@sdelsad/commodity-desk-daily 1.0.18 → 1.0.19

package/covered.md

@@ -7,3 +7,4 @@ Running log. Read before writing a new episode: avoid repeating material, and on
 - **Ep 3** (Wed) — *Futures Plumbing and the Shape of the Curve*: Futures plumbing: tickers (ZW ZC ZS ZM ZL, KC SB CT), liquid months, front month, rolling executed as a calendar spread (Sep-Dec fifteen Dec over dialogue), initial vs variation margin, hedge converts price risk into liquidity risk with 2022 European wheat margin-call case; curve as information: carry/contango vs inverse/backwardation, full carry ceiling and cash-and-carry arb, percent of full carry as message, store-or-sell worked example (wheat 6.30, storage 5c, interest 3c, 24c full carry vs 15c spread, elevator vs own-bin answers), inverse as scream punishing storage twice. Vocab: ticker, front month, roll, calendar spread, Dec over, carry market, inverse, full carry, initial margin, variation margin, limit move. Pulse: WASDE print day — trade avg 182.5 corn yield vs USDA 183, range 180-185, first survey-based state-by-state report, trade-the-surprise framing; Tue closes Dec corn 4.6050 (-1.25), Nov beans 11.6875 (-10.75, 5-wk low), Chi Sep wheat 6.3025 (-10.25), KC 6.99, Matif Sep -5.25 EUR; wheat fell on rumours of Russia-Ukraine safe-passage talks in Turkey — priced the un-trapping mechanism (capacity reopens, world price down, origin basis up, freight/war-risk premiums compress); Ukraine 26/27 export forecast cut to 38-40 Mt
 - **Ep 4** (Thu) — *The Physical Chain, End to End*: Incoterms as risk allocation (FOB/CFR/CIF, risk passes at loading, cost vs risk separate, who charters/insures); execution clock laycan-nomination-NOR-laytime-demurrage/despatch; worked example 60kt FOB Santos beans at ~434 USD/t = 26M cargo, 3 days over at 24k/day = 72k vs 660k margin (11%), interest 4.3k/day; statement of facts and cascading demurrage claims; laycan miss = cancellation into a 40c rally; documents: draft survey, certificate final at load, bill of lading as title, backdating = fraud; execution desk as profit centre; OPS/TRADER dialogue on NOR and turn time. Vocab: Incoterms, CFR, CIF, charter party, nomination, NOR, laytime, weather working day, despatch, statement of facts, draft survey, bill of lading, cancelling date. Pulse: WASDE aftermath - corn yield cut to 180.7 (trade 182.5, prior 183), new-crop ending stocks 1.653bn vs 1.79 July, Dec corn +20.25c to 4.8075 two-week high; beans production +44M above July yet Nov +14.5c to 11.8325 on crush +30M (trade whole sheet, not one row); Chi wheat +22.5c to 6.5275, KC +21.5c to 7.2075; GEO escalation: Tue talks rumour died overnight, Ukraine struck Novorossiysk idling Demetra (8.5Mt) + NKHP (7.1Mt) grain terminals ~15.5Mt/yr, Russian Aug exports est 3.0-3.4Mt, Turkey two-corridor proposal, vessels-on-demurrage-clock bridge into lesson
 - **Ep 5** (Fri) — *Wheat: The Map and the Screens*: Wheat classes and specs (SRW ~10 Chicago, HRW 11-12.5 KC, HRS 13.5+ Minneapolis, durum, Black Sea milling 11.5-12.5); protein, test weight and falling number as the real price, low falling number demotes milling to feed at ~40 USD/t. Four exchanges for one grain: Chicago and KC 5000 bu in c/bu, Minneapolis HRS, Matif EU milling 50 t lots in EUR/t delivered Rouen-Dunkirk; tick symmetry 12.50 dollars vs 12.50 euros; 60kt = 440 Chicago lots vs 1200 Matif lots. KC over Chicago 68c/bu = 26 USD/t as the protein spread and an export-bid signal. Black Sea has no futures - daily price assessments, why an assessment cannot be bought sold or hedged. Cross-hedge worked example: 60kt Russian 12.5 FOB at 224 hedged with 1200 Matif lots, Europe +10 EUR/t = -692k against physical +4 USD/t = +240k, net -452k = 7.5 USD/t slippage; cross-hedge protects against the world moving not your own market; correlation highest on quiet days; EUR/USD exposure created by the hedge itself (~13-14m EUR). MILL/SELLER dialogue on protein, falling number, test weight and the 9-dollar spec spread. Pulse: Thu 13 Aug give-back - Dec corn 4.7775 -0.6 percent, Nov beans 11.8175 flat, Chi Sep wheat 6.5125 -0.2 percent, KC Sep 7.2075 Wed settle; China bought new-crop US beans three days running totalling 505,000 t; GEO escalation - Russia struck Izmail on the Danube, Ukraine's fallback after deepwater loadings ~zero since 22 July, Ukrainian early-Aug shipments -76 percent y/y, wheat export forecast 8.3 Mt, USDA cut Russia+Ukraine exports 2.5 Mt, yet Chicago finished the week unchanged because US sales were only 255,900 t (-14 percent w/w) and the US share of world trade was cut to 9.9 from 10.9 percent - flow substitution needs a buyer who actually switches origin, and they call France, Argentina and Australia.
+- **Ep 6** (Mon) — *Corn, Crop Calendars and Weather Risk*: Corn as a demand story (feed ~2/5, ethanol grind and its margin switch, exports 3.275bn bu, stepped demand curve); corn-wheat feed substitution priced both ways - Dec corn 477.5 = 188 USD/t vs Dec SRW 679 = 249.5 USD/t, 4 percent feeding credit gives a 195 USD/t switch level, 54.50 USD/t gap = 148 c/bu, wheat would need 531; 654k a month on a 20kt mill at 60 percent inclusion; reverse ceiling corn at 240 USD/t = 609 c/bu; BROKER/FEEDER dialogue quoting flat-to-corn rather than a wheat price. Crop calendar table US/Ukraine/Brazil full-season/safrinha/Argentina, US and Ukraine share a hemisphere so not diversified, safrinha is 3/4 of Brazilian corn and its risk is the soybean harvest date in front of it (wet October to May pollination in the dry season). Anatomy of a weather premium: price of a distribution vs trend yield, builds 10-14 days before the window, decays on the calendar not the forecast; Aug WASDE case - yield cut 183 to 180.7 removed 204m bu on 88.6m harvested acres but 2.8m acres found lifted production to 16.013bn, second largest ever; planted vs harvested acres as two denominators, ~8m acres never cut for grain. Pulse: Fri 14 Aug closes higher across the board with wheat up 4 percent on the week (Sep corn 459 +11, Sep beans 1177.75 +11.75, Sep meal 310.20, Sep oil 69.44, Sep Chi wheat 674.75 +22, Dec SRW 679, Dec KC 747.25, Dec corn 477.5, Matif spot 228.25 EUR); GEO escalation - all three Novorossiysk grain terminals suspended by Ukrainian drone strikes, Russian August loadings ~2.5 Mt = under half the five-year pace and weakest August since 2016/17, Ukraine MTD 201.7 kt -76 percent y/y, deepwater corridor shut since 22 July, Russia rejected partial ceasefire for civilian shipping - flow substitution moved from threat to actual buying, which is why this week the price moved and last week it did not

package/ep06.md

@@ -0,0 +1,218 @@
+# Market pulse
+
+**Wheat ran away with the week, and corn could not keep up.**
+
+| Commodity | Contract | Price | Change |
+|---|---|---|---|
+| Corn | Sep (CBOT) | 459 c/bu | +11¢ |
+| Corn | Dec (CBOT) | 477½ c/bu | +5½¢ |
+| Soybeans | Sep (CBOT) | 1177¾ c/bu | +11¾¢ |
+| Soybean meal | Sep (CBOT) | $310.20/short ton | +$2.80 |
+| Soybean oil | Sep (CBOT) | 69.44 c/lb | +65 pts |
+| Wheat SRW | Sep (CBOT) | 674¾ c/bu | +22¢ |
+| Wheat SRW | Dec (CBOT) | 679 c/bu | +10¾¢ |
+| Wheat HRW | Dec (KC) | 747¼ c/bu | +12½¢ |
+| Milling wheat | Spot (Matif) | €228.25/t | near July peak |
+
+Friday closed higher across the board, but the week belonged to wheat: more than four percent, the best week since mid-July. Corn added five and a half cents in December and no more.
+
+The reason is a supply story that finally found a buyer. Ukrainian drone strikes suspended operations at all three grain terminals at Novorossiysk, Russia's main Black Sea outlet. Russian August loadings are tracking near 2.5 million tonnes, under half the five-year seasonal pace and the weakest August since 2016/17. Ukraine's own month-to-date shipments are 201,700 t, down 76% year on year, with the deepwater corridor effectively shut since 22 July. Russia rejected a proposed partial ceasefire covering civilian shipping.
+
+The transmission is flow substitution, and it is one step further along than last week. Ten days ago both exporters were constrained and Chicago still finished unchanged, because no importer had actually moved its business. This week the buying started to appear elsewhere, and the price moved with it. Constraint alone does not lift a market. A buyer changing origin does.
+
+Corn's lag is not indifference. Corn demand is switchable in a way that milling wheat demand is not, and that is today's subject.
+
+```chart
+{"type":"line","mode":"index","unit":"index, Tue 11 Aug = 100",
+ "title":"Wheat led, corn stalled after WASDE",
+ "x":["Tue 11","Wed 12","Thu 13","Fri 14"],
+ "series":[{"name":"Corn Dec (CBOT)","values":[460.50,480.75,477.75,477.50]},
+           {"name":"Wheat SRW Sep (CBOT)","values":[630.25,652.75,651.25,674.75]}],
+ "caption":"Both jumped on the 12 August WASDE. Only wheat kept going, on Black Sea supply; corn gave the report back and sat still.",
+ "source":"CBOT settlements, 11–14 August 2026, as reported in the daily market wraps."}
+```
+
+# Key takeaways
+
+- Corn is a demand story. Roughly two fifths of the US crop is feed and a large further slice is ethanol, and both of those buyers walk away at a price. Milling wheat demand does not.
+- Substitution runs in both directions. Corn is the floor under feed wheat, and feed wheat is the ceiling over corn.
+- A weather premium decays on the calendar, not on the forecast. Once pollination is over, no forecast changes the ear count.
+- Being right on the weather and wrong on the timing loses money — and being right on yield can still lose to acreage.
+- The safrinha is decided in October, in a soybean field, not in April in a corn field.
+
+# Vocabulary
+
+| Term | Meaning |
+|---|---|
+| **Safrinha** | Brazil's second corn crop, planted Feb–Mar into soybean stubble, about three quarters of Brazilian corn |
+| **Weather premium** | The gap between where a crop trades and where it would trade at trend yield, priced as a distribution rather than a forecast |
+| **Trend yield** | The yield a crop would produce on normal weather, the baseline a weather premium is measured against |
+| **Planted acres** | Area sown, the number that moves on farmer decisions and USDA area surveys |
+| **Harvested acres** | Area actually cut for grain, roughly 8 million acres below planted for US corn |
+| **Feed wheat** | Wheat sold on energy and protein rather than milling spec, priced against corn |
+| **Ration** | The formulated feed mix a mill grinds, in which each ingredient has an inclusion limit and a substitution price |
+| **Ethanol grind** | The rate at which ethanol plants consume corn, which slows when the plant margin turns negative |
+| **Distillers grains (DDGS)** | The protein co-product of ethanol production, sold back into feed |
+| **Abandonment** | Planted area never harvested for grain, from drought, flood or a switch to silage |
+
+# Quiz
+
+**Q1.** December corn settles at 477½ c/bu and December Chicago wheat at 679 c/bu. Convert both to dollars per tonne, then say how far wheat would have to fall, in cents per bushel, before a feed mill would begin swapping wheat for corn. Assume wheat earns a 4% feeding credit over corn.
+
+**Q2.** A trader is long December corn from mid-July on a drought forecast. The drought was real: USDA cuts the national yield from 183 to 180.7 bu/ac on 12 August. The trader is flat on the trade by 14 August. Explain, with numbers, how a correct yield call produced no money.
+
+**Q3.** It is late October. Rain has delayed soybean planting across Mato Grosso by roughly three weeks. Which corn contract does this argue for trading, in which direction, and what is the chain of causation? Name the month in which the damage, if it comes, actually happens.
+
+**Q4.** Ep 5 taught the cross-hedge. Today's mill is long 30,000 t of feed wheat bought flat to corn, and hedges it by selling Chicago corn futures rather than wheat futures. The Black Sea story then lifts Chicago wheat 30 c/bu while corn moves 5 c/bu. Where is the P&L, and was the hedge choice wrong?
+
+**Q5.** Ep 5 gave KC over Chicago at 68 c/bu, or about $26/t, as the protein spread. Today December KC is 747¼ and December Chicago 679, a spread of 68¼ c/bu. The spread has not moved while both markets rallied over 4%. What does an unchanged spread tell you about what kind of buying drove the week?
+
+**Q6.** Ep 3 taught that the curve pays for storage up to full carry. US corn harvest begins in September. If the December–March corn spread is trading at 60% of full carry today, what is the market telling a farmer with on-farm storage, and how would that message change if the Black Sea story pulled export demand forward into the fourth quarter?
+
+**Q7.** Ep 3 taught that a hedge converts price risk into liquidity risk. The mill in Q4 is short corn futures. Corn rallies 30 c/bu over two weeks on a late-season weather scare. Its physical wheat is worth more too. Why might the treasurer still be in trouble, and what is the number that matters?
+
+**Q8 — Conversion drill.** A Paraná safrinha forecast calls for an overnight low of 9 °C. On the same day a southern Plains station prints 113 °F. Convert each into the other scale, and say which of the two is the market-relevant number for a corn desk in August.
+
+# SOLUTIONS (spoilers)
+
+**A1.** Corn is 56 lb/bu, so a tonne is 39.368 bu; wheat is 60 lb/bu, so a tonne is 36.744 bu. Two different divisors — this is the trap.
+
+| | c/bu | bu/t | $/t |
+|---|---|---|---|
+| Corn Dec | 477.5 | 39.368 | 188.0 |
+| Wheat SRW Dec | 679.0 | 36.744 | 249.5 |
+
+With a 4% feeding credit, wheat's switching threshold is 188.0 × 1.04 ≈ $195/t. Wheat trades at $249.5/t, so the gap is $54.50/t. Converting back to the wheat bushel: 54.50 ÷ 36.744 = 148 c/bu. Chicago wheat would have to fall to roughly 531 c/bu before a feeder even looks. On a mill grinding 20,000 t/month at 60% corn — 12,000 t of corn — switching today would cost about $654,000 a month. Nobody switches. The point is the size of the distance: the feed floor is a real level, but it is a long way below a milling market in a supply scare.
+
+**A2.** The yield call was right and the production call was wrong, because yield is only one of the two terms.
+
+| Line | Value |
+|---|---|
+| July production | 16.000 bn bu |
+| Yield effect: −2.3 bu/ac × 88.6 m harvested ac | −204 m bu |
+| Area effect: acres found | +217 m bu |
+| August production | 16.013 bn bu |
+
+USDA lifted planted corn area to 96.73 m acres, part of about 2.8 m extra acres found across corn and beans. So a genuine 2.3 bu yield cut — the largest the trade expected — arrived alongside a production *increase*, and the second-largest crop on record. Dec corn added roughly 20 c on the print, gave most of it back over the following two sessions, and finished the week at 477½. The trap: a weather premium is a claim on the balance sheet, not on the yield line, and the balance sheet has an area term, a demand term and a carry-in term that can each pay for the yield.
+
+**A3.** Buy the contract that carries Brazilian second-crop supply — in Chicago terms the July contract, and on the Brazilian domestic curve the mid-year months. The instinct to trade the *near* corn on a Brazilian planting delay is the trap: nothing happens to supply for seven months.
+
+The causation runs: wet October delays soybean planting → beans harvest late, into late February → safrinha goes into the ground past its planting window → pollination slips from April into May → May is the start of the Brazilian dry season in the centre-west. So a three-week delay in October raises the probability of a pollination failure seven months later. The damage, if it comes, happens in **May**. The trade is to buy the corn contract that carries Brazilian second-crop supply — CBOT July, or the Brazilian domestic curve — while the market is still pricing a normal safrinha. The lesson underneath: the largest single risk to the world corn balance is set by a planting date in a different crop.
+
+**A4.** This is a cross-hedge and it behaved exactly as ep 5 warned. The mill bought physical feed wheat priced *flat to corn* — so its purchase price is contractually tied to corn — and hedged with corn futures. That part is internally consistent.
+
+| Leg | Move | P&L on 30,000 t |
+|---|---|---|
+| Physical wheat, priced flat to corn | +5 c/bu corn-equivalent | +$41,000 |
+| Short corn futures | +5 c/bu | −$41,000 |
+| Net | | ≈ 0 |
+
+(30,000 t of wheat ÷ 36.744 = 816,300 bu-equivalent; 5 c/bu ≈ $41,000.)
+
+The hedge was *not* wrong, because the exposure being hedged was corn — the contract said so. The mill did, however, forgo the 30 c/bu that outright wheat length would have made, which is not a hedging loss but the price of not having a view. Where it would go wrong is basis: if the mill's next purchase reprices against wheat rather than corn, the corn hedge stops matching the exposure and the 25 c/bu divergence between the two markets becomes real slippage — about $204,000 on this tonnage.
+
+**A5.** An unchanged KC–Chicago spread through a 4% rally says the buying was **not** quality-driven. A protein squeeze — a hard-wheat supply problem, a milling spec shortage — widens KC over Chicago, because it bids the protein and leaves the soft wheat behind. Here both classes rose together and the spread sat at roughly 68 c/bu.
+
+That is the signature of a *world balance sheet* move rather than a *quality* move: an export-capacity constraint at a competing origin lifts the whole US wheat complex, because the substitute for absent Black Sea tonnage is any exportable wheat, of any class. The desk reads it as flat-price risk, not spread risk, and hedges accordingly. If the spread had widened 20 c while both rallied, the story would have been protein, and the trade would have been in the spread, not the outright.
+
+**A6.** At 60% of full carry the market is paying most, but not all, of the cost of storage. Ep 3's rule: compare the spread to the full-carry ceiling and act on the gap.
+
+- **Farmer with on-farm storage**, whose marginal cost is interest and shrink rather than a commercial elevator tariff: 60% of full carry usually covers his real cost. Store, and sell the March against it — he is capturing a spread the market is paying him for.
+- **Farmer paying commercial storage** at the full tariff: 60% does not cover it. Sell at harvest, or sell the cash and buy a call if he wants the upside.
+
+If Black Sea disruption pulled export demand forward into Q4, the December contract would bid relative to March, the spread would compress toward zero or invert, and the message flips completely. An inverse tells the farmer the market wants the grain *now* and will not pay him to hold it. Holding through an inverse pays storage costs and loses the spread — punished twice, as ep 3 put it.
+
+**A7.** Because the hedge converted price risk into liquidity risk, and the two legs settle on different clocks. The short corn futures position takes variation margin in cash, daily, before the physical gain is realised in any invoice.
+
+Position size: 30,000 t ÷ 39.368 bu/t ≈ 762,000 bu of corn-equivalent, or about 152 contracts of 5,000 bu. A 30 c/bu adverse move on the short leg is 762,000 × $0.30 ≈ **$229,000** of variation margin, paid out in cash within days.
+
+The physical wheat is indeed worth more, but that value arrives when the ration is sold, or later. The number that matters is not the P&L — which is roughly flat — it is the peak cash drawdown against the committed credit line. This is the 2022 European wheat episode in miniature: solvent hedges, insolvent treasuries.
+
+**A8 — Conversion drill answer.** 9 °C → (9 × 9/5) + 32 = 16.2 + 32 = **48.2 °F**. 113 °F → (113 − 32) × 5/9 = 81 × 5/9 = **45 °C**.
+
+The market-relevant number in August is the 113 °F Plains print. The Paraná low is a Southern Hemisphere winter reading with no crop in the critical window — safrinha corn is already harvested by August and the new full-season crop is not yet planted. The Plains heat, by contrast, lands on late-filling row crops and on hard red winter wheat country's soil moisture going into autumn seeding. Same day, two temperatures, one of them tradeable.
+
+# Written edition
+
+## Corn is a demand story
+
+Corn is the largest crop on earth and almost none of it is eaten by people directly. Roughly two fifths of the US crop goes to feed. A large further slice goes to ethanol. Exports take about 3.275 billion bushels this marketing year. Food and industrial use is the smallest piece.
+
+That composition is the whole personality of the market. A miller who needs milling wheat needs milling wheat: the specification is the product, and there is no substitute at any price. A feeder needs neither corn nor wheat. A feeder needs energy and protein at the lowest cost per unit, subject to inclusion limits. To a nutritionist, corn and feed wheat are the same product. To a miller they are different products.
+
+Ethanol adds a second switch, and it is a margin rather than a preference. A plant buys corn and sells ethanol and distillers grains. When that margin goes negative the plant slows its grind, and a chunk of corn demand simply stops appearing at the bid. The demand curve for corn is not a smooth line. It has steps in it, and the steps are where the substitutes and the plant margins sit.
+
+## Pricing the switch
+
+Take Friday's settlements. The conversion is the first place people lose money, because corn and wheat do not share a divisor: corn is 56 lb to the bushel, so a tonne is 39.368 bushels; wheat is 60 lb, so a tonne is 36.744.
+
+| | c/bu | $/t |
+|---|---|---|
+| Corn, Dec | 477½ | 188.0 |
+| Wheat SRW, Dec | 679 | 249.5 |
+| Wheat HRW, Dec (KC) | 747¼ | 274.5 |
+| Feed-switch threshold for wheat | — | ~195 |
+
+Wheat carries a modest feeding credit against corn — more protein, comparable energy, offset by inclusion limits. Call it 4%. So wheat displaces corn at around $195/t. It is at $249.50. The gap is $54.50 a tonne.
+
+For a mill grinding 20,000 t a month at 60% corn inclusion, that is 12,000 t of corn, and switching to wheat would cost about $654,000 a month. The switch is not marginal. It is not close.
+
+Run it backwards and the same arithmetic gives the distance in bushel terms: $54.50/t ÷ 36.744 = 148 c/bu, so Chicago wheat would need to trade near 531 before a feeder picked up the phone. That number — the feed floor — is the reason wheat has a bottom in a bear market that has nothing to do with millers.
+
+```chart
+{"type":"bar","unit":"USD per tonne",
+ "title":"Wheat is far above its feed value",
+ "categories":["Corn Dec","Feed switch level","Wheat SRW Dec","Wheat HRW Dec"],
+ "series":[{"name":"USD/t","values":[188.0,195.0,249.5,274.5]}],
+ "caption":"A feeder switches from corn to wheat at about $195/t. Chicago wheat is $54 above that, so the substitution bid is nowhere near being triggered — wheat is trading as a milling market, not a feed market.",
+ "source":"CBOT and KC settlements, 14 August 2026, converted at 39.368 bu/t corn and 36.744 bu/t wheat. Switch level assumes a 4% feeding credit."}
+```
+
+The relationship also runs the other way, which is the part people get backwards. If feed wheat is what corn competes with, then corn has a ceiling as well as a floor beneath wheat. Corn would have to reach roughly $240/t — about 609 c/bu — before today's wheat became the cheaper feed. At that point the substitution bid arrives from the other side and caps corn. **Corn is the floor under feed wheat; feed wheat is the ceiling over corn.**
+
+This is also why quotes in the feed market are relational rather than absolute. A feed buyer does not ask where wheat is. He asks where wheat is *against corn* — "eight over", "flat to corn" — because his spreadsheet only understands the difference. He has a ration, not a view.
+
+## The clock
+
+Corn has a weather market nearly every month of the year, but never the same corn.
+
+| Origin | Planting | Critical window | Harvest |
+|---|---|---|---|
+| United States | Apr–May | Pollination, mid-July | Sep–Nov |
+| Ukraine | Apr–May | July | Sep–Oct |
+| Brazil, full season | Sep–Oct | Dec–Jan | Feb–Mar |
+| Brazil, safrinha | Feb–Mar | Pollination, Apr–May | Jun–Aug |
+| Argentina | Sep–Dec | Dec–Feb | Mar–Jul |
+
+Two things in that table matter more than they look. First, the United States and Ukraine sit on the same calendar. Two origins in the same hemisphere with the same critical window are not a diversified supply base — one hemispheric heat pattern can hit both, which is precisely what makes a Northern Hemisphere July the single most consequential month in the corn year.
+
+Second, about three quarters of Brazilian corn is the safrinha, the second crop, drilled into soybean stubble as the beans come off. And the safrinha's dominant risk is not its own weather. It is the soybean harvest date sitting in front of it.
+
+The chain is mechanical. A wet October delays soybean planting. Late planting pushes the bean harvest into late February. A late bean harvest pushes safrinha drilling past its window. And a late safrinha pollinates in May, which is when the centre-west dry season starts. The bet on Brazilian corn is placed in October, in a soybean field, and settled in May.
+
+## The anatomy of a weather premium
+
+A weather premium is not a forecast. It is the price of a distribution: the gap between where corn trades and where it would trade at trend yield.
+
+It builds when the models disagree, and it builds fastest in the ten to fourteen days before a critical window, because that is when the market is buying optionality on an outcome that is still genuinely open. Then it does the thing that makes weather bulls miserable: **it decays whether or not the weather improves.** Time itself removes the possibility of damage. Once the crop has pollinated, no forecast changes the ear count. The calendar is short the weather bull every single day.
+
+Which is why being right on the weather and wrong on the timing loses money — and why, this month, being right on the weather and right on the yield also lost money.
+
+```chart
+{"type":"waterfall","unit":"million bushels",
+ "title":"The drought was paid for out of acres",
+ "caption":"A 2.3 bu/ac yield cut removed 204 million bushels. USDA then found enough planted area to more than replace it, and the crop got bigger.",
+ "source":"USDA WASDE and Crop Production, 12 August 2026.",
+ "steps":[{"label":"July production","value":16000,"kind":"base"},
+          {"label":"Yield −2.3 bu/ac","value":-204},
+          {"label":"Area found","value":217},
+          {"label":"August production","kind":"total"}]}
+```
+
+On 12 August USDA cut the national corn yield to 180.7 bu/ac from 183 — a real cut, the largest the trade was looking for, and the direct consequence of heat and dryness through pollination. On roughly 88.6 million harvested acres, 2.3 bushels is 204 million bushels gone.
+
+Production went up anyway. USDA raised planted area to 96.73 million acres, part of about 2.8 million extra acres found across corn and soybeans, and the crop printed 16.013 billion bushels — the second largest on record. December corn added around 20 cents on the day, gave most of it back over the next two sessions, and closed the week at 477½.
+
+Hidden inside that is a unit distinction worth owning. **Planted acres are not harvested acres.** Around 8 million acres of planted US corn never get cut for grain — silage, abandonment, flood, replant failure. Yield is quoted per *harvested* acre; area news moves on *planted*. Two different denominators in the same sentence, and a balance sheet that only balances if you keep them apart.
+
+The general lesson: a weather premium is a claim on the balance sheet, not on the yield line. Area, demand and carry-in can each pay for a bad yield, and this month area paid in full.

package/ep06.script.txt

@@ -0,0 +1,119 @@
+Corn is the biggest crop in the world, and almost nobody eats it. ||| 0.5
+Most of it is eaten by animals, or burned in an engine. ||| 0.5
+That one fact changes how the whole market trades. ||| 0.7
+This is Soft Commodity Trading, episode six. Corn, crop calendars, and weather risk. ||| 0.8
+First, the tape. ||| 0.5
+Friday closed higher across the board in Chicago. ||| 0.4
+September corn four fifty-nine, up eleven cents. ||| 0.4
+September beans eleven seventy-seven and three quarters, up eleven and three quarters. ||| 0.4
+September Chicago wheat six seventy-four and three quarters, up twenty-two cents. ||| 0.5
+Wheat did the work. Up more than four percent on the week. ||| 0.5
+December Kansas City finished at seven forty-seven and a quarter. ||| 0.6
+Here is why. Ukrainian drones hit Novorossiysk again, and this time all three grain terminals stopped. ||| 0.5
+Russian August loadings are tracking near two and a half million tonnes. ||| 0.4
+That is under half the five-year pace for August, and the weakest August since twenty sixteen. ||| 0.5
+Ukraine's own month-to-date shipments are down seventy-six percent, at two hundred thousand tonnes. ||| 0.5
+The deepwater corridor has been effectively shut since the twenty-second of July. ||| 0.5
+And Russia rejected a partial ceasefire that would have protected civilian shipping. ||| 0.6
+Watch the mechanism, not the headline. Both large sellers are constrained at the same time. ||| 0.5
+Last week the market shrugged, because no buyer had actually switched origin. ||| 0.5
+This week they started to. That is the difference between a threat and a flow. ||| 0.7
+Corn came along for the ride, December at four seventy-seven and a half. ||| 0.5
+Which is a good place to ask a question. ||| 0.4
+Why is corn so slow to follow wheat up? ||| 0.7
+Because corn is a demand story, and demand has a price at which it says no. ||| 0.6
+Start with where corn goes. ||| 0.4
+Roughly two fifths of the American crop is feed. Another large slice is ethanol. ||| 0.4
+Exports take about three and a quarter billion bushels this year. ||| 0.4
+Food and industrial use is the smallest piece. ||| 0.5
+Feed and fuel are both switchable. That is the whole point. ||| 0.5
+Ethanol has its own switch, and it is a margin, not a taste. ||| 0.4
+A plant buys corn and sells ethanol and distillers grains. ||| 0.4
+When that margin goes negative it slows the grind, and corn demand simply stops showing up. ||| 0.5
+So the demand curve for corn is not smooth. It has steps in it. ||| 0.6
+A wheat buyer who needs milling wheat needs milling wheat. ||| 0.4
+A feeder does not need corn. A feeder needs energy and protein. ||| 0.6
+So corn and feed wheat are the same product to a nutritionist, and different products to a miller. ||| 0.7
+Let's price that. ||| 0.5
+Corn is fifty-six pounds to the bushel, so a tonne is about thirty-nine point four bushels. ||| 0.4
+Wheat is sixty pounds, so a tonne is about thirty-six point seven. ||| 0.4
+Two different divisors. This is where people lose the trade. ||| 0.6
+December corn at four seventy-seven and a half is one hundred eighty-eight dollars a tonne. ||| 0.5
+December Chicago wheat at six seventy-nine is two hundred forty-nine and a half a tonne. ||| 0.6
+Now, wheat carries a small feeding credit against corn. More protein, similar energy. ||| 0.4
+Call it four percent. So wheat has to be at or below about one ninety-five to displace corn. ||| 0.6
+It is at two forty-nine. The gap is fifty-four dollars a tonne. ||| 0.7
+Take a mill grinding twenty thousand tonnes a month, sixty percent corn. ||| 0.4
+That is twelve thousand tonnes of corn a month. ||| 0.4
+Switching to wheat would cost that mill six hundred and fifty-four thousand dollars a month. ||| 0.5
+Nobody switches. ||| 0.6
+So how far would wheat have to fall? ||| 0.4
+Fifty-four dollars a tonne is a hundred and forty-eight cents a bushel. ||| 0.4
+Chicago wheat would need to trade near five thirty. ||| 0.5
+That is the distance between the milling market and the feed floor. ||| 0.7
+Here is how it sounds when the gap actually closes. ||| 0.5
+BROKER: Feed wheat, September, delivered mill. I can work you a number. ||| 0.25
+FEEDER: Where against corn? ||| 0.25
+BROKER: Call it eight over on a tonne basis. ||| 0.25
+FEEDER: Eight over is not a switch. Bring me flat and I'll take three cargoes. ||| 0.25
+BROKER: Flat to corn, you take thirty thousand? ||| 0.25
+FEEDER: Flat to corn, I take thirty and I re-formulate this week. ||| 0.7
+Notice what he did not say. He never named a wheat price. ||| 0.5
+He named a relationship. Eight over corn, or flat to corn. ||| 0.5
+The feeder does not have a view on wheat. He has a ration and a spreadsheet. ||| 0.7
+Now turn it around, because this is the part people get backwards. ||| 0.5
+If wheat is the thing corn competes with, then corn has a ceiling too. ||| 0.5
+Corn would have to reach about two hundred forty dollars a tonne to make today's wheat competitive. ||| 0.4
+That is six dollars nine cents a bushel. ||| 0.6
+So corn is the floor under feed wheat, and feed wheat is the ceiling over corn. ||| 0.5
+Two markets, one substitution, working in both directions. ||| 0.7
+Now the clock. ||| 0.5
+Corn has a weather market almost every month of the year, but never the same corn. ||| 0.6
+America plants in April and May, pollinates in the middle of July, harvests from September. ||| 0.5
+Ukraine does the same thing on the same calendar. ||| 0.4
+That matters more than it sounds. The same heat dome can hit both. ||| 0.4
+Two origins on one hemisphere is not diversification. ||| 0.6
+Then the south. Brazil's full-season crop plants in September and comes off in February. ||| 0.4
+But three quarters of Brazil's corn is the safrinha. The second crop. ||| 0.5
+It goes into the ground in February and March, straight into soybean stubble as the beans come off. ||| 0.4
+It pollinates in April and May, and it harvests through the middle of the year. ||| 0.6
+Argentina plants from September and harvests March to July. ||| 0.5
+So the desk's quiet weeks are November through January, and even then it is watching South American planting. ||| 0.7
+Here is the part that is not obvious. ||| 0.5
+The safrinha's biggest risk is not its own weather. ||| 0.5
+It is the soybean harvest date in front of it. ||| 0.6
+A wet October delays soybean planting. A late planting delays the bean harvest into February. ||| 0.4
+A late bean harvest pushes safrinha planting past its window. ||| 0.4
+And a late safrinha pollinates in May, which is the start of the Brazilian dry season. ||| 0.6
+So the real bet on Brazilian corn is made in October, in a soybean field. ||| 0.7
+Which brings us to the weather premium itself. ||| 0.5
+A weather premium is not a forecast. It is the price of a distribution. ||| 0.5
+It is the gap between where corn trades and where corn would trade at trend yield. ||| 0.6
+It builds when the models disagree, and it builds fastest ten to fourteen days before the critical window. ||| 0.5
+Then it does something people find painful. ||| 0.5
+It decays whether or not the weather improves. ||| 0.6
+Because time itself removes the possibility of damage. ||| 0.4
+Once the corn has pollinated, no forecast on earth changes the ear count. ||| 0.5
+The calendar is short the weather bull, every single day. ||| 0.7
+Look at what just happened. ||| 0.5
+U S D A cut the corn yield to one eighty point seven, from one eighty-three. ||| 0.4
+That is a real cut. Two point three bushels off the national yield. ||| 0.5
+On roughly eighty-eight and a half million harvested acres, that is two hundred million bushels gone. ||| 0.6
+And production went up. ||| 0.6
+Because U S D A found acres. Planted area went to ninety-six point seven million. ||| 0.5
+Two point eight million extra acres across corn and beans. ||| 0.4
+The crop came in at sixteen point zero one three billion bushels. Second largest on record. ||| 0.7
+That is the weather premium being paid for out of area. ||| 0.5
+A trader who was right on the drought, and right on the yield cut, still made almost nothing. ||| 0.6
+And here is the unit that hid it. Planted acres are not harvested acres. ||| 0.4
+Around eight million acres of planted corn never get cut for grain. ||| 0.4
+Silage, abandonment, flood. Yield is quoted per harvested acre, area moves on planted. ||| 0.5
+Two different denominators in the same sentence. ||| 0.7
+So what do you actually remember. ||| 0.6
+Corn is a demand story. Feed and fuel both walk away at a price. ||| 0.5
+Substitution runs both ways. Corn floors feed wheat, feed wheat caps corn. ||| 0.5
+The weather premium decays on the calendar, not on the forecast. ||| 0.5
+And the safrinha is decided by the soybean harvest before it. ||| 0.7
+Tomorrow, the report that stops every grain desk. W A S D E, and how to build a balance sheet you can actually flex. ||| 0.5
+The quiz is in the notes, with a conversion drill and full solutions. ||| 0.5
+This has been Soft Commodity Trading. ||| 0.5

package/feed.xml

@@ -18,6 +18,18 @@
       <title>Soft Commodity Trading</title>
       <link>https://storage.googleapis.com/podcast-audio-2647223968/index.html</link>
     </image>
+    <item>
+      <title>Ep 6 — Corn, Crop Calendars and Weather Risk</title>
+      <link>https://storage.googleapis.com/podcast-audio-2647223968/commodity-desk-daily/ep06.html</link>
+      <description><![CDATA[<p>Corn is a demand story: feed and ethanol both walk away at a price, so corn is the floor under feed wheat and feed wheat is the ceiling over corn. Then the crop calendar and the anatomy of a weather premium, which decays on the clock rather than the forecast.</p><p><a href="https://storage.googleapis.com/podcast-audio-2647223968/commodity-desk-daily/ep06.html">Read this episode, with the charts, the glossary and the quiz &rarr;</a></p>]]></description>
+      <itunes:summary>Corn is a demand story: feed and ethanol both walk away at a price, so corn is the floor under feed wheat and feed wheat is the ceiling over corn. Then the crop calendar and the anatomy of a weather premium, which decays on the clock rather than the forecast.
+
+Read this episode: https://storage.googleapis.com/podcast-audio-2647223968/commodity-desk-daily/ep06.html</itunes:summary>
+      <enclosure url="https://storage.googleapis.com/podcast-audio-2647223968/commodity-desk-daily/ep06.mp3" length="9056492" type="audio/mpeg"/>
+      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://storage.googleapis.com/podcast-audio-2647223968/commodity-desk-daily/ep06.mp3</guid>
+      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2026 05:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
+      <itunes:duration>754</itunes:duration>
+    </item>
     <item>
       <title>Ep 5 — Wheat: The Map and the Screens</title>
       <link>https://storage.googleapis.com/podcast-audio-2647223968/commodity-desk-daily/ep05.html</link>

package/glossary.md

@@ -2,6 +2,7 @@
 
 Units, conventions and desk expressions, accumulated as the show introduces them.
 
+- **abandonment** — planted area never harvested for grain, lost to drought, flood or a switch to silage  _(ep 6)_
 - **ABCD** — the four historic majors, Archer Daniels Midland, Bunge, Cargill and Louis Dreyfus  _(ep 2)_
 - **arb** — the full economics of moving a cargo, buy price plus freight and costs against the sale  _(ep 2)_
 - **asset-heavy** — owning the physical chain, which converts a volatile trading margin into a steadier toll  _(ep 2)_
@@ -30,10 +31,14 @@ Units, conventions and desk expressions, accumulated as the show introduces them
 - **despatch** — the reward paid when loading beats laytime, customarily half the demurrage rate  _(ep 4)_
 - **differential** — the premium or discount to a named futures month, as in November plus 80, the negotiated part of a physical quote  _(ep 1)_
 - **differential (basis)** — the premium or discount to a named futures month, quoted as plus 80 or minus 20  _(ep 1)_
+- **distillers grains** — DDGS, the protein co-product of ethanol production, sold back into the feed market  _(ep 6)_
 - **done** — the word that seals a trade  _(ep 1)_
 - **draft survey** — weighing a cargo by reading the ship's displacement before and after loading  _(ep 4)_
 - **durum** — the pasta wheat, a separate species with its own thin market  _(ep 5)_
+- **ethanol grind** — the rate at which ethanol plants consume corn, which slows when the plant margin turns negative and removes corn demand in steps  _(ep 6)_
 - **falling number** — the sprout-damage test, a low number demotes milling wheat to feed wheat  _(ep 5)_
+- **feed floor** — the price at which feed substitution demand appears under a grain, corn setting the floor under feed wheat  _(ep 6)_
+- **feed wheat** — wheat sold on energy and protein rather than milling specification, priced relationally against corn rather than at a flat price  _(ep 6)_
 - **firm** — a tradable quote that binds if accepted, often with a time limit  _(ep 1)_
 - **five percent more or less** — the contractual tolerance on cargo size, exercised at the seller's option  _(ep 1)_
 - **flat price** — the full outright price level  _(ep 1)_
@@ -43,8 +48,10 @@ Units, conventions and desk expressions, accumulated as the show introduces them
 - **full carry** — storage plus interest per month of holding grain, the practical ceiling on a carry spread  _(ep 3)_
 - **hard red spring (HRS)** — the 13.5 percent plus Minneapolis wheat bought to lift the protein of a grist  _(ep 5)_
 - **hard red winter (HRW)** — the 11 to 12.5 percent bread wheat priced at Kansas City, the US wheat that competes with the Black Sea  _(ep 5)_
+- **harvested acres** — area actually cut for grain, roughly 8 million acres below planted for US corn, and the denominator that yield is quoted against  _(ep 6)_
 - **hit** — your bid was taken by a seller  _(ep 1)_
 - **hit the bid** — to sell into someone else's bid  _(ep 1)_
+- **inclusion rate** — the share of a single ingredient in a feed ration, capped by nutrition and by anti-nutritional factors  _(ep 6)_
 - **Incoterms** — the standard three-letter trade terms that allocate cost and risk between buyer and seller  _(ep 4)_
 - **indication** — a guide price that is not firm  _(ep 1)_
 - **initial margin** — the deposit the clearing house takes per lot when a position is opened  _(ep 3)_
@@ -65,14 +72,18 @@ Units, conventions and desk expressions, accumulated as the show introduces them
 - **offer** — the price a seller will accept  _(ep 1)_
 - **paper** — exchange futures and options, used by a physical desk to hedge rather than to speculate  _(ep 2)_
 - **physical (cash)** — real cargoes under contract with specs and load windows, as opposed to paper  _(ep 2)_
+- **planted acres** — area sown, the number that moves on farmer decisions and USDA area surveys  _(ep 6)_
 - **point** — one hundredth of a cent per pound, how softs desks count moves  _(ep 1)_
 - **point (softs)** — one hundredth of a cent per pound, so up 300 points means up 3 cents  _(ep 1)_
+- **pollination** — the roughly one-week corn window in mid-July in the northern hemisphere after which the ear count is fixed and no forecast can change it  _(ep 6)_
 - **price assessment** — a published daily price built by surveying brokers and exporters, used where no futures contract exists  _(ep 5)_
 - **prompt** — the nearby month or shipment window, ready to move now  _(ep 1)_
 - **protein spec** — the contractual protein percentage that turns the word wheat into a price  _(ep 5)_
 - **quality basis** — the spread between the grade you own and the grade the futures contract delivers  _(ep 5)_
+- **ration** — the formulated feed mix a mill grinds, in which every ingredient carries an inclusion limit and a substitution price against the others  _(ep 6)_
 - **residual** — a figure obtained by subtraction, such as ending stocks, which absorbs any error in the larger numbers almost in full  _(ep 2)_
 - **roll** — closing a hedge in one month and reopening it further out, executed as a spread trade  _(ep 3)_
+- **safrinha** — Brazil's second corn crop, planted February to March into soybean stubble and pollinating April to May, about three quarters of Brazilian corn production  _(ep 6)_
 - **short ton** — 2,000 lb, used by US soybean meal, about 10 percent lighter than a metric tonne  _(ep 1)_
 - **soft red winter (SRW)** — the low-protein soft wheat the Chicago contract delivers, used for cakes biscuits and crackers  _(ep 5)_
 - **space time form** — the three transformations a merchant is paid for, geography, storage and processing  _(ep 2)_
@@ -81,11 +92,13 @@ Units, conventions and desk expressions, accumulated as the show introduces them
 - **test weight** — the density measure telling a miller how much flour comes out of a tonne  _(ep 5)_
 - **tick** — smallest price increment, a quarter cent per bushel in Chicago grains, worth 12.50 dollars per lot  _(ep 1)_
 - **ticker** — the short screen code a contract is spoken by, ZW wheat, ZC corn, ZS soybeans, ZM meal, ZL oil, KC coffee, SB sugar, CT cotton  _(ep 3)_
+- **trend yield** — the yield a crop would produce on normal weather, the baseline against which a weather premium is measured  _(ep 6)_
 - **variation margin** — the daily cash settlement of a position mark to market, paid the same day  _(ep 3)_
 - **war-risk premium** — an insurance surcharge on a vessel's hull value for sailing into a conflict zone, quoted as a percentage  _(ep 2)_
 - **WASDE** — the USDA monthly World Agricultural Supply and Demand Estimates report  _(ep 1)_
 - **washed out** — offsetting trades cancel each other and only the price difference is settled  _(ep 1)_
 - **washout** — cancelling two offsetting physical contracts by settling the price difference instead of shipping  _(ep 1)_
+- **weather premium** — the gap between where a crop trades and where it would trade at trend yield, the price of a distribution of outcomes rather than of a forecast  _(ep 6)_
 - **weather working day** — a laytime day that counts only when weather permits cargo work  _(ep 4)_
 - **work** — leave an order resting with a broker  _(ep 1)_
 - **work an order** — leave an order resting at your price and wait  _(ep 1)_

package/package.json

@@ -1,12 +1,12 @@
-{
-  "name": "@sdelsad/commodity-desk-daily",
-  "version": "1.0.18",
-  "description": "Soft Commodity Trading - Ep 5: Wheat: The Map and the Screens",
-  "license": "CC-BY-4.0",
-  "keywords": [
-    "podcast",
-    "commodities",
-    "trading",
-    "education"
-  ]
-}
+{
+  "name": "@sdelsad/commodity-desk-daily",
+  "version": "1.0.19",
+  "description": "Soft Commodity Trading - Ep 6: Corn, Crop Calendars and Weather Risk",
+  "license": "CC-BY-4.0",
+  "keywords": [
+    "podcast",
+    "commodities",
+    "trading",
+    "education"
+  ]
+}

package/ep05.md

@@ -1,205 +0,0 @@
-# Soft Commodity Trading — Ep 5
-## Wheat: The Map and the Screens
-
----
-
-## Market pulse
-
-**Two ports burned in two nights, and Chicago wheat finished the week exactly where it started.**
-
-| Contract | Thursday 13 Aug | Change |
-|---|---|---|
-| Corn, December | $4.77¾ /bu | −0.6% |
-| Soybeans, November | $11.81¾ /bu | ~unchanged |
-| Wheat, Chicago September | $6.51¼ /bu | −0.2% |
-| Wheat, Kansas City September *(Wed 12 Aug settle)* | $7.20¾ /bu | +21½¢ |
-
-Thursday was a give-back session. Corn handed back part of Wednesday's yield-cut rally on profit-taking; soybeans held, supported by a third consecutive day of announced Chinese new-crop buying — 505,000 t in total across the three days. Wheat consolidated.
-
-```chart
-{"type":"line","mode":"index","unit":"Mon 10 Aug = 100","title":"Four sessions, one round trip",
- "caption":"Only corn kept the WASDE move. Chicago wheat ended the week where it began, despite two grain ports being hit.",
- "source":"CME settlements 10-12 Aug 2026 (episode pulses); Reuters quotes 13 Aug 2026",
- "x":["Mon 10","Tue 11","Wed 12","Thu 13"],
- "series":[{"name":"Dec corn","values":[465,460.5,480.75,477.75]},
-           {"name":"Nov soybeans","values":[1182,1168.75,1183.25,1181.75]},
-           {"name":"Sep Chicago wheat","values":[651,630.25,652.75,651.25]}]}
-```
-
-**The geopolitical read.** The exchange completed itself overnight: after Wednesday's Ukrainian strike idled two Novorossiysk grain terminals, Russian drones hit **Izmail**, Ukraine's Danube port — the fallback route that had been carrying the trade since deepwater corridor loadings fell to effectively zero on 22 July. Ukrainian shipments in early August were already running 76% below a year earlier; the season's wheat export forecast is 8.3 Mt. USDA cut combined Russian and Ukrainian exports by 2.5 Mt in Wednesday's report.
-
-And Chicago did nothing. That is the useful part. US wheat export sales last week were 255,900 t, down 14% on the week, and USDA now has the US taking **9.9%** of world wheat trade against 10.9% before. Destroyed supply only reaches a price when a buyer switches origin — and when Black Sea wheat goes dark, Egypt, Algeria and Bangladesh call France, Argentina and Australia. Flow substitution is the mechanism, and it does not point at Chicago.
-
----
-
-### Key takeaways
-
-- **Wheat is a category, not a commodity.** Soft red winter (~10% protein, Chicago) is a biscuit wheat. Hard red winter (11–12.5%, Kansas City) is bread, and the US wheat that competes with the Black Sea. Hard red spring (13.5%+, Minneapolis) is bought to lift the protein of a grist. Durum is a different species. Black Sea milling (11.5–12.5%) is the volume of the world.
-- **Protein is not the only spec that prices a cargo.** **Test weight** tells the miller how much flour comes out of a tonne; **falling number** measures sprout damage. A low falling number turns milling wheat into feed wheat in an afternoon — the same field, roughly $40/t less.
-- **Four exchanges, four different wheats.** Chicago (SRW) and Kansas City (HRW) trade 5,000 bu lots in ¢/bu; Minneapolis trades HRS; Matif trades EU milling wheat in **50-tonne lots, euros per tonne**, delivered into Rouen and Dunkirk. A Chicago tick is $12.50 a lot; a Matif tick is €12.50 a lot — the same small number on very different quantities of grain.
-- **The KC–Chicago spread is information.** At Wednesday's KC settle and Thursday's Chicago quote it was about 68¢/bu, or $26/t. That is the price of two protein points and a different customer base, not a mispricing.
-- **The largest wheat exporter on earth has no futures contract.** Black Sea wheat is priced by daily **assessment**. An assessment can be referenced in a contract but cannot be bought, sold or hedged.
-- **So Black Sea risk gets cross-hedged** — and a cross-hedge protects you against the world moving, not against your own market moving. Worked example: 60,000 t of Russian 12.5% hedged with 1,200 Matif lots loses **$452,000** when Europe rallies €10/t and the Russian cargo, stuck behind a damaged terminal, gains only $4/t.
-- The correlation that justified the hedge is highest on quiet days and lowest on the day it is tested. And a Matif hedge on a dollar cargo is also a euro position — hedge it, or say out loud that you are running it.
-
-### Vocabulary of the day
-
-| Term | Meaning |
-|---|---|
-| SRW — soft red winter | Low-protein soft wheat, the Chicago deliverable; cakes, biscuits, crackers |
-| HRW — hard red winter | 11–12.5% bread wheat, priced at Kansas City; the US export wheat |
-| HRS — hard red spring | 13.5%+ Minneapolis wheat, bought to lift the protein of a blend |
-| Durum | The pasta wheat — a separate species with its own thin market |
-| Protein spec | The contractual protein percentage that turns "wheat" into a price |
-| Test weight | Density measure; how much flour a miller extracts from a tonne |
-| Falling number | Sprout-damage test; a low number demotes milling wheat to feed |
-| Matif milling wheat (EBM) | Paris contract: 50 t per lot, €/t, delivered Rouen and Dunkirk |
-| Price assessment | A published daily price built by surveying the trade, where no futures exist |
-| Cross-hedge | Hedging with a contract that is not your grade or origin |
-| Inter-exchange spread | The gap between two exchanges pricing related but different goods |
-
----
-
-## Quiz — Day 5
-
-**J-0 — Episode 5: Wheat, the map and the screens**
-
-**Q1.** You buy 60,000 t of Russian 12.5% milling wheat FOB at $224/t, unsold, and want the flat price off tonight. (a) How many lots is that in Matif, and how many in Chicago? (b) Why would a desk choose Matif over Chicago for this cargo, even though Chicago is far more liquid? (c) Name the three distinct exposures that are still on your book after the Matif hedge is executed.
-
-**Q2.** Over the following month, both wheats rally, but the KC–Chicago spread narrows from 68¢ to 30¢. You are long an HRW export cargo that you hedged in **Chicago**. (a) What is the spread telling you about the market? (b) Did your hedge help or hurt, and why? (c) What would you have had to do differently, and what would that have cost you in liquidity?
-
-**Q3.** You bought 25,000 t of French milling wheat, 11.5% protein, for October delivery, priced at a differential over Matif, and sold the Matif futures against it. Harvest rain arrives; the parcel tests at a falling number of 180 and the buyer's mill rejects it. Feed wheat is trading roughly $40/t under milling. (a) Quantify the loss. (b) Did the Matif hedge protect any of it? (c) Which episode-4 document decides whether this is your problem or the seller's?
-
-**J-1 — Episode 4: The physical chain, end to end**
-
-**Q4.** A Handysize loads 30,000 t at 6,000 t per weather working day. She tenders NOR on the 5th; loading takes 8 calendar days, and the statement of facts records one full day on which rain stopped all work. Demurrage is $12,000/day, despatch at half. (a) Who owes whom, and how much? (b) If instead she had finished one day inside laytime, what would have been paid, and by whom?
-
-**Q5.** You sell 60,000 t of wheat **CFR Alexandria** and have not yet fixed the vessel. Freight rallies $8/t before you charter. (a) Who carries that cost? (b) Would selling FOB have changed the answer, and what would you have given up instead? (c) If the cargo is lost mid-ocean, who bears it — and does the answer change between CFR and CIF?
-
-**J-3 — Episode 2: What a merchant does, and why basis is the whole game**
-
-**Q6.** You are long 60,000 t of physical soybeans, fully hedged with short futures. The board rallies $1.00/bu over two weeks and a colleague congratulates you on the market. (a) What is your actual P&L from that move? (b) What would have had to happen instead for the position to make $220,000? (c) State the general principle in one sentence.
-
-**Q7.** Two merchants quote the same import tender. One is asset-light; the other owns the export terminal at the load port. (a) Which of *space, time, form* does each of them capture? (b) Why can the terminal owner usually bid more aggressively and still be safe? (c) What has the terminal owner given up in exchange?
-
----
-
-<br><br>
-
-## ▼ SOLUTIONS (spoilers) — scroll only after answering ▼
-
-<br><br>
-
-**A1.** (a) Matif is **50 t per lot**, so 60,000 t = **1,200 lots**. Chicago is 5,000 bu per lot and wheat converts at ~36.7 bu/t, so 60,000 t ≈ 2.2 m bu = **440 lots**. Same grain, very different ticket counts — "sell 1,200" and "sell 440" describe the identical tonnage. (b) Because the hedge has to track *your* cargo, and European milling wheat sells to the same customers as Russian wheat — North Africa, the Middle East, the same tender books, often the same vessels. Chicago prices soft red winter into a domestic delivery point for a different demand pool. Liquidity is worthless if the contract is uncorrelated with what you own. (c) Three exposures survive: **(1) cross-hedge / quality basis risk** — Russian 12.5% FOB versus EU milling can move apart, sometimes violently; **(2) currency** — the hedge settles in euros and the cargo is priced in dollars, so 1,200 lots at this summer's Paris levels is roughly €13–14m of FX exposure created *by the hedge*; **(3) freight and execution** — the cargo still has to be loaded and shipped, and none of that is in either price. The trap the question tests: people count the hedge as risk removed and forget that it *adds* two exposures of its own.
-
-**A2.** (a) A narrowing KC–Chicago spread means the **premium for bread-making protein is deflating** — HRW is losing its scarcity, typically because the export bid has moved elsewhere (a competing origin is winning the tenders) or because new-crop HRW supply is arriving. (b) Your hedge **hurt**. You were short Chicago against long HRW. Chicago rallied *more* than KC in relative terms (that is what a narrowing KC-over-Chicago spread means), so the short leg lost more than the physical gained. You were never hedged against wheat — you were short the KC-over-Chicago spread without deciding to be. (c) You should have hedged in **KC**, the contract for the wheat you actually own. The cost is liquidity: KC is materially thinner than Chicago, so the bid-offer and the slippage on a large roll are worse. That is the real trade-off — a worse fill in the right contract beats a perfect fill in the wrong one.
-
-**A3.** (a) A falling number of 180 is well inside sprout-damaged territory; the parcel is no longer milling wheat. At roughly $40/t of milling-over-feed, 25,000 t × $40 = **$1,000,000** of value destroyed, before you account for having to find a feed buyer at all, which may take a discount of its own. (b) **No.** The Matif hedge protects the flat price of *milling* wheat. Your loss is a **quality basis** loss: the spread between what you own and what the contract delivers. The futures leg does exactly what it promised and is entirely beside the point — this is the same failure mode as Q1(c), arriving through grade rather than geography. (c) The **load-port quality certificate**, which in most grain contracts is **final**. If the certificate at loading showed the cargo on spec, the risk has passed and the buyer's rejection is a dispute you are likely to win; if the cargo tested off-spec at load, it was never conforming and it is squarely your problem.
-
-**A4.** (a) Allowed laytime = 30,000 ÷ 6,000 = **5 weather working days**. Eight calendar days minus the rain day = **7 laytime days used**, so she is **2 days over**. The **charterer owes the owner 2 × $12,000 = $24,000** in demurrage. (Without the weather clause the bill would have been 3 days, $36,000 — the clause is worth $12,000 here.) (b) Finishing one day inside laytime earns **despatch**, customarily half the demurrage rate: the **owner pays the charterer $6,000**. The clock runs both ways, and that asymmetry — full rate against you, half rate for you — is why operators fight for hours, not days.
-
-**A5.** (a) **You do.** Under CFR the seller pays the freight to the destination, so an unfixed freight position is an open short: the $8/t rally costs you 60,000 × $8 = **$480,000**, and it lands on the trade even though the wheat price never moved. Selling CFR before fixing the vessel is a freight position, whether or not anyone called it one. (b) Selling **FOB** would have put the chartering — and this loss — on the buyer. What you give up is the freight economics and the control: an FOB sale hands away any margin you could earn between the freight you pay and the freight you charge, and it hands the buyer the choice of vessel, which is also the choice of laycan. (c) The cargo loss is the **buyer's** in both cases — risk passes at loading under CFR *and* CIF. The only difference is who bought the insurance: under CIF you procured the policy for the buyer's benefit and the buyer claims on it; under CFR the buyer had to arrange their own cover, and if they did not, that is their exposure, not yours. Cost and risk travel separately.
-
-**A6.** (a) **Approximately zero.** The physical length gains $1.00/bu and the short futures lose $1.00/bu; on ~2.2 m bu that is roughly $2.2m each way, and they cancel. That is the point of the hedge, and it is why a bull market does not enrich a hedged merchant. (b) The **differential** would have had to move. On 60,000 t (~2.2 m bu), 10¢/bu of basis improvement ≈ **$220,000** — buy 10¢ better, or sell 10¢ better, and that is the entire P&L. (c) In one sentence: **a merchant hedges away the flat price and is paid for the basis**, which is the price of logistics, quality and urgency.
-
-**A7.** (a) The asset-light merchant captures **space** — moving the cargo from an origin that has it to a destination that wants it — and can capture **time** only by paying someone else for storage. The terminal owner captures **space and time**, and if there is processing behind the terminal, **form** as well. (b) Because the terminal owner earns a second income stream — the elevation and throughput fee — on the same cargo. That toll is largely independent of the trading margin, so the same bid price carries a better expected return; the owner can shave the trading margin to win the tender and still be paid. In a congested port the effect is larger still: owning the bottleneck means the cargo loads while competitors queue. (c) Fixed costs and inflexibility. The asset must be fed volume in bad years as well as good, it cannot be redeployed to another origin when the flow reroutes, and it converts a variable, direction-neutral margin into a business with operational leverage.
-
----
-
-## The episode, in writing
-
-### The tape: two ports, and a market that shrugged
-
-Thursday gave back part of Wednesday. December corn slipped about 0.6% to $4.77¾ on profit-taking after the yield cut; November soybeans finished roughly flat at $11.81¾, held up by a third straight day of announced Chinese new-crop buying — 505,000 t across the three days. Chicago September wheat eased 0.2% to $6.51¼.
-
-Overnight, Russian drones struck **Izmail**, Ukraine's Danube port. That is the fallback route: deepwater corridor loadings have been effectively zero since 22 July, and the Danube has been carrying what could still move. Wednesday it was Novorossiysk's two grain terminals; Thursday it was the alternative to them.
-
-The numbers around it are large. Ukrainian shipments in early August ran 76% below a year earlier. The season's wheat export forecast is 8.3 Mt. USDA took 2.5 Mt off combined Russian and Ukrainian exports in Wednesday's report.
-
-And Chicago wheat closed the week unchanged. That is the more interesting fact. US export sales last week were 255,900 t, down 14% on the week, and USDA now has the US taking 9.9% of world wheat trade, down from 10.9%.
-
-The mechanism is **flow substitution**, and it has a condition attached: destroyed supply reaches your price only if a buyer actually switches to you. When Black Sea wheat goes dark, Egypt, Algeria and Bangladesh call France, Argentina and Australia. The premium is real; it is simply being paid somewhere other than Chicago. Which is the subject of the day.
-
-### One word, five commodities
-
-Strip the word "wheat" off the contract and what remains is a protein specification, a hardness, and a set of customers.
-
-| Class | Protein | Where it prices | What it becomes |
-|---|---|---|---|
-| Soft red winter (SRW) | ~10% | **Chicago** | Cakes, biscuits, crackers |
-| Hard red winter (HRW) | 11–12.5% | **Kansas City** | Bread — and US exports |
-| Hard red spring (HRS) | 13.5%+ | **Minneapolis** | Blending, to lift a grist |
-| Durum | — | Thin, largely cash | Semolina and pasta |
-| Black Sea milling | 11.5–12.5% | **Assessments only** | Bread, most of the world's |
-
-Protein is the headline spec, not the only one. **Test weight** tells a miller how much flour comes out of a tonne. **Falling number** measures sprout damage: rain on a ripe crop starts the starch breaking down, and the dough will not hold. A low falling number demotes milling wheat to feed wheat in an afternoon — same field, same truck, roughly $40 a tonne less.
-
-On the desk that arrives as a spec negotiation, not a price negotiation:
-
-> **MILL:** What have you got for October, twelve and a half?
-> **SELLER:** Twelve five I can do. Falling number 280, test weight 78.
-> **MILL:** And at eleven five?
-> **SELLER:** Eleven five is nine dollars under.
-> **MILL:** Work me twelve five, sixty thousand, and send me the analysis certificate.
-
-Neither of them said the word wheat. They exchanged a protein, a falling number and a test weight — and the nine dollars between two of those numbers is the whole negotiation.
-
-### Four screens for one grain
-
-Chicago and Kansas City both trade 5,000-bushel lots quoted in cents per bushel, on soft red and hard red winter respectively. Minneapolis trades hard red spring. Paris — Matif — trades EU milling wheat in **50-tonne lots quoted in euros per tonne**, delivered into silo at Rouen and Dunkirk.
-
-One symmetry worth remembering, because it catches people:
-
-| | Tick | Lot | Value of a tick |
-|---|---|---|---|
-| Chicago | ¼¢/bu | 5,000 bu | **$12.50** |
-| Matif | €0.25/t | 50 t | **€12.50** |
-
-The same small number, in two currencies, on completely different quantities of grain. Sixty thousand tonnes is 440 Chicago lots and 1,200 Matif lots. Get the lot size wrong and you are not hedged, you are positioned.
-
-Put the two American contracts into the same unit and the spread becomes legible. Chicago at $6.51¼ is **$239/t**. Kansas City at Wednesday's $7.20¾ settle is **$265/t**. That is 68¢/bu, or $26/t, of KC over Chicago.
-
-```chart
-{"type":"bar","unit":"$ per tonne","title":"One word, three prices",
- "caption":"Forty-one dollars a tonne between the cheapest and the dearest - and none of it is an arbitrage.",
- "source":"Chicago Sep quote 13 Aug 2026; Kansas City Sep settlement 12 Aug 2026; Black Sea 12.5% FOB assessment, early August 2026",
- "x":["Black Sea 12.5% FOB","Chicago SRW Sep","Kansas City HRW Sep"],
- "series":[{"name":"$/t","values":[224,239,265]}]}
-```
-
-That spread is not a mispricing waiting to be collected. It is the price of two protein points, a different delivery geography and a different customer base. It is also information: when KC over Chicago widens, bread wheat is getting scarce; when it collapses, the export bid has gone somewhere else.
-
-### The hole in the middle of the map
-
-Russia is the largest wheat exporter in the world. Russia has no wheat futures contract that the world trades.
-
-Black Sea wheat is priced by **assessment**. Reporting agencies survey brokers and exporters daily, collect the bids, the offers and the trades that actually happened, and publish a number. That number is what an FOB cargo settles against, and physical contracts reference it by name.
-
-But an assessment is not a settlement. There is no clearing house behind it, no order book, no margin. You cannot buy it, sell it or hedge on it. So a desk long Russian wheat has to hedge with a contract that trades somebody else's grain — a **cross-hedge** — and thereby swap one risk for another.
-
-### The cross-hedge, priced
-
-Take 60,000 t of Russian 12.5% bought FOB at about $224/t in early August, unsold, and put the hedge on tonight.
-
-Chicago is the wrong wheat and the wrong customers. Matif is closer: European milling wheat competes for the same North African and Middle Eastern tenders. So sell 1,200 Matif lots.
-
-Now let three weeks pass. Europe rallies €10/t — about $11.50 at 1.15. The Russian cargo, sitting behind a damaged loading terminal and discounted to find any buyer at all, gains $4/t.
-
-```chart
-{"type":"waterfall","unit":"$ thousand","title":"Hedged, and down half a million",
- "caption":"The hedge moved nearly three times as far as the cargo it was hedging.",
- "source":"Worked example, episode 5",
- "steps":[{"label":"Physical cargo, +$4/t","value":240,"kind":"base"},
-          {"label":"Short Matif, -$11.50/t","value":-692},
-          {"label":"Net on a hedged book","kind":"total"}]}
-```
-
-Minus $452,000, or about $7.50 a tonne, on a position the book calls flat.
-
-The general form matters more than the arithmetic. **A cross-hedge protects you against the world moving. It does not protect you against your own market moving.** An export tax in Moscow moves Russian FOB and does nothing to Paris. A wet harvest in northern France moves Paris and does nothing to Russia. And a strike on a loading terminal can lift the world price while making the grain stuck behind that terminal cheaper — which is the week the market has just had.
-
-So the correlation measured over two years of history, the number that justified the hedge in the first place, is at its highest on the quiet days and at its lowest on the day it is tested. Correlation is a fair-weather instrument.
-
-There is one further leak, and it is the one people forget. The Matif hedge settles in euros; the cargo is priced in dollars. Twelve hundred lots at this summer's Paris levels is something like €13–14m of currency exposure created entirely by the act of hedging. Hedge the grain and you have bought a currency position. Hedge that too — or say out loud that you are running it.
-
-**Monday:** corn. Crop calendars, the critical windows, and why one dry week in July outweighs a dry month in October.

package/ep05.script.txt

@@ -1,97 +0,0 @@
-Three exchanges. One word on the label. And forty dollars a tonne between them. ||| 0.6
-This is Soft Commodity Trading, episode five. ||| 0.4
-Wheat. The map, and the screens. And why the largest wheat exporter on earth has no futures contract at all. ||| 0.8
-First, the tape. ||| 0.4
-Thursday was a give-back day. ||| 0.35
-December corn slipped about half a percent, to four seventy-seven and three quarters. Profit-taking after Wednesday's yield cut. ||| 0.4
-November soybeans finished roughly flat, at eleven eighty-one and three quarters. ||| 0.35
-Chicago September wheat, six fifty-one and a quarter. Down a fraction. ||| 0.5
-Underneath the beans, one thing worth keeping: China bought new-crop U S soybeans on three consecutive days. Five hundred and five thousand tonnes in total. ||| 0.6
-Now the geopolitics, because wheat's week has not been happening on a screen. ||| 0.45
-Overnight, Russian drones hit Izmail. ||| 0.35
-Izmail is Ukraine's Danube port. The fallback route. The one still working after deepwater corridor loadings went to effectively zero on the twenty-second of July. ||| 0.5
-So the sequence is this. Wednesday, Ukraine idles two Russian grain terminals at Novorossiysk. Thursday, Russia burns the Ukrainian fallback. ||| 0.55
-Ukrainian shipments in early August were already running seventy-six percent below last year. The season forecast is eight point three million tonnes of wheat. ||| 0.5
-And Chicago wheat did nothing. ||| 0.6
-Hold onto that. It is the most instructive thing on the tape. ||| 0.45
-U S wheat export sales last week were two hundred and fifty-six thousand tonnes. Down fourteen percent on the week. ||| 0.4
-And the U S D A now has the United States taking nine point nine percent of world wheat trade. Down from ten point nine. ||| 0.5
-Supply is being destroyed in the Black Sea, and the American price is not moving. ||| 0.45
-Because a disruption only reaches your price if a buyer actually switches to you. ||| 0.45
-Egypt, Algeria, Bangladesh. When Black Sea wheat goes dark, they call France, Argentina, Australia. ||| 0.4
-They do not call Chicago. ||| 0.6
-Which is exactly today's subject. ||| 0.8
-Wheat is not a commodity. It is a category. ||| 0.55
-Start with protein. ||| 0.35
-Soft red winter is the Chicago wheat. Around ten percent protein. Soft, weak gluten. Cakes, biscuits, crackers. ||| 0.5
-Hard red winter is the Kansas City wheat. Eleven to twelve and a half percent. This is bread. It is also the American wheat that competes head-on with the Black Sea. ||| 0.55
-Hard red spring is Minneapolis. Thirteen and a half and up. Almost nobody bakes a loaf out of spring wheat alone. You buy it to lift the protein of everything else in the mill. ||| 0.6
-Durum is a different species. Semolina, pasta, its own thin market, and it does not trade against the others at all. ||| 0.5
-And Black Sea milling wheat, eleven and a half to twelve and a half, is simply the volume of the world. ||| 0.6
-Protein is not the only spec that prices a cargo. ||| 0.4
-Test weight tells the miller how much flour comes out of a tonne. ||| 0.35
-Falling number measures sprout damage. Rain on a ripe crop, the starch starts breaking down, and the dough will not hold. ||| 0.45
-A low falling number turns milling wheat into feed wheat in an afternoon. Same field, same truck, forty dollars a tonne less. ||| 0.7
-Here is how that actually gets priced, in the six seconds it takes. ||| 0.5
-MILL: What have you got for October, twelve and a half? ||| 0.25
-SELLER: Twelve five I can do. Falling number two eighty, test weight seventy-eight. ||| 0.25
-MILL: And at eleven five? ||| 0.25
-SELLER: Eleven five is nine dollars under. ||| 0.25
-MILL: Work me twelve five, sixty thousand, and send me the analysis certificate. ||| 0.6
-Notice that neither of them said the word wheat. ||| 0.45
-They said a protein, a falling number and a test weight. And the nine dollars between two of those numbers is the entire negotiation. ||| 0.8
-So. The screens. ||| 0.4
-Chicago trades soft red winter. Five thousand bushels a lot, cents per bushel. ||| 0.4
-Kansas City trades hard red winter. Same size, same units. ||| 0.35
-Minneapolis trades hard red spring. ||| 0.35
-And Paris, Matif, trades E U milling wheat. Fifty tonnes a lot, euros per tonne, delivered into Rouen and Dunkirk. ||| 0.55
-One detail worth carrying. A Chicago tick is a quarter of a cent on five thousand bushels. Twelve dollars fifty. ||| 0.45
-A Matif tick is twenty-five euro cents on fifty tonnes. Twelve euros fifty. ||| 0.45
-The same small number, in two currencies, on two completely different quantities of grain. Get the lot size wrong and you are not hedged, you are positioned. ||| 0.7
-Put the American ones side by side, in the same unit. ||| 0.45
-Chicago at six fifty-one and a quarter is two hundred and thirty-nine dollars a tonne. ||| 0.4
-Kansas City settled Wednesday at seven twenty and three quarters. Two hundred and sixty-five dollars a tonne. ||| 0.5
-So about sixty-eight cents a bushel, twenty-six dollars a tonne, of Kansas City over Chicago. ||| 0.45
-That spread is not a mispricing. It is the price of two protein points and a different set of customers. ||| 0.5
-When it widens, bread wheat is getting scarce. When it collapses, the export bid has gone somewhere else. ||| 0.75
-Now the hole in the middle of the map. ||| 0.45
-Russia is the largest wheat exporter in the world. ||| 0.4
-Russia has no wheat futures contract that the world trades. ||| 0.7
-Black Sea wheat is priced by assessment. ||| 0.4
-Agencies call brokers and exporters every day, take the bids, the offers and the trades that actually happened, and publish one number. ||| 0.5
-That number is what a Russian F O B cargo settles against. ||| 0.45
-But an assessment is not a settlement. You cannot buy it. You cannot sell it. And you cannot hedge on it. ||| 0.7
-So what do you do when you are long sixty thousand tonnes of Russian twelve and a half, and every screen available trades somebody else's wheat? ||| 0.55
-You cross-hedge. And you take on a new risk in exchange for the one you just removed. ||| 0.8
-Work it through. Sixty thousand tonnes of Russian milling wheat, bought F O B at around two hundred and twenty-four dollars a tonne in early August. ||| 0.5
-Unsold. You want the flat price off tonight. ||| 0.45
-Chicago is the wrong wheat and the wrong customers. ||| 0.4
-Matif is closer. European milling wheat sells to the same buyers, North Africa and the Middle East, out of the same tender books. ||| 0.55
-Size it. Fifty tonnes a lot, so sixty thousand tonnes is twelve hundred Matif lots. ||| 0.5
-In Chicago the same tonnage is four hundred and forty lots. Same grain, a third of the tickets. ||| 0.6
-Now let the market move. ||| 0.4
-Over three weeks, Europe rallies ten euros a tonne. At one fifteen, that is about eleven and a half dollars. ||| 0.5
-Your short hedge loses sixty thousand times eleven fifty. Six hundred and ninety-two thousand dollars. ||| 0.55
-And your Russian cargo? Sitting behind a damaged terminal, discounted to find a buyer. It gains four dollars a tonne. Two hundred and forty thousand. ||| 0.55
-Net, minus four hundred and fifty-two thousand dollars. ||| 0.5
-On a position you had called hedged. ||| 0.8
-Seven and a half dollars a tonne of slippage. That is what a cross-hedge costs when it goes wrong. ||| 0.55
-And here is the part worth taking away. ||| 0.4
-A cross-hedge protects you against the world moving. ||| 0.4
-It does not protect you against your own market moving. ||| 0.55
-An export tax in Moscow moves Russian F O B and does nothing to Paris. ||| 0.4
-A wet harvest in northern France moves Paris and does nothing to Russia. ||| 0.45
-And a strike on a loading terminal can lift the world price while the grain stuck behind that terminal gets cheaper. ||| 0.6
-Which is precisely the week the market has just had. ||| 0.55
-So the correlation you measured over two years, the number that justified the hedge in the first place, is highest on the quiet days and lowest on the day you need it. ||| 0.8
-One more leak, and it is the one people forget. ||| 0.45
-That Matif hedge settles in euros. Your cargo is priced in dollars. ||| 0.45
-Twelve hundred lots at this summer's Paris levels is something like thirteen or fourteen million euros of exposure that has nothing whatsoever to do with wheat. ||| 0.55
-Hedge the grain, and you have just bought a currency position. Hedge that too, or say out loud that you are running it. ||| 0.8
-Three things to keep. ||| 0.45
-One. Wheat is a category, not a commodity. Protein, falling number and test weight are the price. The word on the contract is only a label. ||| 0.6
-Two. Four exchanges price four different wheats. The spreads between them are information, not opportunity. Kansas City over Chicago is the price of bread-making protein, and it tells you where the export bid is. ||| 0.6
-Three. The biggest exporter on earth trades on an assessment, not a contract. So the Black Sea gets hedged with somebody else's wheat, and that hedge leaks hardest on exactly the days it is tested. ||| 0.7
-Monday, corn. Crop calendars and weather risk, and why one dry week in July outweighs a dry month in October. ||| 0.55
-The quiz is in the notes. Today's episode, plus the physical chain, plus what a merchant is actually paid for. ||| 0.5
-Soft Commodity Trading. See you Monday. ||| 0.8