casing mistake, or mail-merge phrasing that makes the bad fill unacceptable
1134
- - `Fallback if missing:` with one fallback or omit rule for every token in the
1135
- template
1136
+ - `Fallback if missing:` with one concrete fallback or omit example for every
1137
+ token in the template
1136
1138
  - `Token notes:` naming which tokens are safe to fill, which optional token line
1137
1139
  should be omitted when absent, and whether the message uses standard sentence
1138
1140
  case or casual lowercase static words
@@ -74,8 +74,9 @@ the tokens should and should not be filled.
74
74
 
75
75
  Every token needs a fallback. If the row does not have clean data for a token,
76
76
  the approval view should say whether to use a safe segment-level phrase, omit
77
- the sentence, or revise the message. Missing data should never produce robotic
78
- or creepy copy.
77
+ the sentence, or revise the message. It should include the exact fallback
78
+ example, like `omit the noticed... line` or `use "operators"`. Missing data
79
+ should never produce robotic or creepy copy.
79
80
 
80
81
  Approved token guidance is part of the campaign, not just the review. When a
81
82
  campaign is minted, the approved brief should carry forward the token fill
@@ -649,6 +649,7 @@
649
649
  "tokenized template plus filled sample prospect",
650
650
  "good and bad token-fill examples",
651
651
  "per-token fallback rules for missing row data",
652
+ "concrete fallback examples, not abstract fallback advice",
652
653
  "complete rendered subject plus body examples",
653
654
  "message-review hard-fail preflight",
654
655
  "A + B + C subject quality",