@runchr/gstack-antigravity 0.1.0

package/gstack-origin/qa/SKILL.md.tmpl

@@ -0,0 +1,316 @@
+---
+name: qa
+version: 2.0.0
+description: |
+  Systematically QA test a web application and fix bugs found. Runs QA testing,
+  then iteratively fixes bugs in source code, committing each fix atomically and
+  re-verifying. Use when asked to "qa", "QA", "test this site", "find bugs",
+  "test and fix", or "fix what's broken".
+  Proactively suggest when the user says a feature is ready for testing
+  or asks "does this work?". Three tiers: Quick (critical/high only),
+  Standard (+ medium), Exhaustive (+ cosmetic). Produces before/after health scores,
+  fix evidence, and a ship-readiness summary. For report-only mode, use /qa-only.
+allowed-tools:
+  - Bash
+  - Read
+  - Write
+  - Edit
+  - Glob
+  - Grep
+  - AskUserQuestion
+  - WebSearch
+---
+
+{{PREAMBLE}}
+
+{{BASE_BRANCH_DETECT}}
+
+# /qa: Test → Fix → Verify
+
+You are a QA engineer AND a bug-fix engineer. Test web applications like a real user — click everything, fill every form, check every state. When you find bugs, fix them in source code with atomic commits, then re-verify. Produce a structured report with before/after evidence.
+
+## Setup
+
+**Parse the user's request for these parameters:**
+
+| Parameter | Default | Override example |
+|-----------|---------|-----------------:|
+| Target URL | (auto-detect or required) | `https://myapp.com`, `http://localhost:3000` |
+| Tier | Standard | `--quick`, `--exhaustive` |
+| Mode | full | `--regression .gstack/qa-reports/baseline.json` |
+| Output dir | `.gstack/qa-reports/` | `Output to /tmp/qa` |
+| Scope | Full app (or diff-scoped) | `Focus on the billing page` |
+| Auth | None | `Sign in to user@example.com`, `Import cookies from cookies.json` |
+
+**Tiers determine which issues get fixed:**
+- **Quick:** Fix critical + high severity only
+- **Standard:** + medium severity (default)
+- **Exhaustive:** + low/cosmetic severity
+
+**If no URL is given and you're on a feature branch:** Automatically enter **diff-aware mode** (see Modes below). This is the most common case — the user just shipped code on a branch and wants to verify it works.
+
+**Check for clean working tree:**
+
+```bash
+git status --porcelain
+```
+
+If the output is non-empty (working tree is dirty), **STOP** and use AskUserQuestion:
+
+"Your working tree has uncommitted changes. /qa needs a clean tree so each bug fix gets its own atomic commit."
+
+- A) Commit my changes — commit all current changes with a descriptive message, then start QA
+- B) Stash my changes — stash, run QA, pop the stash after
+- C) Abort — I'll clean up manually
+
+RECOMMENDATION: Choose A because uncommitted work should be preserved as a commit before QA adds its own fix commits.
+
+After the user chooses, execute their choice (commit or stash), then continue with setup.
+
+**Find the browse binary:**
+
+{{BROWSE_SETUP}}
+
+**Check test framework (bootstrap if needed):**
+
+{{TEST_BOOTSTRAP}}
+
+**Create output directories:**
+
+```bash
+mkdir -p .gstack/qa-reports/screenshots
+```
+
+---
+
+## Test Plan Context
+
+Before falling back to git diff heuristics, check for richer test plan sources:
+
+1. **Project-scoped test plans:** Check `~/.gstack/projects/` for recent `*-test-plan-*.md` files for this repo
+   ```bash
+   source <(~/.claude/skills/gstack/bin/gstack-slug 2>/dev/null)
+   ls -t ~/.gstack/projects/$SLUG/*-test-plan-*.md 2>/dev/null | head -1
+   ```
+2. **Conversation context:** Check if a prior `/plan-eng-review` or `/plan-ceo-review` produced test plan output in this conversation
+3. **Use whichever source is richer.** Fall back to git diff analysis only if neither is available.
+
+---
+
+## Phases 1-6: QA Baseline
+
+{{QA_METHODOLOGY}}
+
+Record baseline health score at end of Phase 6.
+
+---
+
+## Output Structure
+
+```
+.gstack/qa-reports/
+├── qa-report-{domain}-{YYYY-MM-DD}.md    # Structured report
+├── screenshots/
+│   ├── initial.png                        # Landing page annotated screenshot
+│   ├── issue-001-step-1.png               # Per-issue evidence
+│   ├── issue-001-result.png
+│   ├── issue-001-before.png               # Before fix (if fixed)
+│   ├── issue-001-after.png                # After fix (if fixed)
+│   └── ...
+└── baseline.json                          # For regression mode
+```
+
+Report filenames use the domain and date: `qa-report-myapp-com-2026-03-12.md`
+
+---
+
+## Phase 7: Triage
+
+Sort all discovered issues by severity, then decide which to fix based on the selected tier:
+
+- **Quick:** Fix critical + high only. Mark medium/low as "deferred."
+- **Standard:** Fix critical + high + medium. Mark low as "deferred."
+- **Exhaustive:** Fix all, including cosmetic/low severity.
+
+Mark issues that cannot be fixed from source code (e.g., third-party widget bugs, infrastructure issues) as "deferred" regardless of tier.
+
+---
+
+## Phase 8: Fix Loop
+
+For each fixable issue, in severity order:
+
+### 8a. Locate source
+
+```bash
+# Grep for error messages, component names, route definitions
+# Glob for file patterns matching the affected page
+```
+
+- Find the source file(s) responsible for the bug
+- ONLY modify files directly related to the issue
+
+### 8b. Fix
+
+- Read the source code, understand the context
+- Make the **minimal fix** — smallest change that resolves the issue
+- Do NOT refactor surrounding code, add features, or "improve" unrelated things
+
+### 8c. Commit
+
+```bash
+git add <only-changed-files>
+git commit -m "fix(qa): ISSUE-NNN — short description"
+```
+
+- One commit per fix. Never bundle multiple fixes.
+- Message format: `fix(qa): ISSUE-NNN — short description`
+
+### 8d. Re-test
+
+- Navigate back to the affected page
+- Take **before/after screenshot pair**
+- Check console for errors
+- Use `snapshot -D` to verify the change had the expected effect
+
+```bash
+$B goto <affected-url>
+$B screenshot "$REPORT_DIR/screenshots/issue-NNN-after.png"
+$B console --errors
+$B snapshot -D
+```
+
+### 8e. Classify
+
+- **verified**: re-test confirms the fix works, no new errors introduced
+- **best-effort**: fix applied but couldn't fully verify (e.g., needs auth state, external service)
+- **reverted**: regression detected → `git revert HEAD` → mark issue as "deferred"
+
+### 8e.5. Regression Test
+
+Skip if: classification is not "verified", OR the fix is purely visual/CSS with no JS behavior, OR no test framework was detected AND user declined bootstrap.
+
+**1. Study the project's existing test patterns:**
+
+Read 2-3 test files closest to the fix (same directory, same code type). Match exactly:
+- File naming, imports, assertion style, describe/it nesting, setup/teardown patterns
+The regression test must look like it was written by the same developer.
+
+**2. Trace the bug's codepath, then write a regression test:**
+
+Before writing the test, trace the data flow through the code you just fixed:
+- What input/state triggered the bug? (the exact precondition)
+- What codepath did it follow? (which branches, which function calls)
+- Where did it break? (the exact line/condition that failed)
+- What other inputs could hit the same codepath? (edge cases around the fix)
+
+The test MUST:
+- Set up the precondition that triggered the bug (the exact state that made it break)
+- Perform the action that exposed the bug
+- Assert the correct behavior (NOT "it renders" or "it doesn't throw")
+- If you found adjacent edge cases while tracing, test those too (e.g., null input, empty array, boundary value)
+- Include full attribution comment:
+  ```
+  // Regression: ISSUE-NNN — {what broke}
+  // Found by /qa on {YYYY-MM-DD}
+  // Report: .gstack/qa-reports/qa-report-{domain}-{date}.md
+  ```
+
+Test type decision:
+- Console error / JS exception / logic bug → unit or integration test
+- Broken form / API failure / data flow bug → integration test with request/response
+- Visual bug with JS behavior (broken dropdown, animation) → component test
+- Pure CSS → skip (caught by QA reruns)
+
+Generate unit tests. Mock all external dependencies (DB, API, Redis, file system).
+
+Use auto-incrementing names to avoid collisions: check existing `{name}.regression-*.test.{ext}` files, take max number + 1.
+
+**3. Run only the new test file:**
+
+```bash
+{detected test command} {new-test-file}
+```
+
+**4. Evaluate:**
+- Passes → commit: `git commit -m "test(qa): regression test for ISSUE-NNN — {desc}"`
+- Fails → fix test once. Still failing → delete test, defer.
+- Taking >2 min exploration → skip and defer.
+
+**5. WTF-likelihood exclusion:** Test commits don't count toward the heuristic.
+
+### 8f. Self-Regulation (STOP AND EVALUATE)
+
+Every 5 fixes (or after any revert), compute the WTF-likelihood:
+
+```
+WTF-LIKELIHOOD:
+  Start at 0%
+  Each revert:                +15%
+  Each fix touching >3 files: +5%
+  After fix 15:               +1% per additional fix
+  All remaining Low severity: +10%
+  Touching unrelated files:   +20%
+```
+
+**If WTF > 20%:** STOP immediately. Show the user what you've done so far. Ask whether to continue.
+
+**Hard cap: 50 fixes.** After 50 fixes, stop regardless of remaining issues.
+
+---
+
+## Phase 9: Final QA
+
+After all fixes are applied:
+
+1. Re-run QA on all affected pages
+2. Compute final health score
+3. **If final score is WORSE than baseline:** WARN prominently — something regressed
+
+---
+
+## Phase 10: Report
+
+Write the report to both local and project-scoped locations:
+
+**Local:** `.gstack/qa-reports/qa-report-{domain}-{YYYY-MM-DD}.md`
+
+**Project-scoped:** Write test outcome artifact for cross-session context:
+```bash
+source <(~/.claude/skills/gstack/bin/gstack-slug 2>/dev/null) && mkdir -p ~/.gstack/projects/$SLUG
+```
+Write to `~/.gstack/projects/{slug}/{user}-{branch}-test-outcome-{datetime}.md`
+
+**Per-issue additions** (beyond standard report template):
+- Fix Status: verified / best-effort / reverted / deferred
+- Commit SHA (if fixed)
+- Files Changed (if fixed)
+- Before/After screenshots (if fixed)
+
+**Summary section:**
+- Total issues found
+- Fixes applied (verified: X, best-effort: Y, reverted: Z)
+- Deferred issues
+- Health score delta: baseline → final
+
+**PR Summary:** Include a one-line summary suitable for PR descriptions:
+> "QA found N issues, fixed M, health score X → Y."
+
+---
+
+## Phase 11: TODOS.md Update
+
+If the repo has a `TODOS.md`:
+
+1. **New deferred bugs** → add as TODOs with severity, category, and repro steps
+2. **Fixed bugs that were in TODOS.md** → annotate with "Fixed by /qa on {branch}, {date}"
+
+---
+
+## Additional Rules (qa-specific)
+
+11. **Clean working tree required.** If dirty, use AskUserQuestion to offer commit/stash/abort before proceeding.
+12. **One commit per fix.** Never bundle multiple fixes into one commit.
+13. **Only modify tests when generating regression tests in Phase 8e.5.** Never modify CI configuration. Never modify existing tests — only create new test files.
+14. **Revert on regression.** If a fix makes things worse, `git revert HEAD` immediately.
+15. **Self-regulate.** Follow the WTF-likelihood heuristic. When in doubt, stop and ask.

package/gstack-origin/qa/references/issue-taxonomy.md

@@ -0,0 +1,85 @@
+# QA Issue Taxonomy
+
+## Severity Levels
+
+| Severity | Definition | Examples |
+|----------|------------|----------|
+| **critical** | Blocks a core workflow, causes data loss, or crashes the app | Form submit causes error page, checkout flow broken, data deleted without confirmation |
+| **high** | Major feature broken or unusable, no workaround | Search returns wrong results, file upload silently fails, auth redirect loop |
+| **medium** | Feature works but with noticeable problems, workaround exists | Slow page load (>5s), form validation missing but submit still works, layout broken on mobile only |
+| **low** | Minor cosmetic or polish issue | Typo in footer, 1px alignment issue, hover state inconsistent |
+
+## Categories
+
+### 1. Visual/UI
+- Layout breaks (overlapping elements, clipped text, horizontal scrollbar)
+- Broken or missing images
+- Incorrect z-index (elements appearing behind others)
+- Font/color inconsistencies
+- Animation glitches (jank, incomplete transitions)
+- Alignment issues (off-grid, uneven spacing)
+- Dark mode / theme issues
+
+### 2. Functional
+- Broken links (404, wrong destination)
+- Dead buttons (click does nothing)
+- Form validation (missing, wrong, bypassed)
+- Incorrect redirects
+- State not persisting (data lost on refresh, back button)
+- Race conditions (double-submit, stale data)
+- Search returning wrong or no results
+
+### 3. UX
+- Confusing navigation (no breadcrumbs, dead ends)
+- Missing loading indicators (user doesn't know something is happening)
+- Slow interactions (>500ms with no feedback)
+- Unclear error messages ("Something went wrong" with no detail)
+- No confirmation before destructive actions
+- Inconsistent interaction patterns across pages
+- Dead ends (no way back, no next action)
+
+### 4. Content
+- Typos and grammar errors
+- Outdated or incorrect text
+- Placeholder / lorem ipsum text left in
+- Truncated text (cut off without ellipsis or "more")
+- Wrong labels on buttons or form fields
+- Missing or unhelpful empty states
+
+### 5. Performance
+- Slow page loads (>3 seconds)
+- Janky scrolling (dropped frames)
+- Layout shifts (content jumping after load)
+- Excessive network requests (>50 on a single page)
+- Large unoptimized images
+- Blocking JavaScript (page unresponsive during load)
+
+### 6. Console/Errors
+- JavaScript exceptions (uncaught errors)
+- Failed network requests (4xx, 5xx)
+- Deprecation warnings (upcoming breakage)
+- CORS errors
+- Mixed content warnings (HTTP resources on HTTPS)
+- CSP violations
+
+### 7. Accessibility
+- Missing alt text on images
+- Unlabeled form inputs
+- Keyboard navigation broken (can't tab to elements)
+- Focus traps (can't escape a modal or dropdown)
+- Missing or incorrect ARIA attributes
+- Insufficient color contrast
+- Content not reachable by screen reader
+
+## Per-Page Exploration Checklist
+
+For each page visited during a QA session:
+
+1. **Visual scan** — Take annotated screenshot (`snapshot -i -a -o`). Look for layout issues, broken images, alignment.
+2. **Interactive elements** — Click every button, link, and control. Does each do what it says?
+3. **Forms** — Fill and submit. Test empty submission, invalid data, edge cases (long text, special characters).
+4. **Navigation** — Check all paths in/out. Breadcrumbs, back button, deep links, mobile menu.
+5. **States** — Check empty state, loading state, error state, full/overflow state.
+6. **Console** — Run `console --errors` after interactions. Any new JS errors or failed requests?
+7. **Responsiveness** — If relevant, check mobile and tablet viewports.
+8. **Auth boundaries** — What happens when logged out? Different user roles?

package/gstack-origin/qa/templates/qa-report-template.md

@@ -0,0 +1,126 @@
+# QA Report: {APP_NAME}
+
+| Field | Value |
+|-------|-------|
+| **Date** | {DATE} |
+| **URL** | {URL} |
+| **Branch** | {BRANCH} |
+| **Commit** | {COMMIT_SHA} ({COMMIT_DATE}) |
+| **PR** | {PR_NUMBER} ({PR_URL}) or "—" |
+| **Tier** | Quick / Standard / Exhaustive |
+| **Scope** | {SCOPE or "Full app"} |
+| **Duration** | {DURATION} |
+| **Pages visited** | {COUNT} |
+| **Screenshots** | {COUNT} |
+| **Framework** | {DETECTED or "Unknown"} |
+| **Index** | [All QA runs](./index.md) |
+
+## Health Score: {SCORE}/100
+
+| Category | Score |
+|----------|-------|
+| Console | {0-100} |
+| Links | {0-100} |
+| Visual | {0-100} |
+| Functional | {0-100} |
+| UX | {0-100} |
+| Performance | {0-100} |
+| Accessibility | {0-100} |
+
+## Top 3 Things to Fix
+
+1. **{ISSUE-NNN}: {title}** — {one-line description}
+2. **{ISSUE-NNN}: {title}** — {one-line description}
+3. **{ISSUE-NNN}: {title}** — {one-line description}
+
+## Console Health
+
+| Error | Count | First seen |
+|-------|-------|------------|
+| {error message} | {N} | {URL} |
+
+## Summary
+
+| Severity | Count |
+|----------|-------|
+| Critical | 0 |
+| High | 0 |
+| Medium | 0 |
+| Low | 0 |
+| **Total** | **0** |
+
+## Issues
+
+### ISSUE-001: {Short title}
+
+| Field | Value |
+|-------|-------|
+| **Severity** | critical / high / medium / low |
+| **Category** | visual / functional / ux / content / performance / console / accessibility |
+| **URL** | {page URL} |
+
+**Description:** {What is wrong, expected vs actual.}
+
+**Repro Steps:**
+
+1. Navigate to {URL}
+   ![Step 1](screenshots/issue-001-step-1.png)
+2. {Action}
+   ![Step 2](screenshots/issue-001-step-2.png)
+3. **Observe:** {what goes wrong}
+   ![Result](screenshots/issue-001-result.png)
+
+---
+
+## Fixes Applied (if applicable)
+
+| Issue | Fix Status | Commit | Files Changed |
+|-------|-----------|--------|---------------|
+| ISSUE-NNN | verified / best-effort / reverted / deferred | {SHA} | {files} |
+
+### Before/After Evidence
+
+#### ISSUE-NNN: {title}
+**Before:** ![Before](screenshots/issue-NNN-before.png)
+**After:** ![After](screenshots/issue-NNN-after.png)
+
+---
+
+## Regression Tests
+
+| Issue | Test File | Status | Description |
+|-------|-----------|--------|-------------|
+| ISSUE-NNN | path/to/test | committed / deferred / skipped | description |
+
+### Deferred Tests
+
+#### ISSUE-NNN: {title}
+**Precondition:** {setup state that triggers the bug}
+**Action:** {what the user does}
+**Expected:** {correct behavior}
+**Why deferred:** {reason}
+
+---
+
+## Ship Readiness
+
+| Metric | Value |
+|--------|-------|
+| Health score | {before} → {after} ({delta}) |
+| Issues found | N |
+| Fixes applied | N (verified: X, best-effort: Y, reverted: Z) |
+| Deferred | N |
+
+**PR Summary:** "QA found N issues, fixed M, health score X → Y."
+
+---
+
+## Regression (if applicable)
+
+| Metric | Baseline | Current | Delta |
+|--------|----------|---------|-------|
+| Health score | {N} | {N} | {+/-N} |
+| Issues | {N} | {N} | {+/-N} |
+
+**Fixed since baseline:** {list}
+**New since baseline:** {list}