@sdelsad/commodity-desk-daily 1.0.5 → 1.0.7
This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
- package/covered.md +2 -1
- package/ep02.md +59 -54
- package/feed.xml +10 -10
- package/package.json +1 -1
- package/ep02.mp3 +0 -0
package/covered.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -2,4 +2,5 @@
|
|
|
2
2
|
|
|
3
3
|
Running log. Read before writing a new episode: avoid repeating material, and only make callbacks to episodes listed here.
|
|
4
4
|
|
|
5
|
-
- **Ep
|
|
5
|
+
- **Ep 1** (Mon) — *What a Commodity Merchant Actually Does*: What a merchant does: three transformations (space/time/form); risk absorber with a balance sheet; ABCD + COFCO + Viterra/Bunge; physical vs paper, paper is the hedge not the bet; flat price killed by hedge, profit lives in differentials; asset-heavy = options + information machines; 1851 Louis-Dreyfus Alsace-Basel origin story. Vocab: flat price, basis, book, the screen, origination, execution, ABCD. Example: 66,000 t Santos->Qingdao cargo, +80 in / +175 out, freight 70, costs 10 = 15c/bu ~ $5.50/t ~ $360k, direction-neutral.
|
|
6
|
+
- **Ep 2** (Tue) — *Flat Price vs Basis*: Flat price vs basis: cash = futures + basis; quoting 'November plus 80'; desk kills flat price via hedge; long the basis (physical + short futures) vs short the basis (sold unowned + long futures placeholder, crusher example); basis moved by freight, quality, congestion, urgency, farmer selling; basis risk as the chosen, analyzable risk. Vocab: flat price, cash price, differential, plus eighty, hedged position, long/short the basis, basis risk. Example: 66,000 t Santos cargo at Nov +80 — board - hedged to zero (~.4M each way) vs +10c basis = ~40k kept.
|
package/ep02.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -4,29 +4,30 @@
|
|
|
4
4
|
|
|
5
5
|
## Key takeaways
|
|
6
6
|
|
|
7
|
-
-
|
|
8
|
-
-
|
|
9
|
-
-
|
|
10
|
-
-
|
|
11
|
-
- The worked
|
|
12
|
-
-
|
|
7
|
+
- Every physical price is **two numbers added together**: cash = futures + basis. The futures leg is the world price — public, violent, seen by everyone at once. The basis is the **local price of reality**: freight, quality, congestion, urgency, farmer selling.
|
|
8
|
+
- Physical offers are quoted as a differential — "**November plus 80**" — not as a full price. Both sides assume the futures leg because both can hedge it in one click; the only number actually negotiated is *the plus*.
|
|
9
|
+
- A desk **kills the flat price within minutes** by selling futures against every physical purchase. What remains is a basis position — the risk the desk *chose* to keep.
|
|
10
|
+
- **Long the basis**: own physical, hedged with short futures — you win if the differential strengthens. **Short the basis**: sold physical you don't yet own, holding long futures as a placeholder — you win if the differential weakens before you buy.
|
|
11
|
+
- The worked cargo: 66,000 t of Brazilian beans (~2.4M bu) bought FOB Santos at November +80, hedged. Chicago falls $1: beans lose ~$2.4M, the short hedge makes ~$2.4M — **net zero**. The differential moves +80 → +90: 10¢ × 2.4M bu = **$240k of real, banked P&L**.
|
|
12
|
+
- Basis moves on **logistics, quality and urgency** — the things elevators, vessels and relationships see before any screen does. That's where physical information gets paid (Episode 1's "information machines").
|
|
13
|
+
- **Hedged does not mean safe.** The differential can move against you: 10¢ the wrong way on that cargo is a $240k loss, hedge or no hedge. That is *basis risk* — smaller than flat-price risk, local, analyzable. You don't escape risk in this business; you choose it.
|
|
13
14
|
|
|
14
15
|
## Vocabulary
|
|
15
16
|
|
|
16
17
|
| Term | Desk meaning |
|
|
17
18
|
|---|---|
|
|
18
|
-
| Flat price | The outright
|
|
19
|
-
| Cash price | The
|
|
20
|
-
| Basis / differential | The
|
|
21
|
-
| "
|
|
22
|
-
| Hedged position | Physical position with
|
|
23
|
-
| Long the basis | Own physical
|
|
24
|
-
| Short the basis | Sold physical
|
|
25
|
-
| Basis risk | The
|
|
19
|
+
| Flat price | The full outright price level (futures + basis together) |
|
|
20
|
+
| Cash price | The price of the real, physical commodity in a real place |
|
|
21
|
+
| Basis / differential | The premium or discount over a named futures month ("plus 80") |
|
|
22
|
+
| "November plus 80" | Quote convention: 80¢/bu over November futures |
|
|
23
|
+
| Hedged position | Physical position with the futures leg sold (or bought) against it |
|
|
24
|
+
| Long the basis | Own physical + short futures: profit if the differential strengthens |
|
|
25
|
+
| Short the basis | Sold physical not yet owned + long futures: profit if it weakens |
|
|
26
|
+
| Basis risk | The residual risk of the differential moving against a hedged position |
|
|
26
27
|
|
|
27
|
-
## Market pulse (Monday
|
|
28
|
+
## Market pulse (Monday Aug 10 close — eve of WASDE)
|
|
28
29
|
|
|
29
|
-
|
|
30
|
+
Grains are marking time ahead of **Wednesday's August WASDE**, the first with survey-based yields. The trade expects corn near **182.5 bpa** (−0.5 from July — still a ~15.95bn bu crop, second-largest ever) and soybeans near **52.9 bpa**. Monday was quiet: September beans slipped about a cent, meal eased, oil firmed; demand support came from China booking **238,000 t of US beans** and ~105,000 t of corn. Wheat is the live story: Russia's harvest is only **46% complete** — the slowest pace in five years — with Russian offers around **$223/t** and August exports running below the usual pace as Azov Sea shipping is disrupted by Ukrainian strikes; Matif firmed. Weather: rain reached the northern Corn Belt, the south stayed hot and dry, and France's maize crop is rated its **worst since 1980**.
|
|
30
31
|
|
|
31
32
|
---
|
|
32
33
|
|
|
@@ -34,17 +35,19 @@ Chicago spent Monday holding its breath ahead of **Wednesday's August WASDE**. D
|
|
|
34
35
|
|
|
35
36
|
### Block A — Today (Ep 2: flat price vs basis)
|
|
36
37
|
|
|
37
|
-
**A1 —
|
|
38
|
+
**A1 — Decompose the month.** A desk buys 30,000 t of corn (≈1.18M bu) from an interior elevator at "December futures minus 10" and sells December futures against it the same hour. A month later, December corn has rallied 50¢, and the desk sells the corn to an exporter at "December minus 2". Separate the flat-price P&L from the basis P&L, in ¢/bu and in dollars. Which number was the desk's actual trade, and what was the 50¢ rally to them?
|
|
38
39
|
|
|
39
|
-
**A2 — Two
|
|
40
|
+
**A2 — Which offer do you lift?** You buy soybeans for a crusher. Two firm offers for the same Santos October boat arrive at 9:00 with November futures at $11.80: Exporter X offers "November plus 85"; Exporter Y offers flat $12.70. By 11:00, November has dropped 25¢ and both offers are still on the table, unchanged. Which offer is cheaper at 9:00? At 11:00? Explain which seller is carrying flat-price risk while the offers sit, and what that tells you about why the physical market quotes in basis terms.
|
|
40
41
|
|
|
41
|
-
**A3 —
|
|
42
|
+
**A3 — Name the position.** (a) A merchant holds 40,000 t of unsold wheat in a port silo, fully hedged with short futures. (b) A miller has sold flour forward for Q4, owns no wheat, and holds long futures as a placeholder. Freight rates out of that port suddenly spike and export premiums jump 12¢. For each player: long or short the basis? Who gained, who lost, by how much per bushel — and why does the direction of the futures market not appear anywhere in your answer?
|
|
42
43
|
|
|
43
|
-
### Block B — Episode 1 (what a merchant does)
|
|
44
|
+
### Block B — Episode 1 (what a merchant actually does)
|
|
44
45
|
|
|
45
|
-
**B1 — The
|
|
46
|
+
**B1 — The recruiter's question.** "Commodity traders bet on prices going up, right?" Give the desk-level correction in three moves: what a merchant is actually paid for (name the three transformations with one concrete example each), what paper is for, and where the profit therefore lives.
|
|
46
47
|
|
|
47
|
-
**B2 —
|
|
48
|
+
**B2 — Rerun the cargo.** Episode 1's cargo: buy FOB Santos at futures +80, sell delivered Qingdao at futures +175, freight 70¢, execution 10¢, 66,000 t ≈ 2.4M bu. (a) Recompute the net margin in ¢/bu and dollars. (b) During the voyage, Chicago *rallies* 90¢ instead of falling. A colleague says the desk "left $2M on the table by hedging". What did the hedge actually cost or save, and why is the colleague's framing the wrong way to run a merchant book?
|
|
49
|
+
|
|
50
|
+
*(No J-3 block: three episodes back would be Episode −1.)*
|
|
48
51
|
|
|
49
52
|
---
|
|
50
53
|
|
|
@@ -56,66 +59,68 @@ Chicago spent Monday holding its breath ahead of **Wednesday's August WASDE**. D
|
|
|
56
59
|
|
|
57
60
|
## ▼ SOLUTIONS (spoilers) ▼
|
|
58
61
|
|
|
59
|
-
**
|
|
62
|
+
**S-A1.** Basis P&L: bought at −10, sold at −2 → the differential appreciated 8¢. On ~1.18M bu that is ≈ **$94k**. Flat-price P&L: zero by construction — the 50¢ rally lifted the physical corn by 50¢ (+$590k on the cargo) and cost the short futures exactly the same (−$590k). The desk's actual trade was *the basis*: buy the differential at −10, sell it at −2. The 50¢ rally was noise passing through a hedged book — a cash-flow event on margin (Episode 3's subject), not a P&L event. The trap: crediting the rally to the trader. A desk that "made money because corn rallied" wasn't hedged — and that's a different job.
|
|
60
63
|
|
|
61
|
-
**
|
|
64
|
+
**S-A2.** At 9:00, X works out to 11.80 + 0.85 = $12.65 against Y's flat $12.70 — **X is 5¢ cheaper**. At 11:00, X's offer has fallen with the board to 11.55 + 0.85 = $12.40, while Y is still $12.70 — **X is now 30¢ cheaper**. While the offers sit, Y is the one carrying flat-price risk: a flat offer is an implicit bet that the board won't fall before someone lifts it (in a falling market it becomes more and more expensive relative to replacement, and nobody lifts it; in a rallying market it gets lifted instantly — adverse selection both ways). X's exposure is only the basis component. That asymmetry is exactly why the physical market quotes "plus 85" and not $12.65: it lets an offer stay firm for hours while the world price does whatever it wants.
|
|
62
65
|
|
|
63
|
-
**
|
|
66
|
+
**S-A3.** (a) Physical + short futures = **long the basis**. (b) Sold product forward, long futures placeholder, still needs to buy physical = **short the basis**. Export premiums jump 12¢: the merchant's differential appreciated → **gains 12¢/bu** on the tonnage (≈1.47M bu on 40,000 t of wheat → ≈ $176k). The miller must now pay 12¢ more over futures to get real wheat → **loses 12¢/bu** on what remains to buy. Futures never enter the answer because both players hedged the flat price away on day one — what was left in both books was pure differential, and the differential is what moved. One event, two mirror-image P&Ls: that is basis as a market of its own.
|
|
64
67
|
|
|
65
|
-
**
|
|
68
|
+
**S-B1.** (1) Merchants are paid to *transform*, not predict: **space** (move Mato Grosso beans to a Shandong crusher — Santos → Qingdao), **time** (buy at harvest glut, store, sell into spring scarcity — paid via carry), **form** (crush beans into meal + oil; blend two off-spec wheats into one on-spec cargo). (2) Paper (futures/options) is the *hedge*: it cancels the price risk of physical positions rather than expressing views — the flat price is killed within minutes. (3) So profit lives in the **differentials** — the margins on each transformation, like Episode 1's 15¢/bu Santos→Qingdao cargo ≈ $360k, earned with zero opinion on direction.
|
|
66
69
|
|
|
67
|
-
**
|
|
70
|
+
**S-B2.** (a) Gross 175 − 80 = 95¢; net 95 − 70 − 10 = **15¢/bu** ≈ $5.50/t ≈ **$360k** on 2.4M bu. (b) The hedge "cost" ~$2.16M on the futures leg (90¢ × 2.4M bu) — and the physical beans *gained* the same ~$2.16M. Net effect on the book: zero; the $360k came through untouched. The colleague is comparing the hedged book to a naked long — but a naked long is a flat-price bet the desk never had a mandate (or edge) to run, and the same logic in a falling market means ruin: −90¢ unhedged is −$2.16M against a 360k margin. Merchant P&L must be repeatable and direction-neutral; "what if we hadn't hedged" is a casino counterfactual, not attribution. (Attribution done properly gets its own episode.)
|
|
68
71
|
|
|
69
72
|
---
|
|
70
73
|
|
|
71
74
|
## The episode, in writing
|
|
72
75
|
|
|
73
|
-
### The
|
|
76
|
+
### The number on the screen is not your price
|
|
74
77
|
|
|
75
|
-
|
|
78
|
+
On Monday, soybeans in Chicago drifted lower — and a desk sitting on 66,000 tonnes of soybeans didn't care. Not out of recklessness: the number on the screen simply is not the price of their beans, and never was. Understanding why is the mental model at the heart of the physical trading job.
|
|
76
79
|
|
|
77
|
-
|
|
80
|
+
Every physical price in this business is two numbers added together:
|
|
78
81
|
|
|
79
|
-
|
|
82
|
+
> **cash = futures + basis**
|
|
80
83
|
|
|
81
|
-
|
|
84
|
+
The futures leg is the world price. It carries the big story — crop sizes, weather, funds, war. It is violent, public, and everyone on earth sees it at the same instant. The basis is the **local price of reality**: it prices what the screen cannot see — freight, quality, port congestion, how badly a buyer needs beans in October rather than January, whether farmers are selling or sulking.
|
|
82
85
|
|
|
83
|
-
|
|
86
|
+
### "November plus 80"
|
|
84
87
|
|
|
85
|
-
|
|
88
|
+
Listen to how soybeans are actually offered in Santos. Nobody says "$12.60". They say **"November plus 80"** — 80 cents a bushel over the November CBOT contract. The full offer moves all day as Chicago moves; the *plus 80* barely moves at all. That differential is the **basis**.
|
|
86
89
|
|
|
87
|
-
|
|
90
|
+
A real conversation goes: *"Where are Santos beans for October?" — "Plus eighty."* Not a full price — just the basis. Both sides assume the futures leg, because both sides can hedge it in one click. The only number actually being negotiated is the plus.
|
|
88
91
|
|
|
89
|
-
|
|
92
|
+
### Killing the flat price
|
|
90
93
|
|
|
91
|
-
|
|
94
|
+
Here is what a desk does with that split: it kills the futures leg, within minutes. Buy a cargo of physical beans and, before the coffee goes cold, sell futures against it. The flat-price risk is handed to the screen, where thousands of speculators are happy to hold it.
|
|
92
95
|
|
|
93
|
-
|
|
96
|
+
What remains is the part the desk *chose* to keep — and it has a direction, like any trade:
|
|
94
97
|
|
|
95
|
-
|
|
98
|
+
- **Long the basis** — own physical, hedged with short futures. You want plus 80 to become plus 90: a bet that real beans, in that place, at that time, get scarcer relative to paper.
|
|
99
|
+
- **Short the basis** — you've sold a cargo you don't yet own and hold long futures as a placeholder. You want the differential to weaken before you buy the physical. A crusher who has sold meal forward but hasn't bought beans is short the basis every day of the week.
|
|
96
100
|
|
|
97
|
-
|
|
101
|
+
Notice what is missing from both phrases: any opinion about whether the market goes up.
|
|
98
102
|
|
|
99
|
-
|
|
103
|
+
### One cargo, two P&Ls
|
|
100
104
|
|
|
101
|
-
|
|
105
|
+
Take yesterday's cargo: 66,000 t of Brazilian beans — about **2.4 million bushels** — bought FOB Santos at November +80, hedged with short November futures. Over three weeks, Chicago falls a full dollar and the Santos differential moves from +80 to +90.
|
|
102
106
|
|
|
103
|
-
|
|
107
|
+
| Leg | Move | P&L |
|
|
108
|
+
|---|---|---|
|
|
109
|
+
| Physical beans | board −$1.00 | −$2.4M |
|
|
110
|
+
| Short futures hedge | board −$1.00 | +$2.4M |
|
|
111
|
+
| **Flat price, net** | | **$0** |
|
|
112
|
+
| Basis: +80 → +90 | +10¢ × 2.4M bu | **+$240k** |
|
|
104
113
|
|
|
105
|
-
|
|
106
|
-
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
107
|
-
| 1 — WASDE shock | −$1.00 | unchanged | −$2.4M | +$2.4M | ≈ $0 |
|
|
108
|
-
| 2 — Quiet screen | unchanged | +10¢ (80→90) | +$242k | 0 | **+$242k** |
|
|
109
|
-
| 3 — Real Monday | −$1.00 | +10¢ | −$2.4M +$242k | +$2.4M | **+$242k** |
|
|
114
|
+
A dollar of flat price came and went and the book barely noticed. A quiet ten-cent move in the differential was the entire profit — real money, banked. That is the anatomy of a physical trade.
|
|
110
115
|
|
|
111
|
-
|
|
116
|
+
Why did the basis move? Maybe freight tightened. Maybe Chinese crushers turned urgent. Maybe Brazilian farmers stopped selling because prices in reais looked ugly. All local, all physical, all invisible on the screen — and all things that Episode 1's "information machines" (elevators, vessels, relationships) see before any index prints. Nobody has an edge on the flat price, the most public number on earth. On the basis for beans, in Santos, for October? A desk absolutely can.
|
|
112
117
|
|
|
113
|
-
|
|
118
|
+
### Hedged does not mean safe
|
|
114
119
|
|
|
115
|
-
|
|
120
|
+
The differential can move against you: ten cents the wrong way on that cargo is a $240k loss, hedge or no hedge. That risk has a name — **basis risk** — and it is the risk the desk keeps *on purpose*. The point of the hedge is not to remove risk; it is to swap a huge risk you cannot analyze for a small one you can. You don't escape risk in this business. You choose it.
|
|
116
121
|
|
|
117
|
-
|
|
122
|
+
### Market pulse recap
|
|
118
123
|
|
|
119
|
-
|
|
124
|
+
See the pulse section above: WASDE Wednesday (corn ~182.5 bpa expected, beans ~52.9), China booking US beans and corn, Russia's slowest harvest pace in five years with Azov shipping disrupted, and France's worst maize rating since 1980.
|
|
120
125
|
|
|
121
|
-
*Tomorrow — Episode 3: Futures, desk edition.
|
|
126
|
+
*Tomorrow — Episode 3: Futures, desk edition. Not pricing theory — plumbing. Which contracts, which months, how many lots hedge a real cargo, and what a margin call does to your morning.*
|
package/feed.xml
CHANGED
|
@@ -20,19 +20,19 @@
|
|
|
20
20
|
</image>
|
|
21
21
|
<item>
|
|
22
22
|
<title>Ep 2 — Flat Price vs Basis</title>
|
|
23
|
-
<description>Why a physical desk kills the flat price within minutes, and what remains: the basis.
|
|
24
|
-
<enclosure url="https://
|
|
25
|
-
<guid>https://
|
|
23
|
+
<description>Why a physical desk kills the flat price within minutes, and what remains: the basis. A Santos cargo where a one-dollar board move nets to zero and a quiet ten-cent differential move is the entire profit.</description>
|
|
24
|
+
<enclosure url="https://storage.googleapis.com/podcast-audio-2647223968/commodity-desk-daily/ep02.mp3" length="6639596" type="audio/mpeg"/>
|
|
25
|
+
<guid>https://storage.googleapis.com/podcast-audio-2647223968/commodity-desk-daily/ep02.mp3</guid>
|
|
26
26
|
<pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2026 05:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
|
|
27
|
-
<itunes:duration>
|
|
27
|
+
<itunes:duration>553</itunes:duration>
|
|
28
28
|
</item>
|
|
29
29
|
<item>
|
|
30
|
-
<title>Ep 1 — What a Merchant Does</title>
|
|
31
|
-
<description>
|
|
32
|
-
<enclosure url="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/@sdelsad/commodity-desk-daily@1.0.
|
|
33
|
-
<guid>https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/@sdelsad/commodity-desk-daily@1.0.
|
|
34
|
-
<pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2026
|
|
35
|
-
<itunes:duration>
|
|
30
|
+
<title>Ep 1 — What a Commodity Merchant Actually Does</title>
|
|
31
|
+
<description>Merchants are not paid to predict prices. Space, time and form — the three transformations — and one Santos-to-Qingdao cargo that makes $360k with no opinion on price direction.</description>
|
|
32
|
+
<enclosure url="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/@sdelsad/commodity-desk-daily@1.0.6/ep01.mp3" length="7520877" type="audio/mpeg"/>
|
|
33
|
+
<guid>https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/@sdelsad/commodity-desk-daily@1.0.6/ep01.mp3</guid>
|
|
34
|
+
<pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2026 05:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
|
|
35
|
+
<itunes:duration>626</itunes:duration>
|
|
36
36
|
</item>
|
|
37
37
|
</channel>
|
|
38
38
|
</rss>
|
package/package.json
CHANGED
package/ep02.mp3
DELETED
|
Binary file
|