@salesforce/webapp-template-app-react-sample-b2x-experimental 1.80.1 → 1.82.0

package/dist/CHANGELOG.md

@@ -3,6 +3,22 @@
 All notable changes to this project will be documented in this file.
 See [Conventional Commits](https://conventionalcommits.org) for commit guidelines.
 
+# [1.82.0](https://github.com/salesforce-experience-platform-emu/webapps/compare/v1.81.0...v1.82.0) (2026-03-09)
+
+**Note:** Version bump only for package @salesforce/webapp-template-base-sfdx-project-experimental
+
+
+
+
+
+# [1.81.0](https://github.com/salesforce-experience-platform-emu/webapps/compare/v1.80.1...v1.81.0) (2026-03-09)
+
+**Note:** Version bump only for package @salesforce/webapp-template-base-sfdx-project-experimental
+
+
+
+
+
 ## [1.80.1](https://github.com/salesforce-experience-platform-emu/webapps/compare/v1.80.0...v1.80.1) (2026-03-09)
 
 **Note:** Version bump only for package @salesforce/webapp-template-base-sfdx-project-experimental

package/dist/force-app/main/default/classes/MaintenanceRequestTriggerHandler.cls

@@ -0,0 +1,66 @@
+public with sharing class MaintenanceRequestTriggerHandler {
+
+    /**
+     * Handles before insert logic for Maintenance Request records
+     * Automatically assigns workers based on request type and updates status to Assigned
+     */
+    public static void handleBeforeInsert(List<Maintenance_Request__c> newRequests) {
+        // Map to store request type to worker type mappings
+        Map<String, String> requestTypeToWorkerType = new Map<String, String>{
+            'Plumbing' => 'Plumbing',
+            'Electrical' => 'Electrical',
+            'HVAC' => 'HVAC (Heating & Cooling)',
+            'Appliance' => 'Appliance Repair',
+            'Pest' => 'Pest Control'
+        };
+
+        // Collect unique worker types needed
+        Set<String> workerTypesNeeded = new Set<String>();
+        for (Maintenance_Request__c request : newRequests) {
+            if (request.Type__c != null && requestTypeToWorkerType.containsKey(request.Type__c)) {
+                workerTypesNeeded.add(requestTypeToWorkerType.get(request.Type__c));
+            }
+        }
+
+        // Query for available workers by type
+        Map<String, List<Maintenance_Worker__c>> workersByType = new Map<String, List<Maintenance_Worker__c>>();
+        if (!workerTypesNeeded.isEmpty()) {
+            for (Maintenance_Worker__c worker : [
+                SELECT Id, Name, Type__c, Rating__c
+                FROM Maintenance_Worker__c
+                WHERE Type__c IN :workerTypesNeeded
+                AND IsActive__c = true
+                ORDER BY Rating__c DESC NULLS LAST, Name ASC
+            ]) {
+                if (!workersByType.containsKey(worker.Type__c)) {
+                    workersByType.put(worker.Type__c, new List<Maintenance_Worker__c>());
+                }
+                workersByType.get(worker.Type__c).add(worker);
+            }
+        }
+
+        // Assign workers to requests
+        for (Maintenance_Request__c request : newRequests) {
+            // Only process requests with 'New' status (or null, since 'New' is the default)
+            if ((request.Status__c == 'New' || request.Status__c == null) &&
+                request.Type__c != null && requestTypeToWorkerType.containsKey(request.Type__c)) {
+                String workerType = requestTypeToWorkerType.get(request.Type__c);
+
+                // Check if we have available workers for this type
+                if (workersByType.containsKey(workerType) && !workersByType.get(workerType).isEmpty()) {
+                    // Assign the first available worker (highest rated)
+                    Maintenance_Worker__c assignedWorker = workersByType.get(workerType).get(0);
+                    request.Assigned_Worker__c = assignedWorker.Id;
+                    request.Status__c = 'Assigned';
+
+                    // Set scheduled date to 3 days from now
+                    request.Scheduled__c = DateTime.now().addDays(3);
+
+                    // Rotate worker to end of list for round-robin assignment
+                    workersByType.get(workerType).remove(0);
+                    workersByType.get(workerType).add(assignedWorker);
+                }
+            }
+        }
+    }
+}

package/dist/force-app/main/default/classes/MaintenanceRequestTriggerHandler.cls-meta.xml

@@ -0,0 +1,5 @@
+<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
+<ApexClass xmlns="http://soap.sforce.com/2006/04/metadata">
+    <apiVersion>65.0</apiVersion>
+    <status>Active</status>
+</ApexClass>

package/dist/force-app/main/default/classes/MaintenanceRequestTriggerHandler_Test.cls

@@ -0,0 +1,308 @@
+/**
+ * Test class for MaintenanceRequestTriggerHandler
+ * Validates automatic worker assignment, status updates to Assigned, and scheduled date setting
+ */
+@isTest
+private class MaintenanceRequestTriggerHandler_Test {
+
+    /**
+     * Setup test data for all test methods
+     */
+    @testSetup
+    static void setupTestData() {
+        // Create test maintenance workers with different specialties
+        List<Maintenance_Worker__c> workers = new List<Maintenance_Worker__c>{
+            new Maintenance_Worker__c(
+                Name = 'John Plumber',
+                Type__c = 'Plumbing',
+                IsActive__c = true,
+                Rating__c = 4.5,
+                Phone__c = '555-0001'
+            ),
+            new Maintenance_Worker__c(
+                Name = 'Jane Electrician',
+                Type__c = 'Electrical',
+                IsActive__c = true,
+                Rating__c = 4.8,
+                Phone__c = '555-0002'
+            ),
+            new Maintenance_Worker__c(
+                Name = 'Bob HVAC',
+                Type__c = 'HVAC (Heating & Cooling)',
+                IsActive__c = true,
+                Rating__c = 4.2,
+                Phone__c = '555-0003'
+            ),
+            new Maintenance_Worker__c(
+                Name = 'Alice Appliance',
+                Type__c = 'Appliance Repair',
+                IsActive__c = true,
+                Rating__c = 4.7,
+                Phone__c = '555-0004'
+            ),
+            new Maintenance_Worker__c(
+                Name = 'Charlie Pest',
+                Type__c = 'Pest Control',
+                IsActive__c = true,
+                Rating__c = 4.3,
+                Phone__c = '555-0005'
+            ),
+            new Maintenance_Worker__c(
+                Name = 'Inactive Worker',
+                Type__c = 'Plumbing',
+                IsActive__c = false,
+                Rating__c = 5.0,
+                Phone__c = '555-0006'
+            )
+        };
+        insert workers;
+    }
+
+    /**
+     * Test that plumbing requests are assigned to plumbing workers
+     */
+    @isTest
+    static void testPlumbingRequestAssignment() {
+        // Query for plumbing worker
+        Maintenance_Worker__c plumber = [SELECT Id FROM Maintenance_Worker__c WHERE Type__c = 'Plumbing' AND IsActive__c = true LIMIT 1];
+
+        Test.startTest();
+        Maintenance_Request__c request = new Maintenance_Request__c(
+            Type__c = 'Plumbing',
+            Description__c = 'Leaky faucet in bathroom',
+            Priority__c = 'Standard'
+        );
+        insert request;
+        Test.stopTest();
+
+        // Verify assignment
+        Maintenance_Request__c insertedRequest = [
+            SELECT Id, Assigned_Worker__c, Status__c, Scheduled__c, Type__c
+            FROM Maintenance_Request__c
+            WHERE Id = :request.Id
+        ];
+
+        System.assertEquals(plumber.Id, insertedRequest.Assigned_Worker__c, 'Worker should be assigned');
+        System.assertEquals('Assigned', insertedRequest.Status__c, 'Status should be Assigned');
+        System.assertNotEquals(null, insertedRequest.Scheduled__c, 'Scheduled date should be set');
+
+        // Verify scheduled date is approximately 3 days from now (within 1 minute tolerance)
+        DateTime expectedDate = DateTime.now().addDays(3);
+        Long timeDiff = Math.abs(insertedRequest.Scheduled__c.getTime() - expectedDate.getTime());
+        System.assert(timeDiff < 60000, 'Scheduled date should be 3 days from now');
+    }
+
+    /**
+     * Test that electrical requests are assigned to electrical workers
+     */
+    @isTest
+    static void testElectricalRequestAssignment() {
+        Maintenance_Worker__c electrician = [SELECT Id FROM Maintenance_Worker__c WHERE Type__c = 'Electrical' AND IsActive__c = true LIMIT 1];
+
+        Test.startTest();
+        Maintenance_Request__c request = new Maintenance_Request__c(
+            Type__c = 'Electrical',
+            Description__c = 'Outlet not working',
+            Priority__c = 'High (Same Day)'
+        );
+        insert request;
+        Test.stopTest();
+
+        Maintenance_Request__c insertedRequest = [
+            SELECT Id, Assigned_Worker__c, Status__c
+            FROM Maintenance_Request__c
+            WHERE Id = :request.Id
+        ];
+
+        System.assertEquals(electrician.Id, insertedRequest.Assigned_Worker__c, 'Electrician should be assigned');
+        System.assertEquals('Assigned', insertedRequest.Status__c, 'Status should be Assigned');
+    }
+
+    /**
+     * Test that HVAC requests are assigned to HVAC workers
+     */
+    @isTest
+    static void testHVACRequestAssignment() {
+        Maintenance_Worker__c hvacWorker = [SELECT Id FROM Maintenance_Worker__c WHERE Type__c = 'HVAC (Heating & Cooling)' AND IsActive__c = true LIMIT 1];
+
+        Test.startTest();
+        Maintenance_Request__c request = new Maintenance_Request__c(
+            Type__c = 'HVAC',
+            Description__c = 'AC not cooling',
+            Priority__c = 'High (Same Day)'
+        );
+        insert request;
+        Test.stopTest();
+
+        Maintenance_Request__c insertedRequest = [
+            SELECT Id, Assigned_Worker__c, Status__c
+            FROM Maintenance_Request__c
+            WHERE Id = :request.Id
+        ];
+
+        System.assertEquals(hvacWorker.Id, insertedRequest.Assigned_Worker__c, 'HVAC worker should be assigned');
+        System.assertEquals('Assigned', insertedRequest.Status__c, 'Status should be Assigned');
+    }
+
+    /**
+     * Test that appliance requests are assigned to appliance repair workers
+     */
+    @isTest
+    static void testApplianceRequestAssignment() {
+        Maintenance_Worker__c applianceWorker = [SELECT Id FROM Maintenance_Worker__c WHERE Type__c = 'Appliance Repair' AND IsActive__c = true LIMIT 1];
+
+        Test.startTest();
+        Maintenance_Request__c request = new Maintenance_Request__c(
+            Type__c = 'Appliance',
+            Description__c = 'Dishwasher not draining',
+            Priority__c = 'Standard'
+        );
+        insert request;
+        Test.stopTest();
+
+        Maintenance_Request__c insertedRequest = [
+            SELECT Id, Assigned_Worker__c, Status__c
+            FROM Maintenance_Request__c
+            WHERE Id = :request.Id
+        ];
+
+        System.assertEquals(applianceWorker.Id, insertedRequest.Assigned_Worker__c, 'Appliance worker should be assigned');
+        System.assertEquals('Assigned', insertedRequest.Status__c, 'Status should be Assigned');
+    }
+
+    /**
+     * Test that pest requests are assigned to pest control workers
+     */
+    @isTest
+    static void testPestRequestAssignment() {
+        Maintenance_Worker__c pestWorker = [SELECT Id FROM Maintenance_Worker__c WHERE Type__c = 'Pest Control' AND IsActive__c = true LIMIT 1];
+
+        Test.startTest();
+        Maintenance_Request__c request = new Maintenance_Request__c(
+            Type__c = 'Pest',
+            Description__c = 'Ants in kitchen',
+            Priority__c = 'Standard'
+        );
+        insert request;
+        Test.stopTest();
+
+        Maintenance_Request__c insertedRequest = [
+            SELECT Id, Assigned_Worker__c, Status__c
+            FROM Maintenance_Request__c
+            WHERE Id = :request.Id
+        ];
+
+        System.assertEquals(pestWorker.Id, insertedRequest.Assigned_Worker__c, 'Pest control worker should be assigned');
+        System.assertEquals('Assigned', insertedRequest.Status__c, 'Status should be Assigned');
+    }
+
+    /**
+     * Test bulk insert with multiple request types
+     */
+    @isTest
+    static void testBulkRequestAssignment() {
+        Test.startTest();
+        List<Maintenance_Request__c> requests = new List<Maintenance_Request__c>{
+            new Maintenance_Request__c(Type__c = 'Plumbing', Description__c = 'Leak 1', Priority__c = 'High (Same Day)'),
+            new Maintenance_Request__c(Type__c = 'Electrical', Description__c = 'Issue 1', Priority__c = 'Standard'),
+            new Maintenance_Request__c(Type__c = 'Plumbing', Description__c = 'Leak 2', Priority__c = 'Standard'),
+            new Maintenance_Request__c(Type__c = 'HVAC', Description__c = 'AC Issue', Priority__c = 'High (Same Day)'),
+            new Maintenance_Request__c(Type__c = 'Appliance', Description__c = 'Fridge Issue', Priority__c = 'Standard')
+        };
+        insert requests;
+        Test.stopTest();
+
+        List<Maintenance_Request__c> insertedRequests = [
+            SELECT Id, Assigned_Worker__c, Status__c, Type__c
+            FROM Maintenance_Request__c
+            WHERE Id IN :requests
+        ];
+
+        // Verify all requests were assigned
+        for (Maintenance_Request__c req : insertedRequests) {
+            System.assertNotEquals(null, req.Assigned_Worker__c, 'All requests should have assigned workers');
+            System.assertEquals('Assigned', req.Status__c, 'All requests should be Assigned');
+        }
+
+        System.assertEquals(5, insertedRequests.size(), 'All 5 requests should be inserted');
+    }
+
+    /**
+     * Test that requests without type are not assigned
+     */
+    @isTest
+    static void testRequestWithoutType() {
+        Test.startTest();
+        Maintenance_Request__c request = new Maintenance_Request__c(
+            Description__c = 'General maintenance',
+            Priority__c = 'Standard'
+        );
+        insert request;
+        Test.stopTest();
+
+        Maintenance_Request__c insertedRequest = [
+            SELECT Id, Assigned_Worker__c, Status__c
+            FROM Maintenance_Request__c
+            WHERE Id = :request.Id
+        ];
+
+        System.assertEquals(null, insertedRequest.Assigned_Worker__c, 'Worker should not be assigned without type');
+    }
+
+    /**
+     * Test that inactive workers are not assigned
+     */
+    @isTest
+    static void testInactiveWorkerNotAssigned() {
+        // Delete all active plumbing workers
+        delete [SELECT Id FROM Maintenance_Worker__c WHERE Type__c = 'Plumbing' AND IsActive__c = true];
+
+        Test.startTest();
+        Maintenance_Request__c request = new Maintenance_Request__c(
+            Type__c = 'Plumbing',
+            Description__c = 'Emergency leak',
+            Priority__c = 'High (Same Day)'
+        );
+        insert request;
+        Test.stopTest();
+
+        Maintenance_Request__c insertedRequest = [
+            SELECT Id, Assigned_Worker__c, Status__c
+            FROM Maintenance_Request__c
+            WHERE Id = :request.Id
+        ];
+
+        System.assertEquals(null, insertedRequest.Assigned_Worker__c, 'Inactive worker should not be assigned');
+    }
+
+    /**
+     * Test that requests with non-New status are not automatically processed
+     */
+    @isTest
+    static void testNonNewStatusNotProcessed() {
+        // Query for plumbing worker
+        Maintenance_Worker__c plumber = [SELECT Id FROM Maintenance_Worker__c WHERE Type__c = 'Plumbing' AND IsActive__c = true LIMIT 1];
+
+        Test.startTest();
+        // Create a request with status explicitly set to 'In Progress'
+        Maintenance_Request__c request = new Maintenance_Request__c(
+            Type__c = 'Plumbing',
+            Description__c = 'Manually assigned request',
+            Priority__c = 'Standard',
+            Status__c = 'In Progress'
+        );
+        insert request;
+        Test.stopTest();
+
+        // Verify the request was not processed by trigger (no worker assigned)
+        Maintenance_Request__c insertedRequest = [
+            SELECT Id, Assigned_Worker__c, Status__c, Scheduled__c
+            FROM Maintenance_Request__c
+            WHERE Id = :request.Id
+        ];
+
+        System.assertEquals(null, insertedRequest.Assigned_Worker__c, 'Worker should not be auto-assigned for non-New status');
+        System.assertEquals('In Progress', insertedRequest.Status__c, 'Status should remain as originally set');
+        System.assertEquals(null, insertedRequest.Scheduled__c, 'Scheduled date should not be set by trigger');
+    }
+}

package/dist/force-app/main/default/classes/MaintenanceRequestTriggerHandler_Test.cls-meta.xml

@@ -0,0 +1,5 @@
+<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
+<ApexClass xmlns="http://soap.sforce.com/2006/04/metadata">
+    <apiVersion>65.0</apiVersion>
+    <status>Active</status>
+</ApexClass>

package/dist/force-app/main/default/objects/Application__c/fields/Status__c.field-meta.xml

@@ -27,6 +27,11 @@
                 <default>false</default>
                 <label>Background Check</label>
             </value>
+            <value>
+                <fullName>Under Review</fullName>
+                <default>false</default>
+                <label>Under Review</label>
+            </value>
             <value>
                 <fullName>Approved</fullName>
                 <default>false</default>

package/dist/force-app/main/default/objects/Maintenance_Request__c/fields/Assigned_Worker__c.field-meta.xml

@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
+<CustomField xmlns="http://soap.sforce.com/2006/04/metadata">
+    <fullName>Assigned_Worker__c</fullName>
+    <deleteConstraint>SetNull</deleteConstraint>
+    <description>The maintenance worker assigned to handle this request</description>
+    <externalId>false</externalId>
+    <label>Assigned Worker</label>
+    <referenceTo>Maintenance_Worker__c</referenceTo>
+    <relationshipLabel>Maintenance Requests</relationshipLabel>
+    <relationshipName>Maintenance_Requests</relationshipName>
+    <required>false</required>
+    <trackHistory>true</trackHistory>
+    <trackTrending>false</trackTrending>
+    <type>Lookup</type>
+</CustomField>

package/dist/force-app/main/default/permissionsets/Property_Management_Access.permissionset-meta.xml

@@ -272,6 +272,11 @@
         <field>Maintenance_Request__c.Tenant_Home__c</field>
         <readable>true</readable>
     </fieldPermissions>
+    <fieldPermissions>
+        <editable>true</editable>
+        <field>Maintenance_Request__c.Assigned_Worker__c</field>
+        <readable>true</readable>
+    </fieldPermissions>
 
     <!-- Field Permissions: Maintenance_Worker__c -->
     <fieldPermissions>
@@ -363,12 +368,6 @@
         <readable>true</readable>
     </fieldPermissions>
 
-    <!-- Tab Visibility -->
-    <tabSettings>
-        <tab>Property__c</tab>
-        <visibility>Visible</visibility>
-    </tabSettings>
-
     <fieldPermissions>
         <editable>true</editable>
         <field>Agent__c.License_Expiry__c</field>
@@ -633,50 +632,4 @@
         <field>Tenant__c.Status__c</field>
         <readable>true</readable>
     </fieldPermissions>
-
-    <!-- Tab Settings -->
-    <tabSettings>
-        <tab>Application__c</tab>
-        <visibility>Visible</visibility>
-    </tabSettings>
-    <tabSettings>
-        <tab>KPI_Snapshot__c</tab>
-        <visibility>Visible</visibility>
-    </tabSettings>
-    <tabSettings>
-        <tab>Lease__c</tab>
-        <visibility>Visible</visibility>
-    </tabSettings>
-    <tabSettings>
-        <tab>Maintenance_Request__c</tab>
-        <visibility>Visible</visibility>
-    </tabSettings>
-    <tabSettings>
-        <tab>Maintenance_Worker__c</tab>
-        <visibility>Visible</visibility>
-    </tabSettings>
-    <tabSettings>
-        <tab>Notification__c</tab>
-        <visibility>Visible</visibility>
-    </tabSettings>
-    <tabSettings>
-        <tab>Payment__c</tab>
-        <visibility>Visible</visibility>
-    </tabSettings>
-    <tabSettings>
-        <tab>Property__c</tab>
-        <visibility>Visible</visibility>
-    </tabSettings>
-    <tabSettings>
-        <tab>Property_Owner__c</tab>
-        <visibility>Visible</visibility>
-    </tabSettings>
-    <tabSettings>
-        <tab>Property_Sale__c</tab>
-        <visibility>Visible</visibility>
-    </tabSettings>
-    <tabSettings>
-        <tab>Tenant__c</tab>
-        <visibility>Visible</visibility>
-    </tabSettings>
 </PermissionSet>

package/dist/force-app/main/default/triggers/MaintenanceRequestTrigger.trigger

@@ -0,0 +1,5 @@
+trigger MaintenanceRequestTrigger on Maintenance_Request__c (before insert) {
+    if (Trigger.isBefore && Trigger.isInsert) {
+        MaintenanceRequestTriggerHandler.handleBeforeInsert(Trigger.new);
+    }
+}

package/dist/force-app/main/default/triggers/MaintenanceRequestTrigger.trigger-meta.xml

@@ -0,0 +1,5 @@
+<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
+<ApexTrigger xmlns="http://soap.sforce.com/2006/04/metadata">
+  <apiVersion>65.0</apiVersion>
+  <status>Active</status>
+</ApexTrigger>

package/dist/force-app/main/default/webapplications/appreactsampleb2x/package.json

@@ -15,8 +15,8 @@
     "graphql:schema": "node scripts/get-graphql-schema.mjs"
   },
   "dependencies": {
-    "@salesforce/sdk-data": "^1.80.1",
-    "@salesforce/webapp-experimental": "^1.80.1",
+    "@salesforce/sdk-data": "^1.82.0",
+    "@salesforce/webapp-experimental": "^1.82.0",
     "@tailwindcss/vite": "^4.1.17",
     "@tanstack/react-form": "^1.28.4",
     "@types/leaflet": "^1.9.21",
@@ -43,7 +43,7 @@
     "@graphql-eslint/eslint-plugin": "^4.1.0",
     "@graphql-tools/utils": "^11.0.0",
     "@playwright/test": "^1.49.0",
-    "@salesforce/vite-plugin-webapp-experimental": "^1.80.1",
+    "@salesforce/vite-plugin-webapp-experimental": "^1.82.0",
     "@testing-library/jest-dom": "^6.6.3",
     "@testing-library/react": "^16.1.0",
     "@testing-library/user-event": "^14.5.2",

package/dist/force-app/main/default/webapplications/appreactsampleb2x/src/api/maintenanceRequestApi.ts

@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
  * Maintenance_Request__c: list via GraphQL, create via createRecord.
  */
 import { createRecord } from "@salesforce/webapp-experimental/api";
-import { executeGraphQL } from "./graphqlClient.js";
+import { executeGraphQL } from "./graphqlClient";
 
 const OBJECT_API_NAME = "Maintenance_Request__c";
 

package/dist/force-app/main/default/webapplications/appreactsampleb2x/src/api/propertyDetailGraphQL.ts

@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
  * GraphQL queries for Property_Listing__c detail and related Property__c data:
  * Property_Image__c, Property_Cost__c, Property_Feature__c.
  */
-import { executeGraphQL } from "./graphqlClient.js";
+import { executeGraphQL } from "./graphqlClient";
 
 // ---- Listing by Id ----
 const LISTING_QUERY = /* GraphQL */ `

package/dist/force-app/main/default/webapplications/appreactsampleb2x/src/api/propertyListingGraphQL.ts

@@ -2,12 +2,12 @@
  * Property Listing search via Salesforce GraphQL.
  * Replaces REST keyword search with uiapi.query.Property_Listing__c.
  */
-import { executeGraphQL } from "./graphqlClient.js";
+import { executeGraphQL } from "./graphqlClient";
 import type {
 	SearchResultRecord,
 	SearchResultRecordData,
 	FieldValue,
-} from "../features/global-search/types/search/searchResults.js";
+} from "../features/global-search/types/search/searchResults";
 
 const OBJECT_API_NAME = "Property_Listing__c";
 

package/dist/force-app/main/default/webapplications/appreactsampleb2x/src/components/PropertyListingCard.tsx

@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
 import { useNavigate } from "react-router";
 import { useCallback, useState } from "react";
 import { Button } from "./ui/button";
-import type { SearchResultRecordData } from "../features/global-search/types/search/searchResults.js";
+import type { SearchResultRecordData } from "../features/global-search/types/search/searchResults";
 import { Heart } from "lucide-react";
 
 function fieldDisplay(

package/dist/force-app/main/default/webapplications/appreactsampleb2x/src/hooks/usePropertyAddresses.ts

@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@
 import { useState, useEffect } from "react";
 import { fetchPropertyAddresses } from "@/api/propertyDetailGraphQL";
 import { getPropertyIdFromRecord } from "./usePropertyPrimaryImages";
-import type { SearchResultRecord } from "../features/global-search/types/search/searchResults.js";
+import type { SearchResultRecord } from "../features/global-search/types/search/searchResults";
 
 export function usePropertyAddresses(results: SearchResultRecord[]): Record<string, string> {
 	const [map, setMap] = useState<Record<string, string>>({});

package/dist/force-app/main/default/webapplications/appreactsampleb2x/src/hooks/usePropertyListingSearch.ts

@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
  */
 import { useState, useEffect, useRef, useCallback } from "react";
 import { queryPropertyListingsGraphQL } from "@/api/propertyListingGraphQL";
-import type { SearchResultRecord } from "../features/global-search/types/search/searchResults.js";
+import type { SearchResultRecord } from "../features/global-search/types/search/searchResults";
 
 export function usePropertyListingSearch(searchQuery: string, pageSize: number, pageToken: string) {
 	const [results, setResults] = useState<SearchResultRecord[]>([]);

package/dist/force-app/main/default/webapplications/appreactsampleb2x/src/hooks/usePropertyMapMarkers.ts

@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ import { useState, useEffect } from "react";
 import { fetchPropertyAddresses } from "@/api/propertyDetailGraphQL";
 import { geocodeAddress } from "@/utils/geocode";
 import { getPropertyIdFromRecord } from "./usePropertyPrimaryImages";
-import type { SearchResultRecord } from "../features/global-search/types/search/searchResults.js";
+import type { SearchResultRecord } from "../features/global-search/types/search/searchResults";
 import type { MapMarker } from "@/components/PropertyMap";
 
 function getListingName(record: {

package/dist/force-app/main/default/webapplications/appreactsampleb2x/src/hooks/usePropertyPrimaryImages.ts

@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
  */
 import { useState, useEffect } from "react";
 import { fetchPrimaryImagesByPropertyIds } from "@/api/propertyDetailGraphQL";
-import type { SearchResultRecord } from "../features/global-search/types/search/searchResults.js";
+import type { SearchResultRecord } from "../features/global-search/types/search/searchResults";
 
 export function getPropertyIdFromRecord(record: {
 	fields?: Record<string, { value?: unknown }>;

package/dist/package.json

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 {
   "name": "@salesforce/webapp-template-base-sfdx-project-experimental",
-  "version": "1.80.1",
+  "version": "1.82.0",
   "description": "Base SFDX project template",
   "private": true,
   "files": [

package/package.json

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 {
   "name": "@salesforce/webapp-template-app-react-sample-b2x-experimental",
-  "version": "1.80.1",
+  "version": "1.82.0",
   "description": "B2C sample app template with app shell",
   "license": "SEE LICENSE IN LICENSE.txt",
   "author": "",