@sdelsad/commodity-desk-daily 1.0.48 → 1.0.50

package/ep15.md

@@ -1,196 +0,0 @@
-# Episode 15 — Cotton, Rice and Juice
-
-## Market pulse
-
-**Cotton gave back two and a half cents, and it was the biggest move on the board.**
-
-| Market | Contract | Settle | Change |
-|---|---|---|---|
-| Cotton No. 2 | Dec 26 | 86.45 ¢/lb | −248 pts |
-| Chicago wheat | Dec 26 | 754¼ ¢/bu | −19¾¢ |
-| Soybean oil | Oct 26 | 69.63 ¢/lb | −101 pts |
-| Corn | Dec 26 | 540¾ ¢/bu | −2¾¢ |
-| Rough rice | Nov 26 | $15.70 /cwt | −2½¢ |
-| Soybeans | Nov 26 | 1316¼ ¢/bu | +6¢ |
-| Soybean meal | Oct 26 | $348.60 /st | +$5.70 |
-
-Thursday was a soft session with one sharp exception. December cotton settled at 86.45, down 248 points — a point being one hundredth of a cent, so two and a half cents came off the board in a day. Chicago wheat lost nearly twenty cents, or 2.6 percent. Beans and meal were the only things higher.
-
-Cotton had climbed through August. Late in the month the December contract printed a fresh contract high near 89.45, on a US crop rated 38 percent good against 55 percent a year earlier, and on world ending stocks forecast at the lowest since 2011/12. Thursday's break undid roughly a third of that.
-
-**The policy read.** China's state reserve has been auctioning cotton into its own mills, and the auctions have cleared in full for 24 consecutive sessions — about 192,497 tonnes placed by 21 August. A reserve auction that sells out every day is not a price cap. It is a government discovering that domestic supply is short, and a domestic bid that eventually has to be met from outside. That is the transmission: reserve draw first, import demand second, world price third.
-
-```chart
-{"type":"bar","unit":"% change on the session","title":"Thursday's moves","caption":"Cotton and wheat carried the session. Everything else was noise around them, and only the bean complex held.","source":"CBOT and ICE settlements, Thursday 3 September 2026","x":["Cotton","Wheat","Bean oil","Corn","Rice","Beans","Meal"],"series":[{"name":"3 Sep","values":[-2.79,-2.55,-1.43,-0.51,-0.16,0.46,1.66]}]}
-```
-
-## Key takeaways
-
-- An **unfixed on-call sale is a buy order that has not been placed yet**, and it carries a deadline. Read the report by futures month, not by total: the total gives the mood, the months give the trade.
-- Mills fix into weakness, growers fix into strength. Whoever is closer to first notice day is the one who has to move.
-- A big net on-call number is a **spread signal, not a flat price signal**. In late August the pressure sat in March and July 2027, while December 2026 carried net latent *selling*.
-- **Notional is not size.** A rice lot and a corn lot are worth about the same money and are not remotely the same position.
-- In a thin market, size is measured in **days to liquidate**, not dollars.
-- Rice is thin because policy is its supply curve. Juice is thin because its supply is biology, and the trees are not coming back.
-
-## Vocabulary
-
-| Term | Meaning |
-|---|---|
-| **Cotton No. 2 (CT)** | The ICE cotton contract: 50,000 lb net weight, quoted in US cents per pound. One cent is $500 a lot, one point is $5 |
-| **bale** | The unit every cotton statistic uses: 480 lb net in the United States, so one CT lot is about 104 bales |
-| **on-call sale** | Cotton sold by a merchant to a mill at an agreed differential, with the futures leg left for the buyer to fix later |
-| **on-call purchase** | Cotton bought by a merchant from a grower, with the futures leg left for the seller to fix later |
-| **unfixed** | A price-to-be-fixed contract whose futures leg has not been set, so the exposure is still outright |
-| **cotton on-call report** | The weekly CFTC table of unfixed sales and purchases by futures month — a map of forced order flow |
-| **first notice day** | The first date a short may tender delivery, and the practical deadline for fixing or rolling an unfixed position |
-| **rough rice contract** | The CBOT rice future: 2,000 cwt of long grain rough rice, quoted in dollars per hundredweight |
-| **FCOJ-A** | The ICE orange juice contract: 15,000 lb of orange solids, quoted in US cents per pound |
-| **thin market** | A market where the price you get depends materially on the size you want, whatever a single lot is worth |
-| **market depth** | The quantity resting near the touch — what actually sets execution cost, as opposed to headline volume |
-| **days to liquidate** | Position divided by honest daily volume: the sizing measure that replaces a notional limit in a thin market |
-| **state reserve auction** | A government selling from its own stockpile into its domestic market, whose clearing rate reads as a tightness signal |
-| **citrus greening** | Huanglongbing, the bacterial disease that permanently cuts an infected orange tree's yield and cannot be cured |
-
-## Quiz
-
-**Q1.** A spinning mill has bought 620 lots of cotton on call against March 2027, at *March plus 780 points*. March futures were at 89.93 the day the contract was agreed. The mill takes the view that the market has run too far, waits, and ends up fixing the whole position at 93.40 shortly before first notice day.
-
-- What is the mill's final delivered cost in cents per pound, and what is the total invoice in dollars?
-- What did the decision to wait cost, against fixing on the day the contract was agreed?
-- The treasurer says: "we should simply have bought 620 March futures on day one." Would that have removed the exposure — and what would the mill have been left holding at fixation?
-
-**Q2.** The CFTC on-call report of 21 August 2026 showed December 2026 carrying 30,866 lots of unfixed sales against 32,711 lots of unfixed purchases. What does that month's balance imply about order flow still to come in December futures?
-
-**Q3.** Brazilian hydrous ethanol parity sat at 12.60 c/lb while the No. 11 screen was at 17.56. A fund manager argues that a further rally in raw sugar will pull more Brazilian sugar out of the mills. Why is that wrong?
-
-**Q4.** September arabica settled 36.10 cents over December on the first day of the spot contract's delivery notice period. What does an inverse that steep say about the position of the front-month shorts?
-
-**Q5.** *Conversion drill.* A Panamax of 44,000 t of soybeans is sold. How many bushels is that, and how many Chicago lots would hedge it?
-
-## SOLUTIONS (spoilers)
-
-**A1.** Work it in three steps, and keep the differential separate from the board throughout — that separation is the whole point of an on-call contract.
-
-*Size.* 620 lots × 50,000 lb = **31,000,000 lb**, which at 480 lb to the bale is about **64,583 bales**. Note the tick value that follows from it: one cent on 620 lots is 620 × $500 = **$310,000**.
-
-*The delivered cost.* The differential was agreed and never changes. Only the board moves.
-
-| | ¢/lb |
-|---|---|
-| March futures at fixation | 93.40 |
-| Differential | +7.80 |
-| **Delivered cost** | **101.20** |
-
-Invoice: 31,000,000 lb × $1.0120 = **$31,372,000**.
-
-*The cost of waiting.* Fixing on day one at 89.93 would have given 89.93 + 7.80 = 97.73 ¢/lb, and an invoice of 31,000,000 × $0.9773 = **$30,296,300**. The wait cost **$1,075,700** — which is simply the 3.47¢ rally times the $310,000-a-cent tick value. Per lot, $1,735.
-
-*The treasurer.* Yes, buying 620 March futures at 89.93 on day one would have removed the exposure exactly. That long would have gained 3.47¢ × 620 × $500 = **$1,075,700**, precisely offsetting the higher fixation. At fixation the mill sells the futures out and is left holding cotton at an effective delivered cost of 97.73 ¢/lb.
-
-**The trap the question is testing:** the mill was never "unhedged and waiting". An unfixed on-call purchase *is* a position — the mill is short the board, one for one, from the moment it takes the cotton. Doing nothing was not neutrality, it was a 620-lot short held by a company that does not consider itself a speculator. And the mill was 620 of the 19,481 lots of unfixed March sales in the market, about 3 percent of a queue of buyers all waiting for the same dip.
-
-**A2.** December carried **net latent selling**, not buying — 32,711 − 30,866 = **1,845 lots** more unfixed purchases than unfixed sales.
-
-The direction is the part people get backwards. An unfixed *sale* is a mill that has taken cotton and not priced it: its cost rises with the board, so it must eventually buy futures. That is latent buying. An unfixed *purchase* is a merchant who has bought from a grower with the grower holding the right to fix: that fixation is a sale. That is latent selling.
-
-So the December column says that the flow still to come in that contract leans, mildly, to the sell side — even though the market-wide total of 79,167 sales against 67,696 purchases leans to the buy side by 11,471 lots. The overhang was real, but it was not in December. It was in March (+12,519) and July 2027 (+12,651), with December 2027 running hard the other way (−18,583) because that is where growers have sold forward and not yet fixed. Reading the total and buying the front month gets the right thesis in the wrong contract.
-
-**A3.** Because the switch is already spent. Ethanol parity is the level at which a mill earns the same per unit of ATR from sugar as from ethanol. At 17.56 against a parity of 12.60, mills are already about five cents above the point where the decision flips, so every mill that *can* make sugar is already making the maximum its crystallisation capacity allows. The mix is set at the start of the season by hardware, not by the screen.
-
-Above parity, a rally therefore buys no extra Brazilian tonnes. It has only one remaining job, which is to ration demand. The price sensitivity of Brazilian supply lives *below* parity, not above it: it is a fall towards 12.60 that changes behaviour, by making ethanol the better home for the cane. A trader who models Brazilian supply as a smooth function of the sugar price will keep expecting an elasticity that has already been used up.
-
-**A4.** It says the front-month shorts cannot deliver. A 36.10-cent inverse is the market charging an enormous price for coffee now versus coffee in three months, on the first day of the notice period — which is precisely the moment a short has to choose between tendering certified coffee and buying its position back. When the certified float is small enough (226,242 bags, under half a day of world consumption), most shorts do not have the coffee, and everyone knows it. The inverse is the price of that fact.
-
-Two things follow. A carry market pays you to store and an inverse punishes you for it, so nobody with coffee is holding it back. And an inverse this steep is a statement about deliverable supply, not about world supply — the crop can be a record and the front month can still be squeezed, because only certified stock settles a contract.
-
-**A5.** A tonne of soybeans is 36.744 bushels (60 lb to the bushel).
-
-44,000 t × 36.744 = **1,616,736 bu**
-
-In your head: ×37 is ×40 minus ×3, so 1,760,000 − 132,000 ≈ 1,628,000 bu — close enough to quote.
-
-At 5,000 bu to a Chicago lot, 1,616,736 bu is **323 lots**. The trap is the corn factor: using 39.368 would give 1,732,192 bu and 346 lots, and you would be over-hedged by 23 lots.
-
-## The episode, in writing
-
-### The contract, and the unit under it
-
-ICE Cotton No. 2 is 50,000 lb of net weight, quoted in US cents per pound. One cent is $500 a lot. One point — a hundredth of a cent — is $5.
-
-Underneath it sits the **bale**, which is what every cotton statistic in the world uses: production, stocks, exports, mill use. A US bale is 480 lb net. So one futures lot is about 104 bales. The number is not elegant, and there is no reason for it beyond history: 480 lb is what a compressed bale weighed when the standard was written, and the trade never revisited it. The practical consequence is that a cotton desk converts between bales and pounds continuously, because the fundamentals arrive in one unit and the hedge is denominated in the other.
-
-### On call: the report nobody else gets
-
-A mill does not usually buy cotton at a price. It buys cotton **on call**: the differential is agreed today, the futures leg is fixed later, at a moment one side gets to choose. Structurally this is coffee's price-to-be-fixed, and the mechanics of fixation are the same.
-
-What cotton has that coffee does not is a **public tally**. Every week the CFTC publishes how much cotton has been sold on call and not yet fixed, and how much has been bought on call and not yet fixed, broken down by futures month. No other soft market publishes its unfixed book.
-
-The direction is where people go wrong, so it is worth stating slowly.
-
-| Position | Who holds it | What fixing requires | Latent flow |
-|---|---|---|---|
-| Unfixed on-call **sale** | A merchant has sold to a mill; the mill fixes | The mill's cost rises with the board, so it must buy futures | **Buying** |
-| Unfixed on-call **purchase** | A merchant has bought from a grower; the grower fixes | The grower's revenue rises with the board, so fixing is a sale | **Selling** |
-
-A mill sitting on unfixed purchases is **short the board without owning a single contract**. Its cost moves one for one with December or March, and the only way out is to buy — either as a hedge now, or as the act of fixation later. Fixation is not an administrative step. It is a purchase.
-
-Which means every unfixed on-call sale in that table is a buy order that has not been placed yet, and unlike a speculator's order it has a deadline attached: first notice day.
-
-Here is what it sounds like in late January:
-
-> **MILL:** What's March showing?
-> **MERCHANT:** Ninety twenty.
-> **MILL:** I'll wait.
-> **MERCHANT:** You've four hundred lots to fix and eleven sessions to first notice.
-> **MILL:** Then I'll wait ten of them.
-
-Nobody argued about the differential. It was agreed months ago. The entire negotiation was about a calendar.
-
-### Why it becomes a squeeze
-
-Take a mill holding 400 lots on call against March — 20 million pounds, roughly 41,700 bales. Every cent the board rises before it fixes costs it 400 × $500 = $200,000. Three cents is $600,000, on cotton already sitting in its own warehouse.
-
-That is a cost, not a squeeze. The squeeze is what happens when every mill reasons the same way at once.
-
-Each of them waits because it believes the market will come back. So the buying does not arrive smoothly across the quarter. It arrives compressed into the last sessions before the notice period, from buyers who by then have no view left — only a deadline. A rally that began with a dry Texas summer ends with people buying because the calendar told them to, and the last stretch of it has nothing to do with cotton fundamentals at all.
-
-### The month is the trade
-
-The 21 August report showed **79,167 lots of unfixed sales against 67,696 of unfixed purchases** — net about 11,471 lots of latent buying. The obvious conclusion is to be long cotton. The obvious conclusion gets the contract wrong.
-
-```chart
-{"type":"bar","unit":"lots (sales less purchases)","title":"Net unfixed on-call, by month","caption":"The overhang is not in December. It is in March and July 2027 — and December 2027 leans the other way, because that is where growers have sold forward and not yet priced.","source":"CFTC Cotton On-Call report, week ended 21 August 2026","x":["Dec 26","Mar 27","May 27","Jul 27","Dec 27"],"series":[{"name":"Net unfixed","values":[-1845,12519,7185,12651,-18583]}]}
-```
-
-December 2026 is net *short* of buying: 30,866 sales against 32,711 purchases. The pressure sits in March 2027 (+12,519 net to buy) and July 2027 (+12,651, against almost nothing on the other side). December 2027 runs hard the other way, at −18,583, because that is the month growers use to sell a crop forward before they are willing to price it.
-
-So the report is not a flat price signal. It is a **spread signal**. What it argues for is long March against December, not long cotton.
-
-And there is a layer beneath even that. The purchase side of the table is the grower. Growers fix into strength; mills fix into weakness. A rally therefore summons mill buying and grower selling simultaneously, and which one dominates is a question of who is nearer a deadline — not of who is more numerous. That is the read, and it changes week to week as the calendar advances.
-
-### Thin is not small
-
-Rice and orange juice teach the second lesson, and it starts by killing an intuition.
-
-```chart
-{"type":"bar","unit":"US$ notional per lot","title":"One lot, four markets","caption":"Within twenty thousand dollars of each other in notional — and orders of magnitude apart in depth. Contract size tells you almost nothing about how hard a position is to leave.","source":"Settlements of 3 September 2026 and exchange contract specifications","x":["Dec corn","Nov rice","Dec wheat","Dec cotton"],"series":[{"name":"Value per lot","values":[27038,31400,37713,43225]}]}
-```
-
-A rough rice lot is 2,000 cwt — 200,000 lb — and at $15.70 that is $31,400. A December corn lot at 540¾ is $27,038. Wheat is $37,713, cotton $43,225. By notional these are the same instrument.
-
-They are nothing like the same instrument, because **thin does not mean small. Thin means the price you get depends on how much you want.** In corn, 370 lots is invisible. In rough rice, 319 lots — almost identical money — is somebody's week.
-
-The practical consequence is that a notional risk limit is the wrong control in a thin market. The right measure is **days to liquidate**: take the position, divide by honest daily volume, and ask how many sessions it takes to get out without being the market yourself. If the answer is more than two or three, the desk does not have a position. It has a commitment.
-
-### Two different kinds of thin
-
-Rice and juice arrive at thinness from opposite directions, and the distinction matters because it tells you what kind of shock to expect.
-
-**Rice is thin because most of it never moves.** It is grown and eaten in the same countries; only around a tenth of world production crosses a border at all. And that traded tenth is dominated by governments — export duties, minimum export prices, licence regimes. One notification out of Delhi resets the world price faster than any monsoon.
-
-When policy is the supply curve, information does not accumulate. There is nothing, and then there is everything. That is why in rice the futures matter less than the announcements, and why a position that looked liquid on Friday can be untradeable on Monday morning.
-
-**Juice is thin for the opposite reason.** Its supply constraint is not policy but biology, and it is one-directional. Citrus greening has been working through São Paulo for two decades; around 40 percent of a recent Brazilian crop was affected. A tree that has it does not recover. So this is not a weather premium that builds ahead of a window and decays on the calendar — it is a slow, permanent reduction in the number of producing trees. FCOJ-A on ICE is 15,000 lb of orange solids. A market that small does not absorb a fund. It gets moved by one.
-
-Cotton, then, sits between the two. It is liquid enough to trade properly, and it publishes the one thing the thin markets never tell you: exactly how much forced buying is still to come, and in which month.

package/ep15.script.txt

@@ -1,78 +0,0 @@
-Seventy nine thousand lots of cotton have been sold, and nobody has agreed a price. ||| 0.5
-Not a price still to be negotiated. A price that one side gets to choose, later, whenever it likes. ||| 0.5
-This is Soft Commodity Trading, episode fifteen. Cotton, rice and juice, and the mechanism that turns a rally into a trap. ||| 0.8
-First, Thursday's tape. ||| 0.4
-Chicago wheat took the hit. December wheat settled at seven dollars fifty four and a quarter, down nineteen and three quarter cents. That is two and a half percent in a session. ||| 0.5
-December corn eased to five dollars forty and three quarters, off under three cents. November beans went the other way, up six cents to thirteen sixteen and a quarter, with October meal up five dollars seventy. ||| 0.5
-But the move of the day was in cotton. December cotton settled at eighty six cents forty five, down two hundred and forty eight points. A point is a hundredth of a cent, so that is two and a half cents off the board in one session. ||| 0.6
-Cotton had spent August climbing. Late in the month December printed a contract high near eighty nine and a half cents. The US crop was rated thirty eight percent good against fifty five a year ago, and world ending stocks are forecast at the lowest since twenty eleven twelve. ||| 0.5
-November rough rice barely moved. Fifteen dollars seventy a hundredweight, down two and a half cents. ||| 0.6
-The policy read is in China. The state reserve has been auctioning cotton, and those auctions sold out twenty four sessions in a row, placing roughly one hundred and ninety two thousand tonnes by the twenty first of August. ||| 0.5
-A reserve auction is a government selling its own stockpile into its own mills. When every lot clears, twenty four times running, the state is not capping the price. It is discovering that domestic supply is short. ||| 0.5
-That is a bid the rest of the world eventually has to meet, through imports. ||| 0.7
-Now the subject. Cotton, rice and juice. Three markets with almost nothing in common, except that in all three, liquidity is the risk. ||| 0.7
-Start with the contract. ICE Cotton Number Two. Fifty thousand pounds net weight, quoted in US cents per pound. ||| 0.4
-One cent on that contract is five hundred dollars. One point is five dollars. ||| 0.4
-The unit underneath it is the bale. A US bale is four hundred and eighty pounds net. So one lot is a hundred and four bales, near enough. ||| 0.4
-Why four hundred and eighty? Because that is what a compressed bale weighed when the standard was written, and the trade never changed it. Every cotton statistic you will read is in bales. The futures contract is in pounds. You convert all day. ||| 0.7
-Now the mechanism. ||| 0.4
-A mill does not usually buy cotton at a price. It buys cotton on call. ||| 0.5
-That is the same structure as coffee's price to be fixed. The differential is agreed. The futures leg is not. ||| 0.5
-But cotton does something coffee does not. Every week, the C F T C publishes the total. How much cotton has been sold on call and not yet fixed. How much has been bought on call and not yet fixed. ||| 0.6
-Read the direction carefully, because it is not obvious. ||| 0.4
-An unfixed on-call sale is a merchant's sale to a mill. The mill has taken the cotton. The mill has not set the price. ||| 0.5
-So the mill's cost rises, one for one, with the board. The mill is short futures without owning a single contract. ||| 0.5
-To close that, it has to buy. Either it hedges now, or it fixes later, and the fixing is itself a purchase. ||| 0.6
-So every unfixed on-call sale is a buy order that has not been placed yet, and it has a deadline. ||| 0.8
-Here is what that sounds like in late January. ||| 0.5
-MILL: What's March showing? ||| 0.25
-MERCHANT: Ninety twenty. ||| 0.25
-MILL: I'll wait. ||| 0.25
-MERCHANT: You've four hundred lots to fix and eleven sessions to first notice. ||| 0.25
-MILL: Then I'll wait ten of them. ||| 0.6
-Nobody argued about the differential. That was agreed months ago. The entire conversation was about a calendar. ||| 0.8
-Put numbers on it. ||| 0.4
-Say a mill holds four hundred lots on call against March. Four hundred lots is twenty million pounds. Call it forty one thousand bales. ||| 0.5
-Every cent the board goes up before it fixes costs it two hundred thousand dollars. Four hundred lots, five hundred dollars a cent. ||| 0.5
-Three cents of rally is six hundred thousand dollars, on cotton it has already taken into the warehouse. ||| 0.6
-And here is the part that makes it a squeeze rather than a cost. ||| 0.4
-The mill waits because it thinks the market will come back. Every mill waits for the same reason. ||| 0.5
-So the buying does not arrive gradually. It arrives compressed, into the last sessions before the notice period, from buyers who have no view left. Only a deadline. ||| 0.6
-A rally that started with a dry Texas summer finishes with people buying because the calendar told them to. ||| 0.8
-Now the mistake. ||| 0.4
-The headline in late August was seventy nine thousand one hundred and sixty seven lots of unfixed sales, against sixty seven thousand six hundred and ninety six lots of unfixed purchases. ||| 0.5
-Net, about eleven and a half thousand lots of latent buying. And the naive trade is to be long cotton. ||| 0.5
-That trade gets the month wrong. ||| 0.5
-Break it down. December had thirty thousand eight hundred and sixty six lots of sales against thirty two thousand seven hundred and eleven of purchases. December has more latent selling than buying. ||| 0.6
-The pressure sits further out. March, nineteen thousand against seven thousand. Twelve and a half thousand lots net to buy. July twenty twenty seven, nearly thirteen thousand net to buy, against almost nothing on the other side. ||| 0.6
-And December twenty twenty seven runs the other way. Eighteen and a half thousand lots of net latent selling, because that is where growers have sold forward and not yet fixed. ||| 0.6
-So this is not a flat price signal. It is a spread signal. ||| 0.5
-The unfixed sales say buy March against December. They do not say buy cotton. ||| 0.8
-One more layer. That other side, the on-call purchases, is the grower. A merchant buys from the farm on call, and the farm chooses when to fix. ||| 0.5
-Growers fix into strength. Mills fix into weakness. So a rally pulls in mill buying and grower selling at the same time. ||| 0.5
-Which one dominates depends on which one is closer to a deadline. That is the whole read. ||| 0.8
-Second concept. It is what cotton, rice and juice actually share. ||| 0.5
-Rice and orange juice are thin. And thin does not mean small. ||| 0.5
-Rough rice on the board is two thousand hundredweight. Two hundred thousand pounds. At fifteen dollars seventy, that is thirty one thousand four hundred dollars a lot. ||| 0.5
-A December corn lot at five dollars forty and three quarters is twenty seven thousand dollars. A cotton lot is forty three thousand. ||| 0.5
-Four contracts, all within twenty thousand dollars of each other. By notional, they are the same instrument. ||| 0.6
-They are not remotely the same instrument. ||| 0.5
-Because thin means something else. Thin means the price you get depends on how much you want. ||| 0.6
-In corn, three hundred and seventy lots is invisible. In rough rice, three hundred and nineteen lots is somebody's week. ||| 0.6
-So the sizing rule on a thin desk is not a notional limit. It is days to liquidate. ||| 0.5
-Take the position, divide by the honest daily volume, and ask how many sessions it takes to get out without being the market. If the answer is more than two or three, you are not positioned. You are committed. ||| 0.8
-Why are these markets thin? Two different reasons, and they are worth separating. ||| 0.5
-Rice is thin because most of it never moves. Rice is grown and eaten in the same countries. Only about a tenth of world production crosses a border at all. ||| 0.5
-And that traded tenth is dominated by governments. An export duty, a minimum export price, a licence regime. One notification out of Delhi resets the world price faster than any monsoon. ||| 0.6
-When policy is the supply curve, information does not arrive gradually. There is nothing, and then there is everything. Which is why the futures matter less than the announcements. ||| 0.8
-Juice is thin for the opposite reason. Its supply is not policy. It is biology, and it is shrinking. ||| 0.5
-Citrus greening has been working through São Paulo for two decades. Around forty percent of a recent Brazilian crop was affected by it. ||| 0.5
-A tree that has it does not recover. So this is not a weather premium that decays on the calendar. It is a slow, permanent reduction in the number of trees. ||| 0.6
-And F C O J on ICE is fifteen thousand pounds of orange solids. A market that small does not absorb a fund. It gets moved by one. ||| 0.8
-Three things to keep. ||| 0.5
-One. An unfixed on-call sale is a buy order with a deadline attached. Read the report by month, not by total. The total tells you the mood. The months tell you the trade. ||| 0.6
-Two. Mills fix into weakness, growers fix into strength, and whoever is closer to notice day wins. ||| 0.6
-Three. Notional is not size. In a thin market, size is measured in days to get out. ||| 0.8
-Next time, spreads. Calendar, inter-commodity and inter-exchange. The market's own thermometer, and why it is more honest than flat price. ||| 0.5
-Four questions in the notes, and a conversion drill. The first one is a full on-call problem. Take your time with it. ||| 0.5
-This has been Soft Commodity Trading. ||| 0.8