@rokkit/chart 1.3.14 → 1.4.0

package/dist/lib/brewing/polar.js

@@ -0,0 +1,584 @@
+/**
+ * Pure polar layout for the radar/spider geom.
+ *
+ * A radar plots one series across N named axes arranged around a circle, so — unlike
+ * a Cartesian chart, where swapping row order never changes the plot — axis ORDER is
+ * itself the encoding: adjacent axes create visual peaks and valleys that read as
+ * relationships between them. Two axes that are uncorrelated in the data can look
+ * strongly linked just because a caller happened to declare them next to each other,
+ * and the reverse is true too. So axis order has to be an analytical choice made by
+ * whoever configures the chart, not an accident of however the upstream data happened
+ * to be sorted.
+ *
+ * This module holds no Svelte state and reaches into no chart context — it is called
+ * from both the `Radar` geom (inside `Plot`) and any future sparkline-style radar, so
+ * it must stay a plain data-in/data-out transform.
+ */
+
+/**
+ * @typedef {Object} AxisSpec
+ * @property {string} key - field name in the data this axis reads from
+ * @property {string} [label] - display label; defaults to `key`
+ * @property {string} [unit] - appended to the label in parentheses for `displayLabel`
+ * @property {[number, number]} [domain] - explicit value domain; otherwise inferred later
+ * @property {number} [ticks] - number of tick rings to draw
+ * @property {string[]} [tickLabels] - custom labels for each tick ring
+ * @property {Function} [format] - value formatter for ticks/tooltips
+ * @property {number} [weight] - relative angular share of the circle; defaults to 1
+ */
+
+/**
+ * @typedef {Object} ResolvedAxis
+ * @property {string} key
+ * @property {string} label
+ * @property {string} displayLabel
+ * @property {[number, number]} [domain]
+ * @property {number} [ticks]
+ * @property {string[]} [tickLabels]
+ * @property {Function} [format]
+ * @property {number} weight
+ */
+
+/**
+ * Fills in the derived fields shared by every axis, regardless of which of the two
+ * accepted shorthand forms it started from.
+ *
+ * @param {string|AxisSpec} entry
+ * @returns {ResolvedAxis}
+ */
+function normaliseAxis(entry) {
+	const spec = typeof entry === 'string' ? { key: entry } : entry
+	const label = spec.label ?? spec.key
+	return {
+		...spec,
+		label,
+		displayLabel: spec.unit ? `${label} (${spec.unit})` : label,
+		weight: spec.weight ?? 1
+	}
+}
+
+/**
+ * Resolves the `axes` prop of a Radar chart to a normalised, ordered list.
+ *
+ * When `axes` is supplied it is the sole source of truth for both membership and
+ * order: axes it names but the data lacks are kept anyway (the geom renders an empty
+ * spoke for them — better a visible gap than a silently reshaped polygon), and data
+ * axes it doesn't name are dropped, with a dev warning, since silently adding an
+ * un-requested spoke would change the shape just as surely as silently reordering one.
+ *
+ * When `axes` is omitted entirely we fall back to first-appearance order in the data.
+ * That fallback exists so a bare `<Radar axis="metric" value="score" />` still renders
+ * something, but because radar shape is order-sensitive we warn every time it's used —
+ * the resulting order depends on incidental upstream row order, not an analytical
+ * choice, and should not be relied on for anything the caller shows to someone else.
+ *
+ * @param {(string|AxisSpec)[]|undefined} axes
+ * @param {Object[]} data
+ * @param {string} axisField - the data field naming which axis a row belongs to
+ * @returns {ResolvedAxis[]}
+ */
+export function resolveAxes(axes, data, axisField) {
+	if (!axes) {
+		const seen = new Set()
+		for (const row of data) {
+			const key = row?.[axisField]
+			if (key !== undefined && !seen.has(key)) seen.add(key)
+		}
+		// eslint-disable-next-line no-console
+		console.warn(
+			'[Radar] No `axes` prop given — falling back to first-appearance order in the data. ' +
+				'Radar shape is order-sensitive (adjacent axes read as related), so pass an explicit ' +
+				'`axes` array to make the order an analytical choice rather than an accident of row order.'
+		)
+		return [...seen].map(normaliseAxis)
+	}
+
+	const resolved = axes.map(normaliseAxis)
+
+	const declaredKeys = new Set(resolved.map((a) => a.key))
+	const dataKeys = new Set()
+	for (const row of data) {
+		const key = row?.[axisField]
+		if (key !== undefined) dataKeys.add(key)
+	}
+	const dropped = [...dataKeys].filter((key) => !declaredKeys.has(key))
+	if (dropped.length > 0) {
+		// eslint-disable-next-line no-console
+		console.warn(
+			`[Radar] Data axis(es) not named in \`axes\` were dropped: ${dropped.join(', ')}. ` +
+				'Add them to `axes` if they belong on the chart.'
+		)
+	}
+
+	return resolved
+}
+
+/**
+ * Angle in degrees for each axis — first axis at the top, proceeding clockwise.
+ *
+ * Each axis owns a wedge proportional to its weight and sits at that wedge's
+ * MIDPOINT, so the wedge is symmetric around its spoke. Midpoint placement alone
+ * would put axis 0 half a sector past the top, so axis 0's half-wedge is
+ * subtracted to rotate the whole diagram back.
+ *
+ * At equal weights this reduces exactly to -90 + i*360/n. A test asserts that for
+ * n=3..6, because an earlier draft of this formula omitted the rotation term and was
+ * off by 180/n for every n — nothing sat at the top.
+ *
+ * @param {number[]} weights - one per axis; non-positive or non-finite treated as 1
+ * @returns {number[]} degrees, -90 = top
+ */
+export function anglesFor(weights) {
+	const w = weights.map((x) => (Number.isFinite(x) && x > 0 ? x : 1))
+	const total = w.reduce((a, b) => a + b, 0)
+	if (!total) return []
+	const half0 = w[0] / 2
+	let before = 0
+	return w.map((wi) => {
+		const angle = -90 + (360 * (before + wi / 2 - half0)) / total
+		before += wi
+		return angle
+	})
+}
+
+/**
+ * Value domain per axis for a radar/spider chart.
+ *
+ * A radar's most-cited honesty problem is that per-axis domains are usually INFERRED from
+ * whichever rows happen to be present: filter a comparator series out of `data` and every
+ * remaining series' radius moves, because the domain that normalises it just shrank — the
+ * rendered shape becomes a property of the query, not of the entity being plotted. A
+ * DECLARED `AxisSpec.domain` fixes this by being used verbatim regardless of which rows are
+ * in `data`, so removing a comparator moves nothing. That is why declaring `domain` is the
+ * documented recommendation rather than an advanced option — this module's spec asserts the
+ * stability directly: the same series computes identical domains with and without a
+ * much-larger comparator series under a declared domain, and DIFFERENT domains under an
+ * inferred one, so the distinction is provably real rather than assumed.
+ *
+ * Inferred domains (no declared `domain`) are `[0, max]` for non-negative data. An axis whose
+ * values include a negative infers `[min, max]` instead of clamping the low end to 0 —
+ * clamping would silently delete the part of the shape that dips below centre, which is a
+ * worse failure than an occasionally-asymmetric domain. Non-finite values (a stray string, a
+ * missing field) are filtered out of the min/max computation entirely, so they cannot poison
+ * a domain to `NaN`.
+ *
+ * `opts.sharedDomain` collapses every undeclared axis onto one `[min, max]` computed across
+ * ALL axes' values (still applying the negatives-extend rule globally, so one negative
+ * anywhere widens every shared-mode axis down), for callers who want one consistent scale
+ * across mixed axes instead of a per-axis one. A declared `domain` still wins per-axis even
+ * when `sharedDomain` is on — declaring an axis is a stronger, more specific statement than a
+ * chart-wide default.
+ *
+ * An axis with no data at all (named in `axes` but absent from every row) gets the finite,
+ * degenerate domain `[0, 0]` rather than `NaN` — enough for a caller to render an empty spoke
+ * without the radius math blowing up.
+ *
+ * @param {ResolvedAxis[]} axes
+ * @param {Object[]} data
+ * @param {{ x: string, y: string }} channels - `x` names the axis field, `y` the value field
+ * @param {{ sharedDomain?: boolean }} [opts]
+ * @returns {[number, number][]} one domain per axis, positionally aligned with `axes`
+ */
+export function domainsFor(axes, data, channels, opts = {}) {
+	const { x: axisField, y: valueField } = channels
+	const sharedDomain = opts.sharedDomain ?? false
+
+	const valuesByKey = new Map(axes.map((axis) => [axis.key, []]))
+	for (const row of data) {
+		const values = valuesByKey.get(row?.[axisField])
+		if (!values) continue
+		const value = row?.[valueField]
+		if (Number.isFinite(value)) values.push(value)
+	}
+
+	const infer = (values) => {
+		if (values.length === 0) return [0, 0]
+		const min = Math.min(...values)
+		const max = Math.max(...values)
+		return min < 0 ? [min, max] : [0, max]
+	}
+
+	const shared = sharedDomain ? infer([...valuesByKey.values()].flat()) : null
+
+	return axes.map((axis) => axis.domain ?? shared ?? infer(valuesByKey.get(axis.key)))
+}
+
+/**
+ * Maps a value to a radius, in pixels, for one axis of a radar/spider chart.
+ *
+ * The centre is `domain.min`, NOT zero: on a domain of `[-5, 10]` with `R = 100`, a value of 0
+ * sits at `R * 5/15 ≈ 33.33`, not at the centre. Centring on 0 unconditionally would silently
+ * misplace every axis whose domain doesn't start at zero — this follows `domainsFor`'s own
+ * inferred-negative-domain rule (`[min, max]`, never clamped to 0): whatever `domainsFor` decided
+ * an axis's low end is, THAT is the value drawn at the centre, not literal zero.
+ *
+ * `transform` is `'linear'` (`R * ratio`) or `'sqrt'` (`R * sqrt(ratio)`) — see
+ * `resolveRadiusTransform` for why a caller would ever want the latter. Anything other than the
+ * literal string `'sqrt'` is treated as `'linear'`.
+ *
+ * Two failure modes are handled explicitly rather than left to produce `NaN`:
+ *
+ * - A zero-width domain (`min === max`, e.g. the `[0, 0]` `domainsFor` returns for an axis
+ *   absent from every row) would divide by zero. Rather than `NaN`, it resolves to `0` — the
+ *   centre — continuing the promise `domainsFor`'s own doc comment already makes for that case:
+ *   "enough for a caller to render an empty spoke without the radius math blowing up."
+ * - A non-finite `value` (missing field, a stray string that slipped past upstream filtering)
+ *   returns `null` rather than being coerced to some position. Plotting it anyway — at the
+ *   centre, say — would silently reshape the polygon exactly the way `resolveAxes` already
+ *   refuses to do for axis membership ("better a visible gap than a silently reshaped polygon").
+ *   The geom is expected to break the line at a `null` vertex rather than draw a false one.
+ *
+ * A finite value outside `[min, max]` is clamped into `[0, R]` rather than left to overshoot the
+ * ring (linear) or hand a negative ratio to `sqrt`, which has no real root and would produce
+ * `NaN`. `domainsFor` treats an out-of-domain value as "the caller/renderer problem, not
+ * domainsFor's" — `radiusFor` *is* that renderer, so this is where the clamp belongs.
+ *
+ * @param {number} value
+ * @param {[number, number]} domain
+ * @param {number} R - outer radius in pixels
+ * @param {'linear'|'sqrt'} transform
+ * @returns {number|null} radius in pixels, or `null` for a non-finite value
+ */
+export function radiusFor(value, domain, R, transform) {
+	if (!Number.isFinite(value)) return null
+
+	const [min, max] = domain
+	const span = max - min
+	if (span === 0) return 0
+
+	let ratio = (value - min) / span
+	if (ratio < 0) ratio = 0
+	else if (ratio > 1) ratio = 1
+
+	return transform === 'sqrt' ? R * Math.sqrt(ratio) : R * ratio
+}
+
+/**
+ * Picks the radius transform for a radar chart, given its axis weights.
+ *
+ * A wedge's area is ~½θr². `anglesFor` already makes θ (a wedge's angular width) proportional to
+ * weight for a weighted radar. If radius stayed linear in value, a heavily-weighted axis would get
+ * both a wider wedge AND a radius growing at the ordinary linear rate for the same value — the two
+ * compound, so swept area grows faster than `weight × value`, stacking on top of radar's already
+ * well-known area exaggeration (a 2x difference in a linear radius already reads as ~4x in swept
+ * area). Making radius track `√value` cancels exactly one factor of that compounding: with
+ * `r² ∝ value`, area becomes `∝ θ * value ∝ weight * value` — the honest claim a weighted radar is
+ * making about its data in the first place. (This module's spec asserts that proportionality
+ * numerically rather than arguing it, since it is the entire reason this branch exists.)
+ *
+ * At equal weights every wedge is the same width regardless of transform, so there is nothing to
+ * compensate for — `'linear'` is used, matching conventional radar (whose area exaggeration is a
+ * documented, accepted limitation, not something this module tries to fix).
+ *
+ * `requested` lets a caller pin the transform explicitly; an explicit `'linear'` or `'sqrt'`
+ * always wins over the weight-derived choice, so a consumer who has deliberately chosen one never
+ * has it silently swapped out from under them the next time someone adds an unequal weight to the
+ * axes list.
+ *
+ * Weights are normalised the same way `anglesFor` normalises them (non-positive or non-finite
+ * treated as 1) before the equality check, so this function's answer always matches the wedges
+ * `anglesFor` actually draws for the same `weights` array.
+ *
+ * @param {number[]} weights - one per axis, the same array `anglesFor` would receive
+ * @param {'linear'|'sqrt'|'auto'} [requested] - defaults to `'auto'`
+ * @returns {'linear'|'sqrt'}
+ */
+export function resolveRadiusTransform(weights, requested = 'auto') {
+	if (requested === 'linear' || requested === 'sqrt') return requested
+
+	const w = weights.map((x) => (Number.isFinite(x) && x > 0 ? x : 1))
+	const allEqual = w.every((x) => x === w[0])
+	return allEqual ? 'linear' : 'sqrt'
+}
+
+/**
+ * @typedef {Object} Vertex
+ * @property {string} axisKey - the axis this vertex belongs to
+ * @property {number} value - the plotted value; the average when the `(series, axis)` cell had
+ *   more than one row
+ * @property {number} angle - degrees, taken from `angles` at this axis's position
+ * @property {number} radius - pixels, from `radiusFor`; never `null` here because `value` is
+ *   always finite by construction (non-finite readings are filtered out before averaging)
+ * @property {Record<string, unknown>} row - one of the original rows for this cell, chosen so `===` identity with
+ *   the container's `data` array survives averaging
+ */
+
+/**
+ * Turns rows into one polygon's worth of vertices per series, positionally aligned with `axes`.
+ *
+ * A row belongs to the `(series, axis)` cell identified by `channels.color` (or the single
+ * implicit series `undefined`, when no series channel is given at all) crossed with
+ * `channels.x`. Two situations a naive per-cell lookup would mishandle are resolved explicitly,
+ * for reasons that matter more than they look like they should:
+ *
+ * DUPLICATE cells — more than one row landing on the same `(series, axis)` pair — are averaged
+ * HERE, inside this module, rather than by routing through the generic `stat`/`applyGeomStat`
+ * machinery the rest of the package uses for aggregation. `applyGeomStat` calls
+ * `groupDataByKeys`, which builds a FRESH row object containing only the group-by keys plus the
+ * summarised value — a new allocation that fails `===` identity against anything in the
+ * container's `data` array. Every geom in this package computes its `onselect` index as
+ * `plotState.data.indexOf(row)`, so an aggregated row would report `index: -1` and silently drop
+ * every field that wasn't a channel. That is not a rare edge case for radar: long-format
+ * `(series × axis)` data duplicating a cell is the single most common data-shape mistake a radar
+ * consumer will make, so aggregation cannot be allowed to degrade interactivity the way a generic
+ * stat would. The fix: average the values, but keep a reference to one of the ORIGINAL row
+ * objects (the first one encountered) as the vertex's `row`, so identity survives. A repeated
+ * `(series, axis)` pair also `console.warn`s in dev, matching this file's existing warn
+ * register — axis is a small, fixed enum rather than a repeated-measurement field, so a duplicate
+ * is almost always a mistake rather than intentional multiple sampling.
+ *
+ * MISSING cells — a `(series, axis)` pair with no matching row at all, or one whose only
+ * matching row(s) all have a non-finite value — resolve to `null`, never to a value of `0`. Zero
+ * is a real, meaningful position on almost every axis (the centre, per `radiusFor`'s own
+ * contract), so defaulting a gap to it would silently invent a score and render as a real low
+ * value rather than as missing data — the same "better a visible gap than a silently reshaped
+ * polygon" principle `resolveAxes` already applies to axis membership. The geom is expected to
+ * break the polygon's outline at a `null` vertex instead of drawing a line through it.
+ *
+ * @param {Object[]} data
+ * @param {ResolvedAxis[]} axes - from `resolveAxes`; vertex order follows this array
+ * @param {number[]} angles - from `anglesFor(axes.map(a => a.weight))`, aligned with `axes`
+ * @param {[number, number][]} domains - from `domainsFor`, aligned with `axes`
+ * @param {number} R - outer radius in pixels, forwarded to `radiusFor`
+ * @param {'linear'|'sqrt'} transform - forwarded to `radiusFor`
+ * @param {{ x: string, y: string, color?: string }} channels - `x` names the axis field, `y` the
+ *   value field, `color` the series field — mirroring `fill ?? color`'s role as the series
+ *   channel in every other geom. Omitting it entirely means one implicit series.
+ * @returns {Map<unknown, (Vertex|null)[]>} one entry per distinct series value (or the single key
+ *   `undefined` when `channels.color` is omitted), each holding one vertex — or `null` for a
+ *   gap — per axis, in `axes` order
+ */
+export function verticesFor(data, axes, angles, domains, R, transform, channels) {
+	const { x: axisField, y: valueField, color: seriesField } = channels
+
+	const cells = new Map()
+	for (const row of data) {
+		const seriesKey = seriesField !== undefined ? row?.[seriesField] : undefined
+		const axisKey = row?.[axisField]
+		if (!cells.has(seriesKey)) cells.set(seriesKey, new Map())
+		const bySeries = cells.get(seriesKey)
+		if (!bySeries.has(axisKey)) bySeries.set(axisKey, [])
+		bySeries.get(axisKey).push(row)
+	}
+
+	const result = new Map()
+	for (const [seriesKey, bySeries] of cells) {
+		const vertices = axes.map((axis, i) => {
+			const rows = bySeries.get(axis.key)
+			if (!rows) return null
+
+			if (rows.length > 1) {
+				// eslint-disable-next-line no-console
+				console.warn(
+					`[Radar] Duplicate (series, axis) cell — axis "${axis.key}"` +
+						`${seriesKey !== undefined ? `, series "${seriesKey}"` : ''} has ${rows.length} rows; ` +
+						'averaging their values. A repeated (series, axis) pair is almost always a data bug, ' +
+						'since axis is a small fixed enum rather than a repeated-measurement field.'
+				)
+			}
+
+			const values = rows.map((row) => row[valueField]).filter(Number.isFinite)
+			if (values.length === 0) return null
+
+			const value = values.reduce((a, b) => a + b, 0) / values.length
+			return {
+				axisKey: axis.key,
+				value,
+				angle: angles[i],
+				radius: radiusFor(value, domains[i], R, transform),
+				row: rows[0]
+			}
+		})
+		result.set(seriesKey, vertices)
+	}
+
+	return result
+}
+
+/**
+ * @typedef {Object} Ring
+ * @property {number} radius - pixels from centre
+ * @property {(string|number)[]} labels - one label per axis, positionally aligned with `axes`
+ */
+
+/**
+ * How many concentric rings the shared grid draws, and why it can only ever be one number
+ * for the whole chart rather than one per axis.
+ *
+ * @param {ResolvedAxis[]} axes
+ * @param {number} fallbackRings
+ * @returns {number}
+ */
+function resolveRingCount(axes, fallbackRings) {
+	const ticks = axes.map((axis) => axis.ticks)
+	// Vacuously false when axes is empty, which is what we want: nothing to agree on, so fall
+	// through to the fallback rather than reading `ticks[0]` off an empty array.
+	const uniform = axes.length > 0 && ticks.every((t) => t !== undefined && t === ticks[0])
+	if (uniform) return ticks[0]
+
+	if (ticks.some((t) => t !== undefined)) {
+		// eslint-disable-next-line no-console
+		console.warn(
+			'[Radar] AxisSpec.ticks differ across axes — falling back to `opts.rings` ' +
+				`(${fallbackRings}) for the shared grid. The geom draws ONE grid, common to every ` +
+				'spoke, so per-spoke ring counts cannot be honoured; declare the same `ticks` on ' +
+				'every axis if a ring is meant to read as "k of n" everywhere.'
+		)
+	}
+	return fallbackRings
+}
+
+/**
+ * Inverts `radiusFor` to answer "what value does ring `ratio` (a fraction of R) sit at, on
+ * THIS axis's domain and transform?" — needed because rings are laid out evenly in RADIUS
+ * (see `ringsFor`), so the value a given ring represents depends on the axis's domain and,
+ * under `sqrt`, on the transform too: `radius = R * sqrt(ratio)` inverts to `valueRatio =
+ * ratio^2`, not `ratio` itself.
+ *
+ * @param {number} ratio - `i / ringCount`, the SAME fraction of R every ring uses
+ * @param {[number, number]} domain
+ * @param {'linear'|'sqrt'} transform
+ * @returns {number}
+ */
+function valueAtRing(ratio, domain, transform) {
+	const [min, max] = domain
+	const valueRatio = transform === 'sqrt' ? ratio ** 2 : ratio
+	return min + valueRatio * (max - min)
+}
+
+/**
+ * Concentric grid rings for a radar chart — one shared set of circles, evenly spaced in
+ * RADIUS, that every spoke is drawn against.
+ *
+ * Ring *i* sits at `(i / ringCount) * R`. This follows directly from `radiusFor`'s own linear
+ * mapping between radius and normalised position: since every spoke shares one `R` and the
+ * grid is one set of concentric circles (not one grid per axis), the only spacing that keeps
+ * "ring 2 is twice as far out as ring 1" true on EVERY spoke simultaneously is spacing by
+ * radius. Spacing the rings evenly in VALUE instead would only coincide with this for a
+ * domain that starts at 0 (see the spec: a `[20, 120]`-style domain exposes the divergence,
+ * because splitting an unanchored domain into equal value steps and converting each through
+ * `radiusFor` on ITS OWN axis does not reduce to `(i/ringCount) * R` the way it would for a
+ * zero-anchored domain).
+ *
+ * Ring COUNT has to be one number for the whole grid, because there is only one grid, drawn
+ * once. When every `AxisSpec` declares the same `ticks`, that count is used verbatim and ring
+ * *k* genuinely means "k of n" on every spoke. When they disagree, honouring any one axis's
+ * count would silently mislabel every other axis's rings, so this falls back to `opts.rings`
+ * (default 4) and warns — the geom cannot draw a different number of rings per spoke.
+ *
+ * Ring LABELS are resolved per axis (each ring has one label per axis, since the same radius
+ * means a different value on each spoke): a declared `tickLabels` entry wins outright — it is
+ * the ordinal vocabulary of a Likert-style axis and has no "value" to compute at all. Absent
+ * that, the ring's value on that axis (via `valueAtRing`) is run through the axis's `format`
+ * if one is given, else left as the bare number. A DECLARED domain makes this value a stable,
+ * meaningful tick; an INFERRED one (no `domain` supplied anywhere for this axis) makes it only
+ * an approximation of "if the current rows were the whole story."
+ *
+ * @param {ResolvedAxis[]} axes
+ * @param {{ R: number, rings?: number, domains?: [number, number][], transform?: 'linear'|'sqrt' }} opts
+ * @returns {Ring[]}
+ */
+export function ringsFor(axes, opts = {}) {
+	const { R, rings: fallbackRings = 4, domains, transform = 'linear' } = opts
+	const ringCount = resolveRingCount(axes, fallbackRings)
+
+	return Array.from({ length: ringCount }, (_, idx) => {
+		const i = idx + 1
+		const radius = (i / ringCount) * R
+		const labels = axes.map((axis, axisIndex) => {
+			if (Array.isArray(axis.tickLabels) && axis.tickLabels[idx] !== undefined) {
+				return axis.tickLabels[idx]
+			}
+			const domain = domains?.[axisIndex] ?? axis.domain ?? [0, 0]
+			const value = valueAtRing(i / ringCount, domain, transform)
+			return typeof axis.format === 'function' ? axis.format(value) : value
+		})
+		return { radius, labels }
+	})
+}
+
+/**
+ * Zero-reference marker, per axis — a dashed ring segment (in the geom, not here) at the
+ * radius where the value 0 actually sits on that spoke.
+ *
+ * `radiusFor` centres each spoke on `domain.min`, not on 0, because `domainsFor` lets a
+ * negative value extend a domain rather than clamping it. That is honest about the data but
+ * has a real cost: the hub means a DIFFERENT value on every spoke whose domain doesn't start
+ * at 0, so a reader has no way to tell where "nothing" is just by looking at the centre. An
+ * all-zeros row would then bow OUTWARD to wherever 0 lands on each axis instead of collapsing
+ * to a point at the centre — the opposite of how a radar's most basic case is meant to read.
+ *
+ * So: any axis whose domain CONTAINS zero (`min <= 0 <= max`) but does not START there
+ * (`min !== 0`) gets a marker at `radiusFor(0, domain, R, transform)`. Two axes need none:
+ *
+ * - `min === 0` — the hub already is zero, nothing to mark.
+ * - the domain EXCLUDES zero entirely (`min > 0` or `max < 0`) — there is no honest position
+ *   for "zero" ON this spoke at all. `radiusFor` would clamp value `0` to whichever end of
+ *   `[0, R]` is nearest, which is exactly the position `domain.min` already occupies — drawing
+ *   a "this is zero" marker there would misrepresent `domain.min` as zero, which is worse than
+ *   drawing nothing. This module returns `null` for that case rather than a clamped radius.
+ *
+ * @param {ResolvedAxis[]} axes
+ * @param {[number, number][]} domains - aligned with `axes`, from `domainsFor`
+ * @param {number} R
+ * @param {'linear'|'sqrt'} transform
+ * @returns {(number|null)[]} one entry per axis, positionally aligned with `axes`
+ */
+export function zeroRingFor(axes, domains, R, transform) {
+	return axes.map((_, i) => {
+		const [min, max] = domains[i]
+		const containsZero = min <= 0 && max >= 0
+		return containsZero && min !== 0 ? radiusFor(0, domains[i], R, transform) : null
+	})
+}
+
+/**
+ * @typedef {Object} RadarLayout
+ * @property {ResolvedAxis[]} axes
+ * @property {number[]} angles - from `anglesFor`, aligned with `axes`
+ * @property {[number, number][]} domains - from `domainsFor`, aligned with `axes`
+ * @property {Map<unknown, (import('./polar.js').Vertex|null)[]>} series - from `verticesFor`
+ * @property {Ring[]} rings - from `ringsFor`
+ * @property {(number|null)[]} zeroRings - from `zeroRingFor`, aligned with `axes`
+ * @property {number} radius - the outer radius, `R`, every other measurement is relative to
+ * @property {'linear'|'sqrt'} transform - resolved via `resolveRadiusTransform`
+ */
+
+/**
+ * Composes every piece of this module into the one call a `Radar` geom actually needs — the
+ * public entry point, and the reason the rest of the module is allowed to stay a set of small,
+ * separately-testable functions instead of one large one.
+ *
+ * This function makes the ordering dependency between those functions explicit, because it is
+ * real, not incidental: `axes` must exist before weights can be read off it for `anglesFor`/
+ * `resolveRadiusTransform`; domains must exist before `verticesFor` (which places vertices) or
+ * `zeroRingFor` (which needs to know each axis's centre) can run; and the resolved `transform`
+ * must be shared between `verticesFor` and `ringsFor`/`zeroRingFor` so a ring drawn at "80% of
+ * R" and a vertex plotted at "80% of R" agree on what value that actually represents.
+ *
+ * `channels` follows the same `{ x, y, color? }` convention as `domainsFor`/`verticesFor` — `x`
+ * names the axis field, `y` the value field, `color` the series field. `opts.axes` is the
+ * `Radar` component's own `axes` prop (bare strings, full `AxisSpec`s, or a mix — see
+ * `resolveAxes`); `opts.R` defaults to `100` so this function is independently callable (by
+ * tests, tooling, anything that isn't a geom mid-render) without having to invent a pixel
+ * radius — a real `Radar.svelte` is expected to pass its actual computed outer radius instead.
+ *
+ * @param {Object[]} data
+ * @param {{ x: string, y: string, color?: string }} channels
+ * @param {{ axes?: (string|AxisSpec)[], sharedDomain?: boolean, rings?: number,
+ *   radiusScale?: 'linear'|'sqrt'|'auto', R?: number }} [opts]
+ * @returns {RadarLayout}
+ */
+export function buildRadarLayout(data, channels, opts = {}) {
+	const R = opts.R ?? 100
+	const axes = resolveAxes(opts.axes, data, channels.x)
+	const weights = axes.map((axis) => axis.weight)
+	const angles = anglesFor(weights)
+	const domains = domainsFor(axes, data, channels, { sharedDomain: opts.sharedDomain })
+	const transform = resolveRadiusTransform(weights, opts.radiusScale)
+	const series = verticesFor(data, axes, angles, domains, R, transform, channels)
+	const rings = ringsFor(axes, { R, rings: opts.rings, domains, transform })
+	const zeroRings = zeroRingFor(axes, domains, R, transform)
+
+	return { axes, angles, domains, series, rings, zeroRings, radius: R, transform }
+}

package/dist/lib/plot/scales.js

@@ -42,10 +42,10 @@ export function buildUnifiedXScale(datasets, field, width, opts = {}) {
 		const numericValues = allValues.map(Number)
 		const [minVal, maxVal] = extent(numericValues)
 		const domainMin = (opts.includeZero ?? false) ? 0 : (minVal ?? 0)
-		return scaleLinear()
-			.domain([domainMin, maxVal ?? 0])
-			.range(range)
-			.nice()
+		const s = scaleLinear().domain([domainMin, maxVal ?? 0]).range(range)
+		// Same opts.nice escape hatch as the opts.domain branch above (e.g. a spark's x-axis,
+		// which must span the full width edge-to-edge, not stop short at a rounded tick).
+		return opts.nice === false ? s : s.nice()
 	}
 
 	const domain = [...new Set(allValues)].filter((v) => v !== null && v !== undefined)
@@ -58,7 +58,10 @@ export function buildUnifiedXScale(datasets, field, width, opts = {}) {
 export function buildUnifiedYScale(datasets, field, height, opts = {}) {
 	const yrange = opts.range ?? [height, 0]
 	if (opts.domain) {
-		return scaleLinear().domain(opts.domain).range(yrange).nice()
+		const s = scaleLinear().domain(opts.domain).range(yrange)
+		// nice() pads the domain outward to round numbers — wrong for a caller (e.g. a spark)
+		// whose domain is already the exact value it wants rendered edge-to-edge.
+		return opts.nice === false ? s : s.nice()
 	}
 	const rawValues = datasets.flatMap((d) => d.map((r) => r[field])).filter((v) => v !== null && v !== undefined)
 	const isNumeric = rawValues.length > 0 && rawValues.every(

package/dist/lib/plot/types.d.ts

@@ -33,6 +33,7 @@ export type PlotSpec = {
     xLabel?: string | undefined;
     yLabel?: string | undefined;
     axisOrigin?: [number, number] | undefined;
+    axisOffset?: number | undefined;
     colorScale?: "categorical" | "sequential" | "diverging" | undefined;
     colorScheme?: string | undefined;
     colorMidpoint?: number | undefined;

package/dist/lib/plot/types.js

@@ -33,6 +33,7 @@
  * @property {string} [xLabel]
  * @property {string} [yLabel]
  * @property {[number, number]} [axisOrigin]
+ * @property {number} [axisOffset]
  * @property {'categorical'|'sequential'|'diverging'} [colorScale]
  * @property {string} [colorScheme]
  * @property {number} [colorMidpoint]

package/dist/lib/preset.d.ts

@@ -34,6 +34,7 @@ export namespace defaultPreset {
         let ribbon: number;
         let waterfall: number;
         let rule: number;
+        let radar: number;
     }
     let patterns: string[];
     let symbols: string[];

package/dist/lib/preset.js

@@ -23,7 +23,8 @@ export const defaultPreset = {
     hexbin:      1,
     ribbon:      0.5,
     waterfall:   1,
-    rule:        1
+    rule:        1,
+    radar:       0.25
   },
   patterns: ['diagonal', 'dots', 'triangles', 'hatch', 'lattice', 'swell',
              'checkerboard', 'waves', 'petals', 'brick', 'diamonds', 'tile',

package/dist/lib/select.d.ts

@@ -3,20 +3,20 @@
  * @param {Record<string, unknown>} datum
  * @param {number} index  index within the geom's rendered data
  * @param {{ x?: string, y?: string }} channels
- * @param {'line'|'point'|'area'|'bar'} geom
+ * @param {'line'|'point'|'area'|'bar'|'radar'} geom
  * @param {unknown} series  color/group value, or undefined
  * @param {MouseEvent|KeyboardEvent} event
  */
 export function buildSelectDetail(datum: Record<string, unknown>, index: number, channels: {
     x?: string;
     y?: string;
-}, geom: "line" | "point" | "area" | "bar", series: unknown, event: MouseEvent | KeyboardEvent): {
+}, geom: "line" | "point" | "area" | "bar" | "radar", series: unknown, event: MouseEvent | KeyboardEvent): {
     datum: Record<string, unknown>;
     index: number;
     series: {} | undefined;
     value: unknown;
     x: unknown;
     y: unknown;
-    geom: "bar" | "line" | "area" | "point";
+    geom: "bar" | "line" | "area" | "point" | "radar";
     event: MouseEvent | KeyboardEvent;
 };