@sellable/install 0.1.48 → 0.1.50
This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
package/package.json
CHANGED
|
@@ -70,9 +70,8 @@ instruction loading, file lookup, plugin cache versions, missing linked files,
|
|
|
70
70
|
or tool discovery. Start in product language:
|
|
71
71
|
|
|
72
72
|
```text
|
|
73
|
-
I’ll help you launch this as a Sellable campaign. First I’ll confirm
|
|
74
|
-
|
|
75
|
-
brief before anything is created.
|
|
73
|
+
I’ll help you launch this as a Sellable campaign. First I’ll confirm the sender
|
|
74
|
+
and company, then draft the campaign brief for your approval.
|
|
76
75
|
```
|
|
77
76
|
|
|
78
77
|
If a linked/local skill file is stale or missing, silently use the installed
|
|
@@ -134,11 +133,17 @@ approval:
|
|
|
134
133
|
installer enables this in Default mode with
|
|
135
134
|
`[features].default_mode_request_user_input = true`.
|
|
136
135
|
|
|
137
|
-
Use the structured question gate
|
|
138
|
-
approval gates. Never use it to collect open text
|
|
139
|
-
company domains, notes,
|
|
140
|
-
offer/CTA, proof, lead source,
|
|
141
|
-
|
|
136
|
+
Use the structured question gate for crisp identity confirmations, compact setup
|
|
137
|
+
intake, and approval gates. Never use it to collect raw open text like LinkedIn
|
|
138
|
+
URLs, company domains, pasted notes, long campaign ideas, or detailed feedback.
|
|
139
|
+
For buyer strategy, offer/CTA, proof, and lead source, use the structured gate
|
|
140
|
+
when it is exposed, but treat the visible choices as shortcuts, not a rigid
|
|
141
|
+
multiple-choice survey. Every setup question must allow a custom typed answer.
|
|
142
|
+
In Codex, `request_user_input` adds a freeform Other path; in Claude, include an
|
|
143
|
+
`Other / custom` option. Keep setup intake to two panels because Codex supports
|
|
144
|
+
at most three questions per panel: target/offer/proof first, lead source second.
|
|
145
|
+
Do not use checkbox/radio multi-select language like "pick one",
|
|
146
|
+
"multi-select", or "choose all that apply" for these setup questions.
|
|
142
147
|
|
|
143
148
|
Use "quick question panel" only when explaining a missing Codex/Claude setup
|
|
144
149
|
capability for approvals. Do not tell customers about `request_user_input`,
|
|
@@ -181,7 +186,9 @@ senders. If there is any likely connected sender, use
|
|
|
181
186
|
recent company, then ask a structured confirmation question:
|
|
182
187
|
|
|
183
188
|
```text
|
|
184
|
-
|
|
189
|
+
Workspace: {workspace}
|
|
190
|
+
|
|
191
|
+
I found {matched sender} connected here.
|
|
185
192
|
|
|
186
193
|
Is that you, and is this campaign for {company}?
|
|
187
194
|
```
|
|
@@ -212,11 +219,11 @@ with the structured question tool. Ask in normal chat for the user's LinkedIn
|
|
|
212
219
|
URL or the company they want to send on behalf of so you can research context:
|
|
213
220
|
|
|
214
221
|
```text
|
|
215
|
-
|
|
222
|
+
Workspace: {workspace}
|
|
216
223
|
|
|
217
|
-
First, paste your LinkedIn URL or the company website
|
|
218
|
-
|
|
219
|
-
|
|
224
|
+
First, paste your LinkedIn URL or the company website. I’ll use it to confirm
|
|
225
|
+
the sender and company, then we’ll choose the target, offer, proof, and lead
|
|
226
|
+
source.
|
|
220
227
|
```
|
|
221
228
|
|
|
222
229
|
If there is no strong sender match, do not show a structured choice that says
|
|
@@ -226,7 +233,7 @@ current or most recent company, and then confirm who we are sending from. The
|
|
|
226
233
|
customer-facing shape should be:
|
|
227
234
|
|
|
228
235
|
```text
|
|
229
|
-
|
|
236
|
+
Workspace: {workspace}
|
|
230
237
|
|
|
231
238
|
First, what’s your LinkedIn URL? If you’d rather start from the company, paste
|
|
232
239
|
the company website instead.
|
|
@@ -236,6 +243,8 @@ After the user pastes a URL/domain, do the lightweight lookup. For a LinkedIn pr
|
|
|
236
243
|
`mcp__sellable__fetch_linkedin_profile` and infer the user's current or most
|
|
237
244
|
recent company from the profile. For a company website, call
|
|
238
245
|
`mcp__sellable__fetch_company` when possible, otherwise one web lookup.
|
|
246
|
+
Before the lookup, use concise progress copy:
|
|
247
|
+
`Got it — I’ll look it up and confirm the sender + company.`
|
|
239
248
|
|
|
240
249
|
If `mcp__sellable__list_senders` did not already run, call it once after the
|
|
241
250
|
lookup to see whether the fetched user appears to match a connected sender. If
|
|
@@ -270,20 +279,18 @@ second context read so the four setup questions feel specific.
|
|
|
270
279
|
Before the identity gate, use this customer-facing shape:
|
|
271
280
|
|
|
272
281
|
```text
|
|
273
|
-
|
|
274
|
-
|
|
275
|
-
First I’ll check whether you already have a connected LinkedIn account here. If
|
|
276
|
-
I can’t confirm it, I’ll ask for your LinkedIn URL or company website and use
|
|
277
|
-
that to understand the company before we choose the target, offer, proof, and
|
|
278
|
-
lead source.
|
|
282
|
+
Workspace: {workspace}
|
|
279
283
|
|
|
280
|
-
|
|
284
|
+
First I’ll check for a connected LinkedIn sender. If I can’t confirm one, I’ll
|
|
285
|
+
ask for your LinkedIn URL or company website before we choose the target, offer,
|
|
286
|
+
proof, and lead source.
|
|
281
287
|
```
|
|
282
288
|
|
|
283
289
|
Do not silently ask approval questions as plain chat when `request_user_input` is
|
|
284
|
-
unavailable in an interactive session.
|
|
285
|
-
|
|
286
|
-
gate needs the
|
|
290
|
+
unavailable in an interactive session. Setup strategy questions should use the
|
|
291
|
+
quick question panel when available, but may fall back to normal chat if the host
|
|
292
|
+
does not expose structured setup input. Stop only when an approval gate needs the
|
|
293
|
+
quick question panel:
|
|
287
294
|
|
|
288
295
|
```text
|
|
289
296
|
I need Codex’s quick question panel for campaign approvals.
|