@rqml/schema 0.1.0 → 0.1.2
This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
- package/dist/index.js +1 -1
- package/dist/index.js.map +1 -1
- package/package.json +1 -1
- package/templates/AGENTS.md +61 -22
package/package.json
CHANGED
|
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
|
|
|
1
1
|
{
|
|
2
2
|
"name": "@rqml/schema",
|
|
3
|
-
"version": "0.1.
|
|
3
|
+
"version": "0.1.2",
|
|
4
4
|
"description": "Canonical RQML XSD schemas (the single source of truth), example documents, and the AGENTS.md template, with a typed version resolver. Schema text is inlined for offline, bundler-friendly consumption.",
|
|
5
5
|
"type": "module",
|
|
6
6
|
"license": "Apache-2.0",
|
package/templates/AGENTS.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -11,7 +11,7 @@
|
|
|
11
11
|
|
|
12
12
|
---
|
|
13
13
|
|
|
14
|
-
This project uses **RQML** as the single source of truth for system intent. Familiarize yourself with the documentation at https://rqml.org/docs/user-guide/
|
|
14
|
+
This project uses **RQML** as the single source of truth for system intent. Familiarize yourself with the documentation at https://rqml.org/docs/user-guide/ and the development process at https://rqml.org/docs/development-process/
|
|
15
15
|
|
|
16
16
|
**Specification file:** Specification lives in a single .rqml file in the root of the project - convention is `requirements.rqml`. Multiple .rqml files may be employed in multirepo projects, in such cases a .rqml spec applies to everything that is higher in the project tree, unless overridden by another .rqml file.
|
|
17
17
|
|
|
@@ -20,33 +20,70 @@ The RQML XSD schema is at https://rqml.org/schema/rqml-2.1.0.xsd (insert correct
|
|
|
20
20
|
|
|
21
21
|
---
|
|
22
22
|
|
|
23
|
-
##
|
|
23
|
+
## Toolchain
|
|
24
24
|
|
|
25
|
+
The spec-first loop is enforced by the `rqml` CLI (npm: `@rqml/cli`; the `@rqml/mcp` server exposes the same engine as agent tools):
|
|
26
|
+
|
|
27
|
+
```bash
|
|
28
|
+
rqml check # deterministic gate: validation + coverage + drift (exit 0 = pass)
|
|
29
|
+
rqml status # re-anchor: spec, coverage, and drift state
|
|
30
|
+
rqml show <REQ-ID> # one requirement: statement, acceptance criteria, trace neighborhood
|
|
31
|
+
rqml impact <ID> # what is affected, transitively, if this artifact changes
|
|
32
|
+
rqml matrix # traceability matrix: status, goals, code, tests, coverage gaps
|
|
33
|
+
rqml link <REQ-ID> <path> # record an implements edge + drift baseline (--type verifiedBy for tests)
|
|
34
|
+
rqml skeleton <kind> # schema-valid snippet: req | edge | testCase | stateMachine
|
|
25
35
|
```
|
|
26
|
-
|
|
27
|
-
|
|
28
|
-
|
|
36
|
+
|
|
37
|
+
Run `rqml status` when you start a session to re-anchor on the spec. Run `rqml check` before finishing any task — it must exit 0.
|
|
38
|
+
|
|
39
|
+
---
|
|
40
|
+
|
|
41
|
+
## Core Principle: Spec-First Development
|
|
29
42
|
|
|
30
43
|
Code follows specification, not the reverse. If code and spec diverge, the spec is authoritative—update the code or negotiate a spec change with the developer.
|
|
31
44
|
|
|
45
|
+
RQML organizes work into a **five-stage process** (https://rqml.org/docs/development-process/). Each stage produces a durable artifact in version control; verification feeds back to the spec, so it is a loop:
|
|
46
|
+
|
|
47
|
+
| Stage | Task | Output |
|
|
48
|
+
|-------|------|--------|
|
|
49
|
+
| **Spec** | Capture intent as requirements | `requirements.rqml` |
|
|
50
|
+
| **Design** | Decide architecture, record decisions | ADRs in `.rqml/adr/` |
|
|
51
|
+
| **Plan** | Break work into agent-sized stages | `.rqml/plan.md` |
|
|
52
|
+
| **Code** | Implement specified behavior, keep traces current | code + tests |
|
|
53
|
+
| **Verify** | Prove coverage and catch drift | trace graph + `rqml check` |
|
|
54
|
+
|
|
55
|
+
Never skip ahead: do not implement behavior that is not specified, and do not make a significant architectural choice without recording it as an ADR.
|
|
56
|
+
|
|
32
57
|
---
|
|
33
58
|
|
|
34
59
|
## Workflow
|
|
35
60
|
|
|
36
|
-
### 1.
|
|
37
|
-
Ask clarifying questions until you understand the goal, scope, acceptance criteria, and constraints. Don't assume—capture assumptions as `<notes>` or `<issue>` elements.
|
|
38
|
-
|
|
39
|
-
### 2. Specify
|
|
40
|
-
**Never implement unspecified behavior.** Update the `.rqml` file before coding:
|
|
61
|
+
### 1. Spec
|
|
62
|
+
Ask clarifying questions until you understand the goal, scope, acceptance criteria, and constraints. Don't assume—capture assumptions as `<notes>` or `<issue>` elements. **Never implement unspecified behavior.** Update the `.rqml` file before coding:
|
|
41
63
|
- Add a `<req>` with statement and acceptance criteria
|
|
42
64
|
- Set appropriate `type`, `priority`, and `status="draft"`
|
|
43
|
-
- Get developer confirmation
|
|
65
|
+
- Get developer confirmation; only `status="approved"` requirements drive implementation
|
|
66
|
+
|
|
67
|
+
### 2. Design
|
|
68
|
+
Before building, decide *how*. Record each significant architectural decision as an **Architecture Decision Record (ADR)** in `.rqml/adr/`, following the canonical format (https://rqml.org/docs/development-process/design): `NNNN-kebab-case-slug.md`, with Status, Classification, Context, Options considered, Decision, and Consequences. A decision is ADR-worthy when there are real alternatives or the choice constrains future work; skip ADRs for low-level implementation details. ADRs are immutable once accepted—supersede, don't edit.
|
|
69
|
+
|
|
70
|
+
### 3. Plan
|
|
71
|
+
Break approved requirements into a staged implementation plan at `.rqml/plan.md`, framed for coding agents: each stage names its goal, the requirement IDs it addresses, the files it touches, and how to verify it.
|
|
44
72
|
|
|
45
|
-
###
|
|
46
|
-
|
|
73
|
+
### 4. Code (Implement)
|
|
74
|
+
Read the requirement first: `rqml show REQ-XXX`. Check blast radius before changing existing artifacts: `rqml impact REQ-XXX`. Honor the ADRs. If you discover missing requirements, stop and add them to the spec first. After implementing, record the trace link:
|
|
75
|
+
|
|
76
|
+
```bash
|
|
77
|
+
rqml link REQ-XXX src/path/to/implementation.ts
|
|
78
|
+
```
|
|
47
79
|
|
|
48
|
-
###
|
|
49
|
-
Add tests that reference requirement IDs
|
|
80
|
+
### 5. Verify
|
|
81
|
+
Add tests that reference requirement IDs, then record verification and run the gate:
|
|
82
|
+
|
|
83
|
+
```bash
|
|
84
|
+
rqml link REQ-XXX test/path/to/test.ts --type verifiedBy
|
|
85
|
+
rqml check # must exit 0 before you are done
|
|
86
|
+
```
|
|
50
87
|
|
|
51
88
|
---
|
|
52
89
|
|
|
@@ -64,10 +101,12 @@ Add tests that reference requirement IDs. Update `<trace>` section with verifica
|
|
|
64
101
|
|
|
65
102
|
| Aspect | relaxed | standard | strict | certified |
|
|
66
103
|
|--------|---------|----------|--------|-----------|
|
|
67
|
-
|
|
|
104
|
+
| Spec (elicitation) | Major features | Testable reqs | Edge cases | Formal |
|
|
68
105
|
| Spec-first | Recommended | Required | Required | Approved first |
|
|
106
|
+
| Design (ADRs) | Optional | Significant choices | All architectural choices | With approval |
|
|
107
|
+
| Plan | Optional | For multi-stage work | Required | Required |
|
|
69
108
|
| Code traces | Optional | New features | All changes | With metadata |
|
|
70
|
-
|
|
|
109
|
+
| Verify (test traces) | Optional | New reqs | All reqs | Full matrix |
|
|
71
110
|
| Ghost features | Allowed | Blocked | Blocked | Blocked |
|
|
72
111
|
|
|
73
112
|
---
|
|
@@ -80,6 +119,7 @@ For PRs and commits:
|
|
|
80
119
|
## RQML Trace Summary
|
|
81
120
|
|
|
82
121
|
**Requirements:** REQ-xxx (added/modified/implemented)
|
|
122
|
+
**Design:** ADR-xxxx — decision recorded (if any)
|
|
83
123
|
**Implementation:** `path/to/file` — what changed
|
|
84
124
|
**Verification:** `path/to/test` — what it verifies
|
|
85
125
|
**Open items:** gaps, assumptions, follow-ups
|
|
@@ -91,15 +131,14 @@ For PRs and commits:
|
|
|
91
131
|
|
|
92
132
|
The `.rqml` file must remain valid XML conforming to the version of RQML referenced in the version attribute in the spec document.
|
|
93
133
|
|
|
94
|
-
**To validate:**
|
|
134
|
+
**To validate:** Use the toolchain — it validates offline against the bundled schema and also checks referential integrity the XSD alone cannot enforce:
|
|
95
135
|
```bash
|
|
96
|
-
|
|
136
|
+
rqml validate
|
|
97
137
|
```
|
|
98
138
|
|
|
99
|
-
If
|
|
139
|
+
If the `rqml` CLI is not installed, `npx @rqml/cli validate` works without installation. As a last resort, xmllint (pre-installed on macOS/Linux) checks XSD validity only:
|
|
100
140
|
```bash
|
|
101
|
-
|
|
102
|
-
python -c "from lxml import etree; s=etree.XMLSchema(etree.parse('https://rqml.org/schema/rqml-2.1.0.xsd')); print('Valid' if s.validate(etree.parse('<rqml-file-name>')) else s.error_log)"
|
|
141
|
+
xmllint --schema https://rqml.org/schema/rqml-2.1.0.xsd <rqml-file-name> --noout
|
|
103
142
|
```
|
|
104
143
|
|
|
105
144
|
**IDE validation:** If the `.rqml` file includes `xsi:schemaLocation`, XML-aware editors (VS Code with XML extension, IntelliJ) validate automatically.
|