@robbiesrobotics/alice-agents 1.5.10 → 1.5.13

package/templates/workspaces/olivia/skills/in-depth-research/methodology.md

@@ -1,75 +0,0 @@
-# Research Methodology
-
-Techniques for systematic investigation. Load when planning or executing research.
-
-## Search Strategy
-
-### Start Broad
-- General search engines (Google, Bing, DuckDuckGo)
-- Wikipedia for orientation (then follow citations)
-- Overview articles to map the territory
-
-### Go Specific
-- Domain-specific databases (PubMed, arXiv, SSRN, etc.)
-- Industry reports and whitepapers
-- Expert blogs and publications
-- Academic papers via Google Scholar
-
-### Alternative Vectors
-- **Reverse search**: Find who cites key papers
-- **Author search**: Other work by credible authors
-- **Forum mining**: Reddit, HN, Stack Exchange for practitioner knowledge
-- **Social search**: Twitter/X threads from experts
-- **News archives**: Historical coverage and evolution
-
-### Query Techniques
-- Boolean operators (AND, OR, NOT, "exact phrase")
-- Site-specific: `site:nature.com`, `site:gov`
-- Filetype: `filetype:pdf` for papers
-- Date ranges for recency
-- Synonym expansion (try multiple phrasings)
-
-## Source Triangulation
-
-Never rely on single source for important claims:
-- Find 3+ independent sources for key facts
-- Check if sources cite each other (not truly independent)
-- Look for primary source behind secondary reports
-
-## Following Trails
-
-When you find good source:
-1. Check its references/citations
-2. Find who cited this source (forward citation)
-3. Look at author's other work
-4. Check related papers/articles suggested
-
-## Knowing When to Stop
-
-Stop research when:
-- **Saturation**: New sources repeat what you already found
-- **Diminishing returns**: Effort >> incremental value
-- **Sufficient confidence**: Answer is clear enough for the decision
-- **Budget exhausted**: Time/effort limit reached
-
-Document why you stopped. "More research possible" is always true — note what would be gained.
-
-## Red Flags
-
-Be suspicious when:
-- Only one source makes a claim
-- Source has obvious financial interest
-- No methodology or data shown
-- Extraordinary claims, ordinary evidence
-- Consensus claimed but not demonstrated
-
-## Documentation During Research
-
-Keep running log:
-```
-[timestamp] Query: "..."
-[timestamp] Found: [source] — [key finding]
-[timestamp] Note: [observation about reliability]
-[timestamp] Gap: [what I'm not finding]
-[timestamp] Decision: [stopped because...]
-```

package/templates/workspaces/olivia/skills/in-depth-research/output-formats.md

@@ -1,168 +0,0 @@
-# Research Output Formats
-
-Templates for delivering research results. Match format to audience and purpose.
-
-## Executive Summary
-
-For decision-makers with limited time.
-
-```
-🔬 RESEARCH: [Topic]
-
-⚡ BOTTOM LINE
-[1-2 sentences: the answer]
-
-📊 CONFIDENCE: [High/Medium/Low]
-
-KEY FINDINGS
-• [Finding 1]
-• [Finding 2]  
-• [Finding 3]
-
-⚠️ MAIN CAVEAT
-[Single most important limitation]
-
-🎯 RECOMMENDATION
-[What to do with this information]
-```
-
-Length: 1 page max. No methodology details. Decision-focused.
-
-## Standard Report
-
-For most research requests.
-
-```
-🔬 DEEP RESEARCH: [Topic]
-
-## Question
-[Specific question being answered]
-
-## Answer
-[Direct answer — 2-3 sentences]
-
-## Confidence: [Level]
-[Why this confidence level]
-
-## Key Findings
-### [Theme 1]
-[Findings with source attribution]
-
-### [Theme 2]
-[Findings with source attribution]
-
-## Contradictions & Uncertainties
-[Where sources disagreed, what remains unclear]
-
-## Gaps
-[What couldn't be determined]
-
-## Sources
-[Numbered list with brief credibility notes]
-
-## Methodology Note
-[What was searched, how evaluated]
-```
-
-Length: 2-5 pages. Balanced depth.
-
-## Academic/Comprehensive
-
-For critical decisions or when methodology matters.
-
-```
-# Research Report: [Topic]
-
-## Abstract
-[Full summary of question, method, findings, conclusion]
-
-## Research Question
-[Precise formulation]
-
-## Methodology
-### Search Strategy
-[Databases searched, queries used, date ranges]
-
-### Inclusion/Exclusion Criteria
-[What sources were considered, what was excluded and why]
-
-### Evaluation Framework
-[How sources were assessed]
-
-## Findings
-### [Section by theme]
-[Detailed findings with full citations]
-
-## Analysis
-### Synthesis
-[How findings connect]
-
-### Contradictions
-[Detailed analysis of disagreements]
-
-### Confidence Assessment
-[Systematic evaluation of certainty]
-
-## Limitations
-[What this research cannot answer]
-
-## Conclusion
-[Final answer with appropriate caveats]
-
-## References
-[Full academic citations]
-
-## Appendix
-[Search logs, evaluation notes, raw data]
-```
-
-Length: 10+ pages. Full documentation.
-
-## Working Document
-
-For research that will continue or be built upon.
-
-```
-# [Topic] — Research Notes
-
-**Status:** [In progress / Complete / Needs more]
-**Last updated:** [date]
-**Confidence:** [level]
-
-## Current Answer
-[Best answer so far]
-
-## What We Know
-- [Finding] — [source] — [confidence]
-- [Finding] — [source] — [confidence]
-
-## Open Questions
-- [ ] [Question still unanswered]
-- [ ] [Thing that needs verification]
-
-## Sources Consulted
-| Source | Key Finding | Credibility | Notes |
-|--------|-------------|-------------|-------|
-
-## Search Log
-[Queries tried, what worked, what didn't]
-
-## Next Steps
-[What would improve this research]
-```
-
-Length: Variable. Living document.
-
-## Quick Answer
-
-For simple factual questions.
-
-```
-**Q:** [Question]
-**A:** [Direct answer]
-
-Source: [single best source]
-Confidence: [level]
-```
-
-Length: 3-5 lines. Only when depth isn't needed.

package/templates/workspaces/olivia/skills/in-depth-research/sources.md

@@ -1,80 +0,0 @@
-# Source Types & Evaluation
-
-Reference for evaluating research sources.
-
-## Source Hierarchy
-
-### Tier 1: Primary Sources (Highest Weight)
-- **Original research**: Peer-reviewed studies, clinical trials
-- **Official data**: Government statistics, regulatory filings
-- **Direct documentation**: Patents, standards, specifications
-- **First-hand accounts**: Interviews, testimony, direct observation
-
-### Tier 2: Expert Analysis (High Weight)
-- **Expert commentary**: Domain experts analyzing primary sources
-- **Systematic reviews**: Meta-analyses, literature reviews
-- **Industry reports**: Gartner, McKinsey, specialized analysts
-- **Technical publications**: IEEE, ACM, domain journals
-
-### Tier 3: Quality Secondary (Medium Weight)
-- **Quality journalism**: Investigative reporting, major outlets
-- **Educational content**: Textbooks, university materials
-- **Professional publications**: Trade journals, industry magazines
-
-### Tier 4: General Secondary (Lower Weight)
-- **General news**: Breaking news coverage
-- **Encyclopedias**: Wikipedia (follow citations to primary)
-- **Aggregators**: News roundups, content summaries
-
-### Tier 5: Informal (Use Cautiously)
-- **Forums/Social**: Reddit, Twitter, HN (valuable for practitioner knowledge)
-- **Blogs**: Personal sites (varies wildly — evaluate individually)
-- **User content**: Reviews, comments, discussions
-
-## Evaluation Checklist
-
-For each significant source:
-
-| Factor | Check |
-|--------|-------|
-| **Authority** | Who wrote it? Credentials? Institutional backing? |
-| **Currency** | When published? Still accurate? |
-| **Evidence** | Claims supported by data? Methodology shown? |
-| **Purpose** | Inform? Persuade? Sell? Academic? |
-| **Bias** | Funding sources? Political angle? Conflicts? |
-| **Corroboration** | Do independent sources confirm? |
-
-## Credibility Scoring
-
-```
-High confidence: Tier 1-2, multiple corroborating sources, no conflicts
-Medium confidence: Tier 2-3, some corroboration, minor concerns
-Low confidence: Tier 4-5, single source, or significant bias/conflicts
-Flag: Contradicted by higher-tier sources, major credibility issues
-```
-
-## Domain-Specific Sources
-
-### Technology
-- arXiv, ACM, IEEE, company engineering blogs, GitHub
-
-### Medical/Health
-- PubMed, Cochrane, NIH, peer-reviewed journals (avoid news hype)
-
-### Business/Finance
-- SEC filings, earnings calls, industry analysts, financial press
-
-### Legal
-- Court documents, legal databases, law reviews
-
-### Science
-- Nature, Science, domain journals, preprint servers
-
-## Common Traps
-
-- **Press release as source**: Find the underlying study
-- **Correlation as causation**: Note if source does this
-- **Sample size ignored**: Small n = preliminary at best
-- **P-hacking / cherry-picking**: Look for preregistration
-- **Appeal to authority**: Credentials don't guarantee correctness
-- **Outdated consensus**: Check if field has moved on

package/templates/workspaces/olivia/skills/javascript-skills/README.md

@@ -1,71 +0,0 @@
-# JavaScript Style Guide Skill
-
-A **Prompt-based** AI skill that provides comprehensive JavaScript coding conventions, with additional best-practice rules for modern JavaScript development.
-
-## Overview
-
-This skill automatically activates when you mention or imply **JavaScript** in conversation. It will:
-
-- 🎯 Generate clean, idiomatic JavaScript that follows industry best practices
-- 📏 Enforce consistent code style across variables, functions, objects, arrays, classes, modules, and more
-- ⚡ Provide guidance on modern JavaScript features like async/await, optional chaining, and nullish coalescing
-- 🛡️ Include proper error handling patterns and type safety conventions
-- 📝 Follow JSDoc commenting standards
-
-## Skill Type
-
-**Natural Language — Prompt-based Skill**
-
-No special commands or syntax required. The skill is activated through natural language conversation.
-
-## Quick Start
-
-Simply ask a JavaScript-related question or request:
-
-```
-"Write a JavaScript function to fetch and cache API data"
-"Review my JavaScript code for style issues"
-"What's the best way to handle errors in async JavaScript?"
-```
-
-The skill will respond with code and explanations that conform to the style guide documented in [SKILL.md](./SKILL.md).
-
-## What's Covered
-
-| Category | Key Rules |
-|---|---|
-| **References** | `const` > `let` > never `var` |
-| **Objects** | Literal syntax, shorthand, spread operator |
-| **Arrays** | Literal syntax, higher-order functions, spread |
-| **Destructuring** | Object & array destructuring, multiple return values |
-| **Strings** | Single quotes, template literals |
-| **Functions** | Named expressions, default params, rest params |
-| **Arrow Functions** | Implicit return, always use parentheses |
-| **Classes** | `class` syntax, `extends`, no prototype manipulation |
-| **Modules** | ES modules (`import`/`export`), no wildcard imports |
-| **Variables** | One declaration per variable, group `const` then `let` |
-| **Comparison** | `===`/`!==`, no nested ternaries |
-| **Naming** | camelCase (vars/fns), PascalCase (classes), UPPER_SNAKE (constants) |
-| **Async** | `async`/`await` over `.then()`, `Promise.all` for concurrency |
-| **Error Handling** | Only throw `Error` objects, custom error classes |
-| **Modern JS** | Optional chaining (`?.`), nullish coalescing (`??`) |
-| **Formatting** | 2-space indent, trailing commas, always semicolons |
-
-## File Structure
-
-```
-.
-├── SKILL.md        # Complete style guide rules, activation details, and usage
-├── README.md       # This file — overview and quick reference
-└── LICENSE         # MIT License
-```
-
-## References
-
-- [Airbnb JavaScript Style Guide](https://github.com/airbnb/javascript)
-- [MDN JavaScript Reference](https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript)
-- [ECMAScript Specification](https://tc39.es/ecma262/)
-
-## License
-
-MIT